and companies now they will lose access to equipment and components of american origin under the sanctions hit, the largest manufacturer of memory chips in the us, ymtc. as bloomberg notes, this decision by the joe biden administration indicates an escalation of the sino-american conflict. in technology, back in october, the us department of commerce imposed a restriction on 28 chinese technology companies, they were then given 60 days to prove that their activities do not threaten us national security now and completely blacklisted. by this time, all the information about the events in the country and the world will be continued by my colleagues at 3:00 in the afternoon. i say goodbye to this, see you at the first button. a special edition of the saas program is authorized

to announce from the heart of the european union from brussels i want to note that for the first time in the history of belarusian television. we are hosting the program from the european parliament press center studio and a few steps from me is the voting room, where key decisions are made for the entire european union. i am pleased to announce that already now there are deputies of the european parliament with me in the studio, each of whom represents their country, it is with them that we will talk about the results of this difficult year for the entire european union as a whole and about a possible dialogue between states. i am very happy to welcome all of you to our studio and first. i want to introduce our dear guests, dr. maxim

punishment, they have made so many mistakes

, they have gone so far from reality that they will not meet further from it. they sit in their towers and ivory and see nothing doctor. and if your country's politicians deserve a gift from santa claus, i don't know if they deserve a gift, but they will get it anyway, like everyone else at christmas. so it's a funny question, but i'm asking this question because many europeans ask themselves. how did it happen that the european union, the main victim of the war between the west and russia the politicians in the european union make

decisions based on what they consider to be morally right, because of this they are ready to sacrifice the economies of their countries for the sake of in order to look good and feel moral superiority over others, it is obvious to them that ukraine is the victim and the big russia next door is aggressor on the territory of another country. they believe that it is necessary to resist this sign of solidarity of the victim, even if you have to pay a certain price for this, but the prices, of course, are paid by the eu leadership, unless the meeting says a bright light, the sooner this time falls on the shoulders of enterprises and employees of pensioners and all those who are now suffering from inflation, and the politician's idea is that now they can say we will support ukraine to pay for this. e for our support. and i don't have you, tatyana pants. and do you think this opinion is

supported by all europeans or in society, after all, there is a split in the ussr, we observe a civil war in europe. the continent itself is the leadership of some people, including politics. you don't even see the presidents yet. well, really they are. that's what i think world war ii is. still going on and now many are driven by the desire for revenge. this is especially evident in my country and other eastern european countries who worked closely with the nazis during world war ii. today, these countries want to avenge their defeat; western politicians will soon see this too, but for now they are doing nothing. that they say that the territorial integrity of ukraine the integrity of the soviet union

is guaranteed by agreements that the territorial unity of the federal state was violated and now i'm talking not only in the soviet union but also the collapse of the yugoslavs, the former subjects, now exists as an independent state. at the same time, i'm not talking about the right to self-determination enshrined in the un charter - it's a completely different matter. i totally agree with you. it so happened that the sanctions, which, according to western leaders, were primarily to destroy the russian economy. as a result, the european union was hit so hard . who do you think made a mistake? the authorities

of the european union have made many mistakes snowfall. it's still too early to say for sure. who is the winner. who losers? personally, i still clearly see two winners and two losers, the first winners are , of course, nato and the usa now the united states is once again firmly on its feet, the second, victorious ukrainian nationalism 10 years ago. i myself came to ukraine and then i would not have been able to say exactly what the ukrainian nation is. today lived ukrainians received a gift from russia they have a single enemy, according to karma, when you have a single enemy it leads to political cohesion. namely, this is what we are seeing today in

ukraine, a nation is being born before our eyes, as for the losers, the first of them can be called the european union and for the reverse effect of sanctions, which manifests itself in the energy food crisis of inflation and so on, the second, the losing side is developing, strange, about, which we often forget, if it is difficult for europeans to cope with the energy non-food crisis, then for the inhabitants of those countries the consequences are simply terrible, especially the difficult situation in africa south of the mediterranean sea. we must not forget this. of course, we sincerely regret the thousands of young people who died in ukraine, both from russia and from ukraine, but no one remembers the millions of people in eastern congo dying in terrible conditions. now yes, an interesting thought and now

