it collapsed for the first time when i was appointed minister of social protection, that is, this is the most difficult time. uh, late 1991. it was just here on january 15 november uh-huh actually. today we have 1791 today. so this is the horror of 31 years ago, huh? and when horror came to me, my classmates, who i am an electronics engineer, and ended up with them and my guys, all oblique students worked in it in boxes in others, everyone began to close everything began to collapse. all were yesterday. they were democrats. everyone wanted change, but today they were left without anything without understanding. moreover, and in this horror and chaos, but they became when i saw how to tell you. the new owners are those who felt like the new owners of the international

monetary fund of the world bank, which opened the offices of high officials with their feet. i remember, probably, how they started to offer the minister there, well, in fact, if these recommendations are here , then this means in fact. i divided it by 10 , didn’t say anything, and realized that it was actually about extinction. it is a closure, and there are not only mines, but high. i would say high production. at us the same, well, even the tv did the military-industrial complex can. and yes, i wanted yes, so that we attach pans highly qualified working class personnel were taken away degraded and, uh, dump dirty primitive technologies from there from europe, leave only this high intellectual it. yes, the most suggestion. this is it. to be honest, i kicked me out of the office and said that i uh, i don't have to uh anymore. it

's impossible, but you said, i was in the democratic opposition. for the first time i expressed in russia and left the government. this is precisely from a democratic government, when i saw that the roll is like this, that is, reform in the economy does not correlate with the victims, in fact, due to the greatest social human losses, this can happen, then there is no balance, and because they did not hear me. i left the government. that is , at that time i was in the opposition, just in the democratic it became yes to the government and to yeltsin and, well, then, so you know, that is, i was in different positions. i was their putin in opposition at the time. yes, we are with him for the first time the first woman who walked. yes, as a presidential candidate , just when he was elected for the first time, yes, yes, therefore, uh, well, i have my own understanding of justice, such a luxurious

biography, because here it will even go a little deeper. yes, look, you were still a people's deputy in the soviet union yes, the people were a deputy yes, 89 years old. uh, minister of the black sea region, when he was the chairman of the government to the state duma deputies under yeltsin but look, then this would be, perhaps i was a minister at the same time, and i was a minister there for only 2 1/2 years, and at that time, yes, just like a minister in kaluga, she was also elected a deputy. that is, i am in two qualities. yes, they were the commissioner for human rights. yes, just recently, you know, after i left. uh, vot resigned from the government. that is, this is a voluntary departure, that is, resignation. i have not been an official for a long time, it is generally difficult for me to be an official. i'm a very free person, it's hard for me. i can't just obey. i do need convinced that if i'm here i agree, i believe

in what i'm told i should do it, so for a long time i had difficulty. it should be. well , given quickly. consciously thought. i must believe in it. i left and i was for a long time, well, as in the free police, however, i was generally on a voluntary basis led the social councils under yeltsin , but it was all on a voluntary basis and for the first time. after this a long break, that is, consider this the beginning of the ninety-fourth year, when i left in the fourteenth year, that's two. how long has it been 320 years? yes, just 20 years later. i returned to the state structure. yes, an institution, since there was a unanimous proposal from both sides for me, both from human rights activists and from the president, to head this institution. it was a historic event for me, and march of the fourteenth

year. in the morning he invites me to the state duma and approves me there. which authorized human rights in the afternoon, i'm going to the kremlin for a historic event, when the agreement on the crimea was signed and my first trip was to the crimea because. well, uh, so many questions arose at once that i had to do this right away from the spot in my career. well , look, you ran for the presidency in 2000, yes, since you have already touched on this topic. well , let's say that everyone would, yes, such hopelessness, but still, uh, i don't want to involve you in the female language, right? please, but i want to draw an analogy, surely you followed the elections in belarus in 2020. and now it’s clear to me personally, how, as a person with such experience, well,

