good evening, good evening, exactly 22 years before my birthday on may 1, 1947, an appeal was published by a group of soviet scientists

, cultural workers, public figures with a proposal to create an all-union society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. yep , social science. let's just say it's not outdated. today, firstly, marat sergeevich look at you well with mathematics, and it is the same society that spreads not only public political knowledge, but also scientifically. well, in a sense naturally scientific. so we invite you. why not yet among our lecturers, but in fact , yes, there were such conversations even in soviet times and social science. it was on the one hand, recognizable on the other hand. as the youth says, it has become a meme, let us recall, and this figured in soviet comedies. but this does not mean that it was something so bad or wrong, on the contrary. it was in great demand. i found social science lecturers when i was very young, i remember, then they came to us and told us quite a lot . interesting things, but i'm not talking about the library of social studies. imagine, recently, uh,

graduate students asked me, and how lecturers used to prepare, when there was no internet, and this is how the social studies library was, there were these amazing brochures, where information was summarized. yes. there, in different countries on various problems, and with this they really armed the facts with arguments, and the newspaper was not in vain. that was the name of arguments and facts and, who knows, yes it was an official absolutely official body, the most knowledge societies, by the way, were even printed in these millions. yes? that's all, you know, it's true again, so i invite you to become our lecturer. i don't reach. people are waiting for you. eh, but at the same time, in the nineties, they wanted to abandon the knowledge society, as well as other soviet traditions, but life itself showed that it is necessary to come to people live, talk, explain, convey their point of view. look how synchronously the processes of the revival of social science are going on in our country and in russia, you can ask, but how in

other countries? uh-huh. it's just called differently . here are the traditions of educational clubs, communities, they are very common. that's generally the structures within the individual lands. germany has a structure. similar to social studies are called educational centers there. somehow, here we often represent classic english clubs , you know, these gentlemen sit and drink a cigar and smoke. e tea, uh, whiskey, i probably don’t know and then hunts for a leaf of nothing like that in fact, and classic english clubs are what they are educational structures. i'm not talking about the fact that in the european tradition, and the enlightenment there, in broad masks, they spoke about the organization of various courses. that's what it is. consciousness with many political parties is a very topical issue for belarus now, the development of political parties, and so, with many political parties there are appropriate educational or

research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes, it created not only public leaders, yes, but even screen heroes. yes, through the same outstanding actor balala yes, a favorite of women, yes, that is, the sixties there , but knowledge in recent years has not had bright public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, they will not even name the head of the knowledge society of the soviet union or the belarusian republican and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? become a media conductor of knowledge well, in society well, i think that several factors have converged here at once, but first of all, yes, the first part of your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, maybe the leaders. it is not necessary to know which academician, for example, headed social studies, that academician

vavilov stood at the base there, konstantin simonov , the famous poet, that is, this initiative came from them; have organized this work. he understands that it is so important that we want to call the speakers you want to call the lecturers classical, and the people who come to the audience is charged. and what is called establishing contact. these are the people we have, we have them, and we are actively inviting them as part of the events that we hold. let's take two of ours, probably, for the last year, the largest most basic actions by which we are recognized and by which we are proud, belarus 1 and belarus 1 in the pravda regime. it appeared e. well, somewhere spontaneously. that's just

a big conversation with the president, where he raised the issue of the knowledge society. uh, and already in august-september on the eve of our first day national unity on september 17th. we decided to drive through the regions and we saw that shpakovsky dermant is avdonin. i can list more. these are the people who are recognized, trusted, listened to and expected. that is, we can say that they are ordered in a good way. yes, we work by order in a broad sense, according to the social order and specifically of certain organizations, and in fact often they order not some kind of lecture, but this or that person. here we are waiting. let him come to us, and we will continue to continue. borovik. petrovsky a. bilyaev that's what pleases me, journalists have appeared, who are waiting for a little light, a smooth tour indeed. and they know how to communicate with, uh, the audience, the audience listens to them completely or not quite agrees to

