in the hands of the book throated side by side, choking with a skin word man's creativity is the most wonderful and worthy of respect, these books in books live dunks past memos expressively improve people's voices.

belarusian korans in abel geographic and logical additional investigation

28 years ago they announced amnesty. what did you think on the tv channel belarus 20 shatyry? their path was not

easy. during the night i broke this entire huge huge tower there and in 2 days to make a complete copy of the portrait, enlarged, my correction is that each product is unique. it cannot be repeated like a ring or an earring or a plate. i myself did not understand when i reached this level, where i am now today, it was precisely my goals of the task that were embodied and almost.

the program sas is authorized to declare i am the host nadezhda sas greetings, i remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes,

events, people will affect the life of everyone from the life of the country, and the main events of world politics. i 'll tell you right now donald trump is official announced his intention to run for the presidency of the united states in 2024 trump said that the country is now in decline, and china is rapidly moving forward and his return to the post of head of state will make america great again few people doubted his plans anyway, but trump hastened to do a statement in light of speculation that current florida gov. runde sanchez may have a better chance of taking the white house. now the rest of the potential republican candidates. they will have to take into account that there still. the most popular politician among conservatives is already in the game on the sidelines of the east asian summit, the first personal meeting between us president joe biden and the president of china took place, the parties did not hide the fact that they consider

each other strategic rivals, but at the same time strive to avoid steps that would lead to direct military clash over the course of a year, the americans repeatedly tested beijing's patience in matters of taiwan, and now, apparently, they decided to take a step towards detente. however, none of the observers. no no doubt that the transition confrontation between the us and china it is only a matter of time. on november 15, a missile from the ukrainian s-300 air defense system fell on the territory of poland, killing two farmers at first kiev and a number of its eastern european allies were quick to lay the blame on the russian armed forces, which on that day carried out an unprecedented-scale missile attack on infrastructure facilities in many regions of ukraine including border ones with a larger one, but this time the americans did not allow the incident to be used to escalate already extremely tense relations between nato and russia

, washington quickly made it clear through various channels that it was a question of an incorrect operation of the ukrainian air defense, and not a larger intentional russian strike. well, the topic of today's program is the grain deal, who is to blame for global famine, the legendary american diplomat henry kinsinger once remarked while controlling oil. you control the state, but by controlling food. you control entire nations humanity has reached the throat of 8 billion and in in a world where so many people food becomes the number one resource because of it there is a fight worse than any other rivalry about how daily bread has become a driving force in world politics and why there is not enough of it for everyone and will be discussed in the program and i am glad to welcome inna aleksandrovna vetrenko, doctor of political sciences, professor of the russian federation, is already present in our studio

hello and vadim borovik, a political scientist. thank you very much for being with us today, in addition, i would like to connect to our air political expert from ukraine oleksandr lazarev good evening oleksandr hello nadezhda and the audience glad to see you, spend it, we start our discussion program with a blitz question of hunger, as it was in the past, has again become a weapon. vadim please listen, he never stopped being one, if, uh, in the nineteenth year, uh, there were 150 million more hungry people, and last year, 46 million. only less, more precisely, uh, 146 million was less now by 46 today there are 828 million hungry people in the world. it's not a weapon. this the mode of existence is impossible, but to distribute the benefits in such a way that a certain part that

inhabited the planet has an adequate standard of living and at the same time. uh, the rest of the population had a comparability with them, therefore, it is necessary to take control of the agricultural years, alexander, please , dear words to you. well, regarding hunger, i agree with my colleague, indeed. about a billion people in the world are now starving, these un statistics, but can it be distributed? i think it's possible to just it is necessary to abandon certain basic concepts and models of the redistribution of public goods under the capitalist system, when well, five percent of the world's world community, yes, controls virtually almost all resources in particular. this is very well expressed precisely in the western corporatocracy, when there is a transnational corporation of the type, there is a kargil mansant, enters the market, completely absorbs these markets from and takes control of entire peoples and states, then what you, in fact, said at the beginning of the program quoted about

it in detail. i am sorry. we have a quick question, so we answer succinctly whether the world is facing a large-scale famine or is it still an exaggeration. what do you think, despite the fact that those who gave rise to global studies and as a phenomenon, the united states of america, within the framework of their election campaigns , disavow this topic of the global problem of our time, no one has canceled hunger. it has always been in the first positions indeed in conditions where there is no system of world order, and where there are no national states are the authors. and as colleagues correctly say , not government organizations are transnational companies that concentrate the main resources in their hands to distribute the right supply and consumption the right supply. eh, everyone, uh, in need, but there is no such possibility, so here you need to create a system of world order, accept the same rules of the game and put things in order. ukraine and russia are among the

