all adjoining people started your professional holiday in intelligence. this phrase, by the way, was not authored by putin, but by henry kissinger, us presidential adviser on national security, us secretary of state, and laureates. forgive me lord nobel prize. so , last week my colleagues from the telen news agency shared the tv news. the data of a closed american social survey on belarus turned out to be at the disposal of journalists. let's translate into russian this survey was cut by our intelligence and handed over to journalists. and regardless of results. the very fact that classified information was easily stolen by our chekists. in any case, it would cause a storm of negative emotions in washington and run away, so, as they say, regularly stolen, it follows that the international republican institute from the usa ordered the sun to follow from another american institute of the institute of the gallof institute of ge. i called 1,500

belarusians, the choice is, of course, well, so-so, but how is it to the question of which of the leaders of the opposition. do you trust most of all the name tikhanovskaya named 1% of the respondents have the surname latushka, babariko less than one percent, half of the respondents do not trust any, total in the amount of 3%, and finally it became clear who that very meme is really about and about when he laughs well. the one who knows the truth, and the truth is behind us on other issues, more than half of the respondents have not heard at all, neither the conferences of the fugitives nor about their cabinets, more than 70% support the political direction of belarus and tend to support the current government, and the proportion of those who do not approve of the government in belarus less than 15% the chairman of the board of ont and the author of the term fugitive marat markov in the editors' club beautifully trolled and adherents of this whole party 15% do not approve of the current 15% rate in 2020 voted against

the 20% rate. yes, yeah, 20 drank no, well, let's take the numbers voted for the president. yes, they don't approve. this course. here, even if the operation on the data does not feed, to put it mildly, love for lukashenka and the gap institute, then according to their numbers. it means that most of the people who did not vote in the twentieth today would go to give vote for lukashenka, what is the problem of the markovs? well , most likely, if you ignored the elections, then you are not for lukashenka, but they already understood what he was doing for the country and what and for what other countries others were doing, while the fluent were silent or spoke general philosophical changes supported them stronger. well , as soon as they began to talk more specifically about sanctions against belarus and then about the need for an armed solution to the issue, that is, about the need to bomb a huge number of their supporters in belarus, if they didn’t change course, then at least many people who were

against the current government thought about it. and what is there against lukashenka personally in 2 years they understood a lot and changed their opinion, including, because we tried to explain a lot to them, and lukashenka personally in the first place. and here's the question. and what to do with those people who in 2020 were opposed to the authorities went on the march, but today they have a different opinion and today's brains will not go to those protests, on the one hand. there is a law to participate in an unsanctioned rally. this law violation. what is required punishment? on the other hand, there are statutes of limitations and logic. and as for me, if in 2 years we pulled a person over to our side, or at least neutral, pulling him out of the protest mass, and today he will receive a fine or a day for the action of 2020, which he would not repeat today. maybe by doing this we will return him to the protest mass, not because of politics, but because, in his opinion, unfair punishment for the

position of two years ago, which he already has a completely different one. this is a complex and delicate question, and there is supporters of very different approaches to one simple question. what to do now with the participants of unauthorized rallies in 2020, as for those who threw stones and bottles at the riot police or barricaded the streets everything is clear. they need to be punished further. well, if a person just walked out 2 years ago, and he has nothing to show but participation. as for me, exactly the same approach is needed here as in the issue of price regulation, let me remind you that alexander lukashenko demanded the creation of a system that is clear and understandable to all participants process of rules and subjectively, we still have to work out this clear system, because all belarusians are ours, those who went out for a walk are also ours, and the problem is in the next couple of thousand or a couple of tens of thousands some part of the walkers walked because of the stupidity of desire to participate, at least some party, that is, out of boredom people. maybe a smarter person. he can

understand something and change his mind, but if the smartest, but then someone who looked like somewhere, lives for the third year with a slight touch of fear for the consequences of those of his actions, about which this feeling of fear already sincerely regrets, with all the inevitability of punishment for offenses, will greatly hinder him from trusting the current authorities. and then we trust her completely, just as a slight touch of fear for him will interfere a little with maintaining the current government to his family and friends. and this is a complex issue, and not just a question of the criminal code or the coap, after all, a quote from alexander lukashenko , laws can be changed. this is so a topic for discussion, but it has long come to us to reason time, as the time has come, as for me, not only to wet the ideological enemy. i’m already talking about propaganda in general, of course, it’s necessary to wet the enemy and we should have tools of this kind, but it seems

that our ultimate goal is not to make them feel worse or worse than us. our goal is to make it better for us now than we had yesterday. yes, i agree that many initiatives have traditionally been considered for a long time, let's say, bchbeshny, if the logic is to close everything protest in the name of counter-revolution to hell, well there is some logic. but we can take these initiatives under the pro -government wing even more subtly. i understand very well that the protest ideology was invested in the grants of drugs and dogs, and so far cats and dogs. everyone fed, everyone listened at the same time and talked about how not democratic everything in belarus grants agree to block, but cats and dogs far from politics and democracy will get worse from this last week. i took part with pleasure in the action of the national school of beauty and miss, belarus give goncharevich, zoo heart essence of which bring food in the nursery and bring a friend with you. what can i

say, we must fight western ideology, sitting on the couch with a smartphone is one simple thing. but to say, and then go and do something else, so that instead of someone else's ideology there is one's own mole. this is completely different. dear belarusians. do, my name is igor tour. it was my propaganda what norms are valid today and for what period they are fixed today the norm is valid, firstly, i want to immediately to make a reservation that we will be talking about goods for various purposes, forwarded by international postal items, in relation to them today there is a norm of 1,000 euros, as

for the self-contained norm and e, 31 kg, respectively, this norm was extended by decisions of the eurasian commission. a-a until the end of march 2023, and in case no changes are made. it will be changed to 200 euros and 31 kg, respectively, except for the cost of the norm and the weight norm of 31 kg. there is a limitation. e. i mean certain prohibitions and restrictions on the transfer of certain categories of goods, and in particular, of course, e basics. this is a ban on the transfer of weapons of all its components of narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, including, e, including in medicines, as well as a ban on the transfer of alcoholic products, tobacco products, smoking mixtures, potent. uh, hmm explosives are a destructive zone, and

goods, uh, which are subject to rapid deterioration, this is an incomplete list, and all information regarding, of prohibited and restricted goods is posted on the website of the state customs committee, as well as on the website of the national operator hacked mail, because these prohibitions are introduced not only by customs legislation, but also by the legislation of the universal postal union. in addition , restrictions from other regulatory authorities may apply, for example , this is m-m seed products, which are very relevant forwarding by our citizens. basil period. it is also limited by the green ordinances of phytosanitary veterinary control, in in particular, the shipment of these seeds must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate. it was previously stated that the norms will be reduced from october 1. why was the decision made to extend the validity of higher elements, and on september 23, the eurasian economic commission on its council made this decision; it was due

only to support the population in the face of sanctions pressure and avoid a possible shortage of essential goods. but in which countries are belarusians, for example, most often send parcels and from which countries the shipment comes to us, but the priority direction when sending parcels by our citizens is the united states of america canada and also the eu countries , in principle, hmm, it is trade online trade orders from online stores, and private parcels are also received from eu countries as well as israel and canada, including yes, and if any restrictions on sending or receiving, here are parcels from any countries. that's what concerns geography today.