zelensky the most difficult energy situation in kiev and the region, as well as the vinnya sunskaya ternopil, cherkasy and odessa regions, and the management of the energy company tek urged citizens to leave the country altogether in order to reduce the load on the energy system. new information from my colleagues at 15:00 on our air. all the best. the sass program is authorized to declare i am the host nadezhda sas greetings, let me remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes events people will affect the life of everyone and the life of the country, and the main events of world politics. i 'll tell you right now donald trump officially

announced his intention to run for president of the united states in 2024 trump said that the country is now in decline, and china is rapidly moving forward and his return to the post of head of state will make america great again, few people doubted it anyway in his plans, but trump was quick to make a statement in light of the talk that the current governor of florida, rondesantis, could have a better chance of taking the white house, now the rest of the potential republican candidates. will have to reckon with the fact that there is still the most popular politician in the environment. conservatives are already in the game on the sidelines of the east asian summit, the first personal meeting between us president joe biden and the chinese president took place, the parties did not hide the fact that they consider each other strategic rivals, but at the same time they strive to avoid steps that would lead to a direct military clash within a year,

americans have repeatedly tested beijing's patience in issues of taiwan, and now, apparently, they decided to take a step towards detente. however, none of the observers. there is no doubt that the transition confrontation between the us and china is only a matter of time. on november 15, a missile from the ukrainian s-300 air defense system fell on the territory of poland, killing two farmers at first kiev and a number of its eastern european allies were quick to lay the blame on the russian armed forces, which on that day carried out an unprecedented-scale missile attack on infrastructure facilities in many regions of ukraine including border areas poland, but the americans this time did not allow the incident to be used to escalate the already extremely tense relations between nato and russia. washington, through various channels, quickly made it clear that it was an incorrect operation of the ukrainian air defense, and not

a more deliberate russian strike. well, the topic of today's program is the grain deal, who is guilty of global famine, the legendary american diplomat henry kissinger once remarked while controlling oil. you control the state but controlling food. you control entire nations humanity has reached the 8 billion mark and in a world where so many people food is the number one resource there is a fight worse than any other rivalry about how daily bread has become a driving force in world politics and why it is not enough for everyone and will be discussed in the program and i am glad to welcome inna aleksandrovna vetrenko already present in our studio, doctor of political sciences, professor of the russian federation hello and vadim borovik political scientist. thank you very much for being with us today. in addition, i would like to connect political expert from ukraine

oleksandr lazarev to our air. good evening oleksandr hello nadezhda and the audience. glad to see you. traditionally, we start our discussion program with a blitz question of hunger, how it was in the past has become a weapon again. vadim please listen, he never stopped being one, if, uh, in the nineteenth year, uh, there were 150 million more hungry people, and last year by 46 million. only less, more precisely by e, 146 million, there were fewer cases. yes, now at 46 today 828 million, starving all over the world is not a weapon. this way of existence is impossible, but to distribute god in such a way that a certain part that inhabited the planet had a sufficient standard of living and at the same time. uh, the rest of the population had a comparability with them, therefore, it is necessary to

take control of some regions, agricultural land alexander, please give you the word dear. well, regarding hunger, i agree with my colleague, indeed. about a billion people in the world are now starving, this un statistic, but can it be distributed? i think that it is simply necessary to abandon certain basic concepts and models of the redistribution of public goods under the capitalist system, when well, five percent of the world's world community, yes, controls almost all resources in particular. this is very well expressed precisely in the western corporatocracy, when there is a transnational corporation of the type, there is a kargil mansant, it enters the markets, completely absorbs these markets from and takes under the control of entire peoples and states, then what you, in fact, said started broadcasting quoted about this in detail. i am sorry. we have a quick question, so we answer succinctly whether the world is facing a large-scale famine or is it still

an exaggeration. what do you think, despite the fact that those who gave rise to global studies and as a phenomenon, the united states of america, within the framework of their election campaigns, disavow this topic of the global problem of our time, no one has canceled hunger. she was always first positions is valid in conditions where there is no system of world order, and where non- nation-states are the authors. and as colleagues correctly say, not government organizations are transnational companies that concentrate the main resources in their hands to distribute the right supply and consumption the right supply. eh, everyone, uh, in need, but there is no such possibility, so here you need to create a system of world order, accept the same rules of the game and put things in order. ukraine and russia are among the key agricultural producers and not surprisingly, the conflict between them quickly became part of a global battle for food control

