it is different who creates new ethics and new information trends, and who benefits from it, no matter how strange it may sound to someone, but there is documented evidence of this and these plans have been hatched secretly for many years and were not voiced out loud. and these are proven facts. or is this another ksenia lebedeva will tell you in detail about the phenomenon of double standards. and how they work in the project. this is different. do not miss it on belarus 24 tv channel. valeria knows about horses not really. and what does eugene think, in general, i answered, yes, but on actually no. you wanted to deceive us elena as you answered the question, but i already doubt it. it is right to doubt. it is useful for a person with critical thinking. in this case, this is what influences, whether then questions for schoolchildren

will be answered, to which even adults will hardly give oh , it’s not evening, it’s not evening. i know look on our tv channel. every day we experience a million emotions. we can be happy, angry, surprised , sad, sometimes our emotions. we are not subject to, and music expresses our emotions much more strongly. this emotional strength literally takes back, and has already hit. in us. it becomes an integral part of life. view

the secret of music is that it finds an inexhaustible source of expression, where there is speech, music pushes instead of a thousand words hello everyone who

is with us now greetings to its participants in our today's program. well, in order not to waste time, let 's start right away before touching on the topic of the united states of america, which everyone is talking about now about the elections. we will start with the situation around our country. so our border guards recently spoke about what is happening on the belarusian ukrainian border. well , ukrainians are laying mines, anti-tank ditches near the border, ukrainian drones have been intercepted, but in general, the southern neighbors are armed with tight forces, and it is such a colorful episode with a ukrainian armored personnel carrier that boris himself was moving towards our border in the middle of me. hmm, how do you assess the overall situation around our countries? i think that, as they say, a potential adversary considers destabilization in our country to be the main task. the whole point is that if you play long, then russia wins the situation, so they urgently need it. as

they say, divert russia's attention to ignite in belarus so that russia cannot concentrate in ukraine in the donbass, therefore , it should be expected. i think that the continuation of destructive activity outside our state, most likely, will not leave this plan, the invasion of certain armed formations on the territory of belarus, which will not leave, will not leave. and at the same time, there will be attempts to destabilize the situation inside the country. it was not for nothing that the president paid attention to the political economics of his son. it's all about the socio-economic situation. strength is a guarantee that it will not be possible to shake the country from the inside, and when there is no fifth or sixth column there. now it is said that any invasion from the outside is an armed position or those who act under this banner are doomed to failure, and therefore, i think that on the one hand they will repeat their attempts to change the direction of the main

attack, and so on, and in turn our power departments. defense department. the higher leadership of the country will, so to speak, play, try to play ahead of the curve in order to oppose these attempts. uh, tight defense of the only domestically mobilized economy. well , firstly, it is obvious that indeed, as you rightly noted, the president pays attention to the domestic agenda of the issue of prices, but this task is not only for the government. we understand that since the threat is common and the population itself must understand that this is through price issues. across some kind of internal. well, let's say, there the process can inflate this external and internal one. instability yes, relatively speaking, there, like a ship, the water around never sinks, when the water is inside, that is, the fifth column should work, and the second question is clarifying, but still the main threat is from the southern border or from the western outcomes. the thing is, i think they want to give us the

impression that the main threat is from the south, but in fact , if they clearly show some direction of the main attack, it is very likely that the strike could follow from an unexpected most unexpected direction, therefore, i think that the regional grouping will not concentrate only on the southern borders to cover the southern one. i think he will be ready to act in all directions . well, it’s clear that we occupy a key position in the defense of both russia and the eastern bloc as a whole, i will say this, it is already being formed before our eyes, because one way or another, the situation depends on our security on the state of our state geopolitical economic in eurasia , in fact, therefore, china is also one of our main partners, therefore, in this case, again , if we are talking about a long game, it is strategically interesting for our opponent, this is

destabilization. and in principle, the destruction of the belarusian state as a sovereign state, because what we see, er, in our neighbors, let's say in the baltic states, are not sovereign states. this is actually already a semi-colony, militarized with external control. therefore, in this case, this situation will last for 10-15 years, according to forecasts. analysts. this new round of the cold war is even more dangerous than the previous one, because there are no rules for much more players. we see how britain behaves, for example, not even always following some instructions from washington, that is, they are playing their game of aggravating a daring, dangerous game for the whole world. therefore, in this case, our task is probably to think about increasing the armed forces, that we must have a powerful army, especially as a counterbalance to what the poles are planning. we know them in plans to bring in 1930, yes, 300,000 armed forces well, of course, mobilization should

concern not only the military, not only the economy. we are moving from sanctions to such a regime, but the main mobilization of consciousness of our citizens must understand that during this period. which we entered, well, i won’t be able to sit out there, say my hut is on the edge. this does not mean that everyone should run there to study civil defense. although this does not hurt, by the way, the poles are actively going and improving their skills. some people just buy new knowledge. how to use the machine, how to adjust some elementary derivative the main thing is to understand what kind of world we live in. uh, what are our long-term goals, they are just to survive, but to strengthen together with the allies. and, of course, minimizing the threats and risks that have now arisen around our borders is another interesting point. we will just continue here sergey anatolyevich, join us. it is interesting that last week the western press. so the russian rocket with atomic filling began to actively scare its readers with such messages.

