the same or there chicken that was butchered or the chicken was alone then it suddenly became there, uh with fluorine content or something else, that is, this is not a new product in our understanding of the understanding of this decision. uh, so he 's actually fixing price increases. in today's e, we've made certain changes, and in fact, today's price level, it's frozen for the producer. well, one more group - this is under 40 innovations here , the so-called price justification has appeared now, uh, relatively speaking, if you carry pure importers to build goods, otherwise you you need to have a rationale. why exactly did you choose this supplier, they are some other. well, here's an arbitrary absolutely shape. there is some kind of electronic media conditionally on paper, this is done so that, uh, so that you can prove, for example, to the regulatory authority that you have

chosen the right one? uh, the supplier depending on some form of calculation depending on the conditions and so on. well, here, uh, the boxer also has restrictions on the allowances of the allowances, the so -called contract price, and the associated costs are also fixed. what is necessary to know about the sacrament of communion regular participation in the sacrament of communion brings our spiritual life into a certain tone? why do icons work wonders there yon became a worse chassis driven by yak e in yalom anti-bolleska, which brings the courts deliverance deliverance or a hermit? oh yes, helping. what is the basis of a person’s spiritual life with the end

of a person’s earthly life, the opportunity to change something in oneself ends, if on earth a person was able to cleanse his soul and adorn it with virtue, then in this state his soul enters eternity. what is the power of faith, it is manifested in the temple when we are present at the service. this is manifested in our families when we try to raise our children there, after all, uh, the basis of which is the observance of the commandment of god. answers to these and other questions in spiritual educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel. these people do everything to make our life comfortable. these young lilac seedlings, which will grow and will soon go to the territory of cities and towns of our republic, give us a plus in

this respect. what to get ornamental plants. and no, they work every day, tirelessly already driving up to the place of work. i always blow. what issues will be resolved, some link will be missed, the educational process, it will function, how i would like to create a creative environment , an idea will appear, it will be developed, we offer to spend one day with specialists and learn everything about their difficult task, for me personally, it is always accompanied by such a feeling of an elevated person. culture art spirituality want so work, which is also considered one of the best striving for the best to do. everything is good, so that life is not lived in vain , watch on belarus 24 tv channel.

the most relevant event from the world of sports for the number one game in the small country of the persian gulf was built from scratch by hard training and an exciting competition. that is, it will be an uncompromising struggle, an interesting game or my career for my story. it will be a great event if we can achieve this result. the turning point, probably, begins somewhere around the thirty-fifth kilometer, when the body is already one-sided, you already switch to such moral and volitional qualities. chic base 16.4. yes, his manner of execution and stability they allow us to count on the

highest place, basically. watch in sports projects on belarus 24 tv channel.

good evening, good exactly 22 years before my birthday, may 1, 1947, an appeal was published by a group of soviet scientists, cultural workers, public figures with a proposal to create an all-union society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. yep, social science. let's just say it's not outdated. today, firstly, marat sergeevich i look at you well with mathematics, and it is society that disseminates not only public political knowledge, but also scientifically. well, in a sense, of course, scientifically. so we invite you. why not among our lecturers, but in fact, yes, there were such conversations even in soviet times and social science. it was on the one hand, recognizable on the other hand. as the youth says, it has become a meme. well, remember in the soviet comedies it appeared. but this does not mean that it was something so bad or

wrong, on the contrary. it was in great demand. as an advantage, i found social science lecturers when i was very young , i remember, then they came to us and told us quite interesting things, but i'm not talking about the social science library. imagine here recently, uh, graduate students asked me, and how lecturers used to prepare, when there was no internet, and this is how the library of social science was, there were these amazing brochures, where information was summarized. yes. there , in different countries on various problems, and with this they really armed the facts with arguments, and the newspaper was not in vain. that was the name of arguments and facts, and who knows, yes, it was an official absolutely official body of social science, by the way, the circulation even came out in these three million. yes, that's all you know, it's true again, so i invite you to become our lecturer. i don't reach. people are waiting for you. eh, but at the same time, in the nineties, they wanted to abandon the knowledge society, as well as other soviet traditions, but

