pressure, perhaps, is one of the most resonant fragments of the personnel day for the presidents on monday, which, firstly, charged a leader, and secondly, showed all the determination in response to any pressure from the outside , i listen, some kind of ukrainian polish or finnish masters. people stay technology stays in production there are electrodes. in to work your president. uh, the issue of a change of ownership is now being resolved. and i think next year he works gone know do not want what kind of change of ownership from now on the enterprise. nationalized what change of ownership? and how will we solve the issue of the government for half a year it is considered

that this enterprise is yours gone? wave to them to cross that they have left you property. yet there is this. well, igor petrush. well, i told you, for example, and mcdonald 's said it worked and works, and people come and produce normal products. but the americans or whoever the kazakhs did not want this enterprise of ours? russia does not work. well, as you wish, our people are not stupider, so that, as i said, cut this bun and shove it there lettuce or a piece sausages, because that's how it has become here. they didn't take anything with them. but if they took it, then i would take off their heads, respectively, people, no one should take anything away. you must not allow this. well, we searched for your area and said the answer. ikea ah and those, well, goodbye, there are these stools

, uh, chairs and other things that we can't do, especially if they didn't take anything and the people stayed, the owner left, well, go justice. well, i would not consider it, only from the point of view of justice of injustice. here, of course, the question very deep and multi-layered, because we are talking about the economic component , first of all, we provided conditions for the work of foreign e, investors, owners. and today. for political reasons, they leave enterprises and leave us with problems - this is that people do not work, our people who live in the regions, and here is the delay in this process. exclusively, but in order to set the right precedent for for belarus to show some new practice

of how these issues can be resolved, and for political reasons, i absolutely. e, i agree with the approach that it needs to be dosed somehow either by the economy or by politics, when we start to mix things up, then all parties suffer, so i would approach this. that's just how it is for now. yes, i would say that this is how the first president protects the national interests of the country, the national interests of our economy, including the second from the legal point of view, the parliament will adopt any bills. i'm talking about it now open, which will be legally fixed. this is the third. i would like this meeting with the president to be broadcast in all russian media . why is it that the president, when he says not to take not a nail, not to withdraw nothing from what has been done here, uh, belarus brought technology? why did belarus create some conditions for investors to work quietly here, did belarus not provide all the conditions for foreign enterprises to develop. it's true, the third

point, why do they leave, because the conditions no, they are forced to leave. this is another truth and forced to leave. this means that this is purely politics, the fourth point is international law. that is, if we are talking about legal issues, why do i say that this meeting was watched in russia and as our president does, i sometimes watch russian news and wonder guys there is a war going on. everything, in fact, they are taken away on the territory of europe and america, your these oligarchs will strip you into underpants. this means that the company's accounts are being frozen. and you are still sitting saying, some one is leaving french company. let's agree. let's make some conditions. what conditions, if wanted to smell they and swift blacked out today all the red lines passed. why isn't swift disabled? and it 's not good for me. they are afraid of those who say that we will scare away the investor. why is it that we will never change the legislation on investment - on

investors, a conscientious investor. how it worked here and will work more than that, look at the statistics. first of the year first with properties first of all these events investors in belarus how did they go so the question is where are they coming from today? they don't come from europe today, they come from the middle 100. central asia means the asian market is china and that's great. but one more thing let's be honest. for example, remember the statement of a lithuanian official who is extremely concerned that lithuanian european businessmen are doing everything to circumvent the sanctions imposed by the european union and enter the russian belarusian market. here's the truth the truth is that european investors don't want runaway investors. it's not about the economy. it's about politics when they leave the protection of our national interests. we have an obligation to defend ourselves. this time and again, our actions would be even more effective if russia and all the countries of the post-soviet space would see the way that the only way to hear it is like this. this

sergey is now on the other side. why are there no international precedents? it seems to me that after our skies were closed without trial or investigation, and icao still produces some reports of its own. and we already had all airspace has been shut down. it seems to me that after that we received a green corridor for any solutions for protection. the national kiev regime actually arrested and stole, and there the property is worth millions of dollars in the form of a wagon of assembly plants. e, those, e sets that were supposed to be assembled into an electric bus, trolleybus and such precedents can be in lithuania. show our terminal in the port of klaipets, there are enough of them. i would like to emphasize here a little. eh, just one more moment. now, if we compare russia and belarus take a look the russian federation made a bet in the 1900s on a foreign investor and, in fact, a foreign investor took control. e factory in togliatti kamaz other things, when they

left for political reasons, everyone perfectly understands the political ones on the topic. the russian federation has lost these competencies. when we talk about the form of ownership and when strategic industries are in state ownership, it is clear that these investors are not strategic. then we're talking about economic sovereignty of our state. we saw this, if we did not have such an economic basis as the mason tk our huge industries, then here it is. imagine if they belonged to someone abroad, and they would have left so that we would do it, and remember at one time there was this pursuit in order to increase the share of small and medium-sized businesses. and for some reason it was proposed not to do it in parallel with the development of a large city-forming city. uh, there is a set of enterprises, and it is to harness large enterprises. we will now take it out there cities do not understand that these are blows, in fact , this sale of large large enterprises to bet on the so-called

