gambi of belarus today will debunk myths and discover for you, zhidvichi and the surroundings of kapitan run, we introduce interesting people, and in many ways they succeeded, they really often call our palace, and belarusian versailles for our belarusian scale. this is indeed a very significant palace. one of the largest one of the most magnificent palaces, showing local traditions and iconic sights, the territory of the modern national park was inhabited 1.000 years ago all this is a modern interpretation of the language promised once there were many such places. see in the program the route was built on the belarus 24 tv channel

.

what you need to know about the sacrament of communion

regular participation in the sacrament of communion brings our spiritual life into a certain tone? why do icons work wonders? there, yong became a smart chassis driven by yak in yalta, he was bringing the courts to deliverance, yes, helping. what is the basis of the spiritual life of a person with the end the earthly life of a person, the opportunity to change something in oneself ends, if on earth a person was able to purify his soul and adorn its virtues, then in this state his soul enters eternity. what is the power of faith that is manifested in the temple when we are present at the service. it shows up in our families when we try. according to their children, loved ones still educate. e vere e,

the basis of which is the observance of the commandments of god, the answers to these and other questions in spiritual and educational projects on the tv channel belarus 24. the program sas is authorized to announce i am the presenter nadezhda sas greetings, let me remind you. this is a program

for those who want to better understand what is happening in the world and understand how these processes, events, people will affect the life of everyone and the life of the country, and the main events of world politics this week. we will tell you right now the head of the european commission, ursula von der. ryan suddenly made a big hole in ukrainian official propaganda. simply by naming the figure of 100,000 when describing the losses of the armed forces ukrainian german. i wanted to emphasize the horrors of the russian invasion, but did not take into account the fact that the zelensky regime carefully hides losses at the front from its own citizens. fearing the truth to undermine their faith in victory, the revelation of the foundation caused such indignation in kiev that a fragment of the speech of the head of the european commission was even cut out from the one posted on her page in terfail, and the press secretary of the european commission began to prove that we are talking about the total number of dead and wounded all. this only

increased interest in the topic and helped overclocking, resolving an important news myth. moreover, dissatisfaction with the concealment by the authorities of the scale of losses among military personnel has long been ripening in ukraine. china is undergoing the most massive protests in the last 30 years, the reason for student unrest was dissatisfaction with the authorities' strict quarantine measures, forcing hundreds of thousands of people to stay in isolation for weeks and months, for cases of coronavirus detected in one or another group. the so-called zero tolerance covid policy, when broad oil, they simply do not allow the virus to pass through. and thus, the combination with vaccination to receive herd immunity has long been criticized by specialists. in addition, it leads to significant losses for the national economy. yes, and ordinary chinese in their mass are less afraid of infection. than necessary. to live in almost permanent quarantine,

however, there are no signs yet that the protests will force the authorities. china to change the approach of the event. in china, belarusian observers were allowed to note that the choice of the leadership of our country strategy to fight the pandemic turned out to be over. isolated to the implementation of medical measures without creating excessive additional difficulties for the economy and society this week in minsk said goodbye to vladimir makei minister of foreign affairs passed away november 26 a funeral service was held in the house of officers. one of the first to come there was the president of belarus.

also from representatives of authorities, public and political figures and abroad throughout his career, vladimir makei was a true patriot of belarus, he developed the best traditions of belarusian diplomacy and did everything to strengthen the authority of our country in the international arena. yes, i want to note that vladimir vladimirovich makei was a supporter of a multi-vector approach, which contributed to the successful development of the state of successful foreign policy activities of the republic of belarus. but today we will talk a little about another about the future of the world system. on the future of the world order, i want to note that the english historian alan taylor once wrote and although formally the meaning of achieving the status of a great power is to acquire the ability to fight in a big war. only by avoiding such a

war can one remain a great power for a long time and the wisdom of a great sign such a history of diplomacy indicates that despite the bellicose rhetoric, all the leading powers of the world strive to build a system of relations that will prevent a world war. and what will it be system and how many i think the poles we'll talk about today's program. i am glad to welcome alexey dzermond, who is already present in our studio. political scientist good evening and viktor nikolaevich litovkin military observer taz political scientist of the russian federation hello good evening and first of all we start our program with millet blitz, superpower. still alone or no longer alone? what do you think alexey in my opinion, it is definitely not the only one. although, she heads a very serious western bloc and, together with allies in asia, and this bloc is trying to

