in the markets, yabry does not refuse the adopted indicators and the implementation of projects all the volumes planned for the five-year period will be realized, the head of the eurasian development bank assured this, in general, on the eve of yabry, he summed up his work for the year and told where we will move on. the meeting took place in kazakhstan, our film crew also went to almaty to ask about belarus and how our cooperation will be built at a time when a serious struggle has unfolded for investments all over the world. the coming year is called unpredictable further decline in investment activity. here's to your point of view. what are the financial prospects for the new year? is the eurasian development bank cutting

funding to partner economies ? indicators that we have set for ourselves this year, and investments are made evenly in all countries, and the presence of the bank. we work with everyone borrowers. e, realizing the classical goals of a development bank, it is to support the market mechanisms of a market economy; support for sustainable development ; promote projects in the field of green finance. sustainable development, therefore, in these areas, the bank continues its work, we will not take long-term horizons. here in the coming years. how much is the bank ready to invest in the belarusian economy? here we have not changed our indicators on the strategy adopted. uh, all these hmm volumes that we have planned for a five-year

period we have u, will u, be implemented we work with borrowers from e belarus, primarily from the private sector. and we see that belarus is traditionally strong in its industry. with its digital agenda and therefore projects in the field of industrial cooperation for us are the most priority interests of belarus traditionally, but they are also present in russia and kazakhstan and kyrgyzstan implement next year. this is construction svetlogorsk central control commission, the amount of funding. there are about 180 million us dollars here, we really demand, we see that in russia in

kazakhstan the products of this plant will be. uh, very well received and, uh, in general. we look forward to the twenty-third year with confidence. e. we hope to continue to implement our strategy according to plan, but in general. what amounts are we talking about and what will be the priority projects. we have planned investments in belarus in the amount of about 1.5 billion. uh, us dollars we we hope that these volumes will be implemented, but uh, the pace of implementation of a and the number of projects depends on our interaction with potential borrowers. the fact is that 22 is not an easy year, but is associated with an increase in e rates in global financial markets. we have seen some deceleration of project activities. in the first. uh, semesters, uh, and related. uh, some

funding slowdown. e throughout the space and in the second half of the year. we, uh, have stepped up our pace somewhat. eh, well, let's see. just how it will be to develop conjuncture and, depending on this , to finance projects geopolitics is changing the current picture of the world. how does this affect the financial strategy of the bank on its priorities? does the eurasian development bank involve import substitution operations in industrial projects? for example , the bank's mission is to promote goals. uh, sustainable te, and we understand that here, uh, in any uh situation, there is a niche for our activities, it is present and moreover, it is probably expanding, so uh, here, uh, all uh projects, which meet the mission, goals and objectives of the bank will be implemented, including projects

aimed at import substitution, but again with conditions. in which we work, in order to attract funding according to the restrictions that are present, we must adjust our activities. this is all the information for today, good luck with your transactions and productivity in business. we are on the air every tuesday wednesday and thursday at the most visible in the economy. see you. the hottest sporting event for the number one game in the small gulf country

built everything from scratch hard training and exciting competition. that is, it will be an uncompromising struggle, an interesting game and my career for my story. it will be a great event if we can achieve this result . one-sided, already with such moral and volitional qualities , victory and defeat was glad for himself that, nevertheless, they were able to climb, forces appeared inside themselves to start all over again try, gorgeous base 16.4. yes, his manner of performing stability, they allow us to count on the highest place. watch in sports projects on belarus 24 tv channel.

hello viewer. my name is igor tura. this is my propaganda, let's start. if i made a rating of cities that i would not like to visit again, then the capital of kyrgyzstan, bishkek, would definitely be somewhere at the top. well, it’s true that we all only praise partners and allies, and just because it’s customary, looking ahead, it’s usually customary to say, they say but in kyrgyzstan, people are good, kind, sympathetic and hospitable, that's all in general. well , of course it is, but in general, the people there are different, as in belarus, as in russia, as in europe, in the usa, and

even as in australia as a whole, the kyrgyz, guys are wonderful, but here is one local traffic police officer with this staff of his and with a stone face, not allowing a diplomatic car with the flag of belarus and journalists on board the hotel to pass. when the ether burns, the impression is smeared strongly. so last week the journalists presidential pool visited bishkek, i was there for the second time, the city has become a little more beautiful over the past few years, i don’t argue, but in general it is such a regional center during the collapse of the ussr, and when you fly back to minsk from such cities, you begin to relate a little differently to the fact what is close at hand and what you just got used to wide avenues neat infrastructure so the cleanliness of the streets and everything else you know as a comic proposal to increase love for your homeland and awareness of its advantages. it would be nice to lead all belarusians through the countries of the ex-ussr so that everyone has the opportunity to compare how our country is and how

