there is a medicine prescribed there - these are just components or personnel, which is very important. this is just a component of the quality in itself, as an integral indicator for a person is, uh, our fundamental social state, which is a state for the people, which once again reminded me of the state in the context of work with the healthcare system. the result will be 10 million 600,000 tons. these are grain legumes corn and cruciferous. this is a very good result of the forecast justified or actually? yes, it must be said that this is a record we have had a harvest in modern history.

that's why we got it. well, you know, we practically increased. we all planted more sugar beet potatoes. or more, the bottom three hundred have been prepared, they have practically completed in all respects. uh, topped last year. and what are we doing if we increase almost everything, that is, we have increased the sown area in the country. you know that we are increasing the area under crops. but this is the minimum volume, it cannot be said that a large amount is added in the republic simultaneously. here. ah, technology, of course. first of all, we had a very favorable country , and about the president's government they very seriously lent us all agrarians a shoulder. uh, in providing, above all, fuel. we

took the repair of our equipment very seriously, and we did it all, and, of course, the availability of mineral fertilizers is very high, so there was a return. and as for his attraction of additional lands, all turns. you must have seen the last one. uh, a meeting with the head of state, a walkie-talkie grinder, so, i mean, that we have about 400,000 hectares of land that we must restore, reclaim and put everything into circulation in the next 3 years. this is what we now face with grandiose tasks, another important task for the export of an oriented state. again export is our outsourced sale. what markets are in priority today? what are promising both for the export of raw materials and for the export of ready-made products, you know what? well, as for the export of raw materials, as a rule, the republic of belarus does not export. do you know that we do not export our grain? why because, well, us first. we need a need for our animal to ensure the country's food security in the form of let's say bakery bread and villages and pasta.

flour and so on. as for our products, then, of course, a year. we started thinking, uh, that it would not be a very good result, because the logistics, uh, connected with the special operation in ukraine, uh, had changed. the port of odessa was completely closed. and we needed it as soon as possible. let's just say, uh somehow logistically on our chain. satisfied with others it turned out that everything worked and worked very well. after nine months. we have already sold our products for 6 billion dollars, almost 126% growth compared to last year. and this year we will make a record in terms of exports, we will cross the line. 8 billion. i want to remind you that last year we had six and seven, as for markets, of course, we have, uh, the main trading partner remains the russian federation, if you look at russia and the cis countries, almost 79% of all exports. we

supply exactly there, but we are interested in others markets. and there is more. what horizons to expand in terms of external sales. well, today there are already more than 100 countries of the world. therefore, we are practically present on every continent. i would probably say here that we need to go into more detail. uh, some countries and increase some country-specific volumes and sales, because the market is acceptable, it is china. vedane to no one, even if we grew more than 160% of our sales in 9 months in china. but that's only going to half a billion dollars. and if you understand the volume of the population of china, we understand that we have just taken the first step, so let's plan to increase exports for our country every year. here uh. well, for export. it is also necessary to increase the volume of production of both milk and meat, and this is also the main task.

hello in belarus one and belarus 24 editors club program will discuss the most interesting most important topics. everything that is discussed in our country and in the world. well, established tradition. let me introduce guests who came to us today in the studio on makayonka street. nine yes head of belarus holding today is our traditional bone, party eglu editors dmitry alexandrovich zhuk . irina akulovich head of belttan. vadim elfimov political historian expert e. vadim head of the knowledge society aleksey belyaev head of the department of political science of the state economic university candidates

of historical sciences. good evening. thank you very much for coming to our today's program. the main episode airs on saturday. this is a new time. uh, a new format, for 2 months so far due to the fact that on friday evening, uh, the song x-factor was going live. the factor is now called this project, and everything is very unpredictable, you can leave after midnight, well, i really would didn’t want ours to come in or, uh, sat for 12 hours, that then it seemed to us that everything would be more convenient to watch the program, so, well, we’ll see how it goes. so let’s start where do we start? 2014 maidan took place in ukraine, we all know, the bloody maidan was shot heavenly hundred e, not everyone was agree in ukraine with what is happening in the center of kiev, in particular, there is the east, meaning the east of ukraine, including crimea, and we remember that people from these regions went to kiev in order to express their disagreement with the fact that happening. why didn't they agree? yes? well, firstly, it was a coup d'état initiated by extreme nationalists, and that's it. it was under the flag of such

tough russophobia. you remember that they were going to ban the russian language. i do not remember to what stage the law was adopted immediately after the coup, that they did abolish the law on the regional status of the russian language. yes, then these people who were against this began to beat hard and press on all fronts. you remember the buses stopped beating in the house. it's just that the murder in the house of trade unions was a mass murder of people initiated by the special services by the leadership of ukraine proved and and there is nothing for him to even argue about and many, many such cases. uh, naturally. the east disagreed. there were military units that began to organize self-defense units. well, that's all, in general, the conflict began to develop. he is in such a way that the ukrainian army was beaten mercilessly. do you remember the debaltsevo cauldron and some other ilovai cauldron? yes, the two cauldrons in which it was smashed were practically the ukrainian army. or rather, what at that time was e was left of this army. and

to tell the truth, it was possible, as i understand it, such people to overtake all this and end the question with this. what did they do, putin, and with the support of our president of the russian federation of belarus, then hmm minsk agreements were initiated signing the minsk agreements, we remember all this, putin insisted, we organized it. these are all cues, poroshenko has arrived. they signed it all. we remember, sleepless nights in the palace of independence and then the countries began. thing for eight years uh, putin just begged. uh, ukrainians sit down at the negotiating table. and, uh, comply with the minsk agreements. i don't remember all the details. i have not read this document for a long time, but there was nothing complicated there. it was necessary to hold elections in the east to give some kind of autonomy, some independence while maintaining these territories to store. eh, the russian language, and nothing else special needed to be done, nevertheless

, these are quite simple things and 8 years. no one did e, and now, it began to become clear what when the special operation began, on february 24, putin began it, he said that they didn’t leave a choice for the issue, he didn’t hit the details, but very soon it became. it is clear what was discussed. it was said that all these 8 years the ukrainian army was armed with the help of nato, trained and prepared for an attack on the donbass and crimea. they were going to return under their residence in these territories. uh, the mail took the first step of the war that is now happening special operation was inevitable. the question was. uh, who will be the first to start angela merkel this week. suddenly she spoke. in her words, the 2014 minsk agreement was an attempt to give ukraine time. they used this time to become stronger, which can be seen today in the ukraine of 2014-2015 . this is not today's ukraine, as we could

observe during the battles in the debaltseve area in early 2015. putin could easily then capture. i very much doubt that the nato countries could then have done as much as they are doing now to help ukraine. it was clear to all of us that this was a frozen conflict, that the problem had not been solved. but it was this one that gave ukraine the precious. uh, time is just, well, just a confession that the horses were getting ready. well, let's listen to what the president said, belarus, i am vladimir vladimirovich, my point of view. why did you express it, if it would be so, as she says, it's disgusting. but this is not so, and the way it is, in fact, it is not just disgusting this place is the world. i did n't expect that either. and uh, the president of russia said this, he did not expect such an attack, but the tanks. she acted petty disgusting, she wants to be in trend, the

minsk agreements and merkel's position, like others , including poroshenko, were then very serious. imagine after the minsk meetings of all the gatherings there, the whole world was talking, and that, well, they finally took a step and signed these agreements, the war stopped , people stopped dying. that's all, it will be positively evaluated today on that background to talk about the fact that they are with poroshenko well , consider this one, olund, whom she led by the hand in front of my eyes. they allegedly led a secret operation deceived all putin and everyone in the world there. gave pause to this war. if that were the case, that would be too much. you just know, that's deceived prepared