, both sides accusing each other of provoking famine in poor countries. so and contrary to militant rhetoric. still, they reach compromises. the main one was the grain deal about what kind of agreement it is and what its complexity is. see our story on july 22 russia ukraine turkey and he signed an agreement that many call a grain deal. she assumed the creation of sea corridors for the safe export of grain, sunflower oil and fertilizers from three ports of ukraine, first of all, the agreement was of a humanitarian nature in many countries famine erupted against the backdrop of a sharp rise in food prices, africa, asia and latin america were especially hard hit however, at the end of october, russia had to to suspend participation in the agreement for security reasons, the ships of the black sea fleet were attacked by drones in the sevastopol bay, the russian military succeeded

repel the attack by destroying 16 drones, however, 218 ships that participated in the grain deal were blocked by these drones and uh, underwater and aerial drones. they partially walked in the corridor along which grain is exported from ukraine, and thus they created a threat to our ships, which should ensure the safety of the withdrawal of grain, and to civilian ships that are involved in this. and we committed ourselves. provide this security, but if you excuse me for the simplicity of expression, if ukraine dolbanet under these courts will be guilty. we are 4 days later. russia resumed its participation. before that, moscow put forward a number of conditions, kiev gave written guarantees not to use the grain corridor for military purposes. and there is a promise to quickly persuade western countries not to interfere with russian agricultural exports, that is, russian grain and fertilizer

will be exported in the same volumes as ukrainian raw materials the us and the eu continue to obstruct fertilizers and agricultural products on world markets. we will take this into account when considering questions about the appropriateness of extending the grain deal an important role. in this whole process, the president of turkey played a rejeper. it was under his leadership. turkey has practically become the main beneficiary of the grain agreement, both in the economic sense, it is the purchase of cheap grain from ukraine, and in the political sense, turkey, led by erdo. we became the organizer of the peace process , it is worth noting that third world countries do not receive even ten percent of wheat supplies. the lion's share of exports from ukraine falls on ankara and the european union, african and middle eastern countries get less than five to seven percent. instead of wheat. ukraine began to export more expensive raw materials, corn, barley and sunflower oil; turkey,

spain, the netherlands, china and egypt became the beneficiaries of exports, while ports and sea routes were used to supply weapons to ukraine, therefore, the export of ukrainian grain. it should not be viewed from the economic side. and from the geopolitical one a month before the grain deal. this was also noted by alexander lukashenko, well, we cracked down quickly. putin and i discussed this problem. i say, don't worry there is no grain there as much as they scream and it's not about the grain. they want to accuse us with you that we have created a world famine. we are such giants, what made a famine in the world began to understand? they just had to hang some other world-class problem on us and africans and asians to say, it's him. they are two dictators together. he does what well, i'm glad to welcome leonid slutsky leader in our program faction of the liberal democratic party of the chairman of the committee on

international affairs of the state duma of the federal assembly of the russian federation good evening. to greet. and i know that you are an experienced and resolute politician, so i will ask you a question. perhaps even in some ways the toughest grain deal is most actively criticized by those who are as tough as possible in relation to the west towards ukraine against any compromises, speaking relatively speaking, voters in your party, if possible, and so to speak, and in their system of coordinates the very existence of the grain deal - it already looks like as the defeat of the russian federation as a certain deflection in relation to the west tell me, please, because it appeared even in the lexicon, and such a phrase, a notorious political contract. incidentally, i am

absolutely critical of this. but still, why is this a deal, including beneficial to the russian federation? let's not. uh, hope to make a mess someone criticizes. this is their business in our e, the party of sound people. we have a constructive opposition party. we must forget, and the final recipient. eh this grain is another thing when by the grain corridor is hit by unmanned aerial vehicles when missile attacks are somehow planned along the grain corridor. we had this information, of course. this grain corridor was closed. it threatened the ships. and it threatened the security of the people, as far as the grain deal should go. it's not, uh, a situation that, uh,

should balance our uh. today we see destructive interaction with kiev on these issues. we will decide or on the fields of a special military operations or in negotiations, when kiev agrees to them again. you remember that i am one of those four negotiators appointed by the president of russia from our side, which took part in negotiations with kiev for quite a long time, but then the ukrainian side, uh, stepped back from all the agreements reached. therefore, we do not need our relations today extremely, destructive, aggravated with the nazi regime in kiev , to balance in order to stop grain supplies to those countries that are really in need them, which are ours. and

the population that we need to support as healthy people in every possible way, so the grain deal will continue, yes, hope, thank you very much, but i would like to clarify more. what is the impact of western sanctions against russian and belarusian fertilizers on the intensification of the global food crisis. it is no secret that the availability of fertilizers to overcome hunger is always higher. than the availability of supplies. just grains from the same ukraine or the russian federation, it's like the famous parable that it is wise to give a person not just a few fish, but a fishing rod. we, uh, need to combine both the fishing rod and the fishes of sanctions and restrictions, the number of which simply rolls over. eh, absolutely. e does not fit with any sane approach. some time ago, uh, of course,

