this given decision was due only to support the population in the face of sanctions pressure and avoid a possible shortage of essential goods. well , to which countries do belarusians, for example, most often send parcels and from which countries the shipment comes to us, but the priority direction, and when sending parcels, our citizens are the united states of america, canada and also the strange european union, and the parcels that receive e, citizens republic of belarus are mainly sent from people's republic of china is, in principle, hmm, it is online trade orders from online stores, and private parcels are also received and eu countries as well as israel canada , including yes, and if there are any restrictions on sending or receiving, here are the parcels from which or countries. that's what concerns geography today, and customs legislation,

as well as other regulations, and does not provide for any restrictions for the shipment of goods relative to countries. that is, wherever you want can you send it please. 16 selected teams and they are all unique welcome to the game who will take the main prize and give odds to the fireman, only one of them will become better, they will show not in words but in deeds who are the heroes of our time, and i have strong hands and strong character. i don't stand a chance for anyone. i want to try myself in fire rescue sports, because it is noble and interesting, watch

the sports and entertainment show heroes on our tv channel.

here it is impossible to write the script in one of the programs, the team that scored all one point per skillfully framed the opposing team. don't look for justice here. she is not here, because you don’t know how the participants will answer and when the tower falls, what kind of tulip flower is this? you

have time to think, i'm not, tulip tulips, north star. you ask me, i say that in order to win it is desirable to have not only knowledge, but also spatial thinking. who is the author? we mentally feel each other we mentally feel each other, how does the advertising slogan sound, watch the intellectually entertaining project tower on our tv channel. removed from the city mitusnik here is your face and your strength. truth before the cop. forgive yourself. for

being willing and tearing off a special one. she got wet, tell me the elements. dermal croc and one not with nature wild sentinel one hello we greet everyone who is now with us with great pleasure. i welcome the guests of today's program. bring it now until you get there,

therefore, in the process of talking, you will still join us on one of the respected interlocutors, but we will not waste time, because the topic we will go a lot in order, and from the past , who is the csto, who is now still in the information flow, i remember. this phrase will be set on fire along the entire perimeter of russia; here we see belarus in the twentieth year in central asia, the south caucasus, of course, all our attention. now chained to trying. for now, i will formulate attempts to resolve the conflict between armenia and azerbaijan in this way is a long history, and the price is already thousands of lives. we saw that at the recent csto summit. e has been achieved an agreement that in the near future there will be a meeting of the leaders of armenia and azerbaijan, mediated by the president of the russian federation, this meeting took place in sochi on monday. there, and vladimir putin announced the following peace treaty between yerevan and baku there is no yet, but there are

prerequisites that indicate that the path to a settlement between baku and yerevan has been found. here is vadim in your opinion. here it all looks like in the direction of those close to reconciliation. but how stable is it? and what are the factors stabilizing and de-staging factors of what is happening between armenia and azerbaijan, if we talk about armenia and azerbaijan, then we understand that as a result of the fact that russia today has significantly concentrated its efforts on its special military operation. the positions of the csto have become less strong. this is an objective fact that less powerful turkey has increased its influence in the region significantly. on all issues of the middle east, turkey has slightly different views on the issues of the north caucasus. this one here is the meeting. we see that the parties have almost come to some kind of compromise solution,

but we need to understand what is the most important nuance. eh, what will ours be for? how do we say push? uh, opponents after all, and in what? well, you have to understand the fundamental problem, where does the problem come from , because a dkb was formed after the collapse of the union and the countries came. uh, in the formation of the csto with different problems after all. hmm uh, with different views on development on the one hand. we had a common market. general defense policy. this is us fled to the other side. the country was also looking at another development option. what do you think, looking at how pashinyan and aliyev behave even at this meeting in sochi, hmm, the parties are determined to resolve this conflict at the negotiating table, or each of them holds some cards literally speaking, yes, in order to play them at the right time, it’s profitable for yourself to put them away, you understand one thing. you

know there is a nuance. it's still such that you broke up the union, but uh, the union broke up, but the parties are all sides of the csto. they came. uh, russia, unfortunately, has not managed to become absolutely absolute centripetal force, uniting the csto in many ways and its role. there, the decisive and decisive, that is, the strongest, state of the csto. for example, yes, it is still specifically them today. let's remember the meeting of the president with the secretary general of the tkb, stanislav obligator, where the topic is, of course, azerbaijan's armenia was central, please end the war. it is clear what ended in the parties decided that a mediator is needed, this is the norm of a classic. oh, of course it is russia turned to russia russia landed hundreds of people there, remember how russian border guards flew planes, as putin said, is located on all sections of the border from turkey to iran there and between armenia and azerbaijan, and so on. well, what else do you need? e, let them work in this direction. it was not

in vain that i said that it was going on, a certain game. i understand what game. why did they drag him into the european union , why drag the obes-e there. well, why? well, it ’s understandable, why will they do anything there, if there is already , uh, an intermediary and another csto should be pulled there, like there's nothing else to do. why is the west so stuffed into intermediaries for them, is it really necessary to close this project called anti-russia, or there are some other goals in this regard. the west is not only now accepting attempts. here, learning to participate in this settlement, and what we see today is the continuation of these programs that were, uh, previously announced, but today we are paying closer attention to their initiatives, because we are asking a quite logical question. what did they come with?