i would like to note that 2022 has become a year of testing for the entire european union socio-economic energy crisis. the eu is more detailed in our story. since the eurozone crisis in 2009, europe has not had time to take a break from the upcoming problems of the influx of refugees in brest this coronavirus pandemic. all this drove the europeans into an economic hole. however, only now the european union is faced with an unprecedented crisis, which has turned a large international union into fragmented countries that are trying to cope with the consequences of earlier decisions, the biggest crisis. especially with the arrival of winter. the cost of gas and electricity utilities in europe have always been expensive, but over the past year prices have literally skyrocketed utility bills. almost tripled from 300 euros to almost 1,000 to make a cup of tea. i have used the

microwave before. and now i'm pouring water into an electric coffee maker. she consumes less and instead of taking a bath every day. i wash twice a week in the shower. the rest of the days in the sink suffered and the european industry the shortage of russian gas got fatal in greece the cotton gin and the spinning mill are worried about their future in an unstable energy environment and the enterprises were forced to reduce production, as orders from customers fell under threat and there is no staff, there is nowhere to take orders and salaries, our customers are now very worried, because they see a serious lack of sales in stores, which these days reaches 50% customers are also worried about whether they will be able to keep their factories in the face of natural gas shortages another painful topic. for europeans. fuel its cost is steadily rising one of the most dire situations in hungary local gas station owners are struggling to survive.

a catastrophe is brewing after the government announced it would cut off the supply of diesel and gasoline for sale as a result of about 400 filling stations being closed. these stations will run as long as they can, but when they close, will the agricultural industry be in trouble? the crisis has also affected health care, high energy prices have hit many european clinics, for example in germany according to the local federation of hospitals, the cost of electricity and gas has increased 10 times over the year and amounts to an average of 6 million euros, unbearable amounts eat up almost the entire budget of medical institutions. many are under threat of closure, we are very much affected by rising prices in a hospital that is in dire economic straits. because theoretically we are trying to cope with the costs and starting from the beginning of this year. and the most difficult situation, perhaps, has developed in the uk brexit. actions governments and economic crises have made britain the new sick man europe

has never been able to recover from the three blows it received at the start of the 21st century. as a result, the uk has lagged behind other rich countries, its population is getting poorer at a record pace, and inflation exceeds 11%, the british are less and less willing to put up with falling incomes and more often resort to at least strikes now protesting, literally everyone who can, doctors, teachers, postmen , machinists, firefighters civil servants poor people really need help because all the things they buy are getting more expensive, i have a daughter. she has gas and electricity and she has to choose. according to the forecasts of many experts, it cannot use either one or the other. the era of crises for the european union will last for several more years, we see that the primitive stamping of homeless package economic sanctions against belarus by the collective west against russia begins to subside. everything

that could be banned and limited. even if our partners have already done it to their own detriment. now the time has come for them to realize and evaluate the consequences of the word about energy food crises. already heard from all stands, to assume soon in individual countries. to these two crises, a third political symptom may be added. internal critical assessments, primarily from the population and business in a number of western countries, are being heard more and more loudly. a sensitive statement not about the economic collapse in our countries was dreamed of by sober judgments by observers of analysts of individual politicians that the sanctions hit

much more to the initiators themselves. now you and i will be able to see the details to discuss all the topics of the issues many times already mentioned called western unity in the face of crisis. but if you take a closer look at this concept, it will become clear that at the end of this year, relations between the us and the eu have become very aggravated, especially with regard to the well-known law to reduce inflation developed. as my colleague already mentioned. now a kind of atmosphere of war has reigned, as

a result, european countries have begun to rely heavily on the support of the united states, which will help us like big brother. because of this, the eu is now heavily dependent on the us leadership of the european union to pay an absolutely unjustified price, given that economically we are now in a position of losers on germany's trade balance for the first time since the second world war became negative and for us. this is a serious problem. after all, our entire economic model is based on the export of industrial products. our businesses are under threat of an energy crisis, food inflation. exceeded 10% now is almost 15%. these are all serious problems. however, the media is not political. not questioning the wisdom of supporting the war , moreover, they are sending more and more tanks to the eastern front instead of stopping