until february of this year. as a member of our delegation to the general assembly, i addressed the russian delegation by general secretary antonio guttasha to the sound politicians in the world. e. i received more than 60 responses from country leaders the same guttaish, and that sanctions should generally be sincere from today's realities. this is a rudiment of atavism archaism. eh, in today's world politics, this is not to be, we must build a balanced world architecture. me, of course, theoretically similar to uh, can be taken solely by decision of the security councils of the united nations, we see the realities are completely different more than 10,000 sanctions are visible today, then against russia against belarus there are also enough of them, including uh against a company that operates in the field of, uh,

the production and export of mineral fertilizers, however , everything related to e. hmm importing mineral fertilizers to, uh, the countries that need it. we uh, have, uh, supply opportunities, and in this case, of course, because of the sanctions. here, uh, the mechanics are broken, this is so and there is no need to hush it up, but let's have a fishing rod and a fish. let's give to those who need it. i would like to ask one last question about your relationship. how do you assess the overall role of turkey not only in grain? but also in an attempt to find a way to resolve the conflict in ukraine as a whole know turkey despite the fact that we sometimes sparks somewhere in the international, excuse me, bilateral relations. uh has been and will remain our closest partner in terms of assistance to turkey and

his personal experience of this president of turkey in e. not easy. uh, dossier of negotiations with ukraine. do you remember that one of the rounds of negotiations took place in istanbul and erdogan even delayed flying a few hours later to uzbekistan in order for this round personally open. it seems to me that here it is necessary to say that the turkish side, e, tried to do everything possible so that, with the mediation of ankara, moscow and kiev would find a common language faster and to a greater extent. how much did it succeed? it's a matter of diction. this is a question for kyu. yes , i absolutely agree with you. thank you very much, let 's hope so, thank you leonid eduardovich for participating in the program. well, what are we moving on? next, i would like us to pay attention to our plasma, this is exactly what the

istanbul grain corridor looks like, and the extension of work which they have agreed. i would like to draw your attention to the fact that the united nations organizations remained the guarantees for the implementation of the initiative, and turkey , naturally, ukraine turned to, uh, partners within the framework of the initiative with a proposal to extend its minimum. for a year, including the port of nikolaev in it, because at the moment it has been extended for 120 days in one. what do you think, will the russian federation support this initiative? this is a purely speculative question, no one is their fate worries all the sellers. its interests in this region, of course, the position of the russian federation is more sensible, because there are sanctions and logistical restrictions. they lead to shortages and rise in prices, but turkey strengthens its influence in the region, receives cheap russian grain and creates

it for itself. uh, energy hubs get energy cheaply. the european union is stuffing itself for feed at the expense of this deal and is trying to prevent it. uh, so, uh a new wave of migration from north africa means the united states of america is solving its own problems. ukraine, under the guise of this deal, firstly, earns money on exports. the rest is trying to deliver itself, and weapons by sea are goods, products, oh, which the last month is the fate of the poor, but she does not want. it learned that the third world countries receive only and here i will give you a few examples so that you understand, firstly, if you care about the fate of uh, the african peoples fight the territory more than the territory of france is leased or owned by european and american companies, all the grain that is produced there, and there very high yields are exported to the eu and the usa and you do not supply them there. leave the grain there in

uh the united states spent two and a trillion dollars on the war in afghanistan over 20 years of the world uh, the food organization uh was not enough, and in that year 5 billion dollars for the implementation of all its programs, which 5 billion gave to ukraine are ready $1.5 billion a month to allocate, so it's all speculation about this one deal. russia's position is clear russia wants to push through its interests to lift the sanctions. look here for interests. so, of course, russia's interests are being sold to get its own fertilizers. well, let's agree with you that here all measures are interesting. let's stay dots over. let's start with double standards. west means, before the start of a special military operation. all pro-european economists told us that a on a global scale, and russia's gdp is less than 3%. its weak, useless economy, if we isolate it now, will not suffer from this. nobody only

this happened, everyone began to talk about the fact that it was russia that provoked the food crisis, that everyone is starving everyone is dying urgently sos, something needs to be done. this is just about double standards. now, who is pursuing what goal here, and certainly russia also has its own mercantile goal. it lies in the fact that this year we have received 150 million tons of grain , which is 13 million tons more than last year . corn. we now cost exactly the same as it cost 3 years ago. it turns out that our farmers, our agriculture, indeed, having no markets here and having such low prices, are now in a very difficult situation in order to get out of this. we need this corridor this corridor. it costs us dearly in all respects, because from the e ukraine of the black sea e