do they really want to resolve this conflict? or do they have some additional additional motivation, and unfortunately we have a negative answer to this question, because we see more additional hidden motivation. and what about the a anti russian project, which they want to close? yes, they say a lot about this, but i do not agree with uh, here you are. uh, in particular, in the fact that russia has weakened its position without russia, and the rest, as it were, the situation in the region is not settled. that's what we we are talking about weakening, what criteria we are guided by. this is a very, very difficult question. but will it be possible to close it, and if at all such plans for an anti-russian project? i think that for sure they are in theory, but putting them into practice at any stage, especially today, it

is very, very difficult, if you have a strong player in the region, a powerful economy and military group, turkey is natural. you are getting weaker, but i say it again, this does not mean that the role of russia is decisive the settlement of this conflict, it remains, and the main thing is that it is a peacekeeping force in this region, for which it can be able to try on, and the republic is the russian federation, we pay tribute to russia, but here, unfortunately. there is a fact that today certain positions of russia and forces are diverted. this is a fact and we will be dried up toss. this means that we must naturally allow the appropriate nuances in order to kindle this conflict, and they will not be peacekeepers. they will rekindle this conflict, when viewed from a historical point of view, again this is a traditional policy. when they aspire to the west, these are the possible peace treaties, agreements that are unprofitable for them in every possible way to prevent their conclusion and kindle them. this is, uh, a wave of conflicts along the perimeter of

the russian federation from my point of view. this is quite obvious for this. and it is necessary to involve the european union and others there, which means european structures that will never work to pay off this azerbaijani conflict, because it a priori, it is beneficial, unlike the russian federation , and from my point of view, the russian federation has once again demonstrated its strong position, the negotiations in sochi have yielded certain results, and i think that neither the peoples of azerbaijan nor the peoples of armenia are interested. in the continuation of this conflict. it is necessary to look for a normal peaceful way of regulation. let's just sort it out, well, firstly, i wanted to indicate to the audience that a hygen has joined us. here is one franchise. we are just an intermediary now we are talking in the country of the west, which we are now trying to impose and i quote my friendship a specific example, the previous october 6 in prague actually agreed to host the eu leaders, but they agreed to host an observation mission in armenia. one of the authors of this project is macron, and a week later he openly stated that the azerbaijanis initiated the karabakh war and allegedly.

russia helped him in this in order to weaken armenia, so they have a very clear position regarding what is happening between armenia and azerbaijan, that such a wife is clear, because, therefore, the statement from there was a lot of such a macron obviously about the armenian one. uh, judgments and experts. why was it needed? well , some people think that historical france will support armenia. i think that this is not a matter of historical ones. eh moments. it's uh, here are the experts. on the one hand, they said an attempt to annoy russia, he is a macron in the same statement very sharply appreciated the negative, as he said, the role of the russian federation in this regulation, and on the other hand, the macron, uh, is frantically trying to take the place of the main european politician. here he climbs into various situations. this is not only karabakh. here, there is, like, he has statements to the balkans, and in his position on ukraine, he is trying to become such a locomotive as the main european politician. this is his priority task. we e it is quite, apparently, when the question arises.

is it possible for countries like france to guarantee peace? here you need to look at what president alexander lukashenko said. indeed, in the post-soviet space there is only one scheme for resolving any conflict disputes and discussions when two parties agree. even despite the stereotypes. eh, they have some prejudices. all of them are members of the commonwealth of independent states, at least and only the russian federation has the power, tools and knowledge. and most importantly, the interest ensures peace and security there. because the security in the south caucasus in central asia is the security of the national security of the russian federation for france and the united states, these territories. they manipulative they use them as a struggle for their influence in the world. here is the difference. and by the way, for some positions, despite the fact that they are competitors, but in this part

, russian interests even intersect with turkish ones. look, in response to macron’s remark, lead immediately stated that baku’s reaction was extremely sharp in general, and he said that france crossed out the entire history of relations with azerbaijan. as you can see, i think that we are talking here, uh, to a greater extent. he was emotional utterances and chapters states, including the practice of a crisis situation. well, it does not seem that, unlike the macron, aliyev will very quickly give up his words. naturally, the problem lies in the fact that there is no word for a solution, we can make an arbitrarily statement, but there is no simple solution today , but the question of the peace treaty, and which has been sounding like the last one for weeks and months. e, he is impossible in fact, therefore, they remain in the bottom line. only uh, loud statements. eh, there is. uh, the desire to find some kind of consensus to come in