maintain its hegemony, but this is no longer working, neither in the economy nor in the military-political sphere, so this is most likely. a declining hegemon against the background of the fact that new superpowers have emerged and are growing, that is, we are at the moment of transition from a unipolar model to a multipolar one, or in any case more diverse. yes, and viktorovich, please, or what to call a superpower? this is very important. yes, blue, whether she is a superpower economically , or militarily, or military-political respect. well, in general, in others in the development of a person, freedom of a person is freedom of speech, and so on and so forth, so here you can speak differently, but certainly

one of the superpowers is generally accepted. this is the united states but if china, which in economic terms is in no way inferior to the united states in terms of e, as if in terms of per capita income, it even surpasses it. the united states walks the latest data, yes , a diplomat candidate of political sciences joins our air. well, i think you follow our conversation that has just begun, i suggest you answer the blitz question of a superpower. still alone or no longer alone, and in general, what criteria are necessary to meet the status of a superpower, and in your opinion. i greet the distinguished participants of the discussion and the audience about your program. eh, i think that, nevertheless, according to the criterion, let's say, the key one in my understanding for a great power. it's the possession of a power that, er, is greater than all the other great steps

combined. uh, probably even the united states today it is not possible to call it a full-fledged superpower. that is, they are one and only and cash is really without what is near the bloc of the state that they rely on their own can not resist. let's say. so this is an incredible situation, of course, in which everyone united against the united states about this. but if this happened on their own, everyone would not start to cope with it, therefore, by and large, if you approach it very strictly, then probably there is no such thing in the world today, no superpower. although of course, of course, the united states stands for this status. much closer than any other country in the world. it's easy, look, viktor nikolaevich correctly noted. let's still define our definition, please, colleagues. on the screen what is a superpower, so that everything becomes clear and understandable to our viewers, a superpower is an independent state with huge cultural, political, economic and military potentials, including a superpowerful nuclear potential, a superpower has superiority

over most other states, which allow it to exercise hegemony not only in its region, but also in the most remote parts of the world. by what criteria do you think it should be ranked. this is a power, because, if you look at purely economic indicators, germany also seems to be a more powerful player on the world stage than even the russian federation, although in practice we understand that this is absolutely not the case. and if we are talking about a specific leader, yes, here is today's germany of mr. schulz, but it looks like an absolutely spineless state. well, in my opinion. here in this definition is. uh, key thing super-powerful nuclear potential in my opinion, after all, a superpower must have this criterion. that is, if the state has such a potential that it can destroy the enemy or even the entire planet. this is already a sign, at

least for superpowers. this means that you are already included in the strategy game around the future is integral. not just nuclear weapons, for example, north korea also has them israel but here is the ability to destroy the enemy, the united states for example, or even the entire planet. it's a sign the fact that they will already speak to you differently. all the rest, it means that you are recognized by certain superstatus, which is not available even to some other nuclear states viktor nikolayevich do you think that without nuclear weapons in the modern world, a state can not defend its own? of course, so well, here is kim jong-un has a nuclear weapon. and no matter how many sanctions were announced to him. no matter how many claims were made against him, no matter how he was given. nobody touches his state. here is adam hussein and gaddafi did not have nuclear weapons. we

know what happened to them. but e donald trump drove three attack aircraft carrier formations on each aircraft carrier, 90 aircraft, to the waters of north korea. he promised to turn north korea into a radioactive field. and that he quickly got out of there, because he was afraid of an attack on american military bases in south korea, and here is another key word in my opinion. an independent state is important. well, france has nuclear weapons. uh, great britain are they independent states? i would question this question why. because both countries are members of nato, and any country that is a member of nato, it signs that it allocates part of its sovereignty to its independence headquarters in nato’s headquarters, and in fact washington, so today it’s not uh biden travels to paris to agree

on how to conduct nato's policy, and macron travels to washington and tries to negotiate with washington and biden on how to live on. let's pay attention to the map, which marked the potential superpowers, please, alexey in your opinion. european union. we can call it this unification of the state, as there is no superpower. at the moment, the first questions is this is the power of the state. and this is a hybrid between an international organization and some kind of bloc with signs of a federal structure, but we also understand that in political and military-political terms, as the european union and even the most independent sovereign, supposedly his states. such as france, they are still subordinate, uh, or brussels, and in the form of the eu and nato or washington, that is, the european union. in my opinion, it does not have

a sufficient degree of sovereignty of sovereignty in order to make decisions in its own interests. that is why it now suffers in many respects from the sanctions, uh, that are introduced by, let's say, higher-ranking players. but with this, remember the legendary question. uh, gentleman from stalin how many divisions does the pope have and now this is the real influence of the vatican on world diplomacy is very significant oleg here is a question for you. here is a rather interesting question, if the united states of america after 1945 was still the strongest country in the world. why is washington working so hard to create and develop various alliances, although the same donald trump, the forty-fifth president of the united states, believed that america should play alone. yes. uh, the main task is to make america strong again, and in fact by the number of allies by the united states,