we have listed yes, only some of the positions in which you were and how a person with such experience and knowledge can apply for the position of president well, the presidential post, but here’s how our e a fairy to go to the polls with such a store of knowledge as she has, i can’t understand this, well, you see, two categorically different situations and candidates. here. alexandra, after all, what are you talking about do you think this? i don't want to impose my opinion, and yet it's not about the genes. you know, it’s very difficult for me to impose some kind of opinion, so you know, you and i didn’t talk about one very important consequence, in which, but i started. i started a master in production when all my classmates asked for it. i said no. i want to work in production, and she worked at the factory for 12 years and started as a foreman. eh, these taught me, they taught us at the institute, thank you. god not only solder, but also welding there, uh, you understand, i would work

not only with the head, but with the hands. yes, that is, i also had a workshop. i have from all at first 120 men, i will say no, the girls are there, uh, a little over 20 years. yes, it was not just that you were respected somewhere. at first, i ran the construction for them in six months. here is the character. you yourself passed, do you know from the ground? you know what heavy production is, dangerous production, you are in the midst of people, you do not come off the ground. you pass, you gain quality gradually, this experience, a person understands, it doesn’t matter what gender you are, a woman man, well, thank god we have two sexes. we are in none of the 99 transgender people of disbelief. we will never have this, i have no doubt. even the quality of the personality is important. and what do you have in your soul, and what can you offer people, and what can you convince them of, and you can see

people in something, if you yourself have lived it, felt it , realized it, thought it through, yes, then people can believe, but therefore, she never aspired to politics. i want to tell you that i was a wonderful exemplary wife when my husband was hired to serve. i took a small child and followed him. lived in she stoked the stoves, boiled the laundry on kerosene gas in the shed. well, and so on and so on. and by the way, cutlets fried cutlets very well. i love my cutlets more , my favorite food, that is, you know, yes, one never interfered with the other. that is, you understand, but i always understood for me how it was always more important for a woman to have a priority - this is a family and a child, a small child should be next to her mother. mom is never a nanny, no one will replace it, and it was always a priority, so i didn’t aspire. i didn't think that fate would endure this politics it happened, that is, did not aspire to

this career. so it happened, it happened, it happened, and in life there is never anything accidental, that's it. uh, so you have to. but this is your destiny and your cross. yes , carry it the way you do, you know, that's how it happened. and as for the madam, and now tikhonovsky has recently been seen somewhere on tv. well, he is so a little irritated that i, yes, probably, the fact is that i don’t think that it is she who decides what is understood. it was decided for her that it was necessary and uh, but her husband uh sits. well, this can somehow be such a substitute. ah, but she fell for it and now, probably, she has entered the role, but it seems to me that it’s not even worth talking about this person at all, in my opinion, well, everything was blown away there. here , in my opinion, there is no future, no matter how

pumped up, that is, to be honest, this character is absolutely not interesting to me. i don’t see even the slightest political future there, so i could have a little opinion, it’s interesting, yes, enough alexander the elections in belarus yes, that’s it with us it is always not just a day of voting for a certain person. this is a choice of a further development path, and of a geopolitical vector, therefore, a favorite moment for trying color revolutions. naturally, the protest in russia, well, let's say it's exactly the same. so, if nothing works out with our countries during the electoral period, yes, then why does the opposition not change tactics or, after all, elections have always been and will be the most vulnerable place for manipulation. that's your opinion, and you know the elections. and as an occasion as an excuse, as are

in political technological cynical strategies of western strategists. always those vulnerable revenge there through which you can carry out color revolutions to put your own. eh, let's say dolls. well, in the sense of their followers and so on and so forth. that is , you understand these technologies, if earlier in a number of countries, when this was still happening, and we, for our part , were not ready, but then you learned to analyze it. we see this trend, which went from there, there, and so on and so forth, so the most important thing is when you see trend, yes, and respond to it in time in such a way, that is, work ahead of the curve, so that, well, let's say, the plans of these guys do not come true, therefore, i think that we are enough. i think your lessons are serious. yes bugs work on the bugs produced produced lessons. eh, let's say i

