what, while the prevention of our citizens is that the commission of criminal acts, and against the state against national security, and regardless of the grounds for acquiring citizenship. may lead to the loss of citizenship of the republic of belarus in the belarusian state row. the university held the republican day of the chief physician in the event. more than 400 heads of health care institutions of belarus took part on the agenda of a number of issues. including the current situation and prospects and development of medical accreditation of staffing and salaries of health workers. a mixture of talent of intellect and creativity of the winner of the republican competition. the student of the year 2022 was announced at the minsk city palace of culture, students of the vitebsk state technological university yaroslav ivanov guys. more than 50 qualifying rounds have passed. there are 15 finalists in total. to measure strength in

creative competitions and oratory, traditionally, each participant also claims to win in the additional nomination student of the year online such contests make it possible to single out these guys, very enterprising and purposeful. e patriots of their country and ready-made leaders who have the ability and opportunity to lead in minsk on the basis of the spiritual and educational center ark of st. elisabeth monastery, the days of memory of metropolitan philaret to the hierarch who served the belarusian orthodox church for more than 40 years are dedicated to the exhibition and film screenings and television films, spiritual conversations chronicling the life of an outstanding clergyman can follow through the photo exhibition the heart graciously celebrating a unique display for a memory project. presented by the minsk theological academy and the church history museum. today is the day of the angel, lord philaret's name day.

a special edition of the saas program is authorized to announce from the heart of the european union from brussels i want to note that for the first time in the history of belarusian television. we are hosting the program from the studio of the press center of the european parliament and a few steps away from me is the voting room, where key decisions are made. for the entire european union i am pleased to announce that there are already deputies of the european parliament with me in the studio, each of whom represents their country, it is with them that we will talk about the results of this difficult year for the entire european union as a whole and about a possible dialogue

between states. i am very happy to welcome all of you to our studio and first. i would like to introduce our dear guests, dr. maxim for the sake of a member of the european parliament of germany, dr. member of parliament from latvia good evening and mr ervezevan mep from france i am glad to see you here today and we will start with a quick survey asking you to answer as briefly as possible whether the leadership of the european union deserves a gift from santa claus this year the leadership of the european union never deserved a gift from santa claus and 2022 nothing has changed, but because our politicians make decisions that are aimed at them at the world elites in general in particular. they are on the common

people all the politicians who ignore the citizens and do not like them deserves no gift rather. punishment they made so many mistakes they got so far from reality that they ended up from it further they would not meet. they sit in their towers and ivory and see nothing of the doctor. and if your country's politicians deserve a gift from santa claus, i don't know if they deserve a gift, but they will get it anyway, like everyone else at christmas. so the question is funny , but i'm asking this question because many europeans ask themselves. how did the european allied war come about

between the west and russia politicians in the european union make decisions based on what they consider to be morally right, because of this they are ready to sacrifice their economies in order to look good and feel morally superior to others, it is obvious to them that ukraine is a victim and big russia in the neighborhood is aggressor on the territory of another country. they believe that it is necessary to confront these crestors as a sign of the victim's solidarity, even if there is a price to pay, but this price, of course, is paid by the eu leadership, except that the meeting says a less bright light than before this time falls on the shoulders of enterprises and employees of pensioners and all those who are now

suffering from inflation, and the politician’s idea is that now they can tell us support ukraine to pay for this. uh, in our support, i'll tell you and do you think this opinion is supported by all europeans or in society, after all, there is a split in the ussr, we observe a civil war in europe. the continent itself is the leadership of some people, including politics. you even the presidents do not see this yet, but the reaction is such. in my opinion, world war ii. still going on and now many do not move the desire to take revenge. this is especially evident in my country and other eastern european countries that worked closely with the nazis during world war ii. today, these countries want to

avenge their defeat. western politicians will soon see this too, but for now they are doing just that. what is said about the territorial integrity of ukraine, the integrity of the soviet union guaranteed by agreements what is the territorial the unity of the federal state was broken and now i'm talking not only in the soviet union but also the collapse of the yugoslavs, the former subjects now exist as an independent state. at the same time, i'm not talking about the right to self-determination, enshrined in the un charter, it's quite different. i am completely with you. agree. here is mr. giovanna how did it happen that the sanctions, which, according to

