Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]  BELARUSTV  December 14, 2022 6:35pm-7:01pm MSK

6:35 pm
see the highest place in the sky in sports projects on belarus 24 tv channel in our program, the most active schoolchildren from all over belarus, alexandra, i answered option b in the fourth, since five will meet 125 75/4 is 625. i know that the middle ages divided into three periods - this is early middle and late, so i answered. yes, they will find answers to all questions, the time signature of the waltz is 3/4, because here the stock is three beats one, two, three, to be honest, i answered no, because more i am inclined in this definition to the answer, they are ready to surprise and win the altar with two letters. n, firstly, because to break what to do, and because there is a dependent word here by accident. watch an intellectual entertainment show. i know on belarus 24 tv channel. they came to
6:36 pm
belarus from different parts of the world, and they have their own view of the country for 20 years. i already live in belarus in the city of lida and the city of lida has become a very native city for me. i love him very much. i was just looking for what country i would be in to treat very, in short, education and then, but i found out about our university. true, we must grow with you and become every day. better and better, watch the project a look at belarus on our tv channel. belarusian winter little things and all the details what is breathtaking? some awkward
6:37 pm
looking at them you feel aesthetic pleasure. do you feel that belarus is closer? hello viewer. my name is igor tur. this is my propaganda , let's start, if i made a rating of cities that i would not like to visit again, then the capital kyrgyzstan, bishkek would definitely be somewhere at the top. well, it’s true that we all only praise our partners and allies, and just because it’s customary, looking ahead, it’s usually customary to say, they say. but in
6:38 pm
kyrgyzstan, people are good, kind, sympathetic and hospitable, that's all in general. well, of course it is, but in general, people there are different, as in belarus, as in russia, as in europe, in the usa, and even as in australia as a whole, the kyrgyz, guys are wonderful, but here is one local traffic police officer with this staff of his and stone-faced, not letting through a diplomatic car with the flag of belarus and journalists on board the hotel. when the ether burns, the impression is smeared. so last week the journalists of the presidential pool visited bishkek, i was there for the second time, the city has become a little more beautiful over the past few years, i don’t argue, but in general it is such a regional center during the collapse of the ussr, and when you fly back to minsk from such cities you begin to relate a little differently to what is at hand and what you just got used to wide avenues of neat infrastructure so you know the cleanliness of the streets and everything else as a comic proposal to increase love for your
6:39 pm
homeland and awareness of its advantages. it would be nice to take all belarusians around the countries of the former ussr so that everyone has the opportunity to compare how our country is and how our country is wonderful in itself, but in comparison it is magnificent. the world is not only a resort, the zone of egypt and turkey, the world is not the tourist zones of france, italy and god forbid, in germany the world is not only the skyscrapers of new york, which are beautiful only from afar, when the homeless in the squares and the avenue unnoticed, just like the strange soviet bloc. they are different, we had one common historical point and some countries, as we ran in development, others went third, remained in place of the fourth - this, too, however, began to back away here, opponents will have an argument about the baltic states, but there is a nuance, a strange baltic - these are three political escorts. escorts can also be male, of course, and this is even such a modern trend in general. but lithuania, latvia and estonia are strangely
6:40 pm
feminine. so those who were about to attack me on the topic of sexism. hang up for those who don't know. now it is customary to call an escort a woman who temporarily or permanently comes under the financial support of rich men in return, providing them with sexual services. and don't show off before. such women were called prostitutes or words more sharply, but times have changed. and now the same thing, in fact, may have very different packaging. so here are the strange baltics, how the escorts switched to financial maintenance. west, yes, perhaps, the escorts were put in order, washed , combed they bought a new dress, perhaps they pumped up their lips and put an escort next to them in an expensive car, of course, they publicly talk about how well done they are, how they have achieved everything. how life has become better, more beautiful, brighter. after all, before you had to fight for food with dogs, and today on the table, caviar is only the essence of all this from mapping, and in return, women lose the right to be women with a capital letter, and
6:41 pm