some point stabilizing the belarusian position. it is precisely this that is not a peace treaty that must be signed. this is not possible today, but in that the parties come to, uh, some kind of consensus, so that they, uh, settle. that stabilized their interests external position. we see back on september 18, pelosi, when she came to a. and firstly, she came to yerevan on the wave of the fact that a number of politicians in armenia made a statement that she could not cope with an accident, that this non-firing pistol. and so, having arrived there, the pilot, and what we are here to say in the us will support democracy in armenia in difficult times. we stand next to armenia when there is a struggle between democracy and autocracy in armenia - this is the place where we can clearly see these contradictions, in general, when the americans say this, it sounds like a threat, because we are all already at peace. we are used to that, if someone from washington or london shouts that we are going to defend democracy, expect a war in this region armenians understand this, after all, if the armenians are not

ready to resolve this conflict peacefully, it means that neither the csto, nor russia nor belarus will be able to influence the fact that there is finally about the collective security treaty in yerevan. i remember when there were still here, when yerevan was preparing there, the eurasian economic union they then said that the dkb does not protect us, as it should. well, you know, this is such a masculine conversation that was at five on friday at the summit in the state clinical hospital. what did you guys say. he let's see how the position differs russia and belarus from the position. we are not of the west. that's the way how saws? yes, we are ready to defend the president, that you said that you crawl there at all, well, in a little different words. but even though he demanded to clobber us around the perimeter, that you are pretending to be something there. you know each other lived in the same country sit down and talk. yes, there are difficulties. why are you wild goats climbing these mountains, they don’t even go. what are you playing. why are you

playing this? what does the farmer want to do, hide behind the dkb, put the blame on the dkb? for what for the fact that from the eighteenth year he brought his country to a military defeat, because the situation is not that the dkb is not defended as it should be, but the situation is in the state of the armenian armed forces. and who led to this situation? a and. eh, there are many examples. uh, it means to indicate some were how they used the s300 complexes and many other things that happened during this war and the subsequent president opened about it at the second moment i and armenia and pashinyan declares. well , azerbaijan is not members of the dcb. so why are you like this are you behaving? well, azerbaijan on february 22, in my opinion, well, exactly on february 22 signed with russia that the declaration was de facto defined - in fact, determining the status of azerbaijan as a union state and the president of belarus - we have the same situation said, listen, yes, the armenians are our allies. we wish you well, we wish

the territorial integrity of sovereignty, armenia so that you finally resolve your problems, but azerbaijan is also a state close to us. so we will fight with him for what, but here is our task peacekeeping. why alexander lukashenko is called the main peacemaker in the soviet space to achieve peace. and now, when such honest unpleasant words and unpleasant speaks, but these honest words are heard. this is a much more serious step towards peace. than some stupid macron declarations, or these empty statements by pilots. let's remember m. really, who as said in this president and then we will definitely continue, please in the end, the republic of belarus and i, as president, will support the agreed decision azerbaijan, armenia and russia reach a consensus. i'm not looking, i'll hold this consensus.

excuse me if, maybe i don't see it that way many miles from this theater of operations. but this is my impression of what is developing there on these borders. i already said so in comradely language, what are you guys fighting for? what are you fighting for in these mountains at 2,000 km, three hundred people were killed three hundred people died, where people don’t live, where even these goats don’t walk. why are you fighting, sit down, you two and agree. let it go russia will sanctify this treaty. but you don't want some sort of game going on here. this game can not be, because the issue of war and peace west is being resolved, and first of all, they have a filigree art. divide and rule. listen. here 's where i started. csto with one formed - uh

, our space was formed on the principles that unite us, but there were a lot of contradictions, firstly, there was a union state with the soviet union, the borders were not normally established, you understand between all practical republics. in central asia , there are questions about the establishment of borders. and the caucasus, armenia, azerbaijan, we are familiar with some american president, he talked about what we need to prevent in the first place. uh, the aggravation of the situation along the entire perimeter of the russian federation along the entire perimeter. but today there is such a threat, and today they will use all means to set fire to several hot spots along the perimeter of the russian federation, the task is to stretch the forces of russia and destabilize inside the political situation in the country and as soon as they destabilize the situation in russia, er, all the cis countries will fall. and the most important thing. i want to say this because it's important. it concerns us. what worries me

the most now, i want to say in response, let’s say to hotheads, and now on russian television i was invited to have channels where the topic is discussed, should belarus take a direct part in a military special military operation, that is, send contingent, that is, already are discussing. look, there are three categories of people who can advocate for this. the first is people. ah, mentally retarded, but we do n’t touch them at all with a fool, there’s nothing to talk about, the second is smart people, educated our people are patriots, but they are a little fanatical - they have such fanaticism fanaticism, it always interferes with thinking, you know, then yes, they are ready to throw everything into the furnace of war . war is not only strength and firepower. this is , first of all, the ability to think, the ability to think and the economy, and the third is agents of influence agents deep implementation, which from the inside undermine the situation in russia, i want to do it again. the emphasis for

russia is, first of all, the main interest of these 208,000 m² to preserve the zones of political economic stability. this is the most important thing and the first step towards the collapse of russia - it’s all about armed conflicts, it will be very difficult to make it possible to ensure stability on the perimeter. after all, it has been said more than once about the same cyst in kyrgyzstan, except for armenia, azerbaijan and pay attention to the moment. he was, of course, ironic when the president asked question from stanislav za. everything i didn’t sit up and flew off in moscow, and then i indicated that, in fact, 3 years is not enough for the general secretary of the dkb. and now we understand why. because in each of these areas there is a very serious situation in order to delve into it and specifically effectively. hmm , and this issue needs to be dealt with, including time and comprehensively. quite right. here's another front. let's discuss it. look, as soon as we see the calls of a knife by nine to save democracy. here they are waking up. well cells like

