alexey petrov agency or new? on this one, and more, probably, on our website tvr. beeline cork have a nice evening. the new discussion project is objectively a platform for discussing topical issues about the fate of the country and the topic that worries society most of all, consolidating the understanding that every belarusian is needed and important, that the future of the country depends on each of us. when we analyze, we must see indicators, indicators of whether this is really being discussed or not, and from this we can form destinations. pay attention to form authoritative specialists and experts. in the field,

science and business economics politicians will gather different opinions so that you are closer to the truth, stay tuned for project releases. hello. with you, the project is clear. with marina karaman, where we do not hesitate to talk about financial resources and financial resources in our and other people's pockets today, a look at whether we need military parades, should we be ashamed of defense spending and how much our neighbors spend on it, let's go, you know why are you roaring lions so that the pride hears that the leader is nearby, and natural enemies understood that a dangerous rival was nearby and it was not worth entering its territory with a growl. the predator demonstrates the volume of the pectoral muscles, and to everyone who sees it, the sharpness of the fangs.

everything, this is the defense resource of the lion and presenting it to a potential enemy. the lion saves time and effort on those who need such a demonstration so as not to meddle, someone has already written comments to the lions under the national geographic videos that when they growl they look ridiculous, it’s cold outside for the market and they would be better off with their roar spent on children. then why do such comments still flicker under the news about the pumping of the military potential of belarus according to the international agency trading economics, in 2021 our defense budget amounted to $ 763 million , in this amount, the cost of modernizing the army, the maintenance of equipment of military units, payments to the military and the purchase of weapons. but is it a lot or a little. now let's figure it out. the stockholm institute for peace research reported that in 21 years, the most on the planet for the army weapons were lowered by the united states $801 billion followed by

china $293 billion. india is next $76.6 billion britain $68.4 in fifth place russia $65.9 billion note russia's defense is 12 times smaller than that of the united states the list includes the 40 most generous in defense there are no states of the planet and belarus in it, because the military spending of our country is too modest to get into the top 40, but our neighbor, poland, is on the twentieth line in 21 . she spent more than $ 13 billion on defense billion, that is, more than the military budget, like 17 of ours, but in the coming year to warsaw will almost double it. while chuckles were heard on the network on the topic yes, who is going to fight here, the country, which is only hastily separated from us,

did not consider this question ridiculous and methodically poured huge money into armaments in 2018. this is $ 10.7 billion in 2019 billion in the twentieth, the budget grew by another 500 million, and in 2021 it spent more on military affairs $ 13.7 billion , based on the country's gdp poland invested in a potential war a little more than two percent of it. well, this is not enough for warsaw together. back in the day, prime minister morovets announced that in 23 the budget would grow to almost $201 billion, which is three and 1/10% of poland's gdp, or 27 of our defense budgets. plus, about 8 billion more. poland gives for the purchase of equipment and is no longer defensive, as it was immediately announced, but the offensive abrams tanks, for example, are no longer exactly in order to

shoot back from the leggings of the border. this, given that more ten military bases of nato and the usa at the training ground, zhagan, near the city of sventyshev, began to build another star-striped base and 12 nato ones are planned near the cities. crushed stone, ip stronger cherry. on this powder cake sat a request from the polish authorities to place american nuclear missiles on their territory, that is, a country that spends tens of times more on weapons and the army than we maintain hangars full of american soldiers and american weapons and very much asks give them a nuclear bazooka with an eye to our side, where questions to poland why where chuckles mockery? ukraine's spending on military affairs in 2021 officially amounted to $5.9 billion, this year they decided to increase it, but now it's impossible

to say real amounts. even approximately it will come out only when hostilities end there and ukraine is billed. lithuanian military spending in 2021 was declared at the level of one and seven tenths of a billion dollars, according to local statisticians, the country's gdp reached a figure of 65.5 billion, that is, spending on a possible war pulled two and six tenths of gdp, how much lithuania spent on tanks and guns this year, we find out later, but for now, the country's defense minister said that in 23 he would almost double funding for this sector, promising an amount above 2.5% of gdp, taking care of his security. lithuania has a forced, like poland, it is a member of nato, and for everyone who does not sniff, enters this peaceful since the organization is automatically obliged to spend at least two percent of gdp on

