hours from minus one in the west to -13 in the east of the country during the day from -8 ° to plus two from thursday will get a little warmer. and erratic weather is expected. atmospheric fantasy, southwest and europe will bring precipitation in the form of a mixed phase from wednesday to friday, atmospheric fronts from the southwest will cause precipitation at times. and basically. we see wet snow and snow. the air temperature at night will be from -3 ° to -10 °, on thursday it will be warmer, so my watch is expected to be zero minus six degrees, and in the daytime -3 +2 °. while on the roads sleet in the morning light fog, motorists should be especially vigilant. keep your distance from the speed limit. new information in my colleagues at 15:00 on our air . all the best.

good evening good evening. so, on december 13, exactly one year since you are the chairman of the cycle, belarus, you will agree, the year turned out to be very eventful and the draft law on cardinal changes to the electoral code is already coming out. let's get right when you expect to receive them. we expect

him to be introduced to the house of representatives in the near future. readiness is very high, because at the stage of its preparation. uh, the cec is not the only structure that worked with the preparation of this law. this is the national center for legislation for legal research, this deputies, and various public structures, including the public discussion of this document, so the stage of readiness is very high. i hope that soon he will be introduced to the house of representatives, why do i say? i hope, because the cec does not have the right to legislate initiatives. in this case, the head of state, therefore, initiated this law. therefore, uh, it will be introduced to the house of representatives and we hope that uh, the procedure for its consideration in parliament will pass quickly enough. although i do not rule out that we still have to work hard in the profile commission and for consideration in the first reading, for the second reading and then approval in the council of the republic. that is, this is

systematic work. i hope that, well maybe january, maybe february next year. we we will see the finished law. well, in any case, the changes are so drastic that, of course, the elaboration must be of very high quality, because , well, it is certainly and understandable that the referendum held this year also made its own adjustments, because we adopted the updated constitution and constitutional norms . and they also had to find their reflection, uh, in the electoral code, and besides this, a number of new legislative acts appear, uh, everything is legal in the belarusian people's assembly. on civil society uh amendments are being made to supplement the law on political parties. this also to a certain extent affects the norms of the electoral code is very strongly related. yes , everything is interconnected and in this regard we worked very closely with all the developers well. you recently had a meeting with elopomfilova, after which you announced that

belarus is in the process of developing an electoral law. yes, it relied, including on the russian experience. what kind of experience turned out to be in demand, but you correctly noted that we relied, among other things, yes, it was emphasized, because we have, uh, analysis of uh, various electoral systems, including those in the post-soviet space within the framework. the cis also has certain experience, with which we study in foreign countries, far abroad european countries, and so on. well, first of all, he is one. voting is a new system for us, but because in fact on this day we combine elections to the house of representatives and elections of all local councils and deputies, from regional and minsk city council to the lowest links to township and village councils is a new approach. it e requires serious analysis.

including, as happens in other countries, russia has long been using the method of election on the single voting day. and we were interested in this experience from the point of view of organizational technical, and information support of many other issues. a. by the way, this was not the first meeting with pamfilova, we met in may in moscow and by the way, one of my first foreign visits was just to moscow in order to study here those approaches that are used by the russian federation in e. holding a single day of voting. what drew attention to look at the information and communication technologies that are used we were shown the holy of holies of their back-end databases, where and so on and so on is quite open. there was communication, it should be noted that the russians. they are ready to provide us with many things, uh, in the form in which they are used in order for us to take into account experience, but this does not mean that we will now take everything,

what has been developed in the russian federation like this. uh, let's just implement it in our country and let's not pay attention to some of our own peculiarities, eh, some of our approaches, again, the traditions that we have developed in our electoral system. i wo n't say that our electoral system is somehow worse there or maybe better than some other electoral systems, like any other system. it has its pluses and minuses, but at the same time, it must be developed. you know, i, uh, noticed a long time ago that we very often very competently approach the creation new norms and new legislative acts precisely by analyzing. different legislation and getting a much better result than many of our neighbors, and in the end they start studying with us at the end of the twentieth, this is already evident. but here, look. the same impossibility of voting traitors in russia, but now can we say that this is already what they took from us as an

