for the citizens of sudan in connection with the floods that occurred in the country the day before , the weight of the cargo amounted to 39 tons and cost about 1 million belarusian rubles, it should be noted that the republic of belarus is an active humanitarian donor since 1999, the president of our country decided to provide humanitarian actions, 32 countries, humanitarian assistance of the republic of sudan is provided for the first time issues of assistance to the sudanese side to eliminate the consequences of a devastating flood was considered during the meeting of the minister of emergency situations of belarus sinyavsky saved sudan in minsk then the parties also determined the list of products that the people of the african state most of all currently need .

at the border committee, most of the residents of lithuania and latvia came to us over the weekend, more than 5,000 foreigners, guests and neighboring eu countries like to relax in our health resorts, watch belarusian attractions attract them and affordable prices in stores. belarusian designers have assembled a machine for the production of biodegradable packaging for vegetables and fruits; the novelty has completely replaced european equipment; the capacity allows packing up to 30 items per minute; the development has already shown interest in agricultural goods-producers of belarus ; russia; today the experimental plant has mastered e. about sixty new cars this and uh, planting potatoes, this is a bookmark for storage. this is a recess for the preservation of vegetable products. this is a pre-sale preparation, which includes washing and polishing and packaging. due to the fact that we are the only belarusian, and

the manufacturer of these products, there are sanctions, as if the company did not say at all, on the contrary. eh, if we take in relation to the last year, then we e volume of production is typical. the history of the brest fortress in letters and envelopes a philatelic exhibition opened in brest in exposition of postcards and telegrams over the past 200 years, the philatelic vernissage was dedicated to the 180th anniversary of the brest fortress. at the heart of the collection, exhibits from the second world war in total at the exhibition presented 60 items from belarus russia and armenia moldova israel poland and the united states some of the most interesting letters from soviet children that were sent to the front in messages children congratulated relatives on holidays and left drawings all stamps envelopes and exhibition letters from private collections. exclusive christmas decorations from 80 countries represented by the exposition of the national historical museum of the initiator of the exhibition collector andrey begun each building with a biography. here is the largest ball from austria at

the end of the 19th century. there are spherical paintings by shishkin and dali next to toys with a hint of faberge eggs worth several thousand euros, for those who want to feel nostalgic for gilded cones and soviet childhood. we will get acquainted in general with the history of the appearance of the first christmas decorations. from what they were made tasty they were edible. yes , why were they replaced just the same with glass ones this transition process. yes, of course touch museum exhibits. you can’t open large beautiful showcases in which you can have a good look at these museum christmas decorations. every year the collection is made by soviet toys, of course. many give as a gift. you can say so. well, of course, we are trying to bring ourselves and so long ago our collection was replenished with african toys from a country like tanzania and, probably, the brightest and most interesting of them is a glass elephant. mini-museum, open daily, and during the tour you can learn about the tradition of celebrating the new year around the world. everything changes

very quickly time passes imperceptibly minutes days of the year we never have enough time to stop and think about those who are waiting for us at this very moment it is worth remembering those without whom we will be so lonely on this earth it's time to say, you know , i miss or listen to dad right now, without delay, you need to say, i'm here, i'm around. appreciate the time you spend with your loved ones.

alexandrovna good evening. good evening. two years until the new elections in may 2022. you promised to come to belarus and you did not keep your promise. i will even say this, because your first visit to our country. oddly enough, in my entire long life , it happened to get out with her, so this is my first first trip to belarus to minsk. and for what purpose i succeeded. or even look at the syneco and all this. to a greater

extent, i managed to feel something, of course, of course, an amazing impression. yesterday. it all went so piercing and pain and gratitude in the museum great patriotic war. so this topic always touches me very deeply. that is, you know how with will your heart with tears in your eyes, when you see how, firstly, you endured a lot of the most, you took it upon yourself. the first blow of belarus to the people of belarus during the great patriotic war. what suffering did you endure? how many yes now still without the nameless hero put their lives in, and this can not leave anyone indifferent absolutely, that is, for me this is the deepest impression and yes and from people from the atmosphere, that is, if i used to, uh, you know, in belarus they are very fond of and people

