the red floor, which by profession is sometimes far from art, but in their free time they create an art work, embroider, draw, mold from clay, photograph the initiator. belarusian ideas, union, women with their creativity, beautiful ladies, share in the atrium of the capital shopping center, i see beauty in every corner of ours. together, where we are, we do not have to go to some city or another country. we have a lot of beautiful things. here you come to the city. grodno look at some beautiful city. how much architecture do we have how many churches we have, a kirk, a synagogue, an old new castle, laying down this city can be written endlessly. i love him very much. i see how many we have in different areas, amazing talented people, amazing talented women who manage to combine often difficult work, like our participation today, who generally works

in a bank with seven children, and moreover, a copy, which is even a copy here to name, because these works that we see are the works of a professional, so this means that in our the country has the conditions for the development of such women so that they feel confident and develop their abilities half of the film festival. behind the day before summed up the results of the competition of films for children of youthful audiences listopadik among nine films, the best was the work from russia the bell of hope continues to show films in the nomination of feature and documentary films. the most relevant topics and questions how long does love really live? and why did scientists give her only 3 years, what interests people today and what do you want to put on discussion psychologists came to the conclusion that with

anger to fight? no need to say hello to her, feel any emotion inside yourself, any emotion, it lasts well, if you believe following 11 seconds there is no such feeling as love no, it is rather a complex. it consists of many feelings, there are gratitudes of tenderness affection, see the concept of neutralize on belarus 24 tv channel in the program. here the script cannot be written in one of the programs, the team that scored only one point won, but masterfully rival team. don't look for justice here. it’s not here, because you don’t know how the participants will answer and when it falls into the tower, what kind of tulip flower is this? you have time to think, i'm not, tulip tulip pole star. my

question is, i affirm that in order to win it is desirable to have not only knowledge, but also spatial thinking. who is the author of the answers. we mentally feel each other mentally we feel each other, how does the advertising slogan sound, watch the intellectual entertainment project tower on our tv channel.

hello greetings to all who are now with us with great pleasure. i welcome the guests of today's program. uh, nesi has now reached, therefore, in the process of conversation, we will still join one of the respected interlocutors, but we will not waste time, because the subject will go a lot in order, and from the past, who is the dkb, who is now is still in the information flow remembered. this phrase will be set on fire along the entire perimeter of russia here we see belarus in the twentieth year central asia south caucasus of course, all our attention. now riveted to the attempt, while i will be so shaping the attempt to resolve the conflict between armenia and

azerbaijan is a long history, and the price is already thousands of lives. we have seen that at the recent ldkbe summit an agreement was reached that in the near future there will be a meeting of the leaders of armenia and azerbaijan, mediated by the president of the russian federation, this meeting took place in sochi on monday. there, and vladimir putin announced the following peace treaty between yerevan and baku not yet, but there are prerequisites that indicate that the path to a settlement between baku and yerevan has been found. here is vadim in your opinion. here it all looks like aside close to reconciliation. but how stable is it? and that in this case, the stabilizing factors and the virgin factors stabilizing what is happening between armenia and azerbaijan well, if we talk about armenia and azerbaijan, then we understand that as a result of the fact that russia today has significantly concentrated its efforts on its special military operation.

the positions of the csto have become less strong. this is an objective fact that less powerful turkey has increased its influence in the region significantly. on all issues of the middle east, turkey has slightly different views on the issues of the north caucasus . this is the meeting that took place. we see that the parties have almost come to some kind of compromise solution, but we need to understand what is the most important nuance. eh, what will ours be for? how do we say push? uh, opponents after all, and what is not but we must understand the root problem, where does the problem come from, uh, because a dkb was formed after the collapse of the union and the countries came, uh, to the formation of the csto with different problems, after all, with different views on development on the one hand. we had a common market. the common defense

policy - that lay us on the other side. the country was also looking at another development option. what do you think, looking at how pashinyan and aliyev behave even at this meeting in sochi, and the parties are determined to resolve this conflict at the negotiating table, or each of them holds some cards under the cloth conditionally speaking, yes, in order to play them at the right time , you understand one thing. you know there is a nuance. it's still such that now you broke up the union, but uh, the union broke up, but the sides are all sides of the csto - they came. uh, russia, unfortunately, has not managed to become, in absolute terms , a centripetal force, uniting the csto in many ways in many respects its role. there, the defining and decisive, that is, the most powerful, the state, the csto. we judge, for example, yes, it is still specifically them today. let's remember the meeting of the president with the general secret, and that's how it was for you, where the topic is, of course, azerbaijan's armenia was central please ended in what

