channel so what is belarus like? business and developing hospitable bright and festival picturesque sports and team

we tell you not only about significant events, we introduce you to active, energetic and inspiring people who live in belarus and do everything for its development, belarus can be different to understand and feel. she needs to be seen with her own eyes. hello dear viewers on the air of belarus 24 tv channel. watch us every day. after all, we are doing, belarus is closer.

hello welcome everyone. who is with us now? we have, of course, a lot of topics of global importance that have accumulated, we will deal with it, and we often start from this international with the global. however, today we will break the format, let's start today with us. here is an absolutely clear and understandable example. how do you have to respond to pressure, and, perhaps, one of the most resonant

fragments of the personnel day for the presidents on monday, which, firstly, charged a leader, and secondly, showed all the decisiveness in response to any pressure from outside i listen to some. ukrainian polish or finnish hosts people remain technologies remain in production there are electrodes. needs ready to go your president. uh, the issue of a change of ownership is now being resolved. and i think that next year he will start to work gone. goodbye. we don't know you. you don't want to know us what change of ownership the enterprise has been nationalized from now on, what we are still waiting for, what change of ownership. and how will we solve the issue of the government for half a year it is considered

that this enterprise is yours gone? wave to them make the sign of the cross with your hand that they have left you property. for example, mcdonald's said this, it worked and people come and produce products normally. but this enterprise of ours didn’t want to, the americans or whoever the kazakhs russians are to work? well, as you wish, our people are not dumber, so that, as i said , cut this bun and shove it there, lettuce leaves or a piece, sausages are exactly the same here, everything is already left, and they didn’t take anything with them. but if they took it, then i would take off the heads of responsible people, no one shouldn't take anything. you must not allow this. well we binge on your area talking responsibility ikea oh ikea well goodbye. those stools are there. uh, other studios

did what we can't do, especially if they didn't take anything and people stayed, the owner left, go ahead fair approach i would not consider injustice only from the point of view of justice. here, of course, the question is very deep and multi-layered, because we are talking about economic components, first of all, we provided conditions for work for foreign investors the owner and to date. they leave enterprises for political reasons and leave us problems about them - this is the fact that people do not work, our people who live in the regions, and here is the delay in this process, of course, it is wrong, and from a legal point of view, it is not so easy to solve this issue here the moment is not only dragging out, but in order to create the right precedent for belarus to show some new practice of how these issues can be resolved, and for

political reasons, i absolutely. eh, i agree with the approach that it needs to be dosed somehow either by economics or politics, when we start mixing all sides, so i would approach this. that's just how it is for now. i would say that the first president defends the national interests of the country, the national interests of our economy, including the second from a legal point of view, the parliament will adopt any bills. i say now about it openly, which will legally fix this third. i would like this meeting with the president to be broadcast on all russian media the fact that the president, when he says not to take a single nail, not to take anything out of what has been done here technology has been brought to belarus? why did belarus create some conditions for investors to work quietly here, did belarus not provide all the conditions for foreign enterprises to develop. it is true, the third point,

why they leave, because the conditions are not forcing them to leave. this is another truth and forced to leave. this means that this is purely politics, the fourth moment of international law, if we talking about legal issues. why do i say that in russia they watched this meeting and did as our president does. i watch, sometimes russian news and i'm surprised guys there is a war with you. everything, in fact, they take you to europe, america, your oligarchs will strip you to your underpants. this means that the company's accounts are being frozen. and you are still sitting. saying. some french company is leaving. let's agree. let's have some conditions. what conditions, if wanted to smell they and swift turned off today all the red lines passed. why swift is not turned off and it is not profitable for me. they are afraid of those who say that here we are scary to scare away her hinges, why they are not that we will never change the legislation on invest about investors a conscientious investor. how it worked here

and will work more than that, look at the statistics. since the beginning of the year. first of all, first of all these events, investors, belarus, how did they go, the question is where are they going today? they're not coming from dill today they're coming close to 100 central asia means the asian market is china and that's fine. but also one let's tell the truth. let's say, remember the statement of one lithuanian official who is extremely concerned that the ilitian european businessman is doing everything to circumvent the sanctions imposed by the european union and enter the russian belarusian market. here's the truth the truth is that european investors don't want runaway investors. it's not about the economy. it's about politics when they leave our national interests. we have an obligation to defend ourselves. this time and the second, our actions would be even more effective if russia and all post-soviet countries space. let them see that the only way it's like this is heard. this sergey is now on the other side. why are there no international

