and you carefully okay, do not drive. not at all made up is the perfect guarantee. arthur you tear off a piece of me and give it back. watch the movie. let it be lisa on sunday.

they came to belarus from different parts of the world, and they have their own view of the country. i already live in belarus in the city of lida, the city of lida has become a very native city for me. i love him so much i was looking for him. in which country will i get a very good education and then learn about our university every day. everything is better and better better watch the project a look at belarus on our tv channel.

especially the release of the sasu program is authorized to declare from the heart of the european union from brussels i want to note that for the first time in the history of belarusian television. we are broadcasting the program from the studio of the press center of the european parliament, and a few steps away from me there is a voting hall, where key decisions are made

for the entire european union represents his country, it is with them that we will talk about the results of this difficult year for the entire european union as a whole and about a possible dialogue between states. i am very happy to welcome all of you to our studio and first. i would like to introduce our dear guests dr. maksimilyanov for the sake of a member of the european parliament. germany tatiana dr. tatiana is waiting for a member of the european parliament from latvia good evening and mr. ervezevan mep from france i am glad to see you. let's start here today. we'll ask you from the blitz polls answer with the most concise whether the leadership of the european union deserves a gift from santa claus this year, dr. faucet the leadership of the european union has never deserved a gift

from santa claus and 122, nothing has changed. because our politicians make decisions that are directed at themselves , at the world elites in general and at the elites in brussels in particular, they are at ordinary people, all politicians who ignore ordinary citizens and do not love them deserve not a gift, but rather a punishment. arkadyevna, so many mistakes have gone so far from reality that they turned out to be from it. then they sit in their towers and ivory and see nothing if the politicians, but they will still turn out, like everyone else

at christmas. so it's a funny question this question, because many europeans ask. how did it happen that the european union became the main victim of the sanctions war between the west and russia what do you think maximilian what went wrong politicians in the european union make decisions based on what they consider moral right. because of this, they are ready to sacrifice the economies of their countries in order to look good and feel the moral superiority of others , it is obvious to them that ukraine is the victim and the big russia in the neighborhood is the aggressor on the territory of another country. they believe that it is necessary to resist the game in solidarity with the victim, even if it has to pay a certain price, but

the price is of course paid by her leadership. eu is that the meeting says a brighter light than before? this is the time to lay down on the shoulders of the enterprise pensioners and all those who are now suffering from inflation, and the idea of ​​​​politicians is that now they can say, we will support ukraine and are ready to pay. e for our support. and i understand you, madam. and do you think this opinion is supported by all europeans or in society, after all, there is a split in the ussr, of course, society is split. here, you can even say that we are now witnessing a civil war on the european continent, but perhaps some people turn on politics. you even presidents don't see it. well, reality. such is the second world war. everything is still going on and

now many are not driven by the desire to take revenge, this is especially evident in my country. other countries in eastern europe who worked closely with the nazis during world war ii. today these countries want to avenge their defeat western politics will soon see it too, but so far they are doing nothing. what they say about the territorial integrity of ukraine and what they say about the territorial integrity of the soviet union guaranteed by the helsinki accords. that the territorial unity of the federal state was violated and now i'm talking not only in the soviet union but also the collapse of yugoslavia, the former subjects now exist as an independent state. at the same time, i am not talking about the right to self-determination enshrined in the charter. it is

quite different western leaders should have first of all destroyed the russian economy. the eu authorities have made many mistakes. however, it is still too early to say for sure. who is the winner. and who are the losers? personally, i still clearly see two winners and two losers, the first winners

are , of course, nato and the usa now the united states is once again firmly on its feet, the second, winner, ukrainian nationalism 10 years ago. i myself came to ukraine and then i would not have been able to say exactly what the ukrainian nation is. today lived ukrainians received a gift from russia they have a single enemy, according to karma, when you have a single marriage it leads to political cohesion. namely, this is what we are seeing today in ukraine, a nation is being born before our eyes, as for the losers, the first of them can be called the european union due to the reverse effect of sanctions, which manifests itself in the energy food crisis of inflation and so on, the second, the losing side - this is an evolving, strange, about, which we often forget, if europeans find it difficult to cope with energy food crisis, then for the inhabitants of those countries the consequences are simply terrible, especially the difficult

