speaking russian from the other side, that is, for example, the poles porsche is a country of 30 million people, that is, they can still be killed there and killed. it’s not necessary to think that tomorrow they will completely run out there, even due to heavy losses, that is, they have a larger resource that russia cannot spend, there are conscripts mobilized somewhere on the approaches, as they say, and so on, that is, people . that is, let's say russian commands. well, they are still trying to save people, the president announced to us that, as he said, there will be no more speech to talk about the dismantling of power structures in ukraine, that 's how the operation began, it will be blown away by the overthrow of zelensky, we will put some new leadership. and let's say it will be some territory of russia. he said that russia today is already ready to fight for destruction. that is, if a certain threat is created to the regions of russia, for example, because we do not understand about belgorod, what we are now seeing about kursk. well, then, apparently, there will be some kind of asymmetric russian response, that is. well, if they can no longer somehow control the territory ukraine, then they will inflict some kind of massive strikes already, without conducting a special operation. but i took some more large-scale military operations . that russia has everything for this, do we need

such a development of events, but, probably, this is still some worse option from what could be, that is, or the hostilities continue, as now with a certain parity, that is, no one has a clear advantage. that is, if you want to advance, you must lose people and leave them. that's like firewood in a firebox. that there is ukraine can do it. here they are quietly advancing there somewhere, somewhere there are fortified areas. they are kept there. here in donetsk, for example, somewhere they are even advancing, that is, such a variable success, our viewers do not need to think that there is a collapse at the front and everything else. well , this is a matter of losses and the question is that if we can not achieve today, these combat missions to fulfill them, then we need to achieve something, not just by peace negotiations. yes, it's all the time negotiations about some concessions. here is transit fertilizers. here is the supply there logistics. here are the ships , something else, and that's all, of course, it is not taken out in the public field. that is, we can only guess about it more or less. well, again, you know, they do n’t play cards with cheaters, that is, what prevents, for example, ukraine that we are doing something there,

so then they throw russia in this agreement, how the president was amazed, and then a rocket arrives in kiev and we are surprised. from something they flew in, like, the crimean bridge was not blown up. nothing happened there. and apparently this is the answer for non-compliance with some agreements, that is, ukraine, it follows such tactics that negotiations are just to drag out time, so that lexus recently poroshenko that, yes, it was a good document, but i was not going to execute it. and we just had to transform. here, if necessary, they will concoct 10 more such good documents for you and will still submit it with pomp to make you look weak. russia has come to bow to us, and we are already setting conditions for them, as a strong side. although i repeat on frunze. it's all not so, but the question of russia is ready. there today put 100.000 people 150.000 there 200.000. why do you remember the first world war there, when such an oppositional phase was already going on? yes, yes, yes, in the west without variables and questions. what was it? what state will stand? here the german empire is either ours or an ally, because everything was staggering like that, there was still running around as a spaniard and there was no advancement in france, but there was a collapse already

in the states themselves. here, someone will show great strength here, in fact. we have a great the past, in which we always beat all this western, bastard. we have a great present , we were called by all the good ones, as interlocutors to a feast, and our president is equal in size with them. and we have a great future, growing warriors of the military-patriotic club of granite - today celebrated the first anniversary, there is someone to beat the arrogant enemy mugs, and will continue to be. it was done a lot of children matured. the children gained confidence and became friends in the team.

bench shooting practical shooting and hand-to-hand combat, and already for the weekend. they are more pay attention to military subjects such as general military regulations, drill training, disassembly and assembly of weapons, fire training. we retreated in silence for a long time, it was annoying to fight. the old people were waiting, grumbling, why don’t foreign commanders dare to blow up their uniforms in a winter apartment? and the russian bayonets i thought hard in the cannon, i'll treat you. wait a friend, brother, misha, what’s the trick here, perhaps we’ll go to battle to catch the wall at salvation on our heads for our motherland. a day to save them the flying french moved like clouds and everything on our redoubt

lana has colorful dragoon badges made of ponytails . all flashed before us all visited. everyone was ready. tomorrow there is a new idea to fight and stand to the end. here the drums crackled and retreated normally. even looking at their older comrades who are directly serving, they want to be like them, and even if you talk, uh, including with the girls who we also have in the club. they all want to connect their future life with serving the motherland, in uniform. may i be so rich and lord, among

besson i will do i can. as long as you have to thank the shore.

my name is alexander vladimirovich pashkevich. i am an actor of the belarusian state youth theater of the honored team of the republic of belarus , the leading stage master. i would like to talk, of course, about the theater. i would like to talk about the repertoire that goes on in the theater in general. e about the art of the theater. let the cinema talk about life, about the conditions under which the cinema theater exists , because theater and cinema in general art is a private life and one cannot share the other. and so on this topic i would like to piss. hello

