something appeals, they will all be provided, plus it must be said that a fairly large number, but they use the measures that have been taken to get family capital ahead of schedule for improving housing conditions, too, all of these. uh, it means that families receive these resources, so there will only be a plus here. in addition, the draft law on the budget of the social security fund was adopted in two readings; the income of the funds for the next year is planned at a level of more than 25 billion rubles. 18.8 billion rubles will be allocated for the payment of pensions. this is more than this year will increase and the amount of funds allocated for the payment of benefits. also today, the deputies adopted in the first reading. the bill on taxation provides for systemic changes in relation to approaches to taxation of self-employed citizens, as well as individual entrepreneurs, the seventh meeting of the advisory council on belarusian affairs was held at the ministry of foreign affairs, and representatives of the diaspora came to the event. foreign and near abroad jordan

spain usa germany uzbekistan estonia deputy minister of foreign affairs igor nazaruk informed the participants about the ongoing events in belarus and outside the country. we provide, firstly, the uh communication of our people who, for one reason or another, found themselves outside the motherland on the other side. we will ensure the continuity of the generation, where we pass on our traditions, our knowledge, our cultural and other values ​​that we possess, and we constantly share with our compatriots the latest information, the latest lights about the events that are taking place directly in the country for so that they have there was a clear e and at the same time objective. e, the picture

is a representation of reality, and not about how it is sometimes reported in individual countries or a group of countries . uh. naturally, with certain propaganda goals at the seventh meeting of the advisory council on belarusian affairs, they summed up the joint work and discussed prospects for the future. a modern transport and logistics center will be built in the vitebsk region on the spot a capsule with a message was laid, the terminal will provide all types of transport and logistics services, including a site for cargo vehicles warehouses, including a customs warehouse, a modern site is located in close proximity to the airport, vitebsk is near the railway junction - this opens up opportunities for the development of multimodal transportation, despite eu sanctions, the presence of a logistics infrastructure allows us to ensure both the export of our enterprises, and

the receipt of raw materials, components for our factories. part of our business refocused on logistics through the territory of the russian federation and after it is built. e, there will be a full range of logistics operations here e, there are a dozen similar logistics complexes operating in belarus and the most promising technologies timber has become more accessible to the population, representatives of the ministry of forestry of belarus stated this woodworking materials from primary sawmilling, necessary for the construction of housing on backyard buildings and their repair earlier, the government was instructed to stimulate the development of domestic consumption of wood and products from it, including among the population. today, three similar sites are already operating in minsk dzerzhinsky mozyr assortment. they reach up to five thousandth of the

name from march 2023, five more such points in all regions will start working. on saturday, december 10, the state philharmonic hall hammered a chamber dedication to vladimir vysotsky for the symphonic presentation of the works of bardo, the orchestra of the choir took over, sonorus arrangement well-known melodies will sound differently promise premieres in the scores poems in the reading of cinema theater actor artur fedorovich his timbre and appearance are recognized as similar to vysotsky himself in his performance horses fastidious sail and hunting for wolves will not bypass songs that have become popular through skins on the screen thanks to the people's artist ussr viktor turov, some even say that it is blasphemous to sing his songs. well, i don’t think so, after all, he wrote for people of his work in a very diverse way on completely different topics. naturally in one concert. all this cannot enter, therefore, i will show a small bag even to smoke vladimir semyonovich, they will be relevant in 100

years. and even more so, since he beat them. what is his return? all this was brought by such people. even more than once 100 years are born much less frequently in the perimeter of the large hall of whites. lord of harmony there will be no staged play focusing on music and words. what belarusian cell scientists do is the cells of multicellular organisms that live, multiply in artificial conditions, culture cells can be obtained from almost any organ or tissue. the defect in the treatment of iron deficiency depends primarily on the daily dose of iron that is consumed per day and the duration of therapy, which is currently being worked on in laboratories, the country's leading scientific institutions in this regard. we are also developing the direction of developing new generation vaccines, this is a recombinant vaccine, a vector

vaccine, watch the popular science project science mania on our tv channel. most of the songs of this belarusian composer became folk slides summer one day, i wrote. four songs, and i like everything one more than the other less, but i especially love olesya for sihidar. arkady kuleshov behind each melody is a special search for finds, inspiration and experiences. and i was told at school on freedom square who wants to be a composer. god gave me a tune from mom and dad. it's their fault

that this is the melody. and when there is already a melody, then it appears what twists and turns were in the fate of a talented composer. what is the secret of his success, and what was behind the scenes of his life? igor splinter

i'm the host nadezhda sas i greet you, let me remind you. this is a program for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of each of the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. we will tell you right now. the head of the european commission, ursula von der leyen, has suddenly made a big hole in ukrainian official propaganda. just by naming the figure of 100,000 when describing the losses of the armed forces of ukraine, a german. i wanted to emphasize horror