of course, no one compares, and even tandem in russia, china, and yet a little different. well , actually, the united states, when they need it, and act, in general, alone. uh, without much regard for their even formal most important allies. we can recall the war in iraq in 2003 , which was also very openly and consistently opposed by france and germany . that did not prevent, for example, the family states from undertaking an invasion of iraq, neglecting the opinion of the allies, and many other similar situations. not only under trump, under other presidents. now a large-scale scandal is unfolding between the european union and the united states over the infinition reduction act, legislation to reduce inflation was adopted in the united states, which provides for a number of subsidies for american industry, which can seriously undermine the position of european industry, and this is absolutely not allied behavior, but, nevertheless less the united states in this does not look back. why do they rely on

unions two things, first, it is clear obvious. and here's the easiest one is that, naturally. they simply thereby shifting part of the time, and economic to the loss of human costs e costs for the same military operations and so on to other countries, but, more importantly, something else. uh, the united states is unlike any other country. today, claiming status. e of the great power, especially since there is a potential superpower has a certain ideology, it does not claim to be universalism. that is, to promote their set of values ​​on their ideological agenda to the whole world in this situation. naturally, is the creation of a circle of countries that demonstrate their commitment to this particular geological platform in this key situation with the union after all, when we say the same west, they call themselves that. these are certain conspiracies there. naturally, not everything is so simple, but forgive everything. this is a certain set of values ​​and it is not so important, for example, what specific formal relations are associated, the united states, for example,

with japan or with australia or with new zealand? all absolutely. it's clear what's there on key issues relation to the future of mankind? to the rules of conduct and so on, the united states for example new zealand the united states and italy the united states and poland are on one side of the barrier, for example, the united states and the chinese the united states or the republic of belarus as a whole are on the other side of the barrier viktor nikolaevich and how are you can you characterize the role of medium-sized states such as saudi arabia, the same iran, turkey in the future of the world system. i think these states are acquire. they are developing their true independence and sovereignty today, and the development of economic states, military development, it allows, e, to raise their voice for the protection of their national interests. here you are the same turkey. pay attention to how turkey confronts the united states when the turks bought our

s400 complex, yes, an anti-aircraft system. i speak for our listeners. what kind of pressure was exerted here pay attention to greece was the s-300 complex. yes, also a member of nato or there were no problems there. but turkey bought s400 means problems, because they are connected to the nato system, uh, about the common one, and so on, entrusted to turkey, turkey put up, despite the continued blackmail. yes, to the attempted coup d'état in turkey and many other things that are still happening in turkey and turkey , uh, persistently pursues its national policy , the same thing in saudi arabia. you remember that saudi arabia has always been the gas station of the united states and today saudi arabia refuses, uh, president next president baidu in increasing oil production. yes, and proudly. e does not even shake hands with this president, too, to defend their interests. well, so are other states that today, on the one hand, are

weakening the united states, the hemogenesis of the united states is weakening yin, and against this background, their independence, their character of their own, is manifested, as it were, the ability to withstand pressure. turn is how the connections between the great powers, that is, its key nodes, are built, and the rest of the states. e can influence or influence, of course, in one way or another on these connections. but uh, if we remember why the system is called, for example, bipolar, yes, that, apart from the soviet union and the united states, there were no other states there, dozens were quite powerful, like china, india, there to some extent, there yugoslavia, and so on but bipolar, because there were two superpowers, there was a european concert, nova of which is there five key great powers interacting with each other, so, of course, uh

medium-sized states and even small ones, having strong-willed leaders there and knowing their weak strengths, having them to play in time on the contradiction of the great powers, can but influence the development of the international system. but, well, what the system will become as a whole really depends on the nodes, so we will look at the same erdogan's turkey . he offers all efforts. in order for turkey by the time e, when it settles down, but the international system. and it will probably take 5-10 years there, but it has reached the level. well, let's say if it didn’t reach, for example, there the influence of the same russia and india, well, somewhere approached. uh, according to a number of indicators, that is, just counting on the fact that turkey can be, for example, or iran a second-rate state, but those who will create the nodes of the system will take into account it, this is naive, so the key will be who sits down this big table. here, relatively speaking, there is a new one, yalta. yes, if it takes place there, let the president of russia be there, let's say the leader of the prc, uh, the leader is more or less. well, there, if

nothing dramatic happens, these three 100% representative will be like whatever their names are. yes. and who else is fighting for this now, and the same active position of turkey, also the vigorous activity of iran, is aimed at trying as much as possible up to an attempt to create a grain weapon, as in the case of iran, i do not exclude that the tour will follow this path, but jump out to this level, in order to be at the same table almost on an equal footing, well, relatively on an equal footing with russia, china and the united states alexey and tell me, please, here we are primarily interested in interest, if i may say so, of the republic of belarus, here is how a state such as belarus today builds its foreign policy and how to behave correctly in order to remain always strong during this period of transformation and to be considered with you, firstly, you need to correctly assess the current moment, in which we are.