our country is wonderful in itself, but in comparison it is magnificent. the world is not only a resort, the zone of egypt and turkey, the world is not the tourist zones of france, italy and god forbid in germany, the world is not only the skyscrapers of new york, which is beautiful only from afar, when the homeless in the squares and the avenue are imperceptible, as well as weird soviet bloc. they are different, we had one common historical point and some countries, as we are in development ran others went the third remained in place. the fourth - this, too, however, began to back away. here, all opponents will be an argument about the baltic states. but there is a nuance of the baltic countries - these are three political escorts. escorts can also be male, of course, and this is even such a modern trend in general. but lithuania latvia estonia is strangely feminine. so those who were going to attack me on the topic of sexism. hang up for those who don't know. now it is customary to call escorts women who temporarily or permanently

passes under the financial support of rich men in return, providing them with services of a sexual nature. and don't show off before. such women were called prostitutes or words more sharply, but times have changed. and now the same thing, in fact, may have very different packaging. so here are the strange baltics, how the escorts switched to financial maintenance. of the west, yes, perhaps, the escorts were put in order, washed, combed, bought a new dress, perhaps, lips were pumped up in a fur coat and put next to an expensive car of an escort, of course, they publicly talk about how well done they are, how they have achieved everything. how life has become better, more beautiful, brighter. after all, before you had to fight for food with dogs, and today on the table, caviar is only the essence of all this from mapping, and in return, women lose the right to be women with a capital letter, and countries lose the opportunity to call themselves fully states, because if you are fully financially supported if you are obliged not to

show off to give the owner what he wants at any time in any place, whatever the you have a fur coat, and no matter what you are. or are you just a political prostitute, devoid of any sovereignty, and this is the purest truth, there is another path that the countries of the eurasian economic union have taken - independent development, of course, not as fast as signing an agreement on the sale of sovereignty, but sovereign, and this led us to the point, when western sanctions, with which we were, well, so much frightened by ineffective ones , not because the west has weakened, but because we have become stronger, alexander lukashenko spoke about this in friday at the summit phenomenon. there was almost an economic collapse, our countries were embarrassed by the opinions of observers of analysts of individual politicians that the sanctions hit the initiators themselves much more, while the eu, as well as its cis and other associations. there are lukashenka, you know

such managers as alexander grigorievich may be disliked by colleagues because people like shishenko constantly periodically look for shortcomings both in themselves and in those who are around voice them and urge everyone to become better sometimes when in the vertical there is such a person, then the movement upwards of this vertical is trying to block such a person, because they say, everything is fine with us here relatively calmly. we are in a warm office with a decent salary. and then he suddenly muddies the water with his own. let's fix this and this, but it's people like lukashenka, those who are not afraid to see the problem, voice the adoption , suggest a solution and persuade everyone else to take action to solve the problem. such people give us progress in which then we all use on the highest level, when it seems like the end of the year and it is customary to talk more about achievements, the speech of such a rational rebel looks approximately. this is how we continue to grapple with the

consequences of decisions. accepted unilaterally at the national level, we cannot export the forest. we do not allow international road carriers to pass there, while the search for mutually acceptable solutions to problematic issues drags on for many months of meetings, sometimes many decisions are not enough. why lukashenka is free publicly criticizes the unions, in which minsk is and is not included, and also sometimes criticizes the allies, packing it all in the form of councils. sometimes someone in russia is criticized, not putin and not all of russia, but precisely a separate force there, which importantly indicates the debatability of yerevan’s position , analytics hints at tashkent’s flaws , enters into polemics with nursultan and with astana, and so on. he can afford it, because in this profession he has been in the profession of president for a very long time, the essence of which is the preservation of sovereignty of their country. he is extremely successful in this and so successful

next to him. there are few professionals, if there are at all, and everyone around understands and accepts that lukashenka is a president of the highest level, because other presidents have come and gone, being replaced by green ones, green ones have matured and left, but he was not always for a long time and when, too, a mastodon, albeit smaller angela merkel allows herself a public story that the west needed the minsk agreements only in order to gain time and give kiev opportunity to prepare for war. that is, neither kiev nor germany and france were going to fulfill the agreement, and so lukashenka allows himself to answer. that's the way it is. i didn't expect that either. the president of russia said this, he did not expect such a conclusion, but the tanks of the world. she acted small. nasty, she wants to be trendy. here,

