the tels that are already working there with papers somewhere in the aviation department. you should have seen their reaction when he is allowed to fly there to drink. it's like don't deceive yourself, but you will never deceive yourself, the sky is always already in you. now, if it hit, this is how the most pleasant thing got on forever when you fly with people, well , you land there, how you squeak there, the girls jump out like that. and this is the best work, how i envy you there? well, and so on, in fact, regardless of the fact that there are 30 flights sometimes to do sometimes it's like being tired. well, yes, this is the most interesting thing that works. for me, it 's surprising i didn't even think about it at all. there was just no thought. no, this is what is mine, this is what i need, this is what will be there all the way with me. as much as possible it starts, they still somehow burn with a paratrooper. yes, it sits down there, probably, on adrenaline then that's all. who will

jump you? hard? it's not so much adrenaline here, but it's heaven. yes, it's like a drug, and then it's hard to deceive yourself. you don't have to think about it, but it is worth seeing to try, at least for a second there to break away and that's it. it's in you again here without it you can't.

hello greetings to all who are with us now greetings to its participants in our today's program. well, in order not to waste time, let 's start right away before touching on the topic of the united states of america, which everyone is talking about now about the elections. we will start with the situation around our country. so, our

border guards recently talked about what is happening on the belarusian ukrainian border. well ukrainians are laying mines, anti-tank ditches near the border, ukrainian drones have been intercepted, but in general, the southern neighbors express their strength and such a colorful episode with the ukrainian beter, which in the middle of me was moving towards our border, boris himself hmm how do you assess the overall situation around our country? i think that, as they say, a potential adversary considers destabilization in our country to be the main task. the thing is that if you play long, then russia wins the situation, so they urgently need it. as it is said to divert russia's attention to ignite in belarus so that russia cannot concentrate in ukraine in the donbass, therefore , it should be expected. i think that the continuation of destructive activity outside our state, most likely, will not leave this plan, the invasion of certain

armed formations on the territory of belarus, which will not leave, will not leave. and at the same time, there will be attempts to destabilize the political and economic situation inside the country, it was not for nothing that the president drew attention to his son. the whole point is that socio-economic situation. strength is a guarantee that it will not be possible to shake the country from the inside, and when there is no fifth or sixth column there. as they say now, any invasion from the outside, these are armed positions or those who act under this banner, it is doomed to failure, and therefore, i think that on the one hand, they will repeat their attempts to change the direction of the main attack, and so on and in their own the turn of our law enforcement agencies is the ministry of defense. the higher leadership of the country will, so to speak, play try to play ahead of the curve in order to counter these attempts. uh, tight defense unity within

the country mobilized economy. well, firstly , it is obvious that indeed, as you rightly noted, the president pays attention to the domestic agenda of the issue of prices, but this task is not only for the government. we understand that since the threat is common and the population itself must understand that this is through price issues. through internal ones. well, let's say, processes there can inflate this external and internal, uh, instability. yes conditionally saying, there, that the ship never sinks the water around when the water is inside, that is, the fifth column should work, and the second question, clarifying , nevertheless, the main threat comes from the southern border or from the western ones. the whole point is that i think they want to give us the impression that the main threat is from the south, but in fact, if some direction of the main strike is clearly shown, it is very likely that the impact can follow from unexpectedly from the most unexpected direction, therefore, i i think that the regional grouping will not be focused only on the southern borders to cover

southern edge. i think he will be ready to act on all fronts. we'll listen to other opinions. alexei what do you think, well, it's clear that we occupy, uh, a key position in the defense of both russia and the eastern bloc as a whole. i will say this, it is already being formed before our eyes, because one way or another, the geopolitical economic situation in eurasia in fact depends on our security on the state of our state , therefore china is also one of our main partners, therefore, in this case, again , if we are talking about the long game strategic interest of our enemy. this is destabilization. and in principle, the destruction of the belarusian state as a sovereign one, because what we see, er, in our neighbors, let's say in the baltics, is not a sovereign. the state is actually already semi-colonies, militarized with external control. therefore, in this case, this situation will last for 10-15 years, according to

analysts' forecasts. this new round of the cold war is even more dangerous than the previous one, because there are no rules for much more players. we see, how britain behaves, for example, not even always, following some instructions from washington, that is, they are playing their game of aggravating a daring, dangerous game for the whole world, therefore, in this case, our task is probably to think about increasing the armed forces that we should have a powerful army, especially as a counterbalance to what the poles are planning. we know their plans to bring the armed forces to 300,000 by the year 1930. well , naturally, mobilization should concern not only the military, not only the economy. we are from sanctions we are moving to such a regime, but the main mobilization of consciousness, our citizens must understand that in this period that we have entered, well, it will not be possible to sit out there, say my hut on the edge. this does not