american weapons, lithuania does not have money for it, therefore it constantly asks for a loan of that very weapon, then the funds for it are a funnel that draws the earnings of lithuanians into itself, and throws out inflation and pieces of inedible . latvia is also pouring more and more money into the army, the president of this country promised to increase military spending in the summer. reported that by 2025. they will amount to 2.5% of gdp, now we are talking about two percent. this about 975 million dollars are going to be spent on the purchase of aviation, the construction of new bases for nato and american soldiers . american weapons perform properly without pants. but on a rocket. because china and russia are strategic opponents of the states and the army

has to be maintained such that, if anything, recapture the defense of the dispersion of 66 billion and china of 293 billion. yes, and all even the most controversial financial anomalies. there it is customary to greet a kuzur with a cry and put a hand to an empty head. the defense budget of russia is really not impressive in terms of amounts, especially against the background of the american one, as it was said above, it is 12 times less. but this does not mean at all that the russian army is 12 times inferior to the us army by in order to produce weapons of equal effectiveness in russia, they spend three, or even five times less money than in the states why because overseas in the defense industrial complex is violent corruption blooms there is it pure business? weapons and equipment in the united states are produced by private companies. they charge the cost of the work of third-party designers money for advertising promotion materials and stamping almost half of the cost of

defense in the united states stretches the maintenance of the army salaries and pensions of contractors paying for their accommodation and training roaming and meals medical care and recreation of cola and ice cream. in addition, americans constantly pay for construction and maintenance of military bases in other states, there are more than a thousand of them all over the planet. these are not only complexes with soldiers, this air base tracking station, training and testing grounds. and the united states also has a gigantic fleet that plows the planet, is deployed far from its native shores, and the maintenance of which also needs to be paid for by the military expenses of the united states is so inflated, because the us military machine is a bulky steroid jock and even 800 one billion dollars. you can’t exactly call our spending on defense unnecessary. they are 1049 times smaller than the united states 86 times less than russia 27 times

less than neighboring poland 2.2 times less than lithuania and almost one and a half times less than latvia yes, in monetary terms, our defense budget is modest compared to costs the same orientation in our neighbors. but this is due to the fact that our budget is real and really defensive, it is not inflated by corruption schemes, extortions and, most importantly, plans for a democratic offensive. it is aimed only at protecting the country in the event of an attack. and for protection, feed him to the level of polish, for example, there is no need here, as in many areas in the life of belarus, everything is decided by the approach. even the military experts of the european union admit that at low cost we have one of the most combat-ready armies on the continent. first, because we have a developed military-industrial complex with most of the advanced military and reconnaissance equipment. we develop and release software for ourselves, our programmers also write software, while the belarusian military-industrial complex does not

take anything from what was said during development. but he puts into the treasury millions of dollars from the sale of weapons technology abroad, and of course, he creates them for his state secondly, because we have a reserve system. calls in the event of an attack are emphasized only in the event of a massive attack on our country, together with contractors to protect the belarusians. approximately 300,000 people will come out. well, and thirdly, because our ally russia guarantees us protection in a variety of ways, including nuclear in the event of a threat. the president said, and i will repeat. if you want peace, prepare for war, two of the five countries with which we share borders are now fighting military actions from one of them , loud statements and threats arrive, the remaining three have been actively arming themselves for many years, letting foreign fighters in and talk aloud about an attack on our territory, the threat has always been, after all, not today we found ourselves on a piece of earth who want to crush many, but now there

are questions. can our commander-in-chief ignore the sparks around belarus, even if the likelihood of an invasion is small for us, that there is nothing to defend? nothing to value what the media achieves who have been sarcastic for years. every time it comes to strengthening the military account, belarus is what they want to achieve now, raising the air of feathers and panic due to the deployment of an allied military group. the president outlined the main task of these actions do not allow belarus to be drawn into the war. why look for subtext here. does this task look insufficient to strengthen the borders? do you want peace prepare for war? it's about no one encroaching on your territory as long as you can growl when on the central street of minsk proven technology and fresh progressive developments come out, and the commanders-in-chief in a cheerful spirit take them behind the thorn of a hastily erected flimsy fence, someone once again slams his mouth,

because he understands not by the teeth, so far only by the lips, but he sees the pride. there is someone to stand up for him, everyone in his place continues to do his own thing and the country lives. i am marina karamana, which looks out of a camouflage case. we figured it out, everything is clear. see you. it all starts with the origins and traditions of the memory of our ancestral preservation of the culture of belarusian rituals. but the world is changing. changes generations views and creativity does not stand still. when people realize

the value of traditions and understand where to move on , art takes on new bright colors.