love belarusians in russia, that is, as you know , it is believed that belarusians are already very calm, very hardworking people, patient , very clean, neat , many good many good words. ah, but it’s one thing to treat well in absentia all your life and you understand to love like this in absentia, and another thing is when you come to feel and you understand that it’s really with love in your heart it will say, yes, it makes me very happy, because you say belarus here many russian officials prefer to come here. uh, soviet belarus yes, and the truth already cuts the ear a little, and we perceive it a little. well , it's not clear, yes. why do you have such a definition? well, let's say. our country is very positive, i will take it so. you know, i was actually

born, born in uzbekistan that is, i have , uh, a very difficult fate for my relatives, uh from my father’s side and siberia from my mother’s side. uh, i have it in voronezh, because it's also on time there was an evacuation war in evacuation, and my grandfather and father dispossessed us. i mean his family at the time. and as you know, paradoxically, in siberia , kulakov were usually exiled. but then it turned out that they had to flee central asia, and this is the time . e, so the war is already there after the war. eh, i gave birth with and. eh, you know, people from all over the soviet union came there then. i remember ours, i was in school. out of thirty-something people in our class, there were at least twenty people of 27 different nationalities different different the most diverse, including sticks the germans were. well, everyone and belarusians, there were ukrainians and uzbeks. naturally. and there weren’t

just any tatars. and the environment in which we grew up is, firstly, respect. you have respect and a desire to understand, we went to visit each other, treated us to our national dishes there, that is, the interest in respecting another culture, other traditions, and caring attitude. you understand you can’t invade the national environment like this, but you know with a heavy boot, but you can’t, because sometimes, when you don’t understand, it seems to you that it’s normal you immediately left, and people, especially i know, this is because i worked a lot in the caucasus . . and you can offend not just a person. and you can offend people, so you have to be. this is what i've had since childhood. here it is delicate with the subtlety of respect and desire to understand, yes, but, well, what can i say? eh,

you understand? we all still have blood hanging. yes, in each of us and ukrainian belarusian and belarusian and but this is the feeling of our slavic paganism, yes, and the mentality and common history of our country is the soviet union we do not care, well, i, uh, forgive me, next year will be 70 years old. yes, that is, but we grew up, you can’t reject it, you understand, and there was a lot of good, and this is inherent in us, and er. well, apparently all this, well, shaped my character and attitudes like this, so for me. well, here, i say, absentee love and intimacy, but now she is here, i just felt her. thank you. well, uh, look at the chairmen of the cec of belarus and russia uh-huh karpenko and panfilov are communists. well, i'm so for myself.

yes, here's how you succeed and whether you managed to find a consensus, there are no problems at all, and i'll tell you. why. first, we are both in this case as heads of electoral systems. what is an electoral system in general? it already in itself predetermines something like a democratic way of forming power through elections, and uh, i will say that all these stereotypes have outlived their usefulness, everything that was formed by the communists was chosen by the same conservatives, republicans. now everything collapsed. right now, in recent years, especially when compressed time is growing, dynamism is growing in general, that is, we are entering a new historical era in general. and this ideological epoch is generally a way. i would

say that this is now a challenge for all of humanity. to be or not to be? in what coordinate system, how are we? will we be able to get out of the impasse into which we drove to the west with our own? yes will we be able to find ways for wildlife to coexist with this world, harmoniously? how will we build at all? what quality of life should be the quality of interaction with everyone. uh, well, let's say this with all the representatives. here is the creation of this being. these are the most important philosophical questions. yes, and in this case, we all will have to answer this, and but all these stereotypes are political clichés, they all collapsed, what is modern communism. take a communist, take it and today we were in the temple, yes, and uh, no matter how we say. uh, well, the soviet era. you must be an atheist, and so on and so forth

