cold, spitting on all the tweed, they wrote that it turns out that a man and a woman and children are a family. this is colonial policy. this is a policy of oppression . and this is an unfair world for me. and, probably, for all belarusians for all russians. and, probably, russia and belarus are now fighting this for the right to self-determination for the right to be myself, so that i am not afraid to say that i want a family, i have a wife and children. and i'm a family man, and they are already afraid there. this must be hidden. i don't want to fight to rainbow flags were everywhere. i want to fight for some values, because of which my grandfather died, when the great patriotic war ended. he told me. now we are going to explore space. we will feed africa, the whole neighbor. east poverty will not be a warrior will not. now, if he got up now, he saw the graves, to which we have slipped, we are standing on the brink of war and we are arguing where to hang the rainbow flag and convinces us that this is the most important thing. what should i be thinking about? and i

must also have three iphones, three ipads, i must eat go to the toilet, and there is nothing to think about. this is the world we will fight against. they started the phrase. what is the world of the future or what? what are we supposed to fight for? i would probably correct and say that it is not the right to life, but the right to a decent life, and dignity is a multifaceted concept. it's not just material goods. they must be, and without this you can’t get anywhere, because throughout all these centuries, it was, uh, the distribution of goods, well, some were not quite adequate, as others said, fattened had nothing, but to this dignity. we must also add the right to self-determination, the right to e, following one's own traditions. uh, the right not to live in an idiotic global world when you don't have the right to say the right to express your opinion to you.

immediately it will be closed via twitter will be closed. through uh, criminal prosecution and so on and so forth the right to live on one's own land. raising your own children and giving them a normal, adequate future is probably the way to go. thank you. well, this is an open question for him. come back again and again and check. probably, including every deed, every word and deed. e with what is really what we should strive for, so that it doesn’t turn out the way oleg sergeevich said so that we reduce our existence. here is the one and only life so that we will choose three iphones three ipads well, and so on according to the list that oleg sergeevich said thank you for being with us today, everything is happy.

buzin nikolai evgenievich doctor of military sciences professor expert in the field of military national security, i propose to talk about issues of national security and their impact on our region and our state. hello live program. say, don't be silent in the studio victoria popova and tatyana shcherbina and our guest today is nikolai busin. good afternoon, glad to see you nikolai evgenievich thank you for coming to our studio. and what to discuss at the meeting of the president , topical issues of defense and measures to respond to the aggravation of the situation were discussed, and the situation around belarus, as we know, remains difficult

the increased militarization of the body continues. you are our frontiers, as we see, even the data is concentrated in a large group. nato president warned that we should be on the alert as long as we manage to deter a potential adversary from using military force against belarus but nonetheless. we must constantly monitor to see and not miss in any case do not miss the signs that indicate immediate preparation for aggression. against our country. what other signs, besides the strengthening of the grouping, after of our borders, you would note an important one of the directions is the information impact, the information impact on the population on our population, the information impact on the population of europe and the preparation of people's consciousness for the fact that war is inevitable, or its perception is retouched,

if slightly and everything works for all this means mass media. this is probably the first direction. the second direction is also the most powerful political pressure, the direction that clearly indicates preparation for something let's call it a bad war for now. in any case, the political pressure of our state is on all fronts. it is both an international organization and a sports organization. these are also bilateral contacts. this shutdown is a practical shutdown and there's no other way to call it an iron curtain on our western frontier. this is a constant discussion of the topic. uh, some incomprehensible transitional coalition governments somehow only call this proclamation. the new leadership of our country and everything is outside our borders and everything is in the interests of our country. these are all elements of forcing the situation.

in addition, i would like to point out, in addition, that this grouping was shown. these are reconnaissance activities. these are the flights of aircraft of nato countries closer to our borders, the strengthening of the satellite constellation in space and the constant replication of all kinds of threats against the republic of belarus for all possible reasons. well, recently, probably, there has already been such a real statement that the time is coming. military so to speak solution of the belarusian issue and such moments appeared. about what this says, informational psychological preparation of its own population is being carried out. training. the elites of the world are preparing the opinions of other states that it is inevitable that everything is called such there is a term.