three ports of ukraine to the bosphorus, russian warships escort the e, the vessel that transports the wheat. it's really big enough costs, but we go for them, in addition to philanthropy, which russia has never forgotten. and mr. slutsky clearly said this. we still want to solve this problem, and you rightly said how much turkey needs it. you know that turkey has overtaken italy in terms of supplying europe with processed grain products. now the main pasta makers are not italians, and most importantly, the pasta makers are turks thanks to what to see? what mr. slutsky also said the west offered russia in vita supplies of ammonia, which is also important to play a key one, which is also worth something to offer, and not only to demand on the bodies of it and quickly, but here it is recycled. these are the ones that turkey is very good at, unfortunately,

you know, the world is much tougher, so that there are no viewers. here we are sitting and discussing poor africans would be poor, we would all take off our expensive cars, cottages of two or three thousand meters, which should be serviced by security and moved to a kabunalka no, so let's now all fight for the national interest, but our the position is healthier once again let me explain, but these sanctions are restrictions, they are artificial, and without that they worsen the unenviable position of these countries and the model that we propose. that's what my colleague was talking about, that is, it's more fair to eat today. you say it is wrong to eat a system today, but a system where the beneficiary is only the collective smell and, above all, atlasation. we want to decentralize this system to new centers. they were able to participate in the regulation of the global economy. that is the question. we have a question for alexander alexander well, after all, it would be appropriate to assume that trust is still a guarantee of a real guarantor for ukraine turkey, we already recalled mr. erdogan and, in the opinion of many experts, the

grain deal , ukraine as a whole. we remember what a key role belarus played earlier and the minsk agreements, if they were implemented, would have prevented what is happening on the territory of ukraine today turkey plays this role how do you evaluate it alexander can this story be more global? this one of my last interviews consisted in the fact that i said that if you don’t do it, male, 2, then you will have to do minsk three, for which, in fact, i was later included in certain lists. here, although, in general, quite logical sensible things were said with regard to turkey, of course, turkey acts as a guarantor of the guarantor, and it plays on a contradiction, that is, turkey now needs a world balance, that is, it is trying to play on contradictions between the west and the russian federation, on

this it wins certain prospects for the future. that is, as colleagues said. yes , turkey is becoming a local geopolitical player. in the middle east, without them, issues cannot be resolved with the help of this balance, which they are trying to create and influence the western world orders. dictating already definite terms. in certain niches regarding russia, first of all , this cooperation with the russian federation is beneficial for turkey and they will guarantee, because a let's not. that erdogan will have elections soon, after all, in the twenty-third year, this is one moment, the inflationary component in turkey is very serious there, about 80% of inflation. after the sixteenth year yes, not an accomplished coup d'état. this situation drags on and the shatkovalka changes sometimes. but nevertheless, it is closer to a stalemate, they need to show certain victories to receive circulation in the budget and receive

certain geopolitical horaces regarding the grain deal, as the guarantor and the redistributor have leverage back. we understand perfectly what is happening now in a certain atlantic union yes, economic cannibalism is taking place, that is, the united states of america in order to stock up on fat to fight china in the future is actually economically destroying its partners in the european union. well, just look at germany. look at the corporations at the companies that work there and that are americans. trying to get himself out yes? alexander thank you very much. what is the role, in your opinion, of the monopolization of a number of markets by large transnational corporations, here, and kargele alexander recalled in the rise in prices for production in general. it is known that a huge part of the same ukrainian grain is exported not by ukrainian farmers themselves, but by american corporations that buy the harvest cheaper and, in fact, manipulate prices

due to the fact that they own elevators and a fleet. you know all world wars. take a look at the history, they start with the division of the sales market and start with the economic crisis, what we are now with you we are very clearly observing with regard to the monopolization that is going on all over the world on all fronts. she is obvious. we already doubt that the united states of america considers europe as its allies, because there is a feeling that they did not decide to bleed europe completely, they force them to invest in ukraine, they force them to transfer all industrial assets, technological assets, and poach a highly trained technological workforce makes her completely dependent on herself. this is clear. why do they need complete hegemony. remember the meeting with mr. si e. the aunt sounded, and one president biden speaks. about a-a world the so-called, yes, or a unipolar