argue, discusses. it is very important. look how many people like this we have. e in the deputy corps. and so you need to work with them for them. if you like, you need to create a platform matrix to offer a model of working methods, because we have also established even this year or two and the form of work, be it a dialogue platform. whether lecture. it is necessary to change it is necessary to change the format of reporting information. let it be a little, but nevertheless, that is, this forum was such a shot. yes, it needs to be repeated. and what form of e are you looking at. here we have in february, and on the eve of the vote on the constitution, there was a large forum in the regime of truth in the sports palace, and on september 17th. eh, there was something similar to e in well dedicated to history, this is our history in minsk on september 17 - this was carried out under the auspices of the ministry of culture. we partially participated there, but we saw that

people such formats are in demand well, vladimir france still. look here. we are now talking about speakers. they are more or less, even professionally trained, but in the same ussr there was galina ulanova yes, a ballerina a ballerina. yes , it can be called silver now. yes, they would. but i know who you see now as the headliners of the renewed society. you know , it's interesting, they mentioned the ballerino, as if you were reading our plans. although i know that mine is not shared admitted. yes, we are working very hard right now. actively with our big theatre. e, with e. ekaterina dulova about the interaction and forms of presenting information using musical theatrical methods, and i really like the way we worked. i also see that people are in demand on the stage of the kupala theater, when in august of this

year our kupala patriotic forum was held. and we even interact with the national beauty school. we see, i’ll say it directly, maybe even looking ahead. here is our famous merch of the first those slogans that are written with with which we come out, because behind each of these slogans there is an idea. behind each of these slogans there is a certain message, this appeal and it can be revealed, relying on it, you can convey this or that information, an idea, it can be embodied in different forms, and we are trying these forms. and in working with the audience. you have an understanding, if we remember the social science of the soviet union, we understand. there were 2,000 academicians, there were more than 200,000 doctors. yes, there were 400,000 engineers, yes, who took part in one way or another in the work social science. we understand that in order to come to the same audience of cultural workers. yes

, it is desirable that a person has certain knowledge in this area and speaks the same language with them. you have this understanding. ah, but if he talks about the topic of cultures, because we have cultural workers, i had to speak. eh, workers in the sphere of culture, if you are talking about geopolitics or economics, you should first of all analyze another issue in this. you correctly mean that when you communicate with people, you must understand who you are talking to. and speak to them in a language they understand and understand, although i will tell you. right now, on the eve of the seventy-fifth anniversary, we have organized such a lecture marathon on the basis of the academy of management, a series of lectures dedicated to the national idea of ​​geopolitics, economics, and historical continuity. and this is a very profound lecture. it's because, you know, we have sometimes. they want to follow the audience, they just want to captivate, but it is important that there is knowledge and understanding of arguments, and we organized such a series of lectures, and we we see how people perceive, and we will continue this

lecture hall. you have already mentioned that the president was an active lecturer in social science and in 1978 it was he who became the executive secretary of the shklov regional organization. yes, the society is now becoming the head of the republican. social science yes, you certainly raised the archives. yes, and interested. by this very fact, of course, i am grateful to our archival workers. we looked at the materials. and by the way, they also looked at newspaper publications, because social science has always been actively reflected in the media as it is now. here. you, when you said that you had not heard anything for several years, but this communication was not organized. i'm not saying who's to blame there knowledge or themselves . well, this fact is just very important to interact. by the way, when the society was created in the forty-seventh year, one of the tasks was the wide publication in the media , including, interestingly, the transcripts of the lecture. this is such a task that we can

say that lecturer lukashenka was expected. uh it information trusted the audience what we now know were always overflowing, he was preparing for a lecture. this is very important. uh worked, relevant literature. this is what we see, and at that time i am convinced that the formation of the personality of our president is of his certain style. that time of work and the responsible secretary, the electric motor wife had more time than, uh, holding a full-time position in the knowledge society. so this had a big impact on him. ok then. here is the president by his decree in 2007 transformed the public association knowledge into a republican state public association. come on, it's a status, and with your appointment in the twenty-first year. yes, in fact, he breathed new life into it. well let's talk