a period of growth, a military threat, and all these actions fully fit into this concept. well, here it comes again. uh, forty- one. yes, when well found, people like to remember and say that they say stalin was already warned that there were signs. yes, supposedly hitler is preparing an invasion, but stalin did not listen and, uh, did not take any action. e. here, drawing parallels in the forty-first year, defense minister viktor renin. that's what people said were and forty-first on leadership. of course they didn't see it. but uh, what is being prepared like that, but then again? well, it's probably ours. slavic is such a mentality that we gullible people believe. yes, there was a pact, not an attack signed, although everything that happened near the borders. something seems to be happening right now, and we have it going on and you know the leadership of it

armed forces asked. uh, questions to the opponents. and why are you here aviation to our borders to throw the answer like this. well, we hide them so the british don't bomb them. well, okay. and why are you moving troops to the borders, but we are taking them out to rest so that they can rest after well, hypocrisy is its lie, that's all. it was 41 happening. it is now after the collapse of the union that we were promised there would be no advancement of nato to the east. it's good that we now see all of nato near our border. what do they say, well, belarus is russia - this is them preparing to defend. well, you see, that's all. opponents opponents can already be said, and if in this sense. only the strong are respected, we must proceed

from this concept, if we are strong, if we have the means to protect our own country, then there will be no need for any hypocrisy. and even if it remains there, let’s add the following, if before the war that was just discussed, we had a certain pact, or rather, the soviet union and germany today we don’t have any facts. we have a clear understanding that we are subhuman in the concept of the european union, the documents do not spell out any guarantees , we owe nothing, the guarantees that we were given in the ninety-sixth year, when we withdraw strategic weapons from our territory , hmm and nuclear weapons, including, uh, they don’t comply everything that was written there and remains. well, pay attention to european politicians who speak clearly. yes, once we probably deceived russia. well, it was, right? well, now the situation, so today the political so to speak

the levers do not work, and based on the approaches and goals that our neighbors have, they cannot be called partners today, this whole word should have been forgotten. they are not partners. for a long time they have been opponents of possible opponents, they probably call it whatever you want, but their only task is to move forward to weaken russia, in parallel to introduce belarus into the sphere of their own influence, well, take advantage of what we have, but in reality, hmm, today belarus is a buffer between nato and the russian federation, and stoltenberg's statement heads of nato makes it clear what they want, he says, we cannot allow russia to win in ukraine this is a victory for russia - this is a defeat over not

ukraine, it’s the whole question for you about the fact that there are elements of deception, they are, but we are no longer so hired and this phrase is a little bit, well, it is correct from a historical point of view, but today it is a little bit different from the speech and work of our president at the joint. events with the leadership of law enforcement agencies shows that we understand what is happening around, we do not amuse ourselves with illusions that a thunderstorm will pass us by and do not flatter ourselves with the confidence that someone will help us in this situation. and our closest neighbors will stay away. if suddenly, god forbid , something becomes bad for us, therefore. it is impossible to say that we are naive today, naivety has gone away over the years. we clearly understand who we are talking to.

we clearly understand what they want. we clearly understand what to expect from them, and therefore the steps that our leader of the country and the military bloc and military organizations of the state are taking. they aimed at one thing - to preserve the sovereignty of the territorial integrity of our country to ensure a peaceful life for people and the solution of tasks , namely the strategic tasks of ensuring national security. nikolai evgenievich here. uh, yes, those provocations that we see at our borders. i understand that this is a continuation of the topic that you have already begun to tell us about the growth of the military threat, and i mean, and uh, the drone is coming. yes, and the bmp will drive up and the border guard will get lost. well, in general, everything. it develops into this here theory, which you told us from the very beginning told. and we can somehow stop this

growth, how we influence it here an interesting situation is the growing military threat that is being discussed. this process is natural at the moment, because there is a war going on near our borders, this is the first one, you know very well about it, the second is europe today, uh, it supports our neighbors ukraine in full and does almost everything for this to please the united states. uh, there are certain plans. and this no one hides about how to solve it. e questions, yes let's say the dominance of the issues of reorganizing the world specifically on the territory of ukraine is one of the elements of today's reorganization of the world, the birth of a multipolar world order of geopolitical processes, but uh, everything, is that the world is based on rules in terms of terminology. the neighbors of the european union, the united states, in their opinion, cannot be destroyed in any way; it must be preserved. and what is