for war. well, if this is so, it is not, but if so, why then howl out, what is the war going on, you were preparing for it, and we know for sure in the near future. i told putin, we will publish these facts, as they should have been after the twentieth year of the rebellion in belarus, if the situation develops and they reach the border of the smolensk region, the troops will seize the power from us to start a war against russia from the donbass, the reason should be that russia seized foreign territories there, a war should have begun in xxi may in the twenty-second year. russia worked ahead of the curve, so russia should not be reproached for poroshenko’s statement to merkel with false statements that russia started a war of measures and poroshenko want to show their importance, that the ukrainian army. see the fight fought back with

one of the strongest armies in the world, because then they deceived everyone in minsk and the whole world was deceived, and russia, and so on, petty and disgusting. it doesn’t look like it’s true that they did it in order to deceive everything seriously, then it was already possible by this time, if they went, in the way that putin proposed and the agreement was concluded today. uh, except for the crimea, ukraine was integral, there was no war . it was serious, because i, excuse me, hung out between putin and poroshenko e passing information to each other. uh wishes requirements and so on, when he said that putin handed over the last time to poroshenko what will help restore what is destroyed, and the destruction was minimal. well, they didn’t go for it, they were preparing for war, but then no one thought like that,

as merkel poroshenko says today. therefore, if they beckoned and prepared for war, it’s disgusting. and what merkel says today to poroshenko is disgusting. this is a trend and they want to be in it, the second merkel does not want to be blamed today against the backdrop of events in ukraine. listen, you are there. you went with the olant. uh, you represented europe and you pushed ukraine or wherever you need to go. she begins to make excuses once again emphasizes vile and unworthy. it would be better to sit and not climb out. but with this, she crossed out everything that she did for germany and for the european union. and we took her seriously and russia took her seriously. but as you can see, they were mistaken, it seemed petty, just as petty as today's all the leaders of europe actually are. it all started 80 years

ago with the opening of a second front in europe then the west decided that it was necessary to limit the soviet union; today we consider russia to spread its influence to contain the old europe to contain. that’s when it started from that moment, they are fighting with us and will fight questions in methods, and we should absolutely not let ourselves be deceived about what to say vladimir but in addition to military training, a terrible ideological thing has happened in ukraine over these 8 years, yes, they returned the nazi ideology and today these neo zicists, right? sees himself with a flamethrower, and representatives of any other nation. forgive me in the barn, which they will burn no matter the belarusians, russian poles, remember the volyn line of the hungarians in transcarpathia. all the same, they have a different ideology , and this ideology is just warming up with the west. and what is the uniqueness of this operation of the west

and failed to direct. this is this nationalism against its main rival russia, that's what we will fight on the territory of russia at the expense of russia , and this also needs to be understood, because one thing is military and i want to say. that's what we need stop believing these unswerving comrades, they will still advance and achieve their goal, and their goal was and still must be said, just give me, please, here 30 seconds. immediately go to bed and notorious, how you can work with them merkel’s 2017 quote, both leaders declared that there was no alternative to the minsk agreements on the need to preserve the normandy format. this is about russia and ukraine merkel assured that the ukrainian side feels committed to

fulfilling the agreements to fulfill the minsk agreements, according to her, a road map is needed , can you imagine what she was carrying? yes, and what is it about the fact that in that quote, even the one that has now been given the first and second. i want to remind you, as our president said, yes, that i do not like to be a mediator, as if i feel what is happening even here, as they say on our minsk site. yes, belarus provided this calm, neutral platform, where it was possible to agree on everything and really resolve the issues of measurement, at least, but uh, that’s the same yes so to speak. yes, yes, there was a decker, yes, that is, a double bottom, which the west always has, you know , the president, apparently, felt this and did not want to join this particular mediation mission. well, he just provided this platform, which is concerning, if he returns to the plot about the coup d'état in ukraine and mrs. merkel, her role in what we said today. well, i always suspected that this was her own design under the main let's say, well, the writers, yes, the screenwriters happened in ukraine, it was the

united states of america and germany, which means directly in manual mode, madam, nuland, the us deputy secretary of state then managed these processes in ukraine, and madam. uh, merkel ensured this with the help of the minister of foreign affairs, then stein maya, who gave guarantees to the same yunukovych, so for them for the germans. from the very beginning, this was really a cover operation to remove, so to speak, ukrainian nationalists from under the blows after the debalists , it’s correct to say, and i just want to remind you of this recently. he said yes, and putin himself already here recently in a meeting with materials, yes, which are the soldiers who will enter. he said that it was necessary to take in 2016. that's how i realized that it was possible then to prevent all this. but then , it was at the call of merkel that these offensives were stopped. that is, she called putin and said, let's measure ourselves in some way, that is, she twice played this role. yes, at first she spent, as it turned out, that the forty-first year was nothing to say to us. uh, by and large,

the germans will not learn to reconcile. we have provided the germans decided a united germany, they do not by any means, if today the sco talks about revanchism , think how you can talk about a country that is a winner about revanchism. that is, they lost everything. yes, we are not finished. it seems to me that we somehow got through. this ninety-first year canceled the thirtieth anniversary. now we are preparing for 100 years of the soviet union and we believe that these were some changes as a result of perestroika. yes, there they won the western political ones in the cold war, including germany practically. the phenomenon and any concessions are considered weakness as a manifestation of sweetness on our part. i think it can be fixed after that. yes, but i was alerted, for example, recently the statement was a news bet. yes, the press secretary of the president of the russian federation vladimirovich putin, the well-known mr. medvedev, said that it was

interesting. yes, according to freud, medvedev's reserve is here we will not celebrate. it seems to me that until we truly understand what we have lost, we need to celebrate it. and what should be given meaning to the real? yes, to those events that took place the real historical truth to reveal, including to new generations. here we are not really getting rid of these delusions that you spoke about. do you know why he said so, and why it affects society, but it's all about the economic structure. we perfectly understand that today there is a country of oligarchic capitalism and those ideas that were proclaimed 100 years after the creation of the soviet union do not fit very well. i hope that one thing you said, after all, peskov and not putin, but like us shall we celebrate? well, listen less, peskov. i don’t understand at all what he brings one more thing to add. that's what they touched on. yes, the budapest memorandum. and that they cheated. i just found one interview. this is

an interview with kuchma that he gave a breakup of years, probably 15 years ago. yes, and the president was no longer there, but he said that when it was all signed to him. eh, he approached you with a battering ram. after all, this is a politician who at that time, probably, very many respected and did not read, those who are then, so he told kuchma, as he says, do not believes him documents. you are deceiving. that is, it was already at that time, of course. how do you say believe or not believe and never believe because that's all they do. in any case, early. why is the most experienced politician a socialist? and also, because france was repeatedly deceived? take france how many times it was driven last, when with these orders. when they actually squeezed out the defense order from the french, and when a puppet becomes the president, it’s a sin not to squeeze it out, yes macron, this is a well-known protege of the liberal oligarchic the united states conducted an act of e, anti-inflation,