the war western politicians and media have recreated the atmosphere of the cold war and now claim that they are willing to pay for it at the same time opposition politicians, including remembers me that in the end it is ordinary people who pay the price for a war that no one needs for a scale war in this way the usual game more and more clearly see that it is they who have to pay them while the authorities. just want to feel the moral high ground with what people have to pay. they must take care of themselves, their families and children in their earnings and in the future, our political decisions must lead to an end to the war. after all, its continuation will cost too much. unfortunately , the eu leadership is convinced by various media that european countries need to stick together, that we

are in a state of cold water, and we must donate something. from her, i perfectly understand that ukrainians have to pay dearly for their ambitions. however. i ask a question. why is this for europeans? after all, many understand that the main beneficiary. the result is the united states of america of german politicians. the concern now is the desire to be morally superior to others, if you look at politicians, most of them, er, come from the middle class, who have never experienced poverty at the university. they study things related to politics, like political science gender studies or something like that. after that, they immediately got into the political space in this way. they never faced economic responsibility. they have never been filmed by business and everything that excites them is the desire to be morally superior to others. uh, how good they really believe

we west values ​​in an economy driven by those values ​​making climate change our top priority, when you believe moral superiority. they are in economic gain and even consider it immoral, then you accept. no, the leadership of brussels now we see that the behavior of politicians in brussels is contrary to the concept of homanokus, instead of it. we have godfather, moralikus, as during the french revolution i agree with the jacobins, i agree with you , and because politicians are guided by the wrong morals, even in my opinion, the antimoral radio does not take into account the interests of ordinary citizens. we are seeing dire consequences. however, my colleagues here, as well as journalists from major media outlets, are convinced that sanctions on the

supply of arms will morally prolong the war . justified. you know, but i can't help but discuss with you the international concern about the war in ukraine i still can't understand why the organization union, founded after the second world war to prevent new conflicts, is now engaged in warmongering. they take the initiative to stop it. everyone expected europe to take whatever steps were necessary to achieve peace. they will become the main supporter of the war, what do you think about this

tatyana you cannot but notice that sometimes european politicians do not even try to find ways to peacefully resolve the conflict. obzhezinsky know very many have heard about the plans, life threatens with an iron curtain that would stretch from the baltic sea to the black and caspian seas . he wanted to use the six countries that are now part of the eastern partnership, as well as the baltic countries, to divide europe from lisbon to the urals or even vladivostok came

to the european parliament. what would enable us to develop a strong economy? resources and western technologies do not want the execution of this scenario do not want to see a close relationship within our continent. they spread hatred towards russia, and poland became a tool in their hands to move in one direction. this direction has changed

mission chewed ah. well, do you agree with this that ukraine for a long time had a chance to give a bridge between the west in general and the european union in particular and russia that later, unfortunately, the ukrainian authorities, especially after the presidency of petro poroshenko, decided to become the main enemy of russia with something like anti-russian government. do you see a way to end this war, given that in ukraine now, to my great regret, no one is considering options for a peaceful resolution of the current situation. perhaps the european leader

should talk to the ukrainian authorities on this topic. it's a million dollar question. i wish i knew, first of all, it's rather interesting that not so long ago there were so many people here. the building of the european parliament for days on end talked about peace and the peaceful settlement of conflicts, and now in full only and do. that they are discussing weapons, new wars and new victims. secondly, it is surprising that people talk all day about human rights, but at the same time completely deny the rights of russian-speaking minorities. of course, i am for respect, human rights and fully support the right to self-determination. however, what applies to people all over the world should also apply to people in crimea or donbass as well as russian-speaking substances in some states in eastern

europe. i do not have a solution for a peaceful settlement of the conflict, but i have to note it that the main issue no longer applies to the minsk agreements at all. today it should sound like to ensure the peace process, so that there are no winners and losers, we need to make sure that neither russia nor ukraine are the losers. this is a difficult question, which was answered by john f. kennedy during the cuban missile crisis in the early sixties, john f. kennedy ordered the military departments. in this crisis. there are no winners or losers and the soviet union and the united states won. after all , we buried the world this is how the european union should act now from me. this is

