the power system was left without electricity 16,000 houses most of all went to the prefectures of sappora and hokkaido due to snow drifts , traffic on high-speed highways is paralyzed, special equipment is fighting an unequal battle with snowdrifts on the streets and sidewalks. the depth of the snow marks reaches half a meter frost in belarus will be replaced by its thaw in the forecasts of weather forecasters for a temperature increase, it is still frost today, to -10 °, and tomorrow in most of the country in the daytime up to plus four on the roads there will be sleet, and precipitation, apparently, sleet and rain. after a period of cold winter weather on tuesday, a sharp change in the weather conditions of western europe is expected on the territory of our country. atmospheric fronts will spread and warm air masses from wednesday will be temporary precipitation, apparently, blood snow and rain in some places fog is expected, the icy road will become icy air temperature at night. now it is -4 + 2 °, it is

a little warmer -2 + 4 °, it will be slippery and foggy until the end of the working week during the day, the air temperature will fluctuate from minus three to plus three degrees in our broadcast. all the best.

good evening, good evening, exactly 22 years before my birthday on may 1, 1947, an appeal was published by a group of soviet scientists, cultural workers, public figures with a proposal to create an all-union society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. yep, social science. let's just say it's not outdated. today, firstly, marat sergeevich i look at you well with mathematics, and it is society that disseminates not only public political knowledge, but also scientifically. well, in the sense of natural science. so that we invite you. why not yet among our lecturers, but in fact, yes there were such conversations, even in soviet times and social science. it was on the one hand, recognizable on the other hand. as they say, youth has become memes. well, remember, we figured this in soviet comedies. but this does not mean that it was something so bad or wrong, on the contrary. it was in great

demand. i found social science lecturers when i was very young , i remember, then they came to us and told us quite interesting things, but i’m not talking about library of social studies. imagine, recently, uh, graduate students asked me, and how lecturers used to prepare, when there was no internet, and this is how the social studies library was, there were these amazing brochures, where information was summarized. yes. there , in different countries on various problems, and with this they really armed the facts with arguments, and the newspaper was not in vain. that was the name of arguments and facts, and who knows, yes, it was the official absolutely official organ of society, knowledge itself, by the way, even circulation came out. yes, we all know, this is true once again, so i invite you to become our lecturer. i don't reach. people are waiting for you. eh, but at the same time, in the nineties, they wanted to abandon the knowledge society, as well as other soviet traditions, but life itself showed

that it is necessary to come to people live, talk, explain, convey their point of view. look how synchronously the processes of the revival of social science are going on both in russia and in russia, you can ask, but how in other countries? uh-huh just called differently that's the tradition of educational clubs, communities, they are very common. that's generally the structures within the individual lands. germany has a structure. similar to social studies are called educational centers there. somehow, here we often represent classic english clubs, you know, these are sitting gentlemen, they smoke cigars and drink tea. eh, i probably don’t know whiskey, and then the nationalist hunts for nothing like that, in fact, and classic english clubs are educational structures. i'm not talking about what is in the european tradition, but enlightenment there broad working masks spoke organization of various courses. this

is it. consciousness with many political parties is a very topical issue for belarus now, the development of political parties, and so, with many political parties there are appropriate educational or research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes, it created not only public leaders, yes, but even screens and heroes. yes , through the same outstanding actor balala yes , a favorite of women, yes, if there is the sixties years, but knowledge in recent years has not had bright public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, they will not even name the head of the knowledge society of the soviet union or the belarusian republican and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? to become a media conductor of knowledge, well, society well, i think that

several factors have converged here at once, but first of all, yes, the first part of your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, maybe the leaders. no need to know which academician for example, he headed social studies, that academician vavilov stood at the base there, konstantin simonov, the famous poet, that is , this initiative came from them ; he understands that it is so important that we want to call speakers, you want to call lecturers classical, and people who come to the audience charge and what is called establish contact. these are the people we have, they we have and we actively invite them as part of the events that we are holding. let's take two of ours, probably, over the past year, the largest and most basic actions

