of belarus the republican beauty contest among large families, mothers, is getting closer to the final gala show in the schedule of participants modeling lessons etiquette briefing talent contest on the stage of the palace of culture in minsk shone not only solo, but also accompanied by children and spouses there are a lot of images for online voting in our country. perhaps, how much our state gives us for a year, so that we only give birth, how many different allowances we have. just a few people know about it enough to ask and the government is very supportive. thank you for this. it might be amazing there. he is how talented our moms are. eh, why do you need such contests? we want to show and here is our union. yes stands for good healthy big families for family traditions. and so what we see today on the stage is beautiful. moms who are not only at the stove in the

kitchen, who are not only at work, yes, oh, which creative people can realize themselves and what we see today is really amazing. in minsk on the basis of chizhovka arena international tournament the strongest belarusian boxers, as well as representatives of russia, uzbekistan , armenia, afghanistan and the congo, take part in boxing in memory of the hero of the soviet union viktor liventsev. the key to the success of any game of erudition is calmness and confidence . the volga region yes the volga region yes and the volga region how much you need to be confident in your answer in order to multiply it in triplicate, both adults and children adhere to this rule. andrey

valerievich hello is a method that motivates you to stretch your brain. no, no, if you do not know, you can not answer the wrong answer. this is -5. nothing wrong. i just remind you to watch on belarus 24 tv channel. why the same events and circumstances are treated differently, who creates new ethics and new information trends, and who benefits from it, no matter how strange it may sound for someone, but there is documentary evidence of this these plans were hatched secretly for many years and were not voiced aloud. and these are proven facts. or is it another xenia

lebedeva will tell you in detail about the phenomenon of double standards. and how they work in the project. this is different, do not miss it on belarus 24 tv channel. here are your roots and your strength to go forward to come to yourself. slow down and enjoy the moment, and the elements will tell you the direction. every step

unity with nature wild ancient the program sas is authorized to declare i am the host nadezhda sas i greet you and remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of everyone and the life of country, but the main events of world politics. i 'll tell you right now donald trump officially announced his intention to run for president of the united states in 2024 trump said that the country is now in

decline , and china is rapidly moving ahead his plans, but trump was quick to make a statement in light of the speculation that the current florida governor, runde sanchez, might have a better chance of taking the white house, now other potential candidates. the address of publications will have to take into account the fact that there is still the most popular politician among conservatives already in the game. on the sidelines of the east asian summit, the first personal meeting of us president joe biden and the president of china took place, the parties did not hide that they consider each other strategic rivals, but at the same time they are trying to avoid steps that would lead to a direct military clash during the year, the americans have repeatedly tested beijing's patience in matters of taiwan, and now, apparently, they decided to take a step to discharge. however, none of the observers. there is no doubt that the transition confrontation between the us

and china is only a matter of time. on november 15, a missile from the ukrainian s-300 air defense system fell on the territory of poland, killing two farmers at first kiev and a number of its eastern european allies were quick to lay the blame on the russian armed forces, which on that day carried out an unprecedented-scale missile attack on infrastructure facilities in many regions of ukraine, including border areas with poland, but this time the americans did not allow to use the incident to escalate the already extremely tense relations between nato and russia , washington rather quickly made it clear through various channels that it was a question of an incorrect operation of the ukrainian air defense, and not a larger intentional russian strike. well, the topic of today's program is the grain deal, who is guilty of global famine, the legendary american

diplomat henry kissinger once remarked while controlling oil. you control the state, but by controlling food. you are in control entire nations humanity has reached the 8 billion mark in a world where so many people food is becoming the number one resource, it is fighting worse than any other rivalry about how daily bread has become a driving force in world politics, and why there is not enough of it for everyone and will be discussed in the program and i am glad to welcome inna alexandrovna vetrenko already present in our studio, doctor of political sciences, professor of the russian federation hello and vadim borovik political scientist. thank you so much for being with me today us, in addition, i would like to connect to our broadcast a political expert from ukraine alexander lazarev good evening alexander hello hope and the audience glad to see you spend money, we begin our discussion program with a

blitz question hunger as it was in the past has again become a weapon. vadim please listen, he never stopped being one, if, uh, in the nineteenth year, uh, there were 150 million more hungry people, and last year, 46 million. only less, more precisely, uh, 146 million was less now at 46 today there are 828 million hungry people in the world. it's not a weapon. this way of existence is impossible, but to distribute the benefits in such a way that a certain part that inhabited the planet had an adequate standard of living and at the same time. uh, the rest of the population had a comparability with them, therefore it is necessary to take control of agricultural land in some regions, please , dear ones. well, regarding hunger, i agree with colleagues, indeed. about a billion people in the world are now starving, this statistic