key producers of agricultural products and it is not surprising that the conflict between them is very fast. has become part of a global battle for food control as sides accuse each other of provoking famine in poor countries. so and contrary to militant rhetoric. still, they reach compromises. the main one was the grain deal about what kind of agreement it is and what its complexity is. see our story on july 22 russia ukraine turkey and he signed an agreement that many call a grain deal. it involved the creation of sea corridors for the safe export of sunflower oil and fertilizers from three ports of ukraine, the agreement was primarily humanitarian in nature, famine broke out in many countries against the backdrop of a sharp rise in food prices, the countries of africa, asia and latin america were especially hard hit. however, at the end of october, russia

had to suspend participation in the agreement due to security attacked by drones in the sevastopol bay, the russian military managed to repel the attack, destroying 16 drones, however, 218 ships that participated in the grain the deal turned out to block these drones and , uh, underwater and aerial drones. they partially walked in the corridor along which grain is exported from ukraine, and thus they created a threat to our ships, which should ensure the safety of the withdrawal of grain, and to civilian ships that are involved in this. and we committed ourselves. to ensure this security, well, if you excuse me for the simplicity of the expression, if ukraine gets hammered under these courts, we will be guilty. we are 4 days later. russia resumed its participation. before that, moscow put forward a number of conditions, kiev gave

written guarantees not to use the grain corridor for military purposes, and at the un a promise to quickly persuade western countries not to interfere with russian agricultural exports, that is, russian grain and fertilizer will be exported in the same volumes as ukrainian raw materials from the united states and the eu continue to put obstacles won our fertilizers and agricultural products to world markets. we will take this into account when considering the advisability of extending the grain deal, an important role is played. the president played in this whole process turkey reje bardan. it was under his leadership. turkey has practically become the main beneficiary of the grain agreement, both in the economic sense, it is the purchase of cheap grain from ukraine, and in the political sense, turkey, led by erdo. we became the organizer of the peace process, it is worth noting that third world countries do not receive even ten percent of wheat supplies. the lion's share of exports from ukraine falls on ankara and the european union , african and middle eastern countries get

less than 5-7%, instead of wheat. ukraine has become to export more expensive raw materials corn, barley and sunflower oil, the beneficiaries of exports were turkey, italy, spain, the netherlands, china and egypt , while ports and sea routes were used to supply weapons to ukraine, therefore, the export of ukrainian grain should be considered from a non-economic side, and from a geopolitical one a month before the grain deal. this was also noted by alexander lukashenko, well, we figured them out quickly. putin and i discussed this problem. i say, don't worry there is no grain there as much as they scream and it's not about the grain. they want accuse us with you that we have arranged a world voice. we are such giants, what made a famine in the world began to understand? they just needed some other world-class problem to hang on us, both african and asian, that they are two dictators together. there they are doing what. well, i am glad

to welcome leonid slutsky , head of the ldpr faction, chairman of the committee on international affairs of the state duma of the federal assembly of the russian federation, in our program. good evening. to greet. and i know you are politics experienced decisive, so i'll ask you a question. perhaps even in some ways the toughest grain deal is most actively criticized by those who are as tough as possible in relation to the west towards ukraine against any compromises, speaking relatively speaking, voters in your party, if possible, and so to speak, and in their system of coordinates the very existence of a grain deal - it already looks like the defeat of the russian federation as a certain deflection in relation to the west tell me, please, because it appeared even in

lexicon, and such a phrase, a notorious political contract. incidentally, i am absolutely critical of this. but still, why is this a deal, including beneficial to the russian federation? let's not. uh, hope to make a mess someone criticizes. this is their business in our e, the party of sound people. we have a constructive opposition party. we must forget, and the final recipient. oh, this grain is another matter when unmanned aerial vehicles strike at the grain corridor, when the grain somehow, missile attacks are being planned along the corridor, and we had this information, of course. this grain corridor was closed. it threatened the ships. and it threatened the safety of the people, as