by which we are recognized, which we are proud of, belarus 1 and belarus 1 in the pravda regime. it appeared e. well, somewhere spontaneously. that's just a big conversation with the president, where he raised the issue of the knowledge society. oh, and already in august-september on the eve of our first day of national unity on september 17th. we decided to drive through the regions and we saw that shpakovsky dermant is avdonin. i can go further list. these are the people who are recognized, who are trusted, who listen and who are expected, that is, we can say that they are ordered in a good way. yes, we work by order in a broad sense, according to the social order and specifically of certain organizations, and in fact often they order not some kind of lecture, but this or that person. here we are waiting. let him come to us, and we will continue to continue. borovik. petrovsky a. belyaev that's what pleases me, journalists have appeared, who are waiting for

a little light, a smooth tour indeed. and they they know how to communicate with an uh audience, the audience listens to them completely or does not quite agree to argue, discusses. it is very important. look how many people like this we have . e in the deputy corps. and so you need to work with them for them. if you like, you need to create a platform matrix to offer a model of working methods, because we have also established even this year or two and the form of work, be it a dialogue platform. whether it's a lecture. it is necessary to change it is necessary to change the format of reporting information. let it be a little, but no less, that is, this forum he was such a shot. yes, it needs to be repeated. and what form of e are you looking at. here in february , on the eve of the vote on the constitution, there was a large forum in the regime of truth in the sports palace, and on september 17. eh, there was something similar to e in well dedicated to history, this is our history

in minsk on september 17 - this was carried out under the auspices of the ministry of culture. we partially participated there, but we saw that such formats are in demand among people vladimirovich here. see. we are now talking about speakers. they are more or less even professionally trained, but in the same ussr there was galina ulanova yes, a ballerina a ballerina. yes, it can be called silver now . yes, they would. but i know who you see now as the headliners of the renewed society. you know, it's interesting, they mentioned the ballerino, as if you were reading our plans. even though i know we didn't share sex. yes, we are working very actively with our big theatre. e, with e. ekaterina dulova about interaction and forms of information submission here

musical meteorological methods, and i really like the way we worked. i also see that people are in demand on the stage of the kupala theater, when in august of this year our kupala patriotic forum was held. and we even interact with the national beauty school. we see, i ’ll say it directly, maybe even looking ahead. here is our famous merch of the first, those slogans that are written, with which we go out, because behind each of these slogans there is an idea. behind each of these slogans there is a certain message. the appeal and it can be revealed, relying on it, you can convey this or that information, the idea, it can be embodied in different forms, and we are trying these forms. and in working with the audience. you have an understanding, if we remember the social science of the soviet union, we understand. there were 2,000 academicians, there were more than 200,000 doctors. yes, there were 400,000

engineers, yes, who took part in one way or another in the work of social science. we understand that in order to come to the same audience of cultural workers. yes , it is desirable that a person has certain knowledge in this area and spoke with them in the same language. you have such an understanding, but if he talks about the topic of cultures, because we have cultural workers, i had to speak. eh, cultural workers, if you are talking about geopolitics or economics, you must first of all understand another issue. you correctly point out that when you communicate with people, you must understand who you are talking to. and speak to them in a language they understand and understand , although i will tell you. here now we have organized the day before the seventy-fifth anniversary of such a lecture marathon on the basis of the academy of management, a series of lectures dedicated to the national idea of ​​the geopolitics of the economy, and historical continuity. and this is a very profound lecture. it's because, you

know, we have sometimes. they want to follow the audience, they want to captivate simply, but it is important that there is knowledge and understanding of the arguments and we have organized such a series of lectures, and we see how people perceive them, we will continue this lecture hall . you have already mentioned that the president was an active lecturer in social studies and in the year 78, it was he who became a responsible secret. shklov organization. yes, the society is now becoming the leader of the republican. social science yes, you certainly raised the archives. yes, and interested. by this very fact, of course, i am grateful to our archival workers. we looked at the materials. and by the way, we also looked at newspaper publications, because social science has always been actively reflected in the media, as it is now. here. you, when you said that you had not heard anything for several years, but this communication was not organized. i don't say who's to blame there knowledge or themselves. well, this fact is just