small average here. it is probably important to indicate, including for those of our viewers who may be watching us abroad, that we are not now trying to call the platform, that now boya is a foreign enterprise specializing in a speech about what is for belarus - this story is exceptional and forced, given that once there was a credit of trust, those enterprises that were allowed to enter these sites and now the state there are obligations to the population that works, when these investors came, let me remind you. the president set the task. and so that these enterprises are, for the sovereignty of the republic of belarus, they do not oppose the republic of belarus and b, so that the enterprises are socially oriented. we are a social state, what we see here is an enterprise, or rather, the owners of these enterprises turned out to be politically biased and the second point. they, er, renounced their social obligations, that is, the two basic conditions with which they came into

they violated the republic of belarus, but we also see the relations of our country. that is, we do not liquidate these enterprises, we do not destroy workers. this is not the first time, a necessary measure. let's remember a communal apartment in the early 1990s, when some owner somehow got this communal apartment back in the early nineties. there, in the ninety-second year, he left for the united states of america. then he simply exploited this enterprise, bringing it to a slightly semi-bankrupt foreign state, this is the kind of sanction that the west is trying to use us completely, so we are responding to the sanction in this way, but i want one small moment. remember, in the average dream of any entrepreneur in belarus or russia, this is a must when you break down to open an account abroad, buy some kind of real estate there and transfer part of your assets there. unfortunately it's true. now what is the plus, and in this way we have been feeding europe all the welfare of europe at the expense of us for 30 years, and now it is over.

now. i think every entrepreneur country. and we must support them and will support them, we must finally understand that the only way to save your money is the only way to become successful. it is to develop your own country. and god forbid that in russia it is heard, of course there is. i would look at this issue even more broadly, not only in terms of national security policy. we are now seeing an attempt within the framework of a hybrid war, using both politics and economics and informational pressure, to defeat the country, given that the nuclear powers cannot use nuclear weapons; the potential is too great and everything threatens a complete catastrophe. no less effective measures of destruction are now being applied. e of the opposing state. it's right here. uh, economic such kind of sabotage. look what happens in the russian federation , not a single bearing ball of its own left

; this caused the production of ball bearings to stop. it seems like a trifle in moscow there were only two factories and now there is not one, and because of this, not a car. not planes or tanks, not everything else, and they we thank the belarusians for keeping our state-owned bearing plant in minsk. although there were proposals to close it because there are swedish german chinese bearings. and now it turned out that when there was opposition on the verge of military action, that these are the factories that have been preserved in our country. they are now playing strategic damage. not only for our state, for the entire union state, therefore, continuing the theme of developing sovereignty, we saw a large meeting of the president the day before. development of sovereignty. in this case, creating such foundations of the state. hey whites. updated the constitution by referendum and accordingly. these are quite serious, and

fundamental changes have taken place in certain articles and directions, and accordingly it is necessary to adapt the legislation to approach this reasonably on the eve of two, probably the most important issues were with the belarusian people's assembly and the poly party for a long time, so we saw that there was an attempt to find an image . this is what will happen. on the one hand, this updated status of the federal tax service is not a new phenomenon for us, but the revamped presidents clearly said, it will be the stabilizer of the society. and this is its main role. if the need arises, then it will be necessary to negotiate on its site, and the second point, including meetings, is the president, when he visited, labor collectives there, people periodically, when he came in. uh, this topic and they asked, and who will be in this navy. that's why the president answered about us. the question is, who will be in? in vns? let's listen now to the composition of the vns. representatives of all layers of belarusian society. and this is the main point. well, i noticed that some labor collectives raised the question. but how is it almost

, there will not be another meeting of officials, and so on, how labor collectives will be represented. well, maybe you didn't get through to people, didn't explain it to them, but representatives of labor collectives will have a percentage there. only the ways of movement to this meeting are somewhat different, not directly gathered. the plant nominated its representative and he is represented in the all-belarusian people's assembly and deputies from the party public organizations. all will be people. and this is labor collectives. these are teachers. this is the worker - these are the peasants. these are doctors and so on. but they must be professionals. these are not wedding generals who came and sat. whoever understood something, didn’t understand something, served time, left, there shouldn’t be such people there, and we must do everything so that the delegates, returning

to their workplaces, report to the labor collectives on the issues that were considered at the all-belarusian people’s assembly. we will do it in the best way, despite the fact that in the composition of the national assembly people will be respected. it cannot interfere in the activities of other bodies, replace them to perform their functions with the belarusian people's assembly, in fact, it must be preserved as a political institution. they develop into some kind of bureaucratic body. everything is laid out very clearly. that is, we are now waiting for the parliamentarians to finally approve everything, yes, how are you? you see, this process, which the belarusians are now carrying out, is not pretending. well, vns is a response to a request from society, and this request is that the horizontal communication. it should become the basis of this