western leaders, were primarily to destroy the russian economy. as a result, the european union was hit so hard . who do you think made a mistake? european authorities the union made many mistakes. it's still too early to say for sure. who is the winner. and who are the losers? personally, i still clearly see two winners and two losers the first winners are, of course, nato and the usa now no one will agree that we are seeing nato brain deaths as a few years, and then a few months ago, french president emmanuel macron put it nato today and the united states is once again firmly on its feet, the second, winner, ukrainian nationalism 10 years ago. i myself came to ukraine

and then he would not have been able to say exactly what the ukrainian nation is. today, the ukrainians received a gift from russia, they have a common enemy. according to carl schmitt, when you have a common enemy , it leads to political cohesion. namely, this is what we are seeing today in ukraine, a nation is being born before our eyes, as for the losers, the first of them can be called the european union and for the reverse effect of sanctions, which manifests itself in the energy food crisis of inflation and so on, the second, the losing side is developing, strange, about which we often forget. if europeans find it difficult to cope with the energy food crisis, then for the inhabitants of those countries the consequences are simply terrible, especially the difficult situation in africa south of the mediterranean sea. we must not forget this. of course, we sincerely regret the thousands of young people who died in ukraine, both from russia and from ukraine, but no one remembers the

millions of people in the eastern gong dying in terrible conditions. note that 2020 is the second year became a year of testing for the entire european union social economic energy crisis. since the eurozone crisis in 2009, europe has not had time to rest from the coming problems of the brexit refugee influx and the coronavirus pandemic. all this drove the europeans into an economic hole. however, only now the european union is faced with an unprecedented crisis, which has turned a large international union into fragmented countries that are trying to cope with the consequences of earlier decisions, the biggest crisis. especially with the arrival of winter. the cost of gas and

electricity utilities in europe has always been expensive. however, over the past year, prices have become literally cosmic utility bills. almost tripled from 300 euros to almost 1.000 to make yourself a cup of tea. i have used the microwave before. and now i'm pouring water into an electric coffee maker. she consumes less high as well instead of taking a bath every day. i wash twice a week in the shower. the rest of the days in the shell suffered and the european russian industry deficit. gaza has become fatal in greece, gins and spinning mills worry about their future in an unstable energy environment. enterprises were forced to cut production as orders from customers fell under threat and there is no staff, there is nowhere to take orders and salaries , our customers are now very worried because they see a serious lack of sales in stores, which these days reaches 50% of customers are also worried about whether they can save

their plants in the face of natural gas shortages is another painful topic. for europeans. fuel its cost is steadily rising one of the most dire situations in hungary local gas station owners are struggling to survive. a catastrophe is brewing after the government announced it would cut off the supply of diesel and gasoline for sale as a result of about 400 filling stations being closed. these stations will run as long as they can, but when they close, the agricultural industry will the problems of the crisis have also affected healthcare and high energy prices have hit many european clinics, for example in germany according to the local federation of hospitals, the cost of electricity and gas has increased 10 times over the year and amounts to an average of 6 million euros unsupportable sumy eats up almost the entire budget of medical institutions . many have been threatened with closure, we are very affected by growth. the hospital is in a difficult

economic situation as theoretically we are trying to cope with costs and starting from the beginning this year. and the most difficult situation, perhaps, has developed in the uk brexit, the actions of the government and the economic crisis have made britain a new sick man in europe , the kingdom, and could not recover from the three blows received at the beginning of the 21st century. as a result, the uk has lagged behind other rich countries, its population is poorer at a record pace, and inflation exceeds 11%, the british are increasingly less willing to put up with the fall. chodov and increasingly resorting to at least strikes are now protesting, literally all who can doctors teachers, postal drivers, civil servants firefighters poor people really need help because all the things they buy become more expensive, i have a daughter. she has gas and electricity and she has to choose. it cannot use this and that, according to the forecasts of many experts. the era of

crises for the european union will last for several more years, we see that the primitive stamping of homeless package economic sanctions against belarus by the collective west against russia begins to subside. everything, that could be banned and limited. even if our partners have already done themselves during our time. now it's time for them to realize and evaluate the consequences of the word about energy food crises. already sound with all three to suppose soon in individual countries. to these two crises, a third political symptom may be added to the face of internal critical assessments, primarily from the population and business, in a number of western countries