very important to interact. by the way, when the society was created in the forty-seventh year, one of the tasks was to widely publish in the media, including, interestingly, the transcripts of the lecture. this is such a task that we can say that lecturer lukashenka was expected. uh, his information was trusted to the audience what we now know was always crowded, he was preparing for a lecture. this is very important. uh worked, relevant literature. here is what we see, for that time and i am convinced that the formation of the personality of our president is of his certain style. that's the time of work and the executive secretary of the electronic was more time than, uh, occupying a full-time position in the knowledge society. so this had a big impact on him. ok then. in 2007, by his decree, the president transformed the public association of knowledge

into a republican state public association. come on, it's a status, and with your appointment in the twenty-first year. yes, in fact, he breathed into him a new a life. well let's talk straight. i do n’t bow before you, i say what is what i see, i’ll sincerely appreciate clairvoyance. president, he knows what will be needed in the future, and i'm not just talking about your organization. well, you must admit, what is anti-privatization alone worth, yes, state-owned enterprises and pandemics, when we were not driven by moisture. when he really wanted to, but how do you explain these things to yourself? this is some kind of special knowledge. well, firstly, with regard to the president's attention to our society, i feel and the decree was not only of the seventh year, but also last year in november. they just supported us. well, he set specific tasks, and they are promising, but also demanding, which we

must do in the field of historical knowledge of political and scientific popularization of science. of course, we will fulfill the goals and tasks that have been set, but if we talk about the president, lukashenka, of course, this is a very big intuition. it's important, that we don't learn. this is an innate feeling. then a great worldly experience is huge that's why the president always says one must go from life, because there should be no artificiality, there should be no desire. well , you know, you need to indulge in something rational, which is characteristic of our belarusian nature of reasoning, but christmas trees. well, may be an anchor, drumming heels, not only you have an axis alley, uh, you live somewhere and this is a clear understanding that is peculiar to us, it is inherent in the president, of course, this is a huge

store of knowledge certainly ah and trust to specialists, after all look at the time the same covid next to the president have always been specialists. in this area. these are not some arbitrary decisions. they are based on a deep analysis of the information supplied by specialists and only after that a decision is made. the key to the success of any game of erudition is calmness and confidence. please translate into russian the belarusian word we have is the volga region the volga region yes, and the volga region how much you need to be confident in your answer in order to multiply it in triplicate, both adults and children adhere to this rule.

hello andrei valerievich. i answered this the question is not, since the main unit of measurement for the length of the whole is a meter and an intellectually entertaining show that motivates you to stretch your brain too. you pressed answer. if you do not know, you can not answer the wrong answers - this is minus five points. i just remind you to watch on tv channel belarus 24. open people and kiev live in the woods and skin day to rob non-stocks to benefit society to serve society. that's it. it is one. these are values, which are universally human, they are characteristic, both for i think everything here, and for, uh, caucasians,

the hallway of favorite meats and robert everything, how to grab her and pass on the wobbly look of the clip brothers to such elements, we from reason that this is classicism a great town that moved a small place of a person from set my snotty forms and that branch for me became so dear, where i found the use of all my skills. and vetom would like to hear not to continue his work anyhow. uh, well, we don’t look far there, so to speak. here on tuesday, the president held an important meeting to bring individual laws in

line with the updated constitution. here are two of the most important documents. these were the laws of the obs on the entire belarusian people's assembly and law-political parties. here are the main messages you heard for yourself, not debatable, but those that are necessary for deep reflection, understanding and bringing to people. and now, you must agree, your task is precisely this, when we discussed the amendments to the amendments to the constitution, just the same issues related to all the belarusian people's assembly were. uh, among the leaders in uh, discussion. yes, people asked, what is it for what is it already, when we held dialogue platforms in the fall. why did the entire belarusian people's assembly not ask if there was understanding, there is understanding, and the question arose only there, how is his bed, uh, how will it be directly? yes, how will it work? here, as it seems, the main thing is the entire belarusian

people's assembly, it is not lukashenka who needs it, it is not the presidential power that needs it. the country needs it, for which, to ensure a stable development of society to ensure continuity and as a vivid embodiment of the true principle of democracy. unfortunately, the model of democracy that is offered to us, and more often imposed by the west, is a manipulative model, we see how it actually happens. this is the model of the oligarchy, which uses various tricky technologies. he is trying to explain to the people, but to explain to create the illusion that the people are involved in governance, we are really laying the whole belarusian people's assembly, uh, the principle of our true democracy that we associate it with our traditions. this is no coincidence. here i