ended decided on the sides that a mediator is needed, this is the norm of the classic. uh, of course, it was russia who turned to russia. russia landed hundreds of people there, remember how russian border guards flew planes, as putin said, they are located on all sections of the border from turkey to iran there and between armenia and azerbaijan, and so on. what else necessary? e, let them work in this direction. it was not in vain that i said that there is a certain game going on. i understand what game. why was the european union dragged in there, why is the obes-e dragging it there. well, why? well, it’s understandable, why would they do anything there, if there is already, uh, a mediator and another csto there, as if there is nothing else to do. and yet here is igorevna why is the west stuffing itself into intermediaries for them. really. this is how it is necessary to close this project called anti-russia, or there are

some other goals in this regard. west not only now took attempts. this is part of the participation in this regulation and what we see today and this is the continuation of these programs that were uh previously announced, but, and today we are paying closer attention to their initiatives, because we are asking a quite logical question. what did they come with? do they really want to resolve this conflict? or do they have some additional additional motivation, uh, and unfortunately we have a negative answer to this question, because we see more additional hidden motivation. and what concerns, but the anti-e of the russian project, who want to close it? yes, they say a lot about this, but i do not agree with uh, here you are. e, in particular, in the fact that russia has weakened its position without russia and

the rest, as it were, the situation in the region could not be settled. that's what we're talking about weakening, what criteria we are guided by. this is a very, very difficult question. but will it be possible to close it, and if at all such plans for an anti-russian project? i think that for sure they are in theory, but their implementation in practice is anyone at any stage, especially at today's very, very employees, literally one word is called, if you have a stronger player in the region, a powerful economy and a military group, turkey is natural. you become weaker, but i say again, we do not mean that the role of russia is the decisive settlement of this conflict. it remains, and most importantly, because the peacekeeping force in this region, for which it can be able to try on these e, the republic is the russian federation, we pay tribute to russia, but here, k unfortunately. there is a fact that today certain

positions of russia and forces are diverted. this is a fact and we will be thrown under the whole button. this means that we must naturally allow the appropriate nuances in order to kindle this conflict, and they will not be peacekeepers. they will fuel this conflict from a historical point of view, again this is a traditional policy. west, when they strive, these are the possible peace treaties, agreements that are unprofitable for them to prevent all sorts of conclusion and kindle this, uh, a wave of conflicts along the perimeter of the russian federation from my point of view. this is quite obvious for this. and it is necessary to involve the european union and others there, which means european structures that will never work to pay off this azerbaijani conflict, because it is a priori beneficial to them, unlike the russian federation and, from my point of view, the russian federation in once again demonstrated its strong position, the negotiations in sochi, just the same, gave certain results and i think that neither the peoples of azerbaijan nor the peoples of armenia are interested. in the continuation of this conflict. it is necessary to look for a normal peaceful way of regulation. let's just sort it out, well, firstly, i wanted to indicate to the audience that a

hygen has joined us. here is one franchise. we are just an intermediary now speak. in the country of the west, which i am now trying to impose, i quote a specific example of my friendship. i will cite as early as october 6 in prague, in fact, the eu leaders agreed on the deployment, but they agreed on the deployment of an observation mission in armenia. one of the authors macron of this project, and a week later he openly stated that azerbaijan had initiated the karabakh war and allegedly. russia helped him in this in order to weaken armenia, so they have a completely clear position on what is happening between armenia and azerbaijan, he said that such a wife is clear, because therefore the macron’s statement was clearly about the armenian a lot. uh, judgments and experts. why was it needed? well , some believe that historical france will support armenia. i think that this is not the case. historical. eh moments. it's uh, here are the experts. they said an attempt on the one hand to annoy russia, he is a macron in the same statement very sharply appreciated the negative, as he said, the role of the

russian federation, therefore, regulation, but on the other. the parties, e macron, e, are frantically trying to take the place of the main european politician. here he climbs into various situations. this is not only karabakh. here, there is, like he has statements to the balkans and at his position on ukraine, he is trying to become just such a locomotive of the main european politician. this is his priority task. we e it is quite, apparently, when the question arises. are countries like france able to guarantee peace. here you need to look at what president alexander lukashenko said, indeed in the post-soviet space there is only one scheme for resolving any conflicts of disputes and discussions when the two sides agree. even despite stereotypes of prejudice. some of them exist. all of them are members of the commonwealth of independent states, as at least and only the russian federation has the power, tools and knowledge. and most importantly, the

