and, uh, the news was added that not only chancellor scholz claims so today, but also such thoughts were expressed in the commie key to the summit of this twenty, does this mean that not the whole world today is from ukraine, as eve in kiev and in the west, well, the question is interesting, let's analyze it. but before uh, let 's touch on the topic itself. still, i would like to say a few words about the information space. well, you must admit, 20-30 years ago. we are from the media space from the media facts received information, well, then some political interpretations of them were already going on, literally 10 years ago, the situation changed dramatically; the flow of information became so dense and diverse that information does not leave us for a second, moreover, the amount of information that passes . there is so much

more through us than we can grasp without well, through some sort of critical appraisal. and that means a lot of facts. we take it on faith. and this means that there is an opportunity not just for interpretations, but for the creation of an alternative a reality that absolutely does not correspond to what is happening in real life. it seems to me that all the talk about e-isolation or condemnation of russia is just the same story. uh, the point is that if you look closely, uh, at the voting and at the positions of the countries and at the statement and publications in the press of the national press, you can see that about 50 states are against russia. this is no more than 30. well, a maximum of 32% of gdp is all other countries that represent two-thirds of the population of the planet and and the main economic

potential of the planet, they are by and large either sympathetic to russia, or even supported by russia in this struggle. why because the collapse of the unjust unipolar world is certainly in their interests, another question is what they are doing? sometimes it's passive because they understand what direct open support is. uh, and they can become the object of aggression, the west, so they don't oppose , they just abstain. yes, they try to give, uh, passive support, but in doing so, let's look at the real action. uh, in fact, the entire sanctions policy against russia has failed. and all the talk about the energy blockade, the refusal to buy russian gas or oil, all this talk was absolutely shitty. and i think that it would be more correct to say that 2/3 e of the planet is more likely to be

on the russian side or rather than on the side of the countries of the collective smell. this g20 summit reaffirmed china's clear and unambiguous position, uh, on the main aspects on the international agenda, and a position that is entirely consonant with our vision of international relations and, uh, this vision has been voiced by our president more than once. here, in your opinion, what does such a commonality mean from the position of belarus and china on in modern conditions, well, the situation. with china in general it is very interesting. look, china, in fact, has been becoming a global factory for the whole world for several decades. now almost all goods, uh, that are sold both in the united states of america and in western europe are are produced mainly in china and household appliances and machinery and machine tools and equipment and construction is developing very rapidly in china china has built a long-term strategy, and by

using, in fact, the lower wages of chinese workers, but over time it gained economic military political power. he acted in accordance with the rules of the global system. but when he lied, it's strength, he said, dear, i'm now in a different weight category. please move over. we we act in accordance with the rule that you came up with, but the west does not like this. that's it. the ability to act according to the rules to respect uh, the rules is just in my opinion, unites us in china and china and the republic of belarus we always declare our foreign policy as a policy based on the universally recognized principles of international law. here we have a lot in common, but another problem. and in us, again, and in

china, this is that the west is in no hurry, uh, to fulfill what it once wrote. uh, you know there is expression a gentleman only obeys the rules when he wins. and if he stops winning. he changes the rules. now this is happening, and in relation to china, the west has set a course for the destruction of the chinese economy. the west has taken a course of interfering in china's internal affairs, using, among other things, a factor. this is also not accepted by china and belarus does not accept interference in the affairs of a sovereign state, therefore, it seems to me that we have much more in common than it might seem, and the second point is an excellent basis for development indeed mutually respectful and mutually beneficial cooperation in the future. i would probably characterize it in this way, russian

foreign minister sergey lavrov said that the european union has long been involved in a hybrid war in ukraine, let's listen to his statement recently. there is a war in ukraine a hybrid war that the west unleashed and which it has been preparing for many years, starting from the moment when it supported the rise to power as a result of a coup d'état of openly racist neo-nazi forces since then, nato has been actively mastering the territory of ukraine, conducting exercises, putting down weapons. well, you know, when events developed further, including the sabotage of the minsk agreements and including the start of preparations for a military operation against the donbass well, the nato secretary general echoes him, he said that the alliance as a whole has already trained tens of thousands of ukrainian servicemen, the question is obvious, who is the aggressor hmm well, me it seems we could look

