that, in fact, there was no scout. unfortunately. this is another fact from history in which truth and myths have completely mixed up, but the hands of the cia are long enough to recall the scandal with edward snowden, who leaked how the secret services control every breath of the americans or julian sanshu his wickelix. after all, the journalist was also primarily wanted by the cia, according to the law of the cia, in general , initially it was not supposed to conduct operational activities within the united states, but in fact after september 11th. it received practically unlimited powers up to the fact that it is possible to seize a person who is on us soil, take him out there and apply unlawful torture against him, prohibited by the us constitution, u emphasized after 9/11. under the pretext of these tractors. uh, the us has effectively repealed many of the legal restrictions on the activities of the spice that the cia's ears are sticking out and trying. in belarus, we spoke in one of the

past programs, they stick out and it seems like the allies have a loud scandal of the two thousandth wiretapping of the chancellery, the leaders of france and germany, along with the us national security agency, in particular, telephone conversations between the adviser to the german chancellor on european policy, nicholas meyer launder, and the adviser to former french president nicolas sarkozy , could have been wiretapped. german chancellor angela and merkel and a number of members of the federal government continued to be spyed on. at least since the nineties, the head of the parliamentary commission the bundestag, which is investigating the spy scandal in germany, patrick sensburg, in turn, said that the surveillance of german citizens by the anb. the united states was carried out until 2012, which contradicts the agreement? about cooperation with

the word of the cia, concluded between the special services of both countries, on its anniversary this fall, the department of 75 managed to be noted a lot, where in the world. in the last issue, we talked about the secrets of the guantanama prison. bagramma, bugraib, torture, humiliation and murder of the innocent is the most egregious and proven crime of the 21st century, for who so far have not been punished. the same generally applies to the entire content of this series of our programs about the united states, where we tried to fit only a small fraction of the unscrupulousness and greed of the white house, happily. with what baggage we approached the centennial anniversary, which in general today is the national library of belarus, the largest in the country, we are the leading scientific institution in the field of

political science, bibliography, and also the scientific coordinating center for public libraries in our country. today the library is largest information institute cultural center in the first place. er, of course, this is the largest repository of knowledge we store today with over ten and a half million different kinds of documents. these are books, newspapers, magazines, cards, posters, abstracts and dissertations, uh, and other documents in eighty languages ​​of the world today at the disposal of our users. 17 spacious reading rooms, which are equipped for the study of all types of documents due to their technical equipment, today the library does not inferior to the leading libraries of the world, and our complex of technological systems includes both scanning equipment and restoration equipment. e for publishing

activities today on the basis of the library we publish. uh, our publishing center publishes, uh, two scientific collections. we also have our own, uh, library light magazine, which is celebrating its twenty-sixth anniversary this year. and, of course, it is impossible not to talk about ours and the socio-cultural component at the base. libraries. we host over 220 events today at various levels annually, we hold more than 30 art and more than 150 book exhibitions exhibition complex. libraries. today is located on 3.500 m², which allows us to exhibit. uh, over 600 pieces of art. and today in the library. e function e, a children's room in which you can bring your child. when working with literature several times a week, we hold various activities with children and libraries. you can even celebrate a birthday with a child. here. well, of course,

us a museum. there is a book museum where you can get acquainted with the most valuable publications in which the library funds are stored. well, even today the library is probably the only institution in the country that includes and includes a sports and recreation complex. uh, this and uh, the gym. uh, square meters of modern equipment. and even the sauna, as far as the national library of documents is concerned, what is rich in the total fund of about 10.5 million documents, of course, pearls our collection is a fund of manuscripts of rare violin documents, which we have more than 90,000 items. uh the most. e, earlier the manuscript, which in the library is the discoverer of the truth of the sunnah, the arabic manuscript, which dates from the fourteenth century, the most interesting and valuable and the edition of the manuscript of belarusian origin is the secret secret

or the aristotle's gate, which dates from the end of the xv to the beginning of the xvi centuries . and we have a library, the most valuable thing we can offer is 10 editions bible and francisco of the ambulance market, which formed the basis of the belarusian book printed to me. well, we also have the first lifetime editions of the classic of belarusian literature, yanka kupal, allegedly kolas maxim godonovich and others. a printed book in your opinion, as it seems to you, there is less reading, in fact, an interesting one is lost. uh, just a paper and printed book. there are advantages and disadvantages. ah, the printed book. let's just say it evokes great emotions. it is more interesting to work with her and she contributes to a deeper information, but electronic publications. it is more compact. she has the ability, additional