now, but this is not there, many are communists, they believing people or perceive very much. peaceful refers to religions, then i, for myself, i can’t understand this definition of a democrat, and in general, communism is a democrat of communism - this is an ideology. in my opinion, and democracy is a way of forming power, to a greater extent, a procedure, and not some kind of ideology, dema well, well, here i am, in general, non-partisan since the ninetieth year. here i am, despite all the myths did not set foot, i came to the communist party with the advent of gorbachev in 85 with faith in the variable. here with hope and yet you will say, as quickly left this party in the ninetieth year with great disappointment and already distrust, because he began to do in the ninetieth before the year before the path happened and how the path and when everyone

ran from there the year before since then. i did not join any party and my worldview. here, i would say that the idea is much more complicated than those political clichés. yes, i am a very free inner person, so i value the freedom of others. and yes, i think, well, let's say something. i am very tolerant and liberal, but on the other hand. i am still a deep patriot and i think that now, in my opinion, even take our country and how this is a dramatic situation that has developed, how society has shown it. everyone now manifests itself in a new quality, and now these all of them have collapsed with all their deeds. now you are for the country or you are for destroying it, not just against it, but on someone's side. that is why we have all of our most important political forces. don't look everyone you know turned out to be so mature. and then

there was an understanding that all of our ideological other contradictions. now they are secondary. come on, if we join forces now. let's save the country. and then, on the path of its development, when yes, we will decide these nuances, so no, i don’t see any contradictions, we have a lot in common. and now today we discussed just the main task, without imposing anything on each other, we appreciate the specifics of the national specifics of the system of each of our cultural ones, while sharing experience. we will share experience and develop what, for example, is acceptable from us, you are acceptable from you. we have here way what development. well, since you have touched, yes, the topic of democracy or liberalism. you have served as commissioner for human rights. uh, from the

fourteenth to the sixteenth year, and led. uh, there were citizenship movements. at least what i read yes were in the democratic opposition. and in general, here's the word since we have already touched on this democracy and human rights. yes, at a certain moment, you must agree, they were for the soviet people, especially such a magical light. this is how it is, this is the faith in which the new faith that they tried to impose on us, but over the past couple of years, they have discredited themselves so much that i don’t know, frankly speaking, how to relate to them and is it not time, in principle, not to introduce new definitions. that is why the vaunted western democracy does not evolve, but degrades and how true. this is the saying that democracy is dead. but for now, the people will live, and the desire for the people to form a state, a society, a

country. well, that is, the very concept of beggars, you just need it, but in the old sense it collapsed, because if a, as in themselves, those countries that have appointed themselves as a beacon and democracy, that is, the advanced ones in fact. you look there everything happened. there they turned into democratic werewolves. i would say why a is the foundation of democracy. it is, of course, the power of the people. maybe drinking a gun to be. there i will not list a whole series, but the main signs, but i will say one thing. that is, this majority forms the rule, but the rights of minorities are respected. yes, let's say this is the classical understanding of democracy. what's happening in the west now? we have a dictate of a minority and they shut up this majority or there is an imitation with it, no one

considers what kind of democracy it is. this is a perversion. you understand this perversion. eh, so what can i say? i really say? i always thought that there was more of a soviet person in me, yes, or that's when the union collapsed yes and a. we wanted change, we wanted something new. and so i remember myself. well, she was pretty young. we were, you know, not only me, and i think, lord, well, what a fool i was sometimes. yes why because we there were both naive and gullible, we really hoped that the west would be friends with us, what kind of prepared to help us? that is, we believed all the hypocrisy that fell upon us for the first time when i was appointed minister of social protection. that is the most difficult time. uh, late

1991. it was just here on january 15 november uh-huh actually. today we have 17 today. 91 so that's 31 years ago, huh? and when horror came to me, my classmates, who i am an electronics engineer, and we finish and, uh, my guys, all the scythe students worked in it in boxes in others, everyone began to close everything began to collapse. all were yesterday. they were democrats. everyone wanted change, and today they were left without anything without understanding that, and in this horror and chaos, but they became when i saw how to tell you. the new owners are those who felt like new owners, the international monetary fund, the world bank, which opened the offices of high officials with their feet. i remember they came to me as a minister and began to offer there, well, in fact,