unfortunately, the estimates are extremely alarming, in fact. we are on the front line. in this struggle, it is important, first of all, to defend the security of the country, so that our opponents do not have even back in the west the slightest doubt that any of their attack is sabotage. warm provocation will meet the toughest response. this is, in principle, the first condition for them to understand that war is inevitable in this case, a large-scale war. eh, this is where all negotiations begin, as soon as the enemy understands that you are strong, then they will not attack you, but will try to negotiate further. if we agree, we must show that we are not just there isolated by someone. yes, we have our blog our allies. this is the immediate environment post-soviet, let's say space, therefore, you will have to work as allies in order to exploit

a certain union into a more disciplined one, plus allies of the far arc. well, first of all, china, iran , perhaps, india. here in this configuration, when we stand, we will show our strength in the form of a bloc. uh, with the closest allies and allies a little further away on these terms. we can agree, and we will naturally have our own voice and position in this configuration. i am sure of this. by the way, at the collapse of the unipolar world, he expressed his intention and president of the republic of belarus alexander lukashenko let's listen, the world will no longer be the same, the united states is no longer a monopoly on decision-making for other countries and continents, the unipolar order is collapsing and new centers of power are emerging. this and china this and india this and russia the countries of the middle east latin america the world is waking up. therefore, trying to keep control from the world's policeman

, the united states turns into a world terrorist. you know, i would like to note that formally, alliances are currently fading into the background and now is the time of states with their own course with their own vision and the time of bright leaders. and here, notice. we remembered, not in vain, mr. asholz, or else we will take it. yes, here is a state that is larger in territory in terms of military potential than the republic of belarus, but there is no bright leader, an indistinct foreign policy, and therefore no one takes into account the opinion of the state. i share your opinion about the leader, of course, the state must be a bright leader, that's for sure. this man who should lead the nation determine the tasks of the goal of this nation and by his personal example he will unite the nation, but i do not quite agree with you about the fact that the allies are losing their

place on the world stage today depending on what kind of alliances, if it's like nato where subordinate to the united states and play according to the rules established by the united states, no one needs such an alliance, because he is the united states is the exploiter of this alliance. yes, but the alliance is such as brix where all equal states and they united in order to to cooperate together on equal terms, respecting each other, taking into account national interests , and so on and so forth. i think that such unions should be increased, there should be more of them, but certainly there should be national leaders who will defend the national interests of this or that state. that's about the european union, after all. let's pay attention, after all. uh, now there are no leaders in europe who are able to defend national interests. and this is no coincidence. it is the united states that educates

these people. all of them have been trained in the united states. the united states has done. e, like a filter and such that no one can come to power. there is a lipen in france, yes, a wonderful woman who puts forward national interests, where she elects some kind of macron , it is not known where it came from. yes growth assistant, where did he come from? and who's busy? i don't want to offend my husband and my teacher. yes, here. well, is it the leader of france? therefore, the person who replaced mithran de gaully and so on and so forth similar. well, tell me bitterly for france, please, in your opinion, if we talk about the united kingdom, could it take a certain place in the multipolar world, if the concept of global britain has a chance to come true, or if we are talking about the

need to have a bright leader , in this case it is not available in britain. or maybe you don't agree with me? absolutely right. by the way, this is an interesting example of versatility, uh, the political process, there really is, uh, nations are cultures, political cultures, traditions, where indeed, uh, the absence of a strong leader leads to the inevitable chaos of disintegration, and so on and vice versa, uh, and in a different way, e structures are built, where there are very strong consolidated establishments that have their own environment. in general, it can single out a strong leader. or maybe not, and there are not so many such polities, let’s say political associations, but even in great britain this is a vivid example, but there are few countries where we can observe such a political whisper that occurs regularly in the united kingdom. even this year we observed, but simply phantasmagorically, and circus