russian invasion, but did not take into account the fact that the zelensky regime carefully hides losses at the front from its own citizens. fearing the truth to undermine their faith in victory, fonderlein’s revelation caused such indignation of the kiva that a fragment of the speech of the head of the european commission was even cut out of a file posted on her twitter page, and the press secretary of the european commission began to prove that we are talking about the total number of dead and wounded all. this only increased interest in the topic and helped to crackdown, resolving an important myth of the news. moreover, in ukraine has long been dissatisfied with the concealment by the authorities of the scale of losses among military personnel. in china, the most massive protests in the last 30 years are taking place, the reason for student unrest was dissatisfaction with the authorities' strict quarantine measures, forcing hundreds of thousands of people to stay in isolation for weeks and months,

for cases of coronavirus detected in one or another group. the so-called zero-tolerance policy for covid, when the broad masses are simply not allowed to get sick with the virus. and by this in combination with vaccination to obtain herd immunity has long been criticized by specialists. in addition, it leads to significant losses for the national economy. yes, and ordinary chinese in their mass are less afraid of infection. than having to live in near-permanent quarantine, though there are no signs yet that the protests will force the authorities. china to change the approach of the event. in china, belarusian observers were allowed to note that the strategy of combating the pandemic chosen by the leadership of our country turned out to be more. adapted to the implementation of medical measures without creating excessive additional difficulties for the economy and society this week in minsk , the ministers

of foreign affairs said goodbye to vladimir makeyev. on november 26, a civil memorial service was held in the house of officers. one of the first to come there was the president of belarus. also from representatives of authorities, public and political figures from abroad throughout his career, vladimir makei was a true patriot of belarus, he developed the best traditions of belarusian diplomacy and did everything to strengthen the authority of our country in the international arena. yes, i want to note that vladimir vladimirovich makei was a supporter of a multi-vector approach, which contributed to the successful development of the state of successful

foreign policy activities of the republic of belarus. but today we will talk a little about another about the future of the world system. on the future of the world order, i want to note that the english historian alan taylor once wrote and although formally the meaning of achieving the status of a great power is to acquire the ability to fight in a big war. only by avoiding such a war can one remain a great power for a long time and the wisdom of a great sign such a history of diplomacy indicates that despite the bellicose rhetoric, all the leading powers of the world strive to build a system of relations that will prevent a world war. and what will it be system and how many pluses i think we will talk about today's program. i am glad to welcome alexey dzermond, who is already present in our studio. political scientist good evening and viktor nikolaevich

litovkin military observer taz political scientist of the russian federation hello good evening and first of all we start our program with millet blitz, superpower. still alone or no longer alone? what do you think alexey in my opinion, it is definitely not the only one. although, she heads a very serious western bloc and, together with allies in asia, uh, and this bloc is trying to maintain its hegemony, but this is no longer working, neither in the economy nor in the military-political sphere, so this is most likely. a declining hegemon against the background of the fact that new superpowers have emerged and are growing, that is, we are at the moment of transition from a unipolar model to a multipolar one , or in any case more diverse. yes, but

viktor nikolaevich, please, or what to call a superpower? this is very important, yes felicia, whether it is firm, she is an economic power, either militarily or politically . well, in general, others in the development of a person, freedom of a person, freedom of speech, and so on and so forth, so here you can say differently, but of course, one of the superpowers is generally accepted. this is the united states but if china , which is in no way inferior in economic terms, the united states, in terms of per capita income, even surpasses it. the united states latest data yes, a diplomat with a ph.d. in political science joins our airwaves. well i am i think you are following our conversation, which has just begun, i suggest you answer the superpower blitz question. still alone or no longer alone

, and in general, what criteria are necessary to meet the status of a superpower, in your opinion. i greet the distinguished participants in the discussion and the audience of your program. eh, i think that, nevertheless, according to the criterion, let's say, so key in my understanding for a great power. it's the possession of a power that, er, is greater than all the other great steps combined. eh, probably even the united states today is not impossible to call a full-fledged superpower. that is, they are one and only and cash is really without being near the bloc of the state, which they rely on themselves cannot resist. let's say. this is an incredible situation, of course, in which everyone united against the united states about this. but if this happened, the united states themselves would not cope with this, therefore, by and large, if you approach it very strictly, then probably there is not a single superpower in the world today . though of course, of course, the united states deserves this status. much closer than any other