precedents? it seems to me that after our skies were closed without trial or investigation, and icao still produces some reports of its own. and we already had all the airspace installed . i think after that. we received a green corridor for any decisions to protect national cooperation, the kiev regime actually arrested and stole, and there property worth millions of dollars in the form of the form of a wagon of racing enterprises. e, those, e sets that were supposed to be assembled into an electric bus, trolleybus and such precedents can be in lithuania. show our terminal in the port of klaipets, there are enough of them. i would like to emphasize here a little. eh, just one more moment. here, if we compare russia belarus here, look, the russian federation made a bet in the 1900s on a foreign investor and, in fact, a foreign investor took control. e plant in togliatti kamaz other, when they

left for political, everyone is well aware of the political on the topic of the russian federation has lost these competencies. when we talk about the form of ownership and when strategic industries are in state ownership, it is clear that these investors are not strategic. then we are talking about the economic sovereignty of our state. we saw this if we did not have such an economic basis as the mason tk our huge industries. imagine if they belonged to someone abroad, and they would have left so that we could do this. and remember, at one time there was this pursuit to increase the share of small and medium-sized businesses, and, for some reason, it was proposed not to do this in parallel with the development of a large city-forming one. uh, there is a set of enterprises, and it is to harness large enterprises. we will now take it outside the city, not realizing that these strikes actually offered this sale of large large enterprises to bet on the so-called

average here. it is probably important to indicate that in including for those of our viewers who may be watching us abroad, that we are not trying to call the platform now, that now boya is a foreign enterprise, we specialize in a speech about what is for belarus - this story is exceptional and forced, given that it was once credit of confidence to those enterprises that were allowed to enter these sites and now the state has obligations to the population that works when these investors came to remind me. the president set the task. and for these enterprises to be, for the sovereignty of the republic belarus did not oppose the republic of belarus and b so that enterprises were socially oriented. we are a social state, what we see here is an enterprise, or rather, the owners of these enterprises turned out to be politically biased and the second point. they, uh, abandoned their social obligations, that is , they violated the two basic conditions with which they came to the republic of belarus, uh, but we

also see the relations of our country. that is, we do not liquidate these enterprises, we do not destroy workers. this is not the first time, a necessary measure. let's remember a communal apartment in the early 1990s, when some owner somehow got this communal apartment back in the early nineties. there, in the ninety-second year, he left for the united states of america. then i simply exploited this enterprise, bringing it to a slightly semi-bankrupt foreign state. this is the kind of sanction that the west is trying to use against us, so we are responding to the sanction in this way, but i want one small moment. remember the average dream of any entrepreneur in belarus or russia is sure, when you spill out, open an account abroad to buy some kind of real estate there and transfer part of your assets there. unfortunately it's true. now what is the plus, and in this way we have been feeding europe all the welfare of europe at the expense of us for 30 years, and now it is over. now. i think every entrepreneur in the

country. and we must support them and will support them, we must finally understand that the only way to save your money is the only way to become successful. it is to develop your own country. and god forbid that in russia it is heard, of course there is. i would look at this issue even more broadly, not only in terms of national security policy. we now see an attempt within the framework of a hybrid war, using both politics and economics and informational pressure, to defeat the country, given that the nuclear powers cannot use nuclear weapons, the potential is too great and everything threatens a complete catastrophe. no less effective measures of destruction are now being applied. e of the opposing state. it's right here. uh, such kind of economic diversions look, what happens in the russian federation there is not a single own ball bearing left, which caused the

production of ball bearings to stop. it seems like a trifle in moscow there were only two factories and now there is not one, and because of this, not a car. not planes, not tanks, not everything else, and they thank the belarusians for keeping our state-owned bearing plant in minsk. although there were proposals to close it for perspective, because there are swedish german chinese bearings. and now it turned out that when there was opposition on the verge of military action, that these are the factories that have been preserved in our country. they now play a strategic role. not only for our state, for the entire union state. let's go further in this, continuing the theme of the development of sovereignty, we saw a big meeting of its president the day before. development of sovereignty. in this case, creating such foundations of the state. hey whites. updated the constitution by referendum and accordingly. these are serious enough changes have taken place in certain articles and areas of fundamental change and,