un but is it possible to distribute? i think that it is simply necessary to abandon certain basic concepts and models of the redistribution of public goods under the capitalist system, when well, five percent of the world's world community, yes, controls almost all resources in particular. this is very well expressed precisely in the western corporatocracy, when there is a transnational corporation of the type, there kargil mansanta, enters the market, completely absorbs these markets from and takes control of entire peoples and states, what you, in fact, said at the beginning of the program, i quoted about it in detail. i am sorry. we have a blitz question, so we answer succinctly. is the world facing a massive famine or is it an exaggeration? what do you think, despite the fact that those who gave rise to global studies and globalization as a phenomenon, the united states of america, within the framework of their election campaigns, disavow this

topic of the global problem of our time, no one has canceled hunger. she was always first positions really in conditions when there is no system of world order, and where not nation-states are actors. as colleagues still correctly say, and not government organizations, transnational companies that concentrate in their hands the main resources to distribute the right supply and consumption the right supply. eh, everyone, uh, in need, but there is no such possibility, so here you need to create a system of world order, accept the same rules of the game and put things in order. ukraine and russia are among the key agricultural producers and not surprisingly, the conflict between them quickly became part of a global battle for food control , both sides accusing each other of provoking famine in poor countries. so and contrary to militant rhetoric. still, they reach

compromises. the main one was the grain deal about what kind of agreement it is and what its complexities are. see our story on july 22 russia ukraine turkey and he signed an agreement that many call a grain deal. she assumed the creation of sea corridors for the safe export of grain, sunflower oil and fertilizers from three ports of ukraine, first of all, the agreement was of a humanitarian nature in many countries famine erupted against the backdrop of a sharp rise in food prices, africa, asia and latin america were especially hard hit however, at the end of october, russia had to to suspend participation in the agreement due to security concerns, the ships of the black sea fleet were attacked by drones in the sevastopol bay, the russian military succeeded repel the attack by destroying 16 drones, however, 218 ships that participated in the grain deal were blocked by these drones and

uh, underwater and aerial drones. they partly walked in the corridor along which grain is exported from ukraine, and thus they created a threat to our ships, which should ensure the safety of grain exports, and to civilian ships that are involved in this. and we committed ourselves. provide this security, well, if you excuse me for the simplicity of expression, if in ukraine, we will be guilty under these courts. we are 4 days later. russia resumed its participation. before that, moscow put forward a number of conditions, kiev gave written guarantees not to use the grain corridor for military purposes, and at the un a promise to quickly persuade western countries not to interfere with russian agricultural exports, that is, russian grain and fertilizer will be exported in the same volumes as ukrainian raw materials from the united states and the eu continue to block fertilizer and agricultural products from entering world

markets. we will take this into account when considering questions about the feasibility of extending the grain deal an important role. in this whole process, the president of turkey played a rejeper. it was under his leadership. turkey has practically become the main beneficiary of the grain agreement, both in the economic sense, it is the purchase of cheap grain from ukraine, and in the political sense, turkey, led by erdo. we became the organizer of the peace process , it is worth noting that third world countries do not receive even ten percent of wheat supplies. the lion's share of exports from ukraine falls on ankara and the european union, african and middle eastern countries get less than five to seven percent. instead of wheat. ukraine began to export more expensive raw materials, corn, barley and sunflower oil; turkey, spain, the netherlands, china and egypt became the beneficiaries of exports, while ports and sea routes were used to supply weapons to ukraine, therefore, the export of ukrainian grain. it should

not be viewed from the economic side. and from the geopolitical one a month before the grain deal. this was also noted by alexander lukashenko, well, we cracked down quickly. putin and i discussed this problem. i say, don't worry there is no grain there as much as they scream and it's not about the grain. they want to accuse us with you that we made a global voice. we are such giants, what made a famine in the world began to understand? they just had to hang some other world-class problem on us and africans and asians to say, it's him. they are two dictators together. he does what well, i'm glad to welcome leonid slutsky leader in our program faction of the liberal democratic party of the chairman of the committee on international affairs of the state duma of the federal assembly of the russian federation good evening. to greet. and i know that you are an

experienced and resolute politician, so i will ask you a question. perhaps even in some ways the toughest grain deal is most actively criticized by those who are as tough as possible in relation to the west towards ukraine against any compromises, speaking relatively speaking, voters in your party, if possible, and so to speak, and in their system of coordinates the very existence of the grain deal - it already looks like as the defeat of the russian federation as a certain deflection in relation to the west tell me, please, because it appeared even in the lexicon, and such a phrase is such a notorious political contract. incidentally, i am absolutely critical of this. but still, why is this a deal, including beneficial to the russian federation? let's not. uh, hope to make