will not even touch the evening. take the 20th century, our belarusian experience, the all-belarusian congress of the 17th year. it was in a non-parliamentary form, but the people got together and claimed their right to live in their own land and determine how we live. take the people's assembly of western belarus in the thirty -ninth year, thanks to which we united in one state, it had great legitimacy, and any historian who has come across the history of the people's gathering can see this from the documents zakhodni and belorussia will confirm that this was a genuine popular representation in 906 at its height. we remember the islands of constitutional political crisis. the people's assembly is all belarusian. the people's assembly played a huge role in the twentieth year in february. that is, we are already shaping our historical experience, including that of recent history, into a legislative form, that is, not something so illusory, but

something that already exists, something that has already been developed and is laying a certain perspective. yes, we are pioneers here, but this is not necessary. be afraid, because we still rely on our understanding of our political system. and how to ensure the main principle that the people should be the source of power is good, but the main reproach that yes is thrown at the authorities is that labor collectives. they will not be represented practically in the composition of the vns , the president spoke very clearly about this, how you will bring it up. eh, i'll tell you that when we had discussions now. here, uh, bastard. eh, even contrived. uh, that such a problem was not raised, people rather said how to take part, they need to just be able to explain it, because the majority there will be just the same representatives of the labor collective. here is a specific example. hmm, about a third is a

deputy, and moreover, at all levels of the village councils and the president stood up for us to be preserved in the constitution, the village council is the one, the first level, when a person encounters a representative of power or vice versa takes on part of this power, becoming a deputy from village council before e, the national assembly of the house of representatives of the soviet republic representatives of labor groups. where do our deputies come from? we have deputies only in the house of representatives they work with a break from work, all the rest , look, these are doctors, teachers, businessmen. uh, these are people from this or that collective, well, let's take our main uh, civil society actors, who will send their representatives to the trade union. well, a trade union is the flesh of the flesh of labor collectives. this is, in principle, the labor collection of the belarusian republican youth union. where are we young people in the audience and in labor collectives, they will also be nominated; the same

applies to the veterans of white russia of the women's union, these are the representatives of these collectives. and why do we have a question, when is a public association at all. if not they put forward with us the same director of the enterprise has quite a lot of worries about the economy and the provision of jobs for the sale of products. i can list further. we are still the management and, uh, the team has a task than the organization. here is the election. and why are there trade unions in this collective, and why are they from of this collective, they nominated their deputy either by collecting signatures or directly from the collective. this is their voice, their voice will be presented to the entire belarusian national assembly, so there is logic here. it seems obvious to me. it seems to me that one more point should be emphasized, president. e drew attention to it well, delegates. it is not just that all the belarusian people's assembly should participate. they must then come to their labor collectives and report back. that is, they must then work with them. here it may be

something that we lacked before the constitutional referendum, and before this law we had e we were delegates. well, we have worked out all the belarusian people's gathered. let's be honest, let's go. here i took part once and still no. now you are for the entire duration of the entire belarusian people's assembly. what makes it easier, first of all, to be responsible to those who nominated you? it's not just you being present. communicated with like-minded people, worked there 1 2 3 more days listened to the president asked questions discussed the program of socio-economic development. you are responsible for the implementation of this decision and, moreover, the powers that we vest in the entire belarusian people's assembly. they are huge, in fact, such a collective body, uh, in the hands of which the fate of our country will be. including even in the most difficult situations a good political party. yes, the second part of the second normative document that

was discussed. here's a clear one for you. which parties should remain. that's what we discussed a lot on this topic, yes, and we had different points of view. look here. let's comparable with those countries where political parties came from, if in fact they were reborn there, here are the parties that we study in the course, classical political science, which were written about by scientists representatives of political science in the middle of the 20th century. well, they don't. well, take it any, but oh well, there is an american system, it is special. well, take the french parties, but where are those classical socialists, galist communists, new movements are now being created. uh, very fast dynamics of political life, everything changes, and we are often offered. not here, let's go back. here we will create something to that scheme of the fifties. we must, firstly, look at the trends, and secondly, proceed from our own interests , the party should not divide society. it