accordingly, it is necessary to adapt the legislation to approach this reasonably the day before. the main thing of the most important questions was always the russian people's assembly and the poly party for a long time, so we saw that there was an attempt to find an image. this is what will happen. on the one hand, this updated status of the federal tax service is not a new phenomenon for us, but the updated presidents clearly said that this will be the stabilizer of the society. and this is its main role. if the need arises, then it will be necessary to negotiate on its site, and the second point, including at meetings, is the president, when he visited, labor collectives there, people periodically, when he came in. uh, this topic and they asked, and who will be in this in the nss. that's why it's about us that the president answered. the question is, who will be in? in vns? let's listen now to the composition of the vns. representatives of all strata of the belarusian society will enter. and this is the main point. well, i noticed that some labor collectives raised the question . but how empathetic there is no assembly

officials will be regular and so on, as labor collectives will be represented. well , maybe you didn't get through to people, didn't explain it to them, but representatives of labor collectives will have a percentage there. only the paths of movement to this meeting are somewhat different, not directly gathered. the plant nominated its representative, and after the belarusian people's assembly he was represented there by deputies and from the party of public organizations. all will be people. and this is labor collectives. these are teachers. this is the worker - these are the peasants - these are the doctors and so on. but it must be professionals. these are not wedding generals who came and sat. whoever understood something, didn’t understand something, served time, left, there shouldn’t be such people there, and we must do everything so that the delegates, returning to their workplaces,

report to the labor collectives on the issues that were considered at the entire belarusian people’s assembly. we will do it in the best way, despite the fact that there will be respected people in the national assembly. it cannot interfere with the activities of other organs. substitute for them to perform their functions belarusian the people's assembly, in fact, should be preserved, as a political institution they will develop into some kind of bureaucratic body. propaganda can be different, but this will not make them better understand what to do in real life. i will explain the author of the project

propaganda in detail consider widely. the topics discussed analyzes the facts, gives arguments and refutes rumors, any important decision at the state level should have a clear goal, why we are doing this, and the end results should be better for people. my name is igor tur. it was mine propaganda watch new episodes on belarus 24 tv channel. they can play not only with muscles, but also with their heads. in what sport? champions league champions league of course because of

its unusual shape for the correct answers , the participants will get points, and for the wrong loss, which of these players has more awards for the best player of the month in arsenal arshavin absolutely right or not? so what are we playing? which of these athletes belarus is on the left, watch the intellectually entertaining show heading on belarus 24 tv channel. extremely everything is clearly laid out, we are waiting now, when the parliamentarian will finally approve everything, yes olginovna. how are you? you see, this process, which the belarusians are now carrying out and pretending to

live, has brought in. this is a response to the request of society and this request is that horizontal communication. it should be the basis. this broad, representation means participation in the general population and responsibility. i think it's right inside. this is such mobility. he understands something, how can he some kind of horizontal, yes, move, because, uh, when we talk about the vertical, uh, we mean what aleksandrovich said, these are officials, and so that it does not turn. here in the collection of what they really have, but it is broad, representation and the main thing is responsibility. although it is not very rare for us to hear this word. we talk more about representation than responsibility. in fact, responsibility must be put in the first place. when people are involved in making any decisions, they must get used to taking responsibility not to say what is bad, but to suggest how to do better and take responsibility. i would consider it that way. i would like to make

two points. the first president thinks not only about what is happening now, because now i am going to visit the regions, people, on the contrary, are asking a question. listen, what kind of democracy is there. what are you doing there, in general, sometimes they ask such a situation like this. let our dad take everything into his own hands completely from beginning to end. and in general, so that everyone just sits and performs. and this, in in principle, it will cause an absolutely normal reaction in people now, but at the same time, i want people to hear that we are democracy, we are actually developing these bills that the president spoke yesterday, these are the people of power, but what does the president think about, as i see it, he thinks, that in 10-15-20 years to fate. belarus has never been resolved on the street, political issues have never been resolved with the help of a club with a stick, the confrontation of some political groups of groups. to do this, we introduced this entire belarusian assembly more moreover, this is a people's body after the referendum, because we can be proud of the people's constitution. remember how we accepted it, it was truly people's and it was