a mess someone criticizes. this is their business in our party. healthy people. we have a constructive opposition party. we must forget, and the final recipient. eh this grain is another thing when by the grain corridor is being hit by unmanned aerial vehicles when missile attacks are somehow planned along the grain corridor, and we had this information, of course. this grain corridor was closed. it threatened the ships. and it threatened the safety of the people, as far as the grain deal should go. it's not, uh, a situation that, uh, should balance our uh. today we see destructive interaction with kiev and these

issues. we will decide or on the margins of a special military operation or in negotiations, when kiev agrees to them again. you remember that i am one of those four negotiators appointed by the president of russia from our side, which participated in negotiations with kiev for quite a long time, but then the ukrainian side, e . , aggravated with the nazi regime in kiev, you balance it with the fact that we stop grain supplies to those countries that are really in need them, which are ours. and the population that we need to support as healthy people in every possible way, so the grain deal will continue, yes, hope, thank you very much, but i would like to clarify more. with regards to you, what is the

impact of western sanctions against russian and belarusian fertilizers on the intensification of the global food crisis. it is no secret that the availability of fertilizers to overcome hunger is always higher. than the availability of supplies. just grains from the same ukraine or the russian federation, it's like in the famous parable that it is wise to give a person not just a few fish, but a fishing rod. we, uh, we need to combine both the fishing rod and the fish of sanctions and restrictions, the number of which simply rolls over. eh, absolutely. e does not fit with any sane approach. some time ago, uh, of course, until february of this year. as a member of our delegation to the general assembly, i addressed the russian delegation by general secretary

antonio guttasha to the sound politicians in the world. e. i received over 60 responses from country leaders from the same huttersch, and that sanctions should generally be sincere from today's realities. this is a vestige of atavism haitism. eh, in today's world politics, this is not to be, we must build a balanced world architecture. me, of course, theoretically like uh can. to be taken solely by decision of the united nations security council, we see completely different realities. more than 10,000 sanctions are visible today, then against russia against belarus there are also enough of them, including uh against a company that operates in the field of, uh, the production and export of mineral fertilizers, however , everything related to e. hmm importing mineral fertilizers to, uh, the countries that

need it. we uh, have, uh, supply opportunities, and in this case, of course, because of the sanctions. here, uh, the mechanics are broken, this is so and there is no need to hush it up, but let's have a fishing rod and a fish. we will give to those who need, and i would like to ask the last question regarding your attitude. how would you rate the overall role turkey not only in grain? but also in an attempt to find a way to resolve the conflict in ukraine as a whole know turkey despite the fact that we sometimes sparks somewhere in international sorry bilateral relations. uh has been and will remain among our closest partners with regard to the assistance to turkey and his personal experience of this president of turkey in e. not easy. uh, dossier of negotiations with ukraine. do you

remember that one of the rounds of negotiations took place in istanbul and erdogan even delayed flying a few hours later to uzbekistan in order for this round personally open. it seems to me that here it is necessary to say that the turkish side, e, tried to do everything possible so that, with the mediation of ankara, moscow and kiev would find a common language faster and to a greater extent. how much did it succeed? it's a matter of diction. this is a q question agree with you absolutely. thank you very much, let 's hope so, thank you leonid eduardovich for participating in the program. well, we are moving on. further, i would like us to pay attention to our plasma, this is exactly what the istanbul grain corridor looks like, and the extension of work which they have agreed. i would like to draw your attention to the fact that

the united nations organizations remained the guarantees for the implementation of the initiative, and turkey , naturally, ukraine turned to, uh, partners within the framework of the initiative with a proposal to extend its minimum. for a year, including the port of nikolaev in it, because at the moment it has been extended for 120 days in one. what do you think, will the russian federation support this initiative? this is a purely speculative question, no one is their fate worries all the sellers. its interests in this region, of course, the position of the russian federation is more sensible, because there are sanctions and logistical restrictions. they lead to shortages and rise in prices, but turkey strengthens its influence in the region, receives cheap russian grain and creates it for itself. uh, energy hubs get energy cheaply. the european union is stuffing itself for feed at the expense of this deal and is trying to prevent it. uh, that means, uh a new wave of migration from north africa means the

