there is also iran yes, but there are also internal contradictions. that's as far as it's possible, for them or still not even affordable, we'll say so at their opportunity. i would emphasize here that the americans do not act directly while they are dragging chestnuts from the fire, not the americans. they howl, ukrainians will fight taiwanese. they will fight with anyone else, but they themselves are not engaged in proxy aggression with proxy aggression. proxy war and here, uh, for them, that for them they print dollars, they inflate it, but the whole world pays for this inflation. that is, until we change our world international financial system and create at least a parallel alternative, the americans will be able to finance their aggressive actions at the expense of the whole world, and we

should not have an illusion here. so i, among other things, spoke about the collective east, but what does the collective east of its nato lack, its imf and the world bank, until this collective east does not exist. we can talk a lot about him, but we can do little. brix is ​​not of course, not the collective east, but it can become the basis of this new center. it can become one if it turns from a club of multipolarity lovers into a real functioning functioning system, at least like the g7. like the same, if not nato, then a conditional collective smell, until i see it, capable of making and defending a single decision. yes, the institutions that promote it, as long as it is a club of interest. come on, look, congressman, democrat,

jami ruskin. he expressed the opinion that scandalous so little that russia should be destroyed because of ideology, orthodoxy yes and traditional values. look, the raskin has russian roots. he is from the state of marilyn yes, and there he ensured the legalization of marijuana, ensured the adoption of the law and promoted the interests of lgbt yes, it is in maryland that the nazis zazov speak to schoolchildren in front of children, and before that they went to a television show where they talked about azov and about what is happening in ukraine from their point of view. here we are often reproached that the propaganda of the belarusian propaganda in including she invents and thinks. yes, and so these are just ken and the azov. it would be necessary to invent if they weren’t there, but they are here , in your opinion, his statement. it's just a frozen element. one of the many or russophobia

becomes such an ideology of the new ideology of fascism is liberal fascism, like john golberg in his book liberal fascism, because they are not up to obama says. this is an american political scientist , a political publicist, who wrote this wonderful book back in 2012, where demonstrated the structural similarity of modern globalist left-liberal discourse. what is promoted by part of the democratic party. her establishment is what promotes green, which was once for world peace, and now ready to kill the last person in the name of human rights. yes, that is, we uh face a certain globalist deformation here, when, uh, globalism and left-liberal values ​​become higher than

human values. the tradition of any pluralism, liberal globalism says, there is a single norm of liberalism. but there are other pathologies. they can be solved by what methods and sanctions b yugoslav libyan there, uh, iraqi afghan scenario, well, yes, we will destroy human rights in afghanistan, we did not bring, but we brought afghanistan out of the club, in general , some hmm countries that can do something make. we got livia out of the club. these are the countries they do not interfere with us. yes, there are people dying. well, this is different. of course, to speak, so raskin is definitely a slice of aggressive left-liberal rhetoric. uh, estelesh of the world, right? uh, for example, bernard henri levy yes, a philosopher who philosophical

methodologically justifies this aggression. this is violence, and, uh, in my opinion, in a very , uh, hmm, pompous, snobbish tone. why, if earlier the west spoke for it exclusively. now it is their doctrine of exclusivity, and they are ready to fight for this value of exclusivity to the last. there is an asian belarusian, a ukrainian russian, any other, except for themselves, and they are right, this racism cultural plan. they are promoting. this is a certain ideology and justification of neo-colonialism by other methods. yes. today they do not capture countries, but they do not capture their financial systems in these countries. they are taking over technology. they cover their markets and it is their task to sell us their task, to force us

to listen, watch uh and have fun, as they say, and live according to their patterns, which, well, before they did not dare to speak out so directly, that is, there was no such public. well, let's just say that i don't give a damn about the opinion of everyone else, e message and the frank message is not overwhelmed by anything. if the same live let's speak directly, and sour the same and very many, uh, they said. well, what needs to be destroyed? yes, and churchill spoke out. what is a sin to conceal about the fact that russia should be destroyed, yes, but it was not so cynical when communicating with nazism. yes, as an ideology, that is, nazism is superior one time, it is different, or specifically one time. which must be destroyed. in any case, not just the state destroyed must be destroyed once. here we

we see a curious moment that the forty-fifth year has passed about him in the west. ultimately forgotten. let's face it, they're called facts, there's nothing holding them back. they completely restored what was before the forty-fifth year, but this one is a colonialism of the direct sense of the british sense. if you like, if we take the british journalism of the 19th century and read it, we will see how the british even hated the irish, calling them more disgusting, and white monkeys, than africans. now it has passed into a shell like this cultural value of russia why has this

aggravation happened now, because it happened? the crisis of the world system is their globalization, it has broken yet broken, if we remember the seventh year of the eighth , speculative, global capitalism according to the western scenario, it turned out to be ineffective. but they had every chance after the ninety-first year to make a unipolar world. what they wanted, they turned bombed. uh, they imposed sanctions and were unpunished, but no one interfered with them, but it turned out that they were hindered by the system that they themselves offer. one crisis the eighth year, then the thirteenth year the crisis is now a new crisis twentieth twentieth us to improve the situation today. uh, in fact, the next anniversary of the first jewish pogrom in germany in the thirty-eighth year from 9 to the tenth, 90 jews were destroyed,

then. yes, this was only the beginning of the holocaust. but then the nazis, they openly outlined the criteria. yes , the jews must be destroyed, the slavs must be destroyed, and the world must be checked. true flights now you are talking about value characteristics as criteria. yes a this is what the values ​​of the new superman are: individualism, egoism. that is, the individual must be atomic, separated from some social solidary ties, the second moment, he must share the ideas of actually dividing himself by gender according to unconscious consciousness, that is, the word individual, indivisible, it loses its meaning. uh, the meaning of the devidu of the

ultimately divisible elite dream of recording consciousness on the matrix, if we listen to the harari of the same and other representatives. elite western is their task, that is, to turn a person out of a person. i wouldn't call it superman. because in our tradition, the superman is a little different, who manages, and the subman, who is controlled by the program, is less on the internet. that is, we must become new to them on the internet, of course, because the consumption that we will produce is within controlled limits. it will be planned for this electronic system, it will be fully provided contrary to or beyond our desires, you understand the most interesting thing that i agree.