supported by the absolute majority of belarusians and the absolute majority of belarusians. everyone told the belarusian people's assembly to have a discussion. today, the president has failed, and finally, what is most important will not be the loosening of the balance of power. there is a parliament - this is the legislative power. there is a president of the council of ministers. the vertical is the executive branch. what is the whole russian collection a strategic political body that will not interfere with activities, for example, the liberal democratic party, but i will watch its decisions as the leader of the party, because the people have decided, and within the framework of these decisions we will argue with the communists. so uh, by the way, about sports yes, more about political parties. the most important thing is that the president said here that the entire belarusian people's assembly is responsible for the function. that's it. uh, recognition of the system's legitimacy and continuity. that's when we say stabilizer. this is actually our answer to the maidan. let's tell us directly that they wanted to make a ukrainian

scenario here in 2020. they have this negativity scenario, that is, lawlessness, chaos, anarchy, riots, coup d'état. we propose a system that will stabilize and be responsible for legitimacy. and what is legitimacy in jurisprudence in political science is illegality, that is, legality, compliance with the procedure. and this is the perception of a person by society, that it is generally recognized as power, that its decision is necessary fulfill. this is a very subtle psychological point here as well. the russian people's assembly will play a role and the second point is e succession. why did they talk about 10 15 years, so that someone would not suddenly come to some incomprehensible person, and would not start breaking everything. uh, let's just talk to the young states. this often happens. and you can see how it

works in germany. yes, there quickly everyone who suddenly thought there, somewhere on the internet, will immediately be found and imprisoned. we also need to have healthy authorities, and the president. let's so, to be honest, the founding father of the sovereign independent new belarus is the one we have been living in for 30 years. uh, so that this one, as i call him collective lukashenka, he continues to exist after lukashenka and yes, i have such taxes. i think about it all the time. so, when we were choosing a place for a nuclear power plant, we were looking for a geological one. a slab that was large was not subject to an earthquake. here i have such an association that the entire belarusian people's assembly is the same plate, strong, not subject to earthquakes, which is at the heart of the state. after all, we know that hierarchical systems are vertically vertical systems. they are subject. e in due time of the crash. we

remember the collapse of the monarchy, we remember the collapse of the soviet union where there was also a vertical and it is necessary to build a system that would rely on popular representation and would not depend on incidents that can occur in power verticality. if we simply say that the vertical is always, to one degree or another, about the elite. and here horizontal. history of vns. this is about what exactly, if she is a nationality? yes, the second topic is still, which was discussed honestly, of course. sns is a political party. that's where it sounded clearly in the political field and said the president. only those parties should work in my country's political field. of which it corresponds to the basic principles of domestic and foreign policy to act on behalf of citizens, and i, oleg sergeevich, assume that some of the opponents are already writing in this vein, trying to distort what, yeah, this means a green corridor is being created exclusively for pro-government parties, but every person who will read. this is careful. he will understand that there is not a word about the government's

compliance with domestic foreign policy. this is patriotism, but it does not determine whether a liberal democrat is a socialist or a communist. yes , but how do you see it for yourself? why is this not right. those who are trying to distort, i 'll tell you. so there are no people from a country where everyone has the same opinion. it's true, and that's what political parties are for. they can be criticized and should be criticized, which they are not perfect, but a person can express his point of view either through legal politics or on the street. god forbid the street, the only legal political way. further, that the street can also be legal, if we are talking about the street, when, uh, yes, chaos and destruction, so now we go further. did someone say either in the new law or the president yesterday at a meeting said that one cannot criticize one can criticize one can have a different point of view one can not oppose an empty state. this means you are yielding against the people, which we are talking about now. we say once there is in some country in the world that teach everyone about democracy allow