striking distance to london in a frightening warning to the west if it is launched from belarus that is, it can fly to london in about 9 minutes and they were not embarrassed that at the same time, for example, pentagon spokesman john kirby said that the united states could not. sit the transfer of hypersonic missiles to belarus here. what kind of game is this? yes, well, you know, of course, a lot of stuffing is done. yes, the information war. eh, deepening. uh, i think that's the question that we started with, this also applies. of course, to the same topic, uh, it goes, after all, attempts to draw the republic of belarus into the armed part of this russian ukrainian, uh, conflict. uh, which, of course, we cannot allow, and the president constantly talks about it. uh, by the way, speaking, uh,

regional grouping. it primarily strengthens our western direction is connected. this is with the deployment, and the armed forces are actually nato strengthens this flank and, of course, we are talking about ukraine, well, stuffing is going on, of course, about what problems they expect ukraine to almost divide ukraine, who will be included in ukraine, which countries will be in the russian specific stuffing? of course, uh, it's more about it. eh, the russian federation and the intensification of this e, psychosis and the expansion of the psychological war against the russian federation and the creation of an image of such, well, does it sound like a monster? a threat from belarus, maybe they already prepare their readers so morally, what, if anything, we were ready that there is such a point,

belarus, and we can also have our military there interests. well, you know, here you can guess and predict a lot. uh, that's to say, southbound . i would like to emphasize that the president and the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the republic of belarus, as far as i know, are now paying great attention to this very topic, the strengthening of the southern direction. hey, why are they behaving like this? uh, the ukrainian side, but on the one hand. we can say that, of course, uh, provocations will continue to draw us into this conflict from the other side me this is mine. here is the impression that the ukrainian side is very seriously afraid. e of the answer of the republic of belarus if, uh, she, so to speak, crosses this red line, which, uh, the president

is absolutely right, you really reminded of this on the eve of, uh, independence day and more than once the president said what would happen if suddenly someone, if about drawing. attacks on the republic of belarus let's remember this stage. if only you dare strike, how are they planning a chase south down moser to an oil refinery, a plant at an airport, an airfield in lunintsy or brest, the answer will be instant instant just in one second than to answer. in the meantime, here is alexey . pay attention, many, by the way, are talking about this now, because it is impossible not to notice, the fugitives, who are in the baltic states in poland. they have now actively begun to distribute interviews in which the rhetoric has changed. they are no longer saying that strikes against belarus are possible,

but that these will be fair strikes. ukraine across belarus e. that's what i'm here for, i'm just i’ll share my point of view very much, it reminds me, you know, how it was in yugoslavia in 1999, when the serbian position turned, we need to topple milosevic, so we need help, and now you know this, a snag, like that, that the civil society of belarus is asking for nato fire, but i'm wrong or really. this is the game played by running. yes, you are absolutely right nato, in principle, always acts in a stereotyped way, yes, and all their algorithms are clearly worked out. they are now preparing their public for what is called a fair response. yes, and we must remember that not only the rhetoric has changed, but they have changed their ideology and philosophy. they say that belarus is already occupied by russia, and if russia is a conditionally

aggressor, then we have the right. free belarus from this aggression, yes, this rhetoric has already begun to change, about a month ago and actively, and now it is being introduced into western public opinion, but in terms of the first block, which we spoke about e amplification. uh, uh, the ukrainian side of the border with belarus is, uh, the actions that they perform, uh, minefields, and trenches. but in reality this is being done not for an offensive operation, but for a defensive operation. why do they do it? we must remember the plans for 2006 of the seventh year yet, and then, according to their plans, they were developed. uh, the girth of belarus, uh, by two groups, so they are now making this defensive line specifically so that they can look for ours and

our groups could not cut, this one, uh. the shock fists that are now being formed by nato they are in reality, but nato does not think on the scale of belarus alone. their main task is to cut off this, and cut off russia from the black sea, russia from the baltic . uh, cut off the baltic black sea, including belarus, and then russia completely loses its status . here they are to strategic plans for us now the main task is to start active informational counteraction against their western public and say that this is the aggressor. this is what they are trying. uh, change us,

they're trying to start. a new war then it will be more difficult for them to manipulate the consciousness of their public. but if we return to the statements made by the representatives of the fugitive position, but one gets the feeling that now the moment has come when they perform the tasks for which they are actually kept there, because, if you pay attention to these statements, then i hope that well, our viewers understand this for sure, but even those who once voted for these people do not understand very well that nato does not work pointwise. that is, if blows are delivered, they will not be delivered alexander borisovich, correct me if i'm wrong, very carefully. this is the carpet bombing, as in yugoslavia, and there they will not leave stones unturned, therefore, so that people do not talk about what these comrades are calling for. well, first of all, what are these carpet bombings for? in order to suppress the will of the nazi resistance, to hit the psyche not of individual groups of the population, but of the whole nation