world, everything says that there should be only a lot of the polar world, and at the same time this is a monument. excuse me, vadim, we now have the inclusion of voldemar coat of arms of a german businessman in the past deputy. uh, bundestag, germany waldemar hello good afternoon. and, of course, i know that you are directly connected with the business that you were engaged in, and the export of potash fertilizers and, again , bought such. you have them in belarus after the imposition of sanctions, the situation became catastrophic. tell us about it in more detail and in general. what is the motivation to impose such sanctions by the west. the motivation is the same, if you look at the basis of this process, you have now outlined it for today's uh moment, we are in plan b sometime 4 years ago. i was in america and the conversation turned to

measures to curb the development of russia and influence the western market. e by military intervention - this did not work out the way. uh, then there was still a conflict in georgia, all these small ones. uh, let's say provocative things and so on. this official high-ranking says, most likely, you will have to include plan b. i now see it already in life. plan b says we sacrifice our partner for the sake of our interests. with one blow, we are destroying russia, and most importantly, we are stopping the development of china because 600 million are solvent buyers. the economy of china uh, forward 70% of goods are consumers uh, we bought chinese now we are deprived of this opportunity thanks to the activities of the overseas regional committee and thus we must pay

tribute to them uh, strategic thinking and planning. well, it far exceeds the eastern concepts, about which i have repeatedly said that we need to sit down and create institutions, institutions to promote our ideological ones. i say ours because er and germany belongs to the european community of peoples. we are one continent and the fact that the american embrace is now pulling us out of this family. uh, we all feel very, very bad about this. i do not know how we will get out of this crisis, when 780 90% of pensioners have entered the process of complete impoverishment for years nako state collapsed before our eyes melted the people in complete despair, what will it lead to? uh, i don't know, but the plan of the americans is, uh, 100% being carried out before our

eyes. well, i would like to draw the attention of the guests of our viewers to our plasma, the geography of deliveries of belarusian potassium, the place of belarus among the largest players in the potash fertilizer market , this is exactly what this picture looks like, that is, imposing sanctions, the west screams that it wants to fight world hunger . but at the same time, he himself provides it with the question of how competition with one sides. our partners take advantage of this, they twist their arms and get cheaper prices for potash fertilizers and conclude long-term contracts. even our partners are strategic friends. and, of course, our competitors are companies that also produce fertilizers that match them. there are markets, supply chains are changing, as a rule, contracts are long-term, and we are losing markets. that's the problem. why should russia today deal with its military operation faster, because every month the military the operation damages our euro ends and the quality

is not yes belarusian potassium expressed his opinion president of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko let's listen, please. today they are starting to call. let's do something. i say, please, come, take it. well, the squirrel will not be bent and will work. maybe we will sell less of these potash fertilizers in this volume, but prices have skyrocketed. and that is, we will provide our team with salaries and they will pay taxes normally. that is, in money you we won't lose anything. indeed, now the grain deal has been extended for a specific period. and the russian federation rather has the right to demand certain preferences for itself, but with regards to fertilizers, a ban on their export. can this problem be solved in the future under a

global extension, for example, for a year of grain transportation? but as far as i know, the official ban on the import and export of fertilizers has been lifted. uh, the point is that anyway, unfortunately, the company is provided with difficulties. yes, they are insured. yes, yes, no logistics filmed correctly, the president said, come. let's do new logistics. it is necessary to sit down at the table and, contrary to all western plans , sit down and pragmatically talk about the formation of new logistics routes for finance. and for the commodity itself i am ready for these negotiations. though tomorrow i'll fly down and we'll talk, and we'll line up against all odds, line up in order to talk about it. yes, yes, let's listen now, firstly, what i told you about, you understand, transport and logistics chains are lining up decades, long-term contracts, why forced, then why they blew up the northern streams,

because in order to supply liquefied gas, it is necessary to build infrastructure for the investor . to build infrastructure for liquefied gas, if the contract is at least 20 years old, you see, they destroyed it today, they will build it. what 's the problem. we must not drag out the military operation and must not allow this issue to escalate, because transport and logistics chains are being rebuilt and flows are being redirected. we we lose we lose markets. today, our colleague said correctly in germany, and the anglo-saxons put europe in an uncomfortable position at the same time as a blow to their rival the european union, china and the russian federation , we all lose. that's when we come to our senses on the eurasian continent sits down at the negotiating table. well, what are you colleagues? say e, we already sat down on the 22nd at the negotiating table, when this deal was concluded and what it led to, but sits down at the negotiating table and decides. uh, how to debug and extend this deal? how to enable new

goods? right now we are talking only about grains, and the embargo has indeed been lifted. in relation to, but fertilizers, but the logistics for fertilizers are not built. we are told that we need to sit down and negotiate how we can negotiate with ukraine if, right now, turning away from two steps away from the negotiating table, it begins to act like there is a state of horaces, that you have no sanctions, but you cannot pay. you cannot insure. you cannot insure. that's it and nothing works. all this is fiction. why russia is unhappy with this pre-grain deal, this is the current moment, because formally there is no sanction, but nothing is moving after a short pause. we will return to our discussion again, stay with us. it is very clear that the grain deal has been extended for 120 days. we are talking about this in more detail waldemar. will the