countries lose the opportunity to call themselves fully states, because if you are fully financially supported if you don't have to showing off to give the owner what he wants at any time in any place, whatever fur coat you have on, and in whatever you are. or are you just a political prostitute, devoid of any sovereignty, and this is the purest truth, there is another path that the countries of the eurasian economic union have taken - independent development, of course, not as fast as signing an agreement on the sale of sovereignty, but sovereign, and this led us to the point, when western sanctions, with which we were, well, so much frightened by ineffective not because the west has weakened, but because we have become stronger alexander lukashenko spoke about this at the summit on friday, the phenomenon of a joke, there was no economic collapse, our countries resigned themselves to the sober judgments of observers of analysts
6:42 pm
of individual politicians that the sanctions hit the initiators themselves much more, while the eu as its cis and other associations. there are lukashenka, you know such managers as alexander grigorievich may not like colleagues for the fact that people like shishenko are constantly looking for shortcomings both in themselves and in those who are around voice them and urge everyone to become better sometimes, when such a person is in the vertical of management, then he tries to block the upward movement of this vertical, because they say, everything is fine with us here relatively calmly. we are in a warm office with a decent salary. and then he suddenly muddies the water with his own. let's fix this and this, but it's people like lukashenka, those who are not afraid to see the problem of acceptance, voice it, offer a solution and persuade everyone else to take action to solve the problem. such people give us progress with which then we all use it at the highest level, when it seems like the end of the year and it is customary to talk more about
6:43 pm
achievements, the speech of such a rational rebel looks approximately. this is how we continue to grapple with the consequences of unilateral decisions at the national level. we cannot export the forest. we do not allow international road carriers to pass there, while the search for mutually acceptable solutions to problematic issues stretches for long months of meeting, sometimes a lot of decisions are few. why does lukashenko publicly criticize the free unions, in which minsk is and is not included, and also sometimes criticizes the allies, packing it all in the form of councils. sometimes someone in russia is criticized, not putin and not all of russia, but precisely a separate force there, which importantly indicates the debatability of yerevan’s position, analytics hints at tashkent’s shortcomings, enters into controversy with nursultan from astana, and so on. he can afford it,
6:44 pm
because he has been in this profession for a very long time . the profession of president is the essence of which is the preservation of the sovereignty of his country. he is extremely successful in this and there are few such successful professionals next to him. if there is at all and everyone around understands and accepts that lukashenka is a president of the highest level, because other presidents have come and gone, being replaced by green ones, green ones have matured and left, and he was not always, but for a long time and when he is also a mastodon, although smaller than angela merkel allows itself a public story that the west needed the minsk agreements only in order to buy time and give kiev the opportunity to prepare for war. that is, neither kiev nor germany and france were going to fulfill the agreement, and so lukashenka allows himself to answer. that's the way merkel is. i did n't expect that either. and the president of russia said this, he did not expect such an attack by angela merki. she
6:45 pm
acted small. nasty, she wants to be trendy. this is where the main feature, modern western politics, the complete absence of strategies and a pivot to please, populism and political turmoil, of course, mrs. merkel, was revealed. it’s just that now in the west the topic is allegedly heroic support for ukraine, and therefore today the statement itself is pulled on the globe of facts in 2015 europe and germany especially didn’t want a war in ukraine and really didn’t want to break relations with russia, because then they signed multibillion-dollar gas supply contracts with it, like and gas pipelines were built for billions of dollars, and then merkel almost dragged poroshenko by the ear to negotiate with putin, and then poroshenko was accused at home of surrendering ukraine at the behest of berlin, because then so it was beneficial to germany and merkel personally. but
6:46 pm
today, that sound position will not cause the necessary reactions from the political beau monde. american and european, which is almost entirely american, and merkel comes out and lies. i assure you, when russia successfully completes its. the same merkel will come out and say that, in fact, to be honest, berlin has been trying to rein in all the years, kiev, but they were either not controlled or controlled only by the united states and this is not merkel alone such a scoundrel. this is the principle of western diplomacy in general. now say what profitable, and how much it is, the truth is not significant. there are just two problems. this blah blah show is believed by ordinary people and based on this lie they make a political choice that brings more and more liars and populists into politics, and the second we still thought that merkel was not like that, that she was really the iron lady who would not to get dirty in a pomp, but at her expense they made a mistake merkel is no different from, for example, aristovich. those
6:47 pm