which generally violates everything americans are actually a hoax. how did the americans stop the world trade organization. they do not appoint judges there for blocking, in general, the entire procedure of world trade. that's what i want, yes, and swear. she may herself be a big, deceiver, being a socialist is a socialist party. yes, he committed brought down all the relations of the soviet union. remember, this is a mass expulsion of diplomats and so on. that is, he also said one thing and another. i think that believe the west, just recently it is not necessary, because there is a french saying. she so sounds morality in affairs not present. that's all. yes, well, can i have more? yes, of course it's nice when we have a lot of smart people from the main topic. we have already outlined so many branches that we need to develop and develop them, but nevertheless, returning to the original event, yes, to the agreements, why were they signed? is there anything else to take into account? here dmitry alexandrovich correctly pays attention. what about on the one

hand? hey, it's not hard to fool me. i myself glad to be deceived, that is, those who took part in these negotiations on the part of russia. putin vladimir vladimirovich of course, this is a decisive factor, but he has advisers. he has an environment. we see the question even now, for example, there is actually a direct confrontation still going on. and we observe how a part of the russian elite and economic political sabotage many things. here they are, for example, uh, ukrainian drones are flying into the territory. in fact, central russia is not opposed by anyone there. it turns out that various kinds of sabotage at practically unguarded military airfields. part of the political elite, wait a minute, this is such part of the political elite is sabotaging the fact that drones expose no e when the minister is laxity, but not only laxity remembered events, for example, the first world war, how

strong was the moment of betrayal of the internal betrayal of the political elite in relation to the same nicholas ii. after all, they removed him, part of the generals spoke out against nicholas ii and at home there were only military generals who were in positions there, like brusilov did heroic things. and there were others who also stole supplies and did not give the opportunity to the supply troops to bring all the necessary keys about the adviser. yes, you said who are there, and how could they not believe the west, if part of their assets was precisely their children and wives. here is the problem, they trusted, yes, the problem that putin raised raised this issue too. he also said, even during his munich speech, famous later. he spoke about the fact that comrades oligarchs capitalists transfer capital back, because you will have no other way, then we

collided. why did some do. and those who remained, then left their assets in the west, faced with their freezing. everyone else all left their assets back. it is said out of 300 frozen russian billions 200 are already there really in the russian federation. i just would like to remind not only about putin yes, but remember how mikhail and shustin, the prime minister. here he spoke back, uh, in parliament, and that means with a heart a statement that it's time to share. stop being greedy. it was an appeal specifically to the oligarchs. that is, today russia is really rebuilding itself. i think these military events, which forced me to. think about the need for internal reform, they will push for this change. here it is in its current state. russia of course it will be difficult to win this one. well, let's just say a special military operation, so it really provides for already talking about the mobilization economy. yes, already they say, completely different approaches. let's say in investing the economy. i

can just remember the recent times when in the highest russian offices they generally say, and what is economic policy, this can not be. tell me what it is hmm and today they are already talking about economic policy. that is, what we actually have been doing in the republic of belarus for a long time. yes, at the end of the lead. yes, let's put it this way, e v- the high role of the state in managing economic processes. today. this is beginning to develop both in the russian federation and in in this sense, we are moving in the same direction. well , we are already talking about the investigation about particulars, of course, the viewer needs to understand that you need to look at the root in the basis of the basis is , if earlier, of course, it was hushed up. and that this is not the one that recently, against the backdrop of the hysteria caused by a special military operation , high-ranking western politicians do not hide that we are talking about a global confrontation about an attempt to destroy the russian federation china then they say that you remember these statements that russia you have too much wealth for such a small population. it's not fair. uh,

something needs to be done about this, this country needs to be crushed. they just don't hide it. you can impose any reforms on us, people can each of us have their own opinion to be in some kind of pro-western, uh, ideals. yes, and uh, maybe there are people who want the west to come here, but you need to understand that it will all be through tough blood through tough blood. this and examples of this oil. it's good that today is not the most exposed today it became clear what is actually happening and what threatens it, and even take it in the sixth situation. look at all the breakdowns, yes, that took place there over the past two decades, uh, both in northern africa and in the post-soviet space, they started from one tipi moment weaned the population and the authorities think independently, they broke their brains, and then these people, where they went on occasion to about twitter. we have a telegram and so on. and now the lack of one's own critical thinking and trust in some voice from above played a cruel joke on everyone.

they used to do this with us with ukraine with moldova , uh. they are now doing it by their own citizens. here again, another package of sanctions on ntv ren tv russia channel 1 will still be belarusian tv channels are banned, this is all here, in fact, there are three points . that’s what he’s talking about, uh, dmitry aleksandrovich, i still think twitter didn’t play here, listen, well, in belarus why did our political regimes stand firm in belarus, unlike north africa, in general, it’s even relatively impossible. what is a regime, benaliv tunisia, you understand through and through corrupt all corrupt regimes collapsed. lipetsk tunisian, uh, ukrainian yanukovych gaddafi, who was really the leader of the nations when he began to engage in, let's just say all sorts of nonsense, these trips in tents of these interchangeable suits and so on. he began to lose trust of the people one of the main reasons that we arranged, they always

say how it happened with lukashenka, because the essence of the regime, the other is still the people's power and there is no such degree of corruption as there is, we have a fight against corruption. actually next moment. well, we did the right thing when we flogged the west, but there is another trend there. they understand that it is hard for them to live without russia. a statement that was recently made that germany went too far with sanctions about this, says france, says an open statement that one of the sources of the german economic miracle is cheap russian energy resources. dagestan mayer says this is access to the russian market. they see in fact the confrontation with russia is not in the national interests of germany france, so that their politicians do not declare, we can talk about the degree of their sovereignty and uh, these are the positive trends that exist in that society, we should by no means uh, mount them and not notice them, as on the other hand. you are now proposing us to get hooked on the next windings. i urge you to look

at the realism of the information. no, we can convince ourselves of anything, but europe cannot exist without us, and we are still european europe, any europe we have to the west of brest and grodno is not the atlantic ocean. we like it or not? and we sooner or later with these countries. we'll have to recover it happened many times i said, you know what pleases that despite the information blockade back in the west, despite the fact that our all, uh, radio stations have been removed from uh, broadcasting is hard to reach even on the internet. you know what's there and cases, for example, bulgaria tell me what, uh? in english we make our project on youtube it is included it is not loaded under any circumstances are not loaded. i just now printed out. i don’t even know who said it, it’s just written by fox news zelensky built a terrible ukraine at the expense of the united states against his background. putin will soon look like a sweetheart zelensky banned

media criticism of the government music by russian artists is the democracy that the united states supports this great crime listening to russian music and voting for the opposition party is impossible. after all, everything is not banned, and now in ukrainian churches they are organizing raids of lighting workers. uh, behind bars zelensky has nothing to do with democracy. he a car thief, having built a terrible state for billions from the united states, putin will seem like a sweetheart to you, yes, but it’s clear that such things are heard very often in the european parliament. there is such a magnificent deputy of ireland with very bright statements. this week, our journalists, among other things, analyzed and from the same series, when a person speaking explains to them that the most important thing is that we wanted to give money for what under democracy? yes , what is happening now in ukraine is stealing all state assets, it is not known what is happening on the market labor is going on the war actually supports its own things with this ukrainian state