if these are the recommendations, then this means, in fact, i divided by 10 what they said and realized that, in fact, we are on the verge of extinction. it is a closure, and there are not only mines, but high. i would say high production. well, even the tv was made by military industrialists, so that we would rivet pans, highly qualified working class personnel were exhausted, degraded and dump dirty primitive technologies from europe from there, leaving only this high intellectual it. yes, it is. it's already here, honestly. saying, i kicked out of the office and said that i, uh, i don’t have to uh anymore. it's impossible, but you said, i was in a democratic position. after all , for the first time i expressed in russia and left the government. this is precisely from a democratic

government, when i saw that such a roll, that is, a reform in the economy, does not correspond to the victims, in fact, due to the greatest social human losses, this can happen, then there is no balance, and because they did not hear me. i left the government. that is, at that time i was in the opposition just became democratic, yes the government and yeltsin and uh, let's say, well then, so i was, you know, that is, i was in different positions. i was their putin in opposition at one time. yes, we are with him for the first time the first woman who walked. yes, as a candidate for the presidency, just when he was elected for the first time, yes, yes, therefore, uh, well, i have my own understanding of justice, such a luxurious biography even seems to me, it even goes a little deeper here. yes , look, you were still a people's deputy in the soviet union yes, people's deputy yes, 89 years old.

chernomorte should be a minister if you come as a state duma deputy today? but look , then it would be, perhaps i was a minister at the same time. i was a minister there for only 2.5 years, and at that time, yes, just like a minister in kaluga, i was also elected a deputy. that is, i am in two qualities. yes, they were the commissioner for human rights. yes, just recently, you know, after i left. uh, vot resigned from the government. that is, if he were to leave voluntarily, then he would resign. i have not been an official for a long time. to me it's hard to be an official. i'm a very free person, it's hard for me. i can't just obey. i need to be convinced that if i agree, i believe in what they tell me, i should do it, so for a long time i had difficulty. well, i deliberately

thought through suffering. i must believe in it. i left and for a long time i was, well, as if in free flight, however, i was on a voluntary basis headed the councils under yeltsin. social on some issues, that is, there was an alternative, and uh, then after the elections president, when vladimir vladimirovich invited me, but it was all on a voluntary basis and for the first time. after such a long break, that is, consider this the beginning of the ninety-fourth year, when i left in the fourteenth year, that's two. how long has it been 320 years? yes, only 20 years later. i returned to the state structure. yes , an institution, since there was a unanimous proposal from both sides for me, both from human rights activists and from the president, to head this institution. it was historic for me. event, a march of the fourteenth year. in the morning he invites me to the state duma and approves me there. in what authoritative rule of

a person after dinner, i'm going to the kremlin for a historic event, when the agreement on the crimea was signed and my first trip was to the crimea since. well, uh, so many questions arose at once that i had to do this right from the spot in my career. well , look, you ran for president in 2000. yes, this topic has already been touched upon. well , let's say, so everyone would, but such hopelessness, but after all, i don't want to involve you in women's language, right? well, please, but i would like to draw an analogy. surely you followed the elections in belarus in 2020. and now it’s clear to me personally, how, as a person with such experience, well, we have listed yes, only some of the positions in which you were and how a person with such experience and knowledge can apply for the position of president well, the presidential post, but here’s how

our e a fairy to go to the polls with such a baggage of knowledge as she has, i can’t understand this, well, you see, two categorically different situations and nominations. here. alexandra, what do you think about it? i don’t want to impose my opinion, and yet it’s not about genes. you know, it’s very difficult for me to impose some kind of opinion, so i’m honored , you know, we didn’t talk about one very important consequence, in which, but i started i started a production master when all my classmates asked for it. i said no. i want to work in production, and she worked at the factory for 12 years and started as a foreman. uh, you know me, they taught us and taught at the institute, thank god not only soldering, but also welding there, uh, you understand, i would work not only with my head, but with my hands. yes, that is, i also had a workshop. i have from all at first 120