stories associated there with crises with a move 40 days after coming on after with in fact, as some joke sheet. prime minister only to worthily see off the last journey of the english queen elizabeth there and so on. this is the only thing she will be remembered for, but no one will deny that, for example, in the same conflict in ukraine, in many other stories of great britain , she plays a very, very significant role. it has a colossal intelligence apparatus much more more competent than many other intelligence agencies, than the american society is divorced, and it has the status of one of the financial centers of the world. sometimes the impression is called that this could be saxon, but these are not tandems; there are five fi-fays, the so-called five main countries there, but i remind you of this besides the united states of great britain. canada australia new zealand and what exactly is he there, and not washington, leading in this five of the endo-saxon countries, that is, in the absence of a leader, and sometimes with such enough. well, let's say, the leaders under whom any state in

space has long since collapsed. great britain manages to remain a key cancer. this speaks to the strength of britain's political class. and the traditions and the fact that there really are some societies, uh, in which the presence of a strong leader would even be harmful for this society . the same, by the way, partly applies to the united states of america. and we remember the features of mr. trump and the current president, honestly speaking too. well, far from know theodore roosevelt and the franks in head. excuse me, no dandies came out and no wilson, a few others not reagan and a few other great leaders of this state, but nevertheless , no one cancels the fact that the united states, by virtue of the fact, again, here is the structure, why do i say the structure they occupy such a place for the first time, for example, the financial system, that there you can, you know, put a comedian from a talk show to lead this country, and the result will be completely different, not to manage a comedian. this is

a talk show oleg really. i wish now to talk about the differences between the present moment and the bipolar system and i would like to quote. ah, the american historian the second world war left only two states, america and the ussr, in a state of political ideological and military dynamism, making them able to fill the resulting power vacuum wrote arthur schlazinger and it would be truly amazing if there were no cold war, a bipolar system of international relations. more details in our story, world war ii completely destroyed the multipolar model of the world, previously leading powers such as great britain germany italy france japan were either defeated and occupied, or seriously weakened the world became bipolar the new system of international relations was headed by the former

military allies of the ussr and the usa between two nuclear the physical survival of all mankind depended on the powers, and nuclear weapons themselves became the most important structural component of the future cold war. war between the soviet union and the united states. a confrontation unfolded under irreconcilable ideological slogans, the two superpowers began to divide the world, while actively interfering in the affairs of third countries and trying to win them over to their side by any means, however, not being able to fight openly with each other, the united states of the soviet union resisted with the help of satellite countries used everything from financial assistance to direct military support. the aggravation of the conflict happened after the us deployment of medium-range missiles on in turkey, the distance was enough for them to fly to moscow of a number of other large cities of the soviet union, in response to this, the ussr placed

missiles in cuba in its missiles. however, a nuclear war was avoided, and the final stage of the cold war was total time. the wave of communist regimes, in many countries of the world, the end of the cold war led to colossal shifts in the balance of power on the world stage and to the end of the bipolar system of international relations. yes, alexey, you know our brain is arranged in such a way that it is easier for us to perceive some things through analogies. and so, for example, the confrontation between moscow and washington began today, they immediately started talking about a new cold war, but in fact, the situation is radically different and at least there is no clear ideological confrontation, because today russia is groping for a conservative ideology, as a counterbalance to hmm globalist posthumanism, although and there are quite a lot of conservatives among republicans. and yet a. what is the main difference

you see between the state of affairs today and the cold war period? well, first i'll argue a little your about the absence of an ideological factor. that is, he is absent. uh, as if the only ideology of communism left the russian side, yes, but russian society or russian civilization. it is also based on certain deep-seated values, which remained even when they were combined with communism. it turned out to be the soviet system, and then there was such a view. these are ideologies. now, for example, there is no mandatory communism. but there are some things they are in the form of conservatism, or they can be in the form of logic purely geopolitical. yes, but all the same, these things that determine the attitude of western people towards russia have not gone away, so i would not flatter myself with the illusion that the ideology has gone. she just took on a new form. but, what is the difference and what to make the listing situation much more dangerous

after all, when yes, there are two players of a large superpower between them, here is the tension of the conflict caribbean crisis. they then agree on certain rules, then the process of agreement on reduction and containment is launched there, uh arms race. they develop some kind of rules of interaction warning from each other about the danger. and now look, this whole system of practically agreements has collapsed. there is no such thing. well, let's just say a direct dialogue. he is, of course, there are special services. all this is there just in case, it is preserved, but now the security architecture has collapsed and nothing new has come in its place. and this means even more vulnerability has appeared and some incidents may arise. and how to work with them, if necessary to find out if a submarine with nuclear weapons is going there, it is a danger to russia or the united states but there can be many such moments and therefore the situation is much more dangerous than in the first