drew conclusions. we also do not sit in vain and what is my appearance. uh, as chairman of the central election commission. they, too, did not accidentally happen after a very serious conversation with the president. and since well, he and i have been friends for a long time friend know knows my pros and cons something else sin lurks. uh, i come all the time saying something unpleasant, yes, well, apparently useful and e yes, and uh, here we immediately became. yes, you understand this, well, the experience of a politician. i was in all forms of legislative for executive power. i created a lot, that is, i earned money for the development of civil society. that is, i have a lot of incarnations that allow me to form some kind of strategy. yes and a at the same time, that is, we i understood. you understand that

the main conclusion with what i had and colleagues see mine at the central election commission. we, despite the fact that we have 15 people , all representatives of different parties are self-sufficient people with different views. we are unanimous. that's unanimous on the fundamental issues of development. what does that mean? this means who is the main judge for us? who are we working for? we that work for where, to light there of the west or someone to whom we will please nobody. we work, the main judge - these are our selective our people. and if they trust us. means choices if they believe election result, if they believe that the results are reliable. so, it means that we have completed our tasks and it is on this that we are working on huge mistakes. that is, what would be wrong, what needs to be changed. and we set a goal to set

this task so that trust does not grow from year to year. natural trust is real trust is hard work is the hardest our electoral system is very complex. i don't have vertical leverage there to force it. uh, we don't have anyone. in our country, all the commissions there consist half of a party of different half there with representatives of the housing committees of the society, there, well, and so on. e different organizations of officials according to the law we have supposed that there were also no more than half. that's not half the party. and with us we are with them up to 6% no more. yes, that is, we have a commission for everything, the lower the level, the district police officer is replaced. people same 100,000 commission is absolutely a cross section of society. that's what kind of society such a commission. that's what you have here is your neighbor your brother? and so on, here they are all in

the commission. and it was very important. here you see, here i am i realized that the main thing is incredible patience, the ability to find compromises, reach consensus and the ability to convince. if you want to spend your laziness, it should convince you at the level of the central electoral commission - this is at the level with the regions. we still have a federal state. i just can't appoint someone. no, if they have their own power to legislate, if they have executive power, and it is necessary to find an acceptable mountain on the chairman, who is already at their level as a subject. here again, different members of the commission from different parties must fold complex complex structures. and with all this democracy and complexity, as a society, the structure is the ability to draw a line. on what on the

maximum openness of transparency we say you guys are the opposition, what have we done? yes, do not tear your open doors. if you want to check, go we have created all the conditions for full-fledged monitoring in any country in the world. this is not the case, a multi-stage system of control and surveillance, not a single western country of a tenth share can withstand the control that we have in how it goes in our partners. yes, democratic yes, let's say so. here are just a few words. i do not want. eh, a very long touch. yes, but it's still 402 million americans who voted by mail out of 150 that's, well, as a professional you can estimate the scale and 8 million deprived of the right to vote a complete ban on international surveillance in 17 states, uh, they have criminal liability. e for the approach. to the polling station at a distance of less than 200 m.

yes, i really like it, in fact, not everywhere, but there are in the states that define this way of observation. here in this situation. yes. well, maybe it makes sense for us not to pay attention at all to all these conclusions of international osce missions, that bse yes, and in principle forget about it, like a nightmare and focus solely on domestic electorates. well, we have, of course, also allied bodies, there are the cis and observers, those who are objectively suitable, they can be invited, and let's speak frankly. why should we feed the people who mandatory their imprisonment. we know 10 years ahead. yes, we will do so, you see, we have already begun to do so, because. you know, if i say, when i said that the lord is like that, well, naive fool. naive yes, listen, now