it? this is again everything that we had before, what we want, then we do, you fulfill our commands, our m-m wishes in russia, the country is a gas station, belarus is an agrarian appendage, which should ensure that those in power give their resources to give their people to maintain the well-being of a certain circle and community of people in the world. if so, then there are rules, who established them. tell me, please, no one is like that now, no one will say what this rule is. well we think so, we think that should be the rule. and this reorganization of the world is impossible without the most powerful confrontation, without confrontation between states. where the last argument is the weapon that's what today we are observing that, as far as our borders are concerned, we are simply being probed, watching our reaction , reconnaissance of our forces and means,

assessing our capabilities in terms of air defense. these are drones. uh, our capabilities from the point of view of the management system, how quickly information about some event, uh, reaches decision makers, that is, this is precisely what all these provocations consist of. there will be many of them, no less. and how do you think the answers should be symmetrical. or should we hold so uh it's time to end with symmetry it's time to approach the seven-meter. what is symmetry is to solve with minimal forces the tasks that they solve with large forces, something like this, if it’s very simple, well, let’s say a drone has arrived. he went to our territory. we do not use our own air defense systems, we just turn on rap. and he falls. immediately we take it away, remove information from it and then

use it in our own version. this is a symmetrical version already done. this is how it is and examples, no one says that we do not do this. we are doing this. for this there is armed forces. for this system, for this there are border forces. we do. it's just, uh, unfortunately, we have not been public for so many years, and the military's speech about the new is extremely rare on s-, uh, television and so on. we actually carry out all the necessary measures. and this should reassure our citizens if we are still in a peaceful country. and this has been for many years and we have been providing our defense capability, not with the greatest means. look, let's even draw such a parallel for over the past 10 years, the eu has spent $350 billion more than 10 years ago on defense

, can you imagine how much our budget is, the military has been quite small for many years and not in vain, and the president spoke about this and the heads of departments that we manage to enough small means to solve those tasks for which it is required, well, colossal means our neighbors, our opponents pump in huge amounts of money. but why do they download so much? because a lot of stealing someone is a normal situation. as without it? well, you understand that wherever there is war. there is an opportunity to warm one's hands if funds are used, er, wisely, if they are used exceptionally prudently, then there is an opportunity to solve the same problems with other investments in your opinion, which is why we still do not have a war. they are afraid to answer the main answer

, because we have an established state, we have a strong enough leader who is ready to make decisions and a leader who pays a lot of attention to the military security of the state inevitably entails human losses, as among civilians. yes, and of course , numerous losses among, uh, the military. uh, urson. this is the head of the european commission. recently she announced the number of dead soldiers of the armed forces of ukraine more than 100,000 people, yes, she voiced, and this phrase, then they cut it out of her speech in all the media and it was impossible to find it, that is, they tried somehow, and this figure was muffled , then there was a message that the european commission would not apologize to ukraine in connection with the publication of data on one hundred thousand dead ukrainian soldiers, according to

the russian ministry of defense on e, in my opinion, on november 29 there is also a figure of 135,000 people who died in ukraine at the same time. uh, ukraine in every possible way denies such figures there , the same arrest officer says that, well, there are a little more than 10,000. well, maybe 10-20 thousand. yes, so under the text that, well, who counts them there, in your opinion? why is ukraine hushing up, uh, data on losses, uh, about the dead in order not to frighten its citizens or, uh, in order not to say to pay some kind of material compensation to the families of the dead, what did he say? sorry it's a talking head. this is a person who does not understand at all many of the things that she was given a figure. she read out that the lives of people are behind this, that even 10,000 were to say that 100,000 did not care, but pay attention to everything, the entire period of hostilities. in ukraine, only the

russian federation gives statistics on the dead for destroyed armored vehicles. i mean, she's real. there is a comparison. this is the base for analysis of people who know how to think, the statement fondlyayn is nothing more than information stuffing. and they speak correctly, they will not apologize to those. why because this stuffing on their own audience on the audience of the european union to show how terrible russians are. look, you remember. the first and last of the whole conversation. well, this is psychology, you can’t get anywhere without it. throwing was terribly 100.000. yes, in fact, this is a huge figure, but it was used once. there is nothing to compare with nothing to confirm that going on in ukraine for an ordinary european,