mean that everyone should run there to study civil defense. although this does not hurt, by the way, the poles are active and improve their skills. some simply acquire new knowledge. how to use the machine, how to coordinate some elementary production. the main thing is to understand what kind of world we live in, and what are our long-term goals not just survive, but strengthen together with allies. and, of course, minimizing the threats and risks that have now arisen around our borders is another interesting point. we'll just continue. here sergey anatolyevich join us. it is interesting that last week the western press began to actively scare its readers with such messages. 9 minutes and they were not embarrassed that at the same time, for example, pentagon spokesman john kirby stated that the united states could not confirm the transfer of hypersonic missiles to belarus, what kind of game is this? the same. well, you know, of course, there are

a lot of throw-ins. yes, the information war. eh, deepening. e. i think that this is the question that we started with, this also applies , of course, to the same topic, e goes e, after all, attempts to draw the republic of belarus into, e, into the armed unit of this e russian ukrainian. uh, a conflict, uh, that we, of course , cannot allow, and the president constantly talks about it. uh, by the way, speaking, uh, regional grouping, it first of all strengthens from uh, it is our western direction that is connected. it's with what, uh. hmm, with deployment. the armed forces are already uh, in fact, nato is strengthening this flank. and, of course, we are talking about ukraine, well, there

are stuffing, of course, about what problems ukraine expects, almost the division of ukraine, who will enter ukraine, like dough. specifically this stuffing, of course. eh, more he touches. eh, the russian federation and the intensification of this e, psychosis and the expansion of the psychological war against the e russian radio of creating an image of such, well, is it a monster that the threat from belarus , maybe they already prepare their readers so morally that, if anything, to be we are ready that there is such a point, belarus, and we can also have our own military interests there. ah. well, you know, here you can guess and predict a lot. eh, talking about the south direction. i would like to emphasize that the president and commander-in-chief of the armed forces of the republic of belarus, as far as

i know. now e pays great attention to this particular topic, strengthening precisely the e of the southern direction. hey, why are they behaving like this? uh, the ukrainian side, but on the one hand. we can say that, of course, provocations will continue to draw us into this conflict, from the other side. it's mine. here is the impression that the ukrainian side is very seriously afraid. response of the republic of belarus if, so to speak, she crosses this red line, according to which the president has repeatedly spoken absolutely rightly, you really reminded of this the day before. here is the independence day and more than once the president said what would happen, if suddenly someone has thoughts about strikes against the republic of belarus let's remember. if only you dare to strike like they

are planning a chase in the south, help him an oil refinery, a plant at an airport airfield in luninets or brest, the answer will be instant instant just in one second than reply. we have alex please note many. by the way, they are talking about it now, because it is impossible not to notice. fugitives located in the baltic states in poland they have now actively begun to distribute interviews, in which the rhetoric has changed. they are no longer talking about possible strikes against belarus, but that these will be fair strikes by ukraine against belarus but this is why i’ll just share my point of view, it reminds me very much, you know, how it was there in yugoslavia at ninety the ninth year, when the serbian opposition appealed that we need to topple milosevic, so we need

help, and now you know such a trick, like the fact that the civil society of belarus is asking for nato fire, but i'm wrong or really. this is the game played by running. yes, you are absolutely right nato, in principle, always acts in a stereotyped way, yes, and all their algorithms are clearly worked out. they are now preparing their public for what is called a fair response. yes, we must remember that not only the rhetoric has changed, but they have changed their ideology and philosophy. they say that belarus is already occupied by russia. and since russia is a conditionally aggressor, it means that we have the right to free belarus from this aggression. yes, this rhetoric has already begun to change, about a month ago and actively, and now it is being introduced into western public opinion, but in terms of the first block that we talked about

strengthening. uh, uh, the ukrainian side of the border with belarus, uh, the actions that they they do, uh, minefields, yes, trenches, uh, this is actually not for an offensive operation, but for a defensive operation. why do they do it? we must remember the plans for that from 2006 of the seventh year yet, and then according to their plans, but earned. uh, the girth of belarus, uh, by two groups, so they are now making this defensive line specifically so that our troops and our groups cannot cut, this uh shock fist, which is now being formed by nato they are in reality, but nato is not they think on the scale of only one belarus, their main task is to cut it off, and russia from the black sea to cut off russia from the baltic. and