united states of america is solving its own problems. ukraine, under the guise of this deal, firstly, earns money on exports. and secondly, he is trying to deliver himself, and weapons are thick in the sea. these are goods products about which the last month is the fate of the poor, uh, she does not want to. it learned that the third world countries receive only and here i will give you a few examples so that you understand, firstly, if you care about the fate of, uh, the african peoples, the territory more than the territory of france is leased or owned by european and american companies, all the grain that is produced there, and there very high yields are exported to the eu and the usa and you do not supply them there. leave the grain there the united states spent two and three trillion dollars on the war in afghanistan over 20 years of the world e, the food organization e was not enough, and

that year $5 billion for the implementation of all its programs, which gave $5 billion to ukraine 1,5 billion dollars a month to the eu to allocate, so all this is speculation regarding this one deal. russia's position is clear russia wants to push through its interests to lift sanctions are about the interests of sanctions. it means to get their fertilizers. of course, it's normal that russia's interests rejoice. well, let's agree with you that everyone here has mercantile interests. come on, well done point over let's start with double standards. west means, before the start of a special military operation. all pro-european economists told us that a on a global scale, and russia's gdp is less than 3%. its weak, useless economy, if we isolate it now, will not suffer from this. nobody only this happened, everyone began to talk about the fact that it was russia that provoked the food crisis, that everyone is starving everyone is dying urgently sos, something needs

to be done. this is just about double standards. now, who is pursuing what goal here, and certainly russia also has its own mercantile goal, and it lies in the fact that this year we, uh, received 150 million tons of grain, which is 13 more. uh, then 13 million tons than last year, at the same time, many sales markets in our country turned off, slammed shut, of course, and grain also closed. we now cost exactly the same as it cost 3 years ago. it turns out that our farmers, our agriculture, indeed, having no markets here and having such low prices, are now in a very difficult situation in order to get out of this. we need this corridor this corridor. it costs us dearly in all respects, because from the e ukraine of the black sea e three ports of ukraine to the bosphorus, russian warships escort the e, the vessel that transports the

wheat. it's really big enough costs, but we go for them, in addition to philanthropy, which russia has never forgotten. and mr. slutsky clearly said this. we still want to solve this problem. you correctly said how much turkey needs it, you know that turkey has overtaken italy in terms of supplying europe to europe with already processed grain products. now the main pasta, not the italians, and most importantly, the pasta turks, thanks to what to note? what mr. slutsky also said the west offered russia in vita supplies of ammonia, which is also important to play a key one, it also costs something offer, not only require bodies very quickly, but here it is recycled. these are the ones that turkey is very good at, unfortunately, you know, the world is much tougher, so that there are no viewers . here we are sitting and discussing poor africans would be poor, we would all take off our expensive cars, cottages of two or three thousand meters each, which should be serviced by security and

move to a kabunalka no, so now let's all fight for national interests, but our the position is more sensible, i will explain once again, but these here are the sanctions of limitation, they are artificial, and without that they worsen the unenviable position of these countries and the model that we propose. that's what my colleague was talking about, that is, it's more fair to eat today. you say it is wrong to eat a system today, but a system where the beneficiary is only the collective smell and, above all, atlasation. we want to decentralize this system to new centers. they were able to participate in the regulation of the global economy. that's the question. we need a question to alexander alexander well after all, it would be appropriate to assume that trust is still a guarantee of a real guarantor for ukraine turkey, we already recalled mr. erdogan and, in the opinion of many experts, the grain

deal , in general. we remember what a key role belarus played earlier and the minsk agreements, if they were implemented, would have prevented what is happening on the territory of ukraine today turkey plays this role how do you evaluate it alexander can this story be more global? this one of my last interviews consisted in the fact that i said that if you don’t do it, male, 2, then you will have to do minsk three, for which, in fact, i was later included in certain lists. here, although, in general, quite logical sensible things were said with regard to turkey, of course, turkey acts as a guarantor of the guarantor, and it plays on a contradiction, that is, turkey now needs a world balance, that is, it is trying to play on contradictions between the west and the russian federation, on this it wins certain prospects for the future. that is, as colleagues said. yes , turkey is becoming a local geopolitical

player. in the middle east, without them, issues cannot be resolved with the help of this balance, which they are trying to create and influence the western world orders. dictating already definite terms. in certain niches regarding russia, first of all , this cooperation with the russian federation is beneficial for turkey and they will guarantee, because a let's not. that erdogan will have elections soon, after all, in the twenty-third year, this is one moment, the inflationary component in turkey is very serious there, about 80% of inflation. after the sixteenth year yes, not an accomplished coup d'état. this situation drags on and the shatkovalka changes sometimes. but nevertheless, it is closer to a stalemate, they need to show certain victories to receive circulation in the budget and receive certain geopolitical horaces regarding the grain deal, as the guarantor and the redistributor have leverage back. we understand perfectly

