alexander lukashenko spoke during the summit in yerevan, security issues are at the forefront today on the agenda of improving the csto crisis response system the world has ceased to be unipolar nato continues to advance. in the east. for our borders. this poses a real threat to countries that want to follow their own path on an independent foreign course, it turns out to be a strong pressure. increasingly, we are talking about the possibility of using nuclear weapons, the unchanging belarusian position should not be nuclear blackmail place in international politics will actively develop economic cooperation, found a scheme for the supply of goods in a bilateral direction , this was announced in damascus during a meeting of the belarusian delegation with the syrian government following the results of the signed joint documents. among them, the promotion of mutual trade, the document refers to the simplification of customs procedures, the organization of the road traffic system continues and

humanitarian cooperation next year belarus will receive 225 children from syria for rehabilitation in 5 years, about a thousand of them have visited belarus, it is not indifferent to what is happening in syria. as you know, at all international platforms we continue to take an active position aimed at comprehensively supporting sovereignty in the series and preventing interference in its internal affairs, and, as you know, we occupied firmly from the very first day. the conflict and did not depart from it is not ours. e, today we are ready for the most frank and detailed conversation on all issues, primarily concerning, of course, trade and economic sphere, and further development and cooperation was also discussed during the meeting between roman golovchenko and syrian president bashar al-assad. visit of the belarusian delegation headed by the prime minister. in syria completed

belarus continues the systematic development of cooperation with the russian regions st. petersburg is counting on the expansion of industrial cooperation. this was discussed in the government at a meeting with vice-governor kiril, poleakov. in general, according to the results of nine months, mutual trade crossed the mark of $1.5 billion, belarus actively supplies agricultural products to this market, there is a great demand for equipment amkodor increased exports this year by 300%, in order to strengthen its presence in the russian market, it was decided to build an amkodor trade and service center in st . petersburg. we are systematically implementing. uh, all our projects. here, uh, we have completed the transport reform, including thanks to the products of minsk enterprises, today we are discussing the modernization of the elevator facilities in st. petersburg, which needs to be replaced this year. we have a major update in petersburg e equipment for housing and communal services. it is also clear that much of this

technique. she is also a manufacturer. belarus racing sumo obstacle course and robots take part in all this in brest in 19 nominations. each of which has been identified brest tournament winners. gave a start to the fourth cup in educational robotics. throughout the academic year, its stages will be held in many cities of belarus, and in may the winners will gather at the republican tournament, which will be held in minsk. we have unique schools, unique clubs that are already actively exploring the russian federation and other foreign countries. and, by the way, they perform very well and take prizes, so even the indicators show that, well, we are probably one of the leaders

belarus on robotics. the 33rd international festival of contemporary choreography ifmc in vitebsk brought together the best teams. acquaintance with the audience took place the day before during the grand opening of the forum. among the jury of experts, eminent representatives of choreographic art, festival projects will be held at two venues of the regional center in the concert hall of vitebsk on the stage of the yakub kolas national academic drama theater participants and winners will be held on sunday. on the air of the weekly socio-political

talk show, on the merits today, on the eve of the dcb itself, which will be held on wednesday in yerevan, we will talk about the present and future of this organization about those problems and nuances that we need to know and understand judges kirill kazakov and alena surova and you , by tradition, can become participants in our discussion. here at the bottom of the screen is a qr code to point your smartphones and join the conversation. good evening. well, as alena already said, on wednesday, november 23, a collective security council will be held at the dkb. well, how to introduce, probably, such knowledge is small that the dkb is the six countries of the former soviet union, uh, the csto is a military-political union, and in fact, probably at the turn of the end of 2022, when a special military operation is underway in ukraine, when the troops of the united states

of america appear in lithuania more and, in fact, well, the grouping in poland is far from being defensive. and, most likely, offensive we need to talk about what this is about the monetary policy now, because if we had spoken, for example, 5 years ago, then it is quite likely that we would have conducted exercises together with our colleagues, which has repeatedly happened and, in principle, these political part of the union was not asked, because publicly military-political union so, let's talk about the political part, because it is definitely a military one. then take effect when the diplomats stop agreeing to sing. so you can start with the dkb now, uh, is it possible to say that this is an anti-nat, or nato is ours, because they say that there is, uh, nato, uh, the country, uh, that is leading this process, it is the united states of america that are actually satellites, but the csto is still presented as an alliance

