in germany, he shared with journalists the details of the economic situation and spoke about rising prices for german consumers. well, of course, they do not always have a very negative effect, especially on ordinary residents. uh, so even compare the prices that were last year this year because of the sanctions. they have grown noticeably. ah, food, for example, uh, let's say that the european union has adopted sanctions against the processing of, uh, belarusian, yes, and the cost of firewood in germany has almost doubled. yes, people uh express. uh process tests e does not agree with the sanctions with an increase, the participants of the meeting of the advisory council for belarusians, abroad will take stock of the joint work, determined the prospects for development and plans for the future. neighboring and control services continue to issue transport with delays , according to the information of the state border committee of belarus over the past day. largest collection of trucks.

it was fixed in front of the lithuanian checkpoint with a dent in our kamenny log on this route, the adjacent side issued less than a third of the trucks from norms, the polish and latvian control services allowed about half of the trucks to enter their territory. over the past 24 hours, delays in the registration of passenger cars at the entrance to the eu were recorded only at polish checkpoints for probes and the interest field of their control services issued a little more than a third of the author of the norm. russia is considering three responses to the introduction of a ceiling on oil prices from the russian federation by the g7 countries and the european union. it is possible that the measures involve a complete ban on the sale of oil to states that have introduced a price ceiling, a ban on the sale of raw materials contracts including. as a condition for the price ceiling, as well as the introduction of the maximum discount , the statements are reported according to the information of the publication. at the moment, none of these options has been approved, perhaps other alternatives or a combination of them. early bloomberg wrote that moscow was considering setting a fixed price for

oil as a response to price restrictions. more news from my colleague yulia pertsova at 3:00 pm. i say goodbye to you until we meet at the first button. the program sas is authorized to declare i am the host nadezhda sas greetings i will remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of each of the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. we'll tell you right now, the head of the european commission, ursula fondyrlyan, has suddenly made a big hole in ukrainian official

propaganda. just by naming the figure of 100,000 when describing the losses of the armed forces of ukraine, a german. i wanted to emphasize the horrors of the russian invasion, but did not take into account the fact that the zelensky regime carefully hides losses at the front from its own citizens. fearing the truth to undermine their faith in victory, the fonderlein’s revelation caused such indignation in kiev that a fragment of the speech of the head of the european commission was even cut out of the one posted on her page in file, and the press secretary of the european commission began to prove that we are talking about the total number of killed and wounded all. this only increased interest in the topic and helped to disperse an important myth of the news. moreover, in ukraine it has long matured dissatisfaction with the concealment by the authorities of the scale of losses among military personnel. in china, the most massive protests in the last 30 years are taking place, the reason for student unrest was dissatisfaction with

the authorities' strict quarantine measures, forcing hundreds of thousands of people to stay in isolation for weeks and months, for cases of coronavirus detected in one or another group. the so-called zero-tolerance covid policy, when the broad masses are simply not allowed to get sick with the virus. and thus aggregate with vaccination to get a collective immunity has long been criticized by experts. in addition, it leads to significant losses for the national economy. yes, and ordinary chinese in their mass are less afraid of infection. than having to live in near-permanent quarantine, though there are no signs yet that the protests will force the authorities. china to change the approach of the event. in china, belarusian observers were allowed to note that the strategy of combating the pandemic chosen by the leadership of our country turned out to be more. capable of implementing medical measures without creating extraordinary additional difficulties for the economy and society this week in minsk said goodbye to

vladimir makei, the minister of foreign affairs died on november 26 a funeral service was held in the house of officers. the president of belarus was one of the first to go there. the last journey of the outstanding political figure was seen off by relatives of colleagues, top officials of the country and ordinary belarusians, an endless list of condolences was sent to relatives and friends also from representatives of authorities, public and political figures and for during his entire career, vladimir makei was a true patriot of belarus, he developed the best traditions of belarusian diplomacy and did everything to strengthen the authority of our country in the international arena. yes, i want to note that vladimir vladimirovich makei was a supporter of a

multi-vector approach, which contributed to the successful development of the state and the successful foreign policy of the republic of belarus. but today we will talk a little about the future of the world system. about the future of the world order and i want to note that the english historian alan taylor once wrote and although formally, the meaning of achieving the status of a great power is to acquire the ability to fight in a big war. only by avoiding such a war can one remain a great power for a long time and the wisdom of a great sign such a history of diplomacy indicates that despite the bellicose rhetoric, all the leading powers of the world strive to build a system of relations that will prevent a world war. and what kind of system will it be and how much does it seem to be in it? poles we 'll talk about today's program. i am pleased to