far as the grain deal should go. it's not, uh, a situation that, uh, should balance our uh. today we see destructive interaction with kiev on these issues. we will decide either on the fields of a special military operation or in negotiations, when kiev agrees to them again. do you remember that i am one of those four negotiators appointed by the president of russia from our side, which took part in negotiations with kiev for quite a long time, but then the ukrainian side, uh, stepped back from all the agreements reached, therefore, we do not need uh our relations today are extremely, destructive, aggravated with the nazi regime in kiev

we balance it with the fact that we stop grain deliveries to those countries that really need them, which are ours. and the population that we need to support, as well as all sorts of healthy people, so the grain deal will continue, yes hope, thank you very much, but i would like to clarify more. what is the impact of western sanctions against russian and belarusian fertilizers on the intensification of the global food crisis. it is no secret that the availability of fertilizers to overcome hunger is always higher. than the availability of supplies. it’s just that grains from the same ukraine or the russian federation are like in the famous parable that it’s wise to give a person not just a few fish, but a fishing rod. we, uh, we need to combine both the fishing rod and the fishes of the sanctions and restrictions, the number of which simply rolls over.

eh, absolutely. e does not fit with any sane approach. some time ago, uh, of course, until february of this year. as a member of our delegation to the general assembly, i addressed the russian delegation by general secretary antonio guttasha to the sound politicians in the world. e. i received more than 60 answers from the leaders of the country of the same gutters, and that sanctions should generally be sincere from today's realities. this is a vestige of atavism haitism. uh, today there is no world politics, we must build a balanced world architecture. me, of course, theoretically like uh, can be taken exclusively by decision of the united nations security council, we see completely different realities, more than 10,000 sanctions

are visible today, then against russia against belarus there are also enough of them, including uh against a company that work in the field of, e, production and export of mineral fertilizers, however , everything related to e. hmm import mineral fertilizers in, uh, those countries that need it. we, uh, have, uh, supply opportunities, and in this case, of course, because of the sanctions. here, uh, the mechanics are broken, this is so and there is no need to hush it up, but let's have a fishing rod and a fish. let's give to those who need it. i would like to ask one last question about your relationship. how do you assess the role of turkey in general, not only in grain? but in an attempt to find a way to resolve the conflict in ukraine, you generally know

turkey, despite the fact that we sometimes have somewhere sparks international sorry bilateral relations. uh has been and will remain our closest partner in terms of assistance to turkey and his personal experience of this president of turkey in e. not easy. uh, dossier of negotiations with ukraine. you remember that one of the rounds of negotiations took place in istanbul and erdogan even delayed flying a few hours later to uzbekistan in order to personally open this round. it seems to me that here it is necessary to say that the turkish side, e, tried to do everything possible to ensure that, when through the mediation of ankara, moscow and kiev found a common language faster and more fully. how much did it succeed? it's a matter of diction. this is a q question agree with you absolutely. thank you very much, let

's hope so, thank you leonid eduardovich for participating in the program. well, what are we moving on? next, i would like us to pay attention to our plasma, this is exactly what the grain corridor of istanbul looks like, and the extension of which was agreed upon. i would like to draw your attention to the fact that the guarantees of the implementation of the initiative were the united nations organizations and turkey ukraine naturally, she addressed, uh, partners within the framework of the initiative with a proposal to extend its minimum. for a year, including the port of nikolaev in it, because at the moment it has been extended for 120 days in one. what do you think, will the russian federation support this initiative? this is a purely speculative question, no one cares about their fate, all the sellers. its interests in this region, naturally the position of the russian federation is more sound, because these sanctions and

logistical restrictions. they lead to shortages and rise in prices, but turkey strengthens its influence in the region, receives cheap russian grain and creates it for itself. uh, energy hubs get energy cheaply. the european union is stuffing itself for feed at the expense of this deal and is trying to prevent it. uh, so, uh a new wave of migration from north africa means the united states of america is solving its own problems. ukraine, under the guise of this deal, firstly, earns money on exports. the rest is trying to deliver to himself, and the weapons of the sea by way of this goods products, about which disease is in place the fate of the poor, uh, she does not want to. it's learned that third world countries get as little as 5 finished. yes, and here i will give you a few examples so that you understand, firstly, if the fate of the african peoples worries, the territory larger than the territory of france is leased or owned by european