what is happening now in a certain atlantic union yes, economic cannibalism is taking place, that is, the united states of america in order to stock up on fat to fight china in the future is actually economically destroying its partners in the european union. well, just look at germany. look at the corporations at the companies that work there and that are american. get it all out again, huh? alexander thank you very much. what is the role, in your opinion, of the monopolization of a number of markets by large transnational corporations. here, and alexander recalled the kargele in the rise in prices for production in general. it is known that a huge part of the same ukrainian grain is exported not by ukrainian farmers themselves, but by american corporations that buy the harvest cheaper and, in fact, manipulate prices due to the fact that they own elevators and a fleet. you know all world wars. take a look at the history, they start with

the division of the sales market and start with the economic crisis, what we are now with you. we are very clearly observing with regard to monopolization, which goes all over the world on all fronts. she is obvious. we already now doubt that the united states of america and europe are considered as their allies, because there is a feeling that they did not decide europe without bloodshed completely they force them to invest in ukraine and they force them to transfer all industrial assets technological assets, and a highly trained technological workforce to entice her to him makes her completely dependent on herself. this is clear. why do they need complete hegemony. remember meeting with mr. si e. the aunt sounded, and one president biden, says, about the so -called world, yes, the unipolar world, everything says that there should only be a lot of polar world and at the same time this is a monument. excuse me, vadim,

we are now turning on voltemar. coat of arms of a german businessman in the past deputy. uh, bundestag, germany waldemar hello good afternoon. and, of course, i know that you are directly connected with the business that you were engaged in, but export, and kalina is thin and, again, you bought them in in belarus, after the imposition of sanctions, the situation became catastrophic. tell us about it in more detail and in general. what is the motivation for imposing such sanctions from the west? well, the motivation is the same if you look at the basis of this process. now we have designated it for today, uh, we are in plan b sometime 4 years ago. i was in america and the conversation turned to measures to curb the development of russia and influence the western market. e by military intervention - this did not work out the way.

uh, then there was still a conflict in georgia, all these small. uh, let's say provocative things and so on. this high-ranking official says, most likely, we will have to include a plan b. i now see it already in life. plan b says we sacrifice our partner for the sake of our interests. with one blow, we are destroying russia, and most importantly , we are stopping the development of china because 600 million are solvent buyers. china's economy e, forward 70% of goods are consumers e, bought chinese now we are deprived of this opportunity thanks to the activities of overseas regional committee and thus it is necessary to give credit to their e, strategic thinking and planning. well, it far exceeds the eastern concepts, about which i have

repeatedly said that we need to sit down and create institutions, institutions to promote our ideological ones. i say ours because er and germany belongs to the european community of peoples. we are one continent and the fact that the american embrace is now pulling us out of this family. uh, we all feel very, very bad about this. i don't know how we will get out of this crisis, when 780 90% of pensioners entered the process of complete impoverishment for years nako the state collapsed before our eyes the people melted in complete despair, what will this lead to? uh, i don't know, but the plan of the americans is, uh, 100% being carried out before our eyes. well, i would like to draw the attention of the guests of our viewers to our plasma, the geography of deliveries of belarusian potassium, the place of belarus among the largest players

in the potash fertilizer market, this is exactly what this picture looks like, that is, by imposing sanctions, the west is shouting that it wants to fight world hunger . but at the same time, he himself provides it with the question of how competition is on the one hand. our partners take advantage of this, they twist their arms and get cheaper prices for potash fertilizers and conclude long-term contracts. even our partners are strategic friends. and, of course, our competitors are companies that also produce fertilizers that match them. there are markets, supply chains are changing, as a rule, contracts are long-term, and we are losing markets. that's the problem. why is russia today should quickly sort out its military operation, because every month the military operation damages, it is in our interests to finish smoking and quality with it. yes, the belarusian potassium expressed his opinion of the president of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko, let's listen,

please. today, they are already starting to call on the sly . let's do something. i say, please, come, take it, but the squirrel will not be bent, it will work. maybe we will sell less of these potash fertilizers in this volume, but prices have skyrocketed, and that is, we will provide they will pay their staff salaries and taxes normally, that is, you will not lose anything in money. indeed, now the grain deal has been extended for a specific period. and the russian federation rather has the right to demand certain preferences for itself, but what about the ban on their export of fertilizers? can this problem be solved in the future under a global extension, for example, for a year of the grain deal? but as far as i know, the official ban on the import and