alexey dzermond is already present in our studio. political scientist good evening and viktor nikolaevich litovkin military observer taz political scientist of the russian federation hello good evening and first of all we start our program with millet blitz, superpower. still alone or no longer alone? what do you think alexey in my opinion, it is definitely not the only one. although, she leads a very serious bloc, the western bloc, and together with the allies, uazia, uh, and this bloc is trying to maintain its hegemony, but this is no longer it turns out, neither in the economy nor in the military-political sphere, so this is most likely. a declining hegemon against the background of the fact that new superpowers have emerged and are growing, that is, we are at the moment of transition from a

unipolar model to a multipolar one, or in any case more diverse. yes, but viktor nikolaevich, please, or what to call a superpower? this is very important, yes, whether it is a superpower economically, or militarily, or military-politically. well, in general others in the development of human freedom of human freedom of speech and so on and so forth, so here you can talk differently, but certainly always one of the superpowers generally accepted. this is the united states. but if china, which is in no way inferior in economic terms, the united states, in terms of per capita income, even surpasses it. the united states walks the latest data, yes , a diplomat candidate of political sciences joins our air. well, i think you are following our

conversation, which has just begun, i offer you answer the blitz question superpower. still alone or no longer alone, and in general, what criteria are necessary to meet the status of a superpower. i greet the distinguished participants in the discussion and the audience of your program. uh. i think that, nevertheless, according to this criterion, let's say, the key one in my understanding for a great power. it's the possession of a power that, uh, is greater than all the other greats. step combined. um, probably, even the united states today cannot be called a full-fledged superpower. that is, they are one and only cash is really without what is near the block of the state that they rely on their own can not resist. let's say. so this is an incredible situation, of course, in which everyone united against the united states about this. but if this happened, the united states themselves could not cope with this, therefore, by and large, if you

approach it very strictly, then probably there is not a single one in the world today. superpowers. although, of course, of course, the united states stands for this status. much closer than any other country in the world. it's easy, see victor nikolaevich correctly noted. let's still define our definition, please, colleagues. on the screen what is a superpower, so that everything becomes clear and understandable to our viewers, a superpower is an independent state with huge cultural, political, economic and military potentials, including a superpowerful nuclear potential, a superpower has superiority over most other states, which allow it to exercise hegemony not only in its region, but also in the most remote places planets. by what criteria, in your opinion, is it worth ranking a power, because, if you look purely in terms of economic indicators, germany also seems to be a more powerful player on the world stage than even the russian federation, although in

practice we understand that this is absolutely not the case. and if we are talking about a specific leader, yes, here is today's germany of mr. schulz, but it looks like an absolutely spineless state. well, in my opinion. here in this definition is. uh, the key thing is super-powerful nuclear capability in my opinion after all, a superpower must have this criterion. that is, if the state has such a potential that it can destroy the enemy or even the entire planet. this is already a sign, at least for superpowers. this means that you are already included in the strategy game around the future is simply nuclear weapons, for example, north korea but also has israel but here is the ability to destroy the enemy, the united states for example, or even the entire planet. this is a sign that you will already be spoken to differently. everyone

the rest, it means that you are recognized by certain ones. this superstatus, which is not available even to some other nuclear states viktor nikolayevich do you think that without nuclear weapons in the modern world a state can not defend its own? of course, so well, here is kim jong-un has a nuclear weapon. and no matter how many sanctions are announced to him, no matter how many claims are made against him, no matter how he is given. nobody touches his state. here, adam hussein and lokadah did not have nuclear weapons. we we know what happened to them. yes, donald trump drove three strike aircraft carrier formations on each aircraft carrier , 90 aircraft, to the waters of north korea. he promised to turn north korea into a radioactive field. and that he quickly got out of there, because he was afraid of an attack on american military bases in south korea, and here

is another key word in my opinion. an independent state is important. well, france has nuclear weapons. uh, the uk is they independent states? i would question this question . why? because both countries are members of nato, and any country that is a member of nato, it signs that it allocates part of its sovereignty to its independence headquarters in nato's headquarters, and in fact washington, so today is not biden travels to paris to agree on how to conduct nato's policy, and macron travels to washington and tries to negotiate with washington and biden on how to live on. let's take a look at the map where marked potential superpowers, please alex in your opinion. european union. we can

call it this unification of the state, as there is no superpower. at the moment, the first question is this is the power of the state. and this is a hybrid between an international organization and some kind of bloc with signs of a federal structure, but we also understand that in political and military-political terms, as the european union has already said here, and even the most independent sovereign, allegedly its states. such as the they are subordinate to france anyway, uh, or brussels, and in the form of the eu and nato or washington, that is, the european union. in my opinion, he does not have a sufficient degree of sovereignty and sovereignty in order to make decisions in his own interests. that is why he is now suffering in many respects from those sanctions, uh, which are introduced, let's say, higher-ranking ones. players. yes, but with this, remember the legendary question. uh, gentleman from stalin how many