of equal participants. well, i wouldn’t compare it with above at all, because unlike nato, which bombed yugoslavia hmm at least. yes, the csto does not engage in such operations and does not want to do so. rather, it is a force of deterrence and a nuclear umbrella. e for all participating countries, because we remember that everything was yugoslavia, and we know wonderful. why this was not done with belarus although there were 99 conversations in the 2000s , because there was a dkb. they were afraid to stick the nuclear umbrella here from the other side. we see that they are trying to check us now. these are the same missiles in a provocation of various kinds. we see that this weekend was generally the strongest such powerful informational pressure on us. look, uh, then they found some, uh, supposedly kgb agents in

russian uh, among russian prisoners, then they suddenly began to throw in that it’s like russia preparing terrorists. why play off inside the csto. so they understand that this is power. they know they're afraid of lettuce here, and i don't want to. here it is to unwind from the third moment. here, look, we have, er, there is a precedent of kazakhstan in january 22 . that is, we will often fulfill the political one. although they always and we still need to learn, the border of tajikistan and kyrgyzstan inside the road accident is a problem that they began to try to push our foreheads together. one gets the impression, as if. well, right quiet surface. yes god of grace between the allies, it is obvious that in principle we have problems, there is no silence. and it is not necessary to begin with this. it is necessary to begin with what does not exist in the world. union without the problems of such unions. no, there has not been and never will be the european union is bursting. at the seams of nato is a

soap bubble. i’ll explain why, in order to talk about the battery, it must be said, to understand nato, it’s a soap bubble, if today a war breaks out in europe, the americans will never fight for anyone, they won’t fight and they won’t fight. all this talk about the nato fifth amendment the fourth situation with the missiles, which everyone was discussing, is to clearly prove that biden woke up my words and immediately said that these are not russian missiles. and if there were four more missiles, he also said there, why did the united states never want and do not want to implement this amendment, they want us to be here . the poles themselves, let the lithuanians fight, let them fight, anyone, but they are not ready to substitute weapons and print dollars on machines, no more than a second moment. so why is the csto more effective than the csto - this is an exclusively protective organization. so i want to support peter, nato

unleashes wars. nato is changing regimes. nato violates international law nato aggression csto peace. remember how everyone recently clashed at the csto, that it didn’t resolve the situation with armenia and azerbaijan yes, doesn’t anyone understand that the dream of the americans is also from the glasses, so that here we grapple with each other, so that everyone quarrels within the framework of the collective security treaty, so that kazakhstan quarrels from belarus russia e. so she quarreled so that central asia would conflict even more with the russian federation in order to these contradictions will split and destroy us, so the main task we will be the third problem, but i must say, the most important thing is the effective organization of the csto once, the second it took place twice. thirdly, this is a guarantee of peace throughout the post-soviet space, just like the russian federation is a guarantee of sovereignty for all post-soviet countries, not only for belarus, now it’s possible

to treat it differently to a special military operation, russia in ukraine, someone criticizes him who - something does not understand does not accept. for god's sake understand one thing will not be russia will not have sovereignty, neither belarus nor kazakhstan nor a single republic of central asia, no matter how much they would like it not because they are bad not because they are not smart no one will give, therefore there is a contradiction. you are right, there are disputes. each country has its own. each country has its own national interests. there is a desire to solve something for ourselves, without interfering with any issues, so as not to spoil it, we see it, and therefore, as the reaction of different countries to the imposed sanctions, but this must be understood. absolutely a normal process, it must be resolved diplomatically through negotiations, and someone likes and dislikes the csto driver. now, in addition to russia, belarus and lukashenka personally, who openly speaks the truth at all meetings, including about problematic issues, but note one thing, no matter how