life itself showed that it is necessary to come to people live, talk, explain, convey their point of view. look how synchronously the processes of the revival of social science are going on in our country and in russia, you can ask, but what about in other countries? uh-huh just called differently here are the traditions of educational clubs, communities, they are very common. that's generally the structures within the individual lands. germany has a structure. similar to social studies are called educational centers there. somehow, here we often represent classic english clubs, you know, these gentlemen sit and smoke cigars and drink. e tea, er, whiskey, i probably don’t know and then hunts for a leaf of nothing like that in fact, and classic english clubs are educational structures. i'm not talking about the fact that in the european tradition, and the enlightenment there they spoke in wide masks organization of various courses. that's what it is.

knowledge, with many political parties , the development of political parties is a very topical topic for belarus now, and so, with many political parties there are appropriate educational or research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes, it created not only public leaders, yes, but even screen heroes. yes, through the same outstanding actor balal yes, a favorite of women, yes, that is, there are the sixties, but knowledge in recent years did not have prominent public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, anyone, they will not even name the head of the society of knowledge not of the soviet union or the belarusian republican and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? become a media conductor of knowledge well, in society well, i think

that several factors have converged here at once, but first of all, yes, the first part of your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, maybe the leaders. no need to know which academician, for example, headed social science, that academician vavilov stood at the base there, konstantin simonov, a famous poet, that is, this initiative came from them, it is important that they know the lecturer, the president himself was both a social science lecturer and an executive secretary then at school, that is, he organized this work. he understands that it is so important that we want to call the speakers you want to call the lecturers classical, and the people who come to the audience charge. and what is called establishing contact. these are the people we have appeared, we have them and we actively we invite you as part of the events that we hold. let's take two of ours,

probably, for the last year, the largest most basic actions by which we are recognized and by which we are proud, belarus 1 and belarus 1 in the pravda regime. it appeared e. well, somewhere spontaneously. that's just a big conversation with the president, where he raised the issue of the knowledge society. oh, and already in august-september on the eve of our first day of national unity on september 17th. we decided to drive through the regions and we saw that shpakovsky dermant is avdonin. i can go further list. these are the people who are recognized, trusted, listened to and expected. that is, we can say that it is right to order them in a good way. yes, we work by order in a broad sense, according to the social order and specifically of certain organizations, and in fact often they order not some kind of lecture, but this or that person. here we are waiting. let him come to us, and we will continue to continue. borovik. petrovsky a. bilyaev we order it,

journalists appeared, who are waiting for a little light, a smooth tour indeed. and they know how to communicate with uh audience, the audience listens to them completely or not quite agrees to argue, discusses. it is very important. look how many people like this we have. e in the deputy corps. and so you need to work with them for them. if you like, you need to create a platform matrix to offer a model of working methods, because we have also established even this year or two and the form of work, be it a dialogue platform. whether it's a lecture. it is necessary to change it is necessary to change the format of reporting information. let a little, but nevertheless, that is, here this forum he was such a shot. yes, it must be repeated, and in the form e you are looking at. here we have in february, and on the eve of the vote on the constitution, there was a large forum in the regime of truth in the sports palace, and on september 17th. eh, there was something similar to e in well

dedicated to history, this is our history in minsk on september 17 - this was carried out under the auspices of the ministry of culture. we partially participated there, but we saw that such formats are in demand among people vladimirovich here. see. we are now talking about speakers. they exist and more or less professionally trained, but in the same ussr there was galina ulanova yes, a ballerina a ballerina. yes, it can be called celebrity now. yes, they would. but i know who you see now as the headliners of the renewed society. you know, it's interesting, they mentioned the ballerina, as if you were reading our plans. even though i know i haven't been shared sex. yes, we are working very actively with our big theatre. e, with e. ekaterina dulova about the