it is desirable to completely e.g. this piece that connects. uh, the baltic black sea, including i undertake to cut off and then russia completely loses its status . here are their strategic plans for us. now the main task is to start active information opposition to their western public and says that this is the aggressor. this is what they are trying. eh, change us. they are trying to start a new war, then it will be more difficult for him to manipulate the consciousness of their public. uh, but if we return to the statements made by the representatives of the fugitive positions, but one gets the feeling that now the moment has come when they perform the

tasks for which they are actually kept there, because, if you pay attention to these ones statements, then i hope that well, our viewers understand this for sure, but even those who once voted for these people do not understand very well that nato does not work pointwise. that is, if blows are thrown, they will not be delivered, and sambovich correct me if i'm wrong, somehow very carefully. this is the carpet bombing, as in yugoslavia, and they will not leave a stone unturned there, therefore, so that people do not have to know what to do. calls for these comrades. well, first of all, what are these carpet bombings for in order to to suppress the will to resist the workshop, in order to hit the psyche not of individual groups of the population, but of all nations so that it could not gather and socialize for resistance, therefore, of course, uh, here uh, the interest of individual groups of people, even those who once once were ideological allies will not be taken into account in the name of more important global goals. at the same time,

our colleagues recently announced the results of a closed study of glock, the gall institute. that is, if someone suddenly does not know or has forgotten, this american institute of public opinion. this information is a valuable replica for us, which shows that they are not our allies who conducted this sociological research. so they held such a closed one. well, apparently, the phones are a survey of 1,500 respondents and it turns out what kind of lukashenka and his actions, but they approve and, in principle, trust him. 70% of the polled belarusians, but the level of support for the opposition is less than a percentage. or maybe this is also one of the explanations why these people are now making such statements, maybe this is the only the opportunity for them now to bargain for at least some funds for their existence, sergey anatolyevich, can be assumed, of course, it is possible, but it seems to me that everything is also linked to the situation in ukraine, to these events, to those forecasts that are given on the development of the situation. and,

of course, they go to the usa. uh, electoral and elections are coming. and there, so to speak, voices appeared that they should go to ukraine for negotiations with the russian federation, so all this is tied into one topic. uh, i absolutely agree that this is about geopolitics about geopolitical interests. uh, but uh, specific current policy. it forces them to change certain tactics , which, uh, our opponents are doing, and including this runaway opposition so that it not only sleeps well there, eats well and travels around beautiful european capitals, which are no longer quite so beautiful after how they got the boomerang in response to the sanctions economic pressure, so everyone

works out, let's say. but let's continue anatolyevich with the same or as a person who worked in the united states of america and you from the inside, what is called understand how the forces are distributed there is really one of the main news of this week, probably, the next weeks among the people's news. these are the elections in the united states of america, the congress senate is now the governor's pool, and here is the most interesting point of distribution - these are the democrats -republicans in relation to ukraine, what you said and the most, probably, such a vivid remark that was quoted many times on those days. this is, of course, a member of the house of representatives of this the republican party, margin, and taylor gorin, who accused the democrats of only caring about ukrainian borders. let's hear what she said. democrats opened our border, but the only border they care about. this is ukraine, not the southern border of america under the republicans, ukraine will not

get a single cent. it won't get a cent, it's fixed. this was immediately fixed by the next democrats, because the rhetoric began to change. they immediately appeared when they saw that the republicans were rising on the anti-ukrainian agenda er, such stuffing appears, in particular, the washington post writes, citing some of its sources, that washington calls on kiev to show openness to negotiations with russia so that support for ukraine does not fall in the world on the eve of elections to another wall street building. e will publish a message that us presidential security adviser jake sullivan is holding confidential talks with russian presidential aide for international affairs yuri mushakov, security council secretary nikolai patrushev, the newspaper reports that the purpose of the negotiations. finding a way to disperse the conflict in ukraine, as well as a dialogue on the inadmissibility of the use of nuclear weapons. it’s interesting the day before the russian foreign ministry

said that russia is not conducting us negotiations on ukraine, and then what kind of game is this that takes place against the backdrop of the elections. uh, in congress, not only vintovich, how to read this correctly? yes , read er, right, of course. uh, it's probably not so simple, because everyone has their own goals, both geopolitical and political, uh, the united states of course is now divided into two parts and we are in your transmission. well, quite often returned to the topic. what is happening in this country. e. well, now here are the elections in all probability. ah, congress. e, it will become narrower, e, change color from blue to red. uh, color and it's even bigger. maybe deepen the split that now exists. and in this country, what i want to