, you understand, if they did not create sabotage detachments, uh, to attack belarus, which were bandits and did not participate in kierataks on yes no eight ukrainians, if they like to experiment on themselves, and not 30 years vote for clowns, and almost every president is a clown. it wasn't their problem for us. here they are now. dug between us and thank god let them dig. just let them get away from us, you know? to unfortunately, this is also wrong logic, because it is wrong. i now understand the lord's inner opposition now. here we see we got to the holy one, that is, they banned it in the literal sense. my first orthodox church was banned. you know that they kill uh people who don’t agree, it’s just that the situation is what kind of policy, the west has always been aimed at tearing russia apart to bet on this ethnic nationalism, which, as we

can see, they have successfully demonstrated ukraine problem in that they are indeed supported now. the west built a fascist nazi absolutely totalitarian regime there, practically banning any other point of view, destroying it, and not just. uh, some external symbols. yes, we are talking about changes in the absolute consciousness of historical memory. uh, this is an absolutely wild attitude to history with an attempt to completely delete any elements in the presence of russia in the history of ukraine, renaming monuments with a word, changing names, and all this here bacchanalia. which unfolded with an attempt to ban, including, uh, the orthodox church, native to these lands, this is one moment, yes, but we see now that a practically sanitary cordon has been built, only belarus does not fit with it and now the west is a thorn in the eye of the west this is a dream that they have been trying to

do since the times of the first world war, what comrade napoleon also tried to build here , to do something here, the duchy of warsaw, but supports the polish national hat against russia just needs to finally understand? unfortunately, yes, that's the question. what to do? alexey , can and can i finish this? yes? that is, the question is now we see that they are deceiving, when russia began to win. uh, some things have also started right now, for example, offensives have begun. immediately began to mount some new elements. there, let's gently pass the wire. and you will leave kherson or something there, like an exchange. yes , the exchange of buds met a football player. these are all elements of the game. that is, it must be understood that the final amount should still be the victory of either one or the other side, and in this case, both russia and belarus, as an ally of russia, should very clearly understand that, unfortunately, we

have to go to the end here, belarus is our element. eh, as if the border covers. we are now defending ourselves with our breasts , and from the increasing nato power in poland, in the baltics, we are now standing against these southern borders of ours, where the former brothers are ukrainians. today, there are always some provocations. russia certainly as a more powerful element, as a more powerful state. she must carry out this special operation and carry out, uh, expect that this special operation must end in a final rout. let's call a spade a spade. come on, the current ukrainian. let me say what i wanted to say. look here. today we use the term sanitary, cordon, i categorically disagree with it at the moment today. this should be called a barrier to an attack on russia, a bridgehead, a barrier to repay and in this bridgehead there is a gap in the form of belarus

's map. yes and this is the most national interest. after all, they imposed this concept on us with this cordon sanitary, and it levels. and if we understand that this is really a free class for attacking the territory of ukraine and the territory of belarus, the baltic states are already there, finland is also already there, then you begin to look at this geopolitical history of power in a completely different way. and now i want to say, the peace belt is a springboard for an attack. they stepped over to active actions, catching the moment, well, roughly speaking, of course, only we have built a serious union yes, with russia, yes, how did they begin to develop a union state. when they created eos now, by the way, it goes, yes, the corresponding advice above, then at the same moment, back in 2011, mrs. hillary clinton wrote. this is the savitization of the restoration of the soviet union, we do not do this in any form, our unification is our rise. we are competitors for them and they are catching the last moment

about yes, about the eu summit, let's hear yes, the states have spoken about how they work. uh, against whom the sanctions work, uh, packages in a package, uh, which they introduce uh against belarus russia that the primitive collective west stamping of thoughtless package economic sanctions against belarus russia begins to subside everything that could be banned and limited. even if our partners have already made themselves in time. now it's time for them to realize and evaluate the consequences. words about energy food crises are already heard from all three. you don't have to be a seer to guess soon individual countries. to these two crises, a third political symptom may be added.

internal critical assessments, primarily from the population and business in a number of western countries, are being heard more and more loudly. the statement about an almost economic collapse in our countries was reconciled by sober judgments by observers of analysts of individual politicians that the sanctions hit the initiators themselves much more. this is what we were talking about, you accused me of loving germany here, in fact, well, that's right we do, what we repeat how bad they are, the west is bad there, we smell good bad. we are good ukraine is doing bad things there. it's all right. this is all the right question. what should we do? and the president says that we must, firstly, sensibly analyze the processes that are taking place in the west, everything is not so simple there, yes, marginalized people who give an adequate assessment, like the thai deputies or someone else, but we have them we see what

electoral processes are going on. one should not expect from western politicians that he will win, as italians in the elections. immediately come out of all sanctions. listen, both have come out of some kind of sanctions, but he is pursuing a nationally oriented policy and his zelensky regime considers nothing to be an enemy, but simply an enemy directly. look how many times the president said, wait, there will be another electoral campaign in poland next year, and now the chauvinistic hysteria into which the ruling party in poland falls, it is precisely this that is caused. we must develop our own strategy, what we must do, why we constantly follow the same a special military operation is asked. what does victory mean to you? what does defeat mean to you? where the same russian army should stop is this is not an idle question, this is not an idle question, and the next moment, what should we do? with the same poles, what should we do? with the same add the balts, and from here an important topic arises. here we

somehow forgot about the president said. no peaceful settlement in ukraine is possible without the participation of belarus, and i will say more, it is impossible without the majority of european countries, because a peaceful settlement of the ukrainian conflict would mean the launch of that process, helsinki 2, about which the late minister spoke. makei us then no one heard, after all, when the process of helsinki 2 was launched, by the way, the soviet socialist countries were the soviet union with lists. by countries, when the threat of mutual destruction arose, when i beg your pardon, the helsinki process in the mid-sixties at the moscow meeting this idea was expressed, when it became clear what had risen in this confrontation of the cold war to a standstill, but why did the west make concessions? well, to kick in the face in vietnam, they were at the stage of decline, while they feel strength, while they believe that russia can be defeated, when they believe that due to this defeat, they will be able to destroy us, uh,

they will destroy us impose their uh , politics. we are in this situation right now. why such impudence? why is this dropping masks, because they believe that they will not get anything for it. they are discussing completely different issues, but precisely in economics. after all, paradoxically, everyone expected that russia would be strong on the battlefield and fail on the economy and political control of society. everything happened exactly the opposite. unfortunately the military result is not so good. as we would like, and their economy and political sphere is working perfectly. by the way, they asked what to do? yes, we've just seen a piece. yes, i want to ask you smart people, you see, social science is strong than we create a structure. and you speakers answer, you are some problem. today he is there is also with those people with whom we go further. that's all. there is brix and how will the soil be already there? you say a proposal, by the way, to hold

together by ourselves. yes, poland, the baltic states. well, what do we have to adapt to them, there are huge parts of the world, yes, which vision and here in one i remembered helsinki alone. yes, that means why europe didn’t go, and europe might go now, because then the united states of america went to rapprochement with their boss. here they brought in, brother, he would have resisted if the boss had not been thrown off. you know when richard nixon went to meet brezhnev so the detente began. as soon as they left. they threw him off and that was it. today it would be necessary to make the port still was for some time not immediately. it's so boring if today the united from america were at least somehow amassed on iota are set to compromise on dialogue. everything would be different, i can assure you, of course, that's why you and i must wait, if we don't want to do anything about the crisis in the united states of america, if we have the opportunity, we need to help this crisis. here we are shy all the time to influence. we say all the time let's deal with those who have been elected. by the way, in ukraine, one of the mistakes, so to speak, of russian foreign policy has been

said all the time, we will deal with those. whom do you elect, but they played it out, they say that russia interferes in all elections, they say, for example, there are negotiations between the wound connected with this america, that is, they want to pull iran, what the americans say in a direct not on the sidelines and practical direct. we will stop supporting the opposition, go get loose. that is, say directly that we influence. they also said the same. how much our president has openly stated since the beginning. somewhere in the salon, which everyone has already forgotten, there was such a general secretary. nato is the only, yes, the only requirements for us. move away from russia a. the only thing is that the thought about where we can influence belarus can influence independently both in poland and lithuania if we are a diaspora, i will not name now, yes, perhaps, the levers of the diaspora. today they are more likely to work against us, yes, there are other options to go. remember it's famous proposals to create belarusian maps and so on, that is, to create problems for our opponents for our