interest to ensure peace and security there, because i think that security in the south caucasus in central asia is, uh, the security of the national security of the russian federation for france and the united states in these territories. they are manipulative, they use them as a struggle for their influence in the world. here is the difference. and by the way, for some positions, despite the fact that they are competitors, but in this part russian interests even intersect with turkish ones. here, look, in response to macron's remark, the elevator immediately declared a reaction in general. baku was extremely harsh, and he said that france crossed out the entire history of relations with azerbaijan. as you can see, i think that we are talking here to a greater extent. he was emotional statements. and the heads of state, including this is the practice of a crisis situation, since something does not look like that, unlike the macron, aliyev will very quickly give up his

words. naturally, the problem is that no just. we can make a decision any statement you like, but there is no simple solution today , and the question of the peace treaty, and which has been sounding like the last for weeks and months. e, he is impossible in fact, therefore, they remain in the bottom line. only uh, loud statements. eh, there is. uh, the desire to find some kind of consensus to come to some point, stabilizing and the belarusian position. it is precisely this that is not a peace treaty that must be signed. this is not possible today, but that the parties come, uh, to some kind of consensus, so that they, uh, settle. that stabilized their interests external position. we see back on september 18, pelosi, when she came to a. and she came to yerevan, first of all, on the wave of the fact that a number of politicians in armenia made a statement that the accident could not cope, that this was not a shooting gun. and so, arriving there, the pilot and

what did we say we are here to say in the us it will be. maintain democracy in armenia in difficult times. we stand next to armenia when there is a struggle between democracy and autocracy armenia is the place where we can clearly see these contradictions, in general, when the americans say this, it sounds like a threat, because we are all already at peace. we are used to the fact that if someone from washington or london shouts that we are going to defend democracy, expect a war in this region , the armenians understand this, because if the armenians are not ready to resolve this conflict peacefully, then not the csto. neither russia nor belarus will be able to influence the fact that there, finally, about the dkb in yerevan i remember when, uh, there were still here, when yerevan was preparing there, the eurasian economic union, they even then said that here is the dkb. doesn't protect us as it should. well, you know, this is such a masculine conversation that was at five and on friday at the summit in the state clinical hospital. what did you guys say. well, come on, this is how the

position of russia and belarus differs from the position. we are not the west here are such phrases. how did you drink? yes, we are ready to defend. here the president clearly said that you crawl there in general, well, a little differently words. but although he used to clobber us around the perimeter, that you are pretending to be something there. you know each other lived in the same country sit down and talk. yes, there are difficulties. why are you wild goats climbing these mountains, they don’t even go. what are you playing. why are you playing this? what does the arable land want to do, hide behind the csto, blame the dkb for what for the fact that from the eighteenth year he brought his country to a military defeat, because the situation is not that the dkb is not the way it should be protected, but the situation is, in what condition hosts the armenian armed forces. and who led to this situation? a and. eh, there are many examples. uh, it means to indicate some were how they used the s-300 systems and many other things that happened during this war and the subsequent

president opened up about this the second moment i less pashinyan declares. well, azerbaijan is not members of the dcb. so why are you behaving like this? well, azerbaijan on february 22, in my opinion, well, exactly on february 22 signed with russia that the declaration is actually de facto, defining the status of azerbaijan as union state and the president of belarus, we have the same situation, he said, listen, yes, the armenians are our allies. we wish you well, we wish the territorial integrity of sovereignty, armenia so that you finally resolve your problems, but azerbaijan is also a state close to us. so we will fight with him for what, but here is our peacekeeping task. why alexander lukashenko is called the main peacemaker in the soviet space to achieve peace. and now, when such honest unpleasant words and unpleasant speaks, but these honest words sound. this is a much more serious step towards peace. than some stupid macron declarations, or these empty statements by

pilots. let's remember and who said what in this? president and then we will definitely continue, please, as a result of the republic. as the president of the singing of azerbaijan, armenia and russia, reach a unanimous opinion, without looking, i will support this unanimous opinion. excuse me if, maybe i don't see it that way many miles from this theater of operations. but that's my impression of what's going on there. these borders, i said so in a comradely way, what are you guys fighting for? why are you fighting in these mountains for 2,000 kilometers, ruined the height? three three hundred people died, where people don't live, where even these goats don't walk. why are you fighting, sit down, you

two and agree. and let russia sanctify this treaty. but you don't want some sort of game going on here. this game can not be, because the issue of war and peace in the west is being resolved, and first of all they have a filigree art. divide and conquer. listen. that's what i started, a dkb with one formed. uh, our space was formed on all the principles that unite us, but there were a lot of contradictions. first, there was a union state. the soviet union borders were not normally established, you know, between all the practical republics. uh, central asia has border issues. and the caucasus, armenia, azerbaijan, we acquainted with the conflict, the entire president talked about what we need to prevent in the first place. uh, the aggravation of the situation along the entire perimeter of the

