hello, hello to everyone who is with us now. greetings to its participants in our today's program, in order not to waste time, let 's get started right away before touching on the topic of the united states of america, which everyone is talking about now about the elections. we will start with the situation around our country. so, our border guards recently talked about what is happening on the belarusian ukrainian border

, ukrainians are mining border anti-tank ditches, ukrainian drones have been intercepted, but in general, the southern neighbors are armed with a tight force. it such a colorful episode with the ukrainian beter, who was moving towards our border in broad daylight, boris himself. how do you assess the overall situation around our country? i think that, as they say, a potential adversary considers destabilization in our country to be the main task. the thing is that if you play long, then russia wins the situation, so they urgently need it. as they say, divert russia's attention to ignite in belarus so that russia cannot concentrate in ukraine in the donbass, therefore , it should be expected. i think there is a sequel destructive activity outside our state, most likely, this plan will not be abandoned by the invasion of certain e armed formations on the territory of belarus, which will not leave will not

leave. moreover, at the same time there will be attempts to destabilize the political and economic situation inside the country, it was not for nothing that the president drew attention to his son. it's all about the socio-economic situation. strength is a guarantee that it will not be possible to shake the country from the inside, and when there is no fifth or sixth column there. as they say now, every invasion from outside, uh, an armed position or those who act under this banner is doomed, but failures and therefore, i think that on the one hand, they will repeat their attempts to change the direction of the main attack, and so on, and in turn, our law enforcement agencies, the ministry of defense. the higher leadership of the country will, so to speak, try to play ahead of the curve in order to oppose these attempts. uh, tight defense unity within the country mobilized economy. well first of all it's obvious that it's really like you're right

noted the president pays attention to the domestic agenda of the issue of prices, but this task is not only for the government. we understand that since the threat is common and the population itself must understand that this is through price issues. through internal ones. well, let's say, processes there can inflate this external and internal, uh, instability. yes, relatively speaking, there, that the ship never sinks the water around when the water is inside, that is, the fifth column should work, and the second question is still clarifying the main threat with the southern border or western emanates. the thing is, i think they want to give us the impression that the main threat is from the south, but in fact, if they clearly show some direction of the main attack, it is very likely that the impact can follow from an unexpected most unexpected direction, therefore, i think that the regional grouping will not focus very much only on the southern borders to cover the southern edge. i think he will be ready to act in all directions,

we will hear other opinions alexei what do you think, well, it’s clear that we occupy, uh, a key position in the defense of both russia and the entire eastern bloc. i will say this, it is already being formed before our eyes, because one way or another, the geopolitical economic situation in eurasia in fact depends on our security on the state of our state , therefore china is also one of our main partners, therefore, in this case, again , if we're talking about long-term strategic interest of our opponent. this is destabilization. and in principle, the destruction of the belarusian state as a sovereign, because that what we see, er, with our neighbors, let's say in the baltics, is not a sovereign. the state is actually already semi-colonies, militarized with external control. therefore, in this case, this situation will last for 10-15 years, according to analysts' forecasts. this new round of the cold war is even

more dangerous than the previous one, because there are no rules for much more players. we see how britain behaves, for example, not even always, following some instructions from washington, that is, they are playing their game to aggravate a daring dangerous for the whole world, therefore, in this case, our task is probably to think about increasing the armed forces that we should have a powerful army, especially as a counterbalance to what the poles are planning. we know their plans to bring the armed forces to 300,000 by the year 1930. well , naturally, mobilization should concern not only the military, not only the economy. we are moving from sanctions to such a regime, but the main mobilization of consciousness, our citizens must understand that in this period that we have entered, well, it will not be possible sit there to say my hut is on the edge. this does not mean that everyone should run there to study civil defense. although this does not hurt, by the way,

the poles are active and improve their skills. some simply acquire new knowledge. how to use the machine gun, how to coordinate some elementary one, the main thing is to understand what kind of world we live in, and what our long-term goals are not just to survive, but to strengthen ourselves together with allies. and, of course, to minimize both the threats and risks that have now arisen around our borders. another interesting point. we'll just continue. here sergey anatolyevich join us. it is interesting that last week the western press began to actively scare its readers with similar messages, a russian missile with an atomic filling at a distance of impact on london in a frightening warning to the west, if it is launched from belarus, it will be able to fly to london in about 9 minutes and they were not embarrassed, that at the same time, for example, pentagon spokesman joan kirby stated that the united states could not confirm the transfer hypersonic missiles. he is in belarus, what kind of game is this? the same. well, you know, of course, a lot of stuffing is done. yes, the information war. eh,

