peisky, partners m-m call russia a terrorist country. that is, in fact, we understand that it was a systematic work and no one hides the goals. yes, of course, the goals, that is, they are open, and they naturally communicate, and in their national security concepts and strategies it is already clearly stated that the russian federation, that is, is one of the main threats directly to them. naturally, the entire war machine that they form is aimed at counteraction. here is this threat, while we we know that they have nato countries, uh. uh, they are the main type of hostilities. that is, it is an attack. although they position that the nato bloc is a defensive bloc. yes, but they clearly state in the concepts of national security what they should do? that is, yes, these threats, if we consider ukraine, our southern border that,

of course, every military conflict that occurs near the borders of the state carries a certain danger, but in this case, those measures that have been taken in the state of the military area, they level the armed forces of the republic of belarus are not intended not to conduct successful military operations. they are designed to keep the peace and at the same time, and we are constantly increasing our level of mobilization and combat readiness , events are being held. this is a direct relationship. the higher our level of preparedness, the lower the risks of war directly on our territory. and all these new methods of form and methods of waging war, which are now uh hmm we are seeing, unfortunately in ukraine they are now in online. it's just that alekseevich is just being introduced into the combat training of our armed forces online. as you look at everything that is happening, you know, if you take the approach that the idea of ​​the

united states of america factory, great britain, uh, uses, it 's clear what they are considering. uh developments in terms of financial and economic goals, their main corporations. we see how uh sanctions led to the fact that the energy market in europe went to american corporations, we see how uh european industrial corporations make a decision to transfer their assets, companies, to the territory of the united states of america or to other more loyal zones, that is, it is clear that when we talk about sanctions against us in the vision of an armed conflict in the territories adjacent to us, they there, and naturally solve their purely, monetary cynical issues. and uh, of course, for them, what are we, what are ukrainians, what are russians? in principle, even

europeans are nothing important, uh, important, only one american will survive corporations in competition with the chinese or will not survive, we said that the strategic goal is the destruction of the chinese dash of chinese corporations and the destruction in terms of technology control of new knowledge. let's yes, yes, yes, yes, finish it, and yes, and therefore, when we say that uh, modern uh, nato troops are high-tech, and the fight, uh, everything, is at a high level. well, here, uh, you need to understand what u is in this confrontation. we have such technologies. we can talk a lot about that we are trying to introduce them, uh, methods of waging a struggle, but we ourselves also have such technologies, a question that should probably be raised and understood, because the confrontation is intensifying,

but let's move on, and this year there was such a new the concept of his special operation, and especially for our broadcast, the well-known russian journalist, presenter vladimir solovyov shared his vision of how it influenced not only the geographical context on russian society on the perception of allies and opponents. let's get straight now let's listen. i am sure that this is a deep awareness of the impossibility of continuing the thirty-year path of development, in which a number of questions came from the concept of entry. what is it called? sergey ivanovich kurginyan is a great, russian philosopher, now it became clear that we thought that we were entering the western world, and the western world saw us entering. naturally, what is it for the process of our digestion, so that we can be devoured therefore? we are by and large now.

we are reorganizing russia and this demarcation is taking place, when some go as volunteers and they storm artyomovsk and fight for the liberation of ukraine from nazism because of russia's right to exist, while others stormed upper lars and fight for grants and filings of those countries that traitors are buying up in batches. but this is extremely good. i would even say it helps. we are here inside to decide on ourselves, we are pushing you know in order to get out of graphite. the result is a diamond which , after cutting, becomes a diamond, it is necessary to act on high pressure and temperature. it has become such a high pressure and temperature, which zamorfnogo largely does not understand. now