say, and this is what experts say. they say that if the congress becomes absolutely republican, then, uh, biden will, well, i’ll say in simple terms, it won’t be good. that's what we are talking about , of course, about an attempt to impeach him. uh, if he himself does not leave this position. well, let's say for health reasons. it is not for nothing that they are also now more and more often saying that he is not capable of physically, psychologically and mentally managing such a country, but i would like to express the idea that, yes. now, as it were, this split is deepening, which can generally lead to very serious consequences in this state, in general, to the existence of this state on the other side. you know, long work. uh in the usa uh, i saw how they can do it in this the country, so to speak, uh change and uh, what

is the problem to use it for uh, let's say for development in order to well restore even those, uh, so the positions that were maybe during the discussion such a very tough uh, unflattering, but come true, therefore, of course, a very interesting situation that affects the geopolitics in general and the relations of the united states a with other countries. uh, of course, the ukrainian topic is at the epicenter now and uh, the republicans, of course, raised their rating, they are on this topic, uh, of course, are more likely to receive additional votes in congress. they win, uh, it is possible that there will be uh, significant uh, the renewal of the governor

's corps 36 governors are now being re-elected, so i promised that it would be interesting. well, as early as november, we’ll say something that needs to be resisted, so that the elections are again dishonest , dishonest counting of votes, that is, trump continues the line that he implemented a few years ago. e, he, as it were, does not calm down. this, let's say, is also not typical for the e, domestic political situation in the usa. well, in general it is very interesting what is happening in the united states, if you sketch about the elections like that, then the news is exemplary democratic elections. here is every word. you can put in quotes, this is a failure in the electronic voting machines. these are the missing ballots. on sites, people physically. they just can't vote and people come to the polling station to vote, and they have already voted for them, but only in the united states of america it may be that they don't get it. well, after that, trump really writes that in

spirit you will say protest protest protest. here, how are you, how will it end? uh, the situation in america is interesting because it is in one party in another. the radical wings, so to speak, take the upper hand. yes, we see that the democrats. as a matter of fact, this is the agenda that they are promoting. well, all these perversions are all this nonsense. yes hmm related to new values. yes, that is, this is, in fact, not the agenda of the classical democrats. and actually, hmm republicans. after all, also m-m trumpism is such a rather radical wing of the republican party, that is, the disappearance of the center, as such, the disappearance of consensus between, let's say, the middle groupings in both parties. this suggests that the crisis will not go away so easily, no matter who wins there, because none of the parties is ready to compromise, and they will advance their agenda and make

a trip, because they already have it there and there. well, such irreconcilable fighters. i don't know if it will end in some clashes. it's not for me to judge. this their business is internal. let them figure it out for themselves is another matter, that we, apparently, should not hope for any radical changes in american policy after all. i don't believe. here is a statement that they will not give a single cent, because if you have already invested 18-20 billion dollars there, it would be stupid not to withdraw this money in some way. and how to withdraw? well, again, trading in ukrainian sovereignty, trading in weapons, and trading in security. yes, one way or another, maybe marketing will change, so to speak, maybe the offer will change, but what money invested they will claim in any way and trying to solve this conflict at the expense of russia anyway, it is obvious, so i, frankly, would generally criticize the very american-

centric picture of the world. well, we are discussing the american elections so much, but it seems to me that the decision of the cp congress they are much more important for us for eurasia for stability for our relations. and here is what we discuss there for a long time and the nuance of american policy. we generally need american politics to exist in america and not in the global the world. here you need to do everything for this. to do this, you must first win, but it’s better to win in the mind to say that well, in principle, we don’t care who the british queen or who is the president of the united states we have our own pressing matters and it is more important for us, for example, a silk new road uh, you look organized by our states alexandrovich and here, what do you think, that's really it. here is the foreign policy of the united states, uh, will it really depend on who wins the democrats or the republicans? now more and more, by the way, including the americans themselves say that there is a distribution, this is the very deep state that, in the end, the democrats and

the republicans voted when there was this military doctrine where it was clearly defined that russia china iran is the main opponents. and does it depend on who will be the democrats or republicans in power? i would emphasize such a point here that it is believed that the democrats are the party of financial capital, the republicans of industrial capital. and that trump stands for bringing back america had power in industrial power so that the high-tech industries that flowed abroad, they were developed in the united states but, uh, the military-industrial complex is the most high-tech industry. the most advanced ones are investing colossal money, including work, and after all, money was not allocated to ukraine by and large or little money was allocated, the main money went to buy weapons from american companies that produce these

weapons. and they make up. yes they make up plans. uh, already for the next few years, almost for a five-year plan, the production of advanced weapons for ukraine. in addition, the training of specialist instructors for officers, this is also money for american citizens in many respects, and therefore. i think that there will be some nuances , small details. well, something in ukraine will not get something free of charge, as bender said, for every calorie mourned to you . i will require you a lot of small favors, so, of course, uh . that's why it's primarily in the interests of america in the interests of america that's why i think there won't be any special changes rhetoric.