whatever. you can name them here. he announced the creation of an anti-war committee under the wing of khodorkovsky , for example, in russia it is not an absolutely new idea, but nevertheless, it is now rising again now these anti-war committees of khodorkovsky forums are free for russia kasparov tikhanovskaya with her cabinets before this guaido venezuela, this front, yes or the front line. here is vyacheslavich. eh, that's something to keep in mind. that's what game is here it is conducted so that we also do not oversleep it, but absolutely. clear. what a game, when there is a conflict on the outer perimeter, there should be involved forces about the west. yes, they are focused on supporting these western forces, which is located inside the country. this is a very dangerous thing. here is the fifth sixth column, some say, and their existence must be borne in mind that such things will happen while this tough confrontation between west and east is going on. yes , therefore, it is necessary to pay attention to them, but on the

other hand, it is necessary to open them. show, well to what it leads to is that they hide behind these beautiful words, and there is democracy in the world and so on, but what is peace and democracy today - this is something when they give obama a prize there for the war in iraq , it means the nobel prize for peace peacemaker yes who completely ruined the country destroyed it up into chaos. eh, they still ca n't figure it out. these are the double standards. it is necessary to clearly and clearly show our society so that people can see what is behind these beautiful words, but this is informational stuffing in order to to remind myself or really. here 's something to look forward to from these guys. uh something that you can know what it is, and before you just want to understand. this is such an attempt to create some kind of quasi- pseudo-legitimate government in exile, so that when the mess begins, it would be possible to give legitimacy to an external invasion. same method. you know, there was a jamboree organization called vot jamboree. it was the cia specifically created by the americans, when it was cold. war

unification of anti-soviet groups rebel nicaragu angola, there uh latin america that is the same, they are trying. that's how the methods that were in the cold war are the methods that are now being created from pro-western politicians. yes, yes, our influence groups, because why are we going to hide that we don’t have the people of the russian federation left, there are no people left who are guided by, well, in russia, the same khodorkovsky, the same kasparov, yes , such people are in the minority, but they exist, they become radicalized, they become embittered. and, of course, the americans will try to stake on this, uh, create centers of such influence abroad. i think these are only the first steps, and the next moment for these people, of course, is an attempt to remind ourselves, we see what a fight is going on here, uh, between uh, our fugitives had difficulty stuffing them there in august in this one bag. e

tikhonov's office someday you know, here they have an office, probably they closed the door, and so they still pushed the lettuce in with their feet, he resisted the door, they locked it, put this bald sucker. so guard there with shooting. by the way, interesting, and then, uh, i recently listened to this extremist. he learned the belarusian language from him, did not know it, but he speaks belarusian with a polish accent. here walking it turned out there. yes, the lieutenant colonel says yush, mom, polish words slip through all the time. here's how they don't fade. that's what they are some belarusian politicians. with them, this polish accent will all the time punch exactly the same way as these feigins and kasparov khodorkovskys, as if they they didn’t say what they think about the future of the russian people , their main topic is how to divide russia how to make russia weaken in the future and people see it, that is, people see our people. here we are talking, what is it now, when we meet in the republic. hey, when are we going to explain? they see that evil comes from these people. here they declared about the world

became forms. on the territory of ukraine, military formations are under their own type of command, then their command is not recognized. that is, they reconcile with each other there, they cannot khodorkovsky all the rest. well, who will trust them when people understand and hear they openly talk about how to draw borders inside russia in the future. how to make people quarrel among themselves? read their reports at these foreign conferences where the main topic is. how to identify the most anti-russian parts of the country, how to find parts to stake, what kind of money to pump into them? how to find a leader there, people see it. they feel it, but the danger of these groups in the full sense of the collaborationist groups should not be underestimated. and, of course, our special services are also carrying out our respective russian work on them, which we did not agree on . it developed at the first stage in a very narrow direction against the russian leadership.

federation in particular vladimir putin, and the waves that accompanied it in parallel were waves against the russians in general and today. this is the narrow line against the government. e leadership of russia, it has already exhausted itself and needs look for new mechanisms of information work with the population. after all, even in our countries, the neighbors declared a long time ago that the russians should make a revolution at home, not sit here with us, but make a revolution at home and involve russians in this topic. e creations here are such already quite uh, clearly defined structures. it just indicates that the information that needs to be conveyed at this stage should be voiced by the russians, that is, the year they should send it should be the russian code not western, because western ones no longer work . france absolutely agrees with vadim