at the situation even more broadly. e context. uh, the point is that at the present time, in general, the entire global economy. she approached uh, very difficult stage of development. here is the socio-economic formation. e, which is built on private ownership of borrowed capital in the market. she had reached her limits . she cannot develop further. uh, a major reformatting of the world is coming. eh, this is the world. these kinds of crises are called phase crises. this, when there is a change in the mode of production, is a difficult topic, uh, i will not go too deep into it, but as a rule. uh, in such a phase crisis, it is accompanied by, uh, serious destruction of economic well-being to destroy and again restore. well, by and large. yes, but already on a new basis and the first. by the way, who understands? these

were western western elites, we call them differently financially, corporate circles. uh, the financial corporate elite, representatives of the multinational corporation. but to put it simply, it's just western oligarchs. they are fused with power and power by and large. in these countries acts in their interests. so these western oligarchies have decided that they need to again pour those resources that russia into managed to a certain extent over the past few decades. i'll be back. here after that wild privatization. e yeltsin period by and large , a lot. e. russia's classic natural resources are back, er, back. e into state property is national property, and now there is again the opportunity to get them back. therefore,

this conflict is a conflict, uh, which can be characterized as follows in ukraine a national state. russia is at war, by and large , with a group of transnational oligarchs of the west who advocate a new such globalization on new principles, which they called inclusive capitalism. which is never inclusive non- capitalism, if you don't go into it deeply, then this is, in principle, the logic of this idea, it is very interesting. they say let's give up the nation -state. they are huge. they are such complex leviathans. uh, bureaucratic we have multinational corporations that will run the world. this is a social responsibility corporation. eh, and, in principle, we will have everything ok. what's the catch? how do you think? but the catch, probably, is that these states, which they

are destroying, will develop. they will no longer develop, they will profit. yes destruction is correct. that's a very true assessment, the thing is that a corporation is a tool for making a profit for owners. this is not a state. this is not a state. they will not engage in social development. they will not strengthen the human potential only what is needed for their production to obtain profitability in general approach. yes yes, classical variant consent has been reported. yes, she had colonies that she did not develop and there should only be arab labor for a penny, because the slaves had to exclusively extract resources and supply them with this logic of inclusive capitalism, but the only thing he said was the organizer, yes, of the economic forum . he said to move to this system, which in general in reality can be called feudalism. uh, in order to move to this system, we need all the countries of the major countries to agree, uh, with this model and

there were two countries that said no, very harshly, directly refused, russia, well, and the east gave an answer. china, this happened about a year and a half ago, and what we see six months ago, russia is embroiled in an armed conflict, but a war. uh, our political scientist is a guest. andrey sec. recently suggested that the war is still from china, you will agree. let's not talk for now. about china i want to tell you about another very interesting aspect of this conflict. this is not a war between russia and ukraine this is a war of these oligarchs, uh, who are used by drugged ukrainian parts of the ukrainian population, like cannon fodder for the destruction of russia, and the most, probably, the biggest mistake that they made is that they translated this conflict. this conflict is the category of ontological confrontation ontologically - this is a term that says that the

conflict has no possibility reconciliation is impossible. so there are two parties to the conflict. someone alone must necessarily be destroyed, but such are the anthological tests. russia throughout its history has gone through at least four times and every time it came out victorious russia can lose the war, but it cannot lose the anthological conflict, as a result of which it will not be, well, examples can be given this and uh, the steppe invasion is a variant of the steppe war uh in the tenth century. this is the invasion of napoleon. this is the invasion of the commonwealth at the beginning of the 17th century, and this is the most terrible test - this is the second world war. and you tell me, but the smell has ever been successful in such ontological conflicts, i don’t remember. i can say one thing, here is an example of e

such a conflict in the west, this is the war of rome and carthage must be destroyed. this is a classic version of the same kind, the ontological conflict is a civil war. uh, the united states of america north and south, when north and south, but that was a long time ago, but it's not allowed. it seems to me so far. it arose again, let's say, so it arose again as a result of certain cycles. and what we have is that, it seems to me, it was a strategic mistake. west we can expect the collapse of the global economy rather than, uh russia's military loss in this conflict is more likely to happen the other way around. if china joins, i want everything. include this game in our chess game. where is china located? yes, to be honest, it is also located. uh, let's say in the ranks of supporters of a multipolar world. this is the device that was proposed as an alternative. here is this