are heard louder and louder. statement almost about the economic collapse in our countries resigned sober judgments by observers of analysts of individual politicians that the sanctions hit the initiators themselves much more. now we will discuss with you all the topics of questions lived, mentioned called western unity in the face of crisis. but if you take a closer look at this concept , it will become clear that at the end of this year, relations between the us and the eu have become very aggravated, especially with regard to the well-known law to reduce inflation developed. uh, as my colleague already

mentioned. now there's a kind of atmosphere as a result of the war, european countries began to rely heavily on the support of the united states, which will help us like big brother. because of this, the eu is now heavily dependent on the united states, the leadership of the european union is even paying an absolutely unjustified price, given that economically we are now in the position of losing germany's sniper balance for the first time since world war ii has become negative and for us. this is a serious problem. after all, our entire economic model is based on exports. industrial products. our enterprises are under the threat of a critical crisis, food inflation. exceeded 10% now it is almost 15% these are all serious

problems. however, the media is not political. they do not raise the question of the expediency of supporting the war , moreover, they are sending more and more tanks to the eastern front instead of stopping the war western politicians and the media have recreated the atmosphere of the cold war and now declare that they are ready to pay for it at the same time opposition politicians, including i remember that in the end it is ordinary people who pay the price for a war that no one needs for someone else's war, so the ordinary game sees more and more clearly that it is they who have to pay. and that time as authorities, just want to feel the moral superiority. we do not agree that people should pay. they must take care of themselves, their families and children in their earnings and in the future, our

political decisions must lead to an end to the war. after all, its continuation will cost too much. unfortunately, the eu leadership various media we are convinced that european countries need to stick together, that we are in a state of cold water, and we must sacrifice something. from her , i perfectly understand that ukrainians have to pay dearly for their ambitions. however. i ask a question. why is this for europeans? after all, many understand that the main beneficiary. the result is the united states of america of german politicians. now the concern is the desire to be morally superior to others, if you look at politicians, most of them , uh, come from the middle class, which never faced with the poverty of the university. they studied anything related to politics, like the political science of gender studies or something like that. after that, they immediately got into the

political space in this way. they never faced economic responsibility. they have never been in business and all they care about is the desire to be morally superior to others, how good they really believe in the values ​​\u200b\u200bimposed on us with a smell in an economy focused on these values ​​that the fight against climate change is our main task. when you believe moral superiority. they are for economic benefit and even consider it immoral, then you accept. no, the leadership in brussels now we see that the behavior of politicians in brussels is contrary to the concept of homo micus instead of him. we have huma, moralicus, like during the french revolution with the jacobins, i agree with you, and i agree with you

because politicians are guided by the wrong morals, because, in my opinion, antimoral radio does not take into account the interests of ordinary citizens. we are seeing dire consequences. however, my colleagues here as well journalists from major media outlets are convinced that sanctions on the supply of weapons to prolong the war are morally justified. you know, but i can't help but discuss with you international concerns about the war in ukraine i still can't understand why an organization in june, founded after world war ii to prevent new conflicts, is now engaged in warmongering. they take the initiative to stop it. everyone

expected europe to take whatever steps were necessary to achieve peace. they will become the main what do you think is a supporter of the war? on this subject, tatyana, you cannot help but notice that sometimes european politicians do not even try to find ways to peacefully resolve the conflict. obschezhitinsky know very many have heard about plans, life threatens with an iron curtain that would stretch from the baltic sea to the black and caspian seas . he wanted to use the six countries that are now part of the eastern partnership, as well as the baltic country, to divide europe from

lisbon to the urals or even to vladivostok came to the european parliament. what would enable us to develop a strong economy? resources and western technology do not want the execution of this scenario do not want to see a close relationship within our continent. they spread hatred towards russia, and poland became a tool in the hands of moving in one

direction. this direction has changed misha zhivan, well, do you agree that ukraine for a long time had a chance to become a bridge between the west in general and the european union in particular and russia that later, unfortunately, the ukrainian authorities, especially after the presidency of petro poroshenko, they decided to become the main enemy of russia in something like an anti-russian government. do you see a way to