and american companies, all the grain that is produced there, and there is very high yields are exported to the eu and the usa and you do not supply them there. leave the grain there the united states spent two and a trillion dollars on the war in afghanistan over 20 years of the world e, the food organization e was not enough, and in that year $5 billion for the implementation of all its programs, which gave $5 billion to ukraine, 1.5 billion are ready dollars a month from the eu to allocate, so it's all speculation about this one deal. russia's position is clear russia wants to push through its interests to lift sanctions on the interests of sanctions. it means that their fertilizers get, of course, what russia's interests are being sold. well, let's agree with you that here at all mercantile interesting. come on, well done point over let's start with double standards. the west means that, before the start of a special military operation, all economists spoke to us, about european ones, that

a on a global scale, and russia's gdp is less than 3% and its weak, useless economy, if we isolate it now, will not suffer from this . no one just happened, everyone began to talk about the fact that it was russia that provoked the food crisis, that everyone is starving everyone is dying urgently sos, something needs to be done. this that's just about double standards. now , who is pursuing what goal here, and certainly russia also has its own mercantile goal. it lies in the fact that this year we have received 150 million tons of grain, which is 13 million tons more than last year . corn. we now cost exactly the same as it cost 3 years ago. it turns out that our farmers are our agriculture, really having no markets here sales and having such low prices, and are now

in a very difficult situation in order to get out of this . we need this corridor this corridor. it costs us dearly in all respects, because from the e ukraine of the black sea e three ports of ukraine to the bosphorus, russian warships escort the e, the vessel that transports the wheat. these are indeed quite large expenses, but we are going to pay them, in addition to philanthropy, which russia has never forgotten. and mr. slutsky clearly said this. we still want to solve this problem you rightly said how much turkey needs it, you know that turkey has overtaken italy in terms of supplying europe to europe with already processed grain products. now the main pasta makers are not italians, and most importantly, pasta turks, thanks to note, what mr. slutsky also said, the west offered russia in vita supplies of ammonia, which is also important to play a key one, which is worth offering something, and not only require very

fast, but here it is recycled. here are the ones that turkey is very good, unfortunately, you know, here the world is much tougher, so that there are no viewers . here we sit and discuss the poor africans would be poor, we would all rent our expensive cars, cottages of two or three thousand meters, which should be serviced by guards, and the kamunalki would move. no, that’s why let ’s all fight for national interests now, but our position is more sensible, i’ll explain it again. but these restrictions, artificial sanctions, they already worsen the unenviable position of these countries and the model that we propose. that's about what my colleague said, that is, it is more fair to eat today. you say it is wrong to eat a system today, but a system where the beneficiary is only the collective smell and, above all, the atlas-saxons. we want to decentralize this system to new centers. they were able to participate in the regulation of the global economy. that's the question. we have a question for alexander alexander well

, after all, it would be appropriate to assume that trust is still a guarantee of a real guarantor for ukraine turkey, we have already mentioned mr. erdogan and, according to many experts, a grain deal, but is also interesting because it serves in a general form as a running-in of a possible model for resolving the conflict in ukraine as a whole. we remember what a key role belarus played earlier and the minsk agreements, if they were implemented, would have prevented what is happening on the territory of ukraine today, turkey plays this role, how does alexander assess it? can this story be more global? this one of my last interviews was that i said that if you don’t do it, male, 2, then you will have to do minsk three, for which, in fact, he was later included in certain lists. here, although, in general, quite logical sensible things were said

with regard to turkey, of course, turkey acts as a guarantor of the guarantor, and it plays on the contradiction, that is, turkey now needs a world balance, that is, it is trying to play on the contradictions between the west and the russian federation on in this way it wins certain prospects for the future. that is, as colleagues said. yes turkey is becoming a local geopolitical player. in the middle east, without them, issues cannot be resolved with the help of this balance, which they are trying to create and influence the western world orders. dictating already definite terms. in certain niches regarding russia, first of all , this cooperation with the russian federation is beneficial for turkey, and they will guarantee it, because let's not. that erdogan will have elections soon, after all, in the twenty-third year, this is one moment, the inflationary component in turkey is very serious there about 80% inflation. after the sixteenth year yes, not an accomplished coup d'état. this situation drags on and the shatkovalka

changes sometimes. but nevertheless, it is closer to a stalemate, they need to show certain victories, receive a withdrawal to the budget and receive certain geopolitical horaces regarding the grain deal, as the guarantor and the redistributor have leverage back. we understand perfectly well what is happening now in a certain atlantic union . yes, economic cannibalism is taking place, that is, the united states of america, in order to stock up on fat to fight china in the future, is actually economically destroying its partners in the european union. well, just look at germany. look at the corporations at the companies that work there and that are americans. trying to get himself out yes? alexander thank you very much. what is the role, in your opinion, of the monopolization of a number of markets by large transnational corporations, here, and alexander recalled kargele in the rise in prices for production in