situation in africa south of the mediterranean sea. we must not forget this. of course, we sincerely regret the thousands of young people who died in ukraine, both from russia and from ukraine. well, no one remembers the millions of people in eastern congo dying in terrible conditions. to note that 2020 was the second year of testing for the entire european union in the social economic energy crisis. beginning with the eurozone crisis in 2009, europe did not have time to take a break from the upcoming problems, the influx of refugees in brexit and the coronavirus pandemic. all this drove the europeans into an economic hole. however, only now the european union is faced with

an unprecedented crisis, which has turned a large international union into fragmented countries that are trying to cope with the consequences of earlier decisions, the biggest crisis. especially with the arrival of winter. the cost of gas and electricity utilities in europe has always been expensive. however, over the past year, prices have become literally cosmic utility bills. almost tripled from 300 euros to almost 1.000 to make yourself a cup of tea. i have used the microwave before. and now i'm pouring water into an electric coffee maker. she consumes less and instead of taking a bath every day. i wash twice a week in the shower. the rest of the days in the sink suffered and the european industry was deficient in russian. gaza has become fatal in greece about its future worrying about the cotton gin and spinning mill in an unstable energy environment. businesses have been forced to cut production as orders from customers have fallen into jeopardy and there are no staff,

no orders to take and salaries our customers are now very worried because they see a serious lack of sales in stores, which these days reaches 50%. customers also worry about whether they can keep their plants alive in the face of natural gas shortages , another sore point. for europeans. fuel its cost is steadily growing one of the most hungary's dire situation, local gas station owners struggle to survive. a catastrophe is brewing after the government announced it would cut off the supply of diesel and gasoline for sale as a result of about 400 filling stations being closed. these stations will operate as long as they can, but when they close, the agricultural industry will have problems the crisis has also affected healthcare and high energy prices have hit many european clinics, for example in germany according to according to the local federation of hospitals, the cost of electricity and gas has increased 10 times over the year and

amounts to an average of 6 million euros. unbearable sumy eats up almost the entire budget of medical institutions. many have been threatened with closure, we are very affected by growth. tsen hospital is in a difficult economic situation as we are theoretically trying to cope with expenses starting from the beginning of this year. and the most difficult situation, perhaps, has developed in the uk brexit. government actions and the economic crisis made britain's new sick man of europe kingdom never recovered from the three blows it received at the start of the 21st century. as a result, the uk has lagged behind other rich countries, its population is getting poorer at a record pace, and inflation exceeds 11%, the british are less and less ready to put up with the fall. codes and increasingly resorting to at least strikes are now protesting, literally everyone who can - doctors, teachers, postal drivers, firefighters, civil servants poor people really need help, because all the things that

they buy become more expensive, i have a daughter. she has gas and electricity and she has to choose. it cannot use this and that, according to the forecasts of many experts. the era of crises for the european union will last for several more years, we see that the primitive churning out of homeless package economic sanctions against belarus by the collective west against russia is starting to falter. everything that could be banned and limited. even if our partners have already done it for themselves during our time. now it's time for them to realize and evaluate implications of the word about energy food crises. already sound with all the trumpeters to assume soon in individual countries. to these two crises,

a third political symptom may be added. internal critical assessments, primarily from the population and business in a number of western countries, were heard louder and louder. the statement about an almost economic collapse in our countries was reconciled by sober judgments by observers of analysts of individual politicians that the sanctions hit the initiators themselves much more. discuss all the topic of issues many times already mentioned, called western unity in the face of crisis. but if you take a closer look at this concept, it will become clear that at the end of this year, relations

between the us and the eu have become very aggravated, especially with regard to the well-known law to reduce inflation developed. as my colleague already mentioned. there is now a kind of atmosphere of war as a result of which european countries have begun to rely heavily on the support of the united states, which will help us like a big brother. because of this, the eu now the leadership of the european union is heavily dependent on the united states to pay an absolutely unjustified price, given that economically we are now in the position of the losers of germany in world war ii has become negative and for us. this is a serious problem. after all, our entire