it's okay, then we didn't know much. yes, here i am now, well, from the height of that experience. this is what we have gone through these 30 years, when everything fell into place, when i will throw off all the masks, when we see the price of freedom of speech. here is a symbol of freedom of speech western - this is juliana sanych yes, when we see human rights in the form of diktat. uh, sorry uh. well, i i don't know perverts. well pervert. well, the dictates of perverts sometimes, yes, that is, these are pathological anomalies, the dictator is normal, when you even have to be ashamed of being a normal person. this. i will never let you know, when we already see all this, one must be absolutely or not want not to hear not to see this in order to continue to talk about some western values. yes, in the original form, as they are yes, and defend it, yes or you just have to be taken away. lazy bastard or but i don't know or hmm or or but reasonable

an open, even honest person who wants to see, he sees everything, in fact, what is happening. well, since we have been at the cis level for a long time, we have developed our own standards. we offered them. you would this, yes, that is, these two. er, they 've been pointed out to these double standards many times. well uh, you know what to take with the organization, we even see the united nations take it. take all the international organizations , in fact they are all american dictates. well, let's say the anglo-saxons. he is like this now never manifested or will be a skill, in your opinion in our way, here we are. here is my how it is the golden billion. well, we don't care, everyone else is now seven. yes, 8 billion. here we are alone and we will be of you, like vampires, to suck out your intellectual capabilities, your resources, any resources. we will live for you. and you excuse me, you are dying, you are degrading as you like, we do not need you. that is, if you

take the essence of all these beautiful words and chips. here she is exactly like that, and if it is our way, then you have a chance to be there as a half-ravasal it be hmm or you got destroyed. here is the organization. and you look like all organizations. here look now play along. we do see. it makes no sense to throw pearls in front of sorry, there is no point in throwing anything; you have to proceed from the interests of your people, your national traditions, cultural history and modern challenges for the one that needs to be overcome in order for the country of the society of the state to develop, all this is the main thing, and here you have to be very honest and strong and have fortitude. and i'm sure he doing and finding common ground. most. the main thing is, instead of quarreling over trifles inside , unite on the main thing, and then decide on the

nuances, so now, at least, this trend is becoming more and more with us. it is gaining strength. and you are working on it. we have long understood that even here from our experience. yes, i did a lot, well, i communicated on all platforms with many international organizations in general, including human rights organizations. what i noticed, not even with sadness, but with sadness, but an incredible degradation, not only of international institutions, but those who are used to, you know, got spoiled, they once got spoiled, and this led to degradation from the fact that they have little monopoly on the truth. here they come. they begin to teach they broadcast. and we open our mouths and listen wide once in our eyes , yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, you understand, and when it's gone, it comes. epiphany well, they would give us

a good floor, you know, we became. here we shook ourselves off and we saw. and what is behind this? what is really behind this? and it turned out that after believing this truth at the last station, that is, let's color it with phrases. this is the human rights club with which they drove us in the right direction, but also many others. excuse me, all sorts of chips, in fact. this is a way to ensure a wonderful existence. all of europe has prospered for many years thanks to our energy resources. but in fact, the quality of life has been raised. well, let's try it differently now, but they don't want to admit it, what turned out to be what. yes, they have forgotten how to reasonably put aside their point of view, as soon as they begin to make any claims to you. and me naked you can't take your experience with your hands. yes, right there, at

each of them, they begin to reasonably refute all positions, what is happening? you know, i've watched this many times get lost, they just get lost. because here they have a narrow-mindedness and dogmatic thinking, which now prevails , look at many politicians. take a leader at the level of the eu, and this is the european commission and so on and so forth. she taught them. it is reasonable to convince people that they are right, and when you begin to present a different point of view to them. they are all the time whites on commission. what a fantasy they have no answers, they are lost and that's it. you start it should be banned, because it's propaganda, that's all. here is their answer to everything. i sadly observe this degradation on the one hand i think about it, guys, what kind of work did they deserve? yes, i fully support, well, as a tough person. i generally think that it should be set. now, if we