the purpose of the society is to collect and forge and produce diamond, and then the state peasant must complete the cutting so that russia becomes a diamond. hope it works out. well, it is clear that in any situation you need to look for pluses and obviously this whole situation will somehow affect russian society, but let's look to the west , it is clear that one of the beneficiaries of the military confrontation. poland has undoubtedly been in ukraine for several years due to american patrons, followers of pilsudski's ideas, form a percussion fist. well, the military. i think they will agree with me, and uh, if earlier the poles had to pull by the ears, supposedly a threat from belarus, then we have excitement after the election. and we they need to intensify, then the immigration crisis, which we allegedly created ourselves, then at first our own, as if the task were made easier the

pentagon has increased its presence at nato’s eastern guns. but the poles want to use all this power for their own purposes their imperial ambitions, have not gone away and one of the attempts to implement them was just the same in 2020, when a is for nonsense. with a certain chance, not without their participation, they tried to set fire to the situation inside our country now, uh, a new opportunity, everything that he thinks, on this account, every belarusian alexander lukashenko has repeatedly voiced, which he did especially symbolically. this is near the walls of the brest fortress. there are very close to the poles, who could not help but hear. and i think that they are listening, watching, listening and watching, we are peaceful people, but don't even try with us. speak from a position of strength. in your dream to drive the slavs into a new slavery, which you call unrealizable globalism. but alas, nothing

has changed. belarus still stands like the indestructible brest fortress in the way of any enemy. all attempts to strangle make it so much stronger and inspire others in connection with this issue . uh, the poles and ukrainians hurried to tell the whole world that the rocket was russian supposedly attacked, and a nato member a full-scale war will almost begin, but everyone was besieged and cooled, and in this regard, ambitious warsaw will remember such confucius for its colleagues or will be forced to swallow it. well , first of all, i agree with you. that is, according to the

estimates of military experts. are the armed forces developing so actively that in three or four years it will be able to carry out independently? all military operations are carried out independently. in general, the war. this indicates that they have accepted. now budget military budget, according to 20 billion. they are expanding the geography of buying heavy weapons, that is, they are already buying. uh, their heavy tanks, uh, south korea well, they're coming. uh, direct deliveries concluded uh contracts for 500 rocket hall systems to fire hammers. this is a huge tremendous power. so poland is now one of the countries that has the most powerful armed forces. naturally. uh, the fall of this rocket is a provocation and these are provocations. they happen all the time. uh, they directly provoke russia for more. uh, aggressive action. we see these strikes on airfields as well. after all

if you take a strike on an airfield, then, and this can be considered as a strike on an object that could have a nuclear weapon, uh-huh and here, but of course there can be completely different consequences, this war and provocation can go differently. in general, hit. uh, for the fleet in sevastopol, all this is provocative such things, here, which want to increase the degree of direct escalation. we see how these tools are prepared again and again about this. they say that they are not going to go from wall to wall at once . they will form these detachments, which in the form of saboteurs will come across our territory, it won’t work out differently, and the first preservation for the russian federation and belarus is the best option to keep this zone of 28,000 square kilometers in the peace zone, for this we must try to have the opportunity,

the necessary capabilities of the military technical training of the population appropriate e, confrontation must see our training, but the population. it must be understood that no one from belarus is planning any from our side active actions, the task is to be strong enough so that they are afraid to come to us, including, of course. poland will be active from the court only if there is no one in russia to make a decision on the use of nuclear potential, that is, the first task, so that you understand what many eccentrics think too. well, what if russia loses? uh, it's okay, if we lose a lot, we immediately decide on a nuclear umbrella, already our army. unfortunately, e will not be able to fully resist nato troops and naturally. their task today is to destabilize the socio-political situation in russia to bring the situation to the fact that russia could not be this protective umbrella, including the republic, while we are watching closely. e.