, so that it could not gather and co-realize for resistance. and therefore, of course, here the interests of individual groups of people, even those who were once allies, will not be taken into account in the name of more important global figures. here, our colleagues recently announced the results of a closed study of a gall at the institute, a gall. if someone suddenly does not know or has forgotten, this is the american institute public opinion. this information is a valuable replica for us, which shows that they are not our allies who conducted this sociological research. so they held such a closed one. well, apparently, the phone survey of 1,500 through respondents and it turns out what kind of lukashenka and his actions, and they approve of him, in principle, trust 70% of the belarusians surveyed. but the level of support for the opposition is less than a percentage. maybe this is also one of the explanations why these people are now making such statements, maybe this is the only

the opportunity for them now to bargain for at least some funds for their existence, sergey anatolyevich, can be assumed, of course, it is possible, but it seems to me that everything is also linked to the situation in ukraine, to these events, to those forecasts that are given on the development of the situation. and, of course, they go to the usa. uh, electoral and elections are coming. and there, so to speak, voices appeared that they should go to ukraine for negotiations with the russian federation, so all this is tied into one topic. uh, i absolutely agree that this is about geopolitics about geopolitical interests. uh, but uh, specific current policy. it forces them to change certain tactics , which, uh, our opponents are doing, and including this runaway opposition so that it not

only sleeps well there, eats well and travels around beautiful european capitals, which are no longer quite so beautiful after how they got the boomerang in response to the sanctions economic pressure, so everyone works out, let's say. but let's continue sergey anatolyevich either in this way or as a person who worked in the united states of america and you from the inside, what is called understand how the forces are distributed there is really one of the main news of this week, probably, the next weeks among the people's news. these are the elections in the united states of america, the congress senate is part of the governor's pool, and here is the most interesting point of distribution - these are the democrats -republicans in relation to ukraine, what you said and the most, probably, such a vivid remark that was quoted many times on those days. this is, of course, a member of the house of representatives the republican party, margin, and taylor gorin,

who accused the democrats of only caring about ukrainian borders. let's hear what she said, the democrats have thrown open our border, but the only border they care about. this is ukraine, not the southern border of america under the republicans, ukraine will not get a cent. it won't get a cent, it's fixed. this was immediately fixed by the next democrats, because the rhetoric began to change. they immediately appeared when they saw that the republicans were rising on the anti-ukrainian agenda er, such stuffing appears, in particular in the washington post, writes, referring to some of its sources, that washington calls on kiev to show openness to negotiations with russia so that support for ukraine does not fall in the world on the eve of the elections to another wall street building. uh publishes a report that us presidential security adviser

jake sullivan is in confidential talks with russian presidential aide for international affairs yuri mushakova. we are the secretary of the security council. nikolai patrushev, the newspaper reports that the goal negotiations. finding a way to disperse the conflict in ukraine, as well as a dialogue on the inadmissibility of the use of nuclear weapons. it’s interesting the day before the russian foreign ministry said that russia is not conducting us negotiations on ukraine, and then what kind of game is this that takes place against the backdrop of the elections. uh, in congress, not only clients, how to read it correctly? yes , read er, right, of course. uh, it's probably not so simple, because everyone has their own goals, both geopolitical and political, uh, the united states of course is now divided into two parts and we are in your transmission. well, quite often returned to the topic. what is happening in this country. uh, well, now here are the elections in all

likelihood. uh, the congress will become narrower, uh, change color from blue to red. uh, color and it's even bigger. maybe deepen the split that now exists. and in this country, what i want to say, and this is what experts say. they say that if the congress becomes absolutely republican , then biden, well, i’ll say in simple terms, it ’s not good. that's it, there is a speech, it can go, of course, about the impeachment attempt. uh, if he does not leave this position on his own. well, let's say for health reasons. it is not for nothing that they are also now more and more often saying that he is not capable of physically, psychologically and mentally managing such a country, but i would like to express the idea that, yes. now, as it were, this