experience. it is quite possible, but you probably mean the norm that we have just prescribed, but in the electoral code we will not open sites abroad. yes, but again, we rationally approached this issue. well, even let's take it at a certain period. there holding even in the twentieth year of presidential elections. we opened sections in the russian federation, and in st. petersburg, moscow and kaliningrad. and what if our citizens were working somewhere in the vast expanses of the russian federation right now, for example, the vostochny cosmodrome is being built there, there and so on. they flew to moscow from the far east no, of course, no, of course not, but then again, we didn’t limit. we still have early voting, in contrast to the russian federation, which has a three-day voting period. they may be somewhere, they took into account our experience to a certain extent. and we have a little bit, after all, there is 5 days of early voting, plus, uh, the main voting day, that is, it is quite possible to choose

opportunities and this way to come. yes, but someone says it’s expensive, it’s problematic, but we must understand that in the same presidential elections in the twentieth year, 0.3% of the classified lists voted abroad, this time even less than errors, that's right because, well, at the same time they heard whining abroad. but how can we be? how can we act and so on. well, for some reason, none of them whine about the fact that we have a leech there for elections there 75 there 80%. that is, there is still a certain percentage of citizens who do not come to the polling station and do not participate in the elections. this is basically their right. although i believe that everyone should take part in elections, but unlike various advanced democracies, we do not introduce fines for not showing up to the polling station there, yes, we do not hold accountable, as in some other countries foreign experience is, we say that this is your right, i will use this right, come and you must understand that we

spend quite a lot of money on organizing elections, we are too democratically. it seems to me that sometimes sometimes we still continue to be embarrassed that we kind of want to tighten things up a bit or put them in order, in my opinion. after the twentieth, there is no need to be shy at all, because no one is with us shy. why we were not shy, i can say that we are even a little ahead in this respect. i mean, the post-soviet space of the cis countries this year. we are celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the convention on standards for democratic elections, electoral rights and freedoms of citizens. eh, 20 years ago. it was signed by the heads of all. beyond those included in the cis, this is a unique document, by the way, that's a lot we like, er, to correlate, that's our legislation there with european legislation, and so on. so, uh, in 2001, on the eve of signing, this document passed a legal examination in the osce diplomatic mission and received a generally positive conclusion, and in the

seventh year, the venice commission, which also has certain conclusions on the conduct of elections. she also generally gave her positive conclusion to this document, but at the same time, i carefully raised all the recommendations that were accepted, at different stages and in different years, that is all, which now unites about fifty-seven countries, yes , and european and well, in general, world countries and, uh, we see that these recommendations are all here, well, for some specific situations, that is, experts wrote some recommendations there for observers. for long-term observers and so on. but these are, in fact , methodological recommendations, those that we even adopt, at least by decision of the central election commission, by and large. but there is no such document, which is approved to ratify the rules, and it was not by chance that the head of state spoke. and so i observed many

elections, and i had to work in various capacities in election campaigns, and as the chairman of the minsk city commission, at one time, the precinct commission and as the deputy chairman of the city executive committee, also performed their functions, ensuring the preparation of the elections within the framework of the powers that give the code, the head of state said, about what what? let's develop these standards. let's approve them in due course. it is not profitable. for them, this is for today, while this is not, unfortunately, but at the same time, we correlate and look at our legislation on the subject of our international obligations, including those within the framework of those international organizations in which we participate well. look here. russian experience yes, we have a single voting day for the 24th year. the first single voting day is february 25th. yes, it will take place, as long as traditionally without electronic voting. at least you already talked about it, yes, but in general, why the devil, if it makes sense to talk about it at all? well, yes, electronic

voting is a separate topic and here it is. eh, you can't just enter it. here we cannot talk about it and go implement it tomorrow. that is, trust me. i'm not very sure what to do? well, to be more precise, i am sure that it is not necessary, especially controversial issues, by the way, even pamfilov at the forum that we held the youth forum and elections. e, he spoke about the fact that there are also psychological aspects, that is, there is a very large category of citizens who generally do not perceive it. this is electronic voting. they want to come in traditional uniform to the site where some kind of holiday is organized - this is the mentality. agree, a vision defined in this plan, but by the way the same abs, we constantly reproached. uh, and , by the way, in the materials of the conference, which was held in st. petersburg on the twentieth anniversary, dedicated to our cis convention, they just nailed ours in the fact that this is not bad, that some kind of holiday is organized on the site there in trade there etc. although we say that this is our mentality. by the way, the past

