here is one in absentia, but it’s another thing when you come to feel and you understand that it’s really with love. in the heart, they’ll say, yes, it makes me very happy, because you say that many russian officials prefer belarus to come here. uh, soviet belorussia yes, and the truth is already hurting the ears a little, and we perceive it somewhat. well, it's not clear, yes. why do you have such a definition? well, let's say. our country is very positive, i will take it so. oh, you know, i was actually born, born in uzbekistan that is, i have, uh, a very difficult fate for my relatives, uh from my father's side and siberia from my mother's side. uh, i have it in voronezh, because it was also during the war in evacuation , and my grandfather and father dispossessed us. i mean his family at the time. and as you know,

paradoxically, kulakov were usually exiled in siberia. but then it turned out that they had to flee to central asia. and now this time is such a war after the war, and there is already a post-war time. eh, i gave birth with and. eh, you know, right there then you know with people from all over the soviet union came. i remember ours, i was in school. out of 30-something people in our class, there were at least twenty people of 27 nationalities, different different different very diverse, including the volga germans . well, everyone and belarusians, there were ukrainians and uzbeks. naturally, there were no tatars either, there was just no one, yes, and this is the environment in which we grew up, first of all, respect. you are respect and a desire to understand, we went to visit each other, treated us to our national dishes there, that is, interest respect for another culture other traditions careful

attitude. you understand you can not invade the national environment like that. uh, you know, with a heavy boot, but you can’t, because sometimes, when you do n’t understand, it seems to you that it’s normal to drop this phrase, but people, especially i know it, because i worked a lot in the caucasus but this is what i had in my childhood there are such nuances that you think, something is nothing special. and you can offend not just a person. and you can offend people, so you have to be. that's what i have since childhood. this delicacy subtlety respect and desire to understand yes, well, well, what can i say? eh, you understand? we all still have blood hanging. yes, that's in each of us and the ukrainian belarusians. and the belarusian and this feeling of our slavic have a water mentality and a common history of our country, the soviet union we don't care, well, i uh, excuse me,

next year will be 70 years old. yes, that is, but we grew up, you can’t reject it , you understand, and there was a lot of good, and this is inherent in us, and er. here, apparently all this, well, formed my character and attitude is and so for me. well, here, i say, absentee love and intimacy, but now she is here, i just felt her. thank you. well, uh, look at the chairmen of the cec of belarus and russia, uga karpenko and panfilov, a communist. well, that's how i figured it out for myself. yes, how do you succeed and did you manage to find a consensus, there are no problems at all, and i will say. why. first, we are both in this case as heads of electoral systems. what is an electoral system in general? she already

determines what it is a democratic way of forming power through elections, and uh, i will say that all these stereotypes have outlived their usefulness, everything that was formed by the communists was chosen. democrats, conservatives, republicans. now everything has collapsed. right now, in recent years, especially when a compressed time is growing, dynamism is growing, that is, such in general, that is, we are entering a new historical era in general. and this ideological epoch is generally a way. i would say that this is now a challenge for all of humanity. to be or not to be? in what coordinate system, how are we? will we be able to get out of the impasse into which the west has driven us with its own? yes will we be able to find ways to coexist with wildlife, sit down, peacefully, harmoniously, how will we build at all?

what quality of life should be the quality of interaction with everyone. uh, well, let's say this with all the representatives. here is the creation of this being. these are the most important philosophical questions. yes, and in this case, we all will have to answer this, and but all these stereotypes are political cliches, they are all collapsed, what is modern communism, a communist arose , take and today we were in the temple, yes, and uh, no matter how we say. uh, well, the soviet era. you should be an atheist, and so on and so forth now, but this is not the case, many are communists, they are believers or they perceive it very much. peaceful refers to religions, then i, for myself, i can’t understand this definition of a democrat, and in general, communism is a democrat of communism - this is an ideology. in my opinion, and democracy is a way of forming power to a greater extent, a procedure, and

not some gem ideology. well, what, here i am, in general, since the ninetieth year, non-partisan. here i am, despite all the myths did not set foot, i came to the communist party with the advent of gorbachev in 85 with faith on the variable. let’s say with nadezhda how quickly it left this party in the nineties with great disappointment and already distrust, because it began to do in the ninth to a year before the path was made and how the path and when everyone ran from there in a year until then ever since. i did not join any party and my worldview. here i would so said representation it is much more complicated than those, than those political clichés. yes, i am a very free person with- internal freedom, so i am even free of others. and yes, i think, well, let