work with the text, our research shows that our readers age with age. still prefer paper. this is how the national library is presented today in digital format . today, there are more digital readers like this. if their so you can, of course, the library. today. it is not only printed documents, we provide access to more than 100 databases of domestic and global manufacturers. uh, also the library produces from its own information resources. it must be said that today readers have choices as well as work with printed documents. he e has the ability to access hundreds. uh, we are looking for the titles of modern newspapers, uh scientific articles, we can get acquainted with the full texts of textbooks. e scientific publications. and this is practically legal literature. uh, all kinds of documents. with us you can find both printed and electronic format. the most current event in

world of sports for the number one game in the small gulf country built from the ground up by hard training and exciting competition. that is, it will be an uncompromising struggle, an interesting game or my career for my story. it will be a great event if we can achieve this result . source, and already from switching to such moral and volitional qualities of victory and defeat, i was glad that they still could climb appeared within themselves the strength to start all over again try, gorgeous base 16.4. yes, his manner of performing stability, they allow us to count on the highest place. watch in sports projects on the belarus 24 tv channel.

unique ecography and unusual architectural solutions the shape of our dome is very unique, it is made of two domes in the shape of a knight's helmet, interesting facts from art experts. a similar iconography depicts the blessed virgin mary who gently presses. baby, and he hugging her mother's neck. and, of course, in this touching tenderness, there are also tragic notes of the help of god's word and the healing power of prayer,

looking at the visible holy image with bodily eyes. we ascend to the heavenly world with spiritual eyes, often through holy icons, god gives people his help, routes through prayerful and holy places in belarus and novogrudok and regions. and all this gives us the opportunity to turn again to our history. basically, we can't now, as a people, so it's great that we return to the origins of our nation, watch spiritual and educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel.

alexandrovna good evening. good evening. two years before the new elections in may 2022. you promised to come to belarus and you did not keep your promise. i will even say this, because your first visit to our country. oddly enough, in my entire long life , it happened to get out with her, so this is my first first trip in belarus to minsk. and what is the purpose and did i manage to see it all today. i am more managed to feel something, of course, of course, a terrific impression. yesterday. it all went through such a piercing pain and gratitude in the museum of the great patriotic war. so this topic always touches me very deeply. that is, you know how with

pain in your heart and with tears in your eyes when you see. as in the first place, the people of belarus withstood the first blow of belarus during the great patriotic war. what suffering did you endure? how much is still the nameless heroes laid down their lives, and this can not leave anyone completely indifferent, that is, for me this is still the deepest impression and from the people of this atmosphere, that is, if i used to, uh, you know, we, well, in belarus are very fond of and on belarusian hands us russia that is, as you know, it is believed that now that he is belarusian there is a very hardworking people of the church. you are very clean tidy many good many good good words. a, but one thing all my life in absentia is good to treat and understand love. that’s how it is in absentia, but it’s another

thing when you come to feel you understand that it ’s really with love. in your heart, you’ll say, yes, it makes me very happy, because you say belarus. many russian officials prefer to come here. uh, soviet belorussia yes, and the truth is already hurting the ears a little, and we perceive it somewhat. well, it's so ambiguous. yes. why do you have such a definition? well, let's say. our country is very positive, i will take it so. you know i was actually born, born in uzbekistan that is, i have, uh, a very difficult fate for my relatives, uh, on the side of my father siberia on the side of my mother. uh, i have it in voronezh, because it was also during the war that you had an evacuation, and my grandfather and father were dispossessed of us.