interaction and forms of presenting information using musical theatrical methods, and for me really like the way we worked. i also see that people are in demand on the stage of the kupala theater, when in august of this year our kupala patriotic forum was held. and we even interact with the national beauty school. we see, i ’ll say it directly, maybe even looking ahead. here is our famous merch of the first, those slogans that are written, with which we go out, because behind each of these slogans there is an idea. behind each of these slogans there is a certain message, this appeal and it can be revealed based on it is possible to convey this or that information to an idea, it can be embodied in different forms, and we try these forms. and in working with the audience. you have an understanding, if we remember the social science of the soviet union, we understand. there were 2,000 academicians, there were

more than 200,000 doctors. yes, there were 400,000 engineers, yes, who took part in one way or another in the work of social science. we understand that in order to come to the same audience of cultural workers. yes , it is desirable that a person has certain knowledge in this area and speaks the same language with them. language. you have such an understanding, but if he talks about the topic of cultures, because we have cultural workers, i had to speak. eh, workers in the sphere of culture, if you are talking about geopolitics or economics, you should first of all analyze another issue in this. you correctly point out that when you communicate with people, you must understand who you are talking to. and speak to them in a language they understand and understand, although i will tell you. right now, on the eve of the seventy-fifth anniversary, we have organized such a marathon of lectures on on the basis of the academy of management, a series of lectures on the national idea of ​​geopolitics , economics, and historical continuity. and this is a very profound lecture. it's because, you

know, we have sometimes. they want to follow the audience, they just want to captivate, but it is important that there is knowledge and understanding of arguments and we have organized such a series of lectures, and we see how people perceive and we will continue this lecture hall. you have already mentioned that the president was an active lecturer in social studies and in the seventy-eighth year, it was he who became the executive secretary shklov organization, yes, now becoming the head of the republican society. social science yes, you certainly raised the archives. yes, and interested. by this very fact, of course, i am grateful to our archival workers. we looked at the materials. and by the way, we also looked at newspaper publications, because social science has always been actively reflected in the media, as it is now. here. you, when you said that you had not heard anything for several years, but this communication was not organized. i don't say who's to blame there knowledge or themselves. well, this fact is just

very important to interact. by the way, when the society was created in the forty-seventh year, one of the tasks was to widely publish in the media, including, interestingly, the transcripts of the lecture. this is such a task that we can say that lecturer lukashenka was expected. uh, his information was confided to the audience for what we now know was always filled with uh, he was preparing for a lecture. this is very important. uh worked, relevant literature. here is what we see, and by that time i am convinced that the formation of the personality of our president is of his certain style. that time of work and the responsible secretary, the electric motor wife had more time than, uh, holding a full-time position in the knowledge society. so this had a big impact on him. ok then. in 2007, by his decree, the president

transformed the public association of knowledge into a republican state public association. oh well, this is status, and with your appointment in the twenty-first year. yes, in fact, he breathed new life into it. well let's talk straight. i do n’t bow before you, i say what is what i see, i’ll sincerely appreciate clairvoyance. president, he knows what will be needed in the future, and i'm not just talking about your organization. well, you must admit, what is anti-privatization alone worth, and state-owned enterprises and pandemics, when moisture did not drive us. when he really wanted to, and here's how you explain these things to yourself. this is some kind of special knowledge. well, first of all, with regard to attention president to our society i feel and the decree was not only the seventh year, but also last year in november, he not only supported us, but also set specific tasks and they are promising, but also demanding, which we

must do in the field of historical knowledge of political and scientific popularization of science. of course, we will fulfill the goals and tasks that have been set, but speaking of president lukashenko, of course, this is a very big intuition. it's important, that we don't learn. this is an innate feeling. then great everyday experience is huge that's why the president always says you need to go from life, because there should be no artificiality there should be desire. well , you know, you need to indulge in something rational, which is characteristic of our belarusian nature of reasoning, but christmas trees. well, to be the anchor of the barabi, beating, not only to you, alleya. uh, where do you live? and this is a clear understanding that is peculiar to us, it is