's say something. i am very tolerant and liberal, but on the other hand i am a deeply patriotic and believe that right now in my mind. even if we take our country, and how this is a dramatic situation that has developed, how society has shown it. everyone now manifests itself in a new quality, and now these all of them have collapsed all these lags. we are now for the country or you for destroying it, not just against it, but on someone's side. that is why we have all of our most important political forces. don't look everyone you know turned out to be so mature. and then there was an understanding that all our ideological contradictions are different. now they are secondary. come on, if we join forces now. let's save the country. and then, on the path of its development, when yes, we

will decide these nuances, so no, i don’t see any contradictions, we have a lot in common. and now we discussed today and just the main task, without imposing anything on each other. we appreciate the specifics of the national specifics of the system, each with its own electrothermal cultural, while sharing experience. we will share experience and develop what, for example, is acceptable from us, you are acceptable from you . what kind of development do we have here? well , since you have touched, yes, the topic of democracy and liberalism. you have served as commissioner for human rights. uh, from the fourteenth to the sixteenth year, and led. uh, movement citizenship were. at least what i read yes were in the democratic opposition. and in general, here's the word since we have already touched on this democracy and human rights. yes, at a certain moment, you must agree , they were for the soviet people, especially

such a magical light. this is how it is, this is the faith into which the new faith, which they tried to impose on us, but over the past couple of years, they have discredited themselves so much that i don’t know, frankly speaking, how to relate to them and isn’t it time, in principle, not introduce new distinctions. that's why vaunted western democracy does not evolve, but degrades and how true. this is the saying that democracy is dead. but for now, the people will live, and the desire for the people to form a state, a society, a country. well, that is, the very concept of beggars, it’s just necessary, but in the old sense it collapsed, because if and how about those countries that have appointed themselves light than winter dyes, that is, this is actually advanced. you look there everything happened. there they turned into

democratic werewolves. i would say why foundations of democracy. it is, of course, the power of the people. maybe a straight gun to be. there , i will not list a whole series, but the main signs, but i will say one thing. ah, that is, it forms this majority rule, but the rights of minorities are respected. yes, let's say this is the classical understanding of democracy. and what happened in the west now is the dictatorship of the minority and they shut up this majority, or there is an imitation with it, no one considers what kind of democracy it is. this is a perversion. you understand this perversion. uh, so what speak? and i actually say. i always thought that there was more of a soviet person in me, yes, or that's when the union collapsed yes and a. we

wanted change, we wanted something new. and so i remember myself. well, she was pretty young. we were, you know, not only me, and i think, lord, well, what a fool i was sometimes. yes, why, because we were both naive and gullible, we really hoped that the west would be friends with us. what kind of preparation to help us? that is, we believed all the hypocrisy that fell upon us for the first time when i was appointed minister of social protection. that is the most difficult time. uh, late 1991. it was just here on january 15 november uh-huh actually. today we have 17 today. 91 so that's 31 years ago, huh? and when my classmates, who i am an electronics engineer, came to me in horror, yes, they graduated from them and, uh,

my guys, all the co-student students worked in it in boxes in others, everyone began to close everything began to collapse. all were yesterday. they were democrats. everyone wanted change, and today they were left without anything without understanding that, and now in this horror and chaos, but became when i saw how to tell you. the new owners are those who felt like new owners, the international monetary fund, the world bank, which opened the offices of high officials with their feet. i remember that they came to me as a minister and began to offer there, well, in fact, if these are the recommendations, then this means, in fact, i divided by 10, what they said and understood that, in fact, we are on the extinction to close, and there are not only mines, but rather high. i would say high production. well, even tv they made military industrialists so that we riveted