should represent the interests of a significant part of society, not necessarily all, but not to divide the party should not demand the overthrow of the constitutional order. it can and should criticize the government if it is not itself the government, but the party cannot be financed without leading to a civil split and the party cannot be abroad to be an instrument of an individual oligarch or oligarchic groups, it cannot be bought by some big businessman, these are the key requirements, but the party must also have some kind of ideology, the party cannot be created just to participate in this or that electoral campaign. this is a very serious demand that the party must represent the whole of society. er, well, not necessarily. that's right, all citizens. but if this is a party, it should be in minsk, and it should be in vitebsk in all regions, except for the regional level. we also have

districts, but if not in all then, well, at least in the third there should be structures. when he comes out, he says, i am a representative of one party or another. we must understand. yes, there are at least 10 behind him, they have 20-30.000 party members . this is the program we understand with whom we are dealing, and if the party was created in order to cut grants or satisfy someone's ambitions, why does the belarusian society need such a party and most importantly, god forbid, if this arises, it's in perspective way of manipulating our political systems are usually from abroad. here are the clear barriers. you think that we have already got rid of random parties. here's a new look, not yet, not yet, not yet. uh, let's wait for the adoption of the law, then, as i understand it, the procedure for re-registration of the party should go through, probably some parties will leave. even obviously there will be new parties. uh, i don't

know. can we talk about, uh, concrete examples here? well, i would still say, look how they showed themselves. the communist party works according to the norms, a many have tried to impose such an image. eh, this party is from the past. yes, this is it. where does it come from, only the old people, well, if the old people, well, look how many young sheets of bright recognizable liberal-democratic parties have appeared. how it works, yes, yes, there are ambitions about white russia. well, let's see how the situation will develop. i see that there is. eh, some ideological ones. well, no matter how associations, but niches based on our constitutional system, which is not yet represented at the party level, it means that they may have appeared. i like your idea which was said. that's when we started discussing this block. eh, after all, it’s really not the vns, nor the party, the president does n’t really need them, they are personal. yes, he does not need them as

portraits. indeed, in fact, the president has always communicated directly with the people, and this was his main distinguishing feature. here, in essence. we are talking about the fact that they should become the same parties, uniting them with such a uniting principle for protection against external threats, as if observing the main principle, everything is in the interests of their state. here, if we we will clearly understand this and convey this moment, probably, well, it seems to me, then the understanding will be correct. let's just say alexander lukashenko, he is the creator. here is that independent sovereign belarus as we know it. i think it's hard for anyone to argue with that. and now he understands. time is changing, and belarus is changing, and he wants to define it. uh, this is the political model, including the social model of our development, which will remain for many years to come, and we are interested in this. here is the interest president coincides with the public interest. uh-huh i got such an idea pushed.

here, look, we have been talking for several years in a row, including as part of the work of lecturers, or speakers, but we already had a lecturer. i remember in truth mode well? give it to people well, they reacted, thanks to the people sitting here, including, uh, this was such a collective work in fact. look, we have been talking about the manual for several years. sharpe yes, and 50 years will already be as follows does not work. listen, well yes, it's actually 2020. yes, he made a professional out of us, those who are already beginning to really understand what happened, how it happened and that we are not really unique in all this, but we turned out to be the only ones who turned out to be too tough for the smell, because i am very as he says a little warms the soul, maybe, in the society of knowledge, we already have our own manual, our own manual, and not anti-sharpa? yes, but on lukashenka's manual

there is such a request, and m-m it is obvious to do this, i will just share with you an observation you have in your twentieth year. well, in general we e we spoke today in the belarusian character. there is such a character, we do not like to brag or show our own there, on the contrary, we hide something somewhere. well, you know that there, uh, and the neighbors did not envy, and so, well, just in case, so as not to jinx it. well , sometimes belarusians are not often treated like that, uh, and i noticed that a lot of colleagues in russia and even in foreign countries want to study this experience, but they do it so carefully. inviting to some events or coming here and not right away, but gradually speaks. and how did it happen for you, what did you do, and why did they do it this way, and indeed, not only opponents, but also allies or potential allies are looking at us very seriously. this belarusian experience is very valuable.