broad representation - this is ownership in the general population and responsibility. it seems to me that the latter is such mobility appears. he understands something, like he, maybe, that's some kind of horizontal. yes, because, uh, when we talk about the vertical, uh, we mean what alexander grigorievich said, these are officials, and so that this does not turn. here in the assembly of officials is really something, but it is a broad representation and the most important thing is responsibility. although she is not very rarely do we hear this word. we talk more about representation than responsibility. he really needs to put responsibility here in the first place, when e people are involved in making any decisions, they should get used to taking responsibility, not to say what is bad, but to suggest, how to do better and take responsibility. i would like to make two points. the first president thinks not only about what is happening now, because now i am going to visit the regions, people, on the

contrary, are asking a question. hear what's there democracy. what are you doing there, in general, sometimes they ask such a situation like this. let our dad take everything into his own hands completely from beginning to end. and in general, so that everyone just sits and performs. and this, in principle, will cause an absolutely normal reaction in people now, but at the same time i want people to hear. we are democracy, we are actually developing these bills that the president spoke yesterday - these are the people of power, but what does the president think about, as i see it, he thinks that in 10-15-20 years, so that fate belarus has never dared to take to the streets, never political issues have been resolved with the help of a baton stick confrontation. e some political groups of groups. to do this, we introduced this entire belarusian assembly , moreover, this is a people's body after the referendum, because we can be proud of the people's constitution. remember how we received it, it is truly folk. it was supported by the absolute majority of belarusians and the absolute majority of belarusians, they said that all the belarusian people's assembly should be and

today the president summed up the discussion definitively, what is most important, there will be no loosening of the balance and power. there is a parliament - this is the legislative power. there is a president of the council of ministers. the vertical is the executive branch. what is the whole russian assembly a strategic political body that will not interfere with the activities of, for example, the liberal democratic party, but i will follow its decisions as the leader of the party, because the people have decided, and within the framework of these decisions with the communists. let's argue like, uh, by the way, about sport. yes, more about political parties. the most important thing is that the president said here that the entire belarusian people's assembly is responsible for the functions. that's it. uh, the league's recognition of the value of the system and the right of succession. that's when we say stabilizer. this is actually our answer to the maidan. let's speak directly to us wanted in the twentieth year. to do the ukrainian scenario here, they have this negative scenario, that is, lawlessness, chaos, anarchy, riots,

coup d'état. we offer a system that will stabilize and be responsible for legitimacy. and what is legitimacy here in jurisprudence in political science is illegality, that is, legality, compliance in the procedure. and this is the perception of a person by society, that the power is generally recognized, that its decision must be carried out. this is a very subtle psychological moment, and here the entire belarusian people's assembly will play a role and the second moment. this is the right of succession, why they were talking about 10-15 years, so that someone would not suddenly come to some incomprehensible person, and would not start to break everything. uh, let's talk straight to the young states. this often happens and you will see how to act on it in germa not. yes, there quickly everyone who suddenly thought there, somewhere on the internet, will immediately be found and imprisoned. we also need to have healthy

authorities, and the president. let's be honest, the founding father of a sovereign independent new belarus, that's the one that we have been living for 30 years. uh, so that this one, as i call him collective lukashenka, he continued , uh, to exist after lukashenka yes, yes. yes, this is the analogy i have. i am everything time to think about it. so, when we were choosing a place for a nuclear power plant, we were looking for a geological plate that would be large and motionless to an earthquake. here i have such an association that the entire belarusian people's assembly is the very same slab that is not subject to earthquakes, which are at the heart of the state. after all, we know that hierarchical systems are vertically vertical systems. they are subject to destruction in due time. we do not remember the collapse of the monarchy, the collapse of the soviet union, where there was also a vertical and it is necessary to build such a system,

which would be based on popular representation and regardless of the incidents that can occur vertically in power. if we simply say that the vertical is always, to one degree or another, about the elite. and here is the horizontal one. the history of vns is about the most. what exactly, if she is a nationality? yes, the second topic is still discussed, which is clearly closely related to the federal tax service - this is a political party. it was there that the president said clearly in the political field. uh, in my political field of the country , only those parties, activities, which corresponds to the basic principles of domestic and foreign policy to act from the citizens. and i, oleg sergeevich , assume that some of the opponents are already writing in such a vein, trying to distort what, yeah, this means a green corridor is being created, exclusively for pro-government parties. well , in short, those who will read it carefully, he will understand that there is no pro-government correspondence to domestic foreign policy - this is patriotism, but it does not determine, and there is a liberal democrat, there is a

socialist or a communist. yes, how are you do you see it for yourself? why are those who are trying to distort wrong here. this i will tell you. so there are no people and countries where everyone has the same opinion. it's true. and that's what political parties are for. they can be criticized and should be criticized that they are not perfect. but a person can express his point of view, either in legal politics, or on the street . god forbid the street, only the legal political path is further. the street, too, may be legal. if it is framed accordingly, we are talking about the street when uh, yes, and destruction, so now it goes on. did someone say either in the new law or the president yesterday at the meeting said that one cannot criticize one can criticize one can have a different point of view one can not oppose the history of the state. this means giving in against the people, which we are now talking about once and there is in some country of the world that teaches all democracies allow the existence of political parties that will come out and say i am against the existing constitution we want to destroy everything and start