put a red line on a red line, then it must necessarily not be simply fulfilled. you know, uh, hitting back must become the norm, otherwise otherwise, we'll be groveling all the time. unfortunately, therefore, i cannot but briefly touch upon the topic of my own, because i am very impressed with your position, therefore. here in russia they decided not to flirt with traitors. and vladimir putin made an amendment to the accepted one. in the first reading of the law, the possibility of depriving acquired citizenship. yes, i remember your words. we are proud of our men, and let the rats run with their tails between their legs. here is the deprivation of citizenship for those who escaped the draft. yes, it is not in the law provided as a separate norm, it may be necessary to introduce and understand such norms and

fill the agent with, let's say, a more serious meaning, and not just as a message. you know, i also thought about this for a long time, and we have such discussions going on. here, uh, in the blogosphere, that is, people are having a hard time, experiencing everything that happens, just, that is, here are many supporters of tough measures, i understand how difficult it is for our president, because such the greatest pressure is what he took at all to whom he sent his fate. yes, in order to save this russian world. this is ours, that is, the opportunity to preserve their value systems, in general, their own country. yes, like e self-identity, it is very difficult when, like this, everything above you thickens even inside. we are having this discussion. so i think you know, even in general in the character of a cast. here, yes there, there is what our strength is, our weakness. this is a

great soul. yes, yes, it’s impossible for the civilian population of our brothers, the ukrainians are our brothers. god forbid that, probably, the population suffered. no need destroy there, that's something you understand, it's sort of and that's why everything goes like this. somehow it’s going like this, yes, come on, well, why close the borders, this is now, uh, three bolts that the hanging union worked, they kept the language and so on, then they are now closing and saying that it is a privilege to enter europe for us , yes, but and so on. and we openly come to the borders, the guys come to us, that is, we and what is the strength on the other side? that's where the strength lies. the fact that there is absolute evil, without any without any moral and ethical framework. we can let all of us can frankly lie to ourselves. we can be honest. there, terrorist acts are arranged by anything, because this is an

absolute evil without restraints in this, both strengths and weaknesses. yes, that is, this is a philosophical question. i don't want to go deep into it. but this power is great, the respite from the power. or are you weakening yourself? this is generosity, right? that is, absolute evil, when you go to everything with rushing around the frame, in the end. what are you going to win? or why or important? this is a difficult question, but you know those measures, we just with our you know, it means that in everything we are specialists, all of us are specialists, in which they used to be in football in hockey then everyone became specialists in comedy, but now she is all specialists. uh-huh, but the president. i meet with him and i know the president he has to go between scylla and charybdis, the task has been set a lot for these waters. he collects the country , it was destroyed before, and he began to collect it, and he

knows more, he knows more than we do, well, let's say, well, let's say, but some nuances that are dictated here. these are thus therefore, in this case, i am not a judge and can not. i don't consider myself an expert. here in this area, but really here now, if my personal point of view, as a citizen. i understand that now when everything is manifested. and what do we have in our society too. excuse enough and there is inside. it's like metastases launched for 30 years. i mean, uh, let's say they broke our mentality, our perception of value. it's like a cancerous tumor, if uh, you know there are people who have the most position we know who ran the most

now those who, under any regimes, had breaks in power were in chocolate, they got everything, and they are the most dissatisfied. yes, this is it. yes it is clear. and uh, here i would not know, i don’t know how to say it, but i’m also thinking about this, how to pull out this metastasis here. yes , there is a culture. yes? now, gradually, along with this, now society has begun to react negatively immediately to pathology in art very quickly than before. before, they closed their eyes now with society and the authorities have to respond to the activity of society. in the culture of higher science higher education in schools. here, i see that the strength of society, which has thrown itself off. that's 30 years coming. we are on the mountain, actually the song. yes , we need to compromise here. yes, maybe they are right there. and when we

saw everything, this is what is happening, and now you know the people, ours somehow straightened up. here is this shoulders, yes felt. this is the dignity of national dignity. civil dignity and such a craving for justice, and we have never always had it like this, but now a heightened feeling, and i tell mine all the time. well, to my colleagues, my dear colleagues, with each subsequent election, the demands on the part of our voters of the society for our work will increase for us and for all levels of government. if yesterday they turned a blind eye to some kind of corruption, to disgrace, to an official, to something else, heightened feelings now, especially when our muscles don’t close their eyes to anything, therefore, these are all things and therefore such categoricalness and without compromise, and it is understandable, and close to me our guys shed blood. excuse life for the fact that the country was, that it was , well, destroyed, as frankly they want. just