deepening. e. i think that this is the question that we started with, this also applies to course. to the same topic, e goes, after all, attempts to draw this russian ukrainian into the armed unit through the republic of belarus. uh, a conflict, uh, that we, of course , cannot allow, and the president constantly talks about it. uh, by the way, speaking, uh, regional grouping, it primarily strengthens from e, it is our western direction that is connected. it's with what, uh. hmm, with deployment. the armed forces are already uh, in fact, nato is strengthening this flank. and, of course, we are talking about ukraine, well, there are stuffing, of course, what problems

await ukraine, almost the division of ukraine, who will be included in this stuffing in ukraine? of course, uh, it's more about it. uh, the russian federation and the escalation of this uh, psychosis and uh, the expansion of psychological warfare against the russian walkie-talkie creating an image of such a monster, which is a threat from belarus, they may already prepare their readers so morally that, if anything, to be ready, that there is such a point, belarus, and we can also have our military interests there. well, you know, here you can guess and predict a lot. eh, talking about the south direction. i would like to emphasize that the president and commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the republic of belarus, as far as i know. now he pays great attention to

precisely this e, the subject of strengthening precisely the e of the south directions. um, why are the ukrainian side behaving this way, but on the one hand. we can say that, of course, provocations will continue to draw us into this conflict, from the other side. it's mine. this is the impression that the ukrainian side is very seriously afraid of. and the answer of the republic of belarus if, so to speak, it crosses this red line, according to which the president has repeatedly spoken, and absolutely rightly you reminded of this really the day before. here is independence day and more than once the president said that will, if suddenly someone, if thoughts about strikes against the republic of belarus let's remember this floor. if only you dare to strike, as they are planning a chase in the south along the

mozyr, oil refinery, airport airfield plant in lunins or brest, the answer will be instant instant just in one second than to answer. we have alex please note many. by the way, they are talking about it now, because it is impossible not to notice. with fugitives located in the baltics in poland, they have actively started now give out interviews in which the rhetoric has changed. they are no longer talking about possible strikes against belarus, but that these will be fair strikes by ukraine against belarus but this is why i’ll just share my point of view, it reminds me very much, you know, how it was there in yugoslavia, because in the ninth year, when the serbian opposition appealed , we need to dump milosevic, so we need help, and now you know such a trick, like the one that the civil society of belarus asks

nato fire, but i'm wrong or really. this is the game played by running. yes, you are absolutely right nato, in principle, always acts in a stereotyped way, yes, and all their algorithms are clearly worked out. they are now preparing their public for what is called a fair response. yes, and we must remember that not only the rhetoric has changed, but they have changed their ideology and philosophy. they say that belarus is already occupied by russia. and since russia is a conditionally aggressor, it means that we have the right to liberate belarus from this aggression. yes, this rhetoric has already begun to change, about a month ago and actively, and now it is being introduced into western public opinion, but in terms of the first block that we talked about strengthening. uh, here, on the ukrainian side of the border with

belarus, after all, the actions that they perform, uh, minefields, yes, trenches, uh, this is actually not for an offensive operation, but for a defensive operation. why do they do this, you need to remember the plans for the 2006 seventh years more, and then according to their plans, but developed. uh, the encirclement of belarus by two e groupings, so they are now making this defensive line specifically so that our troops and our groupings cannot cut, this u shock e fist, which is now being formed by nato and below in reality, and nato they don’t think on the scale of only one belarus. their main task is to cut it off, and cut off russia from the black sea, russia from the baltic. and it is desirable to completely use this e piece that connects. uh,

cut off the baltic black sea, including belarus, and then russia completely loses its status e , not that there is some key e, the powers on the political map of the world become a kind of regional state, which will then be very easy to divide them to strategic plans for u us now the main task is to start an active information countermeasures against their western public and says that it is necessary for the aggressor. this is what they are trying. eh, change us. they try to start a new war, then it will be more difficult for them manipulate the minds of their public. uh, but if we return to the statements made by the representatives of the fugitive positions, but one gets the feeling that now the moment has come when they perform the tasks for which they are actually kept there, because, if you pay

attention to these statements, i hope that well, our viewers understand this for sure, but even those who once voted for these people do not understand very well that nato does not work pointwise. that is, if blows are thrown, they will not applied alexandrovich correct me if i'm wrong, somehow very carefully. this is carpet bombing, as in yugoslavia, and they won’t leave stones unturned there, so people shouldn’t be about that. he calls these comrades. well, first of all, what are these carpet bombings for in order to suppress the will to the goal of resistance, to hit the psyche not of individual groups of the population, but of the whole nation so that it could not gather and concentrate for resistance, therefore, of course, uh , here uh, the interest of certain groups of people, even which once once were ideological allies will not be taken into account in the name of more important global goals. at the same time, our colleagues recently announced the results of a closed study of the gaels, the institute of gaul. if someone suddenly does not know