end this war, given that in ukraine now, to my great regret, no one is considering options for a peaceful resolution of the current situation. perhaps the european leader should talk with the authorities of ukraine on this topic for a million dollars. i wish i knew. it is not known that until recently so many people here in the european parliament were talking for days on end about peace and peaceful settlement of conflicts, and now they are doing everything in full. that they are discussing weapons, new wars and new victims. secondly, it is surprising that people talk all day about human rights, but at the same time they completely deny the rights of russian-speaking minorities. of course, i

respect human rights and fully support the right to self-determination. however, what is applicable to people all over the world should be applicable to people in the crimea or in the donbass as well as to russian substances in some states in eastern europe i do not have a solution for a peaceful settlement of the conflict, but i have to note that the minsk agreements no longer apply at all. the main question today should sound like how to ensure the peace process so that there are no winners and losers, we need to make sure that neither russia nor ukraine are left as losers. this is a difficult question, which was answered by john f. kennedy during the cuban missile crisis in the early sixties, john f. kennedy ordered the military departments. in this crisis. no winners or losers and

the soviet union and the united states won. after all , we kept the peace this is how the european union should act now from me. this is not often heard, but i agree with the president of france macron, who said that russia will not leave on its own and will defend the employed. it is necessary to start a dialogue with russia and respect the russian -speaking minority in other countries. it is in this way that peace can be achieved, especially considering that now the threat of world conflict is growing day by day, we are in a very dangerous position. situation. it's out of control now,

while the eu and the us support the war. i am very sad to admit that there are people who will be happy to fight to the last ukrainian. but i can’t help but note that now it’s only 19 ° maximilian in the building of the european parliament, it’s pretty cool here, but as i understand it, according to european officials. the fact that civil servants deputies have to freeze. this, in their opinion , helps ukraine but being a ukrainian. i want to emphasize that the provision of peace negotiations. as mister jovan said it would be better to help you need to understand how politics is conceived. they will tell you that there is a law according to which ukraine has its own territory, and according to which ukraine has

the right to regain its lost territory, but personally, i am not sure that if we conduct a survey in ukraine, the majority will vote for the continuation of the war and the date moment. until the territories are returned they are for the recognition of the current line. whether the front. kochneknya, perhaps the inhabitants of kharkov or the dnieper would prefer to recognize the current the front line of the ceasefire line, but now it is impossible to hear the opinion of ordinary ukrainians. we hear here only the voices of the leaders of the parties. of course. this is a war not only between ukraine and russia, but also between the west and russia, and also between go and western unipolarity, according to which western countries will determine what political course other

states should choose and ideas of multipolarity, according to which each superpower has its own sphere , the impact can be found arguments. there are a huge number of wars in the world now war in yemen war in africa wars all over the world and i can see that none of my colleagues care about them. the reason why everyone is paying so much attention to the war between russia and ukraine is that this war is not just between russia and ukraine, but a war that will determine the mine order for the next 10-15 years. this is a war with the world order. and when we are at war with the world order, i am sorry to say such things to ukrainians in this situation and the fate of the dairy is of interest. it's true, mr. joan, what do you think of russia as a scapegoat

energy crisis food crisis and so on all the crimes of russia is an easy way out. i agree with maximilian that the war in ukraine is indeed very important. however, there is much more attention for chairman xi jinping to saudi arabia. if an alliance arises between saudi arabia and china, in which oil is paid in yuan or another currency, they are in us dollars, then this will be a serious shift in the global balance of power, on my opinion is maximilian, share my concern regarding the fact that we are so obsessed with large-scale western propaganda of the war in ukraine that we have forgotten the next world is not subject to care. we agree with you that the war between ukraine and

russia or nato and russia occupies an important place in the world. but more importantly, perhaps the war between the west and the rest of the world in the east is home to about two-thirds or even three-quarters of the world's population. so it is worth paying attention to the positions of india and indonesia, and of course, the subtle game of turkey in the game of toki complex, according to tatyana but now we hear very aggressive rhetoric from the polish government. we also know how tense relations have developed between the belarusian and polish authorities today in order to be strong it is necessary to have an army of good weapons. this is the main thing and there is only

one option. not to prevent the war, but to be ready for it against both major resolutions on russia because it was written there, another supply of weapons to ukraine coming back toma. never run out of your previous thoughts. it's only the revenge of certain political forces and players for the defeat in world war ii have a significant impact with hitler , the baltic diaspora, including latvian, which were