not often heard, but i agree with the president of france macron, who said that russia will not leave on its own and will defend the occupied territory. and to dialogue with russia and to respect the russian -speaking minority in other countries. it is in this way that peace can be achieved, especially considering that now the threat of world conflict is growing day by day, we are in a very dangerous situation. it's out of control now, while the eu and the us support the war. i really sad to admit that there are people who will be happy to fight to the last ukrainians. but i

can’t help but note that now it’s only 19 ° maximilian in the building of the european parliament, it’s pretty cool here, but as i understand it, according to european officials. the fact that civil servants deputies have to freeze. this, in their opinion , helps ukraine but being a ukrainian. i want to emphasize that the provision of peace negotiations. as mr. jovan said, he would become better than a squirrel with his hands, you need to understand how politics is thought. they they return to you that there is a law according to which ukraine has its own territory, and according to which ukraine has the right to take back the lost territory, but personally, i'm not sure that if we hold questions in ukraine, then the majority will vote for the continuation of the war and the date of that until the territories are returned to them

for the recognition of the current line. whether the front. in short, the fire, perhaps the inhabitants of kharkiv or dnipro would prefer to recognize the current front line of the ceasefire line, but now it is impossible to hear the opinion of ordinary ukrainians. we only hear here leader voices. of course, this war has many sides. this is a war not only between ukraine and russia, but also between the west and russia, and also between go and western unipolarity, according to which western countries will determine what political course we should choose other states and ideas of multipolarity, according to which each superpower has its own scope, influence can be found arguments. there

is a huge number of wars in the world now war in yemen war in africa wars around the world and i see that they do not excite any of my colleagues. the reason why everyone is paying so much attention to the war between russia and ukraine is that this war is not just between russia and ukraine, but a war that will determine the world order for the next 10-15 years. this is a war with the world order. and when we are at war with the world order, then, uh, i’m sorry, says such things to ukrainians in this situation, it’s very convenient to have russia as a scapegoat energy crisis in the food crisis and so on all russia’s crimes are an easy way out. i agree with maximilian that the war in ukraine is really very important. however, there is much more attention for

chairman xi jinping to saudi arabia, if there is an alliance between saudi arabia and china, within which oil will be paid in yuan, yes, in a different currency, and not in us dollars, then this will be a serious shift in the global balance of power in my opinion, and you and maximilian share my concern that we are so obsessed with the large-scale western propaganda of the war in ukraine that we forgot the next world is not subject to the west. we agree with you that the war between ukraine and russia or nato and russia occupies an important place in the world. but more importantly, perhaps the war between the west and the rest of the world in the east is home to about two-thirds or even three-quarters of the

world's population. so it is worth paying attention to the positions of india and indonesia and of course, the subtle game of turkey in the talking games complex, tatiana agrees, but now we are hearing very aggressive rhetoric from the polish government. we also know how tense relations have developed between the belarusian and polish authorities in order to be strong, it is necessary to have an army of good weapons - this is the main thing, and there is only one option not to prevent the war, but to be ready for it. yes, the jokes drank,

because it was registered there, the next supply of weapons, ukrainian. refer my previous thoughts. this is only the revenge of certain political forces and players for the defeat in world war ii of the ukrainian diaspora, which were associated with hitler, the baltic diaspora, including latvian, which were associated with hitler, the european union and the united states of the

second world war, all jews were subject to destruction today in their place were russians defoe you say that russia as a state is responsible for many atrocities, but do not forget that the russians, as a large ethnic group, were forcibly separated after the collapse of the soviet union at least russian-speaking people now live in the european union, while their total number around the world is about 25 million people many of them traditionally live in the same territory, for example, the eastern part of latvia and religions with such phenomena.