pots highly qualified working class personnel were taken away, degraded and dumped from europe from there dirty primitive technologies, leaving only this high intellectual it. yes, that's it, it's already, to be honest, i kicked out of the office and said that i, uh, i uh don't come anymore. it's impossible, but you said, i was in a democratic position. after all, for the first time i expressed in russia and left the government. this is precisely from the democratic government, when i saw that the tilt is like this, that is, the reform in the economy does not correspond to the victims, in fact, due to the greatest social human losses, this can happen, then there is no balance, and because they did not hear me. i left the government. that is

, at that time i was in opposition, just in the democratic government it became yes and to yeltsin and, well, then, so you know, that is, i was in different positions. i was their putin in opposition at one time. yes, we are with him for the first time the first woman who walked. yes, as a candidate presidents, just when he was elected for the first time, yes, yes, therefore, uh, well, i have my own understanding of justice, such a luxurious biography, because here it will even go a little deeper. yes, look, you were still a people's deputy in the soviet union yes, the people were a deputy yes, 89 years old. minister in black when he was a state duma deputy under yelets but look, this would then be, perhaps i was a minister at the same time. i was a minister there for only 2.5 years, and at that

time, yes, just like the minister was elected in kaluga and a deputy. that is, in two capacities i have long been commissioners for human rights. yes, just recently, you know, after i left. uh, vot resigned from the government. that is, it was a voluntary departure, that is, a resignation. i have not been an official for a long time. it's hard for me to be an official. i'm a very free person, it's hard for me. i can't just obey. i need to be convinced that if i here i agree, i believe in what they tell me i should do it, so for a long time i was supposed to be. well, it's worked out. consciously thought. i must believe in it. i left and i was there for a long time. well, as a free police, it is true, i headed the councils under yeltsin on a voluntary basis . social on some issues, that is, there was an alternative, and then, after the presidential elections, when vladimir vladimirovich invited me. well, it was all on a voluntary basis

and for the first time. after such a long break, that is, consider this the beginning of the ninety-fourth year, when i left in the fourteenth year, that's two. how long has it been? yes, just 20 years later. i am returned to the state structure. yes , an institution, since there was a unanimous proposal from both sides for me, both from human rights activists and from the president, to head this institution. it was for me a historical event art of the fourteenth year. in the morning he invites me to the state duma and they approve me there. in what authorized human rights, after lunch, i go to the kremlin for a historic event, when the agreement on the crimea was signed and my first trip was to the crimea because. well, uh, so many questions at once it arose that i had to do this right away from the spot in my career. well, look,

you ran for president in 2000. yes , since we have already touched on this topic, but let's say, so everyone would, but such hopelessness, well, after all, ah. i don't want to involve you in female change, do i? well , please, but i would like to draw an analogy. surely you followed the elections in belarus in 2020 . and now it’s clear to me personally, as a person with such experience, well, we have listed yes , only some of the positions in which you were and how a person with such experience and knowledge can apply for the position of president well , the presidency, but here's how our e fairy allowed me to go to the polls with such a store of knowledge as she has, i can't understand this, well, you see, two categorically different situations and candidates. here. alexandra, what do you think about it? i don’t want to impose my opinion, and yet it’s not about

genes. you know, it’s very difficult for me to impose some kind of opinion, so i educate you, you know, we didn’t talk about one very important consequences in which, but i was starting i was starting a master at production when all my classmates asked with her. i said no. i want to work in production, and she worked at the factory for 12 years and started as a foreman. uh, you know me, they taught us at the institute, thank god not only soldering, but also welding there, uh, you understand, i worked not only with my head, but with my hands. yes, that is, i also had a workshop from everyone and at first 120 men very much i will tell me girls there, uh, a little more than 20 years. yes, it was not just that you respected somewhere. at first, i ran the construction for them in six months. here is the character. you yourself passed, do you know from the ground? you know what heavy production is, dangerous production, you are in the midst of people,