he is provoked. it does not allow splitting relations between countries. there are some contradictions here. he still does everything for reconciliation. even remember the last, when was the participation of armenia, azerbaijan, lukashenka, and that means russia, look how the president behaved wisely on the one hand. he answered very harshly, as it would seem, harshly on some questions, but on the other hand, if we analyze his answers. what are they talking about guys don't you see that they want to quarrel you? don't you see that they want to beat in the clinic between us even more in touch with us, and a political scientist from armenia if it's possible, mister bachelors, can you hear me? hello, mister robe. please tell me, uh, these disagreements that the csto are internal, how they are perceived from the point of view of armenia because, well, it seems to be, like, uh, this is a conflict between the edkb country and azerbaijan but from the point

of view of the armenians and from the point of view of the armenians who are part of the dkb. how is it perceived? well, firstly, i generally do not agree with the definition of internal conflict, that azerbaijan has already become a member of the csto. when it is possible to indicate some documents, unfortunately, i categorically disagree with the experts who spoke earlier. fulfill the obligations assumed voluntarily, not by force, within the framework of the charter of the tkb and other fundamental documents. i have a question like this, but i’m just guided by, uh, the speech of our president, which was at an extraordinary summit on the cst, when he said that after all the issue is in the caucasus if it is resolved in russia if there are two presidents, armenia azerbaijan meet in sochi and if president putin acts as a moderator of this conflict there, perhaps

it can be solved in a way that is not involving, for example, the european union's involvement of america in nato, that is, or maybe a little bit earlier in september, against a sovereign internationally recognized territory. the republic of armenia is committing aggression in the occupied tens of square kilometers of the country, members of the csto, armenia, according to all the rules of the documents established by vtb, seeks help in case of aggression. against her, from the side of a member of a non-organization, against this background , to think that, well, the mission is headed by the secretary of the plant. azerbaijani troops left the territory assistance to armenia mr. bachelors, see the question here. look here we are now discussing what will be discussed. i perfectly understand the emotions of our armenian colleagues, moreover, armenia was a brotherly country, belarus will be a brotherly

side, but they must understand nato and the european union is interested in there being a war and everything they will do. no matter how much they appeal to nato, the european union, the united states , their dream has just flared up, so that armenia and azerbaijan clash for 10 years in order to weaken russia. this must be clearly understood, and in why lukashenka is right. we are behaving very correctly here. here are all the emotions, we understand, the only way for there to be peace is armenia azerbaijan russia, that's what lukashenka says to sit down and agree, there is no third way. everything else is a war, a war that will last a very long time, nothing good. what does armenia expect from the summit to be held in yerevan ? unfortunately , i don't expect anything serious to happen. it is accepted that they want to have a zone of

tension and agree with this against russia, but the question of who is the tool for creating this tension. it serves azerbaijan, which is an ally of the nato member country turkey, and in this, i therefore wanted to say that a lot will depend on the organization on whether it can become a real military-political union, as, for example, at least with all the minuses of nato i i agree that nato is also not an ideal organization. yes but unfortunately about dkb it is necessary to grow and grow in order to grow to the level of nato, or it will be such a mix of pass and interpol. here's one. yes, we will only deal with police functions, some kind of fight against crime, everything else and the purchase of weapons in russia at bent russian prices, and it will not be possible to read this war by a political union, so katya odkb to me. now armenia is at such a crossroads and is one of the most interested countries in order for it to become a real military-political union, for the power component of this union to develop so that the parties members of the organization were sure

that no one would have thoughts. e such a thought in attacking the country a member of the dcb. being sure that other countries and organizations will instead look for reasons not to provide this assistance, unfortunately, yes, thank you for your opinion. thank you. we will return to you during the program. andrey ivanovich is. what to add , the biggest mistake that a military man can make is to underestimate the enemy of nato - this is a serious organization nato is an organization with very large military potential, and with very strict discipline within the organization. this is the first second united states of america and are preparing to fight in at least two tvds. this is the european theater-action and asian, of course, first of all they will try to do this if it comes to the great howl. by the hands of its allies and partners for europe, nato is creating similar

organizations in the east, but it’s not necessary anymore, that is, they have their allies japan south korea australia new zealand india is already included there and therefore say that the us will not intervene to fight themselves. i can't either they will they want the american soldiers to yes, yes, i hear they are fighting. i would like to point out, well, a few of those uh, positions and moments. well, firstly, uh, not one country that became part of the csto was going to. it didn’t plan and didn’t say that the organization would be an anti-nat. this is an organization that solves its military-political tasks within the framework of the csto, the parliamentary dimension is