or has forgotten, this is the american institute of public opinion. this information is a valuable replica for us, which shows that they are not our allies who conducted this sociological research. so they held such a closed one. well apparently, phones survey 1.500 through respondents and it turns out what kind of lukashenka and his actions. eh, they approve and basically trust him. 70% of the polled belarusians, but the level of support for the opposition is less than a percentage. maybe this is also one of the explanations why these people are now making such statements, maybe this is the only opportunity for them now to bargain for at least some means for their existence sergey anatolyevich, you can assume so, of course, you can, but it seems to me that everything is also linked to the situation in ukraine to these events to those forecasts that are given on the development of the situation. and, of course, they go to the usa. uh, electoral and elections

are coming. and there, so to speak, voices appeared that they should go to ukraine for negotiations with the russian federation, so all this is tied into one topic. um, i absolutely agree that this is about geopolitics about geopolitical interests. uh, but uh, specific current policy. it forces them to change certain tactics , which, uh, our opponents are doing, and including this fugitive opposition so that it does not i just slept well there, ate well and traveled around the beautiful european capitals, which are no longer quite so beautiful after they received the boomerang in response to the sanctions economic pressure, so everyone works out, let's say. but let's

continue sergey anatolyevich we are the one or as a person who worked in the united states of america and you from the inside, what is called understand how forces are distributed there is really one of the main news of this week, probably, the coming weeks between people's news. these are the elections in the united states of america, the congress senate is part of the governor's pool, and here is the most interesting point of distribution - these are the democrats -republicans in relation to ukraine, what you said and the most, probably, such a vivid remark that was quoted many times on those days. this, of course, is the member of the house of representatives of this republican party, marja and taylor gorin, who accused the democrats of only caring about the ukrainian borders now. let's let's hear how she said it. the democrats have thrown our border wide open but the only border they care about. this is ukraine, not the southern border of america under the republicans, ukraine will not get a cent. it won't get a cent,

it's fixed. this was immediately fixed by the next democrats, because the rhetoric began to change. they immediately appeared when they saw that the republicans were rising on the anti-ukrainian agenda , such stuffing appeared, in particular, in your post he writes, referring to some of his sources, that washington calls for kiev to show openness to negotiations with russia so that the world's support for ukraine does not fall on the eve of elections to another building on wall street. uh publishes a report that us presidential security adviser jake sullivan is holding confidential talks with russian presidential aide for international affairs yuri mushakov, security council secretary nikolai patrushev, the newspaper reports that the purpose of the negotiations. the search for a way to escalate the conflict in ukraine, as well as a dialogue on the inadmissibility of the use of nuclear weapons. it’s interesting the day before the russian foreign ministry said that russia is not conducting us negotiations on

ukraine, and then what kind of game is this that takes place against the backdrop of the elections. uh, in congress, not only vintovich, how to read this correctly? yes , read er, right, of course. uh, it's probably not so simple, because everyone has their own goals, both geopolitical and political, uh, the united states is now divided into two parts, of course, and we are in your program. well, quite often returned to the topic. what is happening in this country. e. well, now here are the elections throughout probabilities. ah, congress. e, it will become narrower, e, change color from blue to red. uh, color and it's even bigger. maybe deepen the split that now exists. and in this country, what i want to say, and this is what experts say.

they say that if the congress becomes absolutely republican, then, uh, biden will, well, i’ll say in simple terms, it won’t be good. that's what we are talking about , of course, about an attempt to impeach him. uh, if he does not leave this position on his own. well, let's say for health reasons. not for nothing too now more and more often they say that he is not able, physically, psychologically, to mentally manage such a country, but i would like to express the idea that, yes. now, as it were, this split is deepening, which can generally lead to very serious consequences in this state, in general, to the existence of this state on the other side. you know, long work. in the usa, i saw how in this country they know how to, so to speak, change, and uh, what is the problem of using it for, uh, let's say

for development in order to well restore even those, er, positions that were maybe during the discussion such a very tough, er, impartial, but come true, therefore, of course, a very interesting situation that affects geopolitics in general on er- u.s. relations with other countries. uh, of course, the ukrainian topic is at the epicenter now and uh, the republicans, of course, raised their rating, they are more likely to get additional votes in congress on this topic, uh, of course. win uh, it is possible that there will be uh, significant uh, renewal of the governor 's corps 36 governors are now being re-elected, so he promised that it would be interesting. well, transport