problem be resolved as a whole and this is how alexandrovna says that and with whom does she sit down at the negotiating table if no one gives any guarantees? and it is necessary to withdraw this process from the political state. i think it's time bilateral negotiations between entrepreneurs who will definitely find a solution to these problems and financial flows and logistics flows. but if we keep waiting for the president of the country to sit down to talk with some of these, someone will act as a guarantor, they won’t , because the philosophy of the destruction of the european economy will dominate, but if we sit down as entrepreneurs and agree on in this, despite this, ships under the greek flags sail and carry latin america is provided, because they went along the direct path contract conclusion, they isolated politics from there, and therefore i appeal to your entrepreneurs.

invite me to come with a delegation of german european entrepreneurs, and we will bypass the sanctions of the clip. what does valdemar not understand? that tomorrow, uh, they will agree, and the day after tomorrow a political decision will be made two ships, then by chance the whole deal will collapse, regarding, russia wants negotiations and hints at them everywhere, but not very strong enough, russia’s contractual position will be quite strong contractual position sit will negotiate if the decision. this is a dilemma, in your opinion, of course, no one can guarantee 100% that nothing will fit a certain state, as we already said there, for example, turkey, yes, or others from the middle east who want to participate in this and see their own personal interest in their own development, which - something guarantees in uh, competition, yes, in the free market, yes, which we kind of, as we

talked. let's just remember the free market formula. yeah what a free market generate competition competition concentration walkie-talkie monopoly and monopoly destroys the free market. such an already old old form, which must always be remembered, and we understand that in this competitive struggle, for example, for the same corporatocracy, the west, all means are good. why not apply sanctions against belarus , for example, any argument can be picked up? so you see, relatively speaking, there are corporations, yes, about which we recalled, they have their own market share . and the dimensionless need to evolve, then there is, accordingly, a competitor appears who wants to redistribute this share. of course, they will use state-owned, but mechanisms, but do not have all the possibilities for this. and how do they think? the right, for example, is the same united states of america in order to conduct an insiotion policy for unfair competition, so the question here is not in guarantees, but in geopolitical alignments. we must understand that

all these problems will be solved and will be solved soon . i won't say how much i don't know this tactic does not have information, but the fact that the conflict in the asia-pacific region is brewing and the americans, yes, and their allies. they will switch to the region they already have on the platform. everything, in principle, was prepared in order to conflict there. of course, they will not pull it all. and america will most likely go into the monroe doctrine, only it will not be the monroe doctrine as it was before, because the americans have a huge external public debt, and all countries will save money among themselves. crying and dear colleagues will demand from them the payment of these debts of 31 trillion us dollars of unsupported paper. and let's also remember that now, in fact, for 100% of the us gdp, only 25% is the real sector. everything else is virtual money. it's a soap bubble, so we're seeing a certain fire now. we see now all these

encroachments of dishonest or competitive struggle with other countries. it doesn't matter. it's belarus. it 's china. it's saudi arabia. it doesn't matter. it 's russia doesn't matter. they will be with everyone now to fight in order to somehow stake out, in order to gain time and delay the moment of the inevitable, but this moment of the inevitable can be delayed, but in any case, alexander will come well, look, i would like to go a little to another, and leave the sphere rather to theorize and to philosophize is a rather unusual question. i am sure that you are well aware of the theory of the great replacement. i will explain a little to the viewers , we are talking about the version that the globalist litas deliberately encourage migration to the european union from the usa from the states third in the world and logic. it is understandable, but such a crowd, after all, which is cut off from the roots and thinks exclusively about

survival, is much easier to manage than white native european americans who know how to fight for their rights. and in this sense, is not the current food crisis just one of the means to spur. this is a new great migration of the people, and you are right by the crowd, which is looking for a piece of bread or a workplace, it is much easier to manage, but i want to tell you, my european colleagues will be offended at me if we look at everything, but those words. which are voiced during the protests in europe and they are about the same, raise our wages. reduce. uh, the cost of the food basket expand the number of jobs and no one ever in any of the european countries. i once found this in belgium. only during their protests for the last. for 4 months now they have articulated the reason stop pouring