you do not come off the ground. you pass, you gain quality gradually, this experience, a person understands, it doesn’t matter what gender you are, a woman, a man, well, thank god we have two sexes. we do not believe in any of the 99 transgender people and will never have this without a doubt. even the quality of the personality is important. what do you have in your soul, what can you offer people, and what can you convince them of, and you can see people in something, if you yourself lived it, felt it , realized it and thought it through, yes, then people can believe, and therefore you never aspired. in politics, i want to tell you that i was a wonderful exemplary wife when my husband was taken to serve. i took a small child, went after him, lived in the village, stoked laundry stoves, boiled on kerosene gas in a barn. well, and so on and so on. and by the way, cutlets fried cutlets very well. i like more

my cutlets, my favorite food, that is, you know, one thing never interfered with another. that is, you understand, but i always understood for me how the priority of this family has always been more important for a woman and the child a small child should be next to her mother, mother will never be a nanny, no one will replace and it was always a priority, so i did not strive. i didn’t think that fate would endure this policy for me, it happened, that is, i didn’t aspire to this career. that's how it happened, that's how it happened, and nothing ever happens in life. random, that's it. uh, so you have to. but this is your destiny and your cross. yes , carry it the way you do, you know, that's how it happened. and as for the madam, and tikhonovsky now. well, recently somewhere on tv will accept. well, he's so a little mellow, that for me. yes, probably, the fact is that i do not think that it is she who decides

is understood. it was decided for her that it was necessary and, uh, but her husband, uh, is sitting. well, this can somehow be such a substitute, but she fell for it. and now, probably, she has entered the role, but i it seems that it's not even worth talking about this person at all, in my opinion, well , everything was blown away there. here, in my opinion, there is no future, no matter how pumped up, that is, to be honest, this character is absolutely not interesting to me. i don’t see even the slightest political future there, so are they interesting and sufficient ? this is a choice of further development path, well, geopolitical

vector, so a favorite moment for trying color revolutions. naturally, the protest in russia, well, let's say it's exactly the same. so, if nothing works out with our countries during the electoral period, yes, then why does the opposition not change tactics or, after all, elections have always been and will be the most vulnerable place for manipulation. that 's your opinion, and you know the elections. and as a pretext, as a pretext, but in the political technological cynical strategies of western strategists, the topic is always vulnerable. revenge is there through which you can to carry out color revolutions to put their own. eh, let's say dolls. well, in the sense of their followers and so on and so forth. that is , you understand these technologies, if earlier in a number of countries, when this was still happening, and we, for our part, were not ready, but then we learned how to analyze it. we see this trend, which

went from there, there, and so on and so forth, so the most important thing, when you see a trend, yes, and respond to it in a timely manner, that is, work ahead of the curve so that, let's say, these guys' plans do not come true , so i think that we e pretty. i think your lessons are serious. yes, mistakes, work on mistakes has been done, lessons have been done. eh, let's say i've come to a conclusion. we also do not sit in vain and what is my appearance. uh, as chairman of the central election commission. they are not random either. this happened after a very serious conversation with the president. and since well, he and i have known each other for a long time, he knows my pros and cons, that something is a sin lurking. e, i come all the time saying something unpleasant , yes, well, apparently useful and e, yes, it should be

such and uh, here we immediately became. yes, you understand this, well, the experience of a politician. i have been in all aspects of legislative power. i created a lot, that is, i earned money for the development of civil society. that is, he is much hypostasis, which allows me to form some kind of strategy. yes, and at the same time, that is, here we are, i understand. you understand that the main conclusion with what i had to see my colleagues in the central election commission. we, despite the fact that we have 15 people, all representatives of different parties are self-sufficient people with different views. we are unanimous. that's unanimous on the fundamental issues of development. what does that mean? this means who is the main judge for us? who are we working for? what are we working for where? whatever