exclusively political. measurement, and csto countries e-e on the eve of the session of the general assembly e. the un always meets in new york and holds conflict consultations, checks their positions and agrees on support in various issues. i emphasize the political component. tell me this is going to be a meeting. after all, before it, diplomats worked absolutely, a very serious preparatory e. work second moment. in a discussion with our expert from armenia, i would like to emphasize that the republic of belarus has always behaved very clearly. covered and decent csto, and our president, he always emphasized this, so there is no need to be offended by us, no need to be offended. now is the moment of truth, therefore

certain problems and certain issues have become aggravated, and we must speak frankly to each other in the eyes, but now, in comparison with how it was several years ago, as i see it, and new challenges appear, new requests appear that we we also hear from our armenian expert that the comfortable time that used to be now, many questions and decisions need to be made much faster, but i wanted to to emphasize the third point of azerbaijan, the armenian conflict is a bilateral conflict. and here is an attempt an attempt. e one of the parties to bring it into ours. when we talk about the fact that the countries are now uniting in a single bloc, obviously they will not survive at this time. everyone is looking for an ally with us, in principle, we are shoulder to shoulder. we

are accustomed to realizing that in which case we will support each other, our military constantly conducts together and so on, when and as i understand the position of our armenian friends, when they see a threat, a addressed to them, they count on the support of their allies, but they do not receive it in the form in which they would like . now it has become something more, and on paper. yes, according to some basic agreements , it does not comply. we simply can’t, we don’t have the tools to behave the way the same armenians would like. well, in general, being offended in politics is not constructive and losing the other side. i think that this is the situation that is being discussed, yes, uh, it is being discussed within the framework

of the charter that exists here in the akb and all the necessary steps are being taken, including the trip of the csto secretary general. well actually working experts are making specific proposals. and uh, the republic of belarus has long been saying that it proposed how to act, what decisions should be made about this. the head of state spoke about this so that our armenian colleagues would like a clear answer. and so, e, so that our armenian colleague understands everything that we are doing now within the framework of the csto is aimed at extinguishing the conflict, and not inciting any sharp movements, any sharp statements, or now, if our president behaved differently, russia would behave. in a different way, this will only inflame the conflict between armenia and azerbaijan, our president and belarus

have always occupied this composition, so that there is peace and a second remarque. why should a colleague understand me? i agree with him nato is a serious rival. i will never tell. something not today's rival the most important, who now has both weapons and millions of dollars. i said about something else that they still want to always fight with proxy. here in ukraine they succeeded. so that they were instructors there. mercenaries, but ukrainians, ukrainians , fooled, fought for their interests with russia, that's what they want, the same thing they want in europe. why poland is being analyzed, why will poland have 300,000, an army, after some time? well, poland itself will not do everything at the expense of america. why do they want lithuania to molitizi- militarize our bitterness stuffed. you say, why did everyone start criticizing? china that china did not strike when the secretary of state sang there, so it was the

americans who would have dreamed of war. yes, they want to, and they supplied weapons there further, andrei petrovich, from a military point of view. yes, we argue a lot here about the effectiveness or inefficiency of the csto. here are our viewers dead block. well your point of view from my point of view. first, i can kind of agree with some of the speakers before me. some in front of me with some. as they say not ready to agree due to the fact that it is unconditional. it is necessary to rise above the problem of what is happening in armenia today by and large. yes , this confrontation between azerbaijan and armenia is not a problem today. it has deep roots. but why exactly this problem arises today, first of all, we know that a special military operation is taking place today, by and large. she's going according to plan. well, with a little twist. let's put it this way, yes. here, respectively, unleashing the conflict and stretching russia in different regions. you can by and large

influence it, both politically and economically, that is, in fact, this will lead to even greater isolation. what kind of insulation? well, firstly, we know that, uh, azerbaijan is very close and in fact one state two peoples two one two states together with turkey this is turkey today. this is a very serious player in this region. and of course, if this player steps up against the russian federation today, it will bring very , very serious consequences. only political, not only economic, but above all to the military, this is the strongest state that has a serious fleet, which today is actually the second army, in the nato bloc uh-huh and the question of creating a turkic world. today is very sharp and therefore, in my opinion. that is precisely the decision of the political aspects at this moment. he is very, very important. well, you see, i did not specifically say at the beginning that the csto is a