nothing is clear at all. he sees ukrainians running around their own cities, weighing nothing more, and sees their behavior, which is not shown in the media on the battlefield. everything is selective. let's say you are emasculated and staged as well. everything that concerns ukraine, the figure itself is very serious and very psychologically important for ukraine itself. what is 100,000? this is a big city, if you compare this decent amount, in all likelihood there are more victims. probably more i would probably agree with the russian statistics, which show 135,000 or more, but the first in ukraine is the arresters with him, they need to show their successes in the fight against the russians, show their own losses in such volumes. this is to sign in the inability to conduct

hostilities. or, in any case, in serious problems in this area, the second point is that this figure is the starting point for which the military department of ukraine must pay certain compensation to its people. and if you see this figure , this is a problem for the country, the amounts that they they said, yes, and the third point, because the information struggle. she goes constantly being arrested, we have success, we are advancing. we are chasing a russian swede, and so on and so forth, everyone is happy, everyone is happy to show the figure, ask, and who is chasing whom. and when the russian federation says that we have 10 times less losses, provided that the russian federation, according to all the canons of military science, so to speak, advance and should be, on the contrary, the question immediately arises. what is happening in these areas, where is the

huge assistance that the european union gives, after all literally a week ago, uh, they brought in the data, the united states, what can they do to help? ukraine correspond to their annual budget. can you imagine what it is about 47 billion dollars for this year. this figure is comparable to what they had to earn, they earned it is not clear, but this money went through ukraine the answer. you lost. so many people you uh got that kind of help. you said that tomorrow you will end the conflict on your terms, you are offered. let's negotiate. we refuse to negotiate. we are advancing. we destroy the russians. that's all for you, but here it is one figure, people who think can deduce certain ones from this, let's say, where these billions are. well

, something partially, of course, came to ukraine, i think, 10-15 percent. the rest of the village is in pockets. no, in general, a very interesting system, a huge part has gone. payment for what was delivered to ukraine and went to the development of the military-industrial complex in the united states to pay for their services partially to pay for the europeans, who provided the logistics and that's it. the rest, some meager sums were allocated for issues related to the support of the population of ukraine without this, there should be no information anywhere, a component, probably, considerable sums were allocated specifically for issues related to the media support of this conflict and its coverage in europe, its coverage in the media of various states. and, of course, the lion's share, which i spoke about earlier.

she was somehow called. it is so carried through the accounts of those who are interested in the development of the military-industrial complex part remained. to help those who organized this process somehow so well, from what you said, i understood that with money, so where is the exit where is the entrance, that is, the money returned to their sender , attention that even the media european information was discouraged that some ukrainians are buying expensive. uh, real estate in the european union at a time when the war is going on, where does the money come from? let's think about it. in the meantime, let's briefly remind you, we have a telegram channel. say don't be silent. subscribe to ask questions. and also suggest guests we are in touch. on the air

say it again, don't be silent. today i am visiting us doctor of military sciences professor nikolai buzin nikolai evgenievich, they are constantly trying to accuse us of cooperation with russia yes forgetting , and, for sure, i deliberately forget that we are still a union state with russia. well, what do you think irritates the west that it was not possible to make anti-russia out of belarus. as we say from ukraine, this is not the right word, it’s not just annoying for them, it was at a certain stage a huge failure, then there was a realization of that, and a serious internal disassembly. why did we do everything right according to our patterns. everything should have worked. and in principle, they almost reached their goal, including in 2020 it was indicated that they did not. likely. there were no such american studies. we have already brought them to professor ivanovsky with us, he shared exactly. american

researchers came to the conclusion that, most likely, it would not succeed in belarus, what good is the research of americans. uh-huh they do everything for good money day. this is the first and second task often put. what should be the result of a very strong rent corporation, because thousands of researchers often work smarter on the same problem in different interpretations. it 's clearly written there. and the nineteenth year of the studies of the twentieth year and 21 years. stretching russia, creating problems for her, the weakest place is belarus in 2020, than we were weak for them, this is a key link. uh, the impact on russia was and all the technologies that in the future it was planned to use in russia, including to destabilize the internal situation, everything that you can understand was launched on our territory, there is such a concept. the last one will be here is