elections in kazakhstan also confirm this mentality that they also took place at the polling stations some things in america do not bother anyone. here is e-voting, a separate serious topic. well, firstly, e- voting should be tied to a single digitalization system for the entire country. and what do i mean, the population register must be completed, uh, started to make it working, and the registers of voters a-a should already follow from it, so the register of voters cannot appear by itself. we need all the subjects involved in this process to make appropriate adjustments within a certain period of time, and so on and so forth. this is the first second e, without e, the corresponding programs of the software package, which means that electronic voting cannot be done. again , it is desirable that the program be our national. yes, definitely moreover, it

must be managed by, uh, the appropriate government agency. in particular, the cycle must be managed. they just mean get some kind of bookmark, which is the end result. uh, suddenly stop working there, or suddenly refuse, there and so on and so on. that is, these questions security, including national security. here. well, and, uh, most importantly, we probably need to test this system, test it in some elections, it’s probably wrong, we probably need to test it in other situations. by the way, this topic was also discussed and, for example, the same cec of russia has some platforms that they allow to involve people. here are some forms of electronic voting. the same youth of students, there and so on, for example, elections of self-government in a university in electronic format. yes, that's why they have a very good tradition. they they in artek hold such peculiar elections. that is, in this way i join, that is, i need to test it, i need to form a certain trust in this

form, and voting is not an easy thing. but we are working with it. i agree with you that, in some long-term perspective, there may appear and in this kind of voting, by the way, he will remove marat sergeyevich from the topic of voting abroad, because for this system it will be absolutely. it doesn't matter where you are in pinsk in minsk in st. petersburg there or uh, vienna somewhere and so on, agree there will be 25,000 new claims based on this vote. you know how and when. agreed for some reason, i remembered this little anecdote of the military, yes, when a when checking on a fire shield. now, if there is a shovel, there will be 42 flaws, and if there is no one, there will be one flaw, come on, you remember this. okay , 2020. yes, he showed once again that the choice is a loophole for coup d'état, as usual, timed. yes, in your opinion. what kind

changes in the electoral code can be called work on our emphasized liberal mistakes. well, it's hard to disagree, any election. they politicize society and create, perhaps, some kind of social tension. this is a clash of opinions. that's all, obviously. it is a pity that today this mechanism is subjected to certain external influences even by the united states advanced democracy. and she, uh, suddenly declares that someone interfered in our presidential elections there, but in this case they blamed russia although i don’t know to what extent this was confirmed there were no facts of these facts, but at the same time they were accused, so this will always create some kind of these tensions. it is necessary to form the legal culture of the population, it is necessary to strengthen confidence in their electoral system. well, here is one of our diplomats, who often visited as an

observer in the us elections. yes, he told me such a case comes. there, two marines collect ballots after voting in bags and they were taken somewhere, he says. they will count, they will say, because no one has any questions, yes, but we have so, oh, i brought it to the ballot from the polling station. there he posted it on the internet there, and now he begins to procrastinate on this topic and everyone gasps. ai-yay-yay-yay, how this bulletin was carried out. well, they brought it to ur, there cannot be any one bulletin. this is also understandable, two or three there. and if you received, there are so many ballots in the ballot box - there should not be more than you receive, but it may turn out to be less. it 's natural. that’s why this legal culture is a very important aspect, and by the way, we included one one of the main norms, which, by the way, was also spied on by the russian federation. by the way, in many other countries, according to the legislation, the function of the central election commission is to participate in outreach work and educational activities in matters

of electoral law. but this is also one of those things. and as for the opposition to all these things. well, it is clear that let's say the same political parties. here is a ban on funding from the outside can understand. what levers include informational financial yes and they create cells, which are directly financed from abroad, and they actually play the role of the fifth column, which means that they must fulfill the requirements that they then present there. we paid you money. now do what we require here. uh, here the legislation should, uh, strictly define. uh, such an attitude towards such, uh, structures of civil society and to such participants in the electoral process, which, uh, these things violate, we have tightened the requirements, like the accreditation of national observers. in particular. now the national observer must be accredited before the start of early voting. and also remember we had this process going on early voting, then the main day of voting