cold war. viktor nikolayevich well, you are, first of all, a military observer. tell me, please, that the reorganization of the world always took place on the basis of global wars. is this time it's inevitable, well, a global war. i think that it is being pushed back because as long as russia has nuclear missile weapons, no less than the united states but note here is a treaty on the reduction and limitation of strategic offensive arms. only we have the latest treaty between russia and the united states, and in the united states it is an agreement based on equal forces. yes, the united states was forced to conclude this treaty, the united states was forced to extend this treaty. although trump did not want to renew it. here he tried to blackmail us, but biden, just came to the white house, and he was immediately one of the first decrees that he signed this agreement to extend it for 5 years, that

is, the united states. well, the word fear is probably wrong, but they respect our nuclear missile potential, and nevertheless, the united states is trying to destroy our country with other third parties, therefore, i i think that this is a global war. she, of course, is on the doorstep. she threatens us, but the fact that she will happen. i hope it won't happen in my lifetime. i would also like to draw attention to our plasma, draw a map of the spheres of influence of the soviet union the united states of america at the final stage, and the cold war states that were allies of the soviet union green of the united states of america aleksey , i read an important difference between moscow's current line and the position of the soviet union precisely in the fact that

today's russia is in no hurry to finance allies around the world there are a number of close states that receive some financial assistance, some support, but still it is impossible to compare with the billions that the soviet union invested only to africa alone, or even some of their own citizens at that moment suffered from this. in this sense, a new confrontation between the great powers. here, in your opinion, does not mean a certain amount of assistance for third world countries. well, because as we say superpowers, this is a state that can see it influence other states and the influence can be different, both ideological and financial. well, here's the question. uh, let's just say in ambition, as far as i can see, while russia does not show global

ambitions. she would like to have a security sphere in eurasia but, well, maybe some kind of relationship with allies on other continents, but first of all , we are talking about russia's own security and the immediate environment. uh, therefore, it naturally makes sense to invest in far abroad countries to set especially friendly regimes there. no for today . this is for now. well, russia can change its strategy a little. if the victory is won. if it starts, let's say a slightly different alignment. well, so far so, uh, and we still live here the question is why certain countries are supported americans are still investing in a friendly regime in order to maintain global hegemony or to restrain someone, that is, along the perimeter. china, russia, friendly regimes are put in there, money is pumped in so that they restrain russia’s opponents, respectively. either china, let’s say, for the time being, no one really has such a task, even the chinese, if they invest latin america in africa first of all, well,

actually the economic benefit of development for this is happening and they , of course, they get from there, that is, control over resources. now the logic has changed a bit. well, relatively speaking, the predators grappled with each other. that's who will come up with the logic after this struggle. that is, how can we, together on the planet, agree between the poles, which will already determine their strength and the limit of the enemy's influence on them will be seen. then, perhaps, a slightly different situation will come, the same multipolar world. but until we test the limits of each other's strength, oleg will not come, and the last question for you is talking about dialogue of the logical component of the policy of different states today. really. and every state that claims to be a superpower is trying to form. dialogue content, but tell me if we are talking about a future multipolar world, how different ideologies are possible,

how they can coexist, because if we take the liberal agenda, which is now still taking over, in the lives of american citizens. and, of course, and the favored elites dream that this agenda, this ideology, will capture the whole world a very short remark on the previous part and taste, if you will, and about uh, the thing that, unlike the cold war, is that the united states is not helping anyone much today either. finance is a key tool for influencing the elites of different countries. they have it today as a tool of punishment through a very well- designed, and in uh, well-thought-out. uh honed so much in the period of so-called counter-uh, international terrorism sanctions today. states can control almost any deal. uh, passing conducted in dollars in euros or other currencies of western countries and e, let's say. here is a very

simple example. yes, too, let's say serbia yes , despite the fact that there is total support here, let's say sympathy it is clear to russia there historically closer to china and so on, nevertheless, the leadership is pursuing a multi-vector balanced policy. you just understand that otherwise they will fall under uh, the most severe skating rink of financial punishment. and this is exactly what the united states controls so many elites today, including and in certain countries after this space and even in russia, influencing those who have yacht houses and so on, because this is the mechanism by which the united states today can achieve more than if they just someone gave money, they don't even have to give money. they just know where who is. i'm sorry i stole it and they can either let them use it or they can seize it. this is the key tool by which the united states uh, today uh, governs the elite in many countries. they have corruption, they do not fight corruption, they manage corruption. this is an important element. uh , to understand what the american influence meanders today in many respects and about ideology