new neo-globalization of this inclusive capitalism, according to the logic of things. in the same row, there are other major leading states and india and brazil and indonesia are very many. at in general, two-thirds of the world. we have already talked about this. uh, another question that seems to me that the western oligarchs. i will already use this term. they realized that they had to walk this path towards inclusive capitalism. it just won't work. it seems to me that they have already set a course for the collapse of the whole world. they understand that there must be a reboot, when there is a logic of conflict, it arises. the question is how much can you save for yourself? now they are thinking in this way how many material resources, what territories, they can control after the collapse of the world? well, the second goal is to apply. as much damage as possible to everyone

else so that they cannot recover from this conflict so quickly. i think we are now in such a historical period, the collapse of the whole world. how is it possible that this is a nuclear war. i think that this will be connected primarily with the collapse of the global economy and there will be a redistribution. that is, relatively speaking, there will be no more phones produced in china for the whole world. yes, and it will be in every macro-region in every group of states that will merge into its own markets will be produced a complete set. e key strategic products of goods services, and between each other, macro-regions will mainly trade either in raw materials. either, uh, food or only those goods that they cannot reproduce at home, that is, the world will change very seriously in this regard. do you believe in the success of these oligarchs that they will be able to immediately bring down. i think

to a certain extent they will fail. do not bring down why. because they created this global financial system that has come to limit of development. that is, it collapses. in any case, regardless of their desires, the question of when is the date is always a weak point of such predictions, because it is necessary to calculate all the factors that affect the speed of the process. well, probably no one can now, but in any case, i appreciate, uh, the opinion of various economists and political scientists and experts. uh, they say, practically everything is already for years, not a decade. and what will replace it? this one will come , these ones. no, no. no, they can't do it. best case scenario. they will be able to use this model in one of the centers. it will appear in one of the macro-regions. well, relatively

speaking, five or six macro-regions of such large associations of states with their own markets with their own division of labor that will compete with each other and this will enable development for another 20-30 years. forward. turkey did not accept the condolences of the us embassy in connection with the recent tektor in istanbul, the head of the turkish ministry of internal affairs criticized the condolences of the us diplomatic mission used an interesting comparison is that it can be distinguished as if the kill was one of the first to come to the scene of the attack. in addition, information appeared that the woman who committed this attack was also preparing american tools. and right after this terrorist attack, a couple of days later, the following happened, yes. who's signal? who do you know, i would still like to take the opportunity here to express condolences to both the turkish leadership and the turkish people, after all, this is the country in which i

worked as an ambassador, and it is very close to me cute and turks turkish people and the turkish state it is important that this country is actively working and actively protecting its own national interests. yes, they may have some regional ambitions, but they really do everything to increase both the weight of turkey and the well-being of turkish citizens. and this policy sometimes collides and begins to conflict with interests. again, these notorious western oligarchs, they are given to understand that they should not do this. first, through the interstate diplomatic channel, but if the state does not calm down. this kind of terrorist attacks and the statement of the turkish leadership by the turkish minister of foreign affairs are in the business, and must be taken with all seriousness. they have reason to say this is the next stage of the confrontation. if turkey

continues uh, these actions are likely that some kind of color revolution will be staged against them. let's remember in the sixteenth year in turkey they already tried to organize a military coup. by the way, the russian special services gave information. about the upcoming coup uh, erdogan directly life, in my opinion, someone very yes, yes by and large . that's exactly it. uh, radical turkish radicals organized this assassination attempt, which unfortunately passed. well, tragically, let's move on to the next step. and now, you see, this is what it all says, about the fact that these over the national oligarchic structures are only interested in them. their profit is only their benefit. they are ready to sacrifice any state, even allies. but turkey is still a member of nato and an ally. u

of the western bloc, this is a serious signal. come on and let's not forget everyone used to talk about that the west is allegedly fighting terrorism. but there is such an organization, the muslim brotherhood. they are present in almost all e countries of the middle east, the transitional government after the color revolutions are as follows. you know that historically they were created somewhere in the late fifties by the british intelligence services from those times. they are on the provision of western intelligence services today about this already. we are not even us, maybe we didn’t know, but now it’s not difficult to guess, when you analyze the events that occur, this is the logic of actions, but this western lobby, which is the head of the eye, putting their own interests and are willing to sacrifice. uh, no matter how many ordinary people, we are not aware of how cynically and harshly this policy is sometimes implemented, but we must