associated with hitler of world war ii, all jews were subject to destruction; today, in their place, russians were responsible for many atrocities, but not it is worth forgetting that russians as a large ethnic group were forcibly separated after the collapse of the soviet union, at least russian-speaking people now live in the european union, while while their total number around the world is about 25 million. many of them traditionally live in the same territory, for example, the eastern

part of latvia, and religion can be put on a par with such phenomena. like islamov present and the donut come, who is not interested in whether these russians are putin or the opposition at the rain tv channel, this is an opposition tv channel that existed and worked in russia for more than three years, and in latvia lasted only 3 months the channel was deprived of a license for some words journalist who subjected censored authorities said that they sound too positive towards putin and that it is

unacceptable to talk more, because this year ukraine became a candidate for joining the european union. despite the fact that for many years she was denied this. including because of the existing problems in the field of democracy and human rights, however , in today's ukraine, some of these problems have significantly worsened, for example, criticizing the actions of the official authorities. the media were banned russian language languages ​​of other minorities the leader of the position, viktor medvedchuk , who speaks for peace, was first detained for many months, and later completely expelled from the country. even some pro-european opposition politicians are forced to flee the country, nevertheless, the leadership of the european union decided to

ignore all these facts and proclaim kiev as a model of european values, but do n’t you think that something is wrong with these values ​​today, of course, look who becomes the first casualty of the war, really. yes, we know what we are talking about, and if you go to any eu institution today, then of my colleagues visited ukraine before the current crisis. i personally was there so i know what i'm talking about, in general, it seems to me that there will not even be ten percent of such people. and now they are joining the general trend and repeating the phenomena that there is a war going on now and that in this war we are on the side of good, they are told that ukraine, as a western democratic liberal country , supports lgbtq plus communities, and within these

walls a lot of attention is paid to this. ukraine appears as such shining on a hill in the middle of eastern europe and on the other side gloomy homophobic repressive authoritarian mordor mired in corruption by sauron himself sitting in the kremlin minal why convinces people to support sanctions and the supply of new weapons to the eastern front and since ukraine is that most shining city, then it will be gladly accepted into europe such propaganda has its consequences at the same time, the admission of ukraine uh to the eu may become one of the conditions if we want to achieve a truce situation in which both sides remain victorious, it is quite obvious that russia will never will not give up crimea, it is also obvious that russia can not give up donetsk by the roman canal.

no, now i'm not talking about the legal side of the issue , what she will receive in return, in order to also be able to consider herself the winning side and eu membership could be such a prize. we seem to be saying, yes, you have actually lost control over a quarter of your territory, if i have to choose between the admission of ukraine to nato and the admission of ukraine to the european union, then i will definitely choose the second option, as russia needs buffer zone. we are in the european parliament. we are almost ready to give the green light to the

eu accession of albania, north macedonia, herzegovina , possibly serbia and other countries, so why not add ukraine to this list. the difficulty is that if we want to achieve peace, then how do we make sure that both sides felt like winners. if we accept that russia retains control over some of those territories, what about? of course uh, can't be mentioned here often voiced washington, then what will ukraine get in return for the parties, there are

funds left for ukraine. i'm talking about respect for the territorial integrity of national minorities and so on. you see, in our words, we remind emmanuel macron more and more. what is a problem both for him and for me in relations between ukraine and the european union i spent this week in brussels . of course, i saw the results of the football match between spain and moroka. and it was so awful frightening. it was not scary to leave the hotel, because that i watched how migrants from morocco behaved like they did or forged what clashes with the police were, i almost forgot i also met

an elderly man from france who was shocked by what was happening, who told me this was not my group. we have lost the game in hand and this is the opinion of ordinary residents and vrupa. don't you think that officials. from the european parliament ignore the opinion of ordinary europeans, as a key issue. virus at least we call it a virus the western world has moved away from its historical cultural heritage. and, of course, these approaches lowered. from the tops of the ivory towers they come up with all sorts of crazy theories like the idea of ​​the french figures derida and foucault, they tell

us that there is no such thing as identity or the nature of things? what can make the world like this? how do you want it to be, that there is no moral responsibility to the ancestors or the nation of leftist ideas infected by the day the european union turns into shit. of course , this question concerns the relationship between political elites and ordinary citizens. and if you ask an ordinary worker in a factory. uh, then you won't hear support or ideas from him. well, as far as the