political parties to exist that will come out and say i am against the existing constitution we want to destroy everything and start acting. let me give you a simple example first. how can there be a party in the country that opposes the state symbols under which we live and which has been accepted by all the people. and you had such parties, and some that have not yet been liquidated. how can there be a party that speaks openly. we we will completely change the geopolitical vector of the country's development, we will destroy all ties, we will destroy it, therefore i am translating and explaining. you can criticize, you can and should argue this development of the country, but within the framework of the constitution and above all of us, the russian assembly will stand in itself. like this slab, where we will know that the people at the vsevolozhsk meeting determined the course such and such, and we will argue how to come to these decisions, how to make people live better, so that health care would be better educated, the economy, but the country will not destroys. and this normal civilized way. we will adopt

a law on political parties. uh, soon in parliament yesterday. after that, he will now go to parliament. we will discuss it. there will be more discussion and in the end all this will strengthen our state. that is, i am convinced that they won, but he says, in fact, we see, if we look at the oldest, probably such a party system in the political uk, then we will see conservatives and baristas there, and they are fighting hard with each other. we see this, they have a culture of behavior in parliament in general. absolutely wild for us, but it has developed historically, that is, the tours are not chaos, they have it there and despite the fact that they seem to be radically different, while both of them are patriots, both of them know the limits, having gone beyond which they will be considered traitors to the motherland and relevant legislation will work in relation to them. that is, such a mechanism is proposed now. yes, of course, i absolutely agree with you that this exists in all countries. uh, we really need a dialogue between the parties, probably, at some

critical moments we need a strategic sport, but what is being done here, it seems to me, is, uh, such a belarusian experience to teach parties to talk to each other, because we do not have much experience in party building. and the parties are not very popular among the population and it will be quite difficult to explain which party to choose, because they will have to learn how to talk not only among themselves, but also with the population to make ordinary advertising to attract voters. in the party it is such a very complex mechanism, a and e vns. eh, it seems to me, yes, it will be the platform that will allow. uh, to unite all these multidirectional currents, but e parties e should not rely only on the nss, they must learn to create their own political culture, their own political field in which they will work vns - these are not proportions. it

's a little. this is a little different, we should have two two platforms. these are political parties. this is vns. and vns, after all, this is not the answer. and for some external pressure, this is what we were going for. we have had it for a long time from the very beginning and we are just completing this process. today instead of starting it. let's continue with a few more important topics that need to be discussed. i think that one way or another, because we have already touched upon, we will continue to talk about sovereignty. this is indeed one of the main features of the state. we see that today hail has been knocked down for the whole time, just these days there is a powerful roll, tension around serbia is cosmic, on the night of december 12, president vučić called the worst night of his life, the aggravation began after prime minister sembo, publicized by the republic of kosovo kurti said that the contingent takes to the floor from the roads in the north of the barricade built by the kosovo serfs. that is, he actually put forward an ultimatum if the serbs are not dispersed by nato, then the local police will go into action. vučić held

an emergency meeting of the security council and accused the united states and, above all, of non-compliance with the agreements reached earlier on outer space. germany considers serbia's plans to ask nato to deploy its armed forces in kosovo unacceptable. this is a statement by the head of the german medberg, it is noteworthy that a new round of tension happened literally a week after historical. as the participants in the eu summit called the western balkans in iran, and here is borisovich himself. what kind of partners turned out to be a week ago? or here's another on the shoulder and said. there is the balkans, we are one family here, and today this is it. well, everything, the fact is that the balkans are full of contradictions even between fraternal countries that have one language, one religion, and they are even ethnically the same nation, take the serbs, take the croats, take the montenegrins. you see, it means that montenegro is the last to break away from

serbia and before that there were slovenia and croatia, the contradiction is great. and these contradictions are played by the countries of the west, which do not want a stable coalition of slavic countries to form, er, which are the allied russia of the pre-war confrontation. here you go now. well, i think that teaching understands that from a military point of view. uh, serbi can’t oppose anything to a bloc with nato, and given that the largest military base of the united states is located on the territory of kosovo. pre-war actions will not come. unless there's some kind of spontaneous wildfire. understandably interesting americans. everything is clear here. you have already said about this one base. what is it worth, and, besides, this factor of destabilization in the european union, but why do europeans need it? it would seem that this is not necessary, but we eat ber god, we see a barrel,