men, not very much at all. i'll tell me the girls are there , uh, a little over 20 years old. yes, it was not just that you were respected somewhere. at first, i ran the construction for them in six months. here is the character. you yourself passed, do you know from the earth? you know what heavy production is, dangerous production, you are in the midst of people, you do not come off the ground. you pass you gain quality gradually this you understand the experience of a person, it doesn’t matter what gender you are a woman a man, well, thank god we have two sexes. we do not believe in any of the 99 transgender people and will never have this without a doubt. even the quality of the personality is important. and what do you have in your soul, and what can you offer people, and what can you convince them of, and you can see people in something, if you yourself have lived it, felt it , realized it, thought it through, yes, then people can believe, but so never aspired to. in politics, i want

to tell you that i was a wonderful wife exemplary when my husband was taken to serve. i took a small child, went after him, lived in the village, stoked laundry stoves, boiled on kerosene gas in a barn. well, and so on and so on. and by the way, cutlets fried cutlets very well. i love my cutlets more, my favorite food, that is, you know, one thing never interfered with another. that is, you understand, but i always understood for me how a woman has always been more important than the priority of this family and a child a small child should be next to his mother, mother is never a nanny, no one will replace and always this was a priority, so i did not strive. i didn’t think that fate would endure this policy for me, it happened, that is, i didn’t aspire to this career. that's how it happened to the russian, that's how it happened, and in life nothing happens by chance, that's it. uh, so you have to. but this

is your destiny and your cross. yes, carry it the way you do, you know, that's how it happened. and as for the lady, and tikhonovsky just recently flashed somewhere on tv. he's so a little unkind, that for me. yes, that's probably the point. that i don't think that it was she who decided. you see, it was decided for her that it was necessary and, uh, well, her husband is sitting. well, this can somehow be such a substitute. ah, but she fell for it and now, probably, she has entered the role, but it seems to me that it’s not even worth talking about this person at all, in my opinion, well, everything was blown away there. there , in my opinion, there is no future. no matter how pumped up, that is, to be frank, this character is absolutely not interesting to me. i don't see

even the slightest political future there, therefore, can they be interesting and sufficient? alexandra elections in belarus yes, here in our country it is always not just a day of voting for a certain person. this is a choice of a further development path, and of a geopolitical vector, therefore, a favorite moment for trying color revolutions. well, of course in russia well, let's say the same thing directly. now, if nothing works out with our countries during the electoral period, yes, then why does the opposition not change tactics or, nevertheless, elections have always been and will be the most vulnerable spot for manipulation. that's your opinion, and you know the elections. but as a pretext, as a pretext, they appear in the political technological cynical strategies of western strategists. always those vulnerable revenge there through

which you can carry out color revolutions to put your own. eh, let's say dolls. well, in the sense of their followers and so on and so forth. that is , you understand these technologies, if earlier in a number of countries, when this was still happening, and they, for their part , were not ready for him, but then we learned to analyze it. we see this trend i went from there, there, and so on and so forth, so the most important thing is when you see a trend, yes, but in time to react to it in such a way, that is, work ahead of the curve so that, well, let's say, these guys' plans do not come true, therefore, i think that we e enough. i think your lessons are serious. yes, mistakes, work on mistakes has been done, lessons have been done. eh, let's say the conclusions are drawn. we also do not sit in vain and what is my appearance. uh,

as chairman of the central election commission. she also did not accidentally it happened after but a very serious conversation with the president. and since well, he and i have known each other for a long time, he knows my pros and cons, which is something of a sin, uh, i come all the time saying something unpleasant , yes, well, apparently useful and uh, yes, we immediately became . yes, you understand this, well, the experience of a politician. i was in all aspects of the legislative. here in the executive branch. i created a lot, that is, i earned money for the development of civil society. that is, he is much hypostasis, which allows me to form some kind of strategy. yes and a at the same time there is, here we are i understood. you understand that the main conclusion with what i had to see my colleagues and before the central election commission. we,