observer. can come accredit. yes, here, in theory, the commission is busy issuing ballots and there is a flow of citizens . we have found that the observers have priority over the commission. yes, even such a thing. yes, again, we were forced to take somewhere there, but especially covid this year the 20th they made a decision when they restricted their stay there. uh, so the observers there on the site lined up some kind of specific schedule, and so on. and this is also in principle, but the norm that allows. uh, it 's in no way contrary to convention. not some kind of normative international act. and by the way, in the same united states, for example, there are states in general where they don’t invite at all and even international observers to any elections and so on are also normal, but we are open to dialogue with any international structures and with international observers and national observers. but if that's all the same, here's some

more private things. yes, i mean changes to the code. let's go through here. yes, literally briefly, for some that are important. for example , carousels at polling stations. yes, well , you must agree long before the elections and you yourself saw it, minsk was filled with cars with regional numbers , they came, they registered, they attached themselves to polling stations, and they already staged a riot, the figure was called there 89 stations, which, unfortunately, yes, were occupied in this way. yes, all over the country, and more than six dozen in minsk at the same time, being in the booth there for a long time, while the damage to the ballot to issue a replacement for the lost queue was colossal and normal people could not exercise their right, because they simply were not given this. here. how can we not allow these people to paint such a picture in the next elections, firstly, we have laid down the norm that if he wants to

vote the main place of residence and let's say in minsk well, the situation. there are different ones, maybe someone brought e-mother from the village for the winter period. yes, and my mother, what to go to the village to vote there someday near the side of the site. yes, first of all, it will be regulated, including by cec resolutions, we already regulated this at a referendum, when we determined it. what documents confirm temporary residence on the territory of this site , for example, if this is a tenancy agreement , then this is a registered agreement in settlement center corresponding e. well, if this is a mother, then it will be necessary to confirm the relationship. i guess that's how i understand it, but the commission will make appropriate decisions, but at the same time, all this must be done before the main voting day. that is, if you want your mother to vote there, for example, here at this site they are at home, where she is registered there, then you must contact the commission in advance, the commission will contact the

place of residence where the commission works, they will exclude the lists for voting. here will bring list and you can vote, either early or on the main voting day. but if you come on the main voting day, without doing this preliminary work, you will simply be sent to vote at your main place of residence. this is the first moment, the second moment is, uh, related to the ban on photography. uh, and the ability to spread this newsletter there media on the internet. there you have us a bulletin from the site and so on and so forth spoiled ballot. once a repeated ballot can be issued, that is, they are so that it was not registered before and well, well, i understand, i messed it up once. well, two, well, not three, not 5, not 10, obviously questions related to the long stay in the voting booth. yes, and it can be interpreted as, uh, obstructing the work of the

election commission, and with all the ensuing consequences of voting, around which so many copies were broken, how relevant is this topic now and maybe it makes sense, well allow and what's the big deal, if voting publicity a person demonstrates how he voted, firstly, it can be regarded as campaigning on voting day. there is a second point here. still, the secrecy of voting is one of the most important principles laid down in international law, including in the convention that we all signed and in our legislation. this norm exists. and that's why, probably, after all, this mystery of the vote. and this principle, it will be preserved, that is, another question. which, by the way, is one of and also one of the conflicts, as far as the secrecy of voting is observed in electronic voting by mail. sorry voting and so on, yes, but these are questions that are technically required. well, probably

a discussion, maybe, uh, maybe some kind of scientific understanding, even there a discussion at the level of relevant experts, who, uh, have a good command of the issues, but i think that the very principle of secret voting will remain another question, that uh, when, uh, did they fuck us up? sorry for this word, the lack of curtains on the booth was given due to the fact that the secret ballot is not respected, but now we have done it at the academy of management, where we have training courses for potential participants in electoral companies, organizers of electronic companies, we did it there, but we will say this as a sample constituency . we have cabins there, just without curtains. and here you are standing face to face. uh, to this small table where tickets are filled with your back, you close it. uh, in fact, the entrance to this booth, that is, none of commissions. he doesn’t see something, he put a sign there, and then you don’t write a treatise there, that you put a tick there, folded the ballots, threw them into the ballot box, that is, in no way does the machine for electronic

voting, which are used in states, yes. and what is covered with curtains? no, of course, they stand next to each other with small partitions. even more there, it’s even an office there sometimes, uh, such partitions are simply put up. good humor and a warm-up for the mind sometimes you want ask the participants of the game a difficult question, but they do not cope well and with easy two teams will meet in the intellectual arena. early response. forget what early 10 seconds have passed, we don't have such terms, but nice good. perhaps it was leonov must be exactly then without the opportunity to be the best not because it's interesting, but this business is so interesting sometimes