that it’s impossible not to pay attention, because it’s not clear. at what stage it can go into another phase, it is impossible to probe it, but western diplomats came to our kurapaty. yes, that's not how it all is, but a preview. so, when we say kurapaty, i would generally suggest that this word should be abandoned, this word was invented. well, the tract is where in large numbers and where this preservation is accepted, you understand, and we continue this myth created there in the late eighties and poznyak did it on purpose, but don't care. he wanted those people who were shot and the nef would not give a damn. e. they constantly exaggerate these figures and why do the kurapaty emphasize this word, because they strive, uh, to turn it into a part of their biography into a part of their political history for them, kurapaty, like the chernobyl way, this is not the memory of the executed and this is not the memory of the catastrophe at the nuclear power plant is the memory of the entire emergence of the combat memory of its political

youth that could lead them. to the power that we constantly repeat this word. we're working pouring water on their mill. no, no partridges. this invented name is excellent. i am very glad that you made this remark absolutely, and it is all the more complemented by absurdity and indignation on our part. that's why western diplomats came to this tract, not the oppositionists who went there before, western diplomats came, the question arises. here we are constantly talking about what is going on, if not openly, then a hybrid war, imposed on us by the west and western diplomats come to this tract why at this time in order to send us some madge. some, you might think, why, at the same moment, when, for example, in italy, the fascist march is taking place, mussolini is remembered, no one comes to the italian embassy and talks about the trail and victims that reach for the name of mussolini. here's how to relate to the fact that western diplomats and

ours may have some kind of tolerance of incomprehensible humanity, when we look at it this way, well, with an understanding of this, or how they look at the holy fools. that is why we allow us to be dealt with like this when they try to demonstrate something to our population and us on our territory or to send some kind of message here, the message that they lay in these visits and so on. places like this. this is again pedaling the fact that the soviet union is negative, this is a totalitarian society, because it absolutely does not correspond from a scientific point of view absolutely. uh, so these things they play on that one the political situation that is unfolding in the world must be opened this underwater. they came there, not to commemorate the people who died, but to make a policy on the spot once again to show their accents. here the west says that the ussr soviet society is bad. why are you focusing on him , focusing on us. look how good we are, how we keep your memory of this tragedy. although they wanted to spit, as it was already said here, the rest of the memory. the first thing to do is to ignore them, they don't exist. there

we are inflating this topic. some handful came some diplomats. they go everywhere, that they walk through the forest, they all went to the forest, and you and i are creating an informational occasion. who knows about this in belarus , today we are discussing the pot on national television. so, the diploma is coming down, and the monument to victory is getting to its knees, like merkel was thumping on her knees in buchenwald, let him thump on his knees, for every folded belarusian child. they are reached through the forest. there is logic here on the one hand that e should not be attached to this of such significance, on the other hand, these are representatives of official representatives of foreign states, and they declare the position of their states on our territory . we can't help but react to what civil society is reacting to. look, you see, not the state until i saw, maybe if he issued a statement there mida yes, well, probably will. uh, let's hope as well, but civil society reacts. after all, those who came there to protest against this parish. these are not just

journalists, they are the leader of public opinion. and our our patriots people demand from these diplomats to stop such walking, that is, the people themselves demand. because if this goes unpunished, they will perceive it as a challenge to our national identity, our national memory, so of course we cannot allow this. but what else pleases me is this reaction of diplomats - this is the reaction of some neighboring states. uh, a hysterical response to our historical politics. here are examples that the belarusian state. i assure you. here i am i look, even the younger generation. i don't want to overestimate the tree. there's no knocking here, right? yes , but it is bearing fruit that we are changing the school course in history, that we taught chickens from the history of belarusian statehood. we have upgraded and are still looking. how is the teaching of social science block universities. yes, uh, a year of historical memory , what we are doing, in addition to implementing ours

, is that we are dealing with negative aspects and collaborators and the army of the region and everything that was here, it just causes terrible rejection, because we hit. eh, that's the worst. here in this rat, uh, rat essence of this pseudo-nationalism, implicated in some kind of pro-polish intentions. we are hitting such people there, we are destroying the basis of the ideology that lay, er, in the attempted coup d'état of the twentieth year. and naturally. we will e we will speak the truth and stalinist repressions. we will speak the truth, but those who create these myths will not need the truth. ah, there are any pseudo-kurapatahs for us, that is, for us, any sacrifices that we made about we mourn them and all the more so since the state admitted that the victims were innocent, but the state did it, and people are trying to pervert this memory, using their political interests with the truth to be careful, in the nineties we

were forced to tell the truth, and we had every chekist whether you understand a criminal or not, and many, let's say, policemen were shown separate great documents. and we continue our program, move on in more detail, let's talk about poland, which has already become such a permanent threat. and it no longer hides. uh, state secretary of light safety of belarus v alfovich in an interview with sb belarus today, and said the political course. warsaw clearly indicates preparations for war. well, i would like to pay attention to the curious material that was published by the belgian portal modern diplomacy of modern diplomacy and we read that polish politicians have very specific plans, quoting the right-wing justice party’s plan to revive the republic of poland within the boundaries of historical lands. it seems to have taken shape long before the russian war, operations on the territory of the former ussr writes this portal, the authors