i mean his family at the time. and as you know, paradoxically, the kulakov were usually exiled in themselves. but then it turned out that they had to flee the middle azize. and this time is such a war, and there is already a time after the war. uh, i was born and uh, you know, then you know there from all over the soviet union people came. i remember ours, i was in school. out of 30-something people in the class, we had at least 20-27 nationalities, different different different very diverse ones, including a spoonful of germans. well, everyone and belarusians, there were ukrainians and uzbeks. naturally. and not the tatars, who just weren't there. and the environment in which we grew up is, firstly, respect. here is respect and a desire to understand, we went to visit each other and treated us to our national dishes there, that is, the interest in respecting another culture and other traditions is careful

relation. you understand you can not invade the national environment like that. uh, you know, with a heavy boot, but you can’t, because sometimes, when you do n’t understand, it seems to you that it’s normal to drop this phrase, but people, especially i know it, because i worked a lot in the caucasus but this is what i had in my childhood laid down. there are some nuances that you think are nothing special. or maybe she sees not just a person. and you can offend naruto, so you have to be. this is what i have had since childhood, this decadence, the subtlety of investment and the desire to understand yes, but, well, what can i say? uh, you see, in ours everyone still has blood mixed in. yes, in each of us and ukrainian belarusian and narrow russian and but this is the feeling of our and slavic paganism, yes, and the mentality and common history of our country is the soviet

union we do not care, well, i, uh, well, forgive me, next year will be 70 years old. yes, that is, but we grew up, you can’t reject it , you understand, and there were a lot of good things, and we have it laid down, and er. well, apparently all this, well, shaped my character and attitudes, so for me. well, here, i say, absentee love and intimacy, and now here it is, i just felt, thank you. well, uh, look, the chairmen of the cec of belarus and russia, well, karpenko and panfilov are communists, apparently, it seems, well, i’m like that for myself. yes, that's how you manage and did you manage to find the end there are no problems at all and i'll tell you why. first, both of us. in this case, who are the heads of electoral systems? what is an electoral

system in general? it already in itself predetermines what it is a democratic way of forming power through elections and uh, i'll say this, all these stereotypes have outlived their usefulness, everything that was formed communists, liberals, zymocrats, conservatives, republicans, now everything has collapsed. right now, in recent years, especially when a compressed time is growing, dynamism is growing, that is, such in general, that is, we are moving into a new and in general historical era. and this ideological epoch is generally a way. i would say that this is now a challenge for all of humanity. to be or not to be? in what coordinate system, how are we? can we we get out of the impasse into which we drove to the west with our own? yes will we be able to find ways to coexist with wildlife, sit down, peacefully,

harmoniously, how will we build at all? what quality of life should be the quality of interaction with everyone. uh, well, let's say this with all the representatives. here is the creation of this being. these are the most important philosophical questions. yes, and in this case, we all will have to answer this, and but all these stereotypes are political clichés, they all collapsed, what is modern communism. take communist, take and today we were in the temple, yes, and uh, no matter how we say. uh, well, the soviet era. you should be an atheist, and so on and so forth now, but this is not the case, many are communists, they are believers or they perceive it very much. peaceful refers to religions, then i, for myself, i can’t understand this definition of a democrat, and in general, communists are a democrat communism is an ideology. in my opinion, democracy is a way of forming

power, to a greater extent, a procedure, and not some kind of gem ideology. well, what, here i am in general with nineties non-partisan. here i am, despite all the myths did not set foot, i came to the communist party with the advent of gorbachev in 85 with faith in the variable. let's hopefully say how quickly he left this party in the ninetieth year with great disappointment and already distrust, because he began to do in the ninth to a year before the path was made and how the path and when everyone ran from there a year before this ever since. i did not join any party and my worldview. here, i would say the idea is much more complicated than those than those political clichés. yes, i am a very free inner person, so i value the freedom of others. and yes, i think, well, let's say something.

i am very tolerant and liberal, but on the other hand i am a deeply patriotic and believe that right now in my mind. even if we take our country, and how this is a dramatic situation that has developed, how society has shown it. everyone now manifests itself in a new quality, and now these all of them have collapsed all these lags. are we now for the country or are you for destroying it, not just against, and on someone's side that is why we have all our most important political forces. don't look everyone you know turned out to be so mature. and then there was an understanding that all our ideological contradictions are different. now they are secondary. come on, if we join forces now. let's save the country. and then, on the path of its development, when yes, we will

decide these nuances, so no, i don’t see any contradictions, we have a lot in common. and now we discussed today and just the main task, not imposing nothing on each other, we appreciate the specifics of the national specifics of the system, each with its own or somehow really cultural, while sharing experience. we will share experience and develop what, for example, is acceptable from us, you are acceptable from you . what kind of development do we have here? well , since you have already touched on, yes, the topic of democracy or liberalism. you have served as commissioner for human rights. uh, from the fourteenth to the sixteenth year, and led. uh, there were citizenship movements. at least what i read yes, they were in the democratic opposition. and in general, here's the word since we have already touched on this democracy and human rights. yes, at a certain moment, you must agree