inherent in the president, of course, this is a huge store of knowledge. certainly ah and trust in specialists, because look at the time of the same covid-19, there have always been specialists next to the president. in this area. these are not some arbitrary decisions. they are based on an in- depth analysis of the information provided by specialists, and only after that one or another decision is made. on tuesday, the president held an important meeting to bring individual laws in line with the updated constitution. these are two important documents. all the belarusian people's assembly and law-political parties considered these laws of the all-union armed forces. here are the main messages you have already heard for yourself not debatable, but those that are necessary for deep reflection, understanding and communication to people. and now you must agree that your

task is precisely this when we discussed the changes in the add. the constitution , just the same issues relating to the entire belarusian people's assembly were among the leading ones in discussion. yes, people asked, what is it for what is it already, when we held dialogue platforms in the fall. why is it necessary that the entire belarusian people's assembly did not ask if there was understanding, there is understanding, but the question arose only there, how to form it. eh, how will it be directly? yes, how will it work? here, as it seems, the main thing is not lukashenko who needs the belarusian people's assembly. it is not necessary for the presidential power, it is necessary for the country, for which, to ensure the stable development of society, to ensure continuity and as a vivid embodiment of the

true principle of democracy. unfortunately, the model of democracy that is offered to us, and more often imposed by the west, is a manipulative model, we see how it actually happens. this is the model of the oligarchy, which is a variety of cunning technologies. he is trying to explain to the people, but to create the illusion that the people are involved in governance, we are really laying the whole belarusian people's assembly, uh, the principle of our true democracy that we associate it with our traditions. this is no coincidence. here i will not even touch the evening. take the 20th century, our belarusian experience, all the belarusian congress of the seventeenth year. it was in a non-parliamentary form, but the people got together and claimed their right to live in their own land and determine how we live. take the people’s assembly of western belarus in the thirty -ninth year, thanks to which we

united in one state, it had great legitimacy, and we can see this from the documents of any historian who has come across the history of the people’s gathering behind the gangway and belarus will confirm that it was a genuine people’s representation ninety-sixth year in full swing. we remember the islands of constitutional political crisis. the people's assembly is all belarusian. the people's assembly played a huge role in the twentieth year in february. that is, it is already now we are shaping our historical experience, including that of recent history, into a legislative form, that is, not something illusory, but something that already exists, something that has already been worked out and is laying a certain perspective. yes, we are pioneers here, but there is no need to be afraid of this, since we still rely on our understanding of our political system. and how to ensure the main principle that the people should be the source of power is good, but the main reproach

that yes is thrown at the authorities is that labor collectives. will not be presented practically as part of vns, the president spoke very clearly about this, how you will bring it up. eh, i'll tell you that when we had discussions now. here, uh, reproach, even far-fetched. well, that such a problem was not raised, people rather said how they could take part, you just need to be able to explain it, because the majority there will be just the same representatives of the labor collective. here is a concrete example. hmm , about a third is a deputy and, moreover, at all levels of the village councils and the president insisted that we be preserved in the constitution the village council is the one, the first level, when a person encounters a representative of authority or vice versa takes on part of this power, becoming a deputy from the village council to the national assembly of the house of

representatives of the council of the republic and this is not representatives of labor collectives. where do our deputies come from? we have deputies only in the house of representatives they work with a break from work, all the rest , look, these are doctors, teachers, businessmen. uh, it's got people from this or that collective well, we take further our main e, subjects of civil society, which will send trade union representatives to their representatives. well, a trade union is the flesh of the flesh of labor collectives. this is, in principle, the work of the collection of the belarusian, republican youth union. and where we have young people in the classroom and in labor collectives, they will also move in. the same applies to the veteran. belaya rus of the women's union is the representatives of these groups. and why do we have a question, when is a public association at all. if not they put forward with us the same director of the enterprise has quite a lot of worries about the economy and the provision of jobs for the sale of products. i can list further. we still have a