divisions does the pope have and at the same time the real influence of the vatican on world diplomacy is very significant oleg here question to you. here is a rather interesting question, if the united states of america after 1945 was still the strongest country in the world. why is washington working so hard to create and develop various alliances, although the same donald trump, the forty-fifth president of the united states, believed that america should play alone. yes. uh, the main task is to make america strong again, and in fact, in terms of the number of allies, the united states, of course, no one can compare, and even russia's tandem china and still a little from another. well, actually, the united states, when they need it, and act, in general, alone. uh, without much regard for their even formal most important allies. we can recall the war in iraq in 2003, which was also very openly and consistently opposed by france and germany

. that did not prevent, for example, the family states from undertaking an invasion of iraq, neglecting the opinion of the allies, and many other similar situations. not only under trump, under other presidents. now a big scandal is unfolding between the european union and the united states regarding an infinition reduction ac, that is, legislation to reduce inflation , adopted by the united states, which provides for a number of subsidies for american industry, which can very seriously undermine the position of european industry, and this is absolutely not allied behavior, but, nevertheless, the united states in this visibility. why do they rely on unions in two things, first, it is clear obvious. and the simplest answer is that, of course. they are just the same they shift part of the time, and the economic losses of human costs e expenses for the same military operations and so on to other countries, but, more importantly, something else. uh, the united states is unlike any other country. today, claiming status. e of the great power, especially

since there is a potential superpower has a certain ideology, it does not claim to be universalism. that is, to promote your set of values ​​on your geological agenda to the whole world in this situation. naturally, is the creation of a circle of countries that demonstrate commitment to this particular geological platform is in this. the key situation with the union after all, when we say the same west, they call themselves that. these are defined there with reservations. naturally, not everything is so simple, but forgive everything. this is a certain set of values ​​and it is not so important, for example, what specific formal relations are associated, the united states, for example, with japan or with australia or with new zealand, everything is perfect. it is clear what is there on the key issues in relation to the future of humanity? to the rules behavior and so on, the united states for example new zealand the united states and italy the united states and poland are on the same side of the barrier, for example, the united states and the chinese the united states or the republic of belarus as a whole is on the

other side of the barrier viktor nikolaevich and how are you can you characterize the role of medium-sized states such as saudi arabia, the same iran, turkey in the future of the world system. i think these states are ebritain. e their true independence and sovereignty today, they are developing and now economic development of these states, military development, it allows, uh, to raise their voice for the protection of their national interests. here you are the same turkey. pay attention to how turkey confronts the united states when the turks bought our s400 complex, yes, an anti-aircraft system. i speak for our listeners. what kind of pressure was exerted here pay attention to greece was the s-300 complex. yes, also a member of nato or there were no problems there. but turkey, i bought 400 , which means problems, because they are connected e to the nato system, uh, about the general on it, and so on

, put pressure on turkey, turkey put up, despite the continuation of blackmail. yes, to the attempted coup d'état in turkey and many other things that are still happening in turkey and turkey, uh, persistently pursues its national policy, the same thing in saudi arabia. you remember that saudi arabia has always been a gas station of the united states and today saudi arabia refuses, uh, the president follows president biden in boosting oil production. yes, and proudly. e even unhealthy hand in hand with this president, too, to defend their interests. well, so are other states that are weakening today. on the one hand, the united states, the hegemony of the united states, yin is weakening, and against this background, their independence, their character , their ability to withstand pressure , these states that you called oleg, please give you a word. the international system is,

first of all, how the relations between the great powers, that is, its key nodes, are built, and the rest of the states. e can influence or influence, of course, in one way or another on these connections. but uh, if we remember why the system is called, for example, bipolar yes, that, apart from the soviet union and the united states, there were no other states there, dozens were quite powerful, like in the same china india there to some extent, there yugoslavia and so on , but bipolar, because there were two superpowers, there was a european concert, the new of which is that there are five key great powers interacting with each other, therefore, of course, middle-sized states and even small ones, which have, say, strong-willed leaders and know their weak strengths, having them to play in time for a contradiction. great lies can but influence the development of the international system. but, otherwise what the system will become as a whole really depends on the nodes, so we will look at the same turkey rogan, he is applying everything. strength for turkey by the time e, when it settles down, but