lucky, sometimes unlucky. and then maybe lucky a finger to the sky, maybe three two one helped. how interesting to spend the weekend go in for sports put things in order at home lie on the couch, or you can explore our beautiful belarus every week, we lay new routes in the corners of our country, however, centuries-old trees remained not only in helmets. they can be found even today, this particular oak is already 400 years old, and to wrap around its trunk. we need about four adults, we show historical monuments cultural

entertainment alexandra vasilyevich will be with you now conduct a master class in pottery we introduce you to local food and customs of belarusian cuisine. as a true fan of potatoes, i ordered pancakes for myself. look in the program the route is built. on the tv channel belarus 24 hello skin, i want everyone to know that there is such a village and the place is good to read, that this is turov land. they are the most fertile on the other side. here are the roads, there they were completely planted with hazel, probably, 800 meters in five years, the current will be such its own, well, a forest belt of heated forests. you can safely say yana's blessings for

ugly land near belarus well, today we have a collection of tomatoes. this means that the earth is not only potatoes, corn and that's it. the rest we have another 17 days. there is one more question. here are the links to those changes. yes, the age limit changes. this is very important and probably follows the presidential to presidential age of the price of candidates. naturally, the requirements for the candidate as a whole and for the deputy manda. yes, and for the presidential post,

as far as citizenship is concerned, as regards special conditions from another country. this one is what concerns the president of presidential candidates. this is a constitutional norm. it was adopted in a referendum. i want to remind our viewers and there really is an age limit. uh, 40 years old second numbness 20 years old. he must live exactly in belarus, called yes, but, besides this, he must not have, uh, have or should not have had. previously, either now citizenship, or succumbed to another state, as well as documents that give preferences on a political, religious, or national basis. uh-huh. the same norm has been transformed into candidate requirement. e to the deputies of the house of representatives members of the council of the republic delegates of the vns. and, uh, deputies of local councils of deputies in approximately the same form, only not the age price

is meant, this is citizenship and e preferences. uh, on a political, religious or national basis. it has been transformed. this is also reflected. but it's natural. we also take into account the experience of neighbors , we see how suddenly a person arrives from abroad. some countries will not call them after receiving. there, education, which there, so to speak, worked out in a certain system. yes , he is elected president, and suddenly the people are interested in him, he is no longer interested in his own, but accepts. this is an action that is counterbalanced, but the demands of the people and the aspirations that they, that means, they put forward during the election campaign, as a result, they go to demonstrations , hold peaceful actions, and so on, but no one hears them, and the country moves, well, in the way that, uh, predetermined, uh, those puppeteers who this candidate was sent to this or that country by people in any case who have another

citizenship and become presidents. well, that is, he has citizenship, roughly speaking, there romania becomes the president of moldova yes, this is considered normal no guys. it is not normal. actually. i will say that in kazakhstan there is now a norm. here's our, uh, church members watching. here they came and reported to us, uh, the results of the observation. and here is the analysis of these elections as a whole. by the way, there is one more strict requirement from the presidential candidates. he must have at least 5 years of experience in public service. and this immediately knocks the ground out from under the feet, even for some of our potentially national, uh, contenders. eh, after all, how it turns out, well, a successful businessman. here, something like, some capital was made there, and so on, but here the authorities really wanted to merge capital with power. and so he went, so, here, here, come on, using all this resource. here i am ready. so you work first.

here, in the civil service. that's how they decided in kazakhstan, and they don’t want to go to the civil service, because the salary of a businessman is higher than that of a civil servant, you understand, and you have to work for 5 years in this mode. i've worked for 5 years, for example, as the same deputy chairman of the minsk city executive committee. it 's crazy graphics. even compared to the position of the minister, i can still say that in the gospel comments, especially minsk. this is a crazy schedule. not everyone can bear it. but there is such a norm in kazakhstan, we do not have this norm . we have others. this would be a good standard. well, perhaps, unfortunately, i once ran into comrades who represented the opposition camp at that time. unfortunately, they don’t know the simplest banal things for a civil servant, neither the system of power, how it is built, how it works, in any way, the relationship between branches and authorities and authorities is carried out and when let’s go directly to a person who