2020. for them, this was probably a key event precisely in terms of showdowns with russia , if it had faltered then, belarus and we had become part of the european family, you can’t say otherwise, then not only russia would have problems and a lot could have happened . between the sea, the entire baltic of belarus, ukraine, all of russia was completely fenced. abdominal. i am the so-called flying time. before moscow, what's the problem? why is it so infuriating today, the united states in russia has, uh, certain types of weapons that no one has today, they clearly said through putin's mouth at one time that who needs a world where there is no russia and this really pulled them, because the most the main thing is that we will overwhelm you, you will either have two options, either you will fulfill our will, or you will not

succeed it did not work out in 2020, then they tried to destroy us when the events began in ukraine that there was the most powerful economic pressure, the most powerful such was never from the word never began. yes, in general. they are us with the planes then. yes, the first i was denied in the airspace was going on. it was all from there. so step by step the injection was sure. they were confident, based on the volume, so to speak. the russian economy in the general world that crush it elementary remember the discussion about swift, even russian analysts said, no, they will never turn it off. we've got them turned off. the flows exploded all kinds of embargoes that could only be accepted, but russia continues to live on its

own and belarus continues to live for them . imagine such a slap in the face, a small country, that belarus is there for them as a bargaining chip in the game, but it lives people smile tv channels come out. uh, they show the country . they come to visit us and say, lord, everything is fine with you. we live no matter what. yes , there are certain difficulties, but they are not of such a global scale. what they said in their opinion in 3-4 months. we were supposed to be naked bosses. uh, take to the streets uh, overthrow your own statehood and your own government and fall on your knees and say to the west we are ready take us to your place without you, we will die. why not? that is, they do not have any economic analysts, and they do not follow our mentality, they do not know belarusians. what then is why they had such expectations, the first in

understanding that we are great today and without us we allegedly have technology, and all the rest are subhuman. well barrel remember garden europe all the rest of the jungle. we are with you jungle but we this yes, for them we are their slaves, but at the same time, and we are such scoundrels and were also born white. well, this is this mistake of nature, you understand, it’s not, well, not completely, because, remember the fuhrer’s radio theory. you see, they really work on it, if you sort it out in deep, e understandings. yes, well, who with a different skin color, it goes without saying, but not all of us are like that either. here is the energy race. these are the rest of them - these are so subhuman slavs, but they are still working for us and dying in our interests. let them live as long as everyone does not lie, that's all, and let them contain. this territory, which is called a garden, is fertilized and

cultivated with their own sweat and blood. and we, the great ones, will catch the cream of this, but they don’t understand, europe has been empty for a long time, this is an empty continent that is dying from the point of view. e their resources, so to speak, from the point of view of their own population from the point of view. morality morality morality psyche degradation of man. as such, it is now coming from there, because rot, it is from there, therefore, we have nothing to take from them today, except perhaps partially those technologies that were discussed, these technologies are mainly created by us. well, when you gave an example, more than 70% of us silicon valley specialists come from the post-soviet space. today, more than 50% i say this at a minimum, more than 50% of teachers

, researchers, scientists in the usa come from all countries of the world, not the usa, the state should protect itself from brainwashing, because any of your speeches are some kind of skeptic. and where are our technical cars and so on, as soon as sanctions began, our cars appeared, artificial intelligence appeared, our own developments appeared, which never existed, they were, we just talked. why are we going to study? is this? where to take today not to take and there were brains. we said so, no far-sighted. we ourselves have created this situation, which today there is no disentangling. no, what we are good at, belarus we have a starting point starting point is our independence. she's not too big. it's a little over three decades. for the country. this is bullshit. i am i agree. and therefore, it is probably wrong to say that we created this, but the soviet

union once followed this path, but we clearly understand to develop without investing in our own economy. actually the science of their own people. you can’t, after all, today, please, when this was seen, all our medical diplomas are recognized, please come to us. everyone is friendly three four years ago, a huge list, so hmm idiot today, please, everyone, because there is not enough, because they clearly understand what we have have brains. we have education. we are high people. iq i agree. and i would like to add that i recently found out how the relocation of ours takes place. predators and laws are completely predatory. you yourself must rent apartments. you yourself have to worry about the visa, you yourself have to understand where you have a bank, that is, people are forcibly, how slaves are actually relocated to other countries and thrown there on conditions of survival. yes, but, as it were , our state system, which, perhaps, someone

criticized with such itself, does not allow you to agree completely that our state is trying to keep people trying to create the right conditions for them, but again, the informational impact of our youth shows you a picture. how beautiful it is. how is it? okay. come to us. well, this is the goebel option. well, just what do you think? it was just propaganda reality is completely different and they only see it when it's too late it's too late. yes, they are already sitting there, in addition to the fact that they create them there those conditions that it is difficult for them to return back and they give a little money for which they need to work for a certain time, but there are those, so to speak, projects, there are those hmm companies that will purposefully solve this problem and create good conditions for them, right away, but create for those who have already shown their level. well, not even that average level is quite in demand, because he is not there