the international system. and it will probably take 5-10 years there, but it has reached the level. well, let's say if it has not reached, for example, there is the influence of the same russia and india, but at some point it has approached. eh, to show in a whole series or that is, but simply to count on the fact that turkey can be, for example, or iran a state of the second plan, but those who will create the nodes of the system will reckon with it. this is naive, therefore, and the key will be who sits at this big table. here, relatively speaking, there is a new one, yalta. yes, if it takes place there, let the president of russia be there, let's say the leader of the prc is a leader. it's more or less. well, there, if something such a dramatic thing will not happen, these three representatives will be 100% like whatever their names are. yes. and who else is fighting for this now, and the same active position of turkey, also the vigorous activity of iran, is aimed at trying as much as possible up to an attempt to create weapons, as in the case of iran, i do not exclude. turkey will follow this path, and jump to this

level in order to be at the same table almost on an equal footing, well, relatively on an equal footing with russia , china and the united states, please tell us, here we are first the interest of the republic of belarus, if i may say so, is how a state such as belarus today builds its foreign policy and how to behave correctly in order to remain always strong during this period of transformation and to be considered with you, firstly, you need to correctly assess the current the moment we are in. unfortunately, the estimates are extremely alarming, in fact. we are on the front line. in this struggle, it is important, first of all, to defend the security of the country, so that our opponents in the west do not have at least the slightest doubt about it. that any of their attacks, sabotage, provocation, will meet the

toughest response. this is, in principle, the first condition for them to understand that war is inevitable in this case, a large-scale war. eh, this is where all negotiations begin, as soon as the enemy understands that you are strong, then they will not attack you, but will try to negotiate further. if we agree, we must show that we are not just there isolated by someone. yes, we have our blog our allies. this is the immediate environment post-soviet, let's say space, therefore, you will have to work as allies in order to rally them into a more disciplined union, plus allies of the far arc. well, first of all, china, iran , perhaps, india. here in this configuration, when we hold out, we will show our strength in the form of a bloc, uh, with the closest allies and allies a little further away on these terms. we can agree, and naturally in this configuration we will have our own

voice and our own position. i am sure of this. by the way, at the collapse of the unipolar world, he expressed his intention and president of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko let's listen, the world will no longer be the same, the united states is no longer a monopoly on decision-making for other countries and continents, the unipolar order is collapsing and new centers of power are emerging. this and china this and india this and russia the countries of the middle east latin america the world is waking up. therefore, trying to keep control from the world's policeman , the united states turns into a world terrorist. you know, i would like to note that formally, alliances are currently fading into the background and now is the time of states with their own course with their own vision and the time of bright leaders. and here, notice. we remembered, not in vain, mr. scholz, or else we will

take it. yes, here is a state that is larger in territory in terms of military potential than the republics of belarus, but there is no bright, intelligible leader in foreign policy, and therefore no one considers the opinion of the state. i share your opinion about the leader, of course, the state must be a bright leader, that's for sure. this is the man who should lead the nation determine the tasks of the goal of this nation and by his personal example he unites the nation, but i do not quite agree with you about the fact that the allians are losing their place in the world war today, depending on which alliances, if it's like nato where subordinate to the united states and play according to the rules established by the united states, no one needs such an alliance, because it is and the united states is the exploiter of this alliance. yes, but the alliance is such as brix where all equal states and they united in order to

to cooperate together on equal terms, respecting each other, taking into account national interests , and so on and so forth. i think that such unions should be increased, there should be more of them, but certainly there should be national leaders who will defend the national interests of this or that state. that's about the european union, after all. let's pay attention, after all. uh, now there are no leaders in europe who are able to defend national interests. and this is no coincidence. it is the united states that educates these people. all of them have been trained in the united states. the united states has done. eh, as if the filters are such that e to power, no one can come. yes, there is lipen in france, yes, a wonderful woman who will put aside national interests, where she elects some kind of macron, it is not known where he came from, yes, an assistant to relatives. i don't want to offend

my husband and my teacher. yes, here. well, is it the leadership of a person who and so on and so forth. well, i am bitter for france yes, please tell me, in your opinion, if say the united kingdom could take a certain place in the multipolar world, if the concept of global britain has a chance to come true, or if we are talking about the need to have a bright leader, in this case there is none in britain. or maybe you disagree with me, by the way this is an interesting example of multifaceted, uh political process, there really are uh, nations are cultures political cultures traditions, where really

uh, the absence of a strong leader leads to form getting the inevitable chaos of decay and so on and vice versa, uh differently built uh structures, where there is a very strong consolidated stabilization, which has its own environment. in general, it can single out a strong leader, it may not. uh, there are not so many such politicians, let's say political associations, but even in great britain this is a vivid example, and there are few countries where we can observe such a political that you are what happens regularly in the united kingdom. even this year we watched, well, just phantasmagorically, but circus stories related there with crises with a course through 40. and after coming to after with, in fact, as some joke, listra became prime minister. only to worthily see off the last journey of the english queen or the cherished, there and so on. this is the only thing she will be remembered for, but no one will deny that, for example, in the same conflict in ukraine, in many other stories of great britain, she plays a very, very