, very briefly, i will try to say, yes, indeed. eh, today. uh, there is a chance that, while russia will formulate a number of other countries, but this, by the way, is interesting, not in opposition to the west, but as part of the struggle for another west well, because , roughly speaking, we are still part of me, at least , so i perceive myself, many people my views are part of this large historical christian there are christian people, if you want civilizations that are based, say, on the bible there on other sacred texts with a certain set of values. in any case, for us, the same china, which in some ways can be close and understandable, but in general as a civilization. it 's completely different. we can't. well, i can’t imagine that for me, for example, the chinese had no idea what yes, so, here, if we can, and along with those constructive forces conservative christian. which exist today both in the usa and in europe, let's say, to rebuild our relations and build these bridges from this, and

russia in this sense can play both russia and belarus, let's say, and even ukraine in the future, how all the same i am based on my christian e, traditionalist society, but can play your role, then it is really possible to qualitatively change the so-called west here. this is exactly what, by the way, the globalist cast are actually afraid of. why were they screaming so loudly all the time? stop trump. and putin although there is no connection between them. in fact, there weren’t any collusions there, in fact there weren’t, but from the point of view, for example, the attitude towards lgbt uh, family values ​​and so on trump viktor orban in hungary alexander lukashenko in belarus uh director dagan in turkey on the one hand, and macron. uh, biden, there are other proponents of this new lgbt new transgender ethic. and other things, they are on the other hand, that's all, that is, in fact, russia and the west are not doomed to confrontation, they are doomed to the confrontation of traditionalist conservative

societies, and so the globalist elite, which today in the west are also asking. yes, thank you, oleg voloshin, a diplomat, was in touch with us. the sass program is authorized to announce whether a global concert of great powers is possible and let's remember that the names of such prominent diplomats as prince talleyrand, russian foreign minister alexander gorchakov, chancellor. otto van bismarck lit all these stars the era of the balance of power and the concert of europe then diplomats needed to know a lot languages ​​to know history to be able to beautifully state their mental walk arguments and finally think, because everything was decided behind closed doors and in a dispute of equals now look at the head of the german foreign ministry she speaks with slogans that under the camera, that without the worst thing, that for the amusement of the broad masses diplomacy turned into a show where everything is shown, but now

i would like to remind our viewers. what was the european concert. the european concert is a system of international relations that has developed in the consent of the great european powers in the period from 1814 to 1914 after the revolutionary and napoleonic wars, it gave europe the longest period in history without major wars. large-scale diplomatic congresses, where priority was given to multi-level bargaining and behind-the-scenes agreements, the system ensured the flourishing of diplomatic art and the colonial division of the world by european powers. you know today in the mode of the frontal place of the project house-2.

it is impossible to solve global issues, and that's why if a power wants to prevent a world war, a big war, somehow further interact, they still need to return to classical diplomacy behind closed doors viktor nikolayevich what do you think? whether a global concert of great powers is possible today, i strongly doubt, because no one has canceled competition and it is impossible to cancel it. competition is a source of development of the dialectical development of all states, therefore yes, the diplomacy of the concert of europe was, uh, based on the greatness of the economic and the dependences of the economic dependences of states. great russia, the bread power was not to mention the fact that it was a great military power and europe was forced to reckon with it. such bread is how today we know the story of how you carry bread from odessa. yes, he is ukrainian bread

, russian bread is being brought out of novorossiysk, it turns out that there is again a great need for our bread. yes, and therefore some concessions are being made for us for our country, but so it is in russia was russia was. after she defeated napoleon and everyone had to reckon with russia, we tell me there were big wars. yes , there were big wars, the russian-turkish war. remember the liberation of bulgaria. and remember, as alexander iii said without my permission, not a single gun fires in europe. it was e, they reckoned with russia, they had to reckon with it, but it was built. hungary was. uh, there was an alliance between germany and france, there was conflict all the time. yes, there were english colonies, which, in india, are everything happened. uh, the rebellion were the suppression of these. revolts also in indocia france and so on. each country had sources of economic

power at that time then at that moment, yes, therefore they were forced to reckon with each other, but today there is the united states and there is the european union, with which the united states does not reckon , because the european union has already been forced act under uh at the request of the united states operation you. pay attention to a small detail, the united states forced european union whitewashes us with sanctions the european union is losing a lot of money on these sanctions, while the united states continues to talk about sanctions. keep trading with us. they buy our wounds from 15 to 40% of american nuclear power plants operated by russian earlier. they buy our oil. they buy ours. uh, the titan is not just a titan, we make it for boeings, e, the components are on the territory of russia and the titan