country in the world. it's easy, look, viktor nikolaevich correctly noted. let's still define our definition, please, colleagues. on the screen what is a superpower, so that everything becomes clear and understandable to our viewers, a superpower is an independent state with huge cultural, political, economic and military potentials, including a superpowerful nuclear potential, a superpower has superiority over most other states, which allow it to exercise hegemony not only in its region, but also in the most remote parts of the planet. by what criteria do you think it should be ranked. this is a power, because, if you look at purely economic indicators, germany also seems to be a more powerful player on the world stage than even the russian federation, although in practice we understand that this is absolutely not the case. and if we are talking about a specific leader, yes, here is today's germany of mr. schulz, but it looks

absolutely spineless state. well, in my opinion. here in this definition is. uh, the key thing is a super-powerful nuclear potential. in my opinion, after all, a superpower must have this criterion. that is, if the state has such a potential that it can destroy the enemy or even the entire planet. this is already a sign, at least for superpowers. this means that you are already included in the strategy game around the future is integral. not just nuclear weapons, for example, north korea, but they also have or israel but here is the ability to destroy the enemy, the united states for example, or even the entire planet. this is a sign that they will talk to you differently. all the rest, it means that you are recognized by certain superstatus, which is not available even to some other nuclear

states. viktor nikolaevich what do you think, without nuclear weapons in the modern world, the state can not defend their? certainly so, but kim jong-un has nuclear weapons. and no matter how many sanctions were announced to him. no matter how much they present to him any claims, no matter how they press him, no one touches his state. here, adam hussein and gaddafi did not have cores on their weapons. we know what happened to them. but e donald trump drove three attack aircraft carrier formations on each aircraft carrier, 90 aircraft, to the waters of north korea. he promised to turn north korea into a radioactive field. and that he quickly got out of there, because he was afraid of an attack on american military bases in south korea, and here one more key word is important in my opinion independent state. well,

france has nuclear weapons. uh, the uk is they independent states? i would question this question why. because both countries are members of nato, and any country that is a member of nato, it signs that it allocates part of its sovereignty of its independence to nato headquarters and, in fact, to washington, so today is not uh biden travels to paris to agree on how to conduct nato policy, and macron travels to washington and tries to negotiate with biden and washington on how to live on. let's pay attention to the map, which marked the potential superpowers, please, alexey in your opinion. european union. we can call it this unification of the state, as there is no superpower. at the moment, the first questions is this is the power of the state. and this is a

hybrid between an international organization and some kind of bloc with signs of a federal structure, but we also understand that in the political and in military-political terms, as the european union and even the most independent sovereign states, allegedly its states, have already said here. such as france, they are subordinate anyway, uh, or brussels, but in the form of the eu and nato or washington, that is, the european union. in my opinion, he does not have a sufficient degree of sovereignty and sovereignty in order to make decisions in his own interests. that is why he is now suffering in many respects from those sanctions, uh, which are introduced, let's say, higher-ranking ones. players. yes, but with this, remember the legendary question. eh, gentleman from stalin how many divisions does the pope have and at the same time the real influence of the vatican on world diplomacy is very significant oleg here is a

question for you. here is a rather interesting question, if the united states of america after 1945 was still the strongest country in the world. why is washington working so hard on the creation and development of various alliances, although the same donald trump, the forty-fifth president of the united states, it was believed that america should play in alone. yes. uh, the main task is to make america strong again, and in fact, in terms of the number of allies, the united states, of course, no one can compare, and even tandem in russia, china, and yet a little from the other. well, actually, the united states, when they need it, and act, in general, alone. uh, without much regard for their even formal most important allies. we can recall the war in iraq in 2003, which was also very openly and consistently opposed by france and germany . that did not stop, for example, in the family states to undertake an invasion of iraq, ignoring the opinion of the allies and many other similar situations. not

only under trump, under other presidents. now a large-scale scandal is unfolding between the european union and the united states over the infinition reduction ac, that is, the inflation reduction legislation adopted in the united states, which provides for a number of subsidies for american industry, which can very seriously undermine the position of european industry, and this is absolutely not allied behavior, but still less the united states in this does not look back. why do they rely on unions two things, first, it is clear obvious. and the simplest answer is that, of course. they simply thereby shift part of the time, and the economic losses of human costs and expenses for the same military operations and so on to other countries, but, more importantly, something else. uh, the united states is unlike any other country. today, claiming status. e great power, especially since it has a potential superpower a certain ideology, it does not claim to be universalism. that is, to promote your

set of values ​​on your geological agenda to the whole world in this situation. naturally, there is the creation of a circle of countries that demonstrate their commitment to this particular geological platform in this key situation with the union after all, when we say the same west, they call themselves that. these are certain conspiracies there. naturally, not everything is so simple, but forgive everything. this is a certain set of values ​​and not so important, for example, what specific formal relations are associated, for example, with the united states, japan or australia or new zealand, everything is perfect? it is clear what is there on the key issues in relation to the future of humanity? to the rules of conduct and so on, the united states for example in new zealand the united states and italy the united states and poland are on one side of the barrier, for example the united states and china the united states or the republic of belarus as a whole are on the other side barrier viktor nikolaevich and how can you characterize the role of medium-sized states such as saudi arabia, iran turkey in the future of