despite the fact that we have 15 people, all representatives of different parties are self-sufficient people with different views. we are unanimous here we are unanimous on the fundamental issues of development. what does that mean? this means who is the main judge for us? who are we working for? what are we working for where? what would be the light of the west or someone to please anyone? we work, the main thing is judge - this is our voter ours people and if they trust us. so the elections, if they believe the results of the elections, if they believe that the results are reliable. so, it means that we have completed our tasks and it is on this that we are working on huge mistakes at the sight. that is, what would be wrong , what needs to be changed. and we have set this task as a whole, so that trust does not grow from year to year. natural trust is real trust

hard work our hardest electoral system is very complex. i don't have vertical leverage there to force it. uh, we don't have anyone. at all of us commissions there are half of the party of different half. there, from representatives of the housing committees of the society, there, well, and so on. in various organizations of officials, according to our law, it is supposed that there was also no more than half of him, not half of the party. and with us we are with him up to 6% no more. yes, that is, we have a commission for everything, the lower the level of the precinct. this is almost under a million people, but 100,000 commission is absolutely a cross section of society. that's what kind of society such a commission. that's what you have here is your neighbor your brother? and so on, here they are all in commissions. and it was very important. you see, i

realized that the main thing is incredible patience, the ability to find compromises, reach consensus and the ability to convince. if you want to spend your laziness, it should convince you at the level of the central electoral commission - this is at the level with the regions. we still have a federal state. i just can’t appoint someone no, if they legislate, if the executive and you need to find an acceptable mountain on the chairman, who is already at their level subject. here again, different members of the commission from different parties must choose complex complex structures. and with all this democracy and complexity, as in society, the structure is the ability to draw lines. on what on the maximum openness of transparency we tell the guys on the position, what did we do? yes, do not tear

your open doors. if you want to check, go we have created all the conditions for full-fledged monitoring in any country in the world. this is not the case, the multi-stage control and surveillance system is not a single western the country of a tenth share will not withstand the control that we have in how it goes in our partners. yes, democratic yes, let's say so. here are just a few words. i do not want. uh, a very long touch. yes, but it's still 402 million americans who voted by mail out of 150 that's, well, as a professional you can estimate the scale and 8 million deprived of the right to vote a complete ban on international surveillance in 17 states and they have criminal liability. e for the approach. to the polling station at a distance of less than 200 m. yes. here i really like you, in fact, not everywhere, but there are in the states that define observations in this way. here in this situation. yes. well,

maybe it makes sense for us not to pay attention at all to all these conclusions of international osce missions, that bse yes, and in principle forget about it, like a nightmare and focus solely on domestic electorates. well, we have, of course, also allied bodies, there are the cis and observers, those who are objectively suitable, they can be invited, and let's speak frankly. why us to feed the people who without fail their imprisonment. we know 10 years ahead. yes, we will do that. do you understand that we have already begun to do this, because? you know, if i say, when i said everything, that so, lord, this is how we will be. well, i think, well, fool, naive in the early 90s. yes, but listen, now it’s okay, then we didn’t know much. yes, here i am now, well, from the height of that experience, that we have gone through these 30 years,

when everything fell into place, when i throw off all the masks , when we see the price of freedom of speech. here the symbol of freedom of speech western is dzhuliana sanych yes, when we see human rights in the form of diktat. uh, sorry uh. well, i don't know perverts. well pervert. well, the dictates of the perverts budding, yes, that is, this is an anomaly pathology, the dictator is normal, when you even have to be ashamed of this to be a normal person. i won't. when you know, when we have to be absolutely all this, or not want not to hear not to see this, in order to be continue talking about some western values. yes, in the original form how they yes and defend it, yes or you have to be just a notorious scoundrel or but i don't know either or but a reasonable person open. although honestly, who wants to see, he sees everything, in fact, what

is happening. well, since we have been at the cis level for a long time, we have developed our own standards. we offered them. would you like this, yes, that is, these are these two. er, they've been pointed out to these double standards many times. well uh, you know what to take with the organization, we even see the united nations organization take the import take all the international organizations in fact they are all here this dictate is american. well, let's say publicity. it is now more than ever manifested or will be a skill, in your opinion in our way, here we are. here's my how it is golden billion, we don't give a damn about the rest of us, now it's already seven. yes, 8 billion. here we are alone and we will be of you, like vampires, suck out your intellectual capabilities, your resources, any resources. we will live for you. and you excuse me, you are dying, you are degrading as you like, we do not need you. that is, if we take from all these beautiful words, chips, the essence, here it is exactly like that and