split is deepening, which can generally lead to very serious consequences. in this state, in general, to the existence of this state on the other hand. you know for a long time. in the us, uh, i saw about how do they know how in this country, so to speak, to change and , uh, what is the problem to use it for uh, let's say for development in order to well restore even those, uh, means the positions that were maybe during the discussion so very tough uh, impartial, but come true, therefore, of course, a very interesting situation that affects uh geopolitics in general, uh, the relations of the united states uh with other countries. uh, of course, the ukrainian topic is at the epicenter now, and uh,

the republicans, of course, raised their rating, they on this topic, uh, of course, get additional votes in congress more likely. he is defeated. uh, it is possible that there will be uh significant. uh, updating the governor 's corps 36 now re-elected governors. in general. he promised that it would be interesting. well, as early as in november, transport, let's say, declares that it is necessary to resist in order for the elections to be dishonest again, dishonest counting of votes, that is, trump continues the line that he implemented a few years ago. e, he, as it were, does not calm down, and this, let's say, is also not typical for uh, the internal political situation in the usa well, in general, it is interesting in general, what is happening in the usa, if so, to sketch about the elections, then the news of exemplary democratic elections. here is here in every word. you can put in quotes. this is a glitch in

the e-voting machines. these are the missing ballots. on sites, people physically. they just can’t vote and people come to the polling station to vote, and they have already been drawn for them, but only in the united states of america , it may be so that they don’t fly for it. well, after that, trump really writes that they say in the spirit that to protest to protest to protest. that's all valerievich how will you end up? uh, the situation in america is interesting because one is in the other party. uh, radical wings, so to speak, take over. yes, we see that the democrats. as a matter of fact, this is the agenda that they are promoting. well, all these perversions are all this nonsense, yes, connected with new values. yes, that is, this is, in fact, not an agenda, a classic democrats, and in fact saying, hmm republicans. after all, too hmm trumpism is such a fairly radical wing of the republican party. that is, the disappearance

of the center, as such, the disappearance of consensus between, let's say, the middle groupings in both parties. this suggests that the crisis will not go away so easily either, no matter who wins there, because neither side is ready to compromise, and they will advance their agenda on an ideological trip, because they already have it there and there . well, such irreconcilable fighters. i know, will it end in some clashes. it's not for me to judge. this is their internal business. let them figure it out for themselves is another matter, that we, apparently, should not hope for any radical changes in american policy after all. i don't believe. here in the statement that they will not give a cent, because if you have already invested 18-20 billion dollars there, it would be stupid not to withdraw this money in some way. and how to withdraw? well, again, trading, trading in arms with ukrainian sovereignty. uh, trading

security. yes, anyway, maybe marketing will change, so to speak, maybe the proposal will change to the fact that they will claim the money invested in any way and trying to resolve this conflict at the expense of russia anyway, it is obvious, so i, frankly, would generally criticize the very american-centric picture of the world. well, we are discussing the american elections so much, but it seems to me that the decision of the congress of the communist party and is much more important for us for eurasia for stability for our relations. and here is what we discuss there for a long time and the nuance of american policy. us at all it is necessary that american politics exist in america; they are in the global world. here you need to do everything, for this you need to win first, but it’s better to win in the mind to say that well, in principle, we don’t care who the british queen is or who is the president of the united states

path. uh, you don't get organized by our states alexandrovich but, what do you think, that's really it. here is the foreign policy of the united states, uh, will it really depend on on who wins democrats or republicans? now more and more, by the way, including the americans themselves, are talking about the fact that there is gypsum, this is the very deep state that, in the end, the democrats and the republicans voted when there was this military doctrine where but it was clearly defined that russia china iran - are the main opponents. and does it depend on who will be democrats or republicans in power? i would emphasize here such a moment, it is believed that the democrats are the party of financial capital, and the republicans industrial capital. and that trump stands for bringing america back to power into industrial power so that the high-tech industries that have flown overseas can be developed in the united states. but, uh, the military-industrial complex is

the most high-tech industry. the most advanced ones are investing colossal money, including work, and after all, it was not ukraine that was allocated money by and large or little money was allocated, the main money went to buy weapons from american companies that these weapons are produced. and they make up. yes, they make plans. uh, already for the next few years, almost for a five-year plan, the production of advanced weapons for ukraine. in addition, the training of specialist instructors for officers is also money for american citizens in many respects, and therefore. i think that there will be some nuances, small details. well, something in ukraine will not be given free of charge, as bender used to say, for every calorie mourned to you. i will require you a lot of small favors, therefore, of course, uh. hmm, a bit more complicated bargaining, but i