economic model is based on the export of industrial products. our enterprises are under the threat of an energy crisis, food inflation. exceeded 10% now it is almost 15%. it's all serious problems. however, the media is not political. not questioning the wisdom of supporting the war , moreover, they are sending more and more tanks to the eastern front instead of stopping the war western politicians and media have recreated the atmosphere of the cold war and now claim that they are willing to pay for it at the same time opposition politicians, including remembers me that in the end, it is ordinary people who pay the price for a war that no one needs for someone else's war, so the usual game sees more and more clearly that it is they who have to pay them while they are in

power. just want to feel the moral high ground with what people have to pay. they must take care of themselves, their families and children in their earnings and in the future, our political decisions must lead to an end to the war. after all, its continuation will cost too much. unfortunately , the eu leadership is convinced by various media that the european countries need to stick together, that we are in a state of cold water, and we must sacrifice something. from her, i understand that ukrainians have to pay dearly for their ambitions. however. i ask a question. why is this for europeans? after all, many understand that the main beneficiary. the bottom line is the united states of america german politicians are now concerned about the desire to be morally superior to others, if you look at the politicians, most of them, er,

come from the middle class, who have never experienced poverty in the university. they studied anything related to politics, like the political science of gender studies or something like that. after that, they immediately got into political space in this way. they never faced economic responsibility. they have never been filmed by business and all they care about is the desire to be morally superior to others, how good they really believe we west values ​​in an economy focused on these values ​​in order to fight climate change is our main task when you believe in moral superiority. they are for economic benefit and even consider it immoral, then you accept. no, the leadership in brussels now we see that the behavior of politicians in brussels contradicts the concept of homakus instead. we

have godfather, moralicus, as during the french revolution i agree with the jacobins, i agree with you , and because politicians are guided by the wrong morality, even in my opinion, antimoral radio does not take into account the interests of ordinary citizens. we are seeing dire consequences. however, my colleagues here, as well as journalists from the major media, are convinced that sanctions on the supply of weapons to prolong the war are morally justified. you know, but i can not discuss with you international concern about the war in ukraine i still can not understand why the june organization, founded after the second world

war with the aim of preventing new conflicts, is now engaged in warmongering. they take the initiative to stop it. everyone expected europe to take whatever steps were necessary to achieve peace. they are the main supporters of the war, what do you think about this tatiana you can't help but notice that sometimes european politicians don't even try to find ways peaceful settlement of the conflict. you know very many have heard about the plans, life threatens with an iron curtain that would stretch from the baltic sea to the black and caspian seas . he wanted to use the six countries that are

now part of the eastern partnership, as well as the baltic countries, to divide europe from lisbon to the urals or even to vladivostok came to the european parliament of europe what would allow us to develop a strong economy? resources and western technologies do not want the execution of this scenario wish to see close relations within our continent. they spread hatred

towards russia, and poland became a tool around the hands moved in the same direction. this direction has changed the main tool. misha zhivan, do you agree that ukraine has long had a chance to give a bridge between the west in general, the european

union in particular and russia that later, unfortunately, the ukrainian authorities, especially after the presidency of petro poroshenko, decided to become the main enemy of russia in some way , like anti-russian government. do you see a way to end this war, given that in ukraine now, to my great regret, no one is considering options for a peaceful resolution of the current situation. perhaps the european leader should talk with the authorities of ukraine on this topic for a million dollars. i wish i knew. it is clear that until recently so many people here in the european parliament were talking for days on end about peace and the peaceful settlement of conflicts, and now they are doing everything they can. that they are discussing weapons, new wars and new victims.