export of fertilizers has been lifted. eh, the point is that everything equally unfortunately, the company is provided with difficulties. yes, yes, the logistics did not take off correctly, the president said, come. let's do new logistics. it is necessary to sit down at the table and, contrary to all western plans, sit down and pragmatically talk about the formation of new logistics routes for finance. and for the commodity itself i am ready for these negotiations. though tomorrow i’ll fly down and we’ll talk, and we’ll line up. in spite of everyone, we’ll line up so that we need to talk about it, right? yes, listen, firstly, what i told you, you understand, chains of transport, logistics line up for decades, long-term contracts, why forced? so, why did they disrupt the northern streams? because in order to supply slurry. yes, it is necessary to build gas infrastructure to the advantage of the investor. to build infrastructure for liquefied gas, if the contract is at least 20 years old, you see, they

destroyed it today, they will build it. what is the problem. we must not delay the military operation, and even this issue cannot be escalated, because transport logistics are being rebuilt chains are reoriented flows, we are losing markets, and today our colleague correctly said in germany and europe with the anglo-saxons put an uncomfortable position at the same time as a blow to their rival the european union, china and the russian federation, we are all losing. that's when we come to our senses on the eurasian continent, well, someone sits down at the negotiating table. well, what are you colleagues? say e, we already sat down on the 22nd at the negotiating table, when this deal was concluded and what it led to, but sits down at the negotiating table and decides. eh, how debug and extend this deal? how to enable new items? right now we are talking only about grains, and the embargo has indeed been lifted. in relation to, but fertilizers, but the logistics for fertilizers

are not built. we are told that we need to sit down and negotiate how we can negotiate with ukraine if, turning away, moving two steps away from the negotiating table, it begins to act as if there is a guarantee from the state that you do not have a sanction, but you cannot pay. you can not insure. you cannot insure. that's it and nothing works. all this is fiction. why is russia unhappy with this single dozer ? here at the moment, because formally there is no sanction, but nothing goes after a short pause. we will return to our discussion again. stay with us authorized to declare the grain deal has been extended for 120 days. we are talking about this in more detail waldemar will the problem be resolved as a whole, and this is how aleksandrovna says that a sits down at the negotiating table with whom if no one gives any guarantees. and you have to take it out

this process from the political state. i think that the time has come for bilateral negotiations between entrepreneurs who will definitely find a solution to these problems and financial flows and logistics flows. but if we keep waiting for the president of the country to sit down to talk with some of these someone will not act as a guarantor, they will not, because the philosophy of the destruction of the european economy will dominate, but if we sit down as entrepreneurs and agree about it, despite these are ships sailing under greek flags and carrying latin america is provided, because they took the path of direct contracting and isolated politics from there, and therefore i appeal to your entrepreneurs. invite me to come with a delegation of german european entrepreneurs, and we will bypass the sanctions, moving clips. what does valdemar

not understand? that tomorrow, uh, they will make an agreement, and the day after tomorrow, a political decision will be made two ships sink by accident and the whole deal, uh, will collapse regarding, russia wants negotiations and hints at them everywhere, but not too weak, the contractual position. now, when russia has a sufficiently strong contractual position, they will negotiate with it, please, if the solution to this dilemma, in your opinion, of course, no one will absolutely guarantee nothing . uh, a certain state already fits in there, for example, turkey, yes, or others from the middle east who want to semi-participate in this and see definitely their own personal interest with their own development, some guarantees in e competition, yes in the free market, yes, which we kind of talked about. let's just remember the free market formula. yes, that the free market generates competition, competition , concentration, monopoly, and monopoly destroys

freedom. the market is such an old old form that must always be remembered, and we understand that in this competitive struggle, for example, for the same corporatocracy, the west, all means are good. why not apply sanctions against belarus , for example, any argument can be picked up? here you see, relatively speaking, there are corporations, yes, which we recalled, they have their own market share, the market is not indispensable, it is necessary to develop, that is, accordingly, a competitor appears who wants to redistribute this share. these are all possibilities. and how do they think? the right, for example, the same united states of america in order to conduct an innovative policy for unfair competition, so the question here is not about guarantees, but about geopolitical alignments. we must understand that all these problems will be solved and will be solved soon . i won't say how much i don't know, this tactic has no information. well, the fact that the conflict in the asia-pacific region is overdue. and

the americans, yes, and their allies. they will switch to the region they already have on the platform. everything, in principle, was prepared in order to conflict there. of course, they didn’t pull it all. and america will most likely go into the monroe doctrine, only it will not be as fucking monroe as it was before, because the americans have a colossal external public debt, and all countries will unite economically with each other and dear colleagues will demand from them the payment of these debts of 31 trillion us dollars of unsupported paper. and let's also remember that now, in fact, for 100% of the us gdp, only 25% is the real sector. everything else is virtual money. it's a soap bubble, so we're seeing a definite fire now. we see now all these encroachments of dishonest or competitive fight with other countries. it doesn't matter this is belarus this is china this is saudi arabia did not judge. it 's russia doesn't matter. well, with everyone now