negotiations in minsk were extremely important for the whole of europe and not only for ukraine and russia, and not even so the minsk agreements were strategically important for europe no less than for ukraine, and the subsequent meeting of contact groups in minsk for several years - this was confirmed by all politicians. the west, including the same merkel, publicly emphasized that there were alternatives to the minsk agreements. no, just now populism, unfortunately, has become an alternative to logic and truth, merkel and poroshenko want to show their importance that the ukrainian army. look , one of the strongest armies in the world is fighting, because we then deceived everyone in minsk and the world everyone was deceived by russia and so on, small and vile at the same time. surely alexander grigorievich has some kind of story in store from that meeting that compromises mrs. merkel and emphasizes either her pettiness or deceit, but
6:48 pm
lukashenka did not. go down to the level of the german chancellor and publish something about it. but if anything, they say, even the walls have ears it is possible that the walls of the palace of independence in minsk also have the eyes of the norman four. in minsk, it has always been called a colossal success of our diplomacy. now. this colossal success has been multiplied by our success in the fact that last week we removed the euro from our basket of currencies. there now the russian ruble is the chinese yuan, and still the us dollar is quite obvious that the kremlin and putin personally are bringing down the current economic system in the world, the basis of which is just a dirty green paper, as zhirinovsky said, if the dollar prevents the civilized world from living, then you need to to bring him down even in the toilet. if you have to, if lukashenka is already open. says the dollar is coming the end. he doesn't wishful thinking. he just can afford to speak out loud the purest truth. it is already clear to everyone that the era
6:49 pm
of donor domination is ending. the future belongs to trading blocks, calculations in which national currencies and about the dollar will be made. lukashenka was asked by russian journalists following the results of the summit. whose desire to record an interview with the belarusian president it has already become a tradition to refuse the dollar. yes, there is no product. you do not refuse. we were forced, first of all, along this path, and when we were forced to say, well, nothing, we are satisfied with the russian ruble, that, in fact, for many years and a very long time, alexander grigoryevich called on both moscow and other allies to abandon the dollar in mutual settlements and switch to the national currency, for example, there are no problems with the russian ruble, but the calls of the belarusian leader did not meet due reactions, because the kremlin has a lot of towers and some towers were more comfortable and better at working with the dollar. so that's from the
6:50 pm
wording of the moscow colleague. we are abandoning the dollar. my own eye twitched a little, as well as from another question of these crazy european scenes, the current prices for russian citizens are fine. let me translate this question, essentially. does it sound like you are satisfied that belarus is selling gas not at market prices, but at special contract prices with a clear push to the side. let minsk publicly say that thanks to moscow there are no problems at all. thanks sincerely to both fraternal peoples, it is worth thanking each other more often for help. although both peoples help, not in order to hear public gratitude, but because that we are really brothers. isn't that so, but if you go back strictly to the economy, minsk never asked for a low price for gas minsk asked for a level playing field and a low price for gas is not the reason. this is a consequence, if you get 60 or
6:51 pm
80 dollars. we get 120 dollars at the border there, for example, gas. well, what are the equal conditions here, i will not be able to sell my goods on your market. and if i can, then i need to cut salaries and so on in order to compete, therefore, the main thing is not gas, equal conditions. let the gas be go 1,600 dollars, as in europe, god forbid, of course, but equally in russia and belarus. this is important for us. it would be great if all the kremlin towers heard lukashenko, otherwise it will be like with the dollar, when what we are doing now and urgently could have been done a long time ago, if the belarusian president had been listened to. alexander lukashenko himself is also ready to hear and listen, even if we are talking about problems, not even so about problems that need to be solved. he is ready to listen first of all when we praise our healthcare system, which has put in
6:52 pm
pandemics are great. and how do you think otherwise only those who do not know how medicine works in other countries, such beloved pseudo-democratic countries , so the counterargument is often the lack of personnel is a problem. yes, it really does exist. yes, especially in the regions and an attempt to turn a blind eye to the problem and pretend that it does not exist. this is wrong real-life situations with frames, what's going on? i know we have made strong steps in terms of education. there, like 60 percent of the target audience, up to 8, we are moving towards to recruit such doctors who graduate, and we will know where they will go, we need to train doctors in our country who will work for their country in their homeland, that is, at the snap of their fingers or even in a month and problems cannot be solved. this means that those who should solve the problem should now roll up their sleeves and begin to eliminate the problems of their causes. and we well
6:53 pm