secondly, it is surprising that people talk all day about human rights, but at the same time they completely deny the rights of russian-speaking minorities . of course, i respect human rights and fully support the right to self-determination. however, what is applicable to people all over the world should be applicable to people in crimea or donbass as well as russian-speaking substances in some states in eastern europe. doesn't work at all. the main question today should sound like how to ensure the peace process so that there are no winners and losers, we need to make sure that neither russia nor ukraine are left as losers. this is a difficult question, which was answered by john f. kennedy during the

caribbean crisis in the early sixties, john camedi gave the order to the military departments. in this crisis. there are no winners or losers, and the soviet union and the united states won. 'cause we kept the peace, that's how the european union should act now from me. this can not be heard often, but i agree with the president of france macron, who said that russia will not leave on its own and will defend the occupied territories. therefore, it is necessary to start a dialogue with russia and respect the russian-speaking minority in other countries. it is in this way that peace can be achieved,

especially considering that now the threat of world conflict is growing day by day, we are in a very dangerous situation. now out of control, meanwhile the eu and the us support war. i am very sad to admit that there are people who will be happy to fight to the last ukrainian. but i can’t help but note that now it’s only 19 ° maximilian in the building of the european parliament, it’s pretty cool here, but as i understand it, according to european officials. the fact that civil servants deputies have to freeze. this, in their opinion, helps ukraine but being a ukrainian. i want to emphasize that the provision of peace negotiations. as

mister jovan said it would be better to help you need to understand how politics is conceived. they get you they will increase that there is a law according to which ukraine has its own territory, and according to which ukraine has the right to regain its lost territory, but personally, i am not sure that if we hold questions in ukraine, then the majority will vote for the continuation of the war and the date of that moment until the territories are returned they are for the recognition of the current line. whether the front. kochneknya, perhaps the inhabitants of kharkiv or dnipro would prefer to recognize the current front line of the ceasefire line, but now it is impossible to hear the opinion of ordinary ukrainians. we hear here only the voices of the leaders of the parties. of course. this is a war not only between ukraine and russia, but also between the west and russia, as

well as between go and western unipolarity, according to which the western countries will determine which political course. you must choose other states and ideas, according to which each superpower has its own sphere, influence can be found arguments in support of both sides. there are a huge number of wars in the world now war in yemen war in africa wars around the world world and i see that none of my colleagues care about them. the reason why everyone is paying so much attention to the war between russia and ukraine is that this war is not just between russia and ukraine, but a war that will determine the world order for the next 10-15 years. this is a war with the world order. and when we are at war with the world order, then, uh,

i'm sorry, says such things to ukrainians in this situation, the fate of the dairy is interested, really, mr. joan, what do you think it's convenient to have russia as a scapegoat energy crisis food crisis and so on all the crimes of russia is an easy way out. i agree with maximilian that the war in ukraine is indeed very important. however, there is much more attention for chairman xi jinping to saudi arabia, if there is an alliance between saudi arabia and china, within which oil will be paid in yuan, yes, in a different currency, and not in us dollars, then this will be a serious shift in the global balance of power , in my opinion a maximilian, share my concern that

we are so obsessed with large-scale western propaganda of the war in ukraine that we have forgotten the next world is not subject to the west. we agree with you that the war between ukraine and russia or nato and russia occupies an important place in the world. but more importantly, perhaps the war between the west and the rest of the world in the east is home to about two-thirds or even three-quarters of the world's population. so it is worth paying attention to the positions of india and indonesia and of course turkey's subtle game of the game complex , according to tatiana, but now we hear very aggressive rhetoric from the polish government. we also know how

tense relations have developed between the belarusian and polish authorities and today, in order to be strong, it is necessary to have an army with good weapons - this is the main thing, and there is only one option not to prevent the war, but to be ready for it. because it was written there that another supply of weapons to ukraine was coming. back to my nights brings back your previous thoughts. this is just the revenge of certain political forces and players for the defeat in the second world war the huge ukrainian diaspora,

which were associated with hitler, the baltic diaspora, including the latvian one, which were associated with hitler, the european union and the united states of the second world war , all jews were subject to destruction today in their place were russians defoe, you say that russia as a state bears responsible for many atrocities, but do not forget that the russians as a large ethnic group were forcibly divided after the collapse of the soviet union at least russian-speaking people now live in the european union, while