is already in november, let's say something. tak already declares that it is necessary to resist so that the elections are again dishonest, dishonest counting of votes, that is, trump continues the line that he implemented a few years ago. e, he, as it were, does not calm down. this, let's say, is also not typical for , uh, the internal political situation in the usa. well, in general , it is very interesting what is happening in the usa, if so here is a sketch about the elections, then the news of exemplary democratic elections. here, every word, you can shake, it's a glitch in the electronic voting machines. these are the missing ballots. on sites, people physically. they just ca n't vote, and people come to the polling station to vote, and they've already voted for them, but only in the united states of america. it may be that it doesn't fly to them. well, it's trump after that really write that in the spirit you will say protest protest protest protest. that's how would, what will end uh, the situation in america

is interesting because in one in the other party. top take radically, so to speak wings. yes, we see that the democrats. as a matter of fact, this is the agenda that they are promoting. well, all these perversions are all this nonsense. yes hmm related to new values. yes, that is, this is, in fact , not the agenda of the classical democrats. and actually, hmm republicans. after all, um, trumpism is also such a fairly radical wing of the republican party, that is, the disappearance of the center, as such, the disappearance of consensus between, let's say, the middle groupings in both parties. this suggests that the crisis will not go away so easily, no matter who wins there, because none of the parties is ready to compromise, and they will advance their agenda and make a trip, because they already have it there and there. well, such irreconcilable

fighters. i don't know if it will end in some clashes. it's not for me to judge. this is their internal business. let them deal with something else that we, apparently, should not hope for any radical changes in american policy. i don't believe. here in the statement that they will not give a cent, because if you have already invested 18-20 billion dollars there, it would be stupid not to withdraw this money in some way. and how to withdraw? well, again, trading, trading in ukrainian sovereignty in weapons, and trading in security. yes, one way or another, maybe the marketing will change, so to speak, maybe the offer will change to the fact that they will claim the money invested in any way and trying for russia would still solve this conflict, it is obvious, so i, frankly, would generally criticize the very american-centric picture of the world. well, we are discussing the american elections so much, but it seems to me that the decision of the cp congress they are much

more important for us for eurasia for stability for our relations. and here is what we discuss there for a long time and the nuance of american policy. in general , we need american politics to exist in america and not in the global world. here you need to do everything for this. it must be defeated first, but it's better to win in the mind to say that well, in principle, we don't care who the british queen or who is the president of the united states we have our own pressing matters and it's more important for us, for example. uh, the silk new way, uh, organized by our states alexandrovich but, what do you think, that's really it. here is the foreign policy of the united states, uh, will it really depend on who wins the democrats or the republicans? now more and more, by the way, including the americans themselves , they say that there is a dispape, this is the most a deep state, which no one in the end and the democrats and the republicans voted when there was this military doctrine where it was

clearly defined that russia china iran is the main opponents. and does it depend on who will be the democrats or republicans in power? i would emphasize such a point here that it is believed that the democrats are the party of financial capital, the republicans of industrial capital. and that trump is in favor of returning america's former power to industrial power in order to so that high-tech industries that have flown overseas can be developed in the united states. but, uh, the military-industrial complex is the most high-tech industry. the most advanced ones are investing colossal money, including work, and after all, money was not allocated to ukraine by and large or little money was allocated, the main money went to purchase weapons from american companies that produce these weapons. and they make up. yes, they make plans. eh, already for a few

next years, almost on the five-year plan, the production of advanced weapons for ukraine. in addition, the training of specialist instructors for officers is also money for american citizens in many respects, and therefore. i think that there will be some nuances, small details. well, something in ukraine will not get something free of charge, as bender said, for every calorie mourned to you . i'll demand a lot of small favors from you, so of course, uh . that's why it's primarily in the interests of america in the interests of america that's why i think there won't be any special changes rhetoric. it was built first. uh, in order to

drown out the key. the economic problems that ordinary americans have in the united states of america in the first place, if you take here, uh, even uh, the latest cnn publication or broadcast there bbc they give the layout. what problems concern americans? more than 50% are concerned about socio-economic problems, inflation, unemployment, loans, and so on, yes hmm, well, crime. yes, ecology is crime, even at a lower level they don’t talk about ukraine at all, that is, the americans are worried about the problem of ukraine somewhere below 10%, but absolutely, and more than fifty- one fifty-two percent there. this is how they live . and why what situation develops the highest inflation. uh, if core inflation is now 6.6% in november, it was in october, and the main rate is 8.2%, and it is growing, yes. moreover, the