straight. i don’t bow before you, i say what is what i see, i’ll sincerely appreciate clairvoyance. president, he knows what will be needed in the future, and i'm not just talking about your organization. well, you will agree, what is anti-privatization alone worth. yes, lord, the enterprise and pandemics, when we were not driven by moisture. when he really wanted to, and here's how you explain these things to yourself. this is some kind of special knowledge. well , firstly, with regard to the attention of the president to our society, my feelings and the decree was not only the seventh year, but also last year in november. he didn't just support us. well, he set specific tasks and they are promising, but also demanding, which we must do in the field of historical knowledge of political and scientific popularization of science. of course, we will fulfill the goals and objectives that have been set, but if

to speak to the president, lukashenka, of course, this is a very big intuition. it's important, that we don't learn. this is an innate feeling. then a great worldly experience is huge. that's why the president always says you need to go from life, because there should be no artificiality, there should be desire. well, you know, you need to indulge in something rational, which is characteristic of our belarusian nature of reasoning. and elka, i'm like me. well, maya be an anchor drumming kambulepiy, not only you have an axis alley, uh, you live somewhere and this is a clear one an understanding that is peculiar to us, it is inherent in the president, of course, this is a huge store of knowledge certainly ah and trust in specialists, because look, during the same covid

, there were always specialists next to the president. in this area. these are not some arbitrary decisions. they are based on a deep analysis of the information provided by specialists, and only after that one or another decision is made. on tuesday, the president held an important meeting to bring individual laws in line with the updated constitution. here are two of the most important document. these laws of the supreme people's council were considered in the belarusian people's assembly and law-political parties. here are the main messages you heard for yourself, not debatable, but those that are necessary for deep reflection, understanding and bringing to people. and now you must agree that your task is precisely this when we discussed the changes in the add. the constitution was just the same questions concerning the entire belarusian people's assembly were. uh, among the leaders in uh, discussion. yeah

people asked what it's for what it's already when we held dialogue platforms in the fall. why is it necessary that the entire belarusian people's assembly was not asked if there was understanding, there is understanding, and the question arose only there, how to form it. eh, how will it be directly? yes, how will it work? here, it seems, uh, the main thing is not lukashenka needs the belarusian people's assembly. it is not necessary for the presidential power, it is necessary for the country, for which, to ensure the stable development of society. to ensure continuity and as a vivid embodiment of a genuine principle. democracy. unfortunately, the model of democracy that is offered to us, and more often imposed by the west , is a manipulative model, we see how it

actually happens. this is the model of the oligarchy, which uses various cunning technologies. he is trying to explain to the people, but to create the illusion that the people are involved in governance, we are really laying the whole belarusian people's assembly, uh, the principle of our true democracy that we associate it with our traditions. this is no coincidence. here i will not even touch the evening. take the 20th century, our belarusian experience, the all-belarusian congress of the 17th year. it was in a non-parliamentary form, but the people got together and claimed their right to live in their own land and determine how we live. take the people’s assembly of western belarus in the thirty-ninth year, thanks to which we united in one state, it had great legitimacy, and we can see this from the documents, any historian who has come across the history of the people’s gathering for skhodni and belarus will confirm that it was

genuine popular representation in the ninety- sixth year in full swing. we remember the islands of constitutional political crisis. the people's assembly is all belarusian. the people's assembly played a huge role in the twentieth year in february. that is, we are already shaping our historical experience, including that of recent history, into a legislative form, that is, not something so illusory, but something that already exists, something that has already been developed and is laying a certain perspective. yes, we are pioneers here, but this is not necessary. be afraid, because we still rely on our understanding of our political system. and how to ensure the main principle that the people should be the source of power is good, but the main reproach that is thrown. yes, to the authorities, that the labor collectives will not be practically represented in the composition of the supreme people's council, the president spoke very clearly about this,