opponents, so that we are not all the time white and fluffy boletus. he spoke from the same place, about the same, as if a dream. so one direction is correct, the post on the telegram channel 12:30. so you say, we should just be able to fight them , so everything is written here, the dollar is everything, yes, this is what is being discussed there, let's finally move on to interaction. how much is it discussed? yes? well , in any case, these are also not yet sources on this one. it was new to me that the euro that's right, yes, because well, one can wonder how the united states of america is 300 there er years to this state in relation to iran china is a nation with thousands of years of history, and they history does not dictate their rules to them , as it seems to me, well, of course, on the military force. it is still e based, but the currency is the currency. yes, it seems to me, one of the main

regiments on which they stand, the united states why are they trying to knock out this pillar, and i may be wrong mikhailovich you are absolutely dollars. well, look here. eh, here's what to do? yes. and of course, it is very difficult to determine what to do? well, what needs to be done in order for some decision of the president to be spoken about by the security forces. and i think that this should be extrapolated to all areas of the lessons and once again learn the lessons. from what we see around us, the world is changing very quickly. you ca n’t ignore these changes, you can’t miss them, and these are the lessons that the military should learn from the operation in ukraine, economists from the development of the current development of the economy of belarus. she didn't get any worse. actually. although there are problems, but they are not critical, they save. yes, yes, the same thing, we should do the same in the field of humanitarian and ideological colleagues, just uh, in connection with this, what should we do? we really, as vadim says, are doing, but not

anyhow, that something needs to be done. this must be done purposefully, firstly, we already have a strategy for the development of allied relations in the former post-soviet space, which has been implemented both in the form of a union state of belarus, russia and in the form of that very eurasian economic union, the question is now, literally now, these minutes that are being raised and which have already been voiced by our president about what is needed. of the eurasian union and the parallel existing regional structures of the brix e highway, in this case we must understand that both america and europe , but first of all, of course, the united states will make every effort to ensure that this internal unity and the rapprochement of these structures and within these structures of interaction between states destroy, but we need to understand and convey this position to all participants that for us these structures are life-forming, that is,

today's regionalization, which has replaced globalization. it will just be a tool. here is one frenchie. he says that the americans themselves destroyed their own instrument of the world trade organization. yes taking froze. yes, but they don't. they are the, uh, document that you said, allegedly under the guise of fighting for the environment to introduce various kinds, e preferences for their own industry, which the territory of america has already worked, no one remembers especially this organization; the question is , we are now working on specific strategies. here we are the first to have a competitive advantage over the west today, the same resources that have already been mentioned here many times. for the most part, they are located on the territory of russia, the territory of kazakhstan, belarus, in this case, acts more like a territory where all this is processed, where there are certain

scientific developments, technological developments , we join forces, and all this turns into an element of influence. yes, that's cheap energy today. let's be cheaper than in europe today said, it created a competitive advantage for us. our task was to create a common e, yes, yes, within the framework of eggs until 2025. earn money without the west, and that's all, and the question is with the swift, which they constantly scared russia, they scared, in the end they cut it off today. the question is what undermines the very notorious dollar, what has already brought down the euro in many ways. and these processes you just need to move on and understand that they are our salvation, so to speak. you know, i seem to have that point of view with her, perhaps. eh, you can disagree, but it seems to me

that the west is nowhere without us without them. we will still come to cooperation sooner or later, but it seems to me, no matter how paradoxical it sounds, the more the gap will occur now. uh, the more sovereign the economy and political system we build, the easier it will be for us then, together with the west , to exist on equal terms. they just need take away the levers that they are ours and in the future, and we will be theirs. it will be, and perhaps even friendship, when they realize that they can not influence us in any way, the old soviet times say, yes, servility to the west. we have some idea of ​​the west as and we don't have a supermachine there, but a divine entity that has all the rights of a joke president. yes , look, there is such a topic, i can’t touch it in france alone here, again ukrainians are sitting on belarus ukraine the next sentence is ukrainians

point e, v. the principle says it all. uh, ukrainians the supreme court of ukraine decided that the symbols of the ss division galina are not nazi. we have a photo. eh, so you understand, right? this is the current heroes of ukraine standing on the right, and on the left - you will recognize this, this is heinrich himbler. yes, yes, accompanied by german officers, he is promising the fourteenth grenade. the ss division size is lit. yes, something notorious nazi killers. we have some material. let's see what they are in general, who are not like that, what he does. let's let's see the formation of the division with a glichin , fighters of the punitive units of the auxiliary police, involved in the massacres of civilians, some of the officers of the division were from the local population, starting from 1941. they managed to make a career in punitive police formations and with their

zeal earned the trust of the german command in early 1944, a division of the division a. also , separate ss regiments were used only in punitive operations against the civilian population of poland, france, yugoslavia and western ukraine killing civilians arson, villages. the executions of the communists, the destruction of the partisans, all this was an everyday activity. to them for the ss soldier on february 28 , the fighters of the fourth separate ss regiment, together with units of the upa and the auxiliary police, completely burned the predominantly polish village of gutapenets and destroyed almost all of its population of more than 1,000 inhabitants. about 50 people were able to escape such episodes on the account of the ss division goliszczyna there were many polish researchers. it is also claimed that volunteers from the ss division

galicia participated in the guard service in the pustkov concentration camp, where more than 750,000 people were killed during their stay in slovakia in the subordination of the division for some time was known for its war crimes. ss brigade dir. the levanger unit of the division, together with this brigade , participated in a number of operations against the slovak partisans. and the local population supporting them resulted in, as stated in the memoirs of the chief of staff of the division, unfortunate incidents against the civilian population. well, what state such heroes? right now, by the way, ukraine also has a lot of unfortunate civilian incidents. here's one thing. in connection with those who stumbled, they looked to remind our viewers that hitler came to power. in 1932, 1933, 33, which means that in 1945 we had already had this terrible regime for 13 years. and in

ukraine, this regime of one form or another, gaining strength, has been in existence for 30 years, so we must understand the depth of that lost ukrainian people, about which we spoke ukrainians have already grown generation. let's be careful with analogies. well, did we have a bunch of this hitler for kravchuk or something? uh, when wait, kuchma came really produced, but then again, when we talk about this decision. this is the same decision of the supreme court in response to the is-, maybe not at all. wait, we’ll finish the search for deputy maxim buzhansky, the servant of the people, he is a jew by nationality, he is from dnepropetrovsk and he considered that it was an insult to him that the symbol of the 14th ss division was naked. heads up. uh, as if freely distributed and the supreme court to him refused. that is, you imagine here is the logic, where they claim that they are not a nazi state, while ss symbols. ass is condemned. all of them detachments were condemned to the nyurvezh tribunes, it doesn't matter. algi. mine is &

cope. uh, wafa, nss that is, and its symbolism is not prohibited. this is a complete paradox , the presence of another law. yes, the nazis symbolized, well, the detachments of iroshenko, yatsenyuk are hidden. yes, in the camps , some kind of there in the forests were created precisely under kuchma, this movement. yes, they created the conditions for this, but a bunch. kuchma the most. what do you think? no , more than that, no, he could suggest. it seems to me that we do not need to go into such some kind of propaganda, rush and all. why should we give, right? how does he call to kill russians? yes, yes, this is the degradation of evolution under the monkey man. yes, this is a degradation, this is his movement, which means that there was something else in him then, when he was even the secretary of the port committee, and i dare you, the question to the