the light of the west or someone to whom, maybe to please anyone. we work, the main judge - this is our selective our people and whether they trust us. so the elections, if they believe the results of the elections, if they believe that the results are reliable. so, it means that we have completed our task and it is on this that we are working on huge mistakes. that is, what would be wrong, what needs to be changed. and we set the goal of this task, so that trust does not grow from year to year. natural trust is real trust is hard work is the hardest our electoral system is very complex. i don't have vertical leverage there to force it. uh, we don't have anyone. all our commissions there consist of half different parties. there, from representatives of the housing committees of the society, there, well, and so on. e different

organizations of officials according to the law we have supposed that there were also no more than half. that's not not half of the party. and with us we are with him up to 6% no more. yes, that is, we have a commission for everything, the lower the level of the precinct. this is almost under a million people, but 100,000 commission is absolutely a cross section of society. that's what kind of society such a commission. that's what you have here is your neighbor your brother? and so on, here they are all in the commission. and it was very important. you see, i realized that the main thing is incredible patience, the ability to find compromises, reach consensus and the ability to convince. if you want to spend your laziness, it must convince it on a level the central election commission is on a par with the regions. we still have a federal state. i just can't appoint someone. no, if they have legislator

power, if executive power, and you need to find an acceptable mountain on the chairman, who is already at their level as a subject. here again, different members of the commission from different parties must throw off complex complex structures. and with all this democracy and complexity, as a society, the structure is the ability to draw a line. what are we talking about for maximum openness and transparency? guys you opposition what we did? yes, do not tear your open doors. if you want to check, go we have created all the conditions for full-fledged observation in any country in the world. this is not the case, a multi-stage system of control and observation, not a single western country of a tenth share can withstand the control that we have in how it passes our

partners for democratic ones. let's say so. here are just a few words. i do not want. eh, a very long touch. yes, but it's still 402 million americans who voted by mail out of 150. yes well, as a professional, you can appreciate the scale of the 8 million disenfranchised, a complete ban on international surveillance in 17 states. and they have criminal liability. e for the approach. to the polling station at a distance of less than 200 m. yes, i really like it, actually not everywhere, but there are in the states that define observations in this way. here in this situation. yes. eh, maybe it makes sense for us not to pay attention at all to all these conclusions of the osce international missions that the bse yes, and, in principle, forget about this is like a nightmare and focus solely on the domestic electorate. well, we

have, of course, also allied bodies, there are the cis and observers, those who are objectively suitable, they can be invited, and let's speak frankly. why should we feed the people who mandatory their imprisonment. we know 10 years ahead. i will do so. do you understand that we have already begun to do this, because? you know, if i say, when i said everything, that so lord, this is how we will be well, i think, well, fool, naive in early ninety. yes, but listen, now it’s okay, then we didn’t know much. yes, here i am now, well, from the height of that experience, that we have gone through these 30 years, when everything fell into place, when i drop all the masks, when we see the price of freedom of speech. here is a symbol of freedom of speech western - this is julia marijuana. yes, when we see human rights in the form of diktat. uh, sorry uh. well, i don't know perverts. well, the performance of perverts sometimes, yes, that is, these are anomalies of potology the dictator should be normal,

when you even need to be a normal person be ashamed of it. i won't. when you know, when we already see all this, you have to be absolutely or not want not to hear, not to see this, in order to continue to talk about some western values. yes, in the original form, as they are yes, and defend it, yes or you just have to be a notorious scoundrel or but i don’t know or or but a reasonable person, open, albeit honest, who wants to see. he sees everything, in fact, what is happening. well, since we have been at the cis level for a long time, we have developed our own standards. we them offered the air force yes, that is, these are these two. er, they 've been pointed out to these double standards many times. well uh, you understand what to take with the organization, we even see the united nations organization take the import take all the international organizations