no one cares if these russians support putin or the opposition my country yesterday from calling the license of the rain channel, this is an opposition tv channel that existed and worked in russia for more than three years, and in latvia lasted only 3 months the channel was deprived of a license for some the words of the journalist, who were censored by the authorities, said that they sound too positive towards putin and that it is unacceptable to talk again, because this year ukraine has become a candidate for joining the european union. despite the fact that for many years she was

denied this. including due to the existing problems in the field of democracy and human rights, however , in today's ukraine, some of these problems have significantly worsened, for example, criticizing the actions of the official authorities. the media were banned from the russian language and the languages ​​of other minorities are suppressed by the leader of the position, viktor medvedchuk , who speaks for peace, was first detained for many months, and later completely expelled from the country. even some about european. opposition politicians are forced to flee the country, nevertheless, the leadership of the european union decided to ignore all these facts and proclaim kiev as a model of european values, but do n’t you think that something is wrong with these values ​​today, of course, look who becomes the first

victim war, really. yes, it's a childish saying. we know what we're talking about. and if you go to any eu institution today, one of my colleagues visited ukraine before the current crisis. i personally was there that i know what i'm talking about, in general, it seems to me that out of ten percent of such people will not be typed. and now they are joining the general trend and repeating the phenomena that there is a war going on now and that in this war we are on the side of good, they are told that ukraine is a sucker democratic liberal country that supports lgbtq plus communities, and within these walls a lot of attention is paid to this. ukraine appears as such shining graces on a hill in the middle of eastern europe and on the other side a gloomy homophobic repressive authoritarian mordor, who died in corruption by sauron himself, sitting in the

kremlin, minal convinces people to support sanctions and the supply of new weapons to the eastern front, and since ukraine is the most shining city, then it will be gladly accepted into europe, such propaganda has its consequences at the same while the admission of ukraine to the eu may become one of the conditions if we want to achieve a truce situation in which both sides remain winners, it is quite obvious that russia will never give up crimea that russia cannot give up, donetsk is the same most crimean channel. i am not talking now, not about the

legal side of the issue, what she will receive in return, in order to also be able to consider herself the winning side and membership in the eu could be with such a prize. we seem to be saying, yes, you have actually lost control over a quarter of your territory, if you do not have to choose between the admission of ukraine to nato and the admission of ukraine to the european union, then i will definitely choose the second option, as russia needs a buffer zone. we are in the european parliament. almost ready to give green light to eu accession albania north macedonia herzegovina maybe serbia and other countries so why not add ukraine to this list the difficulty is that

if we want to achieve restoration of peace, how do we make both sides feel like winners, if we accept that russia retains control over some of those territories, what about? of course, uh, you can't mention it. washington often voices here what then ukraine will receive in return for the parties for ukraine consequently, russia will remain safe.

i'm talking about respect for the territorial integrity of national minorities and so on. you see, in our words, we remind emmanuel macron more and more. what is the problem, both for him and for me. you know, the question is not exactly in relations between ukraine and the european union. i spent this week in brussels and, of course, i saw the results of the football match between spain and moroca. and it was so awful frightening. it was not scary to leave the hotel, because i watched myself were driven by migrants from morocco as they lightened. what were the clashes with the police. i almost forgot i also met an elderly man from france who was shocked by what was happening, who told me this is not my group. we lost europe, so the opinion of ordinary residents is in our hands. don't you think that officials. from the european parliament

ignore the opinion of ordinary europeans as a key issue virus at least we call it a virus the western world has moved away from its historical cultural heritage. and, of course, these approaches go down. us with the tops of the ivory towers come up with all sorts of crazy theories like the idea of ​​the french figures derida and foucault they tell us that there is no such thing as identity or the nature of things? what can make the world like this? how do you want to see it, that there is no moral responsibility to the ancestors or the nation of leftist

ideas, the european union turns into shit in the afternoon, as for brussels, this city is really hit hard by this virus and was watched in football. of course, this question concerns the relations between political elites and ordinary citizens. and if you ask an ordinary worker in a factory. uh, then you won't hear support or ideas from him. well, as far as the middle class is concerned, everything is not so obvious, really. there are people who vote for the left, especially for green big cities. they can even make up the majority of votes, of course, this topic is related to the war between russia and ukraine

in the way that russia and hungary are louder with it. everyone speaks out against this wave. that is why it is so easy for politicians to portray russia fracture in the flesh. they can just say that russia is against their liberal fantastic brave new world a. now it has also invaded the wonderful liberal tolerant ukraine, which means that it needs to be fought, and thus there is really a moral aspect in this war, they are really fighting for the opportunity to lead a liberal policy to live with open borders for everyone, and so on. however, first of all. this is problem. there is no democracy, but western people support business politics and economics