it was built first. uh, in order to drown out the key. the economic problems that ordinary americans have in the united states of america in the first place, if you take here, uh, even uh, the latest cnn publication or broadcast there bbc they give the layout. what problems concern americans? more than 50% are concerned about socio-economic problems, inflation, unemployment, risk, loans, and so on, yes. hmm oh, crime. yes, ecology is crime, even at a lower level they don’t talk about ukraine at all, that is, the americans are worried about the problem of ukraine somewhere below 10%, but absolutely, and more than fifty- one fifty-two percent there. this is how they live . and why what situation develops the highest inflation. uh, if core inflation is now 6.6% in november, it was in october, and

the main rate is 8.2%, and it is growing, yes. moreover, the frs rate from e, actually zero, has been raised six times this year and is already at the level. uh, four percent left. and what does it say about the fact that those citizens who took out loans for mortgages on cars for education. they won't be able to pay out , not only that, uh, closing the bankruptcy of the largest companies in the united states of america itself and, uh, for the republicans and democrats. now we need to decide, that is, for the elite. how to calm down this population, but they don't know how to calm it down. they're trying to fight inflation by raising rates, but that will still lead to more and more people being stranded in bankruptcy. unemployment layoffs and so on from here try. that's how to switch attention to, uh, topics. e beats. uh, from the territory of

belarus is full. yes. well, yes, there are uh topics. uh, russian nuclear strikes allegedly against ukraine in order to emotionally switch them to another agenda with the global crisis, but they are the most important and the democrats are the republicans, and, most likely, they will lose the most in relation to their people. we , uh, understand very well that neither the republicans nor the democrats actually express the interests of the people as a party. they represent the interests of, uh, aristocracy and big business. yes, but there are no socialist parties, as such, uh, the united states of america. and the most important thing now is the task of the republicans and democrats to prevent the opportunity to come as a leftist or extreme leftist into it's a movement. and uh, crush

any protest movement with every opportunity. everyone says trump is calling for accountability. no, great-trump uh dick. uh, the same deep state uh club, uh, which is not interested in people protesting understand support for what you said very interesting research regarding , here we are talking deep state deep state there secret government, put whatever you want, separated by commas, but this theme, which is characteristic not only, let's say, of our narratives. yes, when we we examine foreign policy, but also to the americans in relation to their own state. here, uh, interesting data is given in the question of benzonance to meet the group means about the deep state of the real rulers. so according to this study, 44% of american voters believe that the us government is controlled by a secret cabal among the supporters of the republican party. more than half of 53% believe in it. and according to the same survey, fifty-nine percent, that is, practically 60% of us voters believe that their country

is moving towards a second civil war and you are already starting here. referring to the words of the same trump who said, i don't know if this country can last another 2 years. and if when he said it looked like a campaign figure of speech, now again, based on what you said, it looks like a very real threat to the united states of america, but we, of course, dedicate attention to this, because well, while it's still in in general, the largest state in the world, which intervenes in what is happening, including near us, completing the topic, closes the topic of the united states of america, we are waiting for november 15th. well, i'm just wondering what trump meant. although he announced already. he said that this is the year we return to the house of representatives we will return ourselves and the senate and we will return ourselves to america and in 2024, most importantly, trump said we will return ourselves to our beautiful white house. we continue our

program. in the first part, we talked about the united states of america is about the disappointment of the local population in both democrats and republicans who do not respond to their real needs, needs and expectations, and it is obvious that the united states does not have much time not only to deal with internal problems, but also to keep , but allies. look, spiegel writes with reference to a study by the center for monitoring analysis and strategy, the topic with the proportion of german citizens convinced of the need to carry russia out of the war in ukraine is steadily growing. i quote more detailed quote more understandable 40% of respondents in whole or in part, according to the statement that svo, on the territory of ukraine was the only possible reaction of russia to nato provocations if once again 40% of germans think so, here is for you what these

data say alexandrovich the impact of the crisis. and provoked by this war, it already reaches ordinary europeans, and in particular the germans, because for them these cut off energy economic ties with russia are a serious blow to the economy. they understand that this in what trap of germany as a whole europe fell. well , pay attention. i apologize that they are not even so much about the economy. here they specifically say that they point out the provocations of nato, that is, they see the injustice of the position that they have now taken back in the west. well, it’s obvious that, and when in german society they told what it means ukraine is defending itself there. well, here are the first months, yes, when there was a certain shock back in the west from the actions of russia, then now, after all, russian narratives still reached europeans, because they enough in russia they explain the reasons for