soviet power assured you. why did such people come forward? we spoke to yakovlev, we can also ask a question in ukraine about ukraine then you need to understand that since the collapse of the soviet union within the ukrainian political system. the same many party leaders. eh, some sympathized for many 30 years lived in ukraine, i can say these nationalist sentiments. there were even before that, that is, the vegetative communist party of ukraine shelest, to whom it was precisely for this that they were deposed for what , for the fact that he moved from lvov yes , let's say zapadnensky residents. typhoid gave them, novice positions, when they noticed this they put shcherbitsky nationalists. yes, the policy of shelest should have been carried out with a fence, enclosed in a concentration camp , these were soviet wars. i've arrived let's

look at today's lions. there were the same soviet citizens as citizens today on the composition of the bureaucracy in kiev. here they are all immigrants from western ukraine, even look at the tv phonetically what they say, this is not the ukrainian language . why then did they take the land that they could not re-educate in the soviet spirit. what is the question, because to state the facts, we can endlessly we you have to look at their reason for the reason, you ukrainian nationalism again, which has been brought up since the time of the first world war within the framework of the austro-hungarian empire, which was supported by special germans, and which was initially directed against russian shevchenko was on the sheet. he was the direction the austrian general staff had brought up. well, we rob shevchenko, there is still a lot of what you can do, we understand everything. we had

stereotyped thinking. i will never go to the result understand your position on the issue. you they themselves wrote a wonderful article. here , dmitry alexandrovich, regarding the ukrainian ss division, you just set out to us the process did not compare a bunch of brains. you did it, mr. for example, i see a problem here, what is really, firstly, those comrades who served in the galicia division for the most part, then they ended up in the west, and their children returned in the nineties govans for recruiting around the seventh then, when in the nineties there was a disintegration, that is, they returned. yes, and not us, they returned these people to ukraine and took up or directed knowledge, in general, all ideologies. this is the first second about fascism. ukraine and

its nationalization turning into a nationalist fascist state. uh, all these elements are certainly gradual advancement, that is, ukraine is a very complex construct. ukraine is a country that was created artificially in many ways in the 20th century and was formed from a multidirectional population with different vectors in its aspiration, and taras shevchenko is not only taras shevchenko ukrainian or nationalists. by whom it was grown is and these territories are included donbass, which were given to ukraine, began to be ukrainized against their will. in their opinion, there is crimea, which, in general, ukraine, neither in a dream nor in spirit, did not know what it would become and suddenly turned, and then had to run away from there, but this is something that was created purposefully, because it’s not 2014. eh, this is the start of it all. i remember the nineties when i came to me. drove

very unpleasant. yes, in kiev for example, i saw, uh, the publication of all these former ukrainian ss men, uh, who were freely sold and it was presented as uh uh problem solving. there is coverage of the white spots of history, then, when all these maidans were held in orange. this is the same ideology that has come off, that is, on the one hand. it's all seen. why russia for example? yes, speaking people have their problems. yes, there are prejudices, if you work for bad things, it is specifically targeted that we don’t have such problems there, as much as we have in the 20th year of our president’s power. we, too, could have been detained in the twentieth year. how many swastikas found these people were girls what was in ukraine for a long time to fight too. but, unfortunately,

we have been spending too much time lately on this unfortunate country. but what are we to do? well, this is primarily in order to, well, prevent the mistakes that they made, because yes they are, by the way, all the prerequisites for this were a remake of this, but i just need to make people think and understand, uh, once again we are great that, for example, belarusian collaborationist symbols. we have recognized nazi this white-red-white flag is prohibited at the legislative level today. that 's right, because if you do it, then how to return petliura's flags to ukraine. uh, with the ss division its symbols, allegedly not with the ss not nazi, then we will come to this all, yes, in this case, we must understand today that tightening, for example, legislation in belarus regarding the use of this symbolism is quite a normal step and in this case is one of the attempts to protect ours. that's how times of consciousness. let's move on to another good

news. yes, except for the ban, yes, the daughter was banned in the baltic states, we know. well, the news that blew up the media space, probably, of russia and the baltic states and belarus yes, and of ukraine, the daughter, who for many years broadcast on the territory of russia, severely criticized the russian authorities, worked on e on the territory of belarus in the twentieth year, you hear, i climbed into the archive and looked at them headlines in the twentieth year in shock. what, what they did, they admitted that they had that period the audience was number one they bluntly about it to say the protests in belarus money, the second first dead sweep crying, ideas and fireworks in response to grenades. but i can understand, uh, what's wrong with whet gas grenades. everything is noise. you come to the police officers for an illegal protest. and what did people with fireworks do to the world, what were they preparing for? start the victory, you would

remember that e fireworks then turned into a weapon against law enforcement officers banned. why do latvia and lithuania ban e russians in general now in lithuania they have developed such a questionnaire, in which it will be necessary to answer the questions, whose there, crimea will support support, yes at the entrance, why and this is very akin? why do they say that the russians are the jews of the 21st century in terms of the degree of persecution for those for the culture of cancellation, which e. here, for example, the nazis uh, deciding on the final solution of the jewish question. they thought for a long time how they should deal with the jews. and so they argued that they might be useful. jews. which ones? well, they have some unique knowledge. e, there they own some kind of craft, as if with them, and give them the right to live or not give them the right to live , give them the right to be on the territory of the third reich or not give them in the end. they came to the conclusion that they would destroy them anyway. all the same, the same thing happened with respect to the slavs.

the general cavity, which our fugitives deny had the same decision, that is. uh, because there are many of us. we must first disorganize, deprive statehood, then, as they wrote, evict beyond the urals in concentration and at this stage. yes destroy 75% actually subject to destruction. here it is also about them they segregate russians into those with whom they can temporarily go, who are their fellow travelers, whom they will deal with anyway, because they do not want to have rain on their territory. and you know why, among other things, it means that they are fighting, in principle, with the russian language at home, and it is gaining popularity among them. there, his russians do not speak russian, everyone who speaks. and then they know that, well, can i return to this issue in one frantsevich, i looked at him a truly global perspective. they argued, but i want to pay attention to two points, but there were two pieces of information. one of them i don't know as a man, whether you watched or not, but it was about a 3 minute video. where uh? head

of rain? just crying, she had a tantrum and using such a russian mat she spoke, that's what she said. so what have we been fighting for all this time. hmm. it was the first. and the second thing that didn’t surprise me, so to speak, was the statement of the editor-in-chief of the rain, who who was not allowed to attend the meeting, where this psychological confessed, let's listen to read. when i laughed at him most of all, this naive young man. all this time i thought that freedom of the press exists in the west, but we've been talking about it for a decade, you fool. they need you on the territory of russia on the territory. west, you with your free word more flowed to hell and you will do what you are told. let's hear in the books that in the west there is competition between the parties. i have read that the accused party has the right to bring their arguments in response to the accusation. did the rain channel have such an opportunity today? no, she