acting. first, i will give a simple example. how can there be a party in the country that opposes the state symbols under which we live and which has been accepted by all the people. and we had such parties. they have not yet been eliminated. someone. is it possible to be a party that speaks openly. we will completely change the geopolitical vector of the country's development, we will destroy all ties, therefore i translate and explain to criticize, it is possible and necessary to argue this development of the country, but within the framework of the constitution, a will stand above all of us in own belarusian assembly. like this slab, where we will know that the people at the entire official assembly determined the course such and such, and we will argue how to come to these decisions, how to make people live better, so that healthcare is better educated, the economy, but the country does not destroy and this is a normal civilized way. uh, we will pass the law on political parties in the near future in parliament yesterday, after it will go to parliament now. we will discuss it. there will be another discussion, and in the end, all

this will strengthen our state. that is, i am in olga grigoryevna is convinced of this, in fact, we see, if we look at the oldest, probably such a party system, political great britain, then we will see conservatives or baristas there, and they fight hard with each other. we see this, they have a culture of behavior in parliament in general. absolutely wild for us, but it has developed historically, that is, culture. it’s not chaos, it’s happening there even though they seem to be radically different, while both patriots and those others know the limits, having gone beyond which they will be considered traitors to the motherland and relevant legislation will work against them. that is, such a mechanism is proposed now. well, yes, of course, i absolutely agree with you that this exists in all countries. eh, we really need a dialogue between the parties, probably, at some acute moments we need strategic sports, but uh, this is what we are doing, it seems to me, this is, uh,

such a belarusian experience to teach parties to talk to each other, because that we do not have much experience in party building. and uh party uh not too popular among the population and it will be quite difficult to explain which party to choose, because they will have to learn how to talk not only among themselves, but also with the population to do ordinary advertising to attract them. e voters party members. this is such a very complex mechanism. a and e vns. uh, i think yes, this will be the platform that will allow. e, to unite all these multidirectional currents, but, and the e parties should not rely only on the navy, they should. create your own political culture, your political field, in which they will work in the national assembly - these are not proportions. it's a little. this is a little different , we should have two two platforms. these are political parties. it's uh, vns. eh, and eh, vns.

still, this is not an answer. and on some external pressure, this is what we were going for. we had it for a long time from the very beginning and we are just completing this process today, and not starting it. let's continue. he has a few more important topics to discuss. i think that one way or another, because we have already touched upon, we will continue to talk about sovereignty. this is indeed one of the main features of the state. we see that today hail has been knocked down all the time, just these days there is a powerful surge of tension around serbia cosmos president vučić called the night of december 12 the most difficult night in his life, the aggravation began after the prime minister's collection, divulged by the republic of kosovo said that the nato contingent would clean the roads in the north. barricades built by the kosov serbs, which means that he actually put forward an ultimatum if the serbs were not dispersed by nato, then the local police would go into action. vucic spent an emergency meeting of the security council accused the united states and, above all, of non-compliance with the agreements reached earlier on space germany considers

serbia's plans to ask nato to deploy its armed forces in the coconut unacceptable. this statement by the head of the german foreign ministry burbock is noteworthy that a new round of tension happened literally a week after the historical one. as participants in the eu summit called it, the western balkans in tyranny. and now borisovich himself what kind of partners turned out to be a week ago. they patted the cleaner on the shoulder and talked. here is the balkans, we are one family here, and today is this. well, everything, the fact is that the balkans are full of contradictions even between fraternal countries that have one language, one religion, and they are even ethnically the same. take the serbs, take the croats, take the montenegrins. you see, it means that montenegro was the last to break away from serbia. and before that, slovenia and croatia had great contradictions, and these contradictions are played by western countries

that do not want a stable coalition of slavic countries to form, er, which are allied russia of the pre-war confrontation. here will come now. well i think that learn understands that from a military point of view. uh, serbi can’t oppose anything to the nato bloc, and given that the largest military base of the united states is located on the territory of kosovo, uh, that means u eastern europe, i think that, of course, it will not come to military action. unless there's some kind of spontaneous wildfire. understandably interesting americans. everything is clear here. already about it they said one base is worth what? ah, besides this factor of destabilization in the european union, well, why do europeans need it? it would seem unnecessary, but we eat, burbock. we see a barrel, which is clearly on the side. here in this conflict, on the side of the brishnah, there are also

few migrants undermining ukraine and little tension in turkey and greece. they need to blow up more of the balkans, which means they will sink faster than food. i just want to say that we are somewhat, perhaps misleadingly, placing emphasis, please, all this policy is determined, the united states of america. everyone. these politicians have compromising evidence of the united states, see the statement of the mother, merkin, which in general, according to such a mother to whom the stepmother, after such statements, you know, undermined her political career, there are experts who believe that there is compromising evidence about merkel’s ties with the stasi, which allows the united states of america manipulate her. and this is her and the statement that the minsk agreements were just a gain of time to strengthen the army of ukraine is a demonstration for russia that in europe it’s impossible to negotiate with anyone