i think that we are already in lectures somewhere, talking at international conferences. e, including with statesmen of foreign countries outlined this experience. eh, well, it's probably time to generalize it and propose it in the form of some kind of possible one. i just won't do research. not just wake up stupid. i have to emphasize one point all the time writing until now this information is hanging free encyclopedia. yes, like wikipedia that, in order to cope with that information war, the information struggle in the twentieth, flew here. yes, a few. hello , who provided this information victory, and in fact, when we understand that we did it ourselves. uh, this is well worth the availability of information. yes, i want to ask, you were the deans of the faculty, you know, how to communicate with youth. here are our enemies. they

didn't calm down. they very much count on the younger generation, which will have the right to vote in the electoral campaign. yes, and the right to choose. they need such new blood to replace the one that either figured out the situation or sat down, as they say, yes. so, are you going to use a fashionable internet platform and talks in the same tiktok about the same genocide, continuing the previous question, in order to be successful, you don’t have to try to be fashionable, but because it will only external form no result and no need to work according to the training manual. and there must be inspiration and there must be. here, uh , you know this understanding, as the military, they say you want to win, knowing the charter, but you didn’t let go of the war. here you must understand the algorithm of actions, what you must do, but if you speak only according to the charter, nothing will work. if you don’t know, the joint wo

n’t work either, so we need to understand. this basis should be knowledge and a sense of the situation. well, we see how our president works. and as for the youth for 2 of the year. let me tell you, quite a lot has been honestly done, and we even see how the enemy reacts to this, uh, i will not only speak knowledge in my society. uh, we work very closely with the ministry of education. look, the anthem is being performed in schools. very serious systematic work is being done on historical education on patriotic education. new discipline. the block is being introduced brightly enough, our union with the youth is working. we are already seeing the results i have talked to our military. and they emphasize that even uh, the call has become change. these are the guys who are joining the army now. well, the armed forces in general. and this is good. i would even

say e well, not all problems. of course, we decided here in youth humility. this is by no means , but one cannot fail to see trends that are positive for a more problematic age from 30 to 405. these are, say, former or young people who recently left because of that age, and who somewhere we missed in those years when, perhaps, we underestimated the importance of ideology a little were embarrassed to talk about patriotism, at least as we do it now, questions of historical education of culture. let's put it straight, and then our mediaological opponents. there was simply dominance there, well, you must admit the ninety- first to 2003, almost a word of ideology. let's say. here we are now, we know our relationship to bullish symbolism, right? the twentieth year, the beginning of the nineteenth, i don’t even say in the city center a store next to the academy of the ministry of internal affairs on

masherov avenue, where everything is freely sold and not you only take off at the airport. that's where it all is. it is sold virtually freely. here's what happened recently. and so, the generation that was formed in that period was young and young. it is even necessary to work with them, maybe more in-depth than although with all categories, of course. uh, you have to work, but we see from sociology, it's at least another one, okay then. if not new, then working form. yes, not informing the attitude towards them is different. well one of the biggest critics in front of you is how we do it. well, here you will agree largely depends on the specific speakers correctly, who are traveling correctly to a specific team. maybe i'll give you a little first. firewood into this fire, and then you will kindle it. yes, i am gasoline, i will tell you my impression, when i come to the team to perform, it is very important for me that

the team is not selected in such a way that it is absolutely smooth. i want to have tough questions. and sometimes it still seems to me that they are simply afraid to introduce these people into this team, and there is such a thing, of course good. why? you are the most critical of me and i consider myself to be such, because i had to go through all the stages. eh, this form of work. e has been introduced in our country since 2003 , when the system policy actually began. here in march 2003, the beginning of the state ideological policy was a big seminar, the president signed decrees for this and off i was a teacher who was engaged in this work. i was one of the leaders of the youth union, who also came at the information day. you correctly said that he was also the dean of the union of journalists. we this was done worked in the media , that is, i can see how it is organized, often there is a lot of formalism.