the world system. i think that these states are shaping their true independence and sovereignty today, they are developing, and the development of economic states, military development, it allows, uh, to raise their voice for the protection of their national interests. here you are the same turkey. pay attention to how turkey confronts the united states when the turks bought our s-400 complex. yes, anti-aircraft complex. i am for for i say to our listeners. what kind of pressure was exerted it pay attention. greece had an s-300 complex. yes, it is also a member of nato and there were no problems there. but turkey bought the s400 , which means problems, because they are connected to the nato system, uh, about the common one, and so on, they brought turkey to turkey, despite the continued blackmail. yes, to the attempted coup d'état in turkey and much

more of what is happening in turkey so far and turkey , uh, persistently pursues its national policy , the same in saudi arabia, you remember that saudi arabia has always been the gas station of the united states and today saudi arabia refuses, uh, the president with the president 's attendant baida, to increase the production of netty, yes, and proudly. e even does not shake hands with this president, he also defends his interests. well, and so are other states that today, on the one hand, are weakening the united states, the hemogenesis of the united states is weakening and n- and against this background, their independence, their character , their own, as it were, the ability to withstand pressure these are the states that you called oleg, please give you the word the international system, first of all, is how relations are built between the great powers, that is, its key nodes, and the rest of the states. e can influence or influence,

of course, in one way or another on these connections. but uh, if we remember, why is the system called, for example, bipolar yes, that, apart from the soviet union and the united states, there were no other states there, dozens were quite powerful, like in the same china, india there to some extent, there is yugoslavia and etc. but bipolar, because there were two superpowers was the european concert. well, how about that, there are five key great powers interacting with each other, therefore, of course, uh, medium-sized states and even small ones that have, say, strong-willed leaders there and know their weak strengths, having them play in time for contradiction. great lies can but influence the development of the international system. but, otherwise what the system will become as a whole really depends on the nodes, so we will look at the same turkey erdogan. he offers everything or to turkey by the time, er, when the new international system settles down. and it will probably take 5-10 years there, but it has reached the level. well, let’s say,

if it didn’t reach, for example, the influence of the same russia and india there, but somewhere it approached, uh, according to a number of indicators, that is, just count on the fact that turkey can be, for example, or iran a second-rate state, but it will be reckoned with by those who create the nodes of the system. this is naive, therefore, and the key will be who sits down for this big table. here, relatively speaking, there is a new one, yalta. yes, if any of them takes place there, let the president of russia be there, let's say the leader of the prc, uh, the leader is more or less. well, there, if something like that, that's dramatic, doesn't happen, these three representatives will 100% be like whatever their names are. yes. and who else is fighting for this now, and the same active position of turkey, too, the vigorous activity of iran is aimed at trying as much as possible up to an attempt to create a grain weapon, as in the case of iran, i don’t i exclude. turkey will follow this path, but jumping to this level in order to be at the same table almost on an equal footing, well, relatively on an equal footing with

russia , china and the united states belarus, here is how a state like belarus today builds its foreign policy and how to behave correctly in order to remain always strong during this period of transformation and to be considered with you, firstly, you need to correctly assess the current moment in which we are unfortunately, the estimates are extremely alarming. in fact, we are on the front flank of this struggle, it is important, first of all, to defend the security of the country, so that our opponents in the west do not have the slightest doubt that any of their attacks, diversionary provocations, will meet the harshest response. this is, in principle, the first condition for them to understand that war is

inevitable in this case, a large-scale war. uh, this is where all negotiations begin, as soon as the enemy understands that you are strong, then you will not be attack and try to negotiate further. if we agree, we must show that we are not just there isolated by someone. yes, we have our blog our allies. this is the immediate environment of the post-soviet, let's say the space, therefore, we will have to work as allies in order to exploit a certain union into a more disciplined one. and plus the allies of the far arc, well, first of all. china , iran, possibly, india. here in this configuration, when we stand we will show our strength in the form of a bloc, uh, with the closest allies and a little bit of allies away on these terms. we can agree. and we will naturally have our own voice and position in this configuration. i am sure of this. by the way, the president of the republic of