general. it is known that a large part of the same ukrainian grain is not exported by ukrainian farmers themselves, but by american corporations that buy the harvest cheaper and, in fact, manipulate prices due to the fact that they own elevators and a fleet. you know all world wars. take a look at history, it starts with the division of the sales market and begins with the economic crisis. what we are now with you. we are very clearly observing with regard to monopolization, which is going on all over the world on all fronts. she is obvious. we already now doubt that the united states of america will are considered as their allies, because the feeling that they decided to bleed europe completely, they force them to invest money in ukraine, and they force them to transfer all industrial assets to technological assets, and to lure a highly trained technological workforce to themselves makes it completely dependent on themselves. this is understandable. why do they need complete hegemony.

remember the meeting with mr. si e. the aunt sounded, and one president biden, says, about the so-called world, yes, the unipolar world is all says that there should be only a lot of the polar world and at the same time these are monuments. vadim, we now have the inclusion of voldemar coat of arms of a german businessman in the past deputy. uh, bundestag, germany waldemar hello good afternoon. and, of course, i know that you are directly connected with the business that you were engaged in. and you bought them in belarus with the export of kalina fertilizers and, again, such ones in belarus after the imposition of sanctions, the situation became catastrophic. tell us about it in more detail and in general. what is the motivation for imposing such western sanctions the motivation is the same, if you look at the basis of this

process, you have now outlined it for today's uh moment, we are in plan b sometime 4 years ago. i was in america and the conversation turned to measures to curb the development of russia and influence the western market. e, through military intervention - it didn’t work out then there was still a conflict in georgia, all these are small. uh, let's say provocative things and so on. this high-ranking official says, most likely, we will have to include a plan b. i see him now in my life plan b says we sacrifice our partner for our best interests. with one blow, we are destroying russia, and most importantly, we are stopping the development of china because 600 million are solvent buyers. china's economy, uh, forward 70%

of consumer goods, uh, bought chinese now, we are deprived of this opportunity thanks to the activities of the overseas regional committee, and thus we must pay tribute to their uh, strategic thinking and planning. well, it far exceeds the eastern concepts, about which i have repeatedly said, that it is necessary to sit down and create institutions, institutions to promote our ideological. i say ours because er and germany belongs to the european community of peoples. we are one continent and the fact that the american embrace is now pulling us out of this family. uh, we all feel very, very bad about this. i don't know how we will get out of this crisis, when 780 90% of pensioners have entered the process of complete impoverishment for years

. eh, i don't know but the plan of the americans, uh, 100% is being carried out before our eyes. well, i would like to draw the attention of the guests of our viewers to our plasma, the geography of deliveries of belarusian potassium, the place of belarus among the largest players in the potash fertilizer market, this is exactly what this picture looks like, that is, by imposing sanctions, the west is shouting that it wants to fight world hunger . but at the same time, he himself provides it with the question of how competition is on the one hand. our partners take advantage of this, they twist their arms and get cheaper prices for potash fertilizers enter into long-term contracts. even our partners are strategic friends. and, of course, our competitors are companies that also produce fertilizers that match them. there are markets, supply chains are changing, as a rule,

contracts are long-term, and we are losing markets. that's the problem. why today russia should sort out its military operation faster, because every month a military operation damages, smoking ends in our interests and the quality is not yes for belarusian potassium president of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko expressed his opinion, let's listen, please. today, they are already starting to call on the sly . let's do something. i say, please, come, take it. well, the squirrel will not be bent and will work. maybe we will sell less of these potash fertilizers in this volume, but prices have skyrocketed. and that is, we will provide our team with salaries and they will pay taxes normally. that is, in terms of money, you will not lose anything. indeed, now the grain deal has been extended for a specific period. and russian the federation rather has the right to demand

certain preferences for itself, but with regards to fertilizers, a ban on their export. can this problem be solved in the future under a global extension, for example, for a year of the grain deal? well , as far as i know, the official ban on the import and export of fertilizers has been lifted. the point is that anyway, unfortunately, yes, they insure. yes, yes, the logistics did not take off correctly, the president said, come. let's do new logistics. we must sit down at the table and contrary to all plans westerners to sit down and pragmatically talk about the formation of new logistics routes for finance and for the goods itself. i am ready for these negotiations. though tomorrow i'll fly down and we'll talk, and we'll line it up contrary to everyone, line up that you're fine with anyone there you have to say, right? yes