, only with the united states it was worth the macron to declare that he was ready to negotiate there, we will ensure the interests of russia, it was worth the seams. there is someone else, as a statement immediately followed, which was supposed to show putin that there are no people in europe with whom we must understand, serbia is in a very difficult situation, that is, and they have extremely limited maneuver for for action. remember they imposed sanctions against belarus. they didn't want to russia, uh, they haven’t introduced yet in relation to belarus they were forced to introduce them. we understand very well, although by and large they should remember how lukashenka flew there in 1999 . i remember under the bombardments. i remember remember, and so we are somewhere, despite the fact that this decision was unpleasant. well, we understand, but the second point is that you are asking whether there will be a military confrontation or there will be no fight. why does such statements fight defending the interests of europe all his statements over the past year, they are destroying the european union, and this is including if

the americans will need a military conflict, it will be, and they will keep this conflict smoldering on purpose, for which the worst thing for them is a strong, powerful europe without splits, which can really become a competitor for the united states. it is not necessary. ukraine will start to lose even more. they understand that ukraine will lose ukraine will never win this conflict. what else do they have? they also have transnistria moldova, where you can play around, you can play in central asia, they will try around russia, but in europe itself, why, to kosovo and serbia the world for what they need it? and they have given rise to this conflict all their lives. uh, how it all began, who destroyed yugoslavia, who split it, and who controls kosovo, who forced it to recognize and create an international precedent, who are all the business corporations, they finance who owns cellular communications in coconut, the americans belong to the americans, therefore, if they will need it, but they will not do it. but if europe was truly independent, if germany

really wanted to be the leader of the european union today, if there was a world to expel the americans, sit down at the negotiating table and agree on a completely different story, but europe would be here, i would not agree that the european union is acting purely as a spider of the americans here, why? because she remembers that it was not america that began to destroy yugoslavia. but in general, the first geopolitical operation of the frg gensha, croatia, slovenia and the european union, the task is to include serbia in the composition before the year 25. and the condition for this inclusion is the recognition of kosovo as independent. how can you admit it now there is a strong pressure on the time when russia is diverted to a special military operation, the second moment, a gas pipeline from turkey passes through serbia, which supplies gas to hungary and europe, this is one of the few

after explosions in the northern streams and a stop in pol e, a gas pipeline flow through poland, which must also be stopped and a small armed conflict with the undermining of this gas pipeline. that's all, maybe. uh, believe that here we are now reaping our strategic union state and russia in the zero years, when we were obviously making a mistake with the west, because serbia then asked for a union state and its dkb. she was also an observer to the eurasian union. it could have been included, but we did not offer it at the moment when it was possible to do so, roadmaps for integration today, unfortunately, we have one. we are reading messages from mikusova will officially transfer the application for eu accession trying to use the application and already the status of a candidate for eu membership has been received by bosnia herzegovina with a problem that has been and on which, by the way, turkish

influence in the region claims. and olgievna. we touched upon the topic, indeed merkel yes, we saw this revelation when she said that, in fact, the minsk agreements were a screen, everyone already understood that this is absolutely fake. we saw their faces, which then in the palace of independence we saw real achievements, which were in the end. do you think she will ever admit that, among other things, it will forever remain on her conscience that they never finished these minsk agreements in order to prevent what we are now seeing, for example, in ukraine. merkel's position caused a mixed reaction not only in our country, but also in the west. here, i would pay more attention to this and, uh, in austria, a very noisy statement has already followed. yes, look, it means these austrian chancellor hein with christian fine speaking, and at the round table, which is dedicated to ukraine, he said, it scares with some kind of frankness frau. merkel talks about it. thus. we destroy any basis

for trust. and yes, so here, as it were the reaction from europe is more important. uh, does mrs. merkel, uh, ever admit to what she meant by those words ? well, i think that, of course, it will happen. although it will be such a difficult moment. we must understand what she is saying. this is in the conditions of an island of crisis that is taking place in relations with russia and it is largely connected, and the common european position, in addition, it is under very serious pressure. in connection with the fact that it was she who pushed through, as they call it now, gas. uh, these contracts, a and therefore she is compelled, of course, to talk about her own specific political line. and so with such luggage, surely she has for the number of years that she spent in power in germany, the largest state of the european union, if there are many positive moments and the support of the population.

even this does not allow her to be immune from pressure, so it turns out. well, of course, i think that today all european politicians are under such severe pressure. i would not talk about pressure , namely pressure and the fact that all of them even the former should express, but a certain position in relation to, uh, russia, and to the conflict that is taking place. well, i think there is still a moment and responsibility, which will come later. i think that each of them, uh, very seriously thinks about the fact that the conflict will someday end, how it will end, while it is not clear to everyone a and everyone thinks about their responsibility, that is, lays some bricks of how this will be explained further. here i would add that merkel has dramatically changed her position, because she is over the course. here this just 22 years has been criticized for being very soft-spoken and advocating for dialogue. and then abruptly. she retired , afraid that she would be taken away, would have been silent,

