again dishonest dishonest counting of votes, that is, trump continues the line that he implemented a few years ago. uh, he’s like, well, he’s not calming down, and this, let’s say, is also not typical for, uh, the internal political situation in the usa well, in general, it’s interesting, in general, what is happening in the usa, if you throw around about the elections like that, then the news of exemplary democratic elections. here is every word. you can put in quotes. this is a glitch in the e- voting machines. these are the missing ballots. on sites, people physically. they just can't vote and people come to the polling station to vote, and they have already voted for them, but only in the united states of america, it may be so that it does not fly to them. well, it's trump after that really write that in the spirit you will say protest protest protest protest. here, how are you, how will it end? uh, the situation in america is interesting because it is in one party in another. the

radical wings, so to speak, take the upper hand. yes, we see that the democrats. as a matter of fact, this is the agenda that they are promoting. well, these all perversions all this nonsense. yes hmm related to new values. yes, that is, this is, in fact , not the agenda of the classical democrats. and actually, hmm republicans. after all, um, trumpism is also such a rather radical wing of the republican party, that is, the disappearance of the center, as such, the disappearance of consensus, between, let's say, middle groups in both parties. this suggests that the crisis will not go away so easily, no matter who wins there, because none of the parties is ready to compromise, and they will promote their agenda and the made trip, because there are already there and there. well, such irreconcilable fighters. i don't know if it will end in some clashes. it's not for me to judge. this is their internal business. let them figure it out for themselves is another matter,

that we, apparently, should not hope for any radical changes in american policy after all. i don't believe. here in the statement that they won’t give a cent, because if you have already invested 18-20 billion dollars there, it would be stupid, then you won’t get some money out of it. and how to withdraw? well, again, trading, trading in ukrainian sovereignty in weapons, and trading in security. yes, one way or another, maybe the marketing will change, so to speak, maybe the offer will change to the fact that they will claim the money invested in any way and trying to solve this conflict at the expense of russia anyway, it is obvious, so i, frankly, in general would criticize the very american-centric picture of the world. well, we are discussing the american elections so much, but it seems to me that the decision of the communist party congress more important for us for eurasia for stability for

our relations. and here is what we discuss there for a long time and the nuance of american policy. in general , we need american politics to exist in america and not in the global world. here you need to do everything for this. to do this, you must first win , but it’s better to win in the mind to say that well , in principle, we don’t care who the british queen is or who is the president of the united states . ah, the silk new road. uh, lookin organized by our states aleksandrovich and here, what do you think, that's really. here is the foreign policy of the united states, uh, will it really depend on who wins the democrats or the republicans? now more and more, by the way, including the americans themselves, they say that there is a distribution, this is the very deep state that, in the end, the democrats and the republicans voted when there was this military doctrine where it was clearly defined that russia china iran - are the main opponents. and does it depend on who will be the democrats or republicans in power? i would

emphasize such a point here that it is believed that the democrats are the party of financial capital, the republicans of industrial capital. and what trump stands for is to give america back the power in industrial power so that the high-tech industries that have flown abroad, they are developed in the united states but, uh, the military-industrial complex is the most high-tech industry. the most advanced are invested huge in that in the course of work, money was not allocated to ukraine by and large, or little money was allocated, the main money went to the purchase of weapons from american companies that produce these weapons. and they make up. yes, they make plans. uh, already for the next few years, almost for a five-year plan, the production of advanced weapons for ukraine. in addition, the

training of specialist instructors for officers, this is also money for american citizens in many respects, and therefore. i think there will be some nuances the details are small. well, something in ukraine will not get something free of charge, as bender said, for every calorie mourned to you . i will require you a lot of small favors, so, of course, uh. hmm, a bit more complex bargaining, but i think america will not leave ukraine, because it is primarily in the interests of america in the interests of america, so i think there will not be much changes alexey how are you you think you know, i will support the position that there is absolutely no difference and the democrats and or the republicans will come now uh, all this all this theater rhetoric. it was built first. uh, in order to drown out the key. the economic problems that ordinary americans have in the united states of america in the first place, if you take, uh, even uh, the latest publication

or the bbc cnn broadcast there, they give a layout. what problems concern americans? more than 50% are concerned about socio-economic problems, inflation, unemployment, loans, and so on, yes hmm, well, crime. yes, ecology is crime, even at a lower level, ukraine is not spoken at all, then there is the problem of ukraine, the americans are worried about somewhere below 10%, but absolutely, and more than fifty- one fifty-two percent there. this is how they live . and why what situation develops the highest inflation. e, if the core inflation was now 6.6% in november in october, and the main one was 8.2%, and it is growing, yes. moreover, the fed rate from e, in fact, rose to zero this year six times

and is already at the level . uh, four percent left. and what does this mean that those citizens who took loans for mortgages on machines for education. they won't be able to pay out , not only that, uh, closing the bankruptcy of the largest companies in the united states of america itself and, uh, for the republicans and democrats. now we need to decide, that is, for the elite. how to calm down this population, but they don't know how to calm it down. they're trying to fight inflation by raising rates, but that will still lead to more and more people being stranded in bankruptcy. unemployment layoffs and so on from here try. this is how to switch attention to uh, themes. e beats. uh, from the territory of belarus is full. yes. well, yes, there are uh topics. uh, nuclear strikes, uh, russia, allegedly against ukraine, in order to emotionally switch them to another agenda,