if it is our way, then you have a chance to be there as a half-ravak, a vassal, or we will destroy you here is an organization. and you look like all organizations. here look now play along. we do see. it makes no sense to throw pearls in front of sorry, there is no point in throwing anything; you have to proceed from the interests of your people, your national traditions of cultural history and modern challenges for ta that must be overcome in order for the country of the society of the state to develop, all this is the main thing, and here one must be very honest and strong and have the ear of the spirit. and sure he does and find common ground. most. the main thing is, instead of quarreling over trifles, unite on the main thing inside, and then decide on the nuances, so now, at least, this trend is more and more with us. it is gaining strength, and you are like that.

we have long understood that even here from our experience. yes, i talked a lot on all platforms with many international organizations in general, including human rights organizations. what i noticed, not even that to sadly he disappeared, and the incredible degradation. that's not only international institutions, but those who are used to, they know, spoiled, they once spoiled, and this led to degradation from the fact that they have little monopoly on the truth. here they come. they begin to teach they broadcast. and we, opening our mouths and widening our eyes, listen, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, you understand, and when it's gone, it comes. epiphany well, they would give us a good floor, you know, we became. here we shook ourselves off and we saw. and what is behind this ? what is really behind this? and

it turned out that they believe this truth in the last station, that is, let's paint over it with phrases. this is the human rights club with which they drove us in the right direction, but also many others. excuse me, all sorts of chips. actually. it's a way to secure a wonderful existence. all of europe has prospered for many years thanks to our energy resources. but in fact, the quality of life has been raised. well, let's try it differently now, but they don't want to admit it, what turned out to be what. yes, they forgot how to argue put aside your point of view as soon as they begin to present some claims to you. and you can’t take me with your bare hands with your experience. yes, right there, for everyone, they begin to reasonably refute all positions, what is happening? you know, i've watched it many times, they get lost, they just get lost.

because here they have a narrow-mindedness and dogmatism of thinking, which is now being rolled over, that is, look at many politicians. leader perhaps at the level of and with - and this is the european commission and so on and so forth. she taught them. argued to convince people that they right, and when they begin to present a different point of view. they are all the time belizeans and nakoms, what dissent is there, they have no answers, they get lost and that's it. something began to ban us, because this is propaganda, that's all. here is their answer to everything. i sadly observe this degradation on the one hand, and then i think, well, guys, what kind of work deserve this, i fully support it, as a tough person. i generally think that it should be set. now, if we put a red line on a red line, then it must necessarily not just be executed. you know, uh, hitting back has

to become the norm, otherwise , we'll be running away all the time. unfortunately, therefore, i cannot help touching, literally briefly, on the topic of my own, because i am very impressed with your position, therefore. here in russia they decided not to flirt with traitors. and vladimir putin made an amendment to the accepted one. in the first reading of the law, the possibility of depriving acquired citizenship. yes, i remember your words. we are proud of our men, and let the rats run with their tails between their legs. here deprivation of citizenship for those who escaped from the draft. yes , it is not provided for in the law as a separate norm, it may be necessary to introduce such norms and understand the foreigner to fill, let's say, with a more serious meaning, and not just as a message.