belarus alexander lukashenko expressed his intentions at the collapse of the unipolar world, let's listen, the world will no longer be the same in the united states is no longer a monopoly on decision-making for other countries and continents, the unipolar order is collapsing and new centers of power are emerging. this and china this and india this and russia the countries of the middle east latin america the world is waking up. that's why i'm trying hold control from the us world policeman is turning into the world terrorist. so you know, i want to and it is important to note that formally alliances are currently fading into the background and now is the time for states with their own course with their own vision and the time for bright leaders. and here, notice. we remembered, not in vain, mr. scholz, or else we will take it. yes, here is a state that is larger in territory in terms of military potential than

the republic of belarus, but there is no bright leader, an indistinct foreign policy, and therefore with an opinion no one considers the state. i share your opinion about the leader, of course, the state must be a bright leader, that's for sure. this is a man who should lead the nation to determine the tasks of the goal of this nation and by his personal example he will unite the nations, but i do not quite agree with you about the fact that the alliance is giving way to a place on the world stage today, depending on which alliances, if it's like nato where subordinate to the united states and play by the rules set by the united states until such nobody needs an alliance, because it is the united states is the exploiter of this alliance. yes, but the alliance is such as brix, where all equal states and they united in order to cooperate together, e,

respect each other on equal terms, take into account national interests , and so on and so forth. i think that such unions should be increased, there should be more of them, but certainly there should be national leaders who will defend the national interests of this or that state. here's about european union, indeed. let's pay attention, after all. uh, now there are no leaders in europe who are able to defend national interests. and this is no coincidence. it is the united states that is raising these people. all of them have been trained in the united states. the united states has done. eh, as if the filters are such that e to power, no one can come. yes, there is lipen in france, yes, a wonderful woman who puts forward national interests, where she elects some kind of macron, it is not known where it came from. yes, an assistant is worth it. i don't want to offend my husband and my teacher.

yes, but is this the leader of france a man who, and so on and so forth. well, i'm sorry for france. give me please, in your opinion, if you say the united kingdom could take a certain place in the multipolar world, if the concept of global britain has a chance to come true, or if we are talking about the need to have a bright leader in in this case, it is not available in the uk. or maybe you don't agree with me? you are absolutely right. by the way this is an interesting example of the versatility, uh of the political process, there really are uh, nations are cultures political cultures of tradition, where really uh, the absence of a strong leader leads to the formation of inevitable chaos of decay and so on and vice versa,

uh and structures are built differently where very strong consolidated stabilization, which has its own environment. in general, it can single out a strong leader, it may not. uh, there are not so many such politicians, let's say political associations, but even the uk is a prime example, and there are few countries where we can see the kind of political whispering that happens regularly in the united kingdom. even this year we observed, but simply phantasmagorically, and circus stories connected there with crises with a course 40 days after coming on after, in fact, as some joke. she just became the prime minister with dignity to see off the last journey of the english queen elizabeth there and so on. this is the only thing she will remember, but no one will deny that, for example, in the same conflict in ukraine in many other stories of great britain plays a very, very significant role. it has a colossal intelligence apparatus much more competent than many other intelligence agencies, often

than the american society is divorced, and it has the status of one of the financial centers of the world. sometimes there is an impression that this could be saxon, but this is not a tandem and there are five fi-fays so-called there in the main five countries, yes, besides the united states of great britain, let me remind you, canada australia e. new zealand and what exactly is he there, and not washington, is in the lead in this five saxon countries, that is, in the absence of a leader, and sometimes with such enough. well, let's say, the leaders, under which any state space in the psv collapsed long ago, great britain manages to remain a key poppy. this speaks to the strength of the british political class. a small tradition and that there really are some societies in which the presence of a strong leader would even be harmful to this society. the same, by the way, partly applies to united states of america and we remember the features of mr. trump and the current president, to be honest, too. well, far from theodore roosevelt,

you know, and the frankente, not frank, was on the russian line of eduardo roosevelt and not wilson, a few others not reagan and a few other great leaders of this state, but nevertheless, no one cancels the fact that the united states, due to the fact that again, here is the structure, why do i say the structure, they occupy such a place for the first time, for example, the financial system, that you can go there you know, there e comedian from the talk show to put the head of this country, and the result will be fucking comedian from the talk show oleg really. i would like to talk now about the differences between the present moment and the bipolar system, and i would like to proci. the second world war left only two states america and the ussr in a state of political ideological and military dynamism, making them able to fill the resulting power vacuum

no cold war emerged, but a bipolar system of international relations. more details in our story. the second world war completely destroyed the multipolar model of the world. previously leading powers such as great britain germany italy france japan were either defeated and occupied or seriously weakened the world became bipolar a new system of international relations was headed by the former military allies of the ussr and the usa it was the nature of their relationship that began to determine the course of international development . in general, since the dialogue between two nuclear superpowers. the physical survival of all mankind depended, and nuclear weapons themselves became the most important structural component of the future cold war between the soviet union and the united states. a confrontation unfolded under irreconcilable ideological slogans, the two superpowers began to divide the world, while actively interfering in the affairs of third countries and