middle class is concerned, everything is not so obvious, really. there are people who vote for the left, especially for green big cities. they can even make up the majority of votes, of course, this topic is related to the war between russia and ukraine in the way that russia and hungary are louder with it. everyone speaks out against this wave. that is why it is so easy for politicians to portray russia from a scrap of flesh, they can simply say that russia against their liberal fantastic brave new world a. now she has also invaded the wonderful liberal tolerant ukraine, which means that she needs to be fought, and thus there is really a moral aspect in this war, they are really fighting for the opportunity to lead a liberal policy to live with open borders

for everyone, and so on. however, first of all. this is a problem. there is no democracy, but western politicians in business and economics support russia for us russia is a place where culture remains. and steels is a monster and we are now faced with problems, as politicians of views we sympathize with russia, but at the same time our countries are de facto at war to pay attention to the relationship that has developed over the past few years between the european union and

the republic of belarus with more details in our story. diplomatic relations between belarus and the european union were established in august 1992. during their development, they were characterized by both periods of activation and significant cooling positive developments took place in 2016, at that time a coordination group of belarus was established with a dialogue across the spectrum of bilateral interaction between minsk and brussels in the future as part of the intensification of political contacts between belarus and the eu. our country has been repeatedly visited by european commissioners. in 2020, relations cracked, the west once again refused to recognize the results of the presidential elections the european union imposed visa sanctions on a number of officials in belarus and the enterprise stopped cooperation in a number of areas under sanctions also hit belarusian exports of potash fertilizers and oil products. however, first of all. this hit the european union, many

european farmers in the sowing season were left without the most important fertilizer deficiency provoked growth. on them, while drought and abnormal heat jeopardized the entire future harvest in the eu, while the sanctions ricochet west did not stop their own ambitions turned out to be much more important than the well-being of the people there. i am waiting for the adoption of decisive measures, to tighten the males against belarus is absolutely necessary, because what is happening in belarus is still a tragedy, and we must act decisively in response to the unfriendly actions of the european union belarus was forced. suspend your participation in the eastern partnership. this initiative included cross-border cooperation. border infrastructure renovation repairs, green technologies and small business and educational projects. at the same time, thanks to the assistance of belarus to establish peace. unique minsk agreements were created in ukraine after the start of the military conflict in ukraine, minsk repeatedly called on the parties to return to them and sit down at the table. negotiation. everyone themselves wants to fight the

latter, not only ukrainians, too, there is a pole. what are mercenaries? well, it's their business, it's their right. bye. for example, i and our special services do not see that they are ready for full-fledged negotiations to negotiate in a human way. they see, in our opinion, how to continue the war. however, ukraine did not need peace, according to the ex-president of the country, petro poroshenko, the minsk agreements were needed to buy time and strengthen the combat capability of the ukrainian army. with the support of nato, we didn’t want war and don’t want it, but it ’s good that they watched it quite recently, that president poroshenko spoke out. why did he need a mix of these negotiations and so on. it turns out he was preparing for war. well, something before us will be accused that we are to blame for something, well, the planet was preparing for today, they don’t clear up this situation, the other day

, ex-chancellor of germany angela merkel in the inter deutsche gazeta website also admitted that in 2014 the conflict was suspended , but the problem remained unresolved, the minsk agreements were an attempt to give kiev time for these 8 years. ukraine was able to strengthen its potential ukraine 2014-2015 is not ukraine today at the beginning of 2015. putin could easily capture them. and i very much doubt that at that time the nato countries could do as much as they are doing now to help ukraine, it was clear to all of us that this was a frozen conflict, that the problem had not been resolved, but that was precisely what gave ukraine precious time. if it were so, as she says. the way it is, in fact, it's not just disgusting. this vile president of russia

said this, he did not expect such an attack, and the tanks of the world. she acted rudely. she wants to be in trend with the minsk agreements and poroshenko's position that, well, they have finally made a move. the war stopped, people died. all this is positively assessed and today, against that background, talking about the fact that they are with poroshenko well, consider this, olund,