understand this. i hope that sooner or later this understanding will become universal. in the meantime, we will try to realize this, accept and understand, we will break for a while, i remind you, we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe ask questions and suggest guests we are in touch. for those, who wants to keep abreast of new developments. with the development of science. many problems are left behind, however, our researchers do not stop their work, but in the modern world. but it’s like it’s already about 40 and you sometimes forget what happened yesterday, maybe this is the same thing and you need to see a doctor. i ask how alzheimer's disease specialists have - it is always accompanied by dementia manifestations. yes, that is the same dementia today microbiological preparations. this is very relevant. it is fashionable at all not environmentally friendly,

pure or quality products. this is a guarantee of the health of our population, everyone is trying to paint for themselves this picture of such a positive old age. and when im asked a question. so what should be done here, everyone thought, watch the popular science project science mania on belarus 24 tv channel. he knew that his experiments were life -threatening, but continued them despite the warnings of reputable scientists, your eyes , the young scientist made a sensational discovery. how many years of centuries? scientists went to this, not knowing what will be the result. and this is just one example. such liquid gases, he was able to refute the theory of the world's luminaries of science about the impossibility of obtaining oxygen in liquid form oxygen, which will turn it

into a liquid. it's impossible. watch the documentary zygmund in rublevsky hot oxygen on saturday on belarus 24 tv channel. why the same events and circumstances are treated differently, who creates new ethics and new information trends, and who benefits from this for someone it didn’t sound, but there is documentary confirmation of this, these plans for many years were nurtured secretly and were not voiced aloud. and these are proven facts. or this other ksenia lebedi will tell you in detail about the phenomenon of double standards. and how they work in the project. this is different, do not miss it on belarus 24 tv channel.

on the air say again, do not be silent. and today our guest is andrey savinykh, andrey vladimirovich, a member of the house of representatives, where the un assembly recently adopted a draft resolution on compensation for damage to kiev well, in other words, reparations from russia on which ukraine insists belarus was categorically against. and here is how the post before our country at the un valentina rybakov reacted. let's listen from the point of view of international law. this is just an attempt to legalize the theft of other people's assets. this is also a very good example for all of us. for all those who still believe that private property in the west is sacred. the project does not mention the crimes committed by the colonial powers

over the centuries, the consequences of slavery , the destruction of entire peoples who lived on in the occupied territories, no one has ever paid and will not pay reparations to countries and peoples for the damage, which, by the way , probably cannot be assessed and for all the suffering that these countries and peoples endured, dmitry medvedev also spoke about this i will quote from golosaksa, they are clearly trying to scrape together a legal basis for theft, illegally arrested russian assets. let them adopt the same recommendation that the united states fully compensate korea for damages to vietnam and rakov, yugoslavia and numerous other affected by the americans and nato otherwise. this is like the beginning of the agony of the un as the main international institution for reconciliation; the end will be painful for the entire international society . and without such an organization of the united

nations in quotation marks andrey vladimirovich well, maybe , indeed, he already lived himself as an international organization promoting reconciliation, which can replace a short remarque if you are already seriously developing an understanding of the ukrainian conflict, then logically things, uh starting point - this is the coup d'etat in kiev in the fourteenth year, which was carried out under e, with the complicity and support of western countries , it turns out that they must compensate for all the costs and losses that occurred in today's ukraine another question is that legal there are no legal grounds for this, of course, and in this regard, i completely, uh, agree with valentin uh fisherman. as for the un well, let's not forget that it was created in the middle of the last century after the end of world war ii, as e an instrument of international cooperation in

the conditions of the two polar worlds, two superpowers, the usa, the ussr, and this instrument worked very effectively. and he created a huge number of useful programs and, in general, he achieved the necessary and valuable results. uh, the situation went into disarray, uh, after the ninety-first year after the collapse of the soviet union, when, in fact, a unipolar world appeared. since that time, the un system has gone into crisis and is losing its influence. uh, in the first place, the countries are to blame, the donor, and so called and the global hegemon, which began to simply grind this system, destroying it. uh, that's the neutral uh, the nature of international projects and interactions within this organization. and i think it's not about the un. why. because the charter that was written, uh,