military-political union, and for sure, now it is becoming political, well, in first place, because what if the presidents meet to talk about what is happening, and not the defense ministers, relatively speaking, because, well, the plans here are real yes, these arrows, which draw clearly, but the political decision is still the main one, of course, but then if we go further, then turkey is not just, as they say, the founder or successor of the turkic world. these are, first of all, the states of the nato bloc, and here, i don’t completely agree with those who say that the united states will never enter a war in order to to really kill the i of the concept of awareness. listen to this in order to understand the concept, you just need to look at their main operational-strategic operational documents, where everything is clearly spelled out. at what stage, when they have something, then they, from the year 17 of the seventeenth year, they are already preparing for a large-scale war according to all documents. it is

going on, uh, it is going on a limited scale on a regional scale. it is not yet large scale. well, it is precisely the unleashing of a large-scale conflict that is the most purpose. the only thing to deter nuclear weapons is a nuclear conflict, so that there is no only thing to contain, if there were no nuclear weapons, you are right, it was already blazing. of course, the whole look turned out. look, they say, you are not a dead bloc in kazakhstan, you are not a dead bloc, they worked, they worked, and in fact, uh, the result turned out to be positive, because today the presidential elections were held in kazakhstan yesterday, when we get the results of the presidential elections today. this is a political component to you. and you already know, turning around back to the events of six months ago. yes, 9 months have probably passed, but it seems like it was a few years ago, but this hmm decision and this operation in kazakhstan, it was more military or more political. i

create points of view, i can say the following, that our contingent from the republic of belarus performed a purely military function ; here is the arming blocking. here is the implementation support there behold, the arriving troops. here but any issues related to restoring order in the country are not providing assistance to uh. e. patrols, the streets of our servicemen did not accept and did not accept the servicemen of the entire continent of my creativity, who arrived there, therefore we arrived here, took the facility under guard and thus released the unit of the armed forces of the republic of kazakhstan so that they could help with the internal authorities to cope without a contingent of rest, here are the kazakhstani colleagues themselves, after all it's political. i think that it was necessary to demonstrate the determination and readiness of the strength of the dkb means. you make that decision and demonstrate. the world that we are able to

help our neighbor sing, well in terms of a political solution. yes, a trip to the state secretary of the csto to the border between azerbaijan and armenia, after all, is akin to the introduction of a peacekeeping contingent. yes, ours didn’t shoot there, but the appearance of a political, well, relatively speaking, decisions on the appearance of the military in kazakhstan and the decision of the political appearance of the head at the dkb on the border. after all, they are related. let's first, let's see, a colleague from armenia spoke about the border about some escalation in order to determine whether it is necessary to introduce a contingent or not, it is necessary to monitor the investigation and identify what is happening there? let's be frank. here, within the framework of the csto. this conflict could be resolved because until 2000 azerbaijan was a member of the body. yeah, they were offered the minsk group was a model of how to do it, and the president of belarus talked about it

and the president of russia why are these seven districts that no one lived there? why not take this process and do it ? no, armenia recognized and most likely will recognize the territorial integrity of azerbaijan and our task here, if not the csto, since this is not a conflict within the csto is to ensure the implementation of those november agreements, which, by the way , both azerbaijan and armenia assumed obligations and therefore, our task here is a to preserve the territorial integrity of azerbaijan without military conflicts b to ensure. uh, security for the armenian ethnic population on the territory of azerbaijan so that they are full-fledged citizens. and azerbaijan and you open the border