trying to win them over to their side by any means, however, not being able to fight each other. cool, united states and soviet the union was resisted with the help of satellite countries, everything was used from financial assistance to direct military support, the conflict escalated after the united states deployed medium-range missiles in turkey, the distance was enough for them to fly to moscow, a number of other large cities of the soviet union, in response to this, the ussr placed in its missile in cuba however, a nuclear war was avoided, and the final stage of the cold war was the total collapse of communist regimes in many countries of the world, the end of the cold war led to colossal shifts in the balance of power on the world stage and to the end of the bipolar system of international relations. you know, our brain is so arranged that it is easier for us to perceive certain things through analogies. and now, for example, the

confrontation between moscow and washington began today, they immediately started talking about a new cold war, but in fact the situation is cardinal, at least there is no clear ideological confrontation in the way russia today is groping for a conservative ideology, as a counterbalance hmm to the globalist post humanism, although there are quite a lot of conservatives among the republicans. and yet a. what is the main difference you see between the state of affairs today and the cold war period? well, first i will argue a little with yours in the absence of an ideological factor. that is, he is absent. uh, as if the only ideology of communism left the russian side, yes, but russian society or russian civilization. it is also based on certain deep-seated values, which remained even when they were combined with communism. this turned out to be the soviet system, and

then it looked like this. these are ideologies. now, for example, there is no mandatory communism. but there are some things they are in the form of conservatism, or they can be in the form of purely geopolitical logic. yes, but all the same, these are the things that determine western relations. the elites have not gone away to russia, so i would not flatter myself with the illusion that the ideology has gone. she just took on a new form. well, what is the difference and what to make the list situation much more dangerous after all, when yes , there are two players of a major superpower between them here is the tension of the conflict caribbean crisis. they then agree on certain rules, then the process of agreement is launched to reduce and contain the arms race there. they develop some kind of rules of interaction warning from each other about the danger. and now look at this whole system of practically agreements, no one has collapsed. and this, well, let 's say a direct dialogue. he is, of course, there are special services. all this is there just in case, it is

preserved, but now the security architecture has collapsed and instead of it there is nothing new came. and this means even more vulnerability has appeared and some incidents may arise. and how to work with them, if you need to find out, here comes a submarine with nuclear weapons, this is a danger to russia or the united states . but there can be many such moments, and therefore the situation is much more dangerous than in the first cold war. viktor nikolayevich well, you are, first of all, a military observer. tell me, please, that the reorganization of the world always took place on the basis of global wars. is it really in this time it's inevitable, well a global war. i think it's being pushed back because while russia has just as much nuclear missiles as the united states, but note here's a treaty on cancer reduction and limitations on strategic offensive arms.

only we have the latest treaty between russia and the united states, and in the united states it is an agreement based on equal forces. yes, the united states was forced to conclude this treaty, the united states was forced to extend this contract. although trump did not want to renew it and vot tried to blackmail us, but biden just came to the white house, and he was immediately one of the first decrees that he signed this agreement to extend it for five years, that is. united states well , the word afraid is probably wrong, but they respect our nuclear missile potential, and nevertheless, the united states is trying to destroy our country with other third parties, therefore, i think that this is a global war. she, of course, is on the doorstep. she threatens us that it will happen. i hope it won't happen in my lifetime. i would also like to draw

attention to our plasma to draw a map of the spheres of influence of the soviet union of the united states of america at the final stage, and during the cold war, the yellow colored states that were allies of the soviet union, the green united states of america, alexey, i read an important difference between the current line of moscow and the position of the soviet union precisely in the fact that today's russia is in no hurry to finance allies around the world there are a number of states relatives who receive some financial assistance, but still it is impossible to compare with the billions that the soviet union invested in africa alone, or even some of its citizens suffered from this at that moment. in this sense, a new confrontation between the

great powers. here, in your opinion, does not mean certain assistance for third world countries well, because as we say superpowers, this is a state that can see influence other states and influence can be different and ideological and financial. well, here's the question. uh, let's say in ambition, as far as i can see, while russia does not show global ambitions. she would like to have a security sphere in eurasia but, well, perhaps some kind of relationship with allies on other continents, but first of all , it is about russia's own security and the immediate environment. uh, therefore, it naturally makes sense to invest in far abroad countries to set especially friendly regimes there. no for today . this is for now. well, russia can change a little bit of your strategy. if y wins . if, let's say, a slightly different alignment begins, but for now, uh, and we still live here the question is for the