, they were for the soviet people, especially such a magical light. this is how it is, this is the faith into which the new faith, which they tried to impose on us, but over the past couple of years, they have discredited themselves so much that i don’t know, frankly speaking, how to relate to them and isn’t it time, in principle, not introduce new definitions. that's why the vaunted western democracy doesn't evolve degrades and how true. this is the saying that democracy is dead. but for now, the people will live, and the desire for the people to form a state, a society, a country. well, that is, the very concept of beggars, you just need it, but in the old sense it collapsed, because if and how about those countries that have appointed themselves light than winter dyes, that is, this is actually advanced. you look there

everything happened. there they turned into democratic werewolves. i would say why a is the foundation of democracy. it is, of course, the power of the people. maybe drinking a gun to be. there , i will not list a whole series, but the main signs, but i will say one thing. that is, this majority forms the rule, but the rights of minorities are respected. yes, let's say this is the classical understanding of democracy. and what happened in the west now is the dictatorship of the minority and they shut up this majority, or there is an imitation with it, no one considers what kind of democracy it is. this is a perversion. you understand this perversion. eh, so what can i say? and i really do. say i always i thought that there was more of a soviet person in me, or that's when the union collapsed yes and a. we

wanted change, we wanted something new. and so i remember myself. well, she was pretty young. we were, you know, not only me, and i think, lord, well, what a fool i was sometimes. yes, why, because we were both naive and gullible, we really hoped that the west would be friends with us, that the west was ready to help us, that is, we believed all the hypocrisy that fell upon us for the first time when i was appointed minister of social protection. that is the most difficult time. uh, late 1991. it was just here on january 15 november uh-huh actually today we have. 91 means it's 31 years ago, huh? and when my classmates, who i am an electronics engineer, came to me in horror,

and ended up with them and, uh, my guys, all the co-student students worked in it in boxes in others, everyone began to close everything began to collapse. all were yesterday. they were democrats. everyone wanted a change, and today they were left without anything without understanding that, and in this horror and chaos, but they became when i saw how to tell you. the new owners are those who felt like new owners, the international monetary fund, the world bank, which opened the offices of high officials with their feet. i remember that they came to me as a minister and began to offer there, well, in fact, if these are the recommendations, then this means in fact. i've divided by 10 what they said, i realized that, in fact, for extinction to close, and there are not only mines, but high. i would say high production. well, even

the tv was made by military industrialists, so that we pans were riveted by highly qualified working class personnel were degraded and thrown out of europe from there dirty primitive technologies, leaving only this high intellectual it. yes, it's already, to be honest, i kicked out of the office and said that i uh, i uh don't come anymore. it's impossible, but you said, i was in a democratic position. after all, for the first time i expressed in russia and left the government. this is precisely from a democratic government, when i saw that kren is like this, that is, the reform in the economy does not correlate with the victims, in fact, at the expense of the greatest social human losses, this can happen, then there is no balance, and because they did not hear me. i left the

government. that is, at that time i was in opposition, it just became democratic, yes, to the government and to yeltsin, and, well, then, so you know, that is, i was in a different position. i was their putin in opposition at one time. yes, we are with him for the first time the first woman who walked. yes, as a presidential candidate, as the time he was elected for the first time, yes, yes, that's why, uh, well, i have my own understanding of justice, such a luxurious biography, because i want to go even a little deeper here. yes, look, you were still a people's deputy in the soviet union yes, the people were a deputy yes, 89 years old. minister of blackness, when you come to the state duma deputy. but look, then it would be, perhaps i was a minister at the same time. i was a minister there for only 2.5 years, and at that

time, yes, just like a minister in kaluga, i was also elected a deputy. that is, i was still in two qualities human rights ombudsman. yes, just recently, you know, after i left. uh, vot resigned from the government. that is, he would voluntarily leave, that is, resign. i have not been an official for a long time. it's hard for me to be an official. i'm a very free person, it's hard for me. i can't just obey. i need to be convinced that if i here i agree, i believe in what they tell me i should do it, so i vote for a long time, it should be. well, given quickly. consciously thought. i owe it to believe. i left and i was there for a long time. well, as a free police, it’s true, i generally headed the councils under yeltsin on a voluntary basis. special on some issues, that is, there was an alternative, and then, after the presidential elections, when vladimir vladimirovich invited me. well, it was all on a