what do they say, look, uh, your social problems are socio-economic - this is nothing compared to the global crisis, but they are the most important thing and the democrats are the republicans, but, most likely, e will lose the most in relation to his people. we , uh, are well aware that neither republicans nor democrats really express how party interests of the people. they express the interests of, uh, the aristocracy and big capital, yes, but there are no socialist parties, as such, in the united states of america. and the most important thing now is the task of the republicans and democrats to prevent the opportunity to come as a leftist or an extreme leftist into this movement. and uh, crush any protest movement with every opportunity. everyone says trump is calling for plumb lines. no, great-trump uh dick. uh, the same deep state uh club, uh, that is

not interested in people protesting understand the support for what you said. very interesting research regarding, here we are talking about the deep state deep state there secret government, put whatever you want separated by a comma, but this topic is not only peculiar to our narratives. yes, when we look at foreign policy, but including the americans in relation to their own state. here, er, interesting data are given in the question of benzonance of the third group. so about the deep state of the real rulers. so here according to this study, 44% of american voters believe that the us government is controlled by a secret cabal among supporters of the republican party. more than half of 53% believe in this, and according to the same question, 59%, that is, almost 60% of us voters believe that their country is moving towards a second civil war and you are already starting here. referring to the words of the same trump who said, i don't know if this country can last another 2 years. and if when he

spoke it looked like a figure of speech campaign, now here again, based on what you said, this looks like a very real threat to the united states of america, but we, of course, devote attention to this, we devote attention, because, well, for now it is in general, the largest state in the world, which interferes in what is happening, including near us, completing the topic, closing the topic of the united states of america, we are waiting for november 15th. well, i'm just wondering what trump meant. although he announced already. he said this is the year we will take back the house of representatives, we will take back the senate and we will take back america and in 2024, most importantly, trump said we will take back our beautiful white house. we continue our program. here in the first part we talked about the united states of america, about the disappointment of the local population in both the democrats and the

republicans, who do not really respond to their needs, needs and expectations, and it is obvious that the judged states do not have much time, not only to deal with internal problems, but also to keep allies. look, spiegel writes with reference to a study by the center for monitoring analysis and strategy, the topic with the proportion of german citizens convinced of the need for russia to svy ukraine is steadily growing. i quote a more detailed quote more understandable by 40% of respondents in whole or in part, according to the statement that svo, on the territory of ukraine was the only possible reaction of russia to nato provocations, that is, once again 40% of germans think so. here's what these data say about the impact of the crisis. and provoked by this war, it already reaches ordinary europeans, and in particular the germans, because for them these

cut off energy economic ties with russia are a serious blow to the economy. they understand that this is the trap of germany as a whole europe has fallen into. well, pay attention. i apologize that they are not even so much about the economy. here they specifically say that they indicate nato provocations, that is, they see injustice in the position that they have now taken back in the west. yes, it’s obvious that, uh, when they told german society what ukraine means protected there. well, here are the first months, yes, when there was a certain shock back in the west from the actions of russia, now, after all, russian narratives have nevertheless reached europeans, because they explain the reasons for the action quite well in russia, and so on, therefore, in this case. uh, i would say that and feeling. here, relatives are no longer just somewhere there is a war. but the economic

effects of the arguments of russia and the actions of nato itself and the leadership of the military-political germany a. well, also. you are criticized. here we are looking. how many times the concerted action of the mead is acceptable, and which is headed by a representative of the green party, a schoolgirl who is trying to save the economy of the industrial party, let's say industrialists who, in general, want to preserve the industrial potential of germany and the actions of american shooters who are ready to take away. this is an industrial production to itself, supplying gas to the trider and so on. well , naturally, the british, who have always been prejudiced against germany for them. it was eternal rival. that is, all this causes people, natural skepticism, criticism of the actions of their own government in general, and the collective west. i know if this will lead to changes, because we understand everything. there may be 60%, then there will be those who understand the actions of russia and those who are

dissatisfied. but this will not lead to electoral changes, because the system of control over elections, the exclusion of some really critical opinions, is set very high there. we see what happened to the party dellinky left. yes, she was defeated by charismatic leaders, in fact, they were ousted from politics such as sarah vaginas. well, the party has already turned into, well , such an ersatz of a truly left-wing socialist party, about which a colleague says, they are trying, but instead of really serious such revolutionary ones, one can say forces to be put forward to the first positions. whom speaks about thunberg, here she is with us a fighter of capitalism. now now yes. it's funny ecology. this means you need to analyze real social protests to create such priests gapons. e in the form of this girl, to essentially go further. continue the same policy. you agree, well, i agree, only in part, the thing is that we must not forget that germany

is strong, as they say, genetic memory, although they try to forget, the results of the second world war, in turn, erase the general, but they understand that if it is necessary to move further east, the threat of a russian retaliatory strike will grow with the same probability, and they understand that this spring cannot be compressed to the limit. putin says that we are standing still. it must be moving towards us. and in general, he marked these red lines long ago, and now he is starting a special military operation. he showed that his words are not words and russia is ready. in the event of a threat to our lives, it is in our interests to go to the most extreme to the most extreme. steps i'm not talking about the use of all sorts of weapons there.