was then in the middle of the 20th century. this is a unique document. this is truly an achievement of mankind. and we need to save it, and the second question is what? well, even if we suddenly exchange it like a gunation, you still need it later will recreate some kind of multilateral format. i think the more reasonable scenario here is that we're going through a period of conflict. and now, if you use the old testament sayings, from there now is the time to scatter stones, and not the time to collect them, but the time to collect stones, when before the shelter, when it will be necessary to develop new rules for the hostel, when there will already be a clear understanding of the alignment of forces in this new world. after this phase crisis. so , then, uh, the leading countries will have to get together and implement the president's initiative

alexander says to belarus that lukashenka, who said get together and develop new rules of the game, is the initiative that we have called helsinki 2, yes, and we will live by them. i think that after that we will succeed. compare it to its former greatness. i think that it is not necessary to scatter stones too much, it is necessary to preserve this once magnificent instrument, which is now experiencing a crisis . and above all because of the states. let's not forget that he is member states, and when there is no peace and harmony between them. here it will always be in crisis, everything is unbalanced and everyone began to measure their strength. who has the right to what, and, as i said, western gentlemen have decided to cancel almost all the rules that have been in force in the global world so far this time of uncertainty. this is

a time of conflict. and such a time always exposes the real essence of things, the real content of things. and it becomes obvious to everyone. well , we’ll probably also touch on ukraine, the hungarian deputy congratulated poland on a recent day. dependency and wished her again to have a common border with hungary. and he accompanied it. uh, this is a congratulation of such a photograph, and on it a hungarian and a pole shake hands after the capture of carpatho- ukraine by hungary in 1939. one would like to ask if irresponsible behavior will divide ukraine among themselves. i want to recall here also a historical fact, the thing is that after the forty- fifth year there was one unshakable principle that all this respected the inviolability of post-war borders. in europe, in fact, this principle has become the key to peaceful coexistence. for

more than 75 years now, the tough political decision that was reached in yalta by the three leaders of the visionary state, in principle, it worked, but this principle was destroyed. how do you know when when? well, when the things of the ussr were divided no , no, no, not even, this is when yugoslavia really began to be divided. hmm he was already staggering then. well, he was finally buried by the americans when they recognized kosovo. and since then almost all talk about revising the borders of europe e not only does not subside, but, on the contrary, intensifies, this is extremely dangerous. why because uh, the question is not only about galicia, which was once part of poland ;

romania, where there are evidence of a compact residence of the ethnic hungarian population of gdansk and its belonging to germany, even scholz has already raised, hinting at the poles, the process begins, it turns out the revision of borders, er in europe and beyond any doubt. uh, this is a very dangerous path, but take the middle east, where are the borders of states. uh are drawn on the territory of the former possession of the colony, france and great britain. that is, there are even more reasons for local conflicts. it's just a reason. this is a policy of such revanchism, i share it and rule. yes, this is the kind of conflict. they are just, well, brushwood for kindling the fires of war by and large and very often the cause of real confrontation, as

soon as some state weakens. if there are such conflicts, then their neighbors. immediately they begin to make claims to the territory of this state. i think that this situation should be considered in this vein, this is a dangerous path and a path that we cannot ignore. and i think that in this regard, the position of belarus is the most thoughtful and logical. we not only have a well-trained army, but also as part of our defense initiatives with the russian federation an attack on belarus would mean an attack on the union state, and this, in principle, excludes the possibility of such a local conflict along our borders. in any case, it sharply reduces this probability. uh, recently aleksey aristovich told where he gets the information that he transmits to smith of his brother information and housing

you have access to a short head of access. i'm in the states. how do you assess the level of preparation of this adviser, who takes information from his head. well , let's get it right here. we need to be very clear. this situation. this is not a journalist. this is not a source of information. he is a psychological fighter. he is essentially an information saboteur who works. e to create a distorted public opinion. that is the question of truth. no, here, if we consider him as saboteurs who is very prepared. running, he is well versed in neuro-linguistic programming techniques, uh in his behavior. one can even see a certain element of erection use of ericksonian hypnosis techniques. here i emphasize again truth or some