russian federation along the entire perimeter. today there is such a threat and today they will use all means to set fire to several hot spots along the perimeter of the russian federation , the task is to stretch the forces of russia and destabilize the political situation in the country inside, and as soon as they destabilize the situation in russia, uh, all cis countries will fall. and most importantly, i want to say, because it is important. it concerns us. what worries me most now, i want to say in response, let's say to hotheads, and now i was invited to russian television there are channels where the topic is discussed, should belarus take a direct part in a military-special military operation, that is, send a contingent there, that is, they are already discussing it. look, there are three categories of people who can advocate for this. the first is people. ah, mentally retarded, but we don’t

touch them at all with a fool, there’s nothing to talk about, the second is that these people are smart, educated, our people are patriots, but they are a little fanatic - they have such fanaticism fanaticism, it always interferes with thinking, you understand, then yes, they are ready to throw everything into the furnace of war. war is not only strength and firepower. this is, first of all, the ability to think, the ability to think, and the economy, and the third is the agents of influence, agents of deep penetration, which from the inside undermine the situation in russia, i want to do it again. the emphasis for russia is, first of all, the main interest of these 208,000 m² to preserve the zones of political economic stability. this is the most important thing and the first step towards the collapse of russia is all zero, belarus is an armed conflict government to do very it will be difficult to ensure stability on the perimeter. after all, more than once they talked about tajikistan, kyrgyzstan, except for armenia, azerbaijan, and pay attention to the moment. he, of course, was ironic when the president asked stanislav israel's question, he didn't sit up and flew off to moscow, and then he indicated that

, in fact, 3 years is not enough for the general secretary of the dkb. and now we understand why. because in each of these areas there is a very serious situation in order to delve into it and specifically effectively. hmm, and you need to deal with this issue in including time and complex. quite right. here's another front. let's discuss it. look, as soon as we see calls in the west to go save democracy. here they are waking up. well, cells, whatever. you can name them here. he announced the creation of an anti-war committee under the wing of khodorkovsky, for example, in russia it is not an absolutely new idea, but nevertheless, it is now being raised again now these anti-war committees of khodorkovsky forums free of russia kasparov it is most likely pro-polish there about the western tikhanovskaya with their cabinets before this guaido venezuela, this front, yes, or the front line. here is vyacheslavich. eh, that's something to keep in mind. here, what kind of game is being played here, so that we don’t

oversleep it either, but absolutely. clear. what kind of game, when there is a conflict with on the outer perimeter, should the forces involved be about the western yes , focused on supporting these western forces, which is located inside the country. this is a very dangerous thing. here is the fifth sixth column, some say and their existence must be borne in mind that such things will be shown and this tough confrontation between west and east is being waged. yes, therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to them, but on the other hand, it is necessary to open them. to show, well, what does it lead to that they hide behind these beautiful words about peace, there is democracy and so on, but what peace and democracy are today is something when they give obama a prize for the war in iraq, that means the nobel for peace, this is a peacemaker yes, who completely ruined the country destroyed it up into chaos. eh, they still ca n't figure it out. these are the double standards. it is necessary to clearly and clearly show our society so that people can see what is behind these beautiful words, but this is information stuffing in order to remind oneself, or really. here

's something to look forward to from these guys. uh, something that, maybe you know something else, what you want to understand, this is such an attempt to create some kind of quasi-pseudo -legitimate government in exile, so that when the mess starts, you can give legitimacy to external intrusion. same method. you know, there was such an organization, the jamborio was called vot jamboree. it was the cia specifically created by the americans, when it was cold. the war is the unification of uh anti-soviet rebel groups in nicaragu angola, there uh latin america, that is, it is the same thing, they are trying. that's how the methods that were in the cold war are the methods that are now being created from pro-western politicians. yes, yes, your groups of influence, because and what are we going to hide that we don’t have people of the russian federation left people who are guided by, well, in russia, the same khodorkovsky, the same kasparov, yes , there are such people, they are in the minority, but they

exist, they become radicalized, they become angry. and, of course, the americans will try to stake on this, uh, create centers of such influence abroad. i think these are only the first steps, and the next moment for these people, of course, is an attempt to remind ourselves, we see what a fight is going on here, uh, between uh, our fugitives had difficulty stuffing them there in august in this one bag. e tikhonov's office someday you know, here they have an office, probably they closed the door, and they still pushed the lettuce in with their feet, he resisted the door was locked, putting this bald sucker in. so guard there with shooting. by the way, interesting. i'm here, uh, recently listened to this extremist. he learned the belarusian language from him, did not know it, but he speaks. represent in belarusian with a polish accent. here walking it turned out there. yes, the lieutenant colonel says yush, mom, polish words slip through all the time. here's how they line up. that's what they are some belarusian politicians. with them, this polish accent

