that there will be a discussion and, in the end, all this will strengthen our state. that is, i am convinced that i will win, but in fact, we see, if we look at the oldest, probably such a party system, the political great britain, then we will see that there are conservatives and laborites. and they fight hard with each other. we see this, they have a culture of behavior in parliament in general. completely wild for us, but it has developed historically, that is, on culture. not chaos, they are going on there, and despite the fact that they seem to be radically different, at the same time and those and other patriots, both of them know the limits, beyond which they will be considered traitors to the motherland and the relevant legislation will work against them. that is, such a mechanism is proposed now. well, yes, of course, i absolutely agree with you that this exists in all countries. uh, we really need a dialogue between the parties, probably, at some critical moments we need strategic sport, but uh, this is what we are doing, it seems to me, this is, uh,

such a belarusian experience to teach parties to talk to each other because we have not too much experience in party building. and the e parties are not very popular among the population and it will be quite difficult to explain which party to choose, because they will have to learn how to talk not only among themselves, but also from the population to make ordinary advertising attract to themselves. e voters party members. this is such a very complex mechanism. a and e vns. uh, i think yes, this will be the platform that will allow. e, here to unite all these multidirectional currents, but e parties e should not bet only on the nss they, uh, should. to create their own political culture, their own political field in which they will work in the national assembly - these are not proportions. it's a little. this is a little different , we should have two two platforms. these are political parties. it's uh, vns. eh, and eh, vns.

still, this is not an answer. and on some external pressure, this is what we were going for. we had it for a long time from the very beginning and we are just completing this process today, and not starting it. let's continue. he has a few more important topics to discuss. i think so or otherwise, because we have touched upon, we will return to talk about sovereignty. this is indeed one of the main features of the state. we see that today hail has been knocked down all the time, just these days there is a powerful build-up of tension around serbia kosmos on the night of december 12, president vucec called the most difficult night of his life, the aggravation began after the prime minister of the collection, announced by the republic of kosovo, said that the nato contingent will remove the roads in the north . the barricades built by the coasts. serbs it means that he actually put forward an ultimatum if the serbs are not dispersed by nato all, then the local police will go into action. vučić held an emergency meeting of the security council and accused the united states and, above all, of non-compliance with the agreements reached earlier on outer space. germany considers

serbia's plans to ask nato to deploy its armed forces in kosovo unacceptable. this is a statement by the head of the german foreign ministry, berberg, it is noteworthy that a new round of tension happened literally a week after the historical one, as its participants themselves called the eu the western balkans in a tyrant. and so borisovich himself what kind of partners turned out to be a week ago. they patted the student on the shoulder and talked. here are the bolts. we are one family here, and today is like this. well, everything, the fact is that the balkans are full of contradictions even between fraternal countries that have one language, one religion, and they are even ethnically the same in e, take the serbs, take the croats, take the montenegrins. you see, it means that montenegro is the latest to break away from serbia. and before that, there were slovenia and croatia, the contradictions are great, and these contradictions

the countries of the west are playing, which do not want a stable coalition of slavic countries to form, er, which are the allied russia of the pre-war confrontation. here you go now. well i think that learn understands that from a military point of view. serbia cannot oppose anything to the nato bloc, and given that the largest military base of the united states is located on the territory of kosovo, and, therefore, eastern europe, i think that, of course, the matter of pre-war actions will not come to fruition. unless some kind of natural disaster happens fire. understandably interesting americans. everything is clear here. already about it they said one base is worth what? and besides, here's a factor of destabilization in the european union, well, why do europeans? it would seem unnecessary, but we eat, burbock. we see a barrel, which is clearly on the side. here in this conflict, on the side of the brishnah, they also undermine little ukraine and little tension. turkey

greece with small grants, they need to blow up the balkans more, which means they will sink faster than food. i just want to say that we are somewhat, probably misleading misplaced stocks, please, all this policy is determined by the united states of america. everything is just all these policies are managed, it's obvious that i think at all. these waterings are compromising evidence of the united states, see the statement of mother merkel who, in general, according to such a mother to whom the stepmother after such statements, you know, undermined her political career, there are experts who believe that there is compromising evidence about merkel’s connections with the stasi, which allows the united states of america to manipulate her. and this is her and her statement that the minsk agreements were just a gain of time to strengthen the army of ukraine is a demonstration for russia that in europe it is impossible to negotiate with anyone

, it was only worth the macron to declare with the united states, that he is ready there for the negotiation, we will ensure the interests of russia cost shvetts. there is someone else, as a statement immediately followed, which was supposed to show putin that there are no people in europe with whom we must understand the server is in a very difficult situation, that is, and they have extremely limited maneuver for action. remember they imposed sanctions against belarus. they didn’t want to, in relation to russia, they didn’t introduce it yet in relation to belarus, they were forced to. we understand very well, although by and large they should remember how lukashenka flew there in 1999 . i remember under the bombardments. i remember remember, and so we are somewhere, despite the fact that this decision was unpleasant. well, we understand, but the second point is that you are asking whether there will be a military confrontation or will not fight. why does such statements fight to defend the interests of europe all his statements over the past year, they are destroying the european union, including if the americans

need a military conflict, it will be and they will keep this conflict smoldering on purpose, for which they are the worst - this is a strong powerful europe of waste-free, which can really become a competitor for the usa. it is not necessary. ukraine will start to lose even more. they understand that ukraine will lose ukraine will never in this conflict will win. what else do they have? they also have transnistria moldova, where you can play around, you can play around in central asia, they will try around russia, but in europe itself , why should kosovo and serbia have peace, why do they need it? and they gave birth to this conflict all their lives. uh, how it all began, who destroyed yugoslavia, who split, and who controls kosovo, who forced him to recognize and create an international precedent, who are all the business corporations, they finance who owns cellular communications in coconut, everything belongs to the americans americans, therefore, if they need it , they will do it. but if europe was truly independent, if germany