was not at the 30 minute meeting of the council on electronic media representatives of the rain were not invited at the end of the thirty-minute meeting , a 14-page solution appeared with the shorthand skills of respected members of the respected council of electronic media, one can only envy today's decision is undoubtedly an absurd fool. they also came to belarus for the elections. uh, bdica everything, yes, with the prepared conclusions of the soviet school was like that. we all passed the reading technique, remember, firstly, the second third grade. thank you, soviet school. yes, that's the number of words per minute. this is all good with him, but this phrase is really an adult who has worked in journalism for so many years. i've been reading all this time. they destroyed their state. they did not fight against they destroyed states. first they betrayed the state. yeah, and now they've had something like this, yeah. that it was not their people who came, they

poured mud on them, destroyed cars were taught. open our love, the textbook of political science is written somewhere, and today they have received democracy. sorry for the words on the faces. yes, i’ll already be a rag, too, a wet rag , and suddenly it turned out. so why don't we repeat this word all this time we fought. but on the other hand, they fought for nothing, you understand, therefore, but at the same time they managed to destroy and did so many nasty things, including the right mekhovich, he said, including so much dirt on belarusians, or that, you just understand, this is the most important thing for me in all this history, especially in this speech of a journalist, the most beautiful, simple and often example of the fate of a traitor. yes, here i am talking about this if you want, why do you call journalists propagandists a beautiful, but wrong word. yeah, western propagandists who worked for western money on the territory. yes, and those who poured mud on it

later, when they were kicked in the ass from there from russia, they ended up in the main territory of the west, so to speak, and here a little bit, not restraining themselves in expressions, making some reservations there, this comrade is generally leading. well it i wonder what he is, he meant about whose army. he spoke, maybe even about the ukrainian one, but they understood him exactly what he supports, allegedly they fought russia, dear leaders of the rain. i have a struggled answer. they're out of bounds . hmm, that's all. right. only one thing to understand, there are those who continue. there is also some jellyfish left, which is also in the fishing area. it was possible, i don’t know, they didn’t see anything that in europe and in the usa the media are closed, so that in relations it doesn’t touches, there are problems of the first russians. a woman with a poster who came back,

because they need nowhere. we need ours nowhere. you remember, uh, the story of two years ago alexandra orlov, editor-in-chief at the state television and radio broadcasting company, went to work in the prague office of radio liberty, remember his story. yes, it turned out that the quality of corporate culture is still tougher. she assumes. if you are lying, that you should not doubt what you are lying about , at first, for example, you answer a thousand of some questions, i was not just tested, but checked for loyalty on a lie detector. for this, they were specially taken to the embassy. there is literally a veteran in the american embassy through the radio, in my opinion, radio liberty is completely in the garbage heap of the notorious, it’s simply worse, no worse than radio liberty, first of all, yes, it fought. remember this e propaganda graphics. oh yes, i wrote under the photo. here, if anything, the president is on the left, the president is more fired on the left. it was

may of the fourteenth year, he was fired, headed. new york editor-in-chief abramson lived for the publication of materials in which he said that among the pro-russian militias. in ukraine, mostly local residents were fired on february 28. 2003 , american tv presenter phil donach was fired. i remember, he advocated bridges, he doubted the need for military action was fired in the ninety-first year during the first iraq war were in the desert known journalist john albert penetrated the is nbc. he penetrated the front line - behind the front line and managed to film what was happening in the eract cities, it turned out that the so-called smart bombs. remember such yes, not all smart women and children of old people die from them. he showed the direction of these people showed the ruins of his wife's houses. as a result, he was fired with a wolf ticket; a person could not get a job anywhere, and the rain, like our belarusians. ah, propagandists. all this time, uh, they were telling with their mouths about the fact that we are here, uh, oppressing everyone, you hear. everyone is the

same everywhere. well, i remember the broadcasts. uh, belarusian tv channels 1 different talk shows, where we had the opposition sitting, we were arguing at this table yes, hoarseness they swore, but everyone was given the floor on state television. for example, i have never been invited to give an interview for our niva for a new buy for tut.by. they are now boasting of themselves with these questions. i, as a state, gave a platform to everyone , they invited everyone to our broadcasts, they stopped inviting when we received, when we received confirmation that they were financed with the west , instructed and prepared for a coup d'état of the republic of belarus, which i repeatedly announced on the air, warned to stop, and i still remember. uh, bash yes was like that organization, they dismantled the iceman on the tower and agreed that this is a vice on nezalezhnosti, what type? maybe they warned you to stop, that

you went far beyond journalism. and in general, you understand everything. so another good news. in germany, the dictator scholz continues to severely repressive pressure on civil society in the study of thinkers, there appeared several dozen political prisoners at once, such a headline would be in deutsche, yes, if the events were in belarus, by the way, they would be in belarus were one to one. ah, what are you doing? imagine if we published such a version of the conspiracy. as you understand, prushinsky showed up some time there, or someone gathered this 17 vits there, and you said there, like they moved, yes, and there, in all seriousness. yes, well, you need to understand that there is a very strange european society there, reminded me. uh, the bi-2 lodge was like that or whatever the jellys are, uh, they do have parallel structures and aristocracy. she's pretty powerful question worth it for this case? in reality, some kind of structure,

maybe, and so the lips of some aristocracy, it was real. yes, yes, no, but here, maybe , too, because they have aristocrats who create such. the clubs, in fact, or look, we see that some pro-russian things are being sewn there. yes, but the russian surname was written that either these arrests are just a signal to everyone. why don’t you dare raise the issue of improving relations with russia, why did this coincide with the statement of officials about the dangers of sanctions, because german why in in germany, it is german business that he raises the question of what german citizens are suffering huge losses . many deputies raise this question. they see what our president was talking about, the growth of electoral sentiments against the policy in the east, which is being pursued, including germany, the americans call germany the weakest link in their coalition of germans, accused of not helping ukraine enough, and then and so on. etc. why is the kiev regime particularly rude to the germans. these are all liver sausages. threats denial

making pants. mayer, the americans are cracking down on the germans through kiev, and this is another e. tap here, in this struggle around germany, germany needs to be leveled, germany really in the normal operation of the economy, this is the european locomotive and potentially, if it gains sovereignty, it may be a competitor with the same distance against germany will be introduced for the arrest of these honest people, who even peaceful action, did not have time to hold and i want to say. there is a difference between the p2 lodge that existed in italy, the international yes, and the one which today was revealed to treat gzhel, warned of the arrest in advance, and for 2 hours he poured documents on the list in his office in the fireplace, and so on, and these were taken warm at night. this means that they were clearly connected with the italian authorities and another international code. and here it was dummy ordinary provocations. and it reminded me of everything. you know the arson of the restoration. here is the thirty-third year for hitler to come to power faster. he needed a reason to accuse himself of the communists. something else

now, the repressions will just go right be suppressed. excuse me, the situation in front of him, then this cross is shaking. yes, literally. it will not fly off made this decision. well, it definitely couldn't have done without a schulz. so, what is the difference from what was in belarus from the twentieth year? i can't understand, the writers are the same. in general, you see, they take the same scheme, they can’t even come up with something new, that’s all for this question. why, then, are the estimates different for both? what are the standards? look, we still punish the crime, eh there is a typical fascisation of europe. and where the first repressions began, we don’t take ukraine. the european union, the baltic states, just arrests of activists, those who don’t like the closing of the rain. now this is all pumping western europe, there is a wave of this fascisization. i would n't draw parallels with us here, for sure, because an absolutely far-fetched thing was rightly said here. let's see how it