comes to the highest state position. he will need to explain it from scratch. well the truth is, it's not just wasted time. these are big costs for the people. i will tell you more when you even have civil service experience. yes, and you went through some stages, certain steps, and you come to a higher position. i came down from the mountain from the regiment of the ministry anyway, you need a year to adapt where the word is true. so yes. and what will happen if a person did not have this experience at all, no matter how simple, it seems to me, the time has come not to be shy, taking this kind of radical decisions. and it's okay, it's not good. here is the submission for public discussion. yes draft laws. well, including uh, the law uh on changing the electoral code. yes, what main points did you see for yourself, that is, remarks addition. yes, how resonant they were or how belarusians are ready to participate in the legitimate solution of such issues. you know there were no resonances. there were some technical changes, there were some suggestions. e,

related to some kind of technology. so, there is the organization of elections and so on. they will undoubtedly find some reflection in the decisions of the central the election commission, which is endowed with these powers by the electoral code, and so on, we have taken into account some norms. well, for example, e. we have taken into account the norm that candidates for deputies of the house of representatives will be able to nominate their own representatives, e to district commissions with the right of an advisory vote. uh -huh well, i do not see anything problematic in this, in general, completely. perhaps we have such experience when presidential candidates nominate the central electoral commission, and members of the central electoral committees with an advisory vote. well, uh, besides this, we took into account the possibility of voting not at the place of main residence. i have already spoken about this, and some of these questions have also been raised . therefore, in general, i can say that the electoral code has not found at the public

level any set of contradictions that would prevent its adoption today. as i understand it, there are no special problems, in fact, no, yes, if certain polishing, and that's it, you led the communist party for a long time. well, in general, i publicly, uh, informed the public that i suspended my membership in the apartment of belarus because the chairman of the central election commission can not be a member of any political party. i remember it perfectly, but to be honest, there are no former communists. this is fine. here is the theme of the party. construction, she has always been not just complicated, but so around her there were a lot of copies broken. yes, and the twentieth year showed that some parties are not just useless amorphous, but they also carry a danger to state i will arrange moreover, we er, now we see that some party leaders have been condemned. i didn't even build a state. in general, national statehood is accepted. yes, i understand that we do not need

pocket parties, an oligarch. yes, which is also quite common, well, and sofas of three party members, who are loudly called parties. we don't need them either. here's how you feel about the issue of possible government funding. well, let's say useful parties and maybe you will consider something else in this matter necessary. well, first of all, i want to say that i evaluate my work and membership in the communist party very positively . and i want to emphasize that the party is the platform when the most powerful level is formed, and the political culture is a certain experience, both organizational and leadership, and the ability to conduct a discussion, communication skills, and so on and so forth.

this is again team work with a group of people, so, uh, it's all a very positive experience, and the one who is going to go into politics, or engage in managerial activities, no doubt. this is an experience. therefore, i am also very grateful to those comrades with whom i was lucky enough to come into contact, including that party soviet elite who once led the bssr and who handed over somewhere to us somewhere some of their own, uh, the reins of government and e your certain experience of the social here there were times when the loss of a party card. it meant the collapse of fresh life in terms of funding, but it's more inherent proportional or mixed electoral systems. we still have an electoral electoral system, and at the same time, i fully admit that some kind of decision can be made at the legislative level, if possible, financing of some

events carried out, and by these or those party structures . let's say it's in the interest. naturally, of course, and the party must comply with the requirements, if it stands for let's say, there is destruction. pintet independence what, by the way, is a very big discussion now, and so on, then, of course, no one will finance this party. it is clear that no one will support. you can be an opposition party. the president also says that you can express your own alternative views on this or that problem, for example, views on the path of development. yes , you can express your opinion there on the program of socio-economic development and so on and so forth. but if you set a goal that is completely different, uh, or vice versa, as in some countries, we observe that they promised they would stop the war is regulated there by the donbas and so on, but, on the contrary, as a result, everything led to what we are seeing today, that is, completely different. the actions that led to all this and people are