significant role. it has a colossal intelligence apparatus much more competent than many other intelligence agencies, often than the american society will divorce, and it has the status of one of the financial centers of the world. sometimes one gets the impression that this could be saxon, but these are not tandems of them there five-phase, the so -called there in the main five countries, but let me remind you that in addition to the united states of great britain. canada australia e. new zealand and what exactly is he, and not washington, leading in this five saxon countries, that is, in the absence of a leader, and sometimes with such enough. well, let's say, leaders under whom any state space has long collapsed great britain manages to remain a key poppy about the strength of the political class great britain its great tradition and the fact that there really are some societies in which the presence of a strong leader would even be harmful to this society the same, by the way, partly applies to the united states of america and we

remember the features of mr. trump and the current president, to be honest, too. well, far from theodore roosevel, you know, and frankente was not frank on the russian unit. one roosevelt and not wilson few others not reagan and few others great leaders of this state, but nevertheless, no one cancels the fact that the united states, by virtue of the fact, again, here is the structure, why do i say the structure they occupy such a place for the first time, for example, the financial system, what can you know, there e comedian from talk show put the head of this country, and the result will be absolutely oleg really. i would like to talk now about the differences of the present moment. bipolar system and i would like to quote an american historian world war ii left only two states, america and the ussr, in a state of political ideological and military dynamism, making them capable of filling

the resulting power vacuum, wrote arthur schlesinger, and it would be truly amazing if there were no cold war, but a bipolar system of international relations. more details in our story, world war ii completely destroyed the multipolar model of the world. previously leading powers such as great britain germany italy france japan were either defeated and occupied, or seriously weakened world became bipolar new system of international relations headed by the former military allies of the ussr and the united states, it was the nature of their relationship that began to determine the course of international development as a whole. there, since the physical survival of all mankind depended on the dialogue between the two nuclear superpowers, and nuclear weapons themselves became the most important structural component of the future cold war between the soviet union and the united states. a confrontation unfolded

under irreconcilable ideological slogans, two superpowers began dividing the world, while actively interfering in the affairs of third countries and seeking to win them over to their side by any means, however, not being able to fight openly with each other, the united states of the soviet union resisted with the help of transatelites, everything from financial assistance was used to direct military support. the aggravation of the conflict happened after the us deployed medium-range missiles in turkey, the distance was enough for them to fly to moscow and a number of other large cities the soviet union in response to this, the ussr placed its missiles in cuba, however, a nuclear war was avoided. and the final stage of the cold war was the total collapse of communist regimes in many countries of the world, the end of the cold war led to colossal shifts in the balance of power on the world stage and to the end of the bipolar system of international relations. yes, alexei, you know our

brain is arranged in such a way that it is easier for us to perceive certain things through analogies. and so, for example, the confrontation between moscow and washington immediately started talking about a new cold war, but in fact, the situation is radically different and at least there is no clear ideological confrontation, because today russia is groping for a conservative ideology, as a counterbalance to hmm globalist posthumanism, although there are quite a lot of conservatives among the republicans. and yet a. what is the main difference you see between the state of affairs today and the cold war period? well, first i'll argue a little about yours about the absence of an ideological factor. that is, he is absent. uh, as if from the russian side left the only ideology of communism, yes, but russian society or russian civilization. it is also based on certain

deep-seated values, which remained even when they were combined with communism. it turned out to be the soviet system, and then there was such a view. these are ideologies. now, for example, there is no mandatory communism. but there are some things they are in the form of conservatism, or they can be in the form of purely geopolitical logic. yes, but all the same, these are the things that determine western relations. elite russia has not gone anywhere, so i would not flatter myself with the illusion that the ideology has gone. she just took on a new shape. but, what is the difference and what to make the listing situation much more dangerous after all, when yes, there are two players of a large superpower between them, here is the tension of the conflict caribbean crisis. they then agree on some rules, then the process of agreement is launched to reduce and contain the arms race there. they develop some kind of rules of interaction warning from each other about the danger. now look at all this the system of practically an agreement has collapsed no.