recently, the senator said that russia is orthodox, so it must be destroyed. they don't hide it. why should we pretend about these partners. they made us enemies. it means why should he smile, so i also believe that i also think that it is still great thinkers who spoke about this and will not repeat quotes with an external enemy. we'll get through it faster if but only if you get through the inside. here with betrayal, with inner betrayal with internal e. well, how do you say it? well, that's probably not the way it is, the fifth column. yes, but with those who are trying to destroy us from the inside. here it is, let's say it's impossible. and here i believe that yes, we must be more uncompromising and tougher. i like this approach. this is alexander, let's, then, unfortunately, the last one is about a philosophical question like this. in the ussr, it was you, the granddaughter of a peasant

kulak, as you yourself said, but i knew about it, but they chose you as an excellent student and a model, but give it as a gift, flowers khrushchev when he arrived in tashkent yes, i believe that even then you were so young and principled and conscious, well, somehow it doesn’t happen. so, what he says is that a child is brought up until the age of 5, then he translates this deep conviction, but now having understood the undercurrents of geopolitics with such experience. yes, let's go directly to any of the political leaders. you would be ready. without gender yes, to present flowers here, if we speak from this nerve of today . i would not hand over to any of the political leaders

, i would now give both mine and pride admiration and gratitude. i would give you a bouquet. here is a generalized unknown soldier here, and you see, here i am, especially yesterday it was about this connection of times, which were nameless, who died in the brest fortress so that we were, who are now dying to protect, donbass and children were taken out. i know that this is the fourteenth year, no one noticed, did not want it wonderful, yes, which went to defend. here is our world yes, our freedom e. and many also do it for glory, because this is their conviction for the motherland for your family. here's to me now. this is a hero, but with all my deepest respect. uh, and i think

that god bless and god bless our president as well. this is not discussed. well, at least i am considered from independence from this government, because the election commission is included. she does not go to the executive branch, not to the legislature . she has independence. well, uh, well, you understand, he knows i'm not a fan. that crushes a compliment, he is in his place as president. god bless him and in my face and in the face of the absolute majority of russians, he is strong, because they know what he is going for there and we are together. but now it is very important to support our guys and for me. they're doing right now. the one who went himself, went this way and knows what you know for what. i've recently helped to carry out the whole referral here comes. we

helped, eh, it's very difficult and amazing woman from donbass so she says, well, it's dangerous, how is it that how to help? what am i all about. i already lost my son there. and maybe lost, i'll go to the end, and at one time, when i helped lisa grinka children to take out wounded children from there, wounded here. dambasy, the fourteenth year, to no one. you are not in the world do not need. these are not people. they didn't see any of this. didn't see it. well, spit it was, it's scary. i brought this climb. i helped drive. i know this, i have a completely different picture, i was amazed, where are you, where are you, international human rights organizations. why don't you see it? now they have seen the light, then i'm sorry like that. here she is sitting in front of me. a simple woman with donbass than there it? yes i will i will be the tire

commission, there wishing for us it is important. my husband has left. you protect you from the fourteenth year my son left. and now it’s a grandson, what do i have to lose, they are for us, and i am for them. therefore, for me, here are these people. these people who survived such a tragedy, you know, here, when i meet them, i myself want to pull myself up to become better. but, if we have to reach out people who have experienced terrible things, and here they are for me there is a hero. thank you for this very frank conversation.

how long can you wait? it's just that, clearly you born of the species, may you remember very soon the joy. uy sam you are in our sky, our years are real. you only live here by christ to stumble just for

you to see. you will not forget about everyone, only the sky. good morning. good morning len is my tennis rocket do you happen to have it? yes, yesterday i tried to find her, and then i remembered that the only time i just played with you, but a year ago. exactly, but you if you find

the message.