perplexed about what is happening and why this is happening, therefore, in principle, i, as an option , admit that this is possible, and probably, or maybe there is some, so to speak, a certain connection , moreover, i know that there is such an experience, for example, in the same russian federation and the party there are both opposition and pro-government, and so on. they are financed from the budget, at least those events that, uh, they organize there in particular, and so on and so forth, but they have funding, and if the party overcomes certain new numbers, again a proportional system. rather, a mixed system. this one is mixed. let's then the last question is about a philosophical one. unfortunately, the latter is in the main elections in the country. we elect the president of the country and it is easy for us in this regard, at least it has always been easy. we have alyaksandr lukashenka what is

the president leader the first chief head of state? but today, in many countries, presidents are figureheads, and not clearly leaders of nations. it is not about the interests of the people, and it is very important for us not to make a mistake in the future. namely, the arrival of zelensky macrons in the scholtsy, or god forbid there for everything or cutlets, but it's true, it will be a tragedy for the people. vns. the president said what not to do. this body is for itself like this, maybe it makes sense to secure the country in the future empower the supreme people's council with the power to elect the president. that's why we are worse than china or also great britain. well , you raised a very serious problem of the problem. it is the continuity of power in the interests of the people. and you are

right, probably not every nation. can afford to have a president depending solely on his will. unfortunately today. that's what you call many presidents dependent on the will of multinational corporations. there, from some financial, that means, uh, institutions, structures from some kind of clans, oligarchs. some of them either around the oligarchs, and so on and so forth, some of them are there today, uh, i see, there are news sites, there again our goal is a world government, that is, we need to topple all nation-states and expose them. so the influence of the world government, so to speak. we will say this, and so on and so forth, the question of national identity, the preservation of national cultures there, and others, it is also relevant today, not only in our country, it is also in europe today, as this topic sounds like never before, and so further, therefore, we must understand that it

doesn’t work out in elections, as it turns out, in some other states, that they promise one thing, but something else comes and does something completely opposite, and all people, then they begin to see clearly, open their eyes and say so, we thought it would be so, but it turns out differently, therefore, i have long been for myself. that's how simple a citizen is. even the chairman of the cec just like an ordinary citizen of the republic of belarus decided for himself these fairy tales for me. what are we going to change power, and then we will think where it will move. yes, we'll see, for me, these stories do not work. and we already saw this around the nineties, when let's destroy the soviet union and then we'll see what happens. i still want to see this one. here is at least a medium-term perspective, where we will move and what guarantees we have leverage e to ensure that we do not start moving in some other direction, if you come here under the slogans of the left and say that we will provide everything social

guarantees and stuff, and then come do start it. yes, on the contrary, then, probably, there must be mechanisms. you correctly touched upon the topic of the entire belarusian assembly. it is meant to be this particular one . well, it's a mechanism of containment. here are some of the negative processes that can take place, and, perhaps, even to the point of stopping these processes if they run counter to the interests of the people from here. this is such a powerful imagine. including the possibility of inviting an even wider circle of the population, it means to this meeting, because the delegates there , according to the legislation, change the memory of 1200 , somewhere the maximum number. but we hold a meeting, as a rule, in the great hall of the palace of the republic, there, at almost 3,000, several thousand can pass, yes, but they can be in this hall, therefore, these are the mechanisms. they are also very important. how to display them. maybe in the future and there will be prints of this solution. bye. you know that the constitution, wow, gave certain

powers if the belarusian assembly and the function election of the president, while there is not provided. although i do not exclude that there may be those who will work after us. maybe they will offer some other options, maybe it will be some kind of initiative from below. although i know that some such questions were received when the entire belarusian people's assembly discussed the bill, but today we are connected exclusively. the constitution that was adopted in a referendum on february 25 this year. well i'm since not u chairman of the central election commission. yes, uh, freelance journalist. i can afford to say that i would introduce such a norm and believe me, i’m sure that it would be good for the country, but as for me, as the chairman of the special central election commission, the leadership, exclusively of the electoral legislation and those regulatory legal acts that regulate these issues, is a great conversation . thank you thank you we

are going on a grandiose trip around belarus for sure. many have heard that the geographical center of belarus is located in this region, but not everyone knows that this is the only area. whose name does not coincide with the name of the regional center a memorial sign in the form of a gate and 1.067 the date of the first mention of the city in the tale of bygone years professional guides. the local historians on the working floor were using a winch through the door to lift bags of grain and pass them to this beam near the beam. here are such huge tongs, author's routes and interesting places. you know the holy trinity church immediately by its cornflower blue domes.