, demilitarize the border with azerbaijan and turkey and make a normal transit. armenia today suffers the most from its sometimes selfish actions, when it thinks that it will decide something in this way. she's nothing doesn't decide. she has two borders closed. she loses a lot of money on transit. well, there is one more important thought. the fact is that in what way the dkb differs from us, the dkb does not violate international agreements, which means that they do not violate international law. about what when he allegedly dreamed about the situation with kazakhstan, what we were talking about now, when the legally elected power asked about it. yes, unfortunately nato intervenes in conflicts when they are not asked to do so, who asked them to come to iraq in violation of its resolution, who asked to intervene in syria the legitimate president asked to be bombed, too, no one would ask when we criticize. this is not enough of this important thing. someone. maybe he wants

you to act like nato in violation of international law so no, this is our strength, not weakness, so that we even observe sacredly. even if they do not comply, but we are humanly morally . in the international world, everyone is watching us. they see that we don't betray, that we don't cheat, that if we do something, it fits. uh, on the right it requires the people of these countries where they come csto, therefore, everything is legal with us, therefore, when they say the csto is weak, the csto does not work as it should. and how should one act to unleash wars? what did this lead to in the middle east. my colleagues will confirm that they hate americans. now they are 20 years old, their 30s are deceiving. they deceived cancer, deceived afghanistan, deceived syria, who believes them no longer believes them even their allies, who once saw the kurds. how many they were deceived in iraq they said, we have made our own state, where is the kursk state. hmm in anticipation of each

csto summit. well, someone constantly prophesies that one or the other will leave. ah, organization. yes, and so, when pashinyan convened this extraordinary online summit, which, by the way, can anyone explain, in general, why was it necessary to gather online so urgently and communicate with each other? he is reacting in terms of the policy of soz diplomacy. this summit. it's already here too. right. yes, of course, it is absolutely. so uh, i mean we don't have to pick up. here this one thrown to us by thousands, that there are some very serious ones in the organization. uh, contradictions, that it is allegedly falling apart, that someone is going to leave no the republic of belarus has always supported the csto and will support us next year as chairman. i am sure of this organization, we have always, when

presiding, we have always strengthened this military-political uh, the union is therefore, and the convocation of the summit, well, each country has the right, within the framework of the charter, to request to request, uh, such a meeting. you know, basically useful. uh, meetings like this. discussion, but very important. what decisions are made, and the decision must be prepared, as they say, bilateral yes, a misunderstanding and a grater of individual states. uh, they still can't leave our tight circle. well, colleagues have already said that the most powerful thing is to ensure the security of the military security of each of the states. e. the same armenia yes, you can understand the emotions and you can understand the claims, but she is one too. it makes no sense for her to go out because of the dkb. and no

matter how now tajikistan and kyrgyzstan are not looked towards the kgb after the last conflict, too, they are on their own. in general, they will not provide their security, so the organization , in my opinion, has the potential only to strengthen for collapse. i do not see any new level of cooperation to go. maybe we really don’t have enough tools today to cover these security needs and those of all members. i think the tools are all created. and we really have a squatting ahead, and belarus in dtp we know that our country has never formally applied to the work of the organization, initiatives are constantly being put forward, serious deep initiatives. even on may 16, when there was a meeting, the heads of state of the state security and the president of belarus issued a number of very serious, er, initiatives. and most likely, during our sitting, it

will just happen. uh, the possibility of implementing these initiatives, and given that not everything is going smoothly in the organization, then, most likely, belarus will have to make some specific decisions. maybe even a difficult decision to carry out first of all, as the initiators of these decisions, andrey ivanovich let's understand. here, as if the question now we will return to our expert from kazakhstan already. revenge in general external pressure on the member countries of the state security committee armenia kyrgyzstan kazakhstan tajikistan what is it like? that is, is it there, here we are talking about armenia yes, and it’s possible, sometimes such a story happens that, uh, isn’t it always hmm, maybe this is really an internal problem of armenia, but there is no influence of america and europe, as it were you know, we are looking in the wrong direction, but a year ago we said that the most dangerous region is central asian, because it was not clear to afghanistan how it would be led, but a year later it

turned out that it was the eastern european region that was under the most powerful pressure . this is belarus and part of russia, which is located here. this is, first of all, yes, armenia, but armenia is such a us withdrew from afghanistan. yes, in order to bilateral yes, the two sides there in the external pressure is hard to say. and here we are really come under this pressure. i , too, aleksey sergeevich spoke about poland about militarization. poland and here, too, one must be very careful. it is not necessary to look at these 300,000 servicemen anymore. i’ll explain why how many populations we have, how many population posts, when there are 300,000 in poland, they will only catch up with our belarusian level in terms of population, and look at the americans. they are already setting up permanent bases there. they are warehouses with weapons and equipment. with a supply of ammunition, fuel and lubricants and other other ports airfields. all this is being prepared. look at this. we will not see something more serious behind our neighbors. let's. let's