of this article believe that in the event of the seizure of the territory. warsaw will try to hold a referendum on how to get into the composition. poland please the polish authorities. by that time, the vsu will already be broken, i pay attention to writing about it. belgian edition, and how realistic is the scenario olga i would pay attention first of all to the fact that this is more the opinion of polyakov and not the portal. just reprinted this article. yeah, yeah, that's uh, and uh, it's just a scenario of which one and the scenarios for the development of the situation, of which there are many today, it is possible to see its realism. i think two tracks should be watched here. these are the possibilities of the political track and the military track, if we are talking about the military track for poland in particular, then that’s all, and what, uh, spoke about, uh, the secretary of state, uh, belorussia volfovich and the security council and the numbers that were translated. they are completely

in line with the situation. this is true, but you need to look at what is on the other side, but on the other side. after all, more, being a member of nato and according to her own statement, an exemplary member of nato, therefore, in any case, she will coordinate all her actions with her allies for her. this is extremely important, and this is a military track, as far as the political poland is a member of the european union and the legitimacy of its actions, obtaining some kind of permits is also extremely important for poland. but the position of poland is tough, uncompromising and unequivocal. it is very difficult to perceive in the european union, and the colonization of poland, which warns a separate european politics it is and that's what i printed. uh, belgian portal. we can consider, of course, from the point of view that this is how it could be in the direction of poland. well, maybe this is a warning for europe, uh, what plans are hatched by individual countries of this moment. you

understand, in order to talk about the fact that the mass of these complex factors, today it is very much holding back the speed of movement on the sly. i would like to point out what point, yes, we can talk about reality. on realistic, well, look, after all, in fact, poland has already taken a step towards creating another commonwealth. they also received special rights for their citizens on the territory of ukraine, which is like not a recreation, which means that this polish commonwealth had this first step, they already perceive it as polish actually. yes, at first, as they created in 1569. they were focused on this by the polish elites to impose this colonization on these lands, which became part of the commonwealth and further systematically. methodically from century to century these things were implemented and are now on a new round in 2020. they declared openly that they needed the same whole of belarus, not only on the western eastern crosses. yes, they claim their own, but for our entire territory, and in ukraine they have an opportunity. they have already won themselves special rights and can

enter into state bodies. and this is good ground for, as they say, to come out of the shadows at the right time and make these lands part of the polish state. colleagues in the first place, what is happening, all this has long been described. predicted and it was all planned. listen in order to motivate the country to take certain actions. here think the country suffered huge losses, and the great patriotic war for them it was the second world war. they had a historical memory, but it was necessary to formulate such concepts in society that would allow them to perceive the militarization of the second normally, and form the image of the enemy. set up on the one hand against the russian federation, on the other hand, it is like the occupiers, on the other hand, against germany and reparations to germany for this, the americans very competently threw the idea of ​​​​greater poland from the sea and exploited this idea and are still exploiting it in order to motivate poland to this aggressive militaristic

position. it was not just that the ideal infrastructure for the transfer of troops was built there. it was not just that money was pumped in there and today poland does not understand one thing, that i am building these plans for greater poland. they are a tool and the first striking force that they want to direct the old world does not want to fight. here, poland this is the next force behind ukraine, which will fight. you did not add enough resources to the baltics. they create conditions for the deployment of nato bass on their territory. but poland, from the point of view of the population of the depths of the territory, is ready for some kind of concept to carry out military operations, but for today it is practically. it becomes an independent international entity that can wage war without nato's participation. if you look at the troops that are concentrating in poland and then technical support for these troops, then poland today can independently conduct a regional conflict operation, poland from my point of view. again, this is a prime example of this divide, rule, anglo-

saxon policy, which is carried out because the united states of great britain is not interested. everything in the strong european union, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the eternal enemy for the west - this means russia, those who are in alliance with it, and poland is just the perfect tool that allows you to keep aside both one and the other. another in good shape. yes, and under the threat of some of these actions, they really won’t be, but the facts remain a fact that he is more a conductor of this anglo-saxon policy on the territory of europe . continental, he still came to the importance of the polish politicians themselves and did not belittle their subjectivity. and we see that eastern european politicians, be it orban, and that means the poles of independence, no matter what they stake on, they carry out the policy.

americans use polyakov a. warsaw think that i do not use the poles and these americans. yes they use in their own interests, that is, poland should become equal with berlin and paris, the next moment in the creation of a chain of states dependent on poland from the baltic to the black sea. and they take the caucasus there, for example, georgia, too,

for this they do not need to include territory. why don't i believe that they can hold such a referendum, it's the belgians. and by the way, speaking westerners do not fully understand our mentality. they think that russia held a referendum and there will be poland, but in donetsk, that's who was in the donbass understands that there most of the people sympathize with russia, there are those who do not support it, but a significant part of them sympathize with what do you think in lviv, like this, the inhabitants will go and vote for more. and even if they hold this referendum, it is a terrible dream for them to include the poles in their state, there are 10 million ukrainians, and several million more refugees already live with them . millions of ukrainians, they directly declare. this will be the bondarization of poland, they are afraid of this. but the creation of a network of protectorates all these dependent puppet states, these are their goals, what vyacheslav viktorovich spoke about. this is an agreement. this is actually a protectorate agreement not much time left, but we involuntarily come to