will always strike exactly the same way as these feigins and kasparov khodorkovskys, no matter how they declare, what they think about the future of the russian people is their main topic, how to divide russia how to make russia weaken people in the future they see it, that is, people see our people. here we are talking, what is it now, when we meet in the republic. hey, when are we going to explain? they see that evil comes from these people. here they declared the world became shaped. on the territory of ukraine, military formations are under their own type of command, then their command is not recognized. that is, they make peace with each other there, the same khodorkovskys cannot do everything else. well, who will trust them when people understand and hear they openly talk about how to draw borders inside russia in the future. how to make people quarrel among themselves? read their reports at these foreign conferences where the main topic is. how to identify the most anti-russian parts of the country, how to find the parts to bet, which

put money in there? how to find a leader there, people see it. they feel it, but the danger of these groups in the full sense of the collaborationist groups cannot be underestimated. and, of course, our special services are also using them for our russian related work. how much more we disagreed , i, uh, would have seen more subtle settings here, as it seems to me, but here is the anti-russian rhetoric. it developed at the first stage in a very narrow direction against the russian leadership. federation in particular vladimir putin and waves, which accompanied her in parallel, these were waves against the russians in general and today. this is the narrow line against the government. for the leadership of russia, it has already exhausted itself and it is necessary to look for new mechanisms for information work with the population. after all, even in our countries, the neighbors declared a long time ago that the russians should make a revolution at home, not sit here with us, but make a revolution at home and involve russians in this topic. e creations here are such already

quite well-a-clearly delineated structures. just indicates that the information that needs to be conveyed at this stage should be voiced by russians, that is, the code that they should send should be a russian code not western, because western ones no longer work absolutely agree with vadim pay attention, it is impossible, because it is not clear. at what stage it can go into another phase, it is impossible to probe it, but western diplomats came to our kurapaty. yes, it didn’t become like it all, yes, when we say partridges, i would generally suggest that this word should be abandoned , this word was invented. well, the tract where in large numbers and where where you understand, and we continue this myth created there in the late eighties and the poznyak did it on purpose, but don't care. he wanted

those people who were shot and the nef would not give a damn. e. they constantly exaggerate these figures and why do they emphasize this word kurapaty , because they strive to turn uh into uh. this is part of their biography, part of their political history for them, kurapaty, as and the chernobyl way is not the memory of the executed and it is not the memory of the catastrophe at the nuclear power plant, it is the memory of the entire birth of bmx, the memory of their political youth, which could lead them. to the power that we constantly repeat this word. we're working pouring water on their mill. no, no partridges. this invented name is excellent. i am very glad that you made this remark absolutely, and it is all the more complemented by absurdity and indignation on our part. that's why western diplomats came to this tract, there were no oppositionists who went before there, western diplomats came, the question arises. here we are constantly talking about what is going on. if not openly, then a hybrid war, it is knitted to us by the west and western diplomats come

to this tract why at this time in order to send us some kind of madge? some, you might think, why, at the same moment, when, for example, in italy, the fascist march is taking place, mussolini is remembered, no one comes to the italian embassy and talks about the trail and victims that reach for the name of musalini. here, how to relate to the fact that western diplomats and ours may have some kind of tolerance of incomprehensible humanity, when we look at it this way, well, with an understanding of it, or how they look at holy fools. that is why we allow us to be dealt with like this when they try to demonstrate something to our population and us on our territory or send some kind of message here, the message that they lay in these visits and so on. places like this. this is again pedaling that the soviet union is negative is a totalitarian society, because it absolutely does not correspond from a scientific point of view absolutely. eh, so these things they play on this

political situation, which is unfolding in the world, it is necessary to open this underwater one. they came there, not to commemorate the people who died, but to make a policy on the spot once again to show their accents. here the west says that the ussr soviet society is bad. why are you focusing on him , focusing on us. look how good we are, how we keep your memory of this tragedy. although they wanted to spit, as it was already told here. the first thing to do is to ignore them, they don't exist. there we are inflating this topic. some handful of some diplomats came. they go everywhere, that they walk through the forest, they all went to the forest, and you and i are creating an informational occasion. who knows about this in belarus , today we are discussing a pot on national television with you, let them come, e, the monument to victory and kneel, like merkel thumped on her knees in buchenwald, let them us fell to our knees, for each folded belarusian child. they run through the woods. there is logic here, on the one hand, that it is not necessary to attach such importance to this, on the other hand, these are