did not hit us. not under any sanctions. i will tell you more about the first flights of our gas carrier with liquefied gas. crosses de margirie from sabet, you know where he went on the northern sea route to the united states, the very first voyage went to the united states, we took hmm 350,000 cubic meters there. e liquefied gas, so the united states has been exploiting europe for its own interests both military and economic indeed since the second world war. this whole european concert turned its back on the soviet union. unfortunately, but today it’s true that the european union, as an association of states, how the union has lost its power and is gradually turning all this united states of america what do you think, in general , if we bring today's multipolarity program to the final? of course, to be, but for this i

would have a little inner feeling, and in russia we have me here, i would argue with a colleague who spoke on the link. he says, we are a european, a christian country, but after all, russia is not only a european, but also an asian country, and not only a christian, but also a muslim country, therefore, for a balanced sense of self, you need to feel like a eurasian country. yes yes there is european, no one refuses this, but these hopes that the conservatives will come to power there, and we will agree with them again, this is an illusion. even if they come, well, trump was 5 years old, and that he tried to get out, he could not agree, but lipen. she votes all the votes of the entire national front. the french adopts anti-russian resolutions and according to historical memory and now therefore rely on right-wing traditionalist conservatives. this is an illusion , they do not need us as a strong subject, therefore, an internal one is needed. how to develop nastya

only oriented to europe and the west but they also say to asia, we will never understand each other with the chinese, and you tried, but it turned out, but remember the agreements of the russian empire, which established the border between russia and china for a century, so, if we want, we can, therefore, we need to get rid of this eurocentrism imposed and say we are a middle state. we have europe and asia, we can normally negotiate with everyone, if we are treated with respect, here is the one who relates to whom we started who relates to iran turkey china and these let them wait until they suffer all the hardships from those sanctions from those barriers that they introduce against us, therefore, for now, cold detachment and certainly not be led by these antics that here we respect russian, there conservative culture. they will first try to deceive, and only then will they negotiate when they see the strength and power that is worth it. behind us

here we put an end to this grateful, respected guests for the discussion, well, the fact is that all past systems of international relations everything was born from the fire of global conflicts, and now the existence of nuclear weapons makes us believe in the possibility of a different path and hope that diplomats will be able to build a new building. until the wreckage of the old is buried at all. well, now the cas is authorized to declare. the multipolar world would otherwise be an alternative to it would be nuclear war let's set off on a grandiose journey through belarus for sure. many have heard that

the geographical center of belarus is located in this region . but not everyone knows that this is the only region. whose name does not coincide with the name of the district center in the form of a gate and 1067, the date of the first mention of the city in the tale of bygone years, professional guides of local history were using a winch through the door to raise bags of grain, transfer author's routes and interesting places to this beam. you know the holy trinity church immediately by its cornflower blue domes. an architectural monument grew in this place at the beginning of the 19th century, more than nine centuries have passed since the creation of the unique friske . together with us to belarus 24 famous soviet

belarusian. geographer polar explorer man-legend. do not believe it, the first object of the electric power of the belarusian antarctic station is a three-section navigation communication control module. mounted four people in total and we are not rich enough to buy or build cheap things or structures to do. uh, such objects once and for all he visited 15 scientific expeditions in antarctica and brought up more than one generation of polar explorers. i think that this is not only pride. eh, those who created the station directly with their own hands, those who designed it. and this, uh, must be given credit for the development, exclusively belarusian manufacture made in belarus, assembled by hands, belarusians, the white severe continent and its researcher alexei gaydashov. uh, you know, i'm not

afraid of these loud words of someone you while they are loud, but we needed a party. it was in the country. it was this feeling, watch friday on our channel. together with the stars, expert psychotherapists, whenever a person has some unrealistic. the goal is not achieved, which in itself is understandable. it can always be justified. probably you have not completed something, let's discuss the topical issues that we face every day. it's like the amount of money limited checks, please bring, i'll see what you spend on. so here is the total control of a woman who works as a muse and a keeper of the hearth. she risks that one day. she will cease to be interested in her man to safely resolve any conflict situations. man need with the base to work with their

roots. why did his tree not cling to this earth. look at the program of the concept of harmlessness on belarus 24 tv channel. smart , erudite and inquisitive guys, i answered no, because i thought that 3 million people were too large a part of the population for the 16th century. in fact, i don’t know, but it seems to me that this assumption will show their best qualities, but i remember that i read that plato taught everyone, which means that he did not teach and those who did not know geometry would solve a lot assignments figured out that 3^4 would be 81, if i'm not mistaken, and four in the third - it will be 64 answer questions from different areas of scientific knowledge. as far as i remember from the lessons of russian literature, and most often he signed, either as a cover, or as chekhov watch

intellectually entertaining shows. i know on tv channel belarus 24.