this topic. and the theme of global confrontation. here , at a recent ah, valdai, vladimir putin said that we have come not to a systemic crisis, but to a doctrinal one. what does it mean, in principle, if we say in general terms that we all already understood that the system of international relations has broken, but in order to build a new kind of world order everyone needs to answer the main question. under what conditions will we build it? well, if in general to formulate the general, yes, crenality, it is also about values ​​and about meaning. in this case, it illustrates well who is such a spiritual enemy, not only modern russia, he himself outlined this circle much more widely we go there. that we are entering and so the other day, us congressman jamie raskin made an extremely russophobic statement , you think that belarusians are also aphobic, he believes that russia should be completely destroyed, and at any cost. and here is how he calls his motives and quotes russia an orthodox country professing traditional values, moscow is the world

center of anti-feminist anti-gay anti- transgender hatred and at the same time, almost on the same days in texas, right on the street , satanists staged a ritual renunciation of baptism. an inverted cross was drawn on the forehead of the one who came, and then baptized peregyn to satan. well, it is quite obvious that the congressmen are raskin. this action does not cause rejection. here comes the question. so what is this global fight for? which, if we break it down, it looks like armenia azerbaijan the crisis in ukraine is there, moldova e, serbia and other other issues, but globally. so what does this confrontation look like? here you are for yourself here. here you need to understand that e is a collective west, but first of all, the anglo-saxons want to maintain global dominance. why not fight to maintain the ability to control the world to divide and rule. in this case, at the end, a group of countries arose, but i will include russia china india and a number of other

states. well, belarus, respectively, how an ally of russia is natural, who want to build a more harmonious system of relations between states, including we will figure it out. this is clear. there is. yet again. they are formulated. there is the concept of global dominance and the concept of global foliage. nobody is opposed to having leaders, you know, and also the same multipolar world, but the leader sees next to him strong independent entities capable of expressing their position, which will be influenced by stronger ones, but expressing their position of countries that offer the concept of a global dominance. they see next to them only the satellites of the metropolis and look specifically at salicism . it is necessary to remove the orthodox country, which prevents gays from spending early, that is, the position. here you just took something about it. we are now saying this is one of the pillars. these are spiritual approaches, so to speak, traditional values, this is one of the aspects. but this is a much more complex system. that is, no, traditional values ​​are fighting, the right attitude towards religion is more

, let's say, a healthy attitude towards oneself. and this is this very narrowly this is one of the aspects. this is great. yes , it attracts, but still fights the whole fair distribution of international finance, the formation of new reserve currencies, the correct attitude towards the use of force in the world, which today is not organized. today, the united states can with impunity kept vladimir aleksandrovich here he is absolutely right that we, well, first of all, you need to understand the enemy. yes, and this track, well, you know, these are these satanists, because they have a moronic holiday this halloween . they promote halloween, yes, this reflects what they have, but, for example, they still scattered candies from the hummers. we can cling to it endlessly. and here they are, these whole pseudo-value ideology, as one rightly said, you throw in to cover up their true goals. today they have the same values. they may be traditionalists and places themselves tomorrow, but the same tucker carlson is fighting there in america. he smashed this raskin for these statements and there are people in america who criticize such approaches and there

are quite a lot of them, but they don’t become less imperialists. they are from this, we know sometimes carlson's tuckers well, this is a well-known commentator who has been assassinated for eight years. he will leave such a more conservative america, uh, works, where the focus is yes, in my opinion, yes, it means, uh, and here he declares, but the question is these people, they become less american chauvinists from this. no, because they have a consensus to ensure, as i said, global dominance throughout the world. today they use the same ideology. tomorrow they will use another. and behind this are the interests of transnational corporations. here we are somehow embarrassed by this word on the eve of november 7, but we have already forgotten the word imperialism, we are dealing with global american imperialism. that's good. we are leading the way. now i'll reformulate then look we're going to a

much higher level. well, in valdai, putin said that there is, so the system is a doctrinal crisis. before that, at the twentieth congress, sidenkin. he said very clearly that the task of the second century is to build this socialist global new reformatted state, given the importance and role of china in the modern world. we understand that we are talking about a much larger system, at least in the asian region. well, it was not by chance that alexander lukashenko and the dugins spoke about a just state. then we get the anglo-saxon world and some form of a new just state. in this case, how it goes, for example, like ours. uh, this is the process of building the entire belarusian people's assembly. i'm invested like a factor with uh, fair state. that's how you do it? you see this one there is a global confrontation. i can say unequivocally that certainly the world order that existed until recently. now we are seeing its collapse, it is actually based on the unfair domination of one actual country, or there are transnational corporations that