, listen, firstly, what i told you about, you understand the transport chains are built for decades, the contracts are long-term, why did they force them, then why did they blow up the northern streams? because in order to supply liquids to gas, it is necessary to build the infrastructure to the advantage of the investor. to build infrastructure for liquefied gas, if the contract is at least 20 years old, you see, they destroyed it today, they will build it. what is the problem. we must not drag out the military operation, and even this issue cannot be escalated, because transport and supply chains are being reorganized and flows are being redirected. we are losing, losing markets. today, our colleague said correctly in germany, and the anglo-saxons put europe in an uncomfortable position at the same time as a blow to their competitor to the european union, china and the russian federation, we are losing everything. so, when we come to our senses on the eurasian continent, well, with whom does he sit down at the negotiating table? well, what are you colleagues? say e, we already sat down on the 22nd at the negotiating table, when this deal was

concluded and what it led to, but sits down at the negotiating table and decides. uh, how to debug and extend this deal? how to enable new items? right now we are talking only about grains, and the embargo has indeed been lifted. with regard to rather fertilizer, but the logistics under the approval is not lined up. we are told that we need to sit down and negotiate, how can we negotiate with ukraine if, here, turning away from two steps away from the negotiating table, it begins to make state guarantors that you do not have a sanction, but you cannot pay. you cannot insure. you cannot insure. that's it and nothing works. all this is fiction. why is russia not happy with this one dozer? here at the moment, because technically sans is not there, but nothing is going after a short pause. we will return to our discussion, stay with us. he is authorized

to declare the grain deal has been extended for 120 days. we are talking about this in more detail waldemar. will the problem be solved as a whole and this is how aleksandrovna says that and with whom does she sit down at the negotiating table if no one gives any guarantees? and it is necessary to withdraw this process from the political state. i think that the time has come for bilateral negotiations between entrepreneurs who will definitely find solutions to these problems and financial flows and logistics streams. but if we keep waiting for the president of the country to sit down to talk with some of these someone will not act as a guarantor, they will not, because the philosophy of the destruction of the european economy will dominate, but if we sit down as entrepreneurs and agree about this, despite this, ships under the greek

flags sail and carry latin america is provided, because they went along the path of direct contracting and isolated politics from there, and therefore i appeal to your entrepreneurs. invite me to come with a delegation of german european entrepreneurs, and we will bypass the sanctions , moving clips. what does valdemar not understand? that tomorrow, uh, they will agree, and the day after tomorrow, damn it, it will be a political decision two ships are sinking by accident and the whole deal will collapse regarding russia wants negotiations and hints at them everywhere, but not much insufficiently strong, contractual position. now, when russia has a strong enough contractual position, people will negotiate. that's all, if the solution to this dilemma in your opinion, but of course, no one will absolutely guarantee nothing. uh, a certain state fits in. we have already said there, for example, turkey, yes, or others from the middle east who want to semi-participate in this and

see definitely their personal interest in their own development, some guarantees in e -competition, yes, in the free market, yes, which we like, like talked. let's just remember the free market formula. yes, that the free market breeds competition competition concentration, and monopoly is destroyed. the market is such an old old form, which must always be remembered, and we understand that in this competitive struggle, for example, for the same corporatocracy from the west, all means are good. why not apply sanctions against belarus , for example, any argument can be picked up? so you see, relatively speaking, there are corporations, yes, which we recalled, they have their own market share, the market is not indispensable, it is necessary to develop, that is, accordingly, a competitor appears, which wants to redistribute this share. of course, they will use state mechanisms, but they do not have all the possibilities for this. and how do they think? the right, for example, is the same united states

of america in order to conduct a sanctions policy for unfair competition, so the question here is not in guarantees, but in geopolitical alignments. we must understand that all these problems will be solved and will be solved soon. i will not say how much i do not know tactics do not own information, but what is the conflict in the asia-pacific region is overdue. and the americans, yes, and their allies. they will switch to the region they already have on the platform. everything, in principle, was prepared in order to conflict there. of course, they will not pull it all. and america will most likely go into the monroe doctrine, only it will not be the monroe doctrine as it was before, because the americans have a colossal external public debt, and all countries will unite economically with each other and dear colleagues will require them to pay these debts of 31 trillion us dollars in nothing unsupported paper. and let's also remember that now , in fact, for 100% of the us gdp, only 25% is