, they are ready and know that give him over a thousand dollars. more he will be happy, but he is not but something some 1.000 dollars. these are unsecured pieces of paper, which, as much as i want, have as many prints that he will spend on renting and again, what to be there, of course, but in principle, we wanted to ask you philosophical questions, it was possible to consider such a situation now, so that belarus would be right. here they would hate the russians, as it happened in ukraine, theoretically, the theory of consciousness control is possible. this is a very deep hmm component and multifaceted. under certain conditions, with a powerful informational impact, despite the fact that the state will not take any measures to counter it, this can be made a reality. such is look at ukraine to somewhere

there was no such thing in 2000, then for 20 years a generation was trained, which now treats its closest neighbors in this way . that is, it is possible. this is possible in any country, provided that huge resources are involved, which, in principle, the west has the second moment, the state itself should either exaggerate this topic or not interfere with its development and third moment. a certain deterioration in people's lives is still needed in order to have someone to dump on. and if you show it like this, then it’s

possible, but based on the fact that how politics is built in our state about what we remembered about historical memory about what we now remembered, uh, about many questions that should have been a little earlier raise after seeing the ukrainian events. what kind of genocide belarusian society? this is real, look not only at the belarusian russian russian genocide, when hundreds of thousands of people are destroyed, when they shoot, they don’t shoot, they kill, let’s call the back of the head a shot. draw analogies. you don't have to go far forty-one-forty-fourth is our territory. what do you think, if such people come to power, something will change and there will be other methods. no, it's only worse. and who was going to come to power, we, well, you understand. uh, those who were leaders are not the people who should

have received preferences from the transition to power. everything could change very quickly to power. they came alone. others died for her, and the cream was removed third, but the people will never live better , and the state, as a rule. after that, either collapses or becomes a puppet, but your version of who benefit the recipient would be in the event of a coup? i’m not ready to say family by name, because you know, uh, history goes numb, the subjunctive mood could be and so on, but the fact that these would be representatives of the united west and you and i would continue to provide the garden with our slave labor and our resources is clear. but the head of the russian sergey lavrov's foreign ministry stated recently that the union state has taken all measures in the field of security in order to be ready and listen to any options the union state has

plans for military development. we have a joint grouping, and it has a land component, an air component, and our president is paying the highest attention to this problem, given the ongoing provocations, including from ukraine and all the necessary ones. u measures, uh, maintaining readiness any option accepted i assure you that we will rely on our allied state, its capabilities are good, and in the theory of military science there is such a concept as strategic deterrence. here's what. sergey lavrov just said that this is a strategic deterrence for belarus. this element of strategic containment is one of the elements. uh, another element of static retention. i will remind you of 2020. huge crowds of incomprehensible people walk the streets. it is not clear what they want. well, a

grouping is being drawn to our borders at that moment, it was the russian federation, uh, that fulfilled another element of strategic deterrence, when significant airborne forces were deployed to our territory, including landings and exercises in the near state border. this is also an element of strategic deterrence. and most importantly, the phrase that was spoken through the mouth of the president. we will provide the russian president. we will give our ally all the necessary assistance. this is the same element of strategic deterrence , it became clear to everyone the following rattling, or an attempt to move into our territory - this is a red line for russia and it will not stop and we will not stop to protect our national integrity at that moment, as far as strategic containment is concerned. it has a diversified system. this includes our today's broadcast. this is also an element of strategic deterrence. we communicate to

our population to the people who listen to us. the position of the country of the possibilities of our military organization, what we can do if necessary. and in general, look now in every family i have to tell very often lately. just in everyday life there will be a war or not, the answer will not be. provided that you and i will live and do each in his place his own business. there is the army, which performs its functions, there is the ministry of internal affairs, which solves its tasks, and there is the state security committee, which solves its tasks. there are people. we are with you, who, each in his own place, ensures national security, because it is multifaceted and good. our military industry is our impromptu. e, capable of meeting the needs of the belarusian army. at