frs rate from e, actually zero, has been raised six times this year and is already at the level. uh, four percent left. and what does it say about the fact that those citizens who took out loans for mortgages on cars for education. they won't be able to pay out , not only that, uh, closing the bankruptcy of the largest companies in the united states of america itself and, uh, for the republicans and democrats. now we need to decide, that is, for the elite. how to calm down this population, but they don't know how to calm it down. they're trying to fight inflation by raising rates, but that will still lead to more and more people being stranded in bankruptcy. unemployment layoffs and so on from here try. that's how to switch attention to, uh, topics. e beats. uh, from the territory of belarus is full of up well, yes, there, uh, topics uh,

nuclear strikes, uh, russia allegedly against ukraine in order to emotionally switch them to another agenda, what do they say, look, uh, your social problems are socio-economic - this is not what compared with the global crisis, but they are the most important and the democrats are the republicans, and, most likely, they will lose the most in relation to their people. but we , uh, are well aware that neither republicans nor democrats in reality, as a party, express the interests of the people. they express the interests of, uh, the aristocracy and big capital, yes, but there are no socialist parties, as such, in the united states of america. and the most important thing now is the task of the republicans and democrats not to give the opportunity to come as a leftist or extreme leftist into this motion. and uh, crush any protest movement with every opportunity. everyone says trump is calling for accountability. no, great-trump uh

dick. uh, the same deep state uh club, uh, which is not interested in people protesting. see, in support of what you said. very interesting research regarding , here we are talking deep state deep state there. secret government, put whatever you want, separated by commas. , but this theme, which is characteristic not only of, let's say, our narratives. yes, when we we examine foreign policy, but also to the americans in relation to their own state. here, er, interesting data are given in the question of benzonance of the third group. so about the deep state of the real rulers. so according to this study, 44% of american voters believe that the us government is controlled by a secret cabal among the supporters of the republican party. more than half of 53% believe in it, and according to the same question, 59%, that is, almost 60% of us voters believe that that their country is moving towards a second civil war

and you are already starting here. referring to the words of the same trump who said, i don't know if this country can last another 2 years. and if when he said it looked like a campaign figure of speech, now again, based on what you said, it looks like a very real threat to the united states of america, but we, of course, dedicate attention to this, because, well, for now it is, in general, the largest state in the world, which intervenes in what is happening, including near us, completing the topic, closing the topic of the united states of america, we are waiting for november 15th. just wondering what trump had in mind though he announced already. he said this is the year we take back the house of representatives, we take back the senate and we take back america and in 2024, most importantly, trump said we will take back our beautiful white house. we continue our

program. in the first part, we talked about the united states of america, about the disappointment of the local population in and in the democrats and in republicans who do not really respond to their needs and expectations and it is obvious that the judged states do not have much time not only to deal with internal problems, but also to keep allies near them. look, spiegel writes with reference to a study by the center for monitoring analysis and strategy, the topic with the proportion of german citizens convinced of the need for russia to svy ukraine is steadily growing. i quote more detailed quote more understandable 40% of respondents completely or partially, according to the statement that svo, on the territory of ukraine was the only possible reaction of russia to nato provocations, that is, once again 40% of germans think so. here's what these data say about the impact of the crisis. and provoked by this

war, it already reaches ordinary europeans, and in particular the germans, because for them these cut off energy economic ties with russia are a serious blow to the economy. they understand that this is the trap of germany as a whole europe has fallen into. well, pay attention. i ask sorry that they are not even so much about the economy. here they specifically say that they indicate nato provocations, that is, they see injustice in the position that they have now taken back in the west. well, it’s obvious that, uh, when they told in german society what it means ukraine is defending itself there. well, here's the first month. yes , when there was a certain shock in the west from the actions of russia, now, after all, russian narratives have reached the europeans, because they explain the reasons for the action quite well in russia, and so on, therefore, in this case.

uh, i would say that and feeling. here, relatives are no longer just somewhere there is a war. but the economic effects of the arguments of russia and the actions of nato itself and the leadership of the military-political germany a. well, also. you are criticized. here we are looking. how many times the concerted actions of the mead, let's say, and which is headed by a representative of the green party, a schoolgirl who are trying to save the economy of the industrial party, let's say industrialists who, in general, want to preserve the industrial potential of germany and the actions of the shooters of the americans, who are already ready to pick up. this is an industrial production to itself, supplying gas to the trider and so on. well , naturally, the british, who have always been prejudiced against germany for them. it was an eternal rival. that is, all this causes natural skepticism in people, criticism of the actions of their own government in general, and the collective