how you will bring it up. eh, i'll tell you that when we had discussions now. here, uh, reproach. eh, even contrived. uh, that such a problem was not raised, people rather said how they to participate, you just need to know how. explain, because there the majority will be just the same representatives of labor collectives. here is a specific example. approximately, this is a deputy and, moreover, of all levels of the village councils and the president insisted that we preserve the village council in the constitution, this is the first level, when a person encounters a representative of power or vice versa takes on part of this power, becoming a deputy from village council before a national assembly house of representatives council republic and this is not a representative of labor collectives. where do our deputies come from? in our country , deputies only in the house of representatives work off-duty. other. look. these are doctors teachers businessmen. eh,

there are people. well, let’s take this or that collective well further, our main subjects of civil society, who will send their representatives to the trade union, well, the trade union is the flesh of labor collectives, in principle, labor collections are belarusian republican unions, youth and where we have young people in the audience and in labor collectives, they will also be nominated, the same applies to the veterans of belarus of the women's union, these are the representatives of these collectives. and why do we have a question then in general public association. if not they put forward with us the same director of the enterprise has quite a lot of worries about the economy and the provision of jobs for the sale of products. i can list further. we are still the management and, uh, the team has a task than the organization. here is the election. and why was there a trade union in this collective then, and why did they

nominate their deputy from this collective either by collecting signatures or directly from the collective. this is their voice, their voice will be presented to the entire belarusian national assembly, so there is logic here. it seems obvious to me. it seems to me that it is necessary to emphasize one more point, the president drew attention to it well. delegates do not just have to participate in the entire belarusian people's assembly. they must then come to their labor collectives and report back. that is, they should then work with them, something that we lacked before the constitutional referendum, and before this law we had e we were delegates, but now we have worked out all the belarusian people's gathered. let's be honest, let's go. here you took part once and that's it. no. now you are for the entire duration of the entire belarusian people's assembly. what makes it easier, first of all, to be responsible to those who nominated you? it was not just you who attended you talked with like-minded people, worked there 1 2, 3 more days listened to the president asked questions

discussed the program of socio-economic development and is responsible for the implementation of this decision and, moreover, the powers that we vest in the entire belarusian people's assembly. they are huge, it's actually such a team. body e, in whose hands will be the fate of our country, including even in the most difficult situations, a good political party. yes, the second part of the second normative document that was discussed. here's a clear one for you. which parties should remain. that's what we discussed a lot on this topic, yes, and we have there were different points of view. look here. let's compare with those countries where our political parties came from, in fact. they were reborn there, of those parties that we study in the course, classical political science, which they wrote about. uh, scientists representatives of political science in the middle of the xx well, there are none. well, take it any, but oh well, there is an american system, it is special. well

, take the french parties. well, where are those classical socialists and communist goalists now creating new movements. uh, very fast dynamics of political life. everything changes, and we are often offered. no, let's go back. here we will create something to that scheme of the fifties. we must, firstly, follow the trends, and secondly, proceed from our own interests, the party should not divide society. it should represent the interests of a significant part of society, not necessarily all, but not to divide the party should not demand the overthrow of the constitutional order. it can and should criticize the authorities, if it is not the authorities itself, but not to lead to a civil split of the party can not be financed and abroad the party can not be an instrument of an individual oligarch or oligarchic groups. it cannot be bought by some big businessman. these are the key

requirements, but the party must also have some kind of ideology. a party cannot be created just to participate in this or that electoral campaign. and this is a very serious demand that the party must represent the whole of society. er, well, not necessarily. that's it for all citizens, but if it's a party it should be in it should be in minsk and vitebsk in all regions, except for the regional level. we have districts, but if not in all of them, well, at least in the third there should be structures, when a person comes out, he says, i am a representative of one party or another. we must understand. yes, there are at least 10 behind it, they have 20-30 thousand party members. here is such a program, we understand who we are dealing with, and if the party was created in order to cut grants or satisfy someone's ambitions, why belarusian society such a party? and most most importantly, god forbid, if this happens, this is in the future a way of manipulating our