fine. hello lena. hello. lena and why are you standing with an empty cup, waiting for the kettle to boil, i heard folk wisdom. if you want to boil the kettle, plug the plug into the socket. you've been kind of distracted lately and roma hasn't been seen for several days. how did you find it. what's wrong with you? everything is fine.

thank you please. hello, how did you find me? i am a spy. you have your school number in all social networks. i thought you'd be glad to see me. certainly a whole week.

well, will you show your city? let's go where are you in a hurry i don't want to be late i'm afraid to get a

reprimand from the authorities, and i already have enough problems at work. what's the problem? yes, i found out that lena has a lot of experience in south america asked to share. i'll write you an award for forbidden interests, the house of the tour. it's impossible to have a serious conversation with you.

well, well, i will arrange for lena to pass on her work to you. i shouldn't have, we just have to forget about it. fine. e enterprise thank you vanya sent. the first pictures of the shareholder. you will be ordered to watch this tour for the first time, it hurts you immediately want to go there. you're sorry, you couldn't

go with vanya, it's also very interesting. my dad said that there is no better place at home. and we said that you need to conquer the whole world and then any place will become your home. everything is in order alive and well, we just rarely communicate.

then in the evening andrei offered to meet. and for sure, listen, we have snow, just as we are going to the concert. we want andrey back and we want nika to go to australia. that's right. okay. bye. listen, i'm thinking, i really really need to sort out this bookkeeping. do you hear? brides

come on work.

i just wanted to recharge, i was charged with a good mood before the working day. you, by the way, went too. there are a number of shortcomings , they need to be corrected elena alexandrovna come to me. come on, come on, sit down.

so that you pass all the materials on south america to sony well, these are my contacts, my agreements. this is not a fact. when you show your presentation, i can show you the full route and photos tomorrow. here, don't freak out. i'm for your project , we'll see the final word for the shareholders. you already an hour i can not, probably get through, probably busy. don't worry. when a wife is twice as

young as her husband, there are reasons. thanks, can you do it.

all i left. what are you, well, this is purely business correspondence business but i don't like your new habit of getting into my phone, and i don't like that some lady demands an urgent meeting with you. hello.

just now i read your sms when you want to meet meet, i don’t necessarily need photos. thank you there are also a lot of photos. maybe we'll meet again. yes, there are a lot of them, really, and then i need your comments for sure. see you then.

such a place is amazing. of course. here, take it, i'll think, one such photo the whole presentation is worth it. i said i'll think about it.

what's going on are you not ashamed? she is married to her husband, a wonderful man, who loves her very much. are you accum? and you and vera just hugged near the entrance. clearly there is nothing more to say, yes, she is a very spontaneous woman and hugged me in a fit of insane delight. and she also loves her husband very much and is worried that she does not accept, and therefore i decided to arrange a birthday surprise for the boy in our folding room. i'm sorry, but that was easy. this is

like everything. previously, i presented countries in which i managed to visit myself, you have to rely on other people's impressions before the presentation , but life ends there. what did he send to himself when he was in nepal for the first time? here is the map of the national park. here it's routes this is about 20 days, it's very cool there, but you don't need to go there. fridge

come on, present your idea to me. regular exercise is the key to success management meeting this late hour i

don't control you like lena. you someone else is calling. oleg i'm busy. clear exactly therefore, the direction of extreme tourism has a huge chance of success applause. in this place will be very, by the way. no, it's great. okay, i

myself hear myself, how to interest people in what i myself am not sure of. i look at this beauty, i think about the terrible, unsanitary conditions and doubtful how to lead people there. yes, you understand, there will always be those who do not like something, but there will also be those who fall head over heels in love with these places. and when you fall in love, even what annoyed begins to seem.

damn i totally forgot. sorry, i'm a little late. do you want, come on another time. yes, well

. thank you. why are you looking at me like you're seeing me for the first time. let's go