west. i know if this will lead to changes, because we understand everything. there, maybe 60%, then there will be those who understand the actions of russia and dissatisfied, but this will not lead to electoral changes, because the system of control over elections, the exclusion of some really critical opinions, is set very high there. we see what happened to the d-linky left party. yes, she was defeated by charismatic leaders, in fact, they were ousted from politics such as sarah vaginas. oh, and the party has already turned, well, into such an ersatz of a truly left-wing socialist party, about which a colleague says, because they are trying, but instead of really serious such revolutionary forces can be said to be put forward to the first positions. whom speaks about thunberg, here she is with us a fighter of capitalism. now now yes. it's funny. ecology is not fashionable. it means to analyze the present social protest to create such popov gapons, uh in the form of this girl, in order to essentially

go further. continue the same policy you agree, well, i agree, only partly, the thing is that we must not forget what is strong in germany, as they say, genetic memory, although they try to forget, the results of the second world war turn wipe the general, but they understand that if it is necessary to move further east, the threat of a russian retaliatory strike will grow with the same probability, and they understand that this spring cannot be compressed to the limit. putin says that we are standing still. it must be moving towards us. and in general, he has long noted these red lines. and now, uh, the start of a special military operation. he showed that his words are not words and russia is ready. in the event of a threat to our lives, it is in our interests to go to the most extreme to the most extreme.

i'm not talking about the use of all sorts of weapons of mass destruction there, but it seems to me that russia has enough resources that it has not yet shown to inflict, well, irreparable damage to the european continent, so i think this is a genetic memory and unwillingness to be pawns in this game, led by the americans. she forces the europeans. be very wary of this to this issue. as it gets closer, russian economic retaliation they understand that military response could be much more destructive, especially since the economic factor did not work to the extent that they expected. and you know in europe now there is such a thing. you know, this is not even a disappointment, we heard spiegel in this material. yes, there is some kind of doom in the soviet fairy tale, what will, what is not

will, and these days it is very good. serbian president vučić expressed this when he said that we all understand who is behind the blowing up of the northern streams. but we, i even quote, pretend to be fools and are silent. let's hear what he said. now at we have a total of 667 million cubic meters of gas in four storage facilities, if tomorrow they block it or sabotage it, then we will pretend to be fools. although it is not known who organized the sabotage in the baltics, there is not a single politician in the world who would not know, but we all pretend to be fools and are silent so as not to harm the interests of our country. well, what can you do, this hypocrisy is everywhere, how we have sunk to this, how they have sunk. well, this is not pretending to be all fools. you know, here, uh, the most important moment is probably like this spiegel, and according to statements that the first, and spiegel is in fact the newspaper that belongs to very, strong capital,

german capital is financed by german capital, and the very fact that such opinion polls and the results of opinion polls were published speaks of the key it's such. uh, a very hard blow to the united states. america in the back. they say, look, we assess this situation differently, not important. what social questions did they actually interview there or simply, but published their very fact. eh, here this is the beginning of a new information company, which , uh, began to promote. uh, german capital is understandable that he is wildly afraid of losing his industry. e your banks your status, a and e beautiful. learn how britain or the united states of america wants to destroy them. yes hmm destroy through uh gas restrictions destroy through inflation through

uh expensive money and they understand that now they have uh uh. uh, rubicon either they go further they'll just be destroyed. yes, me and well they will just grovel. yes, they will become billionaires millionaires. and either they are still uh, they are running a sovereign uh company and are guided by russia , china, uh, other alternative centers, financial and economic centers, and most likely. we are in the near even a few months. we will see even more striking statements from the side of not even germany, but there will be a statement in france and a statement in italy , and there may be opinion polls published. and this, of course, is beneficial to us. because this will lead to the first thing, why will nato begin to fall apart? yeah well, like like a structure, who tries to control. e europe , european countries and most importantly, but

attempts will begin to conduct a national policy, and not an eu policy focused on brussels, that is, direct contacts will begin. there germany with russia italy. with russia there, france with russia , this will lead to the destruction of this euro-atlantic unity. er, well, we'll be happy about that. well, it seems to me that after all, uh, euro-europe is still under very strict control of the united states of america, even the situation in the usa that we will continue now play dumb and keep quiet. yes, yes, yes, of course, in students, probably, uh, one of the few politicians who, well, tries to tell some kind of truth with hints and, uh, be, well, a decent politician, as far as it turns out. uh, well, serbia has its own difficult situation, uh, but i want to

remind you, uh, this is a macron's statement to the united states about natural gas. that is, it was even the first one like this, well, it was, as it were, light. uh, a slap in the face to the united states, and regarding germany, i agree that for all for all, uh, circumstances. i'm sure that genetic memory, probably, should uh help germany uh understand this situation and uh, most likely there will be political processes of leadership change. in germany itself this should lead. i am not a germanist, i do not pretend to express here. actually. uh, point of view and uh, this is this. here is a slight reversal that spiegel, uh, is demonstrating to us right now or through spiegel, it will most likely continue. e. well, sound already e, and opinion individual analysts and practitioners of diplomats