political system, as a rule, from abroad. this is where clear obstacles are placed. you think we've already got rid of it. from random batches, here's a new one sorted out. not yet, not yet, not yet. let's wait for the adoption of the law, then, as i understand it, the procedure for re-registration of parties must go through, probably some parties will leave. even obviously there will be new parties. uh i don't know if we can talk about uh concrete examples here, well, i would still say, look how they showed themselves. the communist party works according to the norms, and many have tried to impose such an image. eh, this party is from the past. yes, this is it. where does it come from, only old people, well, there are historians. well, look how many young sheets appeared in the bright recognizable liberal democratic party. how it works , yes, yes, there are ambitions about white russia. well , let's see how the situation will develop. i see that there is. eh, some ideological ones. well, no

matter how associations, but niches based on our constitutional system, which is not yet represented at the party level, so they may have appeared. i like your thought that was said. that's when we started discussing this block. eh, after all, it ’s really not the vns, nor the party, the president doesn’t really need them, they are personal. yes, he does not need them as portraits. indeed, in fact, the president has always communicated directly with the people, and this was his main distinguishing feature. here, in essence. we are talking about the fact that they should become the same parties, uniting on the ivn with such a uniting beginning to protect against external threats, as if observing the main principle, everything is in the interests of their state. now, if we clearly understand this and convey this moment, probably, well, it seems to me, then the understanding will be correct. let's just say alexander lukashenko, he is the creator. here is that independent sovereign belarus as we know it. i think it's hard for anyone to argue with that.

and now he understands. time is changing, and belarus is changing, and he wants to define it. uh, that political model, including the social model a model of our development that will remain for many years to come, and we are interested in this. this is where the president's interest coincides with the public interest. uh-huh i got such an idea pushed. look, we have been talking for several years in a row, including as part of the work of lecturers, or are there speakers? uh, here, we already had a lecturer. i remember in truth mode well? yes, people reacted well, thanks to the people sitting here, including, uh, this was such a collective work in fact. here look, we have been talking about the training manual for several years. sharpe yes, and 50 years will already be as follows does not work. look, well, yes, and essentially 2020. yes, he made a professional out of us, those who

are already beginning to really understand what happened, how it happened and that we are not really unique in all this, but we turned out to be the only ones who turned out to be too tough for the smell, because i am very as he says a little warms the soul, maybe we already have our own methodological manual in the society of knowledge. yes, and not anti- sharpa? yes, but on lukashenka's manual there is such there is such a request, and m-m it is obvious to do this, i will just share with you an observation you have in your twentieth year. well, in general, we spoke today in the belarusian character. there is such a character, we do not like to brag or show our own there , on the contrary, we hide something somewhere. well , you know that there, uh, and the neighbors did not envy, and so, well, just in case, so as not to jinx it. well , sometimes belarusians are not often treated like that, uh, and i noticed that a lot of colleagues in russia and even in foreign countries

want to learn this experience, but do it so carefully. inviting to some events or coming here and now, not immediately, but gradually speaks. and how did you do it? and what did you do, and why did they do it this way, and indeed, not only opponents, but also allies or potential allies are looking at us very seriously. this belarusian experience is very valuable. i think that we are already in lectures somewhere, talking at international conferences. e, including with statesmen of foreign countries outlined this experience. uh, well, perhaps it is time to generalize it and offer it in the form of some possible one. i just won't do research. don't just sprinkle stupid. i have stressed one point all the time writing until now this information is hanging free encyclopedia. yes, like wikipedia that in order to cope with that information war

with the information war in the twentieth here. arrived. yes, a few. in search of a journalist, yes, and which provided this informational victory, and in fact, when we understand that we they did it themselves. uh, it's well worth the availability of information. yes, i want to ask, you were the dean of the faculty, you know how to communicate with young people. here are our enemies. they didn't calm down. they very much count on the younger generation, which will have the right to vote before the electoral campaign. yes, and the right to choose. they need such new blood to replace the one that either figured out the situation or sat down, as they say, yes. here, are you going to use fashion internet platforms and talks in the same tiktok about the same genocide, continuing the previous questions, in order to be successful, you don't have to try to be fashionable, but