the action well, and so on, therefore, in this case. uh, i would say that and feeling. here, relatives are no longer just somewhere there is a war. but the economic effects of the arguments of russia and the actions of nato itself and the leadership of the military-political germany a. well, also. you are criticized. here we are looking. how many times the concerted action of the mead is acceptable, and which is headed by a representative of the green party schoolgirl who are trying to save the economy of the industrial party, let's say industrialists who, in general, want to preserve the industrial potential of germany and the actions of american shooters who are already ready to take. this is an industrial production to itself, supplying gas to the trider and so on. well , naturally, the british, who have always been prejudiced against germany for them. it was an eternal rival. that is, all this causes natural skepticism in people, criticism of the actions of their own

government, it is something in general e of the collective west. i know if this will lead to changes, because that we all understand. there may be 60%, then there will be those who understand the actions of russia and those who are dissatisfied. but this will not lead to electoral changes, because the system of control over elections, the exclusion of some really critical opinions, is set very high there. we see what happened to the dellinky left party. yes, she was defeated by charismatic leaders, in fact, they were ousted from politics such as sarah vaginas. oh, and the party has already turned, well, into such an ersatz of a truly left-wing socialist party, about which a colleague is talking about, because they are trying, and instead of really serious such revolutionary ones, one can say the forces to put forward to the first positions, whom tumberg says. she is our fighter capitalism. now now yes. it 's funny ecology. this means you need to analyze the present social protest to create such priests gopons. e in the form of this

girl, to essentially go further. continues the same policy you agree, well, i agree, only partly, the thing is that we must not forget that that germany is strong, as they say, genetic memory, although they are trying to forget, the results of the second world war, in turn, wipe the general, but they understand that if it is necessary to move further east, the threat of a russian retaliatory strike will also grow with the same e probability and they understand that it is impossible to compress this spring to the limit. putin says that we are standing still. it must be moving towards us. and in general, he marked these red lines long ago, and now he is starting a special military operation. he showed that his words are not words and russia is ready. in

the event of a threat to their vital interest, go to the most extreme to the very edge. i'm not talking about the use of all sorts of weapons of mass destruction there, but it seems to me that russia has enough resources that it has not yet shown to inflict, well, irreparable damage to the european continent, so i think this is a genetic memory and unwillingness to be pawns in this game, led by the americans. she forces the europeans. be very careful about this this issue. as it comes, uh, russian economic retaliation. they realize that uh, a military response could be much more devastating, especially since the economic factor didn't work to the extent, uh, that they expected. and you know in europe now there is such a thing. you know, this is not even a disappointment, we heard spiegel in this material. yes

, there is some kind of doom in the soviet fairy tale, what will, what is not will, and these days it is very good. serbian president vučić expressed this when said, we all understand who is behind the explosions of the northern streams. but we, i even quote , pretend to be fools and are silent. let's hear what he said. now we have a total of 667 million cubic meters of gas in four storage facilities, if tomorrow they block it or sabotage it, then we will pretend to be fools. although it is not known who organized the sabotage in the baltics, there is not a single politician in the world who would not know, but we all pretend to be fools and are silent so as not to harm the interests of our country. well, what can you do, this hypocrisy is everywhere, how they have sunk to this, how they have sunk. we are not pretending to be fools yet. you know, here, uh, the most important moment is probably this, both according to spiegel, and according to statements that the first, and

spiegel is in fact the newspaper that belongs to very strong capital , german capital, is financed by german capital and itself the fact that such opinion polls and the results of opinion polls were published speaks of the key one. uh, a very hard blow to the united states. america in the back. they speak, look, we assess this situation differently. so it does not matter. what kind of opinion polls did they really interview there or just, but they published the fact itself. uh, this is the beginning of a new information company, which, uh, began to promote. uh, the german capital is understandable that he is wildly afraid of losing his industry, his banks, his status as a u. e. red is conscious. uh, how britain or the united states of america wants to destroy them. yes hmm destroy through uh gas restrictions destroy

through inflation through expensive money and they understand that now uh they have uh, here. uh, rubicon either they go further they'll just be destroyed. yes, me and well they will just grovel. yes, they will go from billionaires to millionaires. and or they still conduct a sovereign company and are guided by russia, china, other alternative centers, financial and economic centers, and most likely. we are in the near even a few months. we will see even more striking statements from the side of not even germany, but there will be a statement in france and a statement in italy, and there may be opinion polls published. and this, of course, you. we because it will lead to the first, why the fact that nato starts to fall apart? come on, like like a structure that