their total number around the world is about 25 million. many of them traditionally live in the same territory, for example in the eastern part of latvia, and religions with phenomena such as islam phobia or anti-semitism. no one cares if these russians support putin or the opposition my country yesterday in the country from calling the license of the rain tv channel, this is an opposition tv channel that has existed and worked in russia for more than three years, and in latvia the channel lasted only 3 months

revoked the license for some words of a journalist who censored the authorities said that they sound too positive towards putin and that it is unacceptable to talk more, because this year ukraine became a candidate for joining the european union. despite the fact that for many years she was denied this. including due to the existing problems in the field of democracy and human rights, however , in today's ukraine, some of these problems have significantly worsened, for example, criticizing the actions of the official authorities. the media were the russian language and the languages ​​of other minorities are banned, the leader of the position, viktor medvedchuk , who speaks for peace, was first detained for many

months, and later completely expelled from the country. even some about european ones. opposition politicians are forced to flee the country, nevertheless, the leadership of the european union decided to ignore all these facts and proclaim kiev as a model of european values, but do n’t you think that something is wrong with these values ​​today, of course, look who becomes the first victim war, really. yes, it's a childish saying. we know what we're talking about. and if you go to any eu institution today, one of my colleagues visited ukraine before the current crisis. i personally was there so i know what i'm talking about, in general, it seems to me that there will not be 10% of such people. and now they are joining the general trend and repeating the

phenomena, that there is a war going on now and that in this war we are on the side of good, they are told that ukraine is a sucker democratic liberal country supports lgbtq plus communities, and within these walls a lot of attention is paid to this, ukraine appears as a shining grace on a hill in the middle of eastern europe and on the other side a gloomy homophobic repressive authoritarian dead in corruption mordor by sauron himself sitting in the kremlin minal convince people to support his sanctions and the supply of new weapons to the eastern front and since ukraine is the one the most shining city , then it will be gladly accepted into europe, such propaganda has its consequences, at the same time, the acceptance of ukraine, uh, can become one of the conditions if we want to achieve a truce of the situation, with

which both sides will remain victorious, it is quite obvious that russia will never give up crimea that russia cannot give up, donetsk is the same by the crimean channel. i am not talking now, not about the legal side of the issue, what she will receive in return, in order to also be able to consider herself the winning side and eu membership could be with such a prize. we seem to be saying, yes, you have actually lost control over a quarter of your territory if you don’t have to choose between accepting ukraine into nato or accepting ukraine into european union, then i will definitely choose the second

option, as russia needs a buffer zone. we are in the european parliament. we are almost ready to give the green light to the eu accession of albania, north macedonia, herzegovina, possibly serbia and other countries, so why not add ukraine to this list. the difficulty is that if we want to achieve restoration of peace, then how do we make felt like winners if we accept that russia retains control over some of those territories, about what? of course, uh, you can't mention it. here, washington often voices what then ukraine will receive in return for the parties for ukraine

. therefore, russia will remain safe. i'm talking about respect for the territorial integrity of national minorities and so on. you see, in our words, we remind emmanuel macron more and more. what is the problem, as for him, for me, the question is not entirely in relations between ukraine and the european union. i spent this week in brussels and of course i saw the results football match between spain and moroca. and it was so awful frightening. it was not scary to go outside the hotel, because i watched how

migrants from morocco behaved like they did or forged what clashes with the police were, i almost forgot i also met an elderly man from france who was shocked by what was happening, who told me this was not my group we lost europe is therefore the opinion of ordinary residents and in rupees. don't you think that officials. from the european parliament ignore the opinion of ordinary europeans as a key virus issues at least we call it a virus the western world has moved away from its historical cultural

heritage. and, of course, these approaches go down. from the tops of the ivory towers they come up with all sorts of crazy theories like the idea of ​​the french figures derida and foucault, they tell us that there is no such thing as identity or the nature of things? what can make the world like this? how do you want it to be, that there is no moral responsibility to the ancestors or the nation of leftist ideas infected by the day states and the european the union turns to shit, as for brussels, this city is really hit hard by this virus and money when morocco beat spain in football. of course, this question