whom she led by the hand in front of my eyes. they allegedly deceived the landing operation, there are all putin and everyone in the world, and so on, a pause of opportunity prepare the ukrainian army for this war. if that were the case, that would be too much. just know, that's deceived prepared for war now. if this is so, it is not so, but if it is true that there is a war going on, you were preparing for it, and we know for sure that putin said in the near future, we will publish these as they should have been after the twentieth year of the rebellion in belarus, if it develops the situation and go to the border of the smolensk region, the starting bench will be seized. we have started a war against russia from the donbass, the reasons must be listened to

the fact that russia seized foreign territories there was to start a war in the xxi may twenty- second year. russia worked ahead of the curve, so there is no need to touch russia, in general, merkel’s poroshenko’s statement is already a statement that russia started the war, they are their marks and poroshenko wants to seem their importance. uh, the ukrainian army. see fighting resists. the strongest of the strongest armies in the world, because we deceived everyone in minsk and the world without being deceived, and russia and so on small and vile does not look like measurements it is not true that they did this in order to deceive everything was serious, then it was already possible by this time, if they went, in the way that putin proposed and the agreement was concluded today. uh, except for the climate. ukraine was integral, there was no war,

there was no official representative of the russian foreign ministry, maria zakharova, merkel's words confirm that the european union was not originally going to fulfill the peace agreements in these revelations. it sounded. the main thing was everything from the point of view. the west is just a falsification. it was flirting with using international law. pumping up armaments alone dr. zhdanov the leadership of the european union has aggravated the already tense relationship with the republic, belarus is sure. you understand that, at the same time, officials in brussels

are ignoring the economic consequences for europe that such a policy could lead to, as well as the role that minsk has played in the past in resolving the current conflict. we already talked about the agreement today. what do you think, if the chance that next year brussels will choose a path more constructive dialogue, or still you should not count on improving relations between the european union and the republic. european countries relations will only be exacerbated by the double standards of the eastern partnership. belarus was not included in it here is the pretext that lukashenka is

europe's last dictator vladimir putin in the political game.

yes, therefore, regrettably, but we do not see any desire to destroy this wall and politics now really boiled down to dividing the world into white black as you told them maximilian in life is not like that, there is no such thing that some are absolutely good, while others are absolutely bad. let me say that i have voted more than once in recent years for the european union to have two bridges with russia, the first should be maldova, its former president igor dodon, and the second belarus is now western propaganda and western politicians are making an enemy out of belarus, wondering question. will belarus eventually unite with russia, i am sad about this, since belarus

was an ideal bridge between eastern europe and asia on one side and western europe on the other. at the same time, unfortunately, we have lost a lot of opportunities for building bridges. we only burned the ones that were and now i repeat we are in a very dangerous position where instead of bridges, war could become suitable bridges, as spain was once a bridge between latin america and the european union, we could focus on this positive example, considering how many russian-speaking people who understand russia live in our countries, however, going back to

our today. equally, there was indeed a hope for the creation of a bridge that would allow building economic cooperation and cultural exchange between western europe on the one hand and russia and the rest of the post-soviet countries on the other. and if this happened, europe would have gained greater political independence and more opportunities compared to the cold war period. she would be able to cooperate with both the east and the west. however, if we now return to the state of the cold war and building only new iron curtains, then we can have close ties. only with the stock of the united states, in fact, the european union turned out to be the loser, as we lost political prospects and now play the role of the us little brother in their global strategies. this is

a big loss for us and the people in brussels do not understand that we are losing opportunities they think in return. we get a lot in moral terms sooner or later, however, they realize that you will not be fed up with moral superiority. and that you won't close them holes in the economy, we will have to wait until this moment in order to change the political course, but for now we are in for a wave of stormy enthusiasm from the realization of moral superiority, for which everyone is ready to sacrifice both the country's economy and political opportunities. thank you very much. i am very grateful that they agreed to take part in our program, despite the current geopolitical context, and i understand that today such a decision requires serious political

courage from so many convictions. thank you again once at the end. i would like to remind our viewers of one wonderful quote by an american publicist. joseph daniels. the army is people gathered in one place for the sole purpose of correcting the mistakes of diplomats and politicians. i very much hope that smart diplomats and politicians from east and west will soon gather in some place to represent our societies and contribute to the fact that the mistakes of diplomats are resolved, but already without use. thank you very much it was. special project program very state out the european parliament

on december 14 i will tell you. i'm sergei lugovsky hello, the draft law of the entire belarusian people's assembly is at the finish line. how was the process of preparing the revision and