think america will not leave ukraine, because it is primarily in the interests of america in the interests of america, so i think there will not be any special changes. alexey and what do you think, you know, i will support the position of that that there is absolutely no difference whether the democrats and or the republicans will come now, uh, all this whole theater is rhetoric. it was built first. uh, in order to drown out the key. the economic problems that the united states of america has in the first place ordinary americans, if you take even, uh, the latest publications or cnn bbc broadcasts there, they give the layout. what problems do americans care about? more than 50% are concerned about socio-economic problems, inflation, unemployment risk, loans and so on, yes, well, crime. yes, ecology is crime, even at a lower level they don’t talk about ukraine at all, that is, the

americans worry about the problem of ukraine somewhere below 10%. but absolutely, and more than fifty-one fifty -two percent there. this is how they live. and why what situation is the highest inflation. uh, if core inflation is now six and six percent. in november, in october, the core was 8.2%, and it is growing, yes. moreover, the fed rate, er, actually zero, has risen six times this year and is already at the level. uh, four percent left. and what does it say about the fact that those citizens who took out loans for mortgages on cars for education. they won't be able to pay , not only is uh, closing the bankruptcy of the largest companies in the united states of america itself and uh, for republicans and democrats. now we need to decide, that is, for the elite. how to calm down this population, but they don't know how to calm it down.

they're trying to fight inflation by raising rates, but that will still lead to more and more people being stranded in bankruptcy. unemployment layoffs and so on from here try. that's how to switch attention to, uh, topics. e beats. uh, from the territory of belarus to london. yes, there is a topic. uh nuclear strikes uh russia supposedly on ukraine to emotionally switch them to a different agenda, what they say, look, uh, your social problems are socio-economic - this is nothing compared to the global crisis, but they are the most important thing and the democrats of these publications, and, most likely, they will lose the most in relation to their people . but we , uh, are well aware that neither republicans nor democrats in reality, as a party, express the interests of the people. they represent the interests of, uh,

aristocracy and big business. yes, but from the socialist parties, as such in the united there are no states of america. and most importantly now the challenge is republicans or democrats. do not give the opportunity to come left or extreme left guy in this movement and uh, crush any protest movement with all the possibilities. everyone says trump is calling for protests. no, trump is uh a member of uh the same deep state uh club, uh who is not interested in people protesting you know support for what you said very interesting research regarding here we are talking deep state deep state over there secret government. and put anything separated by a comma, but this is a topic that is not only characteristic, let's say, of our narratives. yes, when we look at foreign policy, but including the americans in relation to their own state. here, then, interesting data are given in the question of the benefit of the third group. so about the deep state of the real rulers. so

according to this study, 44% of american voters believe that the us government is controlled by a secret cabal among supporters republican party. more than half of 53% believe in this, and according to the same question, 59%, that is, almost 60% of us voters believe that their country is moving towards a second civil war and you are already starting here. referring to the words of the same trump who said, i don't know if this country can last another 2 years. and if when he said it looks like some sort of campaign figure of speech, now again, based on what you said, it looks like a very real threat to the united states of america, but we, of course, dedicate attention to this, because, well, for now it is, in general, the largest state in the world that interferes in what is happening, including around us, completing the topic, closing the topic of the united states of america we looking forward to november 15th. just

wondering what trump had in mind though he announced already. he said this is the year we take back the house of representatives, we take back the senate and we take back america and in 2024, which is especially important, trump said we will return to our beautiful white house. we continue our program here in the first part we talked about the united states of america about the disappointment of the local population in both democrats and republicans who do not really respond to their needs and expectations, and it is obvious that there is not much time for the judge of the states, not only to deal with internal problems. well, to keep allies near you. look, spiegel is written with a link to a study by the monitoring center for analysis and strategy cms, the proportion of german citizens who are convinced of the need for russia to take part in ukraine is steadily growing. i quote more detailed

quotes more understandable 40% of respondents in whole or in part, according to the statement that russia’s only possible reaction on the territory of ukraine was to nato provocations that is, once again 40% of germans think so, here’s what these data say for you alekseevich the impact of the crisis provoked by this war, it already reaches ordinary europeans, and in particular the germans, because for them these cut off energy economic ties with russia are a serious blow to the economy. they understand that this is the trap of germany as a whole europe has fallen into. well , pay attention. i apologize that they are not even so much about the economy. here they specifically say that they indicate nato provocations, that is, they see injustice from the position that they have now taken back in the west. yes, it’s obvious that, and when they told german society what it means

ukraine is defending itself there. well, here are the first months. yes , when there was a certain shock back in the west from the actions of russia, now all the same, and narratives the russians did come. yes, europeans, because they explain quite well in russia, the reasons for the action, and so on. therefore, in this case, uh, i would say that and a feeling, uh, relatives are no longer just a war somewhere. but the economic effects of the arguments of russia and the actions of nato itself and the leadership of military-political germany a. well, also. you are criticized. here we are looking at how much concerted actions of the mead are acceptable, and which is headed by a representative of the green shultz party, who are trying to save the economy of the industrial party, let's say industrialists who, in general, want to preserve the industrial potential of germany and the actions of american shooters