which is clearly on the side. here in this conflict, on the side, they also undermine and undermine little ukraine and little tension of turkey and greece with small grants, they need to blow up more the balkans will sink faster than food. i just want to say that we are somewhat, perhaps misleadingly, misplaced stocks, please, all this policy is determined, united states of america. it's just that all these policies are managed , it's obvious that i think at all. these waterings are compromising evidence of the united states, see the statement of mother merkel which in general, according to such a mother to whom her stepmother undermined her political career after such statements, there are experts who believe that compromising evidence has merkel's connections with the stasi, which allows the united states of america to manipulate it. and this is her and her statement that the minsk agreements were just a gain of time to strengthen, e, the army of ukraine is a

demonstration for russia that in europe it is impossible to negotiate with anyone, it is necessary to negotiate, only with the united states it was worth the macron to declare that he is ready there for the negotiation we ensure the interests of russia cost schwaltz. there is someone else, as a statement immediately followed, which was supposed to show putin what is not in europe there are no people in europe with whom we should understand, serbia is in a very difficult situation, that is, and they have extremely limited maneuver for action. remember they imposed sanctions against belarus. they didn’t want to, in relation to russia, they didn’t introduce it yet , they forced them to introduce it in relation to belarus. we understand very well, although by and large they should remember, how lukashenka flew there in 1999 under bombardments. i remember remember, and so we are somewhere, despite the fact that this decision was unpleasant. well, we understand, but the second point yet here you are asking whether there will be a military confrontation or there will not be a struggle. why does such statements fight to defend

the interests of not europe, all of his statements over the past year, they are destroying the european union, and this, among other things, if the americans need a military conflict, it will be and they will keep this conflict smoldering on purpose, for which they the worst thing is a strong, powerful europe without splits, which can really become a competitor for the usa. it is not necessary. ukraine will start to lose even more. they understand that ukraine ukraine will never lose in this conflict will not win. what else do they have? they also have transnistria moldova, where you can play around, you can play around in central asia, they will try around russia, but in europe itself , why should kosovo and serbia have peace, why do they need it? they have created this conflict all your life. uh, how it all began, who destroyed yugoslavia, who split it, and who controls kosovo, who forced it to recognize and create an international precedent, who all the business corporations finance there, who owns the cellular communications in

coconut, americans own everything , so if they need it , they will do it. but if europe was truly independent, if germany really wanted to be the leader of the european union today, the world would have to expel the americans to sit down at the negotiating table and agree on something completely different. the history of europe was. i would not agree here that the european union is acting purely on behalf of the americans here, why? because let me remind you that it was not america that began to destroy yugoslavia, but in general the first the political operation of the federal republic of germany, croatia, slovenia and the european union has the task of including serbia in the eu before the twenty-fifth year. and the condition for this inclusion is the recognition of kosovo as independent. as you can admit, now there is a strong pressure on the time when russia is diverted to a special military

operation. the second moment, a gas pipeline from turkey passes through serbia, which supplies gas to hungary and europe, this is one of the few after the explosions in the northern streams and the stop in pol e, through poland gas pipeline flow, which it is also necessary to stop a small armed conflict with the undermining of this gas pipeline. that 's all, maybe. e, i think that here we are now reaping our strategic union state and russia in the zero years, when we were stunned by the west's mistake, because serbia then asked for a union state and its dkb. she was also an observer to the eurasian union. it could have been included, but we did not offer it at the moment when it was possible to do so, roadmaps for integration today, unfortunately, we have one. we read media reports kosovo will officially submit an application for eu membership trying to use the application and already the status of a candidate

for eu membership has been received by bosnia herzegovina with the problems that turkish influence in the regions has been and is claiming by the way. and olguine. we touched upon the topic, indeed merkel yes, we saw this revelation when she said that, in fact, the minsk agreements were a screen, everyone already understood that this is absolutely fake. we saw their faces, which then in the palace of independence we saw the real achievements that were in the end. and do you think she will ever admit that, among other things, it will forever remain on her conscience that they never finished these minsk agreements in order to prevent what we are now seeing, for example, in ukraine merkel’s position it caused a mixed reaction not only among us, but also in the west. here, i would pay more attention to this and, uh, in austria, a very noisy statement has already followed. yes, these austrian chancellor hein with christian fine speaking.