sake of which certain countries of the americans are supported, they still invest money in a friendly regime in order to, well, keep global hegemony or restrain someone i.e. around the perimeter. russia is putting friendly regimes in russia , money is being pumped in there so that they hold back the opponents of russia, respectively. or china, let's say for the time being, no one has such a task, even the chinese if latin america is invested in africa first of all, well, actually the economic benefit is development for the sake of this, and they, of course, receive from there, that is, control over resources. now the logic has changed a bit. well, relatively speaking, the predators grappled with each other. that's who will come up with the logic after this struggle. that is, how can we, together on the planet, agree between the poles, which will already determine their strength and the limit of the enemy's influence on them will be seen. then maybe the situation is a bit different. come, that same multipolar world. but until

we test the limits of each other's strength, this will not come, and the last question for you is about ideology, about the ideological component of the politics of different states today. really. and every state that claims to be a superpower is trying to form. ideological content, but tell me, if we are talking about a future multipolar world, how different ideologies are possible, how they can be narrowed, because if we take, but the liberal agenda, which is now all the same takes over, uh, in the lives of american citizens. and, of course, uh, say the skeletons dream that this agenda of this ideology will take over the whole world. a very short remark on the previous part and taste. if so, if you will allow me, and about uh, unlike the cold war, the fact is

that in the united states today, too , finances are not particularly helping anyone, a key instrument of influencing the elites of different countries. they have it today mr. punishment mechanism through a very well-designed, uh, thoughtful uh honed, so go ahead, the so-called fight against uh, international terrorism sanctions today. states can control almost any deal. e, passing conducted in dollars to euros or other currencies of the transaction, the west and e, let's say. here is a very simple example. yes, too, for example, serbia yes , despite the fact that there is total support here, let's say sympathy it is clear to russia there historically closer to china and so on, nevertheless, the leadership is pursuing a multi-vector balanced policy. just realize that otherwise they fall under the most severe skating rink of financial punishment. and this is exactly what the united states controls so many elites today, including in individual countries after the soviet space and even in russia, influencing those who have yacht houses and so on, because

this is the mechanism by which in the united states can do more today than if they just gave money to somebody, they don't even have to give money. they just know where who is. i'm sorry i stole it and can it be stolen or let them use or be removed. this is the key tool by which the united states uh, today uh, governs the elite in many countries. they have corruption, they do not fight corruption, they manage corruption. this is an important element in understanding what to apologize for today is largely american influence and ideology. very briefly, i will try to say, yes indeed. eh, today. uh, there is a chance that, and russia will formulate a number of other countries, but this, by the way, is interesting, not in opposition to the west, and as part of the struggle for another west well, because , roughly speaking, we are still part of me, at least that’s how i perceive myself, many people my views are part of this big historical christian there are christian people, if you want civilizations that are based, let’s say on the bible there on other sacred texts and with a certain

set of values. in any case, for us, the same china, which in some ways can be close and understandable, but in general as a civilization. it 's completely different. we can't. well i don't i imagine that for me, for example, the chinese were concepts than the germans, for example, yes, so, if we can, and along with those constructive conservative christian forces. which exist today both in the usa and in europe, but let's say, rebuild our relations and build these bridges from this, and russia in this sense can play both russia and belarus, let's say, and even ukraine in the future, how all the same i am basically christian, traditionalist society, but can play your role, then it is really possible to qualitatively change and here the so-called west it is this, by the way, in fact, the globalist cast are afraid. why were they screaming so loudly all the time? stop trump. and putin although there is no connection between them. in fact, there weren’t any collusions, in fact, there weren’t, but from the point of view, for example, the attitude towards lgbt uh, family values, and so

on trump viktor orban in hungary alexander lukashenko in belarus uh director tagan in turkey on the one hand, a macron. uh, biden, there and other proponents of this new lgbt ethic new transgender people. and other things they are on the other hand, that's all, that is, in fact, uh, re- russia and the west are not doomed to confrontation , conservative societies are doomed to confrontation of traditionalists, and so the globalist who is in the west today. yes, thank you, oleg voloshin, a diplomat, was in touch with us. the program is authorized to announce whether a global concert of great powers is possible and let's remember that the names of such prominent diplomats as prince toleyran, russian foreign minister alexander gorchakov, chancellor. otto

von bismarck lit all these stars the era of the balance of power and the concert of europe then diplomats were required to know many languages, to know history, to be able to beautifully express their thoughts, to find arguments and finally think, because everything was decided behind closed doors and in a dispute of equals now look at the head of the german foreign ministry she says with slogans that under the camera, that without sms-terrible, that it is fun for the broad masses, diplomacy has turned into a show where everything is for show, but now i would like to remind our viewers. what is represented the european concert. the concert of europe is a system of international relations that was formed by the consent of the great european powers in the period from 1814 to 1914 after the revolutionary and napoleonic wars, it gave europe the