who are ready to take away. this is an industrial production to itself, supplying gas to the trider and so on. well, naturally, the british, who have always been prejudiced against germany for them. it was an eternal rival, that is, it all causes natural skepticism in people to criticize the actions of their own government. nato as a whole. e of the collective west, i don’t know if this will lead to changes, because we understand everything. there may be 60%, then there will be those who understand the actions of russia and those who are dissatisfied. but this will not lead to electoral changes, because the system of control over elections, the exclusion of some really critical opinions, is set very high there. we see what happened to the left party. yes, it was defeated by charismatic leaders, in fact, they were ousted from politics such as sarov genk-neh. well, the party has already turned, well, in such an ersatz in the real left-wing socialist party, which a colleague is talking about, they are trying, but instead of really

serious such revolutionary forces, one can say that they are putting forward forces to the first positions, whom does that thunberg say, she’s already a fighter for capitalism, right? it's funny ecology is not fashionable means. it is a real social protest to create such gapon priests in the form of this girl, in order to essentially continue the same policy further. do you agree, well, i agree, only partly, the thing is that we must not forget that germany is strong, as they say, genetic memory, although they are trying to forget, the results of the second world war, in turn , wipe the general, but they understand that if it is necessary to move further east, with the same e probability it will grow and the threat of a russian retaliatory strike and they understand that this spring

cannot be compressed to the limits. putin says that we are standing still. it must be moving towards us. and in general, he has long noted these red lines. and now, uh, the start of a special military operation. he showed that his words are not words and russia is ready. in the event of a threat to their vital interest, go to the most extreme to the most extreme. i'm not talking about the use of all sorts of weapons of mass destruction there, but it seems to me that russia has enough resources that it has not yet shown to inflict, well, irreparable damage to the european continent, so i think this is a genetic memory and unwillingness to be pawns in this game, which is led by the americans. she forces the europeans. be very careful to this to this question. as time goes on, russia's economic retaliatory strikes they

realize that a military response could be far more devastating, especially since the economic factor hasn't worked to the extent they hoped. and you know in europe now there is such a thing. you know, this is not even a disappointment, we heard spiegel in this material. yes, there is some kind of doom in the soviet fairy tale, what will, what is not will, and these days it is very good. serbian president vučić expressed this when he said we are all we understand who is behind the explosions of the northern streams. but we, i even quote, pretend to be fools and are silent. let's hear what he said. now we have a total of 667 million cubic meters of gas in four storage facilities, if tomorrow they block it or sabotage it, then we will pretend to be fools. although it is not known who organized the sabotage in the baltics, there is not a single politician in the world who would not know, but we all pretend to be fools and are silent so as not to

harm the interests of our country. what can you do, this hypocrisy is everywhere, as we sunk to such as they sunk. well, this is not pretending to be all fools. you know, here, uh, the most important moment is probably this, both according to spiegel, and according to statements that the first, and spiegel is in fact the newspaper that belongs to very strong capital , german capital, is financed by german capital and itself the fact that such opinion polls and the results of opinion polls were published speaks of the key one. uh, a very hard blow to the united states. america in the back. they speak, look, we assess this situation differently. so it does not matter. what kind of opinion polls did they really interview there or just, but they published the fact itself. uh, this is the beginning of a new information company,

which, uh, began to promote. uh, german capital is understandable that he is wildly afraid of losing his industry. e your banks your status a and e. red is recognized. uh, how britain or the united states of america wants to destroy them. yes hmm destroy via uh gas restrictions destroy via inflation via uh expensive money and they understand that now uh they have uh, here. uh, rubicon either they go further they'll just be destroyed. yes, me and well they will just grovel. yes, they will go from billionaires to millionaires. and either they are still uh, they are running a sovereign uh company and are guided by russia, china, uh, other alternative centers, financial and economic centers, and most likely. we are in the near even a few months. we will see even more striking statements from the side of not even germany, but there will be

a statement in france and a statement in italy, and there may be opinion polls published. and this, of course, you. on us, because this will lead to the first, why does nato begin to fall apart? come on, like like a structure that tries to control. e europe, european countries and most importantly, e attempts to see a national policy e, and not eu policies focused on brussels, that is, direct contacts will begin. there germany with russia italy. with russia there, france with russia, this will lead to the destruction of this euro-atlantic unity. er, well, we'll be happy about that. well it seems to me that after all, uh, euro-europe is still under very strict control of the united states of america, even the situation in the united states, which is now pretending to be fools and keeping silent. yes, yes,