voluntary basis and for the first time. after such a long break, that is, consider this the beginning of the ninety-fourth year, when i left in the fourteenth year, that's two. how many years have passed 320 years? yes, just 20 years later. i returned to state structure. yes, an institution, since there was a unanimous proposal from both sides for me, both from human rights activists and from the president, to head this institution. it was a historic event for me, and march of the fourteenth year. in the morning he invites me to the state duma and approves me there. in what plenipotentiary human right after lunch, i'm going to the kremlin for a historic event, when the agreement on the crimea was signed and my first trip was to crimea since. well, uh, so many right away, questions arose that i had to do this right from the spot in my career. well

, look, you ran for hell in the 2000th , yes, since you have already touched on this topic. well, let's say that everyone would, but such hopelessness, well, all the same, and i don't want to involve you in the female language, right? well, please, but i would like to draw an analogy. surely you followed the elections in belarus in 2020. and for me personally, it’s clear, as a person with such experience, well, we have listed yes, only some positions, on whom you were and how a person with such experience and knowledge can apply for the position of president for the presidential post. categorically different situations and candidates. here. alexander still, what do you think about it? i don't want to impose my opinion, and

yet it's not about the genes. you know, it’s very difficult for me to impose some kind of opinion, so you know, we didn’t talk about one very important consequences, in which, but i was starting i was starting a master at production when all my classmates asked for it. i said no. i want to work in production, and she worked at the factory for 12 years and started as a foreman. uh, you know me, they taught us at the institute, thank god not only soldering, but also welding there, uh, you understand, i would work not only with my head, but with my hands. yes, that is, i also had a workshop from everyone and at first 120 men. very much i'll say no, the girls are there, uh, a little over 20 years old. yes, it was not just that you were respected somewhere. at first, i ran the construction for them in six months. here is the character. you yourself passed, do you know from the ground? you know what heavy production is, dangerous production, you are in

the midst of people, you do not come off the ground. you pass, you gain quality gradually, this experience, a person understands, it doesn’t matter what gender you are, a woman, a man, well, thank god we have two sexes. we are in none of the 99 transgender people of disbelief. we will never have this without a doubt. even the quality of the personality is important. what's in your soul is, and what can you offer people, and what can you convince them of, and in something you can see people, if you yourself lived it, felt it , realized it, thought it through, yes, then people can believe, and therefore never aspired. in politics, i want to tell you that i was a wonderful exemplary wife when my husband was taken to serve. i took a small child, went after him, lived in the village, stoked laundry stoves, boiled on kerosene gas in a shed. well, and so on and so on. and by the way, cutlets fried cutlets very well. i like more

cutlets are my favorite food. that is, you know, yes, but it never bothered another. that is, you understand, but i always understood for me how the priority has always been more important for a woman - this is a family and a child, a small child should be next to her mother, mother will never be a nanny, no one will replace and it has always been a priority, so i did not strive. i didn’t think that fate would endure this policy for me, it happened, that is, i didn’t aspire to this career. that's how it happened, that 's how it happened, and nothing ever happens in life. by chance, that's it. uh, so you have to. but this is your destiny and your cross. yes, carry it the way you do, you know, that's how it happened. and as for the madam, tikhonovskaya will recently receive somewhere on tv. well, he's so a little mellow, that for me. yes, probably, the fact is

that i do not think that it is she who decides is understood. it was for her that they decided that it was necessary and, uh. well, the husband is sitting. well, this can somehow be such a substitute. ah, but she fell for it and now she probably got into the role, but it seems to me that it's not even worth the attention of talking about this person, in my opinion, well, everything was blown away there. here , in my opinion, there is no future, no matter how pumped up, that is, to be honest, this character is absolutely not interesting to me. i don’t see even the slightest political future there, so can they be bigger, nevertheless interesting, but enough alexander elections in belarus yes, here it’s always not just a day of voting for a certain person. this is a choice of further development path, well, geopolitical