in fact they are all american dictates. well, let's say publicity. it is now more than ever manifested or will be a skill, in your opinion in our way, here we are. here is my how it is the golden billion. well, we don't care about everyone else, now it 's already seven. yes, 8 billion. here we are one and we will be out you like vampires suck your intelligence your resources any resources. we will live for you. and you excuse me, you are dying, you are degrading as you like, we do not need you. that is, if you take all these beautiful words and chips, then here it is exactly like that, and if it is our way, then you have a chance to be there as a half-rule vassal, well, be hmm or we will destroy you here organization. you look like all organizations. now they're playing along. we do see. it makes no sense to cast pearls in front of sorry no it makes no sense to throw anything, one must proceed from the interests of

one’s people, one’s national traditions of cultural history and modern challenges for ta that must be overcome in order for the country of the society of the state to develop, all this is the main thing, and here one must be very honest and strong and have strength of mind. and sure he does and find common ground. most. the main thing is instead of quarreling over trifles inside to unite on the main thing, and then decide on the nuances, so now, at least, this trend is everything more we have e he is gaining strength. and you are working on it. we have long understood that even here from our experience. yes, i did a lot, well, i communicated on all platforms with many international organizations in general, including human rights organizations. what i noticed, not even that he was sad from sadness, but an incredible degradation. that's not only

international institutions, but those who are used to, they know, spoiled, they once spoiled, and this led to degradation from the fact that they have little monopoly on the truth. here they come. they they begin to teach, they broadcast. and we, opening our mouths and widening our eyes, listen yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, you understand, and when it has passed, here comes the insight well, they would give us a good floor, you see, we began to shake off and we saw. and what is behind this? what is really behind this? and it turned out that they believed this truth at the last station, that is, let's paint over it with phrases. this is the human rights club with which they drove us in the right direction, but also many others . excuse me, all sorts of chips, in fact. this way to secure a wonderful existence.

all of europe has prospered for many years thanks to our energy resources. but in fact, the quality of life has been raised. well, let's try it differently now, but they don't want to admit it, what turned out to be what. yes, they have forgotten how to reasonably put aside their point of view, as soon as they begin to make any claims to you. and you can’t take me with your bare hands with your experience. yes, and right there, for each of them, he begins to reasonably refute all positions, what is happening? you know i have many times this observed is lost, they are simply lost. because here they have a narrow-mindedness and dogmatism of thinking, which now prevails , look at many politicians the leader of opportunities at the eu level and this is the european commission and so on and so forth. she taught them. it is reasonable

to convince people that they are right, and when you begin to present a different point of view to them. they are all the time belizean and nakomy, what is she thinking, they have no answers, they are lost and that's it. so, this should be banned, because this is propaganda, and that's it. everything. here is their answer to everything. i sadly observe this degradation on the one hand i think about it. well, guys, what kind of work deserve this? yes, i fully support, well, as a tough person. i generally think that it should be set. now, if we put a red line on a red line, then it must necessarily not be simply fulfilled. you know, uh, hitting back has to be the norm, otherwise , we'll be squabbling all the time. unfortunately, therefore, i cannot but touch, literally briefly, on the topic of my own, because that i am very impressed with your position, so about. here in russia they decided not to flirt with traitors. and vladimir putin made an amendment to the

accepted one. in the first reading of the law, the possibility of depriving acquired citizenship. yes, i remember your words. we are proud of our men, and let the rats run with their tails between their legs. here is the deprivation of citizenship for those who escaped the draft. yes , it is not provided for in the law as a separate norm, it may be necessary to introduce and understand such norms and fill in the agent, let's say more serious meaning, and not just as an ambassador. you know, i also thought about this for a long time, and we have such discussions going on. here , uh, in the blogosphere, that is, people are hard, going through everything that happens, just, that is, here are many supporters of tough measures, i understand how difficult it is for our president, because such the greatest pressure is what he took, in general