basically, yes, uh, practically the entire line needed. we are ours in terms of weapons produced today by our enterprises and precisely. the state approach is precisely the attention to this direction on the part of the head of state that has allowed us to be in these positions today. today we do not produce, only we do not produce airplanes and helicopters, but we repair them at our enterprises. everything else we can do on our own. if we are supplied with helicopters. we, at least we already have them we have already purchased them in advance in the required quantities for the needs of our armed forces, now the development of the armed forces of the development of the organization of the state is underway, and yes, we are bathing what we need within the framework. union, including within the framework of a union state. after all. pay attention, no one will give anything to anyone. the war began, everything ended

in deliveries in all directions. do what you want, but today we have our own capabilities, our own resources, our own production, which allow us to do all this. we have reserves are determined. which we created, that is, we provided not only the armed forces, but also in the future also territorial defense, and everyone who is ready to stand up for the defense of the fatherland, there are weapons for this. we have the resources for this and it was created by our people, including the gossland, because let's pay attention. well, we make cars on our own as a machine. we make our own firearms. we do it ourselves. uh, communication systems do our own rap systems. we make our own unmanned aerial vehicles. we even make ammunition on our own, which we have never had before. own production. we have now started to produce on our own. whose merit is it for our tour of our state of the people,

just around the training ground. let's take a short break. after that, we will return to this studio again, while subscribe to our telegram channel. say be quiet. leave your comments. offer us guests, and all our issues. and bristles on youtube channel belarus 1 together with the stars, expert psychotherapists always when a person has some kind of unrealistic. the goal is not achieved, which in itself is understandable. it can always be justified. you must have left something unfinished, let's discuss current topics that we face every day. you have limited checks, please bring, i 'll see what you spend on. so here is the total control of a woman who works as a muse and a keeper of the hearth. she risks

that one day. she will cease to be interested in her man to safely resolve any conflict situations man between the base to work with their roots. for which his tree did not cling. look in the program for the concept of harmlessness on belarus 24 tv channel. dreaming of traveling, but you don’t know where to start pictures from the past did not arise by chance. after all, we are heading to one of the oldest cities in belarus, where we will tell about the most beautiful and interesting cities of belarus on a tour. the inhabitants of this city are happy people on the central square. has its own big ben. height 13 m. we will show. the main attractions are the monuments of cyril of turov installed on castle hill on may 13, 1993.

commemoration day of the saint and share historical facts. it is known that on june 23, 1944, the legendary operation from bagration began from here. look at the program of the city of belarus on our tv channel. doctor of military sciences, professor nikolay evgenievich nikolayzin but your military career began at the suvorov military school, if i'm not mistaken, you graduated with honors. in general, from childhood you dreamed of becoming a military man, at that time there was a serious attention in this direction. my father saw the war well knew what it was? and the profession of defending the motherland has always been, so to speak, a priority in my

family. at least over time. i realized that this is the direction. to which i wanted to devote myself, despite the fact that i was finishing physics from school, i had a very good education. but in general, to enter a stern school. it was very difficult 10 people per seat. it was at that time, competitions, engineer engineer. i'm also a techie. well, as i see it, traditions are not interrupted in your family. do you have a son and does he have any relations, by the way, photos here at once three generations will be theirs, this is you, this is your son and your father, father is no longer there, unfortunately, his son is already 22 years old. he already did lieutenant's epaulettes. well, he managed to combine my direction and the direction of my mother, my wife is a doctor. i am a military doctor, he is a military doctor, so as not to offend any of the parents. yes, deliver there were more children, then, probably, there would have been more choice for him to go. no, i think it's a child.

well, your scientific activity is not only your any, scientific activity takes away. uh, very a lot of strength. we know that you are the author of many monographs, and we cannot name them, because some of them are classified as secret, but nevertheless, for sure, you sometimes have free time. e, as you recover, rest and gain strength. i hope that someday there will be grandchildren. what to do in more detail, while i draw quite professionally, i deal with those issues. i read a lot and work outside the city. sometimes i garden. this is a completely unexpected answer for me, because , rather than imagine what you are drawing in what they least that this is a landscape and portraits including, wow, and portraits here by order or only