we measure our every movement, information tanks go to the entrance, before the beginning of our block, one of these information tanks went to the studio of grigory azaryonok. gregory look cancer. but and how there all this is to be answered it is necessary to understand. we when we our civilization on february 24, we started our own. we left with with an open visor and said to this western world we mean, here we are and we thought that we would now shout beautiful. hooray, let's show our strength, and they are these tolerants, these genders are all mired, that the west is weak, that they will run away, leave, that they will run away, so they are so strong in front of us, but it turned out that all this is all this. uh, it’s all superficial, it’s all foam, and a terribly powerful and ideological strong militarily has opened up before us, a single strong one, so that nothing is said here, a single most powerful monster, who wants to destroy us. they themselves said that everything must be decided on the battlefield. they garden wash the jungle they have the whole world to control these

hegemonies. we will not give up. this is what they said, therefore, they will give their beloved, respectively, we need to be strong. and what does it mean to be strong right? not mobilization in terms of the military registration and enlistment office mobilization of the spirit mobilization television mobilization uh, that's all for the front, everything for the victory mobilization organization, which means, uh, in schools, universities, viewers listen differently anyway and who? till now think, here someone sits and thinks. and why at all? let's quietly deal with our issues, go only to work, not think about anything. why won't geopolitics give us this. here people need to understand will not let the point of no return passed on how to strengthen our alliances, we 'll talk in the next lesson. thank you very much for this conversation. don't go far, stay with us. our discussion with you in the studio of alena serova and dmitry bochkov. just a few minutes ago. we were talking about interaction between the military sphere and our main

ally of justice, for the sake of special problems of misunderstanding and disagreement over the years of cooperation between the belarusian and russian military , belarusians and russians were well aware that one day they would have to stand right behind and shoot back in the truest sense of the word. fortunately, it hasn't come to that yet. and yet, the president of belarus has repeatedly emphasized that the basis of our security is the strong economy of alexander lukashenko for many years, especially during periods of gas milk and other wars. i think everyone remembers very well, these misunderstandings constantly said that within the framework of the union state there should not be such incidents at all, otherwise. and what kind of integration, in principle, can we then talk about, but finally remove questions in this connection. our well-wishers helped. as they say, there would be no happiness, in general, the colossal sanctions pressure, which was obviously conceived against us somehow wounds in fact, not only did not

lead to the destruction of the economy, but became a kind of window of opportunity. yes, it takes effort. discipline and the right motivation to use the moment as a point of growth and judging by the economic results. in general, it turns out and, of course, this does not want it, the west, with its pressure, knocked out the old bricks from under the wheels of the belarusian-russian integration, and now the locomotive is picking up speed, a compromise solution has been found in all directions, union programs, cover and regulate macroeconomic industrial agrarian policy competition rules, single transport market. in general, everything about what. we have been talking for so long and could not implement it, which means the process of forming a single market for oil, gas and electricity. well , on november 4, 21, at a meeting of the supreme state council, the documents were signed by the head of state. let's see how it was. i see, uh, your signature on the decree is worth all the members of the state council, if you don't mind, i'll sign this one. but

we will answer all of them, not only me, nikolai leontyevich, i see you are present. in our hall, this is the director of the institute of sociology. tell me, please, from the point of view of hmm public opinion research. and how the attitude of belarusians towards russians has changed lately. those issues that our institute is pursuing. we are seeing a fairly steady trend towards an increase in the popularity of the idea of ​​a union state, an understanding of the need to continue integration processes, but with all this, we need to pay attention to one more thing. uh, the information, certain presented here on the slide, that u understands the expediency, the need to continue our good neighborly relations, nevertheless, the results of the study show that the belarusians clearly understand the need to maintain upholding and their own sovereignty, upholding their

positions in various spheres of society. and here, in particular, is one of those questions that was also raised at one of the recent events. e, in which i also participated in the frontier forum, and the union state. training, for example, of our scientific elite. should be done by us. we must train those people who will be like now and leaders. our public opinion and conductors of our ideas, therefore, here it is necessary , uh, to support this idea of ​​​​a reasonable harmonious combination of our domestic political interests and, of course, the understanding that only allied relations. at present, they are a fairly reliable guarantor of ensuring the national security of both our and the russian federation and the entire union state. in connection with this issue, peter from the point of view. m-m economic, probably, perhaps, somewhere political a year later, do we feel