and this, well, let's say a direct dialogue. he is, of course, there are special services. all this is there just in case, it is preserved, but the security architecture collapsed and nothing new came in its place. and this means even more vulnerability has appeared and some incidents may arise. and how to work with them, if you need to find out, here comes a submarine with nuclear weapons, this is a danger to russia or the usa but there can be many such moments and therefore the situation is much more dangerous than in the first cold war. viktor nikolayevich well, you are, first of all, a military observer. tell me, please, that the reorganization of the world always took place on the basis of global wars. is this time it's inevitable, well, a global war. i think it is being pushed back because while russia has nuclear missile weapons no less than the united states, but note here

is a treaty on the reduction and restrictions of streltsov offensive weapons. the latest treaty between russia is united to the states. only we and the united states have this treaty based on equal forces. yes, the united states was forced to conclude this treaty, the united states was forced to extend this treaty. although trump did not want to renew it. he tried to blackmail us, but biden just came to the white house, and he was immediately one of the first decrees that he signed this agreement to extend it for 5 years, that is, the united states. well, the word afraid will probably be wrong, but c respect for our nuclear missile potential, and yet the united states is trying to destroy our country with other third parties, so i think that this is a global war. she, of course, is on the

doorstep. she threatens us, but the fact that it will happen and i hope that it definitely won’t happen during my lifetime. i would also like to draw attention to our plasma to draw a map of the spheres of influence of the soviet union of the united states of america at the final stage, and the cold war states that were allies of the soviet of the green union of the united states of america, alexey , i’m reading an important difference between moscow’s current line and the position of the soviet union precisely in the fact that today’s russia is in no hurry to finance allies around the world, there are a number of close states that receive some financial assistance, some support, but still it is impossible to compare with those billions that the soviet union invested only in africa alone, or even some

of their own citizens at that moment suffered from this. in this sense, a new confrontation between the greats, powers. here, in your opinion, does not mean a certain amount of assistance for third world countries. well, because as we say superpowers, this is a state that can see it influence other states and the influence can be different, both ideological and financial. well, here's the question. uh, let's just say in ambition, as far as i can see, while russia does not show global ambitions. she would like to have a security sphere in eurasia but, well, perhaps some kind of relationship with allies on other continents, but first of all , it is about russia's own security and the near environment. uh, therefore, it naturally makes sense to invest in far abroad countries to set especially friendly regimes there. no for today . this is for now. well, russia can change its strategy a little. if y wins

. if it starts, let's say a slightly different alignment. well, so far so, uh, and then what else? the question is, for the sake of which certain countries of the americans are supported, they still invest money in a friendly regime in order to, well, keep global hegemony or someone contain, that is, along the perimeter. china, russia, friendly regimes are put in there, money is pumped in so that they restrain russia’s opponents, respectively. either china, let’s say, for the time being, no one really has such a task, even the chinese, if they invest latin america in africa first of all, well, actually the economic benefit of development for this is happening and they , of course, they get from there, that is, control over resources. now the logic has changed a bit. well, relatively speaking, the predators grappled with each other. here, who will come up with the logic after this struggle. that is, how can we, together on the planet, agree between the poles, which will already determine their strength and

the limit of the enemy's influence on them will be seen. then, perhaps, a slightly different situation will come, the same multipolar world. but until we test the limits of each other's strength, this will not come oleg, and the last question for you we are talking about the dialogue of the logical component of the policy of different states and today, indeed, every state that claims the status trying to form a superpower. ideological content, but tell me, if we are talking about a future multipolar world, how different ideologies are possible, how they can get along, because if we take the liberal agenda, which is now still taking over, in the lives of american citizens. and, of course, the emergency elites dream that this agenda of this ideology will capture the whole world. a very short remark on the previous part

of the discussion, if so. the united states today also does not particularly help anyone with finances, a key tool for influencing the elites of different countries. they have it today as a tool of punishment through a very well- designed, and in uh, well-thought-out. uh honed, so go ahead, the so-called fight against uh, international terrorism sanctions today. states can control almost any deal. e, passing conducted in dollars to euros or other currencies of western countries and e, let's say. here is a very simple example. yes, too, for example, serbia yes , with total support here, but let's say sympathy it is clear that russia is historically closer to china and so on, nevertheless, the leadership is pursuing a multi-vector balanced policy. you just understand that otherwise they will fall under uh, the most severe skating rink of financial punishment. and this is exactly what the united states controls so many elites today, including

in individual countries after this space and even in russia, influencing those who have houses and yachts and so on, because this is the mechanism by which to the united states today they can achieve more than if they just gave money to someone, they don’t even have to give money. they just know where who is. i'm sorry i stole it and they can either let them use it or they can seize it. this is the key tool by which the united states uh, today uh, governs the elite in many countries. they have corruption, they do not fight corruption, they manage corruption. this is an important element. e to understand what the american influence in many respects meanders today and about ideology very briefly, i will try to say yes indeed. eh, today. uh, there is a chance that, while russia will formulate a number of other countries, but this, by the way, is interesting, not in opposition to the west, but as part of the struggle for another west well, because , roughly speaking, we are still part of me, at least , this is how i perceive myself, many people my views are part of this large historical