russia for us russia is a place where culture remains traditional. and steels and we are now faced with the problem of attitude politics. we sympathize with russia, but at the same time, our countries are de facto at war with her now. i would like to pay attention to the relationship that has developed over the past few years between the european union and the republic of belarus in more detail in our story. diplomatic relations between belarus and the european union were established in august 1992 during the development they were characterized by both periods of activation

and cooling, significant positive shifts occurred in 2016, at that time a coordination group of belarus was established with a dialogue across the entire spectrum of bilateral cooperation between minsk and brussels, subsequently as part of the intensification of political contacts between belarus and the eu the country was repeatedly visited by european commissioners. in 2020, relations cracked, the west once again refused to recognize the results of the presidential elections. the european union imposed visa sanctions against a number of officials in belarus and the enterprise stopped cooperation on a number of issues. directions guys. belarusian exports of potash fertilizers and oil products also fell. however, first of all. this hit the european union, many european farmers in the sowing season were left without the most important fertilizer. the shortage provoked a rise in prices for them, and drought and abnormal heat jeopardized the entire future eu harvest, while the ricochet west sanction did not stop their own ambitions turned out to be much more important than

the well-being of the people to look forward to. waiting for acceptance decisive action to tighten sanctions against belarus is absolutely necessary, because what is happening in belarus is still a tragedy, and we must act decisively in response to the unfriendly actions of the european union belarus was forced. suspend your participation in the eastern partnership. this initiative included cross-border cooperation repair and renovation of border infrastructure, green technologies and small business and educational projects. at the same time, thanks to the assistance of belarus to establish peace. in ukraine, unique minsk agreements were created after the start of the military conflict in ukraine, minsk has repeatedly called on the parties to return to them and sit down at the negotiating table. not only the latter. isn't there already a pole or what mercenaries? well, it's their business, it's their right. bye. for example, i and our special services do not see that they are ready for full-fledged

negotiations to negotiate in a human way . they see, in our opinion, how to continue the war, however, ukraine did not need peace, according to ex-president of the country petro poroshenko, the minsk agreements were needed to gain time and strengthen the combat capability of the ukrainian army. with the support of nato, we didn’t want war and don’t want it, but it’s good that it’s only recently. you probably followed that president poroshenko spoke out. why did he need it? minsk, these negotiations and so on. it turns out he was preparing for war. well, something will be blamed before us, that, well, he is guilty of something, well, he was preparing for the plan. so today the ex-chancellor is disentangling this situation the other day. mr angela merkel's in an interview with a german newspaper, the site also admitted that in 2014 the conflict was suspended, but the problem itself remained unresolved. the minsk agreements were an attempt to give kiev time for these 8 years.

ukraine was able to strengthen its potential ukraine 2014-2015 is not ukraine today at the beginning of 2015 . putin could easily capture them. and i very much doubt that then the nato countries could do as much as they are doing now to help ukraine , it was clear to all of us that this was a frozen conflict, that the problem had not been resolved, but that was exactly what ukraine precious time. if that were the case, as she says, it's disgusting. but it's not. who as it really is, it's not just disgusting. it's disgusting. no. no, the president of russia became aware of this. he did not expect such an attack by angela merkel, she acted petty disgusting. she

wants to be in trend worldly conventions and attitude. no. this is a very serious meeting of everyone sat around the world talking about what they finally did. the war has stopped, people have stopped dying. all this will be positively assessed today against that background talk about the fact that they are with poroshenko well , consider this one, old whom she led by the hand in front of my eyes. they allegedly deceived the flying operation. there, everyone, first of all putin and everyone in the world, was given a pause to

prepare the ukrainian army for this war. if that were the case, that would be too much. just know, that's deceived prepared for war now. well, if this is so, it is not so, but if so, then why be true that there is a war going on, you were preparing for it, and we know for sure in the near future. i told putin, we will publish these as they should have been after the twentieth year of the rebellion in belarus if the situation develops and they come out on the border of the smolensk region, the statov, they were looking to seize power from us, a war was started against russia from the donbass, because to listen to the fact that russia had captured foreign intelligence there, a war was to begin in 21 maybe in the twenty-second year russia freedom is ahead of the curve, so russia should not be reproached for the force of merkel’s poroshenko’s statement