management and, uh, a team must uh task than an organization. here is the election. and why are there trade unions in this collective then, and why did they nominate their deputy from this collective either by collecting signatures or directly from the collective. this is their voice, their voice will be presented to the entire belarusian national assembly, so there is logic here. it seems obvious to me. i think it needs to be emphasized one moment the president. e drew attention to it well, delegates. it is not just that all the belarusian people's assembly should participate. they must then come to their labor collectives and report back. that is, they must then work with them. that may be what we lacked before the constitutional referendum, and before this law we had e we were delegates. well, we have worked out all the belarusian folk gathered. let's be honest, let's go. here i took part once and still no. now you're for life actions of the entire belarusian people's assembly. what makes it easier, first of all, to be responsible

to those who nominated you? it's not just you being present. communicated with like-minded people, worked there 1 2 3 more days, listened to the president, asked a question and discussed the program of socio-economic development. you are responsible for the implementation of this decision and, moreover, the powers that we vest in the entire belarusian people's assembly. they are huge, in fact, such a collective body, uh, in the hands of which the fate of our country will be. even in the most difficult situations good political party. yes, the second part of the second normative document that was discussed. here's a clear one for you. which parties should remain. that's what we discussed a lot on this topic, yes, and we had different points of view. look here. let's compare with those strange ones. where did the political parties come to us from here, in fact, they were reborn there of those parties that we study in the course,

classical political science, about which they wrote, scientists representatives of political science in the middle xx century. well, they don't. well, take it any, but oh well, there is an american system, it is special. well, take the french parties, but where are those classical socialists, galist communists, new movements are now being created. uh, very fast dynamics of political life, everything changes, and we are often offered. no , let's go back. here we will create something to that scheme of the fifties. we must, firstly, look at the trends, and secondly, proceed from our own interests , the party should not divide society. she is should represent the interests of a significant part of society, not necessarily everything, but not to divide the party should not demand the overthrow of the constitutional order. it can and should criticize the authorities, if it is not itself the authorities, but it cannot be

financed without leading to a civil split in the party, and abroad the party cannot be an instrument of an individual oligarch or hierarchical groups; it cannot be bought by some big businessman. these are the key requirements, but the party must also have some kind of ideology, the party cannot be created only to take part in one or another electoral campaign. and this is a very serious demand that the party must represent the whole of society. er, well, not necessarily. that's right, all citizens. but if this is a party, it should be in minsk, and it should be in vitebsk in all regions, except for the regional level. we have districts, but if not in all of them, well, at least in the third there should be structures, when a person comes out, he says, i am a representative of one party or another. we must understand. yes for him costs at least 10, they have 20-30 thousand members of the party. this is the program we understand with whom we are dealing, and if the party was created in order to cut grants

or satisfy someone's ambitions, why does the belarusian society need such a party and most importantly, god forbid, if this arises, it's in run way of manipulating our political system, usually from abroad. here are the clear barriers. you think that we have already got rid of random parties. here in your opinion, not yet, not yet, not yet. uh, let's wait the adoption of the law, then, as i understand it, the procedure for re-registration of parties must go through, probably some parties will leave. even obviously there will be new parties. uh, i don't know. can we talk about, uh, concrete examples here? well, i would still say, look how they showed themselves. the communist party works according to the norms, and many have tried to impose such an image. eh, this party is from the past. yes, this is it. where does it come from, only old people, well, there are historians. well, look how many young sheets have appeared