christian there are christian people, if you want civilizations that are based, say, on the bible there on other sacred texts and with a certain set of values. in any case, for us, the same china, which in some ways can be close and understandable, but in general as a civilization. it 's completely different. we can't. well, i can’t imagine that for me, for example, the chinese were not the same as the germans, for example, yes, so, if we can, and along with those conservative christian constructive forces. which exist today both in the usa and in europe, let's say, to rebuild our relations and build these bridges from this and russia in this sense can play both russia and let’s say belarus and even ukraine in the future, anyway, i’m basically a christian, traditionalist society, but if i can play your role, then it’s really possible to qualitatively change the so-called west here. this, by the way, is actually the globalist cast afraid. why were they screaming so loudly all the time? stop

trump. and putin although there is no connection between them. in fact, there weren’t any collusions, in fact, there weren’t, but from the point of view, for example, the attitude towards lgbt, e.g., to family values and so on trump viktor orban in hungary alexander lukashenko in belarus uh rejepper dagan in turkey on the one hand, but macron. uh, biden, there are other proponents of this new lgbt new transgender ethic. and other things they are on the other hand, that's all, that is, in fact, re- russia and the west are not doomed to confrontation, they are doomed to confront traditionalist conservative societies, and so the globalist who is in the west today. yes, thank you, oleg voloshin, a diplomat, was in touch with us. program sas is authorized to announce that we are talking about whether a global concert of great powers is possible and let's remember that the names of such prominent diplomats

as prince toleyran, russian foreign minister alexander gorchakov, chancellor. otto von bismarck lit all these stars the era of the balance of power and the concert of europe, then diplomats needed to know many languages, to know history, to be able to beautifully express their thoughts, to find arguments and finally think, because everything was decided behind closed doors and in a dispute of equals now look at the head of the german foreign ministry she says with slogans that under the camera, that without sms-terrible, that for the amusement of the broad masses , diplomacy has turned into a show where everything is for show, but now i would like to remind our viewers. what was the european concert. the concert of europe is a system of international relations established by the consent of the great european powers in the period from 1814 to 1914 after the revolutionary and napoleonic wars, it

gave europe the longest period in history without major wars. the european concert was based on the principle of balance of power, ensuring unification groups of great powers against any claimant to sole behemonia, disputes were resolved through large-scale diplomatic congresses, where priority was given to multi-level, bargaining and behind-the-scenes agreements; the system ensured the flourishing of diplomatic art and the colonial division of the world by european powers. you know today in the mode of the frontal place of the project house-2. it is impossible to solve global issues, and that's why if a power wants to prevent a world war, a big war somehow they still need to return to classical diplomacy behind closed doors viktor nikolayevich what do you think? i highly doubt whether a global concert of the great powers of the whole day is possible, because no one has canceled competition and it

is impossible to cancel it. competition is the source of the development of the dialectical development of all states. therefore, yes, the diplomacy of the european concert was, uh, based on economic greatness and economic dependence depending on the state. russia is great, the grain power was i'm not talking about the fact that she was a great military power and europe was forced to reckon with her with such bread, that's how today we know the story of how you fumble bread from odessa. yes, he is ukrainian bread , russian bread is being brought out of novorossiysk, it turns out that there is again a great need for our bread. yes, and therefore some indulgences are being made for us for our country, but russia was the same in russia. after she defeated napoleon and everyone had to reckon with russia, we say there were no big wars. yes, there were big wars, the russian-turkish

war. remember the liberation of bulgaria. and remember, as alexander iii said without my permission, not a single gun fires in europe. it was e reckoned with russia had to be reckoned with, but there was astro, hungary was there was an alliance between germany and france, there was a conflict all the time. yes, there were english colonies, which, uh, in india, everything happened there. uh, the rebellion were the suppression of these. revolts also in indocia france and so on. each country had sources of economic power, at that time on to at that moment, yes, therefore they were forced to reckon with each other, but today there is the united states and there is the european union, with which the united states does not reckon, because the european union is already forced to act under e -e according to the requirements of the united states you. pay attention to a small

detail, the united states forced the european union to whitewash sanctions on us. the european union is losing a lot of money on these sanctions, while the united states continues to talk about sanctions. keep trading with us. they buy our wounds from 15 to 40% of american nuclear power plants operated by russian earlier. they buy our oil. they buy ours. uh, titan is not just titan , we make for boeings, e, components are on the territory of russia and titan did not fall under us. what males i will tell you more about the first flights of our gas carrier with liquefied gas. crosses de margine from sabet you know where he went along the northern sea route in the united states the very first voyage went to the united states we took there 350,000 cubic meters. e liquefied gas, so