, on which he sent his fate. yes, in order to save this russian world. this is ours, that is, the opportunity to preserve their value systems, in general, their own country. yes, just like that, but the very thing identity. it is very difficult when, like this, everything over you thickens even inside. we are having this discussion. so i think you know, even in general in the nature of bringing your own. yes, and there is what is in what our strength is our weakness. this is a great soul. yes, yes, it’s impossible for the civilian population of our brothers, the ukrainians are our brothers. god forbid that, probably, the population suffered. no need to destroy there, you understand, it's sort of and that's why everything goes like this. somehow it goes, yes, come on, well, why close the borders, this is now the balts, for whom the entire soviet union worked, they kept the language and so on, now they are closing and saying that it is a privilege for us to enter europe, yes, but and so on. and we

openly come to the borders, the guys come to us, that is, we and what is the strength on the other side? that's where the strength lies. the fact that there is absolute evil, without any without any moral and ethical framework. we can afford everything we can openly lie. we can frankly borrow. there, terrorist acts arrange anything, because this is absolute evil without restraints in this and strength and weakness. yes, that is the philosophical question. i don't want to go deep into it. but this strength is great from the soul, and from strength or for yourself , this weakens generosity. yes, that is, absolute evil, when you go to everything with rushing around the frame, in the end . what are you going to win? or to what or to hell? this is a difficult question, but you know those measures, it’s just that we know from our own, so in everything

we are specialists, all of us are specialists, in what they used to be in football in hockey then everyone became a comedy specialists, but now she's all specialists. uh-huh, but the president. i meet him all know the president he has to go between scylla and charybdis the task has been set a lot over the years. he collects the country, it was destroyed before, and he began to collect it, and he knows more, he knows more than we do, well, let's say, well, let's say, but some nuances that are dictated here. these in this way, therefore, in this case, i am not a judge and cannot. i don't consider myself an expert. here in this sphere, but in fact here now, if my personal point of view as a citizen. i understand

that now when everything is manifested. and what we have in our society is also at its zenith and there is enough inside. it's like metastases launched for 30 years. i mean, uh, let's say they broke our mentality, our perception of value. it's like a cancer she is, if uh, you know there are people who uh, who are the most positions we have know who ran the most now. here are those who, under any regimes of interruption of power, were in chocolate, they received everything, and they are the most dissatisfied. yes, this is it. yes it is clear. and uh here i don’t know, i don’t know how to say it, but i’m also thinking about it, how to pull it out. here are the metastases. yes, there is a culture. yes? now , gradually, along with this, now society has begun

to react negatively immediately to pathology in art very quickly than before. before, society turned a blind eye, and now the authorities have to respond to the activity of society, in the culture of higher science, higher education in schools. here, i see that the strength of society, which has thrown itself out. that's 30 years coming. we are on the mountain property. yes, here it is here to compromise there. yes, maybe they are right there. and when we saw everything, this is what is happening, and now you know the people, ours somehow straightened up. this is the shoulders yes, the feeling, this is one’s own dignity, national civil dignity and such a topic as justice has never been like this with us, it has always been, but now there is a heightened feeling, and i always tell my people. to my colleagues, my dear colleagues, with each subsequent election, the demands from our voters of the society for our work will be grow to all levels of government. if yesterday

they turned a blind eye to some kind of corruption, to disgrace, to an official, to something else, heightened feelings now, especially when our muscles don’t close their eyes to anything, therefore, these are all things and therefore such categoricalness and without compromise, and it is understandable, and close to me our guys shed blood. excuse life for having a camp, so that it, well, destroyed it, as frankly they want. just recently, the senator said that russia is orthodox, so it must be destroyed. they don't hide it. why should we pretend about these partners. they made us enemies. it means why should he smile, so i also believe that i also think that these are still great thinkers who spoke about this, they will repeat quotes with an external enemy. we 'll fix it faster if but only if you can handle the internals. here with