the real sector. everything else is virtual money. it's a soap bubble, so we're seeing a definite fire now. we see now all these encroachments of dishonest or competitive struggle with other countries. it doesn't matter. it's belarus. it 's china. it's saudi arabia. it doesn't matter. it 's russia doesn't matter. well, with everyone now , to enter into such a fight in order to somehow stake out, in order to gain time and delay the moment inevitably, but this moment of the inevitable can be delayed, but in any case, alexander will come well, look, i would like to go a little differently. eh, the scope to leave rather to theorize and philosophize a rather unusual question. i am sure that you are well aware of the theory of the great replacement. i will explain a little to the viewers that we are talking about the version that the globalist litas deliberately encourage migration to the european union and the usa from the states of the third faith and

logic. it is understandable, but such a crowd, after all, which is cut off from the roots and thinks exclusively survival is much easier to manage than white native european americans who know how to fight for their rights. and in this sense, the current food crisis is not just one of the means to spur it on. this is a new great migration of peoples, and you are right with the crowd that is looking for a piece of bread or a workplace, it is much easier to manage, but i want to tell you that my european colleagues will not be offended by me if we look at everything, but those slogans that are voiced during the protests in europe and they about the same increase our wages to demolish. uh, the cost of food baskets expand the number of jobs and no one ever in any of the

european countries and once in belgium found this only during their protests in recent years. for 4 months now they have articulated the reason stop pouring money into ukraine and imposing sanctions on russia, this is one such little cry. uh, all of europe with uh, lives with a position of rational choice. yes, we need to eat . we need to drink. why are they over this? they don’t think at all, and the worst thing is that there is not a single international organization left in the world that could act as some kind of guarantor just the other day, he lost his face in both the economic and political world, when they adopted a resolution regarding the arrest of russian assets and sent them, so to speak, to separation. thank god, there is no indemnity to god, but it would be better if there was an indemnity, because then the world was somehow concluded. well question. under what conditions do you present some kind of challenge to everything

to the world community, especially saudi arabia , to the arab emirates, which have their assets in european countries, that is, they must jump off at a run, run away and take their assets, because tomorrow he may adopt some kind of resolution regarding them if they take some wrong step in this political, but conflict between e. ukraine and russia, therefore, russia yes, you need to solve your problems with a special military operation. but it is no longer our problems that are at war with us. not ukraine is at war with us. nato mercenaries russia resists all for this colossus, not a single one, of course, within the framework of the union state, we feel this support, we understand and know it, especially in terms of the development of gdp, now, therefore, this problem needs to be solved by everyone, but there is no one to solve it, even international is a common problem, then then to say that these are our common problems, and i’m not blaming russia here, i’m talking about the fact that they say this

even at the level of our and your power bloc , the success of a special military operation depends, in principle, on the speed of its completion do you understand the future of the world and the integrity of the russian federation or not? and today. it's just that we all worry about how badly we eat. listen not so everything, no matter how big the apocalypse is there. well, we're not so good either. unfortunately, you understand, let's objectively look at this situation. we are with you today until february 24th. many were shouting there, they took out their hats and waved for 3 days. in kiev , they were waiting to meet, they received flowers in uh. in kiev, there are none, that is, it was a drunken assessment of the situation. god forbid everything would be fine, as generally justified the need for a special mechanism for the export of ukrainian grain. and if i understand correctly, the russian federation has never stated that it intends to simply block ukrainian grain exports, but we

are talking about the safety of civilian ships in the northern part of the black sea. i just want the viewer to understand this. and this requires a certain agreement, but, which we are actually talking about today, because if it were only from a trade blockade, well then moscow’s actions would hardly have differed from the blockade of cuba by the united states of america of course, you still understand that there is a military conflict in the region and it’s easy for civilian ships to get there and leave yes, from ports, for example, the same odessa yes and others, uh this is quite a difficult situation, because they can be fired upon. there are mines there, necessary, of course, then military-political guarantees, under which a ship of one state or another will allow itself to enter the port to load this grain and bring it out for this