will develop. here, the investigation and the purpose will come up, police provocations, an adequate part of society is called doing something from the point of view the most important thing that the german government did. she demonstrated to her citizens that closets and pockets would come to them at any time at night. and what did they gather there? and about the rain, too, a small point should be noted. they said, roughly speaking, those who previously kept them. so they showed everyone who is the fifth column in any country in our strategy of the year. that's what's up with you. that's who you really are, so they don't give a damn about this opposition. they don't count on it. well , the generals who met with us. do you remember now they are traveling around the country, holding a very interesting meeting. they told there is detailed information. i think that, uh, knowing the level of our intelligence services, transcripts, if not video with sound, how do they western curators meet with these

people who failed theaters there and others. well, is the question something tough or are you, uh, doing this or stinging him? where did the hysterical attempts to unleash a civil war here come from? there's just blackmail going on and everyone knows. but if, regarding germany, you still need to return to it, there you still need to understand, this is certainly an internal disassembly. uh, because when the first reports went about this conspiracy, look what happened. a single space, firstly, that some russian is involved there. uh, although everyone denies everything and the kremlin as always denied everything and then even the journalists themselves admitted that well, yes, they tried to turn to the romans, they did not receive support, nevertheless the word russian sounded. this horror horror story was voiced. uh, in the public space the second moment that sounded involved there also some kind of seventh water on jelly, an alternative for germany, that is, the positional party

that exists in germany today, which, uh, is still considered marginal, but which is nonetheless represented in parliament, which is allowed to say certain things unpleasant for the current political elite of germany that is in my opinion. there will also develop. this plots will dig under this party. uh, because uh, the electoral successes of schultz's party. they are in question. that is, on the one hand. there is also an internal of course, the background of the showdown, and we see that today, uh, the german leadership is already different, except for provocative- provocative things like that, they can’t increase their rating, yes, and perhaps a way to switch attention, because the rating is then scholtsev in connection with all these events, he falls, as he swallowed the nord stream. well , a person after merkel makes a very strange impression. that is how the

policy has changed. uh, and uh, the approaches of the leadership have changed so much in general, germany to its own uh, task interest goals. yes, it could still be the surprise of the unspoken consent of the scholts to the explosion, uh, but it didn’t happen. yes, it didn’t work out, they wouldn’t have done this to their closest ally, they definitely set her up many times so that the closest allies would bang, he didn’t want to turn on the gas. it was somehow to explain the protests in germany were growing. and now the pipe exploded, this became the germans. this is what high-ranking officials explained, but our law enforcement officers do not need anything. why are we showing a video there, where is a terrorist attack being prepared? yes audio recognition. why does he see the president of the federal criminal police office, says the group is dangerous because they follow irrational beliefs, weapons, ammunition, the investigator found at 50 sites, this shows that it is not without reason. well, indeed,

not a harmless action is the example of the minister of north north rhine westphalia. hendrik. wust also said he expects further citizen action against the reich well against these raids showed that the rule of law is defensive in nature. i mean, well, no big deal cops didn't, really didn't do their job. i'm just a question. what is different from what we are doing, but in the twentieth year is now the minister of the interior. can say that e sorry, but the rule of the belarusian law is defensive in nature, they are the highest race. well, a blooming garden frame from the film kin-dza-dza. yes, he says, now i'll take off my mask and write to you here, as if we are wearing masks yes , bars, by the way, said this week that the war must continue and there can be no peace. well, a very interesting phrase that the more ukraine will be destroyed, the more chances it has to join the eu that is, as i understand it,

they generally assume. so let it be better to destroy the open field. here are the resources for you. here are the rivers. here's a fox for you, come it at all, and then, when ukraine collapses, they will come to the cabinet barrels from this question here. and why don't they let us in, and there you will be here already a different person. he will say, go to boris and ask. yes, there have been more than once and they will simply throw ukraine at the next time about nazism. we used to say uh in italy uh raids against neo-nazis and what is not connected, with whom with ukraine with basic connections, the police announced a series of raids against her nazi organization , the hagal order, accused of possessing weapons of preparation for a terrorist attack in the group, established operational communications with the ukrainian battalion. azov five members of the italian non-normative organization were arrested on november 15, another member is wanted by the authorities. it turned out that he was fighting russian troops in ukraine along with a battalion. azov well, here you see from the messages. well, a nazi is about the fact that there is no nazism in e ukraine and the global network is actually global. that

is, this does not concern one country, but in principle, how many people of the nazi ideology of germany, fascism in italy is, in general, their invention. they offered it to the world. and they continue to use these models, blaming. at the same time, for some reason, all the time we are in the fact that we are bad and we are on the side of evil, that is, we must understand that this, firstly, is an ideology. she didn't go anywhere . she has been cultivated. and after the war and all these, uh, neo-nazi organizations, despite the fact that there germany for some time pretended to be fighting them. yes, but nevertheless, they staged marches at home even at the time of this here, uh, there, détente and flirting with the soviet union, they still staged marches, as long as these marches were peaceful, they didn’t turn into car overturning, arson, and so on, that is, the police did not touch. today. in

fact, we already have, uh, a branched movement. here are these right-wing nationalists, who, uh, in fact, uh, in different parts. are they still trying alexei after all, if they really wanted to defeat nazism in europe, then 30 years after the war, a generational change was not enough. the main thing in the course of the investigation is not to go out on yourself. a large, as it were, fascist translation throughout europe is not in vain, in fact, a contradiction is created there. yes, the emigrants are downgraded by the economic situation. here it is maturing. the same veermerian big republic, so that some new species will come. uh-huh folks, which must be given for the sake of a higher time. uh-huh so well, basically our time has almost come to uh the end of time our broadcast at the end. i looked here i still have a good quote. i found a macron, in general i like this uh, in which politicians are independent

uh in the sense that nothing practically depends on him anymore. e in europe e he gave a small lesson to the former belarusian overseas media . how to work, he reacted very sharply to the question of a journalist. perhaps their power outages in france this winter urged them to stop scaring people with absurd scenarios. what kind of questions do you ask quote these debates are absurd role of state authorities and organizations, not se. fear and not being controlled by this fear, their role is to do their job to provide people with electricity to stop it all - said the macron to ask. again, i'm projecting on where the electricity is, yes, which you should have. stop saying would yes question asking an uncomfortable question. thank you this was the editors bow. we'll see each other exactly one week later . eh, that's goodbye. all the best

, stay on the tv channel of belarus

tv channel belarus 24 broadcasts for you round day, do not switch our daily task to tell about belarus in the country and abroad , more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to viewing the projects of our tv channel. so what is it, belarus

generous picturesque and monumental sports and team we tell you not only about significant events, we introduce you to active, energetic and inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development, belarus can be different to understand and feel. she needs to be seen with her own eyes.

the hottest event in the world of sports for the number one game in the small gulf country built from the ground up by hard training and exciting competition. that is, it will be an easy uncompromising struggle, an interesting game and my career for my history it will be a great event if we can achieve this result the body is one-sided and already from the transition to such moral and volitional qualities there were joys in victories and defeats, that after all we were able to climb, strength appeared inside us to start all over again to try, a chic base of 16.4. yes, his manner of performing stability, they allow us to count on the highest place. watch in sports projects on belarus 24 tv channel. are you ready to test your knowledge in the

company of erudite scholars of our country? there is a legend that on the other side of the screen it seems that all questions are easy, come to us. i'm sure. you will change your mind each correct answer brings one of the teams to victory. karina america no. mexico mexico all 15 seconds. she was talking about mexico when i said i like everyone for a good answer, i accept mistakes are fraught with building a tower. what is the name of the pencil core quite so, let's talk, look at the intellectually entertaining project.

good evening on the air panorama in the studio of ekaterina tikhomirova, and stress first of all about the main events of this day, and they talk to themselves in bishkek.