money into ukraine and imposing sanctions on russia , this is one such little cry. uh, all europe with e, lives from a position of rational choice. yes we need to eat we need to drink. and why do they not think about it at all, and the worst thing is that there is not a single international organization left in the world that could act as some kind of guarantor just the other day it lost its face in the economic and political world, when they adopted resolution in relation to the arrest of the russians. their assets and sent them, so to speak, to separation. thank god, no indemnity to god, but it would be better to attribution, because then the world would have been some kind of conclusion. well question. on what conditions do you represent ukraine? what a challenge this is to the entire world community, and to the community, especially saudi arabia, the arab emirates, which have their assets in european countries, that is, they must

run and run away and take their assets, because tomorrow he may adopt some kind of resolution regarding them, if they will take some wrong step in this political, and the conflict between e ukraine and russia is therefore e russia yes need to solve their problems with a special military operation. but it is no longer our problems that are at war with us. it is not ukraine that is fighting with us. nato mercenaries russia is opposed to all this colossus, not one of them is definitely within the framework of a union state. we feel this support, we understand it and we know it especially in terms of gdp development now, therefore, this problem needs to be solved by everyone, but there is no solution, even international resources are a common problem, that is, it cannot be said that these are their problems, our common problem, and i am now i don't blame russia here i'm talking about what they say, even at the level of our and your power bloc, on the success of a special military operation and on the speed of its completion depends, in principle, the future of the world and

the integrity of the russian federation, do you understand or not? and today. it's just that we're all worried about how bad it is. entry. listen not so everything, as if not such a big apocalypsistan. well, we are not so good, unfortunately. you understand, let's objectively look at this situation. we are with you today until the twenty-fourth of february. many are out there shouted hats got out and waved for 3 days. in kiev , they were waiting for a meeting and received in e, there are no flowers in kiev, that is, it was not a sober assessment of the situation. like mam, they substantiated the need for a special mechanism for the export of ukrainian grain. and if i understand correctly, the russian federation has never stated that it intends to simply block ukrainian grain exports, but we are talking about the safety of navigation of civilian ships in the northern part of the black sea. i just want the viewer to understand this. and this requires

a certain agreement, which we are actually talking about today, because if it were only from a trade blockade. well then , moscow’s actions would hardly have differed from the blockade of cuba by the united states of america of course well , everyone understands that there is a military conflict in the region and it’s easy for civilian ships to get there and leave yes from ports, for example, the same odessa yes and others e , this is a rather difficult situation, because they can be fired upon. there are mines necessary of course then the military-political guarantees under which a ship of one state or another will allow itself to enter the port, load this grain and bring it out for this of course, all these agreements were signed, but can i emphasize again whether they can guarantee. i think they can't. and what will happen then to the ukrainians who live yes, that's on the territory of ukraine about which

the authorities do not care, because inflation works and is still exported. i am also interested in this question. can they guarantee that i will return again , the turks will do everything in order to to participate, to save face in order to balance between russia and the west, therefore. the grain deal, well it will always be in jeopardy. this is a logical question, of course, and i will pay attention to the plasma of respected viewers , this is exactly what the share of ukraine and russia in world grain production looks like. well, the data is such and significant enough to ignore, no matter how someone would like it to work. and now we are talking about a grain deal, we are talking about the format of some kind of cooperation that already exists between ukraine russian federation is the main question. could this be a specific example of a format for finding synergy finding compromises and ending

no here uh, harboring some empty illusions, absolutely not worth it to anyone, because once again, this deal was stopped for 4 1/2 days due to of what our patrol ships are as well. drone attacks that we managed to repulse, but we also forgot about another point. how many with this grain and with these here, and the ships brought weapons there, and illegal ones including weapons, and to ukraine she a few questions, which are the first on migrants , that you asked questions they are interested in migrants, but in controlled migration flows , it is necessary to carry out selection, it is necessary, but uncontrolled migration scares them, you understand? yes, these are the boats, why do they sink on the way to italy second? uh, so about the us and its role and the fact that we already said goodbye to them early. and what

they have always done in the usa, i told you in the last program they staged a war somewhere, especially in europe they are interested. today. they will organize provocations. in the black sea, along the entire perimeter of the russian federation in central asia , in the north caucasus, they are trying to use the contradictions now more and it’s not a fact that the united states did not participate there on purpose. from these missile hits, maybe today they have a task in europe to cut a more global conflict, then assets from europe again. so you say, there the financial bubble will go there real production. today you will drive a german car the shareholders will be the americans in in this we must understand this threat of potential potential not to agree, i answer you 100% correct answer. write the first in the negotiations will begin and the results of the negotiations will be signed only when one country has a decisive advantage. today, neither russia nor the collective. there is no collective agreement between the west . ukraine unfortunately to finish, yes?