that a certain level of psychosis here is somewhat subsiding and diplomacy is starting to return to uh, so to speak, this platform and uh, after all. uh, policy diplomatic settlement return to the negotiation process. this is the only possible way. uh, so that europe does not slide. let's say in the abyss and the military of some such serious events. well, you turned out we have between the whole world between such a global choice, when on the one hand we see here is a proposal for globalization went to the former projects. is there a global, reboot or what? still, to translate zeroing is this rank of transhumanism, which, in fact, is what transhumanism is. this is the transformation of a person into a thing and a thing into a person with all the ensuing consequences , and on the other hand, we see the congress of the twentieth congress of the

ccp where there is this task of the second century, which is essentially socialist, but this is the task of building a just state. we see what polls show about this. the thirst for a just state exists in the united states of america in european countries. we have in china in india and so on. but how to build this just state. how to set aside your right not to pretend to be fools again and i quote, and here's a votchich and not to be silent, where silence should not be spoken. just the day before, in the palace of independence, they discussed the next stage of updating the legislation, which will correspond to the new constitution that adopted the belarusian people. uh, how will look and when to leave for real work effectively here is an update. this view of the entire belarusian people's assembly was talking about this yesterday, here is one of the fragments at the president's. i suggest now listen, then we will discuss the new constitution, we swung at improving

our system, without breaking it in any case, no word, no breaking should be, everything should grow, grow and be produced and appear from what is with the advent of a new body in the constitution in the national assembly, as i said, it is necessary to determine its place in the system of legal acts. well, these documents are comparable in importance to the decisions of the congresses of the communist parties in their time. i also found the law should contain answers to all questions on the norms of creativity, starting from the preparation procedures and ending with a clear statement of the norms. my requirement. everything should be written in normal language, simply and clearly. we should not try on the norms that we are creating today; all these nations should not try on themselves. how to implement in practice this

big task, which concerns not only the legislator not only of the executive branch, but of the whole society, to implement this concept of such, m-m, direction of development, m-m. here is a stable predictable, and for the preservation of including the state in space in time. how do you see this great work? we need to understand that the state is ours. moreover, it is based on such large social arrays. let's call them that and they will always remain. that is, no matter how society changes the economy there, but in the core of the state there will be certain social groups. yes, let's say production workers, security forces , teachers, engineers. well, that is, without and whom, security and some kind of vital activity of the

state are impossible. and of course, in order for these people to have representation in all bodies of power in the parliament, it is necessary that they really be present there and have the opportunity to have their representatives of these large social groups of arrays, as well as outposts of our state. of course, they also determined the strategy, because yes, there are professional politicians. this wonderful. they must be representatives of the executive branch. yes they are experience. people know how the mechanism actually functions, but without the voice of the people, without a direct connection with it, feedback from it, and a constant one at that. it must be multi-level. yes through the parliament through the elected deputies. yes, through representatives of the yes, through civil society, which should be present. well, in principle, everywhere, therefore, here is direct communication with the people, and feedback, so that even some critical signals, because it is better to eliminate something in the initial phase than to

say later. yes, everything is fine. these are some, uh, buzovoy teras there from the peoples. yes, they are always dissatisfied with something. yes, there are those who need criticism for the sake of criticism, but still, so that there is feedback from the state, they can adjust their policies and check, first of all, with social support groups, which well , pull our country into any difficult situation. wow, interesting, yes. well, i’ll say this, that it seems that the issues of state structure are not concerned only belarus is changing the world, and it is becoming more and more aggressive unpredictable, and in general, the task is to ensure the ability of the state to survive in these conditions in the face of increased economic political ideological military pressure, so the question is how to arrange the state so that it can resist

it in this way . i think that, of course, these innovations that are being introduced now, they are recognized, first of all, to ensure the vital activity of our state in the future. we see that the soviet union was the core of which was the communist party. it collapsed after the destruction of companies even earlier, then. e. the russian empire collapsed after the crisis of the monarchy, which was the core, and now such a mechanism is needed. which would have several centers of support so that it has under it. well, let's just say that a plate has the concept of a geological plate. here is our country. it is in such conditions that we are not afraid of an earthquake, because we have a powerful geological plate. here i think that the idea of ​​the entire belarusian people's assembly is precisely to create this stable foundation for our state in the future, so that there are no fluctuations in crises. that external pressure, the internal structure could not destroy

our state and stop its existence. uh-huh, thank you sergeyevich well, it's clear what's going on in society now. uh, broad discussion. well, dialogue platforms were specially held to discuss these two bills, including amendments to the electoral code. this is also important important documents, ah, but i want to emphasize that, after all, to the idea of, uh, securing a constitutional status. vns. we didn't come, you know, on the spur of the moment. uh, we hmm the state has done six vns before and this experience has shown that he is in demand he is in demand by the people. uh, especially the last one, uh, the meeting of the entire belarusian people's assembly. it showed that it is possible to discuss here, on the one hand