vector, so a favorite moment for trying color revolutions. well, of course in russia well, let's say the same thing directly. so, if nothing works out with our countries during the electoral period, yes, then why does the opposition not change tactics or, after all, elections have always been and will be the most vulnerable place for manipulation. that 's your opinion, and you know the elections. but as a pretext, as a pretext, they appear in the polytechnological cynical strategies of western strategists. always those vulnerable revenge there through which you can carry out colored revolutions to put their own. eh, let's say dolls. well, in the sense of their followers and so on and so forth. that is, you understand these technologies, if earlier in a number of countries, when this was still happening, and we, for our part, were not ready, but then we learned how

to analyze it. we see this trend that went from there, there there, and so on and so forth, so the most important thing when you see a trend, yes, and react to it in time, that is, work ahead of the curve so that, let's say, the plans of these guys do not come true, so i think we e pretty. i think that your lessons are serious. yes, mistakes, work on mistakes has been done, lessons have been done. eh, let's say the conclusions drawn. we also do not sit in vain and what is my appearance. uh, as chairman of the central election commission. they are not random either. this happened after a very serious conversation with the president. and since well, he and i have known each other for a long time , he knows my pros and cons, which is something of a sin lurking. uh, i come all the time saying something unpleasant, yes, well, apparently useful and uh, yes

here we are right away. yes, you understand this, well, the experience of a politician. i was in all guises legislatively for the executive branch. i created a lot, that is, i earned money for the development of civil society. that is, i have many incarnations that allow me to form some kind of strategy . yes, and at the same time, that is, here we are, i understand. you understand that the main conclusion with what i had to see my colleagues and before the central election commission. we, despite the fact that we have 15 people, all representatives different parties are self-sufficient people with different views. we are unanimous here we are unanimous on the fundamental issues of development. what does that mean? this means who is the main judge for us? who are we working for? what are we working for where? whatever

light there of the west or someone to whom we will wait for anyone. we work, the main judge - this is our selectively our people and if they trust us. so the elections, if they believe in the results of the elections, if they believe that the results are reliable? so, it means that we have fulfilled our tasks and it is on this here we are working on huge mistakes. that is, what was wrong, what needs to be changed. and we have set this task as a whole, so that trust does not grow from year to year. natural confidence is real confidence hard work is the hardest our electoral system is very complex. i don't have vertical leverage there to force it. uh, we don't have anyone. all our commissions there consist of half different parties. there with representatives of the housing committees of the society, there, well, and so on.

e different organizations of officials according to the law we have it is assumed that there were also no more than half of him, not half of the party. and with us we are with them up to 6% no more. yes, that is, we have a commission of all than they are at the same level as a precinct. this is almost under a million people , but 100,000 commission is absolutely a cross section of society. that's what kind of society such commissions are. that's what you have here is your neighbor your brother? and so on, here they are all in the commission. and it was very important. you see, i realized that the main thing is incredible patience, the ability to find compromises, reach consensus and the ability to convince. if you are if you want to spend your laziness, this should convince you at the level of the central electoral commission - this is at the level with the regions. we still have a federal state. i just can't

appoint someone. no, if they legislate their own power, if they have an executive power, and it is necessary to find an acceptable mountain on the chairman, who is already at their level as a subject. here again, different members of the commission from different parties must choose complex complex structures. and with all this democracy and complexity, as a society structure the ability to draw a line. on what on the maximum openness of transparency we say you guys are the opposition, what did we do? yes, do not tear your open doors. if you want to check, go we have created all the conditions for full-fledged monitoring in any country in the world. this is not the case, a multi-stage system of control and surveillance, not a single western country of a tenth share can withstand the control that we have in how it goes in our

partners. yes, democratic yes, let's say so. well , just a few words. i do not want. uh, very long touch. yes, but it's still 402 million americans who voted by mail out of 150. come on, as a professional you can estimate the scale and 8 million deprived of the right to vote a complete ban on international surveillance in 17 states and they have criminal liability. e for the approach. closer than 200 meters to the polling station. yes. here i really like you, in fact, not everywhere, but there are in the states that define observations in this way. here in this situation. yes. uh, maybe it makes sense for us not to pay at all attention to all these conclusions of the international missions of the obse deep, that the bse yes, and in principle forget about it, like a nightmare and focus solely on the domestic electorate. well, we