dear friends, the verdicts from the end of the conflict in ukraine and i, as i said earlier, will not get tired of repeating that the conflict in ukraine will end when the conflict starts in the asian pacific region. this is being fundamentally used now in order to weaken the russian federation. secondly, to completely eliminate the economic and political ally of the european flagships in the economy in this way, yes, liquidating the european economy. they willy-nilly replenish the russian budget at the expense of the cost and excesses of energy resources. russia - it's balanced europe can't stand it, we understand that. well, just a colleague, very correctly noticed. yes, what will uh german cars, but american made. already volkswagen yes, and others are beginning to transfer their entire production there, the americans accept this, then macron and schultz declare that the americans

are unfairly competing ba. they just noticed that this is an unfair competition, so i will say that they somehow changed their minds. yes, after the forty-fifth year, in uh, to implement the argentau plan, and now they are returning to it and quite a real plan, when will the european economy be destroyed in order to get participants in the discussion, i think our audience will do. those conclusions that he considers necessary, well, finish our program. it seems to me that the famous lines from johann wolfgang's faust will be fair, goethe's fleet is yours. tired, he has more power here and is right. no one will ask whose wealth, where it was taken and at what cost. trade and piracy are three types of essence of one authorized to declare. grain deal paves the way for a big

deal in ukraine old folk wisdom in our program would sound seven times, answer one build this is our formula success two teams and several stages of blitz questions from the host. which country owns easter island funny wrestling? who created the theory of relativity?

we continue to discover new cities and neighborhoods from this hill. orsha begins its report on its almost thousand-year history, a breathtaking view and amazing energy, we show the author's routes and the most mysterious places, the flow of pilgrims is inexhaustible and miracles really happen, numerous facts of healing, suffering from direct confirmation, the main attractions and unique monuments, architecture of monuments to lenin in the city there are several at least four there is even such a riddle . leather hero maya its not a repetitive history of live

and creativity stopping children sculpt something there, yes, but for me it was. so natural, but he also stuck authority on me to blind the group. i instantly took off. and yo what is their meal. i'm with crab waiting to realize u domineering potential when i pour resin. in this silicone mold, i myself can’t fully imagine what will happen on the reverse side, and every time it’s wow, it’s delight and i want to do it. also give a proznovatny generation, the gascons live their lives in good order, your son did. with amazement, this is my son now. e doesn’t even help me, i try to change the situation so that i help him, so that he is the director of the belarusian project about people. which

ones they stumble with with their paddles, since i fell in love with this resin. i just live, i breathe, look at her tv channel belarus 20 shatyry. have you already figured out what to do? tell you? watch the tv series mashkin's house this weekend on

belarus 24 tv channel. music to music and opening thousands of roads before us. can music change the color of a bag? i'm on a break to change us music inside the skin of us.

we will show modern belarus from an unusual angle

, we will discover the unique belarus and its culture, we will provide an opportunity to see and understand what is not visible through the eyes of local residents. and when minsky arrived here, there is silence, calmness, uh, and the weather is good very foreigners about life in belarus friends. they are always there, and they helped me a lot, and they are of great character. i feel very comfortable, sometimes i read my folks, as i'm already used to. eh, not customary at all. watch in the program a look at belarus on belarus 24 tv channel. what vaccines do belarusians offer today? what can be used and how they manifest themselves, well, usually we have a vaccine

that we have been using for many years is purchased at the expense of the republican local budget. this is a russian-made grippol plus vaccine, which contains three viruses, two influenza viruses, and h1n1 and h3 n2 well, different subtypes and an influenza virus, b and for a paid services the vaccine will be used in october. you are a french-made trawl. e, which has four influenza viruses in its composition under the name, that is, two influenza viruses h1 n1h32 and 2 influenza viruses, b there are different lines or rich victoria, we know that in belarus vaccination against coronavirus did not stop. but how compatible are these vaccines? you can either get vaccinated against the flu and coronavirus on the same day, or you need to observe the present tense here. we have moved away from the fact that, as last season, we recommended observing certain intervals, but we have already looked at the experience of many countries and

showed that it is possible to be vaccinated in one day. actually, many in ours in our country. last year. last season, they were also vaccinated on the same day and there were no adverse reactions from this, for example, so this year. basically, we are completely with peace of mind, we recommend getting vaccinated on the same day. firstly, it does not give e the possibility that we may, uh, during the two weeks that pass from one vaccination to another, we can get sick with something and, accordingly , carry the vaccination. we understand that we have two months of october -november for vaccination against influenza, in order to vaccinate, to be vaccinated and to be in time before the rise in the incidence of influenza, so that it has time to work out. tsya immunity, so i think it's very uh a good start for people to think about health.