concerns the relationship between political elites and ordinary citizens. and if you ask an ordinary worker in a factory. uh, then you won't hear support or ideas from him. well, as far as the middle class is concerned, everything is not so obvious, really. there are people who vote for the left, especially for green big cities. they can even make up the majority of the votes, of course, this topic is related to the war between russia and ukraine in a way that russia and hungary are louder with it. everyone speaks out against this wave. that is why it is so easy for politicians to portray russia as a fracture in the flesh. they can just say that russia is against their liberal fantastic brave new world a. now she has also invaded the wonderful liberal tolerant ukraine,

which means that she needs to be fought, and thus there is really a moral aspect in this war, they are really fighting for the opportunity to lead a liberal policy to live with open borders for all and so on. however, first of all. this is problem. there is no democracy, but western politicians in business and economics support russia for us russia is a place where culture remains traditional. and steels and we are now faced with a problem, as politicians of legal views, we sympathize with russia, but at the same time, our countries are de facto at war with it now. i would like to pay attention to the

relationships that have developed over the past several years between the european union and the republic, belarus is more detailed in our story. diplomatic relations between belarus and the european union were established in august 1992. during their development, they were characterized by both periods of activation and cooling, significant positive changes occurred in 2016, at that time a coordination group of belarus was established with a dialogue across the entire spectrum of bilateral interaction between minsk and brussels in the future as part of the intensification of political contacts between belarus and the eu, our country repeatedly visited by european commissioners. in 2020, relations cracked, the west once again refused to recognize the results of the presidential elections the european union imposed visa sanctions on a

number of belarusian officials and enterprises ceased cooperation in a number of areas, belarusian exports of potash fertilizers and oil products also fell under sanctions. however, for the first time in a queue. this hit the european union, many european farmers in the sowing season were left without the most important fertilizer. the shortage triggered a rise in prices on them, and drought and abnormal heat jeopardized the entire future harvest in the eu, while the sanctions ricochet west did not stop. actually , ambitions turned out to be much more important than the well-being of the people, there is impatience. i am waiting for decisive measures to be taken, it is absolutely necessary to toughen sanctions against belarus, because what is happening in belarus is still a tragedy, and we must act decisively in response to the unfriendly actions of the european union belarus was forced. suspend your participation in the eastern partnership. this is an initiative included cross-border cooperation repair and renovation of border infrastructure, green technologies and small business and educational

projects. at the same time, thanks to the assistance of belarus to establish peace. in ukraine, unique minsk agreements were created after the start of the military conflict. in ukraine, minsk has repeatedly called on the parties to return to them and sit down at the negotiating table of the last total ukraine is it not already there a pole or what mercenaries? well, that's their business. it's their right, for now. for example, i and our special services do not they see that they are ready for full-fledged negotiations to negotiate in a human way does not see. they see, in our opinion, how to continue the war. however, ukraine did not need peace, according to the ex-president of the country, petro poroshenko, the minsk agreements were needed to buy time and strengthen the combat capability of the ukrainian army. with the support of nato, it’s not you, it’s not us who didn’t want war and don’t want it, but it’s good that they were watching just recently, that president poroshenko spoke out. why did he

need a myth? with these negotiations and so on. it turns out that he was preparing for war, then something will be blamed before us. just that we are to blame for something, well, which is not being disentangled today. e this situation the other day exchancellor. mr. angela merkel , in an interview with the german newspaper zeid, also admitted that in 2014 the conflict was suspended, but the problem itself remained unresolved, the minsk agreements were an attempt to give kiev time for these 8 years. ukraine was able to strengthen its potential ukraine 2014-2015 is not ukraine today at the beginning of 2015 . putin could easily capture them. and i very i doubt that at that time the nato countries could have done as much as they are doing now to help ukraine , it was clear to all of us that this was a frozen conflict, that the problem had not been resolved, but this is precisely what gave ukraine precious time. if that were the case, as she says, it's disgusting. but it's not.

only as it is, in fact, it's not just disgusting. this is a vile merkel. i didn’t expect this either. the president of russia said this, he didn’t expect such a payment, and she acted petty disgustingly. she wants to be in trend nasty agreements and there is no position, some others, including poroshenko, about what they finally did.