betrayal with internal betrayal with internal. well, how do you say it? well, it's probably not like the fifth column. yes, but with those who are trying to destroy us from the inside. this here, let's say you can't. and here i believe that yes, we must be more uncompromising and tougher. i like this approach. this is alexander, let's, then, unfortunately, the last one is about a philosophical question, so such in the ussr, it was you, the granddaughter of a kulak peasant, as you yourself said, but i knew about it, but i chose, as an excellent student and a model, yes, give khrushchev flowers when he came to tashkent yes, i believe that even then you were so young and principled and conscious, well , somehow it doesn’t happen. so what does the child say they bring up up to 5 years, then they translate this deep

conviction, but now, having understood the undercurrents of geopolitics with such experience, yes, let's go straight to one of the political leaders. without gender yes, to present flowers here, if we speak from this nerve of today. i would not hand over to any of the political leaders, i would now give my own and pride, respect, admiration and gratitude. i would give you a bouquet. here is a generalized unknown soldier here, and you see, here i am , especially yesterday it was about this connection of a child, who are nameless, who died in the brest fortress for what we were, who are now dying defending donbass and took out children. i know

what it is the fourteenth year, no one noticed did not want it wonderful, yes, which went to defend. here is our world yes, our freedom e. and many also do this not for glory, but because this is their conviction for the motherland, for their family. here's to me now. this is a hero, but with all my deepest respect. uh, and i think that god bless and god bless our president as well. this is not discussed. well, at least i am considered from independence from this government, because the election commission is included. she does not go to the executive branch, not to the legislature. she has independence. well, uh, well, you understand, he knows i'm not a fan. here comes the compliment. he 's in his place as president. god bless him and in my face and in the face of the majority of the

absolute majority of russians, he is strong, because we know what he is going for, then we are together. but now it is very important to support our guys and for me here. they're doing right now. the one who went himself, he went and knows what you know for what. i recently smear helped the bed here the universe. and here comes. we helped uh, it's very difficult and amazing woman from donbass so she says, well, it's dangerous, how is it there? that's what, than usual, that i'm already all i'm already there and lost my son. i lost it to him, i will go to the end, and at one time, when i helped liza greenka kids climb out of there wounded children wounded here. yes, and since the fourteenth year, no one in the world needs you. these are not people. they didn't see any of this. didn't

see it. well, spit it was, it's scary. lisa brought this. i helped drive. i know this, i have a completely different picture, i was being reflected, where are you, where are you international human rights organizations? why don't you see it? now they have seen the light, then i'm sorry like that. here she is sitting in front of me. a simple woman from the donbass, what is her there? yes i will be i future commission there i wish for us it is important. my husband left you to defend since the fourteenth year, my son left. and now grandson, what do i have to lose, they are for us, and i am for them. therefore, for me, these people these people who survived such a tragedy, you know, here, when i meet them, i myself want to pull myself up to become better. but, if we have to reach out people who have

experienced terrible and here they are for me there is a hero. thank you for this very frank conversation. for those who want to keep abreast of new developments. with the development of science. many problems are left behind, however, our researchers do not stop their work, but in the modern world. well, it’s like it’s already about 40 and you sometimes forget what happened yesterday, maybe this is the same thing and you need to see a doctor. i ask how alzheimer's disease specialists have - it is always accompanied by dementia manifestations. yes, that is the same dementia today microbiological preparations. this topical is very topical generally not environmentally friendly low-quality products. this is a guarantee of the health of

our population, everyone is trying to draw for themselves this picture of such a positive old one, and when they asked the question, so what should be done. everybody think about it, watch the popular science project science mania on belarus 24 tv channel. he knew that his experiments were life-threatening, but continued them despite the warnings of reputable scientists. your eyes can't take it anymore, the young scientist has made a sensational discovery. how many years of centuries scientists have been going to this, not knowing what the result will be and this is just one example. he managed to refute the theory of world luminaries of science about the impossibility of obtaining oxygen in liquid form by oxygen. it's impossible. watch

the documentary film sigmund in rublevsky hot oxygen on saturday on belarus 24 tv channel. hello , in this episode, a new addition to the belarusian army today, more than 6,000 recruits took the military oath.