, and, uh, strategic issues, on the other hand. it 's uh, here. uh, this meeting is, uh, like this is the symbiosis of our society. what was also discussed here, therefore, it was necessary to fix it, uh , constitutionally, huh? well, the president, of course. uh, as a very deep thinker, he worries about ah, what will happen after uh, after us, he says so today we are in power. perhaps tomorrow we will, but the day after tomorrow they will come to manage. uh, other people are needed by the state, and this state is necessary, uh, which we created in such difficult conditions to preserve for our children and grandchildren . the structure of the republic of belarus, uh,

enough will pass. eh, that's enough. hmm calmly. i will put it this way, but because here we have gained this experience and uh, in my opinion, uh, a very clearly defined balance of the balance of power of interests, who uh? what structure. what does he do? what decisions does e make for what is he responsible for and emphasized the idea e of the president, which he expressed, what will be in the national assembly? to undertake a unique decision, a unique decision, and which will not, let's say, not go against or overlap with the solutions. there government parliament or other branches of power. why don't they like us? china doesn't like us. uh, first of all, the countries of the collective west, because we offer an alternative model for the development of society, yes, when there is an alternative, then citizens of the western countries

, ordinary citizens, ordinary workers can look at the models and say, but we want like this, yes, therefore naturally for them for, uh, those who lead the countries of the west, they are countries such as belarus, like china, they pose the greatest threat, because this is an ideological threat, yes, and the idea, having penetrated into consciousness e of the people, then it is very difficult. hmm , eradicate first of all, if we are talking about justice, because western society, we see it is already unfair, there is an oligarchy, there is, uh, an aristocracy, they control their people as they want. uh, look what's going on in europe. uh, gas inflation. eh, let's, uh, it will be winter now. well, freeze a little, but we need to decide our interests in relation to russia. we do n't have that. and therefore, when we talk about the president talking about the development of the people of power, then we just

create completely. eh, a new historical path of development for all mankind and show how it should be done. but it is clear that we are taking the experience of the soviet union and the experience, uh, and china, and this experience speaks for itself about one thing. e in the nss is an insurance against the fact that the aristocracy, yes or there the ruling e, class does not give the people at the right time. just as it happened in the soviet union when e was the ruling class, the party. uh, yes, the top gave its people. i just took it in the interests of the united states for some millions there. e passed e the entire country. this should not happen, therefore, but in the nes, uh, it was correctly said and the right idea, uh, all, uh, categories of our citizens will be represented there, and most importantly, the most important thing will be represented, including, uh, labor collectives,

because that we just visited gomel and, uh, bobruisk were at enterprises and interested. after all , kvn is just there from the side of ordinary workers yes , ordinary citizens. why because they see in this an opportunity for their participation, their introduction of their ideas, their e, some feelings of being heard. and the people will not be cut off from the administrative class. well , thank you, now it remains to translate all this into reality and work out clearly, in accordance with the law. well, to show the need and reason and an explosion of thought and initiative in order for all this to work for the benefit of the state and our people. eh, for today. anyway, thanks for being with us.

exploring belarus is easy enough to lay a non-trivial route. this is our belarusian baltic. what snow-white dunes under your feet are cool,

the most important thing is to be open to amazing secrets and facts with a thick green carpet that imitated grass. and now hedgehogs will take a special place in my heart. yummy see the project the route was built on belarus 24 tv channel. what vaccines

do belarusians offer today? what can be used and how they manifest themselves. well, usually we have a vaccine that we have been using for many years, and is purchased at the expense of the republican and local budgets. this is grippol plus russian-made vaccine, which there are also three viruses in its composition, two influenza viruses, and h1n1 h3 n2 well, of different essence, type and influenza b virus, and for a-a paid services the vaccine will be used in october. you are a french -made trawl, which has four influenza viruses in its composition under the name, that is, two influenza viruses h1 n1h32 and 2, the yb virus, there are different lines and rich victorias. we know that we did not stop in belarus, in fact, vaccination against coronavirus but how compatible are these vaccines against influenza and coronavirus. is it possible let's get vaccinated in one day? or you need to observe the present time here, we left.