of course, all these agreements were signed, but i emphasize again whether they can guarantee. i think they can't. and what will happen then to the ukrainians who live yes, but on the territory of ukraine about which the authorities do not care, because inflation works, this question also interests me. can i guarantee that i will return again , the turks will do everything in order to participate, in order to save face in order to balance between russia and the west, therefore. grain deal, well she'll always be under the threat of collapse. this is a logical question, of course, and i will pay attention to the plasma of respected viewers , this is exactly what the share of ukraine and russia in world grain production looks like. well, the data is such and significant enough to ignore, no matter how someone would like it to work. and now we are talking about a grain deal, we are talking about the format of some kind of cooperation that already exists between ukraine and

the russian federation, this is the main question. could this be a definite example of a format for finding synergies, finding compromises, and ending no here, uh, it's absolutely not worth anyone to have any empty illusions, because i repeat once again, and this deal was stopped for 4 1/2 days due to the fact that our patrol ships, ah. drone attacks that we managed to repulse, but we also forgot about another point. how many with this grain and with these here, and weapons were brought there by ships, and illegal ones including weapons, and she has several questions to ukraine, which are the first on migrants that you asked questions they are interested in migrants, but in managed migration streams to accept to carry out selection to take who is needed, and uncontrolled migration scares them, you know? yes,

these are the boats, why do they sink on the way to italy second? uh, so about the us and its role and the fact that we already said goodbye to them early. and what they have always done in the usa, i told you in the last program they staged a war somewhere, especially in europe they are interested. today. they will arrange provocations. in the black sea around the perimeter of the russian federation in central asia in the north caucasus use contradictions they are trying to draw in more now and it’s not a fact that the united states didn’t participate there, it’s not on purpose. from these missile hits, maybe today they have a task in europe to cut a more global conflict then axis. you are from europe again. so you say, there the financial bubble will go there real production. today you will drive a german car the shareholders will be the americans in this we must understand this threat of potentiality, i answer you 100% correct answer. write down the first in the negotiations will begin and the results of the negotiations will be signed only when one side has a decisive

advantage. today, neither russia nor the collective. there is no collective agreement between the west. ukraine looks to finish there, right? dear friends of the end of conflict negotiations ukraine and i, as i said before and tirelessly repeat that the conflict in ukraine will end when the conflict begins in the asia-pacific region. this is fundamentally they are being used now in order to firstly weaken the russian federation here, secondly, completely eliminate the economic and political ally of the european flagship economy in this way, yes, liquidating the european economy. they willy-nilly replenish the russian budget at the expense of the cost and excesses of energy resources. russia - it's balanced europe can't stand it, we understand that. well, just a colleague, very correctly noticed. yes, there will be, uh, german cars, but

american-made. now volkswagen yes , and others are beginning to transfer everything completely there their production, the americans accept it, then macron and schultz declare that the americans are unfairly competitive ba. just noticed that this is such an unfair competition. i would say that they somehow changed their minds. yes, after the forty-fifth year in uh, to embody the argentau plan, and now they are returning to it and quite a real plan, when there is the destruction of the european economy in order to get the participants in the discussion, i think our viewer will do it. those conclusions that he sees fit, well, finish our program. it seems to me rightly it will be the famous lines from johann wolfgang's faust . goethe's fleet is yours. charter, he is more powerful, he is right. no one will ask whose wealth, where it was taken and at what cost. trade and piracy are three types of essence of one authorized

to declare. grain deal paves the way for a big deal across ukraine we're going on a grand tour of belarus for sure. many have heard that the geographical center of belarus is located in this region. but not everyone knows that this is the only region. whose the name does not coincide with the name of the regional center a memorial sign in the form of a gate and 1067 is the date of the first mention of the city in the tale of bygone years by professional guides. they lifted sacks of grain and passed the beams to this beam. here are such

huge tongs, author's routes and interesting places. you know immediately by the cornflower blue domes of the architectural monument in this place grew up in the early 19th century ready. with us to belarus 24 48 chosen ones entered the game they never give up their strength is not only in the muscles, but also in character, of course, the heroes are ready for girlfriends, they dream of becoming as legendary as the heroes of greek myths. with victory, i want to be a high-flying bird. fire like this is my favorite poem

just because we are already rescuers teams. players will have to go through the most difficult test and compete for the main prize. exceptional abilities are very interesting to watch in the sports and entertainment show heroes on our tv channel. oh mom glasses, what a thrill, a good finger, a lot of confectioners, a lot of teams and our tanya took second place and you could say in one gram of chocolate from the first. and this is the smell from which you simply love, your

close friends tell you. oh what a sweet woman you are, it smells delicious. there, he says, they say the production unit, but it seems that somewhere the combine is called belarus with svetlana borovskaya on our tv channel.