have, of course, also allied bodies, there are the cis and observers, those who are objectively suitable, they can be invited, and let's speak frankly. why should we feed the people who mandatory their imprisonment. we know 10 years ahead. yes, we will do it, you see, we have already begun to do it, because. here you know if here i am i say when i said that the lord is so, well, naive fool. naive yes, listen, now it's okay, then we didn't know much. yes, here i am now, well, from the height of that experience, that we have gone through these 30 years, when everything fell into place, when i throw off all the masks, when we see the price of freedom of speech. here is the symbol of freedom of speech. the western one is julianna sanysh. yes, when we see human rights in the form of diktat. uh, sorry uh. well, i don't know perverts. well pervert. well, the dictates of perverts in

part, yes, that is, these are anomalies pathology, the dictator is normal, when you even have to be embarrassed to be a normal person. this. i will never let you know, when we already see all this, one must be absolutely or not want not to hear not to see this in order to continue to talk about some western values. yes, in the original form, as they are yes, and defend it, yes or you just have to be taken away. a lazy bastard or but i don't know or hmm or or but a reasonable person open, by the way, honest, who wants to see. he sees everything, in fact, what is happening. well, we, since we have long been at the level of the cis, we have developed our own standard. we offered them to you , yes, that is, these two. er, they've been pointed out to these double standards many times. well uh, you understand what to take with the organization, we even see the united nations organization take the import take all

the international organizations in fact they are all american dictates. well, let's say publicists. he is now more than ever manifested or will be new in your opinion in ours. here we are. here is the music, as it is the golden billion, we don't give a damn about us everyone else is now seven. yes, 8 billion. here we are alone and we will be of you, like vampires, to suck out your intellectual capabilities, your resources, any resources. we will live for you. and you excuse me, you are dying, you are degrading as you like, we do not need you. that is, if you take the essence of all these beautiful words and chips. here it is exactly like that, and if it is our way, then you have a chance to be there as a half-human vassal, it will be hmm or you will be destroyed. here is an organization and see how all organizations are. here, look are playing along now. we do see. it makes no sense to throw pearls in front of sorry, there is no point in

throwing anything; you have to proceed from the interests of your people, your national traditions , cultural history and modern challenges for the one that needs to be overcome in order for the country of the society of the state to develop, all this is the main thing, and here you have to be very honest and strong have fortitude. and sure he does and find common ground. most. the main thing, instead of quarreling over trifles, unite inside on the main thing, and then already solve the nuances, so now, at least, this trend is more and more with us. e, it is gaining momentum. and you are working on it. we have long understood that even here from our experience. yes, i did a lot, well, i communicated on all platforms with many international organizations in general, including human rights organizations. what i noticed, not even that he was sad from sadness, but an incredible

degradation. here are not only international institutions, but those who are used to, you know, they got spoiled, they once got spoiled and this led to to degradation from the fact that they have a monopoly on the truth. here they come. they begin to teach they broadcast. and we, opening our mouths and widening our eyes, listen, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, you understand, and when it's gone, it comes. epiphany well, they would give us a good floor, you know, we became. here we shook ourselves off and we saw. and what is behind this ? what is really behind this? and it turned out that they believed this truth at the last station, that is, let's paint over it with phrases. this is the human rights baton with which they drove us in the right direction, but many others, these excuse all sorts of chips actually. this is a way to

ensure a wonderful existence. all of europe has prospered for many years thanks to our energy resources. but as a matter of fact, the quality of life has been raised. well, let's try it differently now, but they don't want to admit it, what turned out to be. yes, they have forgotten how to reasonably put aside their point of view, as soon as they begin to present some claims to you. and you can’t take me with your bare hands with your experience. yes, immediately they start to reasonedly, uh, refute them the position of what is happening, you know, i have watched it many times, it is lost, they are simply lost. because here they have a limited and dogmatic thinking, which now prevails, that is, look at many politicians as a leader at the level of the eu, and this is the european commission, and so on and so forth. she taught them. it is reasonable to convince people

that they are right, and when you begin to present a different point of view to them. they are all the time belizeans and nakoms, what dissent is there, they have no answers, they get lost and that's it. you start it us ban because it's propaganda, that's all. here is their answer to everything. i sadly observe this degradation on the one hand, and then , well, guys, what kind of work deserve this, i fully support it, as a tough person. i generally think that it should be set. now, if we put a red line on a red line, then it must necessarily not be simply fulfilled. you know, uh, hitting back has to become the norm, otherwise , we're going to run away all the time. unfortunately, therefore, i cannot help touching, literally briefly the topic of my own, because i am very impressed with your position, therefore. here in russia