alexey sergeevich our expert from kazakhstan tatyana viktorovna mormontova tatyana viktorovna joins us question. e like this. here. tell me, please, the attitude towards the dkb in the first place after the january events in kazakhstan is the csto a savior or the csto organization, uh, which simply helps uh on the world stage? so. and tell me, please, i can hear you normally well. i lost some sound. you now hear me. yes, yes, let's repeat the question again. so, look after the january events in kazakhstan, the csto is a savior organization, or a lifesaver on the world stage. well, you know, i don't quite like asking for the term organization, but here it turns out that

kazakhstan was really turning into a difficult situation into a difficult situation, but this is by no means a lifesaver. we acted according to international standards. and here it is necessary to distinguish between the concepts of the world, sanding devices and ps building and worldbuilding, we asked for help in just the same security functions. uh, to release parts of, uh, first combat readiness, that's really the problem. and now the competent authorities are really working with this, which are increasing, uh, increasing combat capability, uh, the number of units that are able to give an adequate adequate adequate response to well , any actions, and at the moment when kazakhstan asked for help from the design bureau, it was clear that those units of primary combat readiness that we have there may not be enough of them for astana and

alma-ata, it’s clear that, uh, the situation was the most difficult in alma-ata, but i was in astana, i perfectly understand, i saw and knew that situation, and uh, the dkb army allowed me to transfer units from astana and start the cleansing process. remember, it was in january that many people said that they say the csto would enter the territory of kazakhstan and not leave, they say there were such fears. how did you perceive this situation? uh, there were such views, i can say that just the same in january developments. and i've commented on the same answer many times. e answer, for example, to the same question for the kazakhstani media, i can say that we constantly clarified this issue, huh? we told the public and fearful people that there is no threat to national

security here. and here we need to, uh, give the opportunity, uh, to the military to do their job. to do this, we need help and support tatyana viktorovna, from outside, for example, armenia has some expectations, for example, from the fact that the csto will provide an opportunity to protect in belarus due to the fact that we are still in many ways a peacekeeping platform, both for the armenians of the azerbaijani conflict and for the russian-ukrainian one, and for kazakhstan. what does this battery itself mean or does it mean nothing? well, first of all, one cannot in any way say that it does not mean anything, again we see that the level of instability in eurasia today is unprecedented, therefore, it is necessary to use any mechanisms, any opportunities, any multi-level, multi-speed processes to in order to stop the inertia of destabilization, therefore it is really important here what will happen within the framework of the csto, any important processes

that will give, well, the slightest chance to appease. uh, that very unstable situation. thank you very much, that is, viktorovna, in the eurasian space, the key phrase that the expert said, and with this phrase it all begins, who is interested in peace in eurasia, only we, because we live here, the same applies to europe, who is interested in having peace in europe the world we are, because we are next to why europe? i say when you asked the question, if an external fact, if there are actions in the fucking post-soviet space, of course there is and will be with one goal to blow them up from the inside, so that there is a belt of instability around russia, no one interferes with any intermediaries from the west in talking about peace for other purposes in central asia, this conflict is even more to make any intermediaries of the west reconcile ukraine to russia, this is just a war blazing these words of the president, so that, for example,

ukraine is russian, this question ended, how he said. it can be wanted, only in one case, if ukraine were independent, and it could conduct direct negotiations. she can't have no independence. the same goes for whether they like central asia or not, they should understand. we want them to be calm, because if they flare up, then it flares up with us, and the fact that now this is the most unstable region has been said absolutely a lot about the fact that our nato colleagues are preparing everything is written in them, as in but there. yes, when, why, and why, obviously, they are not one year and from no angle considered the possible development of events, i have a question. and what we, sergey anatolyevich, as our military, in principle, set up, we understand that nato is most likely, and they set up an aggressive offensive for us correctly. but this operation, or what