that's what we write for. we talked about training manuals, because every day of informing they write an appropriate brochure, relying on which, creatively, processing this information, it is necessary to convey the point of view that we sometimes get it. they just take and read out the hearing of the team, what we want to achieve. so it’s better, in general, not to hold such an informing day than to hold a question our speakers, recognizable hyped in copper, of course, will not reach exactly on the day of information for each team. although, believe me, there are a lot of bright people in the region. this year we held belarus 1. what wonderful historians do we have in the regions? well, i’m amazing, in fact, that is, these people are local, maybe they are not so, recognizable at the national level, by the way, that’s tv, we need to raise them and invite them here to minsk from mogilev vitebsk to grodny by means yes sure to eat these people we have them we see now, by the way, during our actions. we saw them, yes, it is your companies, in my

opinion. can give us the text of the speakers who lacked today ready to do it and will do it. these are not empty words. so continuing the day of informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy director for ideological work and how we appoint them to a person who simply reads this manual aloud. he probably shouldn't be in this position. it is rightly said that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well the word is such a commodity, but it must be a unique person, i understand, you won’t find such people everywhere , so we need to think here how to convey, maybe, uh, and it’s bad, uh, with these events. let's do it in one day . there are three and a half thousand meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk to introduce seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy

of management. where do we call bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online in the form, when we have a person who understands this problem through online can cover? rock e our bands we offer it. you understand here. eh, even one beautiful tete-presentation, as you had in the truth mode. here you come with this one, you don’t need to collect everyone. well, one speaker will come to the district on the topic of information day and believe me, the whole district will know, there is no need to collect 150 people from all the enterprises there, the whole district will know, but it is also important to live here the second part, so that officials representatives of state authorities actually traveled. these are two lines. this speaker is an expert who understands a particular problem and representatives of the gost authorities, for whom the day of informing is a way to communicate, learn about the problems of the team, and answer people's requests. it does not always work out, yet, but we should think about

improving this work. and in principle, if you like, our state ideological policy. that's in the broadest sense of the word. this is the informative and legal basis of the form method of work organizational staffing . we need to restart, firstly, from those normative acts that were adopted back in the third and fourth year. wow, how much time has passed the twentieth year has taught us a lot now on life teaches, and therefore, it seems to me, the time has come. uh, not only such a serious big conversation, but the solution, uh, in this part, we had a seminar in june under the leadership of the president on work. here is this explanatory very sound thought. the president also spoke there at this seminar. e, noted the direction of the work and made a remark and criticized, but already half a year has passed. it seems to me, especially a year before the electoral campaign of our single day. which will be in 24, just the time has come

for such a systematization of all this work and our achievements and shortcomings. a and. that's what we said restart, if you like, maybe a provocative question. now yes, and i'm not waiting for the other two. queues, social studies, significantly 2/3 of all lectures were paid. yes, this is the system in your knowledge society. yes, and they now have paid lectures. i understand such a question always as well, here, let's just have an ideology . well, let's say it straight somewhere, maybe , and uh, the load, of course, as in general, i'll say it straight. we have all the speeches within the framework, and the campaigns to clarify the constitution were all free, it was all that. well, here is a civil call, a patriotic call, all people work like that, but at the same time. let's take our expert. well, let's say it's up to the price. at the university well, firstly, he needs to break away from his main activity,

often, this is a trip somewhere outside the same minsk if he himself is from minsk yes, and on the territory in minsk he needs to prepare very seriously for this, this is both emotional and intellectual costs, they must be compensated. well, why not, especially if, uh, our enterprises have allocated funds for this? after all, if the company orders, as we said, one color or another. well, his expenses for this work should be compensated from my point of view. this is right. here's how to organize this work, and again at a new level, we are now discussing such agreements, and many of our trade union organizations and enterprises conclude them directly. eh, but we see that it still needs to be generalized in some way, again put on a new basis. speakers here, perhaps in this situation, many themselves want to. listen, this

was such a case. we are on the talk show of vladimir rudolfovich. solovyov once mentioned this possibility, when everyone says, we will come. i think our audience is waiting here, by the way, and the surprises we have certain phone broke off they say when not joyful and hurtful. that's all the same. here i say, belarus here we are, sometimes we value someone else's. uh, well, the russians aren't really for us. uh, strangers, but over there in moscow or somewhere else. well, let's say. this is the same as with a musical performer will be here to sing to perform. you know very well that as soon as fr. o. you see, you will play in our theater, well, the circle of theater-goers will know, as soon as somewhere not even in the series in moscow at the theater. as they say there will appear says, well you see, they took it, this is how we feel it on our own, as soon as you become more likely to speak on moscow talk shows, as it were . of course, let's talk about it directly.