effect from the signing of these programs, which we saw the head of the state fixed. let's remember how our ill-wishers said that against the backdrop of a special military operation, the loss of the ukrainian market. e powerful sanctions pressure from the collective west of our economy. how the gdp of our economy will collapse, almost by two-digit figures, that galloping inflation will overwhelm us, which we see in fact, in fact we see, and this year, a sharp reorientation of our e-exports, primarily in the russian federation to the countries of the eurasian economic union we see even not just a slowdown in inflation in recent months after the fundamental decisions taken by the president - deflation, that is, the return of the adjustment of these negative factors. and most importantly,

let's not forget. we revived those industries that were previously mothballed. they were not in demand, because we could not produce machine tools only for ourselves, in some, especially military areas, that is, uh, here, thanks to this situation, our allied our eurasian integration state in it turns out that in a new role it is a role, including the reindustrialization of import substitution, the restoration and expansion of those scientific and technological industrial competencies that we have been talking about, i will remind you for decades. this is the belarusian integration scenario. including the protection of the sovereignty of independence, our export -oriented economy. okay. this is what the president said. that's what the image is good for, that it immediately makes it clear, here's the whole picture to look at revitalization of the circulatory system. yes. after all, this implies that then in the economic union

you need to think not only about the economy, because the circulatory system is different from other systems in the body. yes, as you can see, how can i understand that a certain impulse is needed so that we can grind everything that we had to, including, together with vo, how to revive this circulatory system. well, the thing is, she's already alive. here's what happened themselves, which we've been discussing recently. uh, he shows us strategically how we should develop, first of all and absolutely correctly there the first question. this question was raised at the summit. uh, we need not just trade, oh, which i wanted to say that but came to life as the republics joined, but lived trade. we need cooperative ties in all states. i apologize for interrupting you, they had a performance. well, it’s as if someone usually brings their national issues to the fore, forgetting about the main ones, but here everything put industrial cooperation in the first place.

that is, all the members of our union are suffocating differently. yes, yes absolutely right and you don't forget. here, if we say, let's say, and our e enterprises. i will give you an example. uh, that means, u directors uh, the former director, and the minsk automobile plant said that in the soviet union, uh, opera. it means that they cooperated. there were 2,000 enterprises with which you copied , but it’s clear to us that some enterprises have already been destroyed, it’s clear that the technologies are already different, and of course, there will no longer be those operating enterprises that were in the soviet union, but we need to build this cooperation one more aspect in bishkek, on which the sun of the president, therefore, the scaling of our union, that is. let's switch from the format of the e-eurasian economic union, these next, on your own, that is, brix, i immediately remembered at that moment. e. andrey vladimirovich periodically says that the world of global presence is leaving,

probably competitions. yes, there is a globalist project when the demolition of the national demolition of the sovereign and here we see proposals makes such large unions on the basis of equality. here is andrey vladimirovich how do you see the implementation of unpacking this project? well, yes, you said that western sanctions helped us. yes, the guilty person once said that reforms. it is done not when it is necessary, but when it is impossible not to do it. and so often very integration processes begin. e quickly accelerate when they become vital. i think that the words that the president said are, first of all, let's scale and expand our union the eurasian union. he needs to gain weight and he needs to consolidate. and? pay attention. he talked about the creation and new industries and talked about the creation. uh, the financial system is completely independent, which will

focus on financing the development of the long term. that is, this is already a completely new level of e -economic relations and an absolutely new level of industrial e-policy. but as soon as we leave to this level, then you need to take the next step after all. we do not live here in isolation. we live on the territory of greater eurasia and our neighbor is china india and this implies a certain structure of relations if we build these mutual relations. as they say, the structure of reliable partnerships will be built here , then we will essentially not need anything else, we will have both resources and a sales market and all our production potential that exists in belarus will be able to realize itself completely, therefore, in the president's words, it is more likely that the long-term perspective is movement not even