control this country, but in fact it remains. so they imposed their development path on the rest of the world is another matter. now we are talking about what the world should be a lot of polarity, it is necessary to take into account the various interests that exist in the world. and this world should be more justly arranged. and this is the message of justice. i think it is key, it is key for our history, if we are talking about the belarusian people for the slavic peoples. yes, in principle, for any normal people in the world who do not want degeneration. unfortunately, the fact remains that it prevails back in the west to this day. here are these wildly inertial values ​​that you will introduce the birth of this western society. something will change maybe it is so, but in fact it is this message that it is present that lies at the foundation of these western values. if we are talking specifically about belarus, i , uh, repeated it many times. now i can say that in fact, if we look at belarus, this is the last sovereign state in europe that pursues its sovereign policy to defend its right to decide for ourselves. how can we live on this

earth, with whom to be in union? how to develop and the fact that we have the entire belarusian national assembly will be formed. yes, it means that the law is now being discussed - this is a very important element of the preservation of justice in our society, a fulcrum that allows you to set up in this stormy geopolitical storm that is happening now, because the supreme council is the highest representative body that will unite representatives of the judicial legislative executive power and civil society. yes , that means all these 1200 delegates. they will represent in fact the weight of the means of our society. and these are the functional solutions that laid in the russian people's assembly, i emphasize once again it is a very important element in the modern functioning of our belarusian state, the preservation of our state for the people, this slogan has been with us for a long time and this is not just a slogan. it is actually implemented. yes, of course, some people do not like some things, it is impossible for everyone to be satisfied, but the fact that we

have today the majority of the people. i am sure, especially after the twentieth year, i realized what we have, what we can lose and understand how this must be preserved, and just the same, the entire belarusian national assembly is an important element of this preservation about justice. there are two aspects here. this is, on the one hand. subjectivity, fairness, because everyone perceives it in their own way, and mechanisms are formed for this, yes, mechanisms that allow us to bring to a common denominator. that's the problem in the world, countries want justice, and there are no mechanisms to ensure justice, so one country interprets, that is, interests. one country interprets justice here are the new international mechanisms that will ensure a fair distribution of financial resources, flows, and so on and so forth many do not understand justice as some kind of spiritual concept. eh, the spirits have no morality, justice. this is safety. so, many people do not understand this and should understand if there is an imbalance in society today. here is one group, but

profiting. uh, let's say so rudely we use such a word exploiting another group, sooner or later happens. uh, socio-political scrapping and social systems are collapsing, but everyone is in the same boat and the boat is sinking, therefore, when lukashenka is worried that prices have gone up too sharply out of touch with reality. you see, a lot of people think. oh, he ran into a business, there is no question that he is worried about this business, too, because today you will destroy the consumer with these valuables. tomorrow you will have consumers inside here. this is a completely different revolution. this is a revolution of well-fed, bourgeois, who were trained from the outside in intelligence. coups and revolutions are the most dangerous and here this principle of justice keeps us in balance. thank you, i did speak about the discussion of doctrinal changes in the two districts. it's wide and narrow. here, in a wide circle, what we are seeing now is that the masks are being torn off, we are talking about

the fact that there are no rules, everything is broken, everyone reveals some kind of secret desires, dirty deeds. yes, we revealed the cards of everyone laid out on the table. and what do we have in a narrow circle it was very noticeable from the performances at the valdai circle a in a narrow circle said vladimir putin about which we are talking, including the conclusion that we can draw. this is not a new world. we cannot create it today, because the new world. you correctly asked the question of the core, what will be the core of this new world, and to create the core today under these conditions. it's just unrealistic that we can't. institute of tonic work that was done after the terrible conflict of the 20th century world war ii in order to launch some new mechanisms. we must use the good that we have right and justice i disagree with you justice is insecurity. this is

an opportunity for development. we must move forward, and security. we can each provide for ourselves in our cocoon first in one cocoon. and secondly, all international mechanisms developed after the second world war are under the control of the united states and international financial systems. and he understands why we do not work these mechanisms of justice to transfer the philosophical to the real benefit. you see, philosophy, it has and practically, the change pleases, as the discussion of the law is going on in the entire belarusian people's assembly. first , people perceive the idea. there are practically no critical remarks, this body is not needed. yes, it's easy to explain, but specific remarks go, but oh, that, uh. people want the role of labor collectives to be increased. they are more broadly than the authors of the law understand, civil society is our patriotic civil society, which has been formed since the twentieth year. they ask questions. and this destroys the myth created enemy propaganda, but for some kind of dictatorship, such

democratic processes and the discussion of the adoption of the constitution now, the discussion of the law of the ovns is very important and important now that the state power hears the people, these are the comments that are being made. and i am sure that it will be so, which is introduced during the discussion of the law on the entire belarusian people's assembly. and we see how, in the course of this, even those comments that are made by the entire belarusian people's assembly are included in the discussions. it gains legitimacy. the most important the trust of the people. we saw this already in february 21 , when it actually ended this difficult period and opened the page for a gradual political one. information from belarus but now this discussion once again emphasizes how mature our society is, it is taking steps towards the authorities and the authorities are taking steps towards the citizens. well , thank you very much for participating in this conversation. on the one hand, it turned out to be diverse, and on the other hand, one way or another, we moved on to the main thing, this creation, or at least

keeping the focus of attention on a just state ensuring security, which will not be exclusively local, but we really would like nothing global in the present. thank you very much for today.