bright recognizable liberal democratic party. how it works, yes, yes, there are ambitions about white russia. well, let's see how the situation will develop. i see that there is. eh, some ideological ones. well, no matter how associations, but niches based on our constitutional system, which is not yet represented at the party level, it means that they may have appeared. i like your thought that was said. that's when we started discussing this block. eh, after all, it’s really not the vns, nor the party, the president does n’t really need them, they are personal. yeah, he doesn't need them portraits. indeed, in fact, the president has always communicated directly with the people, and this was his main distinguishing feature. here, in essence. we are talking about the fact that they should become the same parties, uniting them with such a uniting principle for protection against external threats, as if observing the main principle, everything is in the interests of their state. now, if we clearly understand this and convey this

moment, probably, well, it seems to me, then the understanding will be correct. let's just say alexander lukashenko, he is the creator. here that independent sovereign belarus as we know it. i think it's hard for anyone to argue with that. and now he understands. time is changing, and belarus is changing, and he wants to define it. uh, this is the political model, including the social model of our development, which will remain for many, uh, years ahead, and we are interested in this. this is where the president's interest coincides with the public interest. uh-huh i got such an idea pushed. look, we have been talking for several years in a row, including as part of our work lecturers, or are there speakers? uh, here, we already had a lecturer. i remember in truth mode well? yes, people reacted well, thanks to the people sitting here, among other things, it was such a collective work in fact.

look, we have been talking about the manual for several years. sharpe yes, and 50 years will already be next year does not work. look, well, yes, and essentially 2020. yes, he made professionals out of us, those who are already beginning to really understand what happened, how it happened and what we really don’t unique in all this, but we turned out to be the only ones who turned out to be too tough for the smell, because i really like it. as he says , it warms the shower a little, maybe we already have our own methodological manual in the knowledge society, and not anti-sharpa. yes, but on lukashenka's manual there is such a request, and m-m it is obvious to do this, i will just share with you an observation you have in your twentieth year. well , in general, we spoke today in the belarusian character. there is such a character, we don’t like to brag or show our own there , on the contrary, somewhere something hide. well, you know that there, uh, and the neighbors

did not envy, and so, well, just in case, so as not to jinx it. well, sometimes belarusians are not often treated like that, uh, and i noticed that a lot of colleagues in russia and even in foreign countries want to study this experience, but they do it so carefully. inviting to some events or coming here and now, not immediately, but gradually speaks. and how did you do it? uh, what did you do, and why did they do it this way and really look at us very seriously, not only adversaries, but also allies or potential allies. this belarusian experience is highly valued. and i think that we are already in lectures somewhere, talking at international conferences. e, including with statesmen of foreign countries outlined this experience. eh, well, it's probably time to generalize it and propose it in the form of some kind of possible one. i just won't do research. don't

just sprinkle stupid. i have stressed one point all the time writing until now this information is hanging in the free encyclopedia. yes, like wikipedia about what in order to to cope with that information war information struggle in the twentieth here, flew in. yes, a few. which provided this informational victory, and in fact, when we understand that we did it ourselves. uh, it's well worth the availability of information. yes, i want to ask, you were the dean of the faculty, you know how to communicate with young people. here are our enemies. they didn't calm down. they very much count on the younger generation, which will have the right to vote before the electoral campaign. yes, and the right to choose. they need such new blood to replace the one that either figured out the situation, or sat down, as they say, yes. so, are you going to use fashionable internet platforms and

talks in the same tiktok about the same genocide, continuing the previous questions here in order to be successful, do not try to be fashionable, but because there will be only an external form no result and no need work according to methodology. and there must be inspiration and there must be understanding. you know, like the military, they say you want to win, knowing becoming, but i'm not fighting according to the charter. here you must understand the algorithm of actions, what you must do, but if you speak only according to the charter, nothing will work. if you don’t know, the joint won’t work either, so we need to understand. this basis should be knowledge and a sense of the situation. well, we see how our president works. and as for the youth for 2 years. let me tell you, quite a lot has been honestly done, and we even see how the enemy reacts to this , uh, i won’t just