today, against that background, to talk about the fact that they are with poroshenko well, consider this one, old whom she led by the hand in front of my eyes. they allegedly led a covert operation deceived. there, all uh, with all putin's russia and all the world, etc. pause the possibility of the ukrainian army preparing for this war. if that were the case, that would be too much. you just know, they deceived prepared for war and are fighting now. well, if this is so, it is not so, but if so , something is to come out, that there is a war going on, you are going to it prepared, and we know for sure in the near future, putin said, we will publish these as they should have been after the twentieth year of the rebellion in belarus, if

the situation develops and they go out on the border of the smolensk region, the starting ones from the stone will seize power to start a war against russia from the donbass, the reasons should listen then that russia captured strangers there was to start a war in 21 may twenty-two. russia worked ahead of the curve, so there is no need for russia to involve poroshenko merkel's statement into force already in the statement, that russia started the war. they are their merkel and poroshenko want to show their importance. uh, the ukrainian army. see one. he writes the strongest armies of the world, because we then deceived everyone in minsk and the world without deceived russia, and so on, a small and vile lie that doesn’t look like measurements, that they did this in order to deceive everything was

serious, then it was already possible this time. if they went the way that putin offered and the treaty, maybe he is today, uh, except for the climate, ukraine would be integral, there would be no war was, according to russian foreign ministry spokeswoman maria zakharova, merkel's words confirms that the eu was not originally going to implement the peace agreements in these revelations. it sounded. the main thing was everything from the point of view. the west is just a falsification. it was flirting with the use of international law. with the sole purpose of pumping up the kiev regime with weapons doctor machine, this year the leadership of the european union has aggravated

the already tense relationship with the republic, belarus is sure. you understand that along with this officials in brussels are ignorant of the economic consequences for europe that such a policy could bring, as well as the role that minsk has played in the past in resolving the current conflict, we already spoke today in the minsk agreements. what do you think, if there is a chance that next year brussels will choose the path of a more constructive dialogue, or still you should not count on improving relations between the european union and the republics of the elite governments in european countries, relations will worsen after we observe double

eastern partnership standards. belarus was not included in it. here is the pretext that lukashenka is the last dictator of europe, vladimir putin, in the political game, when minsk decided to take a lot of vector politics. good

countries yes, therefore, regrettably, but we do not see any desire to destroy this wall of misunderstanding. uh, indeed, and politics now really boiled down to the division of the world into white blacks. as you told them maxim liang, in life everything is not so, it does not happen that some are absolutely good, while others are absolutely bad. let me say that i have never voted in recent years for the european union to have two bridges with russia, the first should be maldova, its former president igor dodon, and the second belarus is now western propaganda and western

politicians are making an enemy out of belarus, wondering question. whether belarus eventually unites with russia makes me sad because belarus was an ideal bridge between eastern europe and asia on the one hand and western europe on the other. at the moment, unfortunately, we have lost a lot of opportunities to build bridges. we only burned the ones that were and now i repeat we are in a very dangerous position where instead of bridges, war could become suitable bridges, as spain was once a bridge between latin america and the european union, we could focus on this positive example, considering how many russian-speaking people who understand russia live

in our countries, however, it is happening back in our today. equally, there really was hope for a bridge that would allowed to build economic cooperation and ensure cultural exchange between western europe on the one hand and russia and other post-soviet countries on the other. and if this happened, europe would have gained greater political independence and more opportunities compared to the cold war period. she would be able to cooperate with both the east and the west. however, if we are now returning to the state of the cold war and building only new iron curtains, then we can only have close ties with the west, the united states, in fact,

the european union turned out to be the loser, as we lost political prospects and now play the role of the younger brother of the united states in their global strategies. this is a big loss for us and the people in brussels do not understand that we are losing opportunities they think in return. we get a lot in moral terms sooner or later, however, they realize that you will not be fed up with moral superiority. and that they will not close the holes in the economy, we will have to wait until this moment to change the political course, but for now a wave of stormy enthusiasm awaits us from the realization of moral superiority, for which everyone is ready to sacrifice, both the country's economy and political opportunities.