would have been a heroine in the west. uh, there is such a culture of censure, the so-called line, and it is very effective today. this is the most powerful psychological pressure that matters. what can it be, and the confession of the reasons for merkel’s behavior is this. this is the strongest information fund that really puts a lot of pressure on them now, but briefly merkel not only deceived all the jews, everything on throughout how she was a castrir contradicts what she said, she and the gas agreement. pushed ideologues and was much. sincerely, when they forgot about merkel, let her justify herself to her citizens before history later, but what about the coup d'etat in germany? this is generally some kind of just sorry for the expression. here is the circus. uh, here's the scholz ordered. here's to someone that he had his ratings it took that there will be more and more such coups d'etat in europe now. yes, that means against the backdrop of growing protests dissatisfaction with

the german population of the european union economic situation, political situation. it is necessary in some way to return people to the fold, loyalty, or at least fear, therefore, a set of measures is underway, the first intimidation of a nuclear war, it is not russia to raise this topic in belarus with a nuclear threat. tomorrow the war will strike tomorrow so that the europeans will sit hungry and cold, lord, okay, what is here, the second they want to destroy our country with a coup. tomorrow the nazis will come to power. salo, which is there rewritten on the network. what kind of coup is funny to watch, it's like a serious policy, but in the information media, because the world is ruled by information, uh, the media is power. now in europe there is one lie every day and a person wakes up and frightens him. yesterday, the coup was prevented and the fascists were detained. they shot you in a nuclear war. maybe tomorrow it will start and the next one is scary. i’ve thought of something else, tomorrow you’ll still be losing weight

, and sergeevich turns out, which means, but they put pressure on the opposition in the form of an alternative for germany it has strengthened the police presence in the cities, they have raised a lot, the rating, it turns out that it is the most profitable today, that it sits and rejoices. why did the entire ruling european. empire. brussels profitable call it what you want. i would be in this garnier, which, as it were, we were given two moments, i saw this power outage, which, as it were, the main one of the main reasons was called and the terrorist device warmed up. yes, this is something that is connected with reality, and not henry there some thirteenth seventy years old, 13, now he will answer for everything, and today energy problems . crisis it is one of the most acute and

it is obvious that winter is coming, and, as it were, this whole information agenda, it is very dense, so it will be necessary and now it is clear and necessary to take more stringent measures, but this is a super- democratic state, it is necessary to give some democratic settings so that people understand. uh, why is this happening, but i have more more scares. this is a realistic threat, because its introduction is already at the first stage, when else the trial did not take place, it means that there will be a very strict centralization of power. and if we are talking about belarus, then i would not see any danger here. and when we talk about germany and about the fact that power is beginning to be concentrated, then i would see a very alarming bell here. he immediately throws us back to the thirties, when they already went through these processes twice in germany and. uh, even in the middle ages, uh, in germany it was necessary to disperse the here so that it did not pose a danger. i want to continue the thought that sounded here

comparing e with germany in the thirties. the point is that historical analogies arise. remember the arson of the restaga. and here is an attempt. uh, well let's say destroy the bundestag and kidnap the chancellor. why was this done ? having come by the democratic path of the classics, hitler decided to completely clear the political field to destroy the positional party that could interfere with him, therefore, the largest political party of communist germany , due to arson, the reichstag, practically completely destroyed. here we suggest an analogy, but here it is not the communist party of opponents, the ruling alternative for germany is obvious that this is the way, yes in order to destroy the alternative and many say fascisization is taking place fascisization of germany and obviously we are witnesses of this process, two more important ones. we need to discuss topics. we are continuing another

important topic, the topic of geopolitical appetites for our western neighbor. warsaw, a lot is now being written on this subject of various materials, but, probably, most, capaciously. this is still a statement by the head of the russian foreign intelligence service, sergei naryshkin , who said, let me remind you, warsaw is speeding up preparations for the annexation of western ukrainian lands, the territories of lviv ivan frankivska and most of the ternopil region of ukraine, this is consistent with the strategy of poland in the 21st century. well, let's now listen to the chairman of the euro-atlantic association in poland, mark nowakovsky. this person believes that the strategic goal of poland is the expulsion of russia to asia, the expulsion from the club, the superpowers, and on the way to this goal there are another segment of russia from the shortest transit route to europe that is, to pull out of the union state. whom?

in your telegram channel, you have detailed the republic of belarus, piotr , both the context of this statement and the possible consequences. share your thoughts, please. here, when novakovsky's zhemarkok, this is not some kind of marginal. this is the head of one of the central think tanks, which organized expert support for poland's accession to the eu and nato, today interacts at an expert level with uh nato and the european union on the so-called euro-atlantic e, solidarity, so he actually recognizes poland as a proxy for the forces of the collective west and sees this as a national interest more. what a national interest it is scary to voice, but it is important for them. here is the zone of contact with the eurasian union, the union state is to move to the east, and for belarus and ukraine ukraine to be at war with russia poland and poland

get everything from this. uh, the most delicious dividends, that is, cheap labor. uh, sales markets and in fact. uh, the puppet government and the states on this account they finance norovetsky recently said about this and admitted the same tikhonovskaya of the same fugitives and others, and so on, because in addition to the theoretical base, if practically steps on this subject on the eve of the ministry of internal affairs of belarus reported that the received information about the creation of a paramilitary extremist formation in poland lithuania. that is, the unification is already underway, and, the commonwealth violates the structural divisions included in it, the tools of their goal organization, encroachments on the territorial integrity of sovereignty, the basis of the constitutional order of public security of the republic of belarus and the day before. we have seen both in social networks. i think our viewers have already seen the statement. here are the interviews again and again when these fighters are here. these detachments of weapons, they say, ukraine for us, we are warming up. we're warming up here. and then we