tries to control. e europe, european countries and most importantly, e attempts to see a national policy e, and not eu policies focused on brussels, that is, direct contacts will begin. there germany with russia italy. with russia there, france with russia, this will lead to the destruction of this euro-atlantic unity. er, well, we'll be happy about that. it seems to me that after all, uh, europe is still under very tight control of the united states of america, even the situation in the united states, which will now continue to pretend to be fools and remain silent. yes, yes, yes, of course, in students, probably, uh, one of the few politicians who, well, tries to tell at least hints of some truth and, uh, to be, well, a decent politician, as far as it turns out. uh, well,

serbia has its own difficult situation, uh, but i want to remind you, uh, this is the macron's statement to the united states about the gas that is already on the market. that is, it was even the first one like this, well, sort of lung. uh, slap in the face to the united states, and regarding germany, i agree that under all under all, uh, circumstances. i'm sure that genetic memory, probably, should uh help germany to realize this situation and uh, most likely there will be political processes of leadership change in germany itself and this should lead. i am not a germanist, i do not pretend to express here, in fact. uh, a point of view and, uh, this is such a slight turn, which spiegel is now, uh, demonstrating to us either through spiegel demonstrates he appears to be going on. e. well, there are already e, and the opinion

of individual analysts and practitioners of diplomats that a certain level of psychosis here is somewhat subsiding and diplomacy is starting to return to e, so to speak, this platform and e, after all. uh, policy diplomatic settlement return to the negotiation process. this is the only possible way. uh, so that europe does not slide down, let's say, the abyss and the military of some such serious events. well, we ended up we, i mean, the whole world in between such a global choice, when, on the one hand, we see a proposal for globalization on mob projects, there is a global reboot. what is the right way to translate nulls, but this rank is transhumanism, which, in essence, what is transhumanism? this is the transformation of a person into a thing, a thing into a person, with completely ensuing

consequences, and on the other hand, we see the congress of the twentieth congress of the cpc where this task of the second century is essentially socialist, but this is the task of building a just state. we we see what polls show about this. the thirst for a just state exists in the united states of america in the european states. we have in china in india and so on. but how to build this just state. how to set aside your right, or pretend to be fools, again i quote, and votchicha and not be silent. where it is not necessary to be silent, but it is necessary to speak, the day before, in the palace of independence, they discussed the next stage of updating the legislation, which will correspond to the new constitution that adopted the belarusian people, how it will look and when put really efficient work here. an updated view of the entire belarusian people's assembly was talking about this yesterday about the president, here is one of the fragments. i propose to listen now, then we will discuss the new constitutions, we swung

at improving our system, without breaking it, in no case should there be any word, there should be no breaking , everything should grow, grow and be produced and appear from what is with the advent of a new body in the constitution in the national assembly, as i said, it is necessary to determine its place in the system legal acts. well, these documents are comparable in importance to the decisions of the congresses of the communist parties in their time. i also found that the law should contain answers to all questions on rulemaking, from procedures, preparation and ending with a clear statement of the rules. my requirement. everything should be spelled out in normal language, simply and clearly. we should by no means try on the norms that we are creating today; all these innovations should not be

tried on ourselves, how to implement this big task in practice, which concerns not only the legislator, not only the executive branch, but also the whole society to realize this concept of such. m-m directions of development. here is a stable predictable, and for the preservation of including the state in space in time. it's like you, seeing this great work, imagine that our state. moreover, it is based on such large social arrays. let's call them that and they will always remain. that is, no matter how society changes, the society there is an economy, but there will be certain social groups in the core of the state. yes, let's say, production workers, security forces, teachers , engineers. well, that is, without e, whom it is impossible to

secure any kind of life activity in the state. and of course, in order for these people to have representation in all government bodies in the parliament of the all-union people’s council, it is necessary that they really be present there and have the opportunity to have their representatives of these large social groups of arrays, as outposts of our state. of course, they also determined the strategy, because yes, there are professional politicians. it 's wonderful. they must be representatives executive power. yes, they are experienced people who know how the mechanism actually functions, but without the voice of the people without direct feedback from it, and constant feedback. it must be multi-level, yes, through the parliament through the elected deputies. yes, through representatives of the yes, through civil society, which should be present. well, in principle, everywhere, therefore, here is direct communication with the people, and feedback, so that even some critical signals, because it is

better to eliminate something in the initial phase than then say. yes, everything is fine. these are some, uh, buzovoy teras there from the peoples. yes, they are always dissatisfied with something. yes, there are those who need criticism for the sake of criticism, but still, so that there is feedback and the state can adjust its policy and check, first of all, with social support groups, which, well , pull our country into any difficult situation. wow, interesting, yes. well, i will say this, that it seems that the issues of state structure concern not only belarus, the world is changing, and it is becoming more and more aggressive unpredictable, and in general, the task is to ensure the ability of the state to survive in these conditions in the face of increased economic political ideological military pressure, so the question is how to arrange