longest period in history without major wars. , powers against any claimant to sole behemonia, disputes were resolved through large-scale diplomatic congresses, where priority was given to multi-level, bargaining and behind-the-scenes agreements , the system ensured the flourishing of diplomatic art and the colonial division of the world by european powers. you know today in the mode of the frontal place of the project house-2. it is impossible to solve global issues, and that's why if a power wants to prevent a world war, a big war, somehow further interact, they still need to return to classical diplomacy behind closed doors viktor nikolayevich what do you think? is a global concert of the great powers possible? i strongly doubt everything, because no one has canceled competition and it is impossible to cancel it. competition is the source of the development of the dialectical development of all states. therefore,

yes, the diplomacy of the european concert was, uh, based on the greatness of the economic and economic dependencies of states. russia was a great, grain power, not to mention the fact that it was a great military power and europe was forced to reckon with it. this bread is how today we know the story of how you bring bread from odessa. yes he ukrainian bread russian bread is brought out of novorossiysk, it turns out that there is again a great need for our bread. yes, and therefore some indulgences are being made for us for our country, but it was the same in russia. russia was. after she defeated napoleon and everyone had to reckon with russia, we say there were no big wars. yes, there were big wars, the russian-turkish war. remember the liberation of bulgaria. and remember, as alexander iii said without my permission, not a single gun fires in europe. it was e

reckoned with russia had to be reckoned with, but there were astrologers, hungary was there was an alliance between germany and france, there were all the time conflicts. yes , there were english colonies, which, in india, everything happened there. uh, the rebellion were the suppression of these. revolts also in indocia france and so on. each country had sources of economic power at that time then at that moment, yes, therefore they were forced to reckon with each other, but today there is the united states and there is the european union, with which the united states does not are considered because the european union has already been forced to act under uh at the request of the united states operation you. pay attention to a small detail, the united states forced the european union to impose sanctions on us. the european

union is losing a lot of money. on these sanctions. at the same time, the united states continues to talk sanctions to continue trading with us. they buy our wounds from 15 to 40% of american nuclear power plants operated by russian earlier. they buy our oil. they buy ours. uh, titan we just make titanium for boeings, components on the territory of russia and titanium did not fall under any sanctions. i will tell you more about the first voyages of our gas carrier with liquefied gas. christov de margirie from sabet you know where he went on the northern sea route in the united states the very first voyage went to the united states we took hmm 350,000 cubic meters there. e liquefied gas, so the united states is exploiting europe for its own interests both military and

economic. well, really after the second world war. this whole european concert turned its back on the soviet union. unfortunately, but today it’s true that the european union, as an association of states, how the union has lost its power and is gradually turning into the back of the united states of america . multipolarity be? of course, to be, but for this i would have a little inner feeling, and in russia we have me here, i would argue with a colleague who spoke on the link. he says we european, christian country, but after all, russia is not only a european, but also an asian country and not only a christian, but also a muslim country, therefore, for a balanced sense of self, you need to feel like a eurasian country. yes, yes, there is a european one, no one refuses it, but these hopes that the conservatives will come to

power there, and we will agree with them again, this is an illusion. even if they come, well, trump was 5 years old, and that he was poking and poking around, he couldn’t agree, but lipen. she votes all the votes west national front french adopts anti-russian resolutions and according to historical memory, and now, therefore, he hopes for the right-wing conservatives of the traditional. this is an illusion, they do not need us as a strong subject, therefore, they need an internal one. how to develop nastya not only focused on europe and the west, but also on asia, they say, we will never understand each other with the chinese, and you tried, but it turned out, but remember the agreements of the russian empire, which established the border between russia and china for a century, which means if we want we can, so here we need to get rid of this imposed eurocentrism and say we are a middle state. we have europe and asia, we can negotiate normally with everyone, if we are treated with respect by the one who treats us with whom we started

treating iran turkey china yes, let them wait until they suffer all the hardships from those sanctions from those barriers that they they are introducing against us, therefore, for now, cold detachment and certainly not be led by these antics that here we respect russian, conservative culture there. they first they will try to deceive, but only then they will come to an agreement when they see the strength and power that is behind us. here we put an end to this. i am grateful, respected guests for the discussion, well, the fact is that all past systems of international relations were born of the fire of global conflicts, and now the existence of nuclear weapons makes us believe in the possibility of a different path and hope that diplomats will be able to build a new building. until the wreckage of the old is buried at all. well, now sas is authorized to declare. multipolar world to be

otherwise the alternative would be nuclear war

. are you watching the panorama live with you tatyana korol? good evening. let's sum up the results of this day together, the president will fly to bishkek tomorrow . alexander lukashenko will take part in a meeting of the supreme eurasian economy.