really wanted to be the leader of the european union today, the world would have to expel the americans to sit down at the negotiating table and agree on something completely different. the history of europe was. i would not agree here that the european union is acting purely as a spider of the americans here . why? because she remembers that it was not america that began to destroy yugoslavia, but in general the first geopolitical operation of the frg gensha, croatia slovenia and the european union are facing a challenge. uh, include serbia in the u25 . and the condition for this inclusion is the recognition of kosovo as independent. as you can admit, now there is a strong pressure on the time when russia is diverted to a special military operation. the second moment, a gas pipeline from turkey passes through serbia, which supplies gas to hungary and

europe . poland, the flow of the gas pipeline, which must also be stopped and a small armed conflict with rupture of this gas pipeline. that's all, maybe . e, i think that here we are now reaping our strategic union state and russia in the zero years, when we were obviously mistaken by the west, because serbia then asked for the union state and its dkb. she was also an observer to the eurasian union. it could have been included, but we did not offer it at the moment when it was possible to do so, roadmaps for integration today, unfortunately, we have one. we read messages from mikusova will officially submit an application for membership in the european union are trying to use the application and already e the status of a candidate for eu membership received bosnia herzegovina with the problems that were and on which the word claims turkish influence in the region. and

olgievna. we touched upon the topic, indeed merkel yes, we saw this revelation when she said that, in fact, the minsk agreements were a screen, everyone already understood that this is absolutely fake. we saw their faces, which then in the palace of independence we saw real achievements, which were in the end. do you think she ever she admits that it will forever remain on her conscience that they did not finish these minsk agreements in order to prevent what we are now seeing, for example, in ukraine. merkel’s position caused a mixed reaction not only among us, but also in the west. here, i would pay more attention to this and, uh, in austria a very noisy statement has already followed yes, these austrian chancellor hein with christian fine speaking. moreover, at the round table, which is dedicated to ukraine, he said that he was frightened by some kind of frankness frau. merkel talks about it. thus. we destroy any basis

for trust. and yes, that's why, as it were, the reaction from europe is more important. uh, does mrs. merkel ever admit what she meant by these words ? well, i think that, of course, it will happen. although it will be such a difficult moment. we must understand that she is saying this in the conditions of an island of crisis that is taking place in relations with russia and she is largely connected, and the common european position, in addition, she is under very serious pressure. in connection with the fact that it was she, a, who pushed through, as they call it now, uh, gas. uh, these contracts, and so she is forced, of course, to talk about her specific political line. and so with such luggage, surely she has for the number of years that she spent in power in germany, the largest state of the european union, if there are many positive moments and the support of the population.

even this does not allow her to be immune from the pressure obtained. yes, sure. i think that today all european politicians are under such a strict pressure. i would not speak about the pressure of aggression and about what all of them, even the former ones, should express, but a certain position in relation to, uh, russia, and to the conflict that is taking place. well, i think there is still a moment and responsibility, which will come later. i think that each of them, uh, very seriously thinks about the fact that the conflict will someday end, how it will end, while it is not clear to everyone a and everyone thinks about their responsibility, that is, lays some bricks of how this will be explained further. here i would added that merkel has dramatically changed her position, because it is over. for only 22 years, this one has been criticized for being very gentle and beautifully advocating dialogue. and then abruptly. she retired

, afraid that she would be taken away, would have been silent, would have been a heroine in the west. uh, there is such a culture of censure, the so-called line, and it is very effective today. this is the most powerful psychological pressure, which is a question. what can have yes, a few more important confession of the reasons for merkel's behavior like this this is the strongest information fund. on they are now really under a lot of pressure, but briefly merkel did not just deceive. all the ideas all over her being a cancer contradict what she said, her and the gas deals. pushed ideologues and was much. sincerely, when they forgot about merkel, let her justify herself to her citizens before history later, but what about the coup d'etat in germany ? this is generally some kind of just sorry for the expression. he is a circus. eh, they ordered a scholz . here's to someone that he has his ratings it took that there will be more and more such coups d'état in europe now. yes, it means that against the backdrop of growing protests, the dissatisfaction

of the german population of the european union, the economic situation, the political situation. it is necessary in some way to return people to the fold, loyalty, or at least fear, therefore, a set of measures is underway, the first intimidation of a nuclear war, it is not russia to raise this topic in belarus with a nuclear threat. tomorrow the war will strike tomorrow so that the europeans will sit hungry and cold, lord, it’s okay, what is here, the second they want to destroy our country with a coup. tomorrow the nazis will come to power. nala, who is there to correspond on the net. what kind of coup is funny to watch, it's like a serious politics, but in the information media, because the world is ruled by information, uh, the media is power. now in europe there is one lie every day and a person wakes up and frightens him. yesterday, the coup was prevented and the fascists were detained. they shot you in a nuclear war. maybe tomorrow the next one will start, which is what scares me. putin has something else in mind. there will be more tomorrow

sit and lose weight and sergeyevich turns out, which means, but they put pressure on the opposition in the form of an alternative for germany. they strengthened the police presence in the cities ; empire profitable call it what you want. here in this garnier, which, as it were, we were given two moments, i saw this power outage, which, as it were, the main one of the main reasons was called and the terrorist story warmed up. yes it something that is connected with reality, and not heinrich there some thirteenth seventy years old. yes , today the problem of the energy crisis is