, i'll tell you how it is. yes, in some places you will need to wait a bit for an appointment with a doctor or in a queue or sign up in advance. i will only say that the demands of citizens on the healthcare system are sometimes overestimated and sometimes angry reaction on the network to the fact that i had to wait an hour for an appointment in a situation where the main problem is snot in winter. this is also unfair for doctors now is a hot time, and the whole system is trying. we told them. thank you when we were scared in a pandemic. let's be honest, it's like an airplane shaking. in the air and everyone in the cabin abruptly became, well, already such believers, and somewhere this faith instantly evaporates for many along with the successful landing of the aircraft. here we are and we stopped being afraid to die from the coronavirus and that's it doctors. we say thank you less, and more often we scold. this is wrong, dear doctors. thank you for your work. thank you for saving our lives always, and not only when the cause of our fear is a hype new disease, and the president
6:54 pm
continues to joke so that those who are terribly distracted from the cause of fear and smile so a little easier, as it is easier to cope with any illness to those who think about their health preventively, and not only when they are already sick. give up bad habits. do not use in all sorts of rubbish food. go in for sports, or at least physical education, help you doctors. i already have some kind of respiratory disease. at one time i picked it up, but thank god i did not contact you. i think, okay, i will treat myself in hockey. you know my methods, and also lukashenka’s methods in pinpointing up to adjusting laws, if justice requires it, the housing problem for large families and military personnel became last week the topic of a separate meeting in the palace of independence was alexander’s sole decisions grigorievich changes the laws in belarus yes, he did it, he
6:55 pm
does it and he will continue to do it. after all, the only goal of such decisions and their motive is fair care for those who find it difficult to choose professions not because of high salaries. at least, this should be the starting point, so providing housing for state employees and especially people who defend belarus will always be a priority of the state housing policy. i have repeatedly stressed that people with many children are in uniform. these are our priorities. i just added that having many children families and military personnel should never forget that this is not the duty of the state and not the duty of lukashenka personally, this is, in general, a gift for the sake of presenting which the president goes to
6:56 pm
change laws and existing systems, but i will add a fly in the ointment, for example, military personnel have two officers, both under the decree on apartments are both important for the state, but one is very well understood directly. in all these decrees, benefits and other mechanisms of benefits from the state, and the second. well, he just can't do it. we don't give him although given to him to be. a first-class specialist in electronic security, so in such matters the state should not only create a mechanism for obtaining apartments, and then spin as you like, because some know how to spin well, but they know how to work worse, while others give their all to the profession and decide on their apartments and there is no time and the skills of the state system should also be managed by departmentalism. in this matter , no one should be pulling the blanket over himself. and here is the decision at the top. now we will provide everyone with housing, whoever runs ahead, whoever runs
6:57 pm
faster, will get more and get it should not happen sometime. one of my friends said that lukashenka is the keeper of the balances of belarus, this is one of the most accurate formulations of the presidency in our country, you quickly get used to the balance. it quickly ceases to seem like something special. it would be better and fairer to appreciate the balance. before we shake the plane in the air. my name is igor tur. this was my propaganda together with the stars, expert psychotherapists, always, when a person has some kind of unrealistic. the goal is not achieved, which in itself is understandable. it can always be justified. probably you have not completed something, let's discuss the topical issues that we
6:58 pm
face every day. here is the amount of money for you limited chiki, please bring it. i 'll see what you are before such a total control of a woman who works as a muse and a keeper of the hearth. she risks that one day. she will cease to be interested in her man, we will teach you how to safely resolve any conflict situations. man need with base work with your roots. why did his tree cling to this earth. watch the concept of harmlessness on belarus 24 tv channel in the program. they came to belarus from different parts of the world, and they have their own view of the country for 20 years. i already live in belarus in the city of lida and the city of lida has become a very native city for me. i love him very much. i was just looking for a country in which a country i would be treated very, in short, education and
6:59 pm
then, but i found out about our university. true larus. we must grow with you to become with every day. better and better, watch the project a look at belarus on our tv channel.
7:00 pm
at the beginning briefly the main topics of the issue decision of citizenship of national interests and security

19 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on