because there will only be an external form without a result, and you don't have to work according to the training manual. and there must be inspiration and there must be. here, uh , you know this understanding, as the military, they say you want to win, knowing that you have become, but i am fighting not according to the charter. here you must understand the algorithm of actions, what you must do, but if you speak only according to the charter, nothing will work. if you don’t know, the joint won’t work either, so we need understand. this basis should be knowledge and a sense of the situation. well, we see how our president works. and as for the youth for 2 years. let me tell you, quite a lot has been honestly done, and we even see how the enemy reacts to this, uh, i will not only speak knowledge in my society. we work very closely with the ministry of education. look, the anthem is being performed in schools. very serious systematic work is being done on historical education on

patriotic education. a new social science discipline. bloc, are being introduced brightly, our union with the youth is working enough. we are already seeing the results i have talked to our military. and they point out that even, uh, the call has begun to change. these guys who join the army, now the armed forces are generally more widespread. and that's good. i would even say e well, not all problems. of course, we have decided here in the youth sphere. i don’t want this in any way, but you can’t help but see the trends that are positive for the more problematic age from 30 to 45. these are, say, former or young people who are not so left a long time ago because of that age, and which we missed somewhere in those years when, perhaps, we underestimated the importance of ideology, we were a little embarrassed to talk about patriotism, at least, as we do now, issues of historical education of culture. let's

put it straight, and then our mediaological opponents. there was simply dominance, well, you must admit the ninety-first to 2003, almost a word of ideology. let's say. here we are now, uh, we know our relationship to bullish symbolism, right? the twentieth year, the beginning of the nineteenth, i do not say in the center city ​​store next to the academy of the ministry of internal affairs on masherov avenue where it's all freely sold and not only there at the airport you fly out. that's where it all is. it is sold virtually freely. here's what happened recently. and so, the generation that was formed in that period was young and young. it is even necessary to work with them, maybe more in-depth than although with all categories, of course. uh, you need to work, but we can see from sociology that this is at least another one, okay then. if not new, then working form. yes, not informing the attitude towards them is different. well

one of the biggest critics in front of you is how we do it. well, here you will agree that it largely depends on the specific speakers correctly, who travel correctly to a specific team. maybe i'll give you a little first. firewood into this fire, and then you will kindle it. yes, i am gasoline, i will tell you my impression, when i come to the team to perform, it is very important for me that the team is not selected in such a way that it is absolutely smooth. i want them to be sharp questions. and sometimes it still seems to me that these people are simply afraid to be introduced into this team, and there is such a thing, of course, it’s good. why? you are my most critical critic and i consider myself to be one because i had to. eh, go through all the stages. eh, this form of work. e has been introduced in our country since 2003 , when the system policy actually began. here is march 2003, the beginning of the

state ideological policy was a big seminar, the president signed decrees for that and off i was a teacher who was engaged in this work. i was one of the leaders youth union, who also came at the bottom of the information. as you rightly said, i was also the dean at the union of journalists, we did this, worked in the media, that is, i can see how it is often organized with a lot of formalism. that's what we write for. we talked about training manuals, because a corresponding brochure is written for each day of informing, relying on which, creatively, processing this information, it is necessary to convey the point of view that we sometimes get it. they just take it and read it out. hearing teams what we want to achieve. so it's better, in general, not to hold such a day of informing , than to hold a question. our speakers, recognizable promoted in the media, of course, will not arrive on the day of information for each team. although, believe me, there are a

lot of bright people in the region. this year we held belarus 1. what wonderful historians do we have in the regions? i'm, well, amazing, actually, that is , these people are local, maybe they are not, recognizable nationally, by the way, that's it television, we need to raise them and invite them here to minsk from mogilev, vitebsk in a grodny car. yes, there are definitely these people, we see them. now, during our actions, we saw them precisely in your companies. in my opinion. can give us the text of the speakers, who today are not enough ready to do it and will do it. these are not empty words. so continuing the day of informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy director for ideological work and how we appoint them a person who simply reads a training manual aloud this one. he probably shouldn't be in this position. it is rightly said that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well, the word is such a commodity, but this person must be unique, i understand, you won’t find such people everywhere