moreover, at the round table, which is dedicated to ukraine, he said that he was frightened by some kind of frankness frau. merkel talks about it. thus. we destroy any basis for trust. and yes, that's why, as it were, the reaction from europe is more important. uh, does mrs. merkel ever admit what she meant by these words ? well, i think that, of course, it will happen. although it will be such a difficult moment. we must understand what she is saying. this is in the conditions of an island of crisis that is taking place in relations with russia and it is in connected in many ways, and the common european position, in addition, it is under very serious pressure. in connection with the fact that it was she who pushed through, as they call it now, gas. uh, these contracts, and so she is forced, of course, to talk about her specific political line. and so with such luggage, surely she has for the number of years that

she spent in power in germany, the largest state of the european union, if there are many positive moments and the support of the population. even this does not allow one to be immune from pressure is obtained. well, of course, i think that today all european politicians are under such severe pressure. i would not speak about the pressure of aggression and about what all of them, even the former, should express, but a certain position in relation to russia, and to the conflict that is taking place. well, i think there is still a moment and responsibility, which will come later. i think that each of them, uh, very seriously thinks about the fact that the conflict will ever end, how it will end, while it is not clear to everyone and everyone thinks about his responsibility, that is, lays some building blocks of how this will be explained in the future. here i would add that merkel has dramatically changed her position, because she is over the course. for only 22 years, this one has been criticized for being very gentle and beautifully advocating

dialogue. and then abruptly. she retired , afraid that she would be taken away, would have been silent, would have been a heroine in the west. uh, there is such a culture of censure, the so-called sharpness, and it is very effective today. this psychological most powerful pressure, which is the issue. what could be, yes, a few more important confession of the reasons for merkel's behavior . this is the strongest information fund. they are now really under a lot of pressure, but briefly merkel did not just deceive. all the ideas all over her time as a castrir contradict what she said, she and the gas agreements. i pushed the ideologists together and was much sincere when they forgot about merkel, let her justify herself to history before her citizens then, but the coup d'état in germany, what is this ? this is generally some kind of just sorry for the expression. here is the circus. uh, here's the scholz ordered. here's to someone that he gave me his rating.

it took me that there will be more and more such coups d'etat in europe now. yes, it means that against the backdrop of growing protests, the dissatisfaction of the german population of the european union, the economic situation, the political situation. it is necessary to somehow return people to the fold, loyalty, or at least fear, therefore, a set of measures is underway, the first intimidation of a nuclear war, not russia belarus this topic to raise the nuclear threat. tomorrow the war will strike tomorrow so that the europeans will sit hungry and cold. lord , this is the main thing. here, the second want to destroy our country with a coup. tomorrow the nazis will come to power. salo, who is rewritten there on the net. what kind of coup is funny to watch, it's like a serious policy, but in the information media, because the world is ruled by information, uh, the media is power. now in europe there is one lie every day and a person wakes up and frightens him. yesterday, the coup was prevented, the nazis were detained. they shot you in a nuclear war. maybe

tomorrow the next one will start, which is what scares me. putin has something else in mind. tomorrow you will still lose weight, sit and lose aleksandrovich , it turns out, which means, but they put pressure on the opposition in the form of an alternative for germany . they strengthened the police presence in the cities; why did the entire ruling european empire have to benefit ? call it what you want, great. i would be in this garnish, which, as it were, we were served two moments, i saw this power outage, which, as it were, was called the main one of the main reasons and the terrorist threat. history is warm. yes, this is something that is connected with reality, and not henry there, some thirteenth seventy-year-old data, 13,

will now answer for everything today. uh, energy crisis issues. it is one of the sharpest and it is obvious that winter is coming. and, as it were, this whole informational agenda, it is very much condensed, so it is necessary and now it is clear that it is necessary to take tougher measures, but since the state is super democratic, it is necessary to give some kind of democratic settings so that people understand. eh, why is this happening, but this realistic threat frightens me more, because its introduction is already at the first stage. when the proceedings have not yet taken place, it means that the centralization of power will be very tough. and if we are rome of belarus, then i would not see any danger here. and when we talk about germany and that power begins to concentrate, then i would see a very alarming bell here. he immediately throws us back to the thirties, when they already went through these processes twice in germany and. uh, even in the middle ages, germany needed to