to me. i never work under the order, thank god i do not need it, unfortunately, the soul of the great generals. believe me completely, but you have the world of the suvorov school, and for us guys. it was the eighty-sixth eighty-eighth year of the thirty-second graduation of the minsk suvorov school for us, of course, there was someone an example at that time, it was alexander vasilyevich suvorov and, in principle, a person who not only devoted himself to military affairs, but also reached very great heights in this area, but you had your own passage through the alps in your life, probably not one, but probably the most difficult. it was. the doctoral dissertation connected with the defense was defended in moscow a very difficult enough time when you are in a foreign territory and left to yourself, you have to do everything yourself and convince

everyone that you are not a fool. it was very difficult to succeed. well, maybe another question. i'm interested here. well, we're talking about warlords. we suppose some kind of strategy. that is, we can understand the logic of movements. yes, today one gets the impression that, well, all the rules are already from now on. yes, you yourself said that even political systems, costs, balances do not work and the rules do not work either. but then when you look at the map there in today’s special operations there, for example, even russia in ukraine, you see the logic in actions, of course, in order to understand what is happening at the moment, you need to rise above the problem, that is, not to look at a separate component, but climb and see the whole picture. well, i would say that there are not so many people who are able to think. at this level, this requires a very large amount of information, not only operational information, but also historical information and knowledge in various

fields. this does not apply to the military component only, it is both politics, the economy and the technical component and, probably, uh, the social component. today it plays the most important role, a very serious market. well, and most importantly, er, the ability to analyze and anticipate some issues, if we are talking about anticipating what you will say there are different opinions about when the special operation will end, you are ready to say today, when and with what or not. i don't like forecasts and i always think that a forecast should be based on real information. it is only from information that one can make a forecast, but in the near future one cannot say that russia and ukraine will find common ground. in any case, one of the stages associated with the prompt completion of this conflict on the territory of ukraine is being played out. i may already

i repeat the reorganization of the world. there are too many stakeholders, too many funds and interests are present, and this is a process of multi- factorial dynamics of the situation such that new elements have to be constantly added to this mosaic. in today's situation, we can say that the likelihood of a quick end to the conflict is not very likely that the parties, and in this case the expanse, do not need to talk about ukraine and russia, they need to talk about russia. the united states may be partially the european union they will find common ground and everything will return to its own way, there is no need, and in general the world will not be the same as it was before this operation in the near future, and hmm, again, returning to your first answer. he likes me that

statements from responsible people, also professionals of your colleagues, appear in the information space from the other side, who say that the united states is behaving irresponsibly. you know this. this is a true statement. after all, there have always been people in the world who found the strength to say the truth. yes, remember that, and the manhattan project , nuclear scientists, who clearly signed even documents , this is the same kissinger, who quite recently, however, he is already many years old and he is out of politics as such, but he said that it is necessary to find common ground and those people who appear on the other side, if they do not play in the interests of information confrontation, and in the interests, so to speak, of influencing consciousness. this is also possible, in principle, they say, common sense should be rules, but rules should, uh, take into account the interests all players. they are orders to one side, to the other today this period is over there is china

there is russia there is india there are a number of other states that have the potential for much more than the united states of america thank you very much for this conversation for your forecast. we tatyana shcherbina victoria popova say goodbye to you today. goodbye. goodbye. and now nikolai buzin says today it is not necessary to say that national security is some kind of secondary concept. the fear of war makes people. commit completely incomprehensible acts but on the belarusian earth there are forces, there are means, there is a political will to ensure. quiet life and development in today's burlyach world, our country is small.

a corner of calm. i hope that it will continue in this way to save the world, save your home, educate the new generation. this is what we have to do in the short term, avoiding escalation. let's hope that the new world will be kinder, more organized and apparently more accessible to each of us. do good live the way you want without forgetting that you have a home. you have family and roots.

smart, erudite and inquisitive guys, i said no, because i thought that 3 million people for the 16th century was too much of a population. in fact, i don’t know, but it seems to me that this assumption will show its best qualities to everyone, which means that he did not teach and those who did not know geometry will solve many tasks. it will be 81 if i'm not mistaken. it will be 64 answer to questions from different areas of scientific knowledge. i know

on tv channel belarus 24. noon news live on belarus 1 in the studio vladislav bundere hello, watch the releases of the social orientation of the budget for next year more funds for pensions and benefits the draft laws were adopted in the house of representatives in the first reading