representatives of official representatives of foreign states, and they declare the position of their sovereigns on our territory. we can't help but react to what civil society is reacting to. look, you see, not the state, until i saw it, maybe if i had missed the statement there mida yes, it probably will be. oh, let's hope as well, but civil society responds. after all, those who came there to protest against this parish. these are not just journalists, they are the leader of public opinion. and our patriots, our people demand from these diplomats to stop such walking, that is, the people themselves demand. because if this goes unpunished, they will perceive it as a challenge to our national identity. our national memory, therefore, of course, we cannot allow this. but what else pleases me is this reaction of diplomats - this reaction of some neighboring states. and such a hysterical response to our historical

policy with you. here are examples that the belarusian state. i assure you i look even to the younger generation. i do not want to overestimate the tree, there is no knock. yes, but it is bearing fruit that we are changing the school course in history, that we taught chickens from the history of belarusian statehood. we have upgraded and are still looking. how is the teaching of social science block universities. yes uh year of historical memory what we are doing to commemorate our what we are we deal with the negative moments and collaborators and the regional army and everything that was here it causes a terrible simply rejection, because we beat. eh, that's the worst. here in this rat, uh, rat essence of this pseudo-nationalism, implicated in some kind of pro-polish intentions. we are hitting such people there, we are destroying the basis of the ideology that lay, er, in the attempted coup d'état of the twentieth year. and naturally. we will we will speak the truth and

stalinist repressions. we will speak the truth, but those who create here will not need the truth. these myths. ah, there are pseudo-kurapatahs for us any, that is, for us any victims that were made, we mourn for them, moreover, the state recognized that the victims were innocent, but the state did it, and people are trying to pervert this memory using their political interests, only with the truth to be careful, in the nineties we were forced to tell the truth, and in our country every chekist was a criminal, you know or not, and many policemen, so to speak, were shown separate wild documents. and we continue our program let's move on in more detail, let's talk about poland, which has already become such a permanent threat. and it no longer hides. uh, the state secretary of light safety of belarus in alfovich in an interview with osb belarus said so today, the political course. warsaw clearly indicates

preparations for war. well, i would like to pay attention to the curious material that was published by the belgian portal modern diplomacy of modern diplomacy and we read their plans from polish politicians quite specific quotes the plan parties of right justice to revive the republic of poland within the boundaries of historical lands. it seems that operations on the territory of the former ussr took shape long before the russian war, writes this portal, the authors of this article believe that in the event of the seizure of the territory. warsaw will try to hold a referendum to bypass the membership. poland please the polish authorities. by that time, the vsu will already be broken, i pay attention to writing about it. belgian edition, and how realistic is this scenario olga i would pay attention first of all to the fact that that this is more the opinion of the poles and not the portal. just reprinted this article. yes, yes, uh, and uh, this is just a scenario of which there is

one and scenarios for the development of the situation, of which there are many today, it is possible to see it as realistic. i think two tracks should be watched here. these are the possibilities of the political track and the military track, if we are talking about the military track for poland in particular, then everything uh, secretary of state, uh in belorussia volfovich and the security council and the figures that have been translated. they are completely in line with the situation. this really so, but you need to see what is on the other side, but on the other side. after all , poland is a member of nato and, by its own assertion, an exemplary member of nato, therefore, in any case, it will coordinate all its actions with its allies for it. this is extremely important, and this is a military track, as far as the political poland is a member of the european union and the legitimacy of its actions, obtaining some kind of permits is also extremely important for poland.

but the position of poland is tough and irreconcilable unambiguous. it is very difficult to perceive in the european union, and for the colonization of poland, which warns a separate european politicians, it is. and that's what i printed. uh, belgian portal. we can consider, of course, from the point of view that this is how it could be in the direction of poland. well, maybe this is a warning for europe , uh, what plans are hatched by individual countries of this moment. you understand, in order to talk about the fact that the mass of these complex factors, today it greatly restrains the speed of movement of a second person. i would like to point out what point, yes, we can talk about reality. of course, it's unrealistic. well, look, in fact, poland has already taken a step towards the creation of another commonwealth. they also received special rights for their citizens on the territory of ukraine, which is like not a recreation, which means that this polish commonwealth had this first step, they perceive it so polish in fact . yes