the main feature of modern western politics, the complete absence of a strategy and a core to please populism and the political situation, of course, mrs. merkel, is manifested. it’s just that now in the west the main theme is supposedly heroic support for ukraine, and therefore today the statement itself is being pulled on the globe of facts in 2015. europe and germany especially didn’t want a war in ukraine and really didn’t want to break relations with russia, because they then signed multibillion-dollar gas supply contracts with it , as they built gas pipelines for billions of dollars, and then merkel almost dragged poroshenko by the ear negotiate with putin and then poroshenko was accused at home of surrendering ukraine at the behest of berlin because then it was profitable germany and personally merkel but today that sound position will not cause the necessary reactions from the political bond of the american and european countries, which is almost

entirely american and merkel comes out and lies. i assure you, when russia successfully completes its. the same merkel will come out and say that, in fact, to be honest, berlin has been trying to rein in kiev for all the years, but they were either not controlled or controlled only by the united states and this is not one. merkal is such an asshole. this is the principle of western diplomacy in general. say now what is profitable, a as far as it is, the truth is not significant. there are just two problems that ordinary people believe in this blah blah show, and based on this lie they make a political choice that brings more and more liars and populists into politics, and the second we still thought that merkel was not like that, that it really is an iron lady who will not get dirty with populism, but merkel was mistaken about her is no different from, for example, aristovich. those negotiations in minsk were extremely important for the whole of europe and not only for ukraine and russia, and even not so minsk the agreements were strategically important for europe no

less than for ukraine, and the subsequent meeting of contact groups in minsk for several years confirmed this and all politicians. the west, including the same merkel , publicly emphasized that there were alternatives to the minsk agreements. no, just now populism, unfortunately, has become an alternative to logic and truth, merkel and poroshenko want to show their importance that the ukrainian army. look , one of the strongest armies in the world is fighting, because then we deceived everyone in minsk and the world the whole deceived and russia, and so on small and disgusting. at the same time, alexander grigoryevich probably has some kind of story in store from that meeting that compromises the lord merkel and emphasizes either her pettiness or deceit on lukashenka. go down to the level of the chancellor of germany and publish something, but if anything, they say, even the walls have ears it is possible that the

walls of the palace of independence in minsk also have the eyes of the norman four. in minsk, it has always been called a colossal success of our diplomacy. now this colossal success has grown many times over, and our success is that last week we removed the euro from our basket of currencies. there now the russian ruble is the chinese yuan, and still the us dollar is quite obvious that the kremlin and putin personally are bringing down the current economic system in the world, the basis of which is just a dirty green paper, as zhirinovsky said, if the dollar prevents the civilized world from living, then you need to to bring him down even in the toilet. if you have to, if lukashenka is already open. says the dollar is coming the end. he doesn't wishful thinking. he just can afford to speak out loud the purest truth. it is already clear to everyone that the era of donor domination is ending. the future belongs to trading blocks, calculations in which

national currencies and about the dollar will be made. lukashenka was asked by russian journalists following the results of the summit. whose desire to record an interview with the belarusian president it has already become a tradition to refuse the dollar. yes there is not, you do not refuse. we were forced, first of all, along this path, and when we were forced to say, well, nothing, we are satisfied with the russian ruble, that, in fact, for many years and a very long time, alexander grigoryevich called on both moscow and other allies to abandon the dollar in mutual settlements and switch to the national currency, for example, there are no problems with the russian ruble, but the calls of the belarusian leader did not meet due reactions, because the kremlin has a lot of towers and some towers were more comfortable and better at working with the dollar. so that's from the wording of the moscow colleague. we are abandoning the dollar. my own eye twitched a little, as well as from another question of these insane

european prices, the current prices for russian citizenship are satisfactory. let me translate this question, essentially. does it sound like you are satisfied that belarus is selling gas not at market prices, but at special contract prices with a clear push to the side. let minsk publicly say that thanks to moscow there are no problems at all. thanks sincerely to both fraternal peoples, it is worth thanking each other more often for help. although both peoples help, not in order to hear public gratitude, but because that we are really brothers. isn't it so, but if you return to a strictly economics, minsk never asked for a low price for gas minsk asked for equal fair conditions and a low price for gas is not the reason. this is a consequence. if you get 60 or 80 dollars, and we get 120 dollars at the border, for example.