, to enter into such a fight in order to somehow stake out, in order to gain time and delay the moment inevitably, but this moment of the inevitable can be delayed, but in any case, alexander will come well, look, i would like to go a little to another, but the sphere leave rather to theorize and philosophize a rather unusual question. i am sure you are well aware of the theory of the great replacement. i am i’ll explain a little to the audience that we are talking about the version that the globalists are deliberately encouraging migration to the european union and the usa from the third countries in the world and logic. it is understandable, but such a crowd, after all, which is cut off from the roots and thinks exclusively about survival, is much easier to manage than white native european americans who know how to fight for their rights. and in this sense, the current food

crisis is not just one of the means to spur it on. this is a new great migration of peoples. ah. you're right a crowd that is looking for a piece of bread or a workplace is much easier to manage, but i want to tell you, yes, my european colleagues will not be offended by me if we look at everything, and those slogans that are voiced during protests in europe and they are about the same increase our wages to carry. uh, the cost of a food basket expand the number of jobs and no one has ever found it in any of the european countries and once in belgium. only during their protests for the last. for 4 months now they have articulated the reason stop it pouring money into ukraine and imposing sanctions on russia is just one such little opal. uh, all of europe with uh, lives with a position of rational choice. yes, we need to eat

. we need to drink. and why do they not think about it at all, and the worst thing is that there is not a single international organization left in the world that could act as some kind of guarantor just the other day, he lost his face in both the economic and political world, when they adopted resolution regarding the arrest of russian assets and sent them, so to speak, for separation. thank god, there is no indemnity to god, but it would be better if there was an indemnity, because then some kind of peace would be concluded. well question. on what conditions do you represent ukraine? what a challenge this is to the entire world community, and to the community, especially saudi arabia to the arab emirates, which have their assets in european countries, that is, they must jump off at a run, run away and take their assets, because tomorrow he may adopt some kind of resolution regarding them, if they will do something a wrong step in this political, and the conflict between e. ukraine and russia, therefore, russia yes

, you need to solve your problems with a special military operation. but it is no longer our problems that are at war with us. not ukraine is at war with us. nato mercenaries russia is opposed to all this colossus, not one of them is definitely within the framework of the union state. we feel this support, we understand it, and we know it, especially in terms of the development of gdp e now, so this problem needs to be solved by everyone, and there is no one to solve it. no, even between a common problem, then then to say that these are our common problems and the lizards do not blame russia, i am saying that they say this even at the level of our and your power bloc , the future of the world and the integrity of the russian federation depend on the success of a special military operation on the speed of its completion federations understand or not and today is big. it's just that we all worry about how badly we eat. listen not so everything hp is not such a big apocalypse there. well, we're not so good either. unfortunately, you understand, let's

objectively look at this situation. we are with you today before february 24th. many were shouting there, they took out their hats and waved for 3 days. in kiev, they were waiting for flowers in kiev, they didn’t, that is, it was a drunken assessment of the situation. god grant that everything will be, i agree with the russian federation as a whole justified the need for a special mechanism for the export of ukrainian grain. and if i understand correctly, the russian federation has never stated that it intends to simply block ukrainian grain exports, but we are talking about the safety of navigation of civilian ships in northern part of the black sea. i just want the viewer to understand this. and this requires a certain agreement, which we are actually talking about today, because if it were only a trade blockade, well, then

moscow’s actions would hardly have differed from the blockade of cuba by the united states of america of course well , everyone understands that there is a military conflict in the region and it’s easy for civilian ships to get there and leave yes from ports, for example, the same odessa yes and others, uh, this is quite a difficult situation, because they can be fired upon. there are mines there , of course, then necessary military-political guarantees, under which a ship of one state or another will allow itself to enter the port, load this grain and bring it out. of course, all these agreements were signed, but can i emphasize again whether they can guarantee. i think they can't. and what will happen then to the ukrainians who live yes, but on the territory of ukraine yes, which the authorities do not care about, because inflation works and grain is transported, this question also interests me. can i guarantee that i will return again, the turks will do everything in order to

participate, in order to save face in order to balance between russia and the west, therefore. the grain deal, well it will always be in jeopardy. this is logical and i will pay attention to the plasma of respected viewers, this is exactly what the share of ukraine and russia in world grain production looks like. well, the data is such and significant enough to ignore, no matter how someone would like it to work. and now we're talking about a grain deal, we're talking about the format of some kind of cooperation that already exists between ukraine and the russian federation is the main question. can this be a specific example of a format for finding interaction, finding