, at first how they created it, and in 1569 they were oriented towards this polish elites to impose this colonization of these lands, which became part of the commonwealth and further systematically. methodically, from century to century, these things have been realized and now there is a new turn in the twentieth year. they declared openly that they needed the same whole of belarus , not only on the western eastern crosses. yes , they claim their own, but for our entire territory, and in ukraine they have an opportunity. they have already won themselves special rights and can enter into state bodies. and this is good ground for, at the right time, as they say, to come out of the shadows and to make these lands part of the polish state of a colleague at first, this is what is happening, all this has long been described. predicted and it was all planned. listen in order to motivate the country to take certain actions. think about the country suffered huge losses in the great patriotic war. for them, it was world war ii. they had a historical memory, but it was necessary to formulate such concepts in society that would allow them to

perceive militarization normally. second e to form an image of the enemy set up on one side against the russian federation, on the other hand, is like occupiers on the other hand against germany, reparations to germany for this, the americans very competently threw the idea of ​​great poland from the sea and exploited this idea and are still exploiting it in order to motivate poland to this aggressive militaristic position . it was not just that the ideal infrastructure for the transfer of troops was built there. it was not just that money was pumped in there, and today poland no longer understands one thing, that i will arrange these plans for the great poland they they are the tool and the first strike force that they want to send the old world does not want to fight. here, poland. this is the next force behind ukraine, which will fight in the baltic states, there are not enough resources. you've been there, they create conditions for the placement of ebosnat on their territory. and here is poland from the point of view of the population of the

depths of the territory of readiness for some kind of concept to carry out military operations. she 's practically today. well, and an independent international subject, which can wage war without the participation of nato. if you look at those troops, who are concentrating in poland and on the technical support of these troops, then poland today can independently conduct a regional conflict operation, poland from my point of view. again, this is a vivid example of this divide, rule, anglo- saxon policy, which is carried out because the united states of great britain is not interested. everything in a strong european union, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the eternal enemy for the west - this means russia, those who are in alliance with it, and poland is just the perfect tool, which allows you to keep both sides in good shape. yes, and under the threat of some of these actions, they really will not, but the fact remains that poland is the conductor of this anglo-saxon policy in europe along the continental, and nevertheless belittled the importance of the polish politicians themselves and did not belittle their subjectivity. and we see that eastern

european politicians, whether orban or, means, the poles of independence, no matter what they stake on, they carry out their policy. enough independently and, of course, the americans did not throw in the idea of ​​greater poland, it was permanently exploited. well, let's say it straight out regardless. this was before the us became a great power. this idea is present in the polish establishment permanently, and moreover, no one formulates it like greater poland, it has the name of the fourth speech of the commonwealth, it all revolves around this. this plan is from my point of view. he is not realistic. uh, why do we need to think of something for the poles what they want to do, perhaps he somewhere lies there in some kind, so i don’t know the polish shoes, there is the general staff or some kind of party headquarters. they are open about what they want to do. that is, they have a plan, if you have a plan mr. fix fix, he says there is a plan, they have a plan, the fourth speech uh,

germany and france are european forces for this, so we think that the americans are using poles a. warsaw think that i don't use these poles americans. yes, they use it to their advantage, that is, poland should become equal of berlin and with paris the next moment is the creation of a chain of states dependent on poland from the baltic to the black sea. and they take the caucasus there, for example, georgia, too, for this they do not need to include territory. why don't i believe that they can hold such a referendum, it's the belgians. and by the way, speaking westerners do not fully understand our mentality. they now think russia held a referendum and poland will. well, in donetsk, that's who was in the donbass, he understands that there most of the people sympathize with russia, there are those who do not support it, but a significant part sympathizes with what do you think in lviv, like this, the inhabitants will go and vote for more. and even if they do , this referendum is a terrible

dream for the poles to include in their state. there are 10 million ukrainians and several million are already living there, there are 10 more refugees. millions of ukrainians, they openly declare. this will be the bondarization of poland , they are afraid of this. and here is the creation of the network protectorates are all these dependent puppet states. these are their goals, what vyacheslav viktorovich spoke about. this is an agreement. this is actually an agreement on a protectorate, not much time remains, but we involuntarily come to this topic. and the theme of global confrontation. here's a recent one. uh, valdai, vladimir putin said that we have not come to a systemic crisis, but to a doctrinal one . what does it mean, in principle, if we say in general terms that we all already understood that the system of international relations has broken down, but for in order to build a new kind of world order , everyone needs to answer the main question. under what conditions will we build it? well, this is, if in general to formulate the general, yes, criminality, it is also about values ​​and about semantic ones. in this case, it illustrates well who is such a