yes, of course, to take into account, probably, one of the few politicians who, well, tries to tell at least hints of some truth and, well, be a decent politician, as far as it turns out. uh, well, serbia has its own difficult situation, uh, but i want to remind you. here is a macron's statement to the united states about the new gas. that is it was even the first one like this, well, it was kind of easy. uh, slap in the face to the united states, and regarding germany, i agree that under all under all, uh, circumstances. i'm sure that genetic memory, probably, should uh help germany to realize this situation and uh, most likely there will be political processes of leadership change in germany itself and this should

lead. i am not a germanist does not apply. here , expressing, actually, the point of view, and, uh, this is such an easy turn, which now we spiegel, uh, demonstrates or through spiegel demonstrates, he will apparently continue. e. well, there are already e, and the opinion of individual analysts and practitioners of diplomats that a certain level of psychosis here is somewhat subsiding and diplomacy is starting to return to e, so to speak, this platform and e, after all. uh, policy diplomatic settlement return to the negotiation process. this is the only possible way. uh, so that europe does not slide. let's say in the abyss and the military of some such serious events. here you go,

we found ourselves between the whole world between such a global choice, when, on the one hand, we see a proposal for globalization on mopping projects there is a global reset. what is the right way to translate zeroing, this rank of transhumanism, which, in fact, what transhumanism is is the transformation of a person into a thing and a thing into a person with completely ensuing consequences, and on the other hand, we see the congress of the twentieth congress of the cpc where this is the task of the second century, this is essence, socialist well it is the task of building a just state. we see what is shown about this issue. the thirst for a just state exists in the united states of america in the european states. we have in china in india and so on. but how to build this just state. how to set aside your right, not pretend to be fools, i quote again, but here’s one and not be silent, where you don’t need to be silent, but you need to speak, the day before, in the palace of independence, they discussed the next stage of updating legislation that will comply

of the new constitution that the belarusian people adopted, how it will look like and when to put it to work really effectively. the loving look of the entire belarusian people's assembly was talking about this yesterday, here is one of the fragments at the president's. i propose to listen now, and then we will discuss the new constitutions. we swung at improving our system, without breaking it in any way. uh, there shouldn't be any breakdown, everything should grow, grow and be produced and appear from what is. with the appearance in the constitution of a new body in the national assembly, as i have already said, it is necessary to determine its place in the system of legal acts. well, these documents are comparable in importance to the decisions of the congresses of the communist parties in their time. i also found that the law should contain answers to

all questions on rulemaking, from procedures, preparation and ending with a clear statement of the rules. my requirement. everything should be written in normal language. simply and clearly, in no case should we try on the norms that we create today, all these innovations we should not try on ourselves how to implement this big task in practice, which concerns not only the legislator, not only the executive branch, but also the whole society to implement this concept of such. m-m directions of development. mm. that's sustainable predictable. ah to save, including the state in time space. this is how you see this great work. but you need to understand that the state is ours. moreover, it is based on such large social

arrays. let's call them that and they always will remain. that is, no matter how society changes, the society there is an economy, but there will be certain social groups in the core of the state. yes, let's say, production workers, security forces, teachers, engineers. well, that is, without e, whom it is impossible for the security of some kind of vital activity of the state. and of course, in order for these people to have representation in all government bodies in the parliament, it is necessary that they really be present there and have the opportunity to have their representatives of these large social groups of arrays, like the outposts of our states. of course, they also determined the strategy, because yes, there are professional politicians. it's fine. they must be representatives of the executive branch. yes they are experience. people know how the mechanism actually functions, but without the voice of the people, without a direct connection with it, feedback from it, and a constant one at that. it

must be multi-level. yes, through parliament through elected deputies. yes, through representatives of the yes, through civil society, which should be present. well basically everywhere, therefore, there is direct communication with the people , feedback, so that even some critical signals, because it is better to eliminate something in the initial phase than to say later. yes, everything is fine, this is some kind of, uh, well, buzova is one of the peoples there. yes, they are always dissatisfied with something. yes, there are those who need criticism for the sake of criticism, but still, so that there is feedback and the state can adjust its policy and check, first of all, with social support groups, which, well, pull our country in any difficult situation. wow, interesting, yes. well, i will say that it seems that the issues of state structure are not only about belarus, the world is changing, and it is becoming more and more

aggressive and unpredictable, and in general, the task is to ensure the ability of the state to survive in these conditions in the face of increased economic political ideological military pressure, so the question is how to organize the state so that it can resist these to resist it in this way. i think that of course these are the innovations that are being introduced they are recognized, first of all, to ensure the vital activity of our state in the future. we see that the soviet union was the core of which was the communist party. it collapsed after the destruction of companies even earlier, then. e. the russian empire collapsed after the crisis of the monarchy, which was the core, and now such a mechanism is needed. which would have several centers of support so that it has under it. well, let's just say that a plate has the concept of a geological plate. here is our