the united states has been exploiting europe for its own interests both military and economic indeed since the second world war. this whole european concert turned its back on the soviet union unfortunately, but today it’s true that the european union, as an association of states, as the union has lost its power, is gradually turning into satellites of the united states of america. what do you think, in general , if we bring today’s multipolarity program to the final to be? of course to be, but for this i if only i had a little inner feeling and in russia we have me here, i would argue with a colleague who spoke on the link. he says, we are a european, a christian country, but after all, russia is not only a european, but also an asian country, and not only a christian, but also a muslim country, therefore, for a balanced sense of self, you need to feel like a eurasian country. yes, yes, there is a

european one, no one refuses it, but these hopes that the conservatives will come to power there, and we will again agree with them, this illusion. even if they come, well trump was 5 years old. and that he tried to get out could not agree. olim, she votes all the votes of the entire national front, the french adopts anti-russian resolutions and according to historical memory , and now, therefore, she hopes for right-wing traditional conservatives. this is an illusion, they do not need us as a strong subject, therefore, they need an internal one. how to develop nastya not only focused on europe and the west, but also on asia, they say, we will never understand each other with the chinese, and you tried, but it turned out, but remember the agreements of the russian empire, which established the border between russia and china for a century, which means, if we want, we can, therefore, we need to get rid of this eurocentrism imposed and say we are a middle state. we

have europe and asia, we can negotiate normally with everyone, if we are treated with respect, here is the one who treats us with whom we started who treats iran turkey china yes these let them wait until they suffer all the hardships from those sanctions from those barriers that they administer against us, therefore while cold detachment and certainly not be led by these antics that here we respect russian, conservative culture there. they will first try to deceive, and only then will they negotiate when they see the strength and power that is worth it. behind us here we put an end to this grateful, respected guests for the discussion, what is the fact that all past systems of international relations gave rise to global conflicts, and now the existence of nuclear weapons makes us believe in the possibility of a different path and hope that diplomats can build a new building. until the wreckage of the old is buried at all.

well, now sas is authorized to declare. a multipolar world would be otherwise, the alternative to it would be a nuclear war every week we are laying new routes through interesting corners of belarus today i will debunk myths and open for you, zhidvichi and the surrounding area. captain let's get acquainted with interesting people, and in many ways they have succeeded . indeed, they often call our palace, and the belarusian versailles. it's really very important palace. one of the largest one of the most magnificent palaces, showing local traditions

and iconic sights, the territory of the modern national park was inhabited 1.000 years ago, all this is a modern interpretation of the language yet, but once there were many such places. watch in the program the route was built on belarus 24 tv channel. in times of rapid change, it is important for us to show you. the main thing is that the country has fixed a clear position that it adheres to. today we keep history, appreciate the achievements of generations and honor traditions global perspectives, high diplomacy and social studies. however, the fact remains that dialogue platforms have started working. and these are the chances for everyone to be heard, we will draw detailed conclusions, see exclusive interviews and talk about the main events on the main air. watch on tv channel belarus 24.

we are going on a grandiose trip around belarus for sure. many have heard that the geographical center of belarus is located in this region . but not everyone knows that this is the only region. whose name does not match the name of the district center and 1067, the date of the first mention of the city in the tale of bygone years, professional guides and local historians, the working floor was lifted up by a winch, bags of grain were passed on to this beam. here are such huge tongs, author's routes and interesting places.

with us to belarus 24 us as a result, the weight of the loaf will be 10 million 600 thousand tons. these are grain legumes corn and cruciferous. this is a very good result, were the forecasts justified or actually? yes, it must be said that this is a record harvest we got for modern history. that's why we managed to get it. and this year, on what crops did we make promotions. well, you know, we practically increased. we all sowed more potatoes , sugar beet, flax vegetables, uh, winter barley, almost doubled, in principle, everything here was justified for us. we have harvested potatoes, we have harvested more vegetables, we have harvested more and more. well,

300 have been prepared and practically completed in all respects. uh, topped last year. we, if we increase almost everything, that is, we have rose passive area in the country. you know that we will increase the area under crops, but this is the minimum amount. to say that in the republic are added a large number at the same time here. er, of course, technology, first of all this year. we had a very favorable country and the president's government very seriously lent a shoulder to all of us agrarians. uh, in providing, above all, fuel. we took the repair of our equipment very seriously, we did it all and, of course, the availability of mineral fertilizers is very high, so the return happened. and as for his attraction of additional lands of the whole turnover. you must have seen the latter. uh, a meeting with the participation of the head of state, on the police. so, i want to say that we have about 400.000 hectares of earth