spiritual enemy, not only modern russia, he himself outlined this circle much more widely we go there. that we are entering, and so the other day, us congressman jamie raskin made an extremely russophobic statement , you think that he considers belarusian russophobic that russia must be completely destroyed, and at any cost and this is how he calls his motives and i quote russia an orthodox country professing traditional values, moscow is the world center of anti-feminist anti-gay anti-transgender hatred and at the same time, almost on the same days in texas right on the street, satanists staged a ritual denial of baptism. an inverted cross was drawn on the forehead of the one who came, and then baptized peregyn to satan. well, it is quite obvious that the congressmen spread this act of rejection not calls. here comes the question. so what is this global battle for, which, if we split it up, looks like armenia azerbaijan is in crisis for ukraine there is young. uh, serbia and other other issues, but

globally. here's what that confrontation looks like. here you are for yourself and here. here you need to understand that e is a collective west, but first of all, the anglo-saxons want to maintain global dominance. why not fight to maintain the ability to control the world to divide and rule. in this case, at the end there is group of countries, but this will include russia china india a number of other states. well, belarus, respectively, as an ally of russia, it is natural that they want to build a more harmonious system of relations between states. including this, let's just figure it out. this is understandable, two concepts. again, they have already been formulated. there is the concept of global dominance and the concept of a global sheet. no one is against having leaders, you know, and also the same multipolar world, but the leader sees next to him strong independent subjects capable of to express their position, which will be influenced by the stronger ones, but to express their position of the countries

that offer the concept of global dominance. they see next to them only the satellites of the metropolia and satel here specifically look. it is necessary to remove the orthodox country, which prevents gays from maintaining order. that is, look, here you just took something about what. we are talking now. this is one of the many international mechanisms developed after the second world war are under the control of the united states and international financial systems. do you understand or not? therefore, we do not operate these mechanisms of justice. eh, transfer the philosophical to the real soil. you see, philosophy, it has and practically changes pleases, as the discussion of the law is going on in the entire belarusian people's assembly. first, people perceive the idea. there are practically no critical remarks, this body is not needed. yes, it's easy to explain, but there are specific remarks, but about, uh, our people want uh, so that the role of labor collectives will increase. they are more broad than the authors law understand the civil society of our patriotic civil society, which was

formed after the twentieth year. they ask questions. and this destroys the myth created by enemy propaganda. for some kind of dictatorship, such democratic processes and the discussion of the adoption of the constitution now, the discussion of the law of the ovns is very important and important now that the government hears the people, these are the comments that are being made. and i am sure that it will be so, which is introduced during the discussion of the law on all-belarusian people's assembly. and we see how, during this discussion, even those comments that are made by the entire belarusian people's assembly. it gains legitimacy. the most important thing is the trust of the people. we saw this already in february 21, when it actually ended this difficult period and opened a page of gradual political transformation for belarus. but now this discussion once again emphasizes how mature our society is, it is taking steps towards the authorities and the authorities are taking steps towards the

citizens. well, thank you very much for participating in this conversation. on the one hand, it turned out to be diverse, but on the other hand, one way or another, we passed. the main thing is creation or what? at a minimum, keeping the focus of our attention on a just state is ensuring security, which will not be exclusively locally much global, which is what we really really would like. thank you very much for today. we will show modern belarus from an unusual angle, you have discovered the unique belarus and its culture, we will provide an opportunity to see and understand something that is not visible through the eyes of local residents. and when minsky came here, thousands came here for peace, uh, and the weather is good, very foreigners about life in

belarus, friends. they are always there, and they helped me a lot, and they are from the critique of character. i feel very comfortable, sometimes i read my peoples, as i have already got used to. eh, not offensive at all. see in the program a look at belarus on belarus 24 tv channel. would you like to spend one day in the center? mother and child, our center stands at the origins of the life and health of our children with my own eyes, how doctors help children at the initial stage of their lives. in general, we saw the operation ourselves, although in principle of moderate severity, but at a minus kilogram, at least there is, you see such a little green eye. here i am talking now. yes, and it says in green it means in terms of decibels. here is our conversation is quite acceptable. he

, too, is a small child, painting frames 800. or maybe you would like to learn more about such a difficult and very important profession as a teacher. my job is to teach and educate your children. show me how holding a pencil. tasya show me how to hold a pencil. and this is your second life, your family, where there are no holidays and somewhere you have no right to make a mistake in the project one day we watch you with the unique people of our country on belarus 24 tv channel.

good evening live panorama in the studio ekaterina tikhomirova a the main topics of this day, how the work of the government and the regulatory framework of belarus will change, and what demands were voiced by the president by the minister, we will tell in the panorama of the struggle for the chambers.