? what kind of defensive about what well, listen europe blew up in europe the military was set up for what within the framework of the csto and set up? when we performed the task, we clearly knew that we have certain rights and powers on which we perform responsibilities no other more advanced functions of authority, no one gave us. here is the first. it was the first such task - the creations of the republic, belarus outside the country. it was the first time again. we arrived, studied the situation, and then only in cooperation, when you leave, there is no return. upon arrival, well, in fact, the task was clear, but the learning was here, it seems that you had a situation, but worked out in the exercises. no. we regularly conduct these exercises and representatives of the armed forces are always in them take part and practice math. she was somewhat similar. well, there, usually,

the topic implied that some state invaded the territory of some state from the bkb countries and we provided assistance. here there was a slightly different internal conflict, but nevertheless , the issues of introducing a grouping were worked out. and then the question of immediately withdrawing it from there is being worked out, and not just arriving and staying there at the end to the end always with questions of such a grouping to one or another territory the questions are worked out immediately, the order is planned, so we had various kinds of exercises and are now going through the exercises. they all have very different themes, depending on which state on the territory there they all gather and, therefore, hone their bodies for the situation. here, uh, what is more emphasis on protection, of course, of course, always the question is to protect the territorial value, either of one's state, or the state, than it is, as it were, the protection and liberation of the territory within the boundaries that they are. no further development

events are not needed, only 30 years of phyto their territorial resources have pumped, we have their territory. why do they have nothing gas, no oil, no shit. why do we need them? and they are constantly looking at our territory. therefore, we always defend ourselves, it seems that an armed conflict is inevitable. but i mean, our territory knows somewhere. you're probably right. on the one hand, today, if we look at the two blocs that we are considering, this is nato with the center on the one hand. well, let's say the center of power in in washington, the united states and the second bloc is a military-political one, it is a csto with a center of power in moscow and the russian federation. based on this , it is already easy to understand that the fate of our bloc, primarily an accident, is decided in the course of a special military operation. if something does not go according to the plan that we spoke about above, then no one

will be with the weak. this is the law, this is the law of politics, this is the law of logic, this is the law of life. if i missed the body, then accordingly we know that the flock is moving to to another, so the collapse of this bloc can inevitably occur. on the other hand, if, after all, a special military operation achieves its goals, which, well, are quite complex and philosophical, let's say yes, then the bloc will not collapse under any circumstances. yes, it will weaken, and irreparable consequences will occur, but at the same time, the bloc will maintain its stability. now a colleague. here he compared nato and contrasted it with the dkb. but in general, utkb, uh, our nato colleagues somehow perceive or they have already written off, but they have all the emphasis and their own interest.

probably, looking at china, they consider it the main rival and the main opponent. and they say with us already. well, everything is clear. they want to deal with russia, and then with china it may be that they don’t bet, and if they didn’t count, there will be an opponent lately. and for them it is the center. and i also want to hold a colleague. he said very important words to the whole world. now not only the post-soviet space is looking at the special military operation of russia, the middle east is looking, africa because this is their chance to get rid of colonial dependence, if they see that russia is able to defend its sovereignty, its independence, the independence of the post-soviet countries, because what are you right about, if russia collapsed, they would not exist. that's what they don't understand. there are some. here in these countries, so that andrei ivanovich is addressed from russia, i repeated it once again, yes, about russia to colleagues. well, let's see the documents, and the first is a strategic

concept over which was adopted in madrid in june of this year, russia is marked there, china is marked there, and the us national security strategy, which was adopted literally only in october. russia china us national defense strategy which was adopted a little later by russia and china correctly we are talking about russia being considered as china's possible allies china - this is the number one goal of the dkb wire. well, russia csto. russia belarus - it's like a single, probably perceived as a whole. but uh, one more thing i wanted to point out. we have never, in principle, considered in dkb, so as an adversary, moreover, we have been cooperating for many years, belarus, russia and other member countries, wkb. with nato, an employee through interaction or held a joint event and again let's return to the event, which was may 16, why i

spluttered across the city, get ready for a new system. listen, i wanted to tell you this morning. on tv channel belarus 24 good

evening on the air panorama studio ekaterina tikhomirova i am the main topics of this day through solidarity and cooperation towards peace and security in the wake of the rest summit in yerevan when the sanctions package twirled at the throat of tourism and business, how spain survives