tell my society knowledge. e. well, we cooperate very closely with the ministry of education. look, the anthem is being performed in schools , and very serious systematic work is underway in historical education in patriotic education . we are already seeing the results i have talked to our military. and they emphasize that even the call has begun to change. these are the guys who join the army, now the armed forces are generally more widespread. and this is good. i would even say e well, not all problems. of course, we decided here in the youth ourselves this is by no means, but it is impossible not to see the trends that are positive for the more problematic age from 30 to 45. let's say these are former or young people who left not so long ago because of that age, and whom we missed somewhere in

those years when it could be underestimated the significance of ideology, a little embarrassed to talk about patriotism, at least as we do it now questions of the historical education of culture. let's put it straight, and then to our ideological opponents. there was just dominance, well, you see. we are here for you 91st to 2003 practically the word idea, let's say. here we are now, uh, we know our relationship to bull symbolism, yes. the twentieth year, the beginning of the nineteenth, let alone in the city center a store next to the academy of the ministry of internal affairs on masherov avenue, where everything is freely sold. and not only there you fly out at the airport. that's where it all is. it is sold virtually freely. here's what happened recently. and so, the generation that was formed in that period was young and young. you might even need to work with them be more in-depth than while with all

categories definitely. ah, you need to work, but we see from sociology, this is at least another one. well, then. if not new, then working form. yes, not informing the attitude towards them is different. well one of the biggest critics in front of you is how we do it. well, here you will agree largely depends on the specific speakers correctly, who are traveling correctly to a specific team. maybe i'll give you a little first. firewood into this fire, and then you will kindle it. yes, i am gasoline, i will tell you my impression, when i come to the team to perform, it is very important for me that the team is not selected in such a way that it is absolutely smooth. i want to have tough questions. and sometimes it still seems to me that these people are simply afraid to be introduced into this team, and there is such a thing, of course, it’s good. why? you are the most critical of me and i consider myself to be such, because

i had to go through all the stages. eh, this form of work. e has been introduced with us since 2003, when it actually began system policy. here is march 2003, the beginning of the state ideological policy was a big seminar the president signed, then decrees and off i was a teacher who was involved in this work. i was one of the leaders of the youth union, who also came at the information day. you correctly said that he was also the dean of the union of journalists. we were engaged in this, worked in the media , that is, i can see how it is organized, often there is a lot of formalism. that's what we write for. we were talking about training manuals, because for every day of informing, they write an appropriate brochure, relying on which, creatively, processing this information, it is necessary to convey the point of view that we sometimes get it. they just take and read out the hearing of the team, what we want to achieve. so

it's better, in general, not to hold such a day of informing , than to conduct a question. our speakers, recognizable hyped in copper, of course, will not arrive exactly on the day of information for each team. although, believe me, there are a lot of bright people in the region. we are in it 1. what wonderful historians we have in the regions i, well, amazing, in fact, that is, these people are local, maybe they are not so, recognizable at the national level, by the way, that's television, we need to raise them and to invite people from mogilev, vitebsk to grodny, to come here to minsk . yes, there must be. we see them now. by the way, we saw them during our actions. yes, your societies. in my opinion. can give us the text of the speakers who lacked today ready to do it and will do it. it's not empty words. so continuing the day of informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy director for ideological work and how we appoint them to a person who

simply reads this manual aloud. he probably shouldn't be in this position. it is rightly said that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well , the word is such a commodity, but this person must be unique, i understand, you won’t find such people everywhere , so we need to think here how to convey, maybe, uh, and it’s bad, uh, with these events. let's go one day let's do it. there are three and a half thousand meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk, to introduce seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy, they spilled where we invite bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online in the form, when we have a person who understands this problem through online can cover? docks krug e our teams we offer it. you see, even one beautiful tad-presentation, as you had in the mode