be dispersed here so that it did not pose a danger. i want to continue the thought that came up here comparing e with germany in the thirties. the point is that historical analogies arise. remember the arson of the restaga. and here is an attempt. uh. well, let's say destroy the bundestag and kidnap the chancellor. for what it was done, coming in a democratic way of the classics. hitler decided to completely clear the political field to destroy the positional party that could interfere with him, so the largest political party in germany, the communist party, was almost completely destroyed due to the arson of the restag. here we suggest an analogy, but here is not the communist party opponents, the ruling alternative for germany is obvious that this alternative will not be a bunch. yes, in order to destroy the alternative and many say there is fascisization fascisation of germany and

obviously we are witnesses of this process, two more important topics. we need time to discuss. we are continuing another important topic, the topic of geopolitical appetites for our western neighbor. warsaw, a lot is now being written on this subject of various materials, but, probably, most, succinctly. this is still a statement by the head of the russian foreign intelligence service , sergei naryshkin, who said, let me remind you, warsaw is speeding up preparations for the annexation of western ukrainian lands of the territory of lviv, ivan frankivska and most of the ternopil region of ukraine, this is consistent with the strategic goal. poland in the 21st century. well, let's now listen to the chairman of the euro-atlantic association in poland, mark nowakovsky. this person believes that the strategic goal of poland is to oust russia into asia by expelling it from the club, superpowers, and on the way to this goal there is

another one to cut off russia from the shortest transit route to europe, that is, to wrest it from the union state. whom? you have detailed the republic of belarus and peter in your telegram channel and the context of this statement and the possible consequences. share your thoughts, please. here, when novakovsky's zhemarkok, this is not some kind of marginal. this is the head of one of the central thought factories that organized expert support for poland's accession to the eu and nato; today he interacts at an expert level with the e-e of nato and the european union on the so-called euro-atlantic e, solidarity and so he actually recognizes poland as a proxy for the power of the collective west and see it as a national interest later. which one it's scary to voice national interest, but it's important for them. that's the zone of contact with the eurasian union, the union state is to move to the east. and so that belarus and ukraine

ukraine are already at war with russia a. poland and poland got everything from this. uh, the most delicious dividends, that is, cheap labor . uh, markets and in fact. uh, the puppet government and the states on this account they finance marovetsky recently said this and admitted the same tikhonovskaya of the same fugitives and others, and so on, because in addition to the theoretical base, if almost steps on this score the day before, the ministry of internal affairs of belarus reported that they received information about the creation of a paramilitary extremist formation in poland and lithuania. that is, the unification is already underway, and, in violation of the commonwealth, the structural subdivisions of the weapons included in it, their goal is the organization of encroachments on the territorial integrity of sovereignty, the basis of the constitutional order of public security of the republic of belarus and the day before. we have seen both in social networks. i think our viewers have already seen the statement. here again and again an interview when these fighters.

these detachments of weapons, they say, ukraine for us, we are warming up. we're warming up here. and then we go to belarus, so they did not hide this in the twentieth year. the density of such statements is becoming more and more, in order to satisfy that the polish instructors have been allocated money, er, they are training specific saboteurs, extremists and terrorists. this is also recognized by polish experts. e, the head of the polish geopolitical society, the kola pro. it's been said for a long time, that is poland is preparing to destabilize the situation in belarus by expanding the war zone into our territory. here is their task. they created the entire infrastructure for this. unfortunately, and they want this to be the reason for this. we must now talk about the reasons, here is the plan that the head of russian intelligence said. here's what we need to understand. the first annexation of ukraine is already underway. and today ukraine is already dividing it, what it owns, it has

nothing. she, if before the beginning of her life, she had such, you know, at least elementary remnants of sovereignty and property. today, what they have not yet given away, they must give back within 100 years, and children and grandchildren will no longer give up, and western ukraine is already quietly buying up and belongs to non-ukrainians for a long time, as far as we are concerned. the most important thing in this regard is that without us, without belarus, to implement the plans of poland and the west in general in this context of weakening.