, so we need to think here how to convey, maybe, uh, and it’s bad, uh, with these events. let's do it in one day, there is 3,500 meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk to implement to hold seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy of management, where he brought bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online in the form, when we have a person who understands this problem through online can cover? docks krug e our teams we offer it. you understand here. eh, even one beautiful tete-presentation, as you had in the truth mode. here you come with this one, you don’t need to collect everyone. well, one person speaker will come to the district on the topic of the day of informing and believe me, the whole district will know, do not go there collect from everyone, there are 150 enterprises of people, the whole

district will know, but it is important to live here the second part, so that officials and representatives of state authorities actually travel. these are two lines. this speaker is an expert who understands a particular problem and representatives of state authorities, for whom the day of informing is a way to communicate, learn about the problems of the team, and answer people's questions. it does not always work out, yet, but we should think about improving this work. and in principle, if you like, our state ideological politics. that's in the broadest sense of the word. this is an informative and legal basis for the form of the method of work of organizational staffing. we need to restart, firstly, from those normative acts that were adopted back in the third and fourth year. wow, how much time has passed the twentieth year has taught us a lot now on life teaches, and therefore, it seems to me, the time has come. uh, not only such a serious big conversation, but the solution, uh, in this part, we had a

seminar in june under the leadership of the president on work. here is this explanatory very sound thought. there the president also spoke at this seminar. e, noted the direction of the work and made a remark and criticized, but already half a year has passed. it seems to me, especially a year before the electoral campaign of our single day. which will be in 24 , just the time has come for such a systematization of all this work and our achievements and shortcomings. a and. that's what we said restart, if you like, maybe a provocative question. now yes, and i am the other two and do not expect knowledge significantly 2/3 of all lectures were paid. yes, this system is assumed in your knowledge society. yes, and they now have paid lectures. i understand such a question always as well, here, let's just have an ideology. well, let's

just say somewhere, maybe, and uh, the load, of course, as a public one. i'll tell you straight. we have all performances within the framework. the constitutional clarification campaigns were all free. well, here is a civil call, a patriotic call , all people work like that, but at the same time. well, let's take our expert. well, let's say it's up to the price. university well, firstly, he needs to break away from his the main activity, often, is going somewhere outside the same minsk if he himself is from minsk yes , and on the territory in minsk, he needs to prepare very seriously for this, both emotional and intellectual costs should be compensated. well , why not, especially if, uh, our enterprises have allocated funds for this? after all , if the company orders, as we said , one color or another. well, his expenses for this

work should be compensated from my point of view. this is right. here's how to organize this work, and again at a new level, we are now discussing such agreements, and many of our trade union organizations and enterprises conclude directly. eh, but we see that it still needs to be generalized in some way, again put on a new basis. speakers here, perhaps in this situation, many themselves want to. listen, this was such a case. we are on the talk show of vladimir rudolfovich. solovyov somehow mentioned this possibility when everyone arrived home. everyone says we will come. i think they are waiting for our audience, by the way, and certain surprises our phone cut off says when sad and insulting. that's all the same. here i say, belarus here we are, sometimes we value someone else's. uh, well, the russians are not completely foreign to us, but there in moscow or somewhere else. well, let's say. this is the same as with a musical performer will be here to sing to perform. you

know very well that as soon as fr. o. you see, you will play in our theater, well, the circle of theater-goers will know, as soon as somewhere not even in the series in moscow at the theater. how is it customary they will speak, they say, well, you see, they took it, this is how we feel it, as soon as you become more often speaking on moscow talk shows, as it were of course, let's talk about it directly, but at the same time i want to say that the level of our specialists is experts for the vast majority of problems is very high. here. the main thing on the same russian talk shows. you were the dean of the faculty of philosophy, philosophy of social sciences, philosophy, sociology, psychology, social communications, social sciences, keyword, philosophy, it is understandable for everyone, as it were, and does not say anything, but still, yes, and the last ones are about a philosophical question, despite the fact that i would like to talk for a long time, but today the