, you are watching the program. and today alexander pashkevich is our guest. good afternoon. hello alexander, the other day on facebook you posted a photo with the signature of a children's writer. i haven't played yet. can you tell me what you are talking about. this is a fictional character or a real person, most likely fictional this little tiny role project is called, in my opinion, a perfect fallacy. they called me and asked me to play. as they said to write or in fact it turned out that it was not for children a writer, but a compiler of textbooks. well, the writer, yes, and the whole role was that it was necessary to give a lecture on how to teach

active passive and interactive e, and the stage is absolutely tiny, tiny, but he is a lecturer, so in the auditorium, among them, the main characters are central who have their own life going on, and not only come, look at each other there . here, but i'm at this time, so i'm talking about this interactive re. you suddenly found out that that text is that monologue, which they gave me, it is simply not enough for this action to decompose, and the director just has so little text right off the bat. so, forever, the main interest for me was what i said, the text that was here, which i conscientiously learned as a decent artist. so, well, then i had to improvise and talk about interactive learning, about which i, well, heard something from somewhere, while there was a pandemic and somehow studied somewhere. and i'm in some uh terms. how i did it, but, in my opinion, it turned out and nothing like this role.

well, i always mark some roles, no matter how small or big they are, anyway, these are roles, because, well, there are no small artists, as you know, so i sort of mark for myself. yes, i note for myself alexander that you do not rely on screenwriters in modern directors to prepare here for filming and even for small roles. yes, something is honored peek. these, probably, it is necessary today, i had a presentiment, it was that it would be so, that i understood that i was not called to a central role there, through or still some i understood that something would happen. and perhaps, perhaps, this text may not be enough, so i have some kind of approximate plan for myself, what i could talk about, in addition to the main text, i sketched it out and it turned out that i had a correct premonition. do you have a favorite children's writer? as a child , i read quite a lot, since my mother was a teacher of russian language or literature. she gave me all sorts of books. well, is it possible to call

alexander sergeevich pushkin a children's writer? you can, of course, have amazing fairy tales, then, of course, i would put it in first place, because everything that is written in verse is amazingly long, it is easy to read and interesting. well, i really love chukovsky korney hmm chukovsky or pushkin in general, i would collect. anything, anything, whatever they offer me. so i would take on any role, but you see, the artist is a dependent person, dependent on the profession, he will offer, i will think, i will play. well , i would like, of course, the question is, when there are some castings for such historical characters not on some common heroes. of course, i confess, i monitor. that 's about it, it's still similar. i don't look like a mane. if you upload me, uh, will i look like or not, if necessary, some kind of correspondence and similarity to the characters. i try me. well, for now, what do i have with the

exception of only, perhaps, on my tingon , major general weitingan, and that was, uh, a television project on the unt channel, i played the general there, and i didn’t assume that i looked like him, but volodya lutsky, who filmed it like the director convinced him that one to one. well , we wish you all the best. ahead, and you played all the characters, oh, who you dream of and should live, what is still ahead with these feelings from children, let's move on, let's say, to more adults last time. we met. uh, in december of the twentieth year, and we sorted out, let's say, the aftertaste of the events of august of the same year, the youth theater, in which you served then and still serve. in contrast to the same kupala or grodno drama theater, it was not especially stormy. we are now we use such a term, but at the same time, it was then that you clearly and publicly both in our program and in

the newspaper of the security council of belarus today and in a social video you voiced your position towards the strikers towards the protesters and said such a phrase that you need to be careful with curses. even in social networks, you drew it with your opponent then quite seriously flew to you. well we're looking at you and already told you before the recording that you look great. hmm in a good position. spirit did not work their curse did not fly. i don't i think they were so sincere to the point, well people do a lot of things with an emotional impact. here i am now, when the passion has subsided a little, although it may be, it only seems that they have subsided. here they comprehended everything that happened and looking. for some reason, in today's situation, i think that everything that happened here with many people who, with their colleagues, found themselves at the epicenter of these events.

for some reason it seems to me that many of them regret what happened, i don't know, but at the same time, after all, they have changed some of them not only in the theater of art, but also in the country with many, glory. god kept some contacts. well, at least from friends. they didn't leave and they didn't delete me . although many have been removed. yes, it was the case, so they left there too. in some words, that it is impossible so impossible, there and so on. well, i accept it all and forgive, because, well, a person makes a decision, how is he in what situation and what opinion to have? well, at that moment, they probably thought that it should be so. i'm inclined to think that they were mistaken, how why did this happen? did they turn out to be victims of some kind of manipulation or did they convince them of something? they promised something, which is already worse, because they are already, in principle, this is already, as it were, some kind of venality.

maybe if you do this in life, then this will be for you, or i was not just mistaken from those who are younger there and their life has passed the path to the middle. i ended up in a marsupial forest, how somewhere? yes, they were in this forest. here, uh, artificially created. that's where they were taken. maybe maybe they fooled their heads, and they fell for it, but one thing always sobered me in this situation. i understood that all this does not come from my own. all this comes from there, and i thought, why in what whose . it is interesting that it is obvious that all this happened and was guided. uh, the whole whole thing and the created ones who were doing this and today here are the fakes that are walking around. after all, there is a lot in this information space. there are a lot of lies of fakes. and it’s very difficult to understand all this even now. they put pressure on weak on emotionality. after all, all this content is created.