truth here you come with this, you don’t need to collect everyone. well, one speaker will come to the district on the topic of the information day and believe me, the whole district will know, there is no need to gather everyone there, there are 150 enterprises of people, the whole district will know, but it is important to live here the second part, so that officials and representatives of state authorities actually went out. these are two lines. this speaker is an expert who understands a particular problem and representatives of state authorities, for whom the day of informing is a way to communicate to learn about the problems of the team to answer people's questions. it does not always work out, yet, but we should think about improving this work. and in principle, if you like, our state ideological policy. that's in the broadest sense of the word. this is an informative and legal basis for the form of the method of work of organizational staffing . we need to restart, first of all, with those uh normative acts that were adopted back in the third and fourth year. wow,

how much time has passed the twentieth year has taught us a lot now on life teaches, and so i think the time has come. uh, not only such a serious big conversation, but the solution, uh, in this part, we had a seminar in june under the leadership of the president on work. here is this explanatory very sound thought. the president also spoke at this seminar there. e, noted the direction of the work and made a remark and criticized, but already half a year has passed. it seems to me, especially a year before the electoral campaign of our single day. which will be in the twenty-fourth year, just the time has come for such a systematization all this work and our achievements and shortcomings. a and. that's what we said, restart, if you like, i'll ask, maybe a provocative question. now yes, and i am the other two and do not expect knowledge, significantly 2/3 of all lectures were paid. yes, this is the system

assumed in your knowledge society. yes, and they now have paid lectures. i understand such a question always as well, here, let's just have an ideology. well let's just say it straight. no, somewhere, maybe, and uh, loads, of course, like a public one. i'll tell you straight. we have all performances within the framework, and the constitutional clarification campaigns were all free. well, here is a civil call, a patriotic call, all people work like that, but at the same time. well, let's take our expert. well, let's say it's up to the price. university well, firstly, he needs to break away from his main activity, often, this is a trip somewhere outside the same minsk if he himself is from minsk yes, and on the territory in minsk he needs to prepare very seriously for this, this is both emotional costs and intellectual they should be compensated. well, why not, especially if, uh, our

enterprises have allocated funds for this? after all, if the company orders, as we said, one color or another. well, his expenses for this work should be compensated from my point of view. this is correct. here is how to organize this work, and again, at a new level, we are now discussing such contracts, and many of our trade union organizations and enterprises conclude directly. eh, but we see that it still needs to be generalized in some way, again put on a new basis. speakers here, perhaps, in this situation, many themselves want to. listen, i this was such a case. we are on the talk show of vladimir rudolfovich. solovyov somehow mentioned this possibility when everyone arrived home. everyone says we will come. i think that our audience is waiting here, by the way, and certain surprises our phone cut off , they say when we are sad and hurt. that's all the same. here i say, belarus here we are,

sometimes we value someone else's. uh, well, the russians are not completely foreign to us, but there in moscow or somewhere else. well, let's say. it is too the same as with a musical performer will sing to perform here. you know this very well, as soon as fr. o. you see, you will play in our theater, well, the circle of theater-goers will know, as soon as somewhere not even in the series in moscow at the theater. as it is customary to say there, he will appear, he says, well, you see , they took it, so we feel it on our own, as soon as you become more likely to speak on moscow talk shows, as it were of course, let's talk about it directly, but at the same time i want to say that the level our specialists experts on the vast majority of problems is very high. here. the main thing on the same russian talk shows. you were the dean of the faculty of philosophy of the philosophy of social sciences, philosophy, sociology, psychology, social communications, social work, the key word is philosophy, it is, as it were,

understandable for everyone, and does not mean anything. well, that's all, yes, and the last ones are about a philosophical question, despite the fact that i would like to talk for a long time, but today the fight against russia has become a trend, right? of course, we were once a trend the minsk agreements and the end of the war. yes, in the donbass, for the sake of new trends in the fight against russia, wars with russia changed their shoes. even very strong politicians, as we thought. well , like the mercury of france, another attempt to repaint was ugly. sorry for such a very precise word many western politicians. they no longer stand, they didn’t pass in the same row, there’s nothing from their knees or a co-owner. i'm not saying that they can't stand on a par with ours, damn it. this is what needs to happen today for new european ones to emerge.