fight against russia has become a trend, right? not we, of course, once the trend was the minsk agreements and the end of the war. yes, in the donbass, for the sake of new trends in the fight against russia, wars with russia changed their shoes. even very strong politicians, as we thought. well, like the mercury of france, another attempt to repaint was ugly. sorry for such an exact word a lot western politicians. they no longer stand in the same row. don't give up golem, no chipping, no statcher or with a shredder. i'm not saying that they can't stand on a par with ours. this is what must happen today in order for new european leaders to appear who, first of all, will think about their country, their people, and national interests. here's how to make it an international trend? this is definitely its a special military operation.

it became a test for everyone, for russia, for us, for the west, and for the processes that were latent. they came out what we are seeing the culture of the abolition of russia belarus is fascism. this is fascism, this is xenophobia, which they are trying to substantiate with some pseudo-democratic slogans, the fascisization of europe, we see it and we can prove it fascisization is not necessary, the fascist party and the national socialist or there is no hyper musalini, read mrt eco read other european thinkers. how did they describe it? and how does it happen? unfortunately, we see this happening. yes, the leaders were crushed, but i am not a supporter of these conversations that this is all the end europe will be convinced and new ones. well, others

you see, when they copy as they tried, johnson is copying somewhere, churchill well, there is a track for today, i will give examples of orban. why not? yes, this is a bright politician, and our opponent is an ideological political ill-wisher of belarus and the same kachinsky, is he not bright, and by the way, many in poland hate, and many idolize erdogan. it's not exactly europe, but nonetheless. and now he returned to politics again, and berlusconi is ours, well, older, but this is this generations of our we, well, our contemporary is convinced that it will appear, how it happens life will make life make it just ignore those challenges like ostriches to hide their heads repeat, like a barrel of delusional slogans. uh, you understand over and over again, there barrel stoltenberg ursula fonderland already some comic characters from

ukraine and russia do not decide anything, but constantly reproduce some kind of uh some information, yes, if you can call it that and that's it , but it is not they who decide the time will come for strong leaders, when these are the tests before which now we are setting, we are standing, but it is also standing behind, because he is losing harmony, he is doomed to defeat. it is inevitable that the center of power is moving to other regions. previously, they could no longer control the entire planet. we see this, the challenge is thrown, the struggle is hard, but they are historically doomed. and at this critical stage, a new leader will emerge. they may not look like the same degulia and certainly will not. they might be military, maybe journalists, maybe, uh, professional politics are different, but what they will appear in western at least in europe and in the usa, this is a fact. about the world of science, the discovery

that belarusian scientists make is that organisms that live, multiply in space conditions, cells can be obtained from almost any organ or tissue, the effect of treating deficiency depends primarily on the daily dose of iron that we consume daily and here is the duration of therapy, which is currently being worked on in laboratories, leading scientific institutes of the country in this regard. we are also developing the direction of developing a new generation vaccine. this is a vaccine recommendation vector vaccine, watch the popular science project science mania on our tv channel. the mask of successful success she is what

drew on the cow two and so on top down, so 3 each of us plays different roles during our lives. and here is what to do for those whose contribution at close range does not notice the reward. this desire to go forward is a reward - this is the story of such a life that is necessary for me by the side, let's say so, and you know it, and for me it is very important in my youth. this is bullshit. it was invented. look in the program for the concept of harmlessness on tv channel belarus 24. we will introduce you to the inhabitants of our country. we cannot sit in one place. we need a certain movement, and everyone feeds on emotions, in their own way, our heroes have a lot of interesting stories behind their backs, there were different situations. uh, starting from the loss of a conductor's baton

to such situations, when mm, for example, not all musicians. eh, we understood what piece is being played next and they are all ready to surprise again and again school to do a set on the blog watch here i go, i'm off to watch the belarusians project on belarus 24 tv channel.

live news at noon in the studio elizaveta lokotka hello in this issue. six people died, three were injured in intensive care after a fire in a house on shevchenko boulevard in minsk, our correspondents are working at the scene of the tragedy.