go to belarus, so they did not hide this in the twentieth year, the density of such statements is becoming more and more, to talk about what about the fact that polish instructors have been allocated money, er, they are preparing specific saboteurs, extremists and terrorists. this is also recognized by polish experts. e, the head of the polish geopolitical society, the kola pro. this has been said for a long time, that is, poland is preparing to destabilize the situation in belarus by expanding the war zone to our territory. here is their task. they created the entire infrastructure for this. unfortunately, they also want this for a reason. what should we talk about the reasons, here, uh, that plan, which said the head of russian intelligence. here's what we need to understand. the first annexation of ukraine is already underway. and today ukraine is already dividing it, what it owns, it has nothing for me. she, if before the beginning of her life , she had such, you know, at least elementary

remnants of sovereignty and property. today, they have to give back what they have not yet given away for 100 years, and children and grandchildren will no longer give up, and western ukraine is already quietly buying up and belongs to non-ukrainians for a long time, as far as we are concerned. the most important in this regard, it is that without us, without belarus , to implement the plans of poland and the west in general, in this context, the weakening and destruction of russia is impossible, and the conclusion for us alone will not lag behind us anywhere. not in the twenty- fourth, not in the twenty-fifth. not in the thirtieth. we must forget these illusions. if someone says now, everything is fine. it all ended there. it has not ended lukashenka every day, says at every meeting that nothing has ended including the podmedny media that, for the first time, he said this, others said before. he did not say souss president. it sounds completely different, that he is well

aware of the plans of the west in the twentieth year, which means op, uh, the destruction of belarus and attacks on the russian federation , unleashing a war, if the special operation had not begun, the president said about this, now my friends are returning to the twentieth year , which someone may be tired of discussing, but no one yet understands that in the twentieth year. if being here, god forbid, it started turned out coup d'etat, there would be a war, only for this we are needed for the war with russia, as ukraine did, uh, this poor unfortunate ukrainian people for the war, and the belarusian people would be used for the war against their will for the war and only for the war there would be no other way maybe, therefore, one conclusion no one will lag behind. no one will be left behind theoretical units will be introduced here. do you think there will be an offensive? a shelf of some kind is not how it's done. ah, there will be a return here to the territory of belarus of our citizens, who were recruited, they will infiltrate into ordinary life. then there are terrorist attacks that

will go around the country, undermining, destabilizing the situation, the unfinished will pop up, the fifth column, the political one, which will suddenly say we are going to the polls. we changed our minds, we are going to fight, that is, for this, in everything we must be ready for, the war begins in the 21st century. a little differently than june 22 with the bombing. come on, we have slightly erased the word hybrid war, and in general, the main meaning of this concept, as nato ideologists explain. it's all dirty work on the territory of the state should be carried out by citizens of these countries, that is, with the support of financial instructor ideological economy. that is, now we are in a state of a certain phase. the hybrid war against belarus is, first of all, an economic war. this is a political war, but the next phase is a proxy war, that is,

an attempt by the hands of those people who are announced by the armed belarusian opposition to break through the belarusian border here to organize a kind of window. here malorita sounds that the capture by these armed oppositionists district center and through this window on the territory of belarus a stream of pmc fighters of pmc volunteers of various kinds of vacationers of the polish army should gush. and in general, any trash from all over the world is an attempt to unleash a civil conflict, usually behind a civil conflict, foreign military intervention and , in fact, that’s why our president called for the deployment of a regional grouping of troops here as a precautionary measure, but sergei correctly said that given our most important geopolitical position, that belarus practically holds its hands the heart of russia is moscow's central

industrial district. and if this territory is occupied. to put it bluntly, minato’s troops would then keep moscow and protect it from a blow, and conventional and weapons of mass destruction would be almost impossible, it would be possible to dictate any conditions to moscow. i believe that poland is only making a bid for great power status yet and does not actually have the capacity to allow it to annex. there is a good expression about annexation. do not rush. and it's like we we'll see ahead, but it seems to me that we are more a little overestimating and underestimating ourselves, and on the agenda, in the informational one, we somehow connect ourselves. e with russia and, e, the value of belarus for poland in itself. she's kind of bogged down. here, it seems to me that there are more steps that she is taking to strengthen her defense ability. they are connected not only with the russian federation but

also with the strengthening of belarus itself. and i also think that the poles are not so unambiguous about the potential of belarus, including their political and those statements that she makes about raising rates and are connected precisely with this. i would also watch it this way, because time moves on. here we will be remembered for 100 years for 100 years. and now we have to prepare like this, if suddenly they just have something in the head of this stupid polish elite. remember 100 years you will remember that you climbed into belarus like your ancestors, nothing will happen. er, still. i would like to get out of this very dense discussion to some kind of vectors, you know, on what fairways. on what should be the focus of our society's attention. so we started by saying that there is a global understanding of ourselves in the state. yes, because the improvement of the constitution this is democracy in the form of an updated vns, and political parties that will approach more responsibly to the understanding that you