the state so that it can withstand these threats. i think that, of course, these innovations that are now being introduced , they are recognized, first of all, to ensure the vital activity of our state in the future. we see that the soviet union, the core of which was communist party. it collapsed after the destruction of companies even earlier, then. e. the russian empire collapsed after the crisis of the monarchy, which was the core and now we need such a mechanism. which would have several centers of support so that it has under it. well, let's just say that a plate has the concept of a geological plate. here is our country. it is in such conditions that we are not afraid of an earthquake, because we have a powerful geological plate. that's what i think is the intention. uh, that's all the belarusian people's assembly is precisely to create this sustainable basis for our state on the prospects, so that no fluctuations of crises. that external

pressure, the internal structure could not destroy our state and stop its existence. uh-huh, thank you sergey anatolyevich well, it's clear what's going on in society now. uh, broad discussion. well, dialogue platforms were specially held to discuss these two bills, including changes to the electoral code. these are also important important documents. uh, but i want to emphasize that, uh, to the idea of, uh, fixing constitutional status. vns. we didn't come, you know how much we spent six days before the state and this experience showed that it is in demand , it is in demand by people. eh, especially the last one. uh, a meeting of the entire belarusian people's assembly. it

showed that it is possible to discuss here, on the one hand , and, uh, strategic issues, on the other hand. it 's uh, here. uh, this meeting is, uh, like this is the symbiosis of our society. what was also discussed here, therefore, it was necessary to fix it constitutionally. well, the president, of course. eh, how he is a very deep thinker, he worries about what will happen after uh, after us he says, so today we are in power. perhaps tomorrow we will, but the day after tomorrow they will come to manage. uh, other people are needed by the state, and this state is necessary, uh, which we created in such difficult conditions to preserve for our children and grandchildren to preserve

this stability. . eh, that's enough. hmm calmly. i will express myself so, but because here we have gained this experience and, uh, in my opinion, uh, a very clearly defined balance of the balance of power of interests, who uh? what structure. what does he do? what decisions does e make for what is he responsible for and emphasized the idea of ​​the president, which he said that in the national assembly a unique decision will be made and which will not, let’s say, not go against the odds with the decisions. there governments of parliament or others. uh, branches of government. why don't they like us? china doesn't like us. eh, first of all countries of the collective west because we offer an alternative model for the development of society. and when there is an alternative, then citizens

of the western countries, ordinary citizens, ordinary workers can look at the models and say, but we want to say like this , yes, therefore naturally for them, for those who lead the strange west, they are countries like belarus, like china is the biggest threat, because it is an ideological threat, yes, and the idea, once it has penetrated into the minds of the people, then it is very, uh, difficult to eradicate it in the first place, if we are talking about justice, because we see western society, it is already unfair , there is an oligarchy, there is, uh, an aristocracy, they rule their people as they want. uh, look what's going on in europe. uh, gas inflation. eh, let's, uh, it will be winter now. well, freeze a little, but we need to decide our interests in relation to russia. we don't have that. and therefore, when we

speak and the president speaks about the e development of the people of power, then we just create perfectly. uh, a new historical path of development for all mankind and show how to do it. but it is clear that we are taking the experience of the soviet union and the experience of, uh, and china, and this experience speaks for itself about one thing. e in the nss is an insurance against the fact that the aristocracy, or the ruling class there, gives the people at the right time in the same way as it happened in the soviet union when the ruling class, the party. uh, yes, the top gave its people. i just took it in the interests of the united states for some millions there. e, gave e the entire country. this should not be, therefore, but vneese uh, it was correctly said and the right idea, uh, all, uh, categories of our citizens will be represented there, and the most important thing will be

represented, including, uh, labor collectives, because we just visited gomel and, uh, bobruisk were at enterprises and interest. after all , kvn is just there from the side of ordinary workers yes , ordinary citizens. why because they see it as an opportunity for their participation? yes, your introduction of your ideas, your e, some experience. vanius, that they will be heard and the people will not be torn off from the administrative class. well thank you now it remains to translate all this into reality , work out clearly, in accordance with the law. well , to show the need and reason and an explosion of thought and initiative in order for all this to work for the benefit of the state and our people. eh, for today. anyway, thanks for being with us.

in the palace of independence today discussed the prospects of working with the chelyabinsk region record figures, symbolizing the prosperity of belarusian agricultural exports by the end of the year will exceed 8 billion dollars.