country. it is in such conditions that we cannot earthquakes are terrible, because we have a powerful geological plate. that's what i think is the intention. uh, that's the entire belarusian people's assembly is precisely to create this stable foundation for our state in the future, so that no fluctuations crises. that external pressure, the internal structure could not destroy our state and stop its existence. uh-huh, thank you sergey anatolyevich well, it's clear what's going on in society now. uh, broad discussion. uh, the dialogue platforms were specially held to discuss these two bills, including changes to the electoral code. this is also an important document. ah, but i want to emphasize that, after all, to the idea of, uh, fixing the constitutional status. vns. we didn't come,

you know how much we m-m the state spent six vns before and this experience showed that it is in demand, it is in demand by people. eh, especially the last one. uh, a meeting of the entire belarusian people's assembly. it showed that here, on the one hand, it is possible to discuss, on the one hand, strategic issues with the other side. it's uh, here. uh, this meeting is, uh, like this is the symbiosis of our society. what was also discussed here, therefore, it was necessary to fix it constitutionally. well, the president, of course. uh, as a very deep thinker he uh, worry about what will happen after uh, after us he says, so today we are in power. perhaps tomorrow we will, but the day after tomorrow they will come to manage.

uh, other people are the state and this state is necessary, uh, which we created in such difficult conditions to preserve for our children and grandchildren to keep this stability, therefore , in my opinion, embedding the vns into the political structure of the republic of belarus, uh, will be enough. eh, that's enough. hmm calmly. i will put it this way. uh, because here we have gained this experience and uh, in my opinion, uh, a very clearly defined balance of power of interests, who uh? what structure. what does he do? what decisions e makes for what he is responsible for and emphasized the idea e of the president, which he said that in the national assembly a unique decision will be made, a unique decision and which will not, let's say, go not in

opposition, nor in an overlay with decisions. there governments are parliament or other branches of power. why don't they like us china is not loved in the first place by the countries of the collective west because we offer an alternative model for the development of society. and when there is an alternative, then citizens of the western countries, ordinary citizens, ordinary workers can look at the models and say, and we want to say like this, yes, therefore naturally for them, for , uh, those who lead the strange west, they countries like belarus like china pose the greatest threat because it is an ideological threat, yes, and the idea, having penetrated into the minds of the people then very uh, difficult uh hmm to eradicate in the first place if we are talking about justice, because western society we we see it is already unfair, there is an oligarchy, uh, an aristocracy,

they control their people as they want. uh, look what's going on in europe. uh, gas inflation. eh, let's, uh, it will be winter now. well, freeze a little, but we need to solve our own problems. interests towards russia. we don't have that. and therefore, when we speak and the president speaks about the e development of the people of power, then we just create perfectly. eh, a new historical path of development for all mankind and show how it should be done. and it is clear that we are taking the experience of the soviet union and the experience of the soviet union, uh, and china, and this experience speaks for itself about one thing. this is insurance against the fact that the aristocracy, or the ruling class there, give the people at the right time exactly the same as this happened came in the soviet union when uh ruling class, party. uh, yes, the top gave its

people. i just took it in the interests of the united states for some millions there. e, gave e the entire country. this should not happen, therefore, but in the nes, uh, it was correctly said and the right idea, uh, all, uh, categories of our citizens will be represented there, and most importantly, they will be represented, including uh, hmm labor collectives, because here we just visited gomel and, uh, bobruisk were enterprises and interests. after all , kvn is just there on the part of ordinary workers yes but ordinary citizens. why because they see it as an opportunity for their participation? yes, your introduction of your ideas, your e, some experience. that they will be heard and the people will not be torn away from the uh managerial class. well, thank you, now it remains to translate all this into reality, to clearly

work out the relevant legislation. well , to show the need and reason and sanity and initiative in order for all this to work for the benefit of the state and our people. eh, for today. anyway, thanks for being with us. permanent workouts need not only muscles, but also the brain. what is the name of the sport in which two athletes compete. ksenia after all ksenia fencing fencing absolutely right andrey your turn. let's go to the first category. what muscles in

humans are shaped like press cubes absolutely right. everything, just a step forward. however, in this program it is not enough to show only knowledge and activity for which professional club cristiano ronaldo debuted again alexander was the first in sports absolutely right. with the help of what attributes the football referee before the start of the match does the draw? coins with a coin absolutely right, two steps forward, watch the intellectual sports show head game on our tv channel. a program about unique personalities breaking stereotypes . in my head. that's before they hit paper. here they are published, it is characteristic.