are not only fighting for power. but you, as a patriot, are fighting for power in parallel. we see that the state is working to not stand alone against threats in a. sami testified in bishkek that the president invites his partners. not only strengthen ties within. union not only well , finally, to abandon the barriers, when not now he proposes to scale up and already hold summits together with the sco together with the brix , that is, we see that our authorities, they have a clear understanding of where and where we are going from here to all of us what is necessary for this path to be the most effective, it is the outer contour of all the proposals of belarus e, they are e stable for a long time. we're just not too so paid attention to it in the past. but today this is clear, and what is being proposed by belarus is, first of all, proactive work so that we do not fit in, then at some stage, but form a new

reality, about which we are talking a lot right now and the finance system. here is the circulatory system, which was such an expression that diverged from it. this is exactly the stabilizer that is needed today, if we are talking about industrial cooperation, then this story is long. can be done at once then financial matters within. er, i'm eu and wider for the region. this is what needs to be done now is what will stabilize on us. it is very important for us today to preserve and increase sovereignty , ensure security and economic development. and this we can do. let's speak honestly in the world when it is divided into blocks only in this way, when we make our clear priority. and we will implement this priority. this is the idea of ​​the president of belarus that let's make the eu platform plus sco plus brix for our

an export-oriented economy is very important for our security system. today we must influence the emerging new architecture of the collective east and play not the last violin there. yes , we are 9.5 million citizens, but there is an example of a european one, that is, over holland, belgium is also a small country, but they are included and very well included. unlike the baltic states, the same thank you. yeah. here the idea was voiced that belarus is playing ahead of the curve - this is absolutely true and the point here is not only in the economy, but really in changing architecture of the world. we see that this is the global policy that was previously carried out by the strange collective west, but it is now in crisis and, on the contrary, the east is now on the rise, countries are developing not only in terms of economy, but also in terms of awareness of their place in this world. and in general, we understand that we are on the way with these countries, which are now

determined by the coach of world development and determine, uh, progressive development. we still hope that the world does not expect regression and gloomy and the future is not the death of civilization. and nevertheless, further development has taken place. i think that's exactly why the president. to integrate into this part of humanity with this part of humanity. and in general, belarus should not just be as they say, like everyone else, but it should find its place and stand out in this general diversity. as they say in this flower garden, our color should be red-green. everyone is visible. i sometimes understand people who, looking at the events taking place in the world around us, would like us to close our merke and only deal with their problems and lived quietly anywhere, without interfering, despite these hypolytic processes will not work. the trouble is that they won't give it, and today there is a plus one. so, when i

saw lukashenka’s last statement on a joint mustache, then on the idea of ​​further integration within the eu, we discussed a lot in this studio a model of the future that we can offer countries in the soviet space belarusians russia today i see this model of the future. i see that it is in the head and the president is very clearly formulated. as to protect our national interests and how to make not only russia, but the entire post-soviet space stronger, and in my opinion, the only way to do this now is for everyone to do their job as a politician, their economist as a military man, and so on. i think that everything will work out for us. thank you very much for participating in this conversation in this program. all is happy for today.

and here i am hello, probably, we are the only ones in the republic of belarus who still produce the good old tasty moscow sausage exactly according to the gost recipe show the stash where you have a sandwich with sausage happily be the one and only museum of mopeds, the only one in belarus ah-ah. it's still the moon. it's just, what a rare story a woman fucks, it's not a dig. it's lightly hammered. but no, the second leg, she hid under and she, as it were, has no fantasy at all, see a good knapsack with svetlana borovskaya on our tv channel. and in the world of science and discoveries made by belarusian scientists, cells are cells of multicellular organisms that

live multiply in skillful conditions, cell culture can be obtained from almost any organ or tissue. the effect of iron deficiency treatment depends primarily on the daily dose of iron that we consume per day and here is the duration of therapy, which is currently being worked on in the laboratory, the country's leading scientific institutes in this regard. we are also developing the direction of developing a new generation vaccine. this is a recombinant vaccine, a vector vaccine, watch the popular science project science mania on our tv channel. walk around the belarusian cities and find out their history. you know that at one time the place

was the child of the city. once the great vitov laid eyes on it and built a wooden castle here, which stood on this place for more than 200 years to plunge into the past and see how legendary personalities lived. this is how the study of the people's writer looked like, this typewriter immediately catches the eye. that's just on it and you shamyakin. never typed. his wife took care of it. and also experience vivid emotions. from something new come on, mommy mommy. nothing to do with it, they dress up everything this and even more can be done while watching the project of the city of belarus to light industry. you can even omit this, because in fact the production process is

very complicated, but difficult. it all depends on the person, even on his attitude to his work. well, our people. i consider everyone in their place, watch on our tv channel.

sunday broadcast on belarus 1 continues the noon news in the studio vladislav bondar hello, watch the releases of the increase in mutual trade and increase in investment the eurasian economic union sums up of the year