for a year, but for 3-5-15 years ahead, as far as strategic ones are concerned. it is necessary, firstly, to ensure in the shortest possible time a real exit to the implementation of joint projects to create the most modern production facilities, in fact, production facilities of the future, this is necessarily an element of our economic sovereignty in belarus, close cooperation has been established with the regions. met and alexander lukashenko has always been an adherent of such an idea that it is necessary to develop cooperation pointwise, well, with such a big country. we had a connection with the head of the chelyabinsk region of russia just a month ago. he moved with a visit to belarus with a large delegation. we visited several enterprises at once, of course, met with the president of belarus like this. uh, i would like to ask, how do you assess, in principle, such interaction with e

regions of russia at a high level belarusian attention, from the president, but does it give any do we have traditional fruits? hmm scientific industrial connections and contacts, and the economy of the chelyabinsk region and belarus in many ways. uh, we are similar, uh, industrial engineering. uh, we have developed agriculture in the regions, so back in soviet times, by the way, we discussed this when we talked with the president, and our cooperation that our connections are historical kripki and uh, from belarus we receive various wheeled vehicles of this belaz mining dump truck, uh, this and buses, maz which run on our city e-routes, and this is tractor. today,

more than half of the equipment in agriculture in our country is equipment, and that is why we traditionally have produced in belarus. hmm uh, contacts are strong and here are some. today you can call the locomotive of bilateral relations. if we are talking about the future for us, of course, we need to develop our cooperation, and here we are, we are entering m-m of my last visit. uh, discussed these uh, options for cooperation agreed. i mean, uh, we will increase the volume of mutual deliveries. in particular, we agreed on an additional acquisition, and tractors from the minsk tractor plant in the chelyabinsk region, our enterprises are interested in buying. uh, the same pilazes and uh, mmk uh, are now actively cooperating and interacting, including belaz trucks running on

gas engine, uh fuel, you know, we produce lng right in magnitogorsk, so this is a very topical issue, huh? in general, we, uh, uh, when during the last visit, we communicated with fellow belarusian industrialists at this site, and the ministry of industry is our business mission. uh, more than twenty enterprises i had more than 100 meetings. here is a meeting with, uh, in the ministry. i was personally present. we, in fact , laid out each project, by the way, during the discussion. i realized that, but maybe you know more projects, they just don’t even know about each other. e, and. well, in particular, we offered we have strong competencies in terms of production automation. we are doing this on a turnkey basis, and, uh, after belarus was also included in the

sanctions lists. this topic has become, and colleagues became interested simply as an example, and also in connection with an increase in production volumes by car. ural we have a need to purchase a larger quantity of a much larger quantity of components that are traditionally produced in belarus with delivery to the chelyabinsk region. we also discussed there a significant increase, and the belarusians are interested in this. and, of course, we are in this, but we are interested. well, i'll repeat myself. we are ready to continue to purchase. hmm, and the equipment of belarusian e, manufacturers, and directly in belarus have concluded additional supply contracts. thank you very much in connection with this question, probably vladimir borisovich to you from the point of view of the noir of the integration associations in which we are a member today . uh, belarus is enough. are we doing enough and maybe we are not doing

enough. well, you know, the initiatives of our allies, in general, a very interesting time. now you know from the point of view of information wars, and what our colleagues on both sides of the barricades are wearing, not only information wars, uh, our alliances and uh, as soon as we have some kind of sensible idea, as soon as a new one is signed agreement, as soon as integration deepens more in some direction, immediately on the other side of the barricades, naturally, a whole storm of emotions arises, a storm of influence on the minds of the liberal -minded population both in russia and in belarus in other countries that are in alliance with us in order to nullify in the first place. you will ridicule all these intentions, all these desires and all these wills of the leaders of states and push them into the only path that their customers and western liberals prescribed for them.

states. in general, while ah, some hegemons arrive in agony over the fact of losing their hegemony. these same unions are formed. we are talking about evrazrez and its union state and the cis