compromises and ending ? that our patrol ships as well. drone attacks that we managed to repulse, but we also forgot about another point. how many weapons have been brought there with this grain and with these ships, and illegal b number of weapons, and to ukraine, she has a few questions, which are the first on migrants, that you asked questions they are interested in migrants, but in controlled migration flows, they accept to carry out selection to take who is needed, but uncontrolled migration scares them, you understand? yes, these are the boats, why do they sink on the way to italy second? uh, so about the us and its role and the fact that we already said goodbye to them early. and what they always did in the usa, i told you in the last program, they staged a war somewhere, especially here in europe they are interested. today. they will arrange provocations. in the black sea, along the entire perimeter of the russian federation in central asia

, in the north caucasus, they are trying to use the contradictions now more and it’s not a fact that the united states did not participate there on purpose. from these missile hits, maybe today they have a task. in europe, cut a more global conflict, then axio from europe again. so you say, there the financial bubble will go there real production. today you will ride german car shareholders will be the americans in this, we must understand this potential potential threat to negotiate, i answer you 100% correct answer. write down the first in the negotiations will begin and the results will be closed only when one side has a decisive advantage. today, neither russia nor the collective. there is no collective agreement between the west . ukraine to complete, right? so , dear friends, well, mower, negotiations or the end of the conflict in ukraine, as i said

earlier and i will not get tired of repeating that the conflict in ukraine will end when the conflict in the asia-pacific region begins. this is fundamental, as they use now in order to firstly weaken the russian federation. secondly, to completely eliminate the economic, yes, and political ally of the european flagship economy in this way, yes, liquidating the european economy. they voluntarily involuntarily replenish the russian budget, often the cost and excesses of energy resources. russia it 's being balanced europe can't stand it, we just understand it colleagues. very correct noticed. yes, there will be, uh, german cars, but american-made. already volkswagen yes , and others are beginning to transfer their entire production there, the americans accept this, then macron and schol declare that the americans are unfairly competing ba. just noticed that this is such an unfair competition. i would say that they somehow changed their minds. yes , after the forty-fifth year, in uh, to embody the

argentau plan, and now they are returning to it and quite a real plan, when there will be destruction european economy in order to get the panellists, i think our audience will do. water, which he sees fit, well, finish our program. it seems to me rightly it will be the famous lines from johann wolfgang's faust. goethe fleet - this is your charter in whom there is more power, he is right. no one will ask whose wealth, where it was taken and at what cost. trade and piracy are three types of essence of one sas authorized to declare. grain deal paves the way for a big deal in ukraine unique

canography and unusual architectural solutions shape of our dome, it is very unique; it is made of two domes in the form of a knight's helmet. interesting facts from expert art historians of similar iconography . and, of course, in this touching tenderness, there are also tragic notes of the help of god's word, the healing power of prayer, the holy image visible with bodily eyes. we ascend to the heavenly world with spiritual eyes often through the holy icons god gives people his help routes through the prayerful and holy places of belarus and novogrudok areas. and all this gives us the opportunity to

turn again to our history. in principle, we ca n’t now, as a people, so it’s great that we are returning to the origins of our nation, watch spiritual educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel. in times of rapid change, it is important for us to show you. the main thing is that the country has fixed a clear position, which it adheres to. today we keep history, value the achievements of generations and honor the traditions of global perspectives, high diplomacy and social research. however, the fact remains that dialogue platforms have started working. and these are the chances for everyone to be heard , we will draw detailed conclusions, see exclusive interviews and talk about the main events on the main air. watch it on tv channel belarus 24. light

i broke this entire huge huge tower overnight and in two days i made a complete copy of the portrait , enlarged one fits, he says. fu, well, okay, and then i was afraid i thought that you were mediocre, and the leo -skinned heroes broke away from their mastership to the fullest and become the hardest of their correction. charm epoxy resin also lies in the fact that each product is unique. it cannot be repeated like a ring or an earring or a plate. i myself did not understand when i reached this level, where i am now today. it was in them that my goals of the task were paid and almost. it seems to me that we have reached the belarusian project on our tv channel. with belarusian korans in abel, a

geographical hierological additional investigation from yourself , you chose exactly the type of otshima in europe, so there are mountains there in the alps carpathians perm accompanying legends. ale truth was only one i surrender. i understood that i could have left europe quite well, and the school can so easily become such a political documentary film on a belarusian ignatian.

this is a panorama of the live broadcast of the main events of wednesday, on november 23 i will tell you, i am sergey lugovsky hello, csto the status of the organization, the priority areas for the concentration of efforts are the most acute, the international issues of the region.