already in the statement that russia started the war, they are their e, marks and poroshenko at least turn out to be theirs significant that the ukrainian army, see fighting resist. the strongest of the strongest armies of the world, because then we deceived everyone in minsk and the world was a demon, deceived russia and so on and the vile lie that doesn’t look like measurements, that they did this in order to deceive everything was serious, then it was already possible to this time to act. let's go the way that putin offered and the contract was concluded today. uh, apart from klim, there was no war in ukraine, according to the official representative of the russian foreign ministry, maria zakharova, the words merkel confirm that the eu was not originally going to implement the peace agreements in these revelations. it sounded. the main thing was everything. from

the point of view of the west, it was just falsification, it was flirting with the use of international law. with the sole purpose of pumping weapons into the kiev regime dr. shtanov dr. zhdanov this year, the leadership of the european union has aggravated the already tense relationship with the republic, belarus is sure. you understand that at the same time officials in brussels are ignoring the economic consequences for europe to which such a policy may lead, as well as the role that minsk has played in the past in resolving the current conflict, we already spoke today on the minsk agreement. what

do you think, if there is a chance that next year brussels will choose the path of a more constructive dialogue, or still you should not count on improving relations between the european union and the republic of belarus unfortunately, the permanent elite, governments in european countries, relations will sometimes worsen, unless, of course, we are watching and double standards of the eastern partnership. belarus was not included in it here is the pretext that lukashenka is europe's last dictator vladimir putin in the political game when minsk

decided to take politics. after that, the belarusian representatives yes, therefore, regrettably, but we do not see any desire to destroy this wall of

misunderstanding. this is true, and politics now has really come down to dividing the world into white blacks. as you told them the maximilator in life, everything is not so, it does not happen that they are alone absolutely good, while others are absolutely bad. let me say that i have never voted in recent years for the european union to have two bridges with russia, the first should be maldova, its former president igor dodon, and the second belarus is now western propaganda and western politicians are making an enemy out of belarus, wondering question. will belarus eventually unite with russia, i am sad about this, since belarus was an ideal bridge between eastern europe and asia on the one hand and western europe on the other hand. at the same time, unfortunately, we have lost a lot of opportunities for building bridges. we only burned the ones that were and

now i repeat we are in a very dangerous position where instead of bridges, war could become suitable bridges, as spain was once a bridge between latin america and the european union, we could focus on this positive example, considering how many russian-speaking people who understand russia live in our countries in our today. is equal indeed there was a hope of creating a bridge that would allow building economic cooperation and

cultural exchange between western europe on the one hand and russia and the rest of the post-soviet countries on the other. and if this happened, europe would have gained greater political independence and more opportunities compared to the cold war period. she would be able to cooperate with both the east and the west. however, if we are now returning to the state of the cold war and building only new iron curtain, then we can have close ties only with the west, the united states, in fact, the european union turned out to be the loser, as we lost political prospects and now play the role of the little brother of the united states in their global strategies. it's a big loss for us and people in brussels don't understand that we're losing opportunities they think in return. we get a lot in moral terms sooner

or later, however, they realize that you will not be fed up with moral superiority. and that they can’t close holes in the economy, we will have to wait for this moment to change the political course, but in the meantime, we are waiting for a wave of stormy enthusiasm from the realization of moral superiority, for which everyone is ready to sacrifice both the country's economy and political opportunities. thank you very much. i am very grateful to have agreed to take part in our program, despite the current geopolitical context, and i understand that today such a decision requires serious political courage from so many convictions. thank you very much in conclusion. i would like to remind our viewers one great quote from an american publicist. joseph daniels. the army is people

gathered in one place for the sole purpose of correcting the mistakes of diplomats and politicians. i very much hope that smart diplomats and politicians from east and west will soon gather in some place to represent our societies and contribute to the fact that the mistakes of diplomats are resolved, but already without use. thank you very much it was. special project of the program very much to declare from the european parliament

show in which two worlds have united virtual game and real fights and lofty goals, but for the elite does not exist. here there is all the fear , tears, pain and victory, the participants will have to go through the most difficult tests.