you know, i also thought about this for a long time, and we have such discussions going on. here is the blagosfera, and that is, people. well, it's hard, going through everything that's going on, just, that is, here are many hardliners, i understand how difficult it is for our president, because such the greatest pressure that he took, he in general, fate remained on some. yes, in order to save this russian world. this is ours, that is, the opportunity to preserve their value systems, in general, their own country. yes, but the most energetic thing is very difficult when it thickens like this and we still have this discussion going on inside. so i think you know, even in general in the character of a cast with yes, and there may be. this is what our strength is and our weakness. this is generosity. yes, yes, it’s impossible to be peaceful, the population is our brothers, ukrainians are our brothers. god forbid that the tamir population has suffered, there is no need to destroy it,

you understand, it’s kind of like that, and that’s why everything is going on like this. how does it go, right? well, let's, well, why close the borders, this is now the balts, for which the entire soviet union worked, they retained the language and so on, now they are closing and they say that europe is a privilege in the eu for us, yes, but and so on . and we openly come to the borders, the guys come to us, that is, we and what is the strength on the other side? that's where the strength lies. the fact that there is an absolute evil, without any without any moral and moral framework. we can afford everything we can openly lie. we can be honest . there, terrorist acts arrange anything, because this is the absolute evil of lack of restraint in this, both strengths and weaknesses. yes, that is, this is a philosophical question. i don't want to go deep into it. but strength is great, a respite from

strength. or are you weakening yourself? this is generosity, right? that is, absolute evil, when you go to the fullest, the framework is crushed, in the end. what are you going to win? or to what or important it's complicated the question is, but you know those measures, it’s just that we know with our own, so in everything we are specialists, all of us are specialists, in what they used to be in football in hockey then everyone became specialists in comedy, but now she is all specialists. uh-huh, but the president. i meet him all know the president he has to go between scylla and charybdis the task has been set a lot over the years. he collects the country , it was destroyed before, and he began to collect it, and he knows more, he knows more than we do, well,

let's say, like, well, let's say, but some nuances, which exactly dictate here. if so, therefore, in this case, i am not a judge and can not. i don't consider myself an expert. here in this area, but really here now, if my personal point of view, as a citizen. i understand that now when everything is manifested. and what we have in our society is also at its zenith and there is enough inside. it's like metastases launched for 30 years. i mean, uh, let's say they broke our mentality, our perception of value. it's like a cancerous tumor, if, uh, you know, there are people who, uh, who are more total position we have know who ran the most now. here are those who, under any regimes of interruption of power, were in chocolate, they received everything, and they are

the most dissatisfied. yes, this is it. yes it is clear. and uh, here i would not know, i don’t know how to say it, but here i am also thinking about it, how to pull it out. here are the metastases. yes, there is a culture. yes? now , gradually, along with this, now society has begun to react negatively immediately to pathology in art very quickly than before. before, society and authorities closed their eyes now have to respond to the activity of society. in the culture of higher science higher education in schools. here, i see that the strength of society, which has thrown itself off. for 30 years we have been stepping on the throat of our own letters. yes, we need to compromise here. yes, maybe they are right there. and when we saw everything, this is what is happening, and now you know the people, ours somehow straightened up. this is the shoulders yes, the feeling, this is one’s own dignity, national civic

dignity and such a craving for justice and it's never been like this with us, it's always been like this, but now it's a heightened feeling, and i keep telling my people all the time. to my colleagues, my dear colleagues, with each subsequent election, the demands on the part of our voters of the society for our work will increase for us and for all levels of government. if yesterday they turned a blind eye to some kind of corruption, to the disgrace of an official, there is something else now a heightened feeling now, especially when our muscles don’t close their eyes to anything, therefore, these are all things and therefore such categoricalness and without compromise, and it is understandable, and close to me our guys shed blood. excuse life for the fact that the country was, that it was, well, destroyed, as frankly they want. just recently, the senator said that russia is orthodox, so it must be destroyed. they don't hide it. why should we pretend about

these partners. they made us enemies. it means why should he smile, so i also believe that i also think that these are still great thinkers who spoke about this, they will repeat quotes with an external enemy. let's fix it faster, if but in that case, if you can handle the internal. here with betrayal with internal betrayal with internal. well, how do you say it? well, that's probably not the way it is, the fifth column. yes , but with those who are trying to destroy us from the inside. this cannot be allowed. and here i believe that yes, we must be more uncompromising and tougher. i like this approach. this is alexander, then, unfortunately, the last one is about a philosophical question. in the ussr, it was you, the granddaughter of a kulak peasant, as you yourself said, but i knew about it, right?