well, these are additional routes within the country , monitoring of the demand for passenger transportation will continue, if necessary, additional trains and wagons will be assigned in local traffic to belarusian schoolchildren from december 25, the winter holidays will begin to organize recreation , camps and sanatoriums will be involved, it is planned that more than 60,000 people will improve their health during the winter holidays . guys, winter vacations are also offered to adults in sanatoriums, 22,000 tickets have already been sold out. almost half of the tourists are foreigners. in total, in belarusian sanatoriums. at the beginning of the year, representatives of 50 countries have already had a rest, three dozen fallow deer individuals, replenished the species diversity of forest inhabitants in the varsha region, they were purchased under the state program belarusian forest in the north of the country novoselov was delivered from a hunting farm. minsk region. forestry specialists have equipped feeding troughs for the new inhabitants. salt licks on the territory of the watercourse animals will be kept here until mid- summer. prior to this, the enclosures were inhabited by 16 individuals of the noble. reindeer created all the conditions

for e favorable farting and for so that they get used to this place, the animals will be kept somewhere until mid-summer in july-august. uh, the fence will be removed, uh, and the animals will spread. here within the hunting economic. hello welcome everyone. who is with us now? we have a lot here, of course. what has accumulated of world significance will be dealt with, and we often partly start from this international with the global. however, today we will break the format, let's start today with us. this is absolutely clear and understandable. example. how to respond to pressure and, perhaps, one of the most resonant

fragments of the personnel day for presidents is monday, which is first. charged a-a leaders, and secondly, showed all determination in response to any pressure or not? i listen to some. ukrainian polish or finnish owners people remain technology remains production there are necessary electrodes. why are we preparing to work as your president now the issue of change of ownership is being resolved. and i think next year he's running something gone master, goodbye. goodbye. we don't know you. you don't know us want to. what a change of ownership since that moment the enterprises have been nationalized, what are we still waiting for, what a change of ownership. and how are we going to solve the issue of the government for half a year it is considered that this enterprise is yours gone?

wave to them to cross that they have left you property. this mcdonald 's says it. it works and people come and produce normal products. but the americans didn’t want this enterprise of ours, or who are the kazakhs, the russians, to work? well, as you wish, our people are not dumber than me said to cut this bun and shove it in there. lettuce or a piece of sausage, what is still left here. they didn't take anything with them. but if they had taken it, then i would have taken off the heads of the corresponding people. nobody has to take anything. you must not allow this. well we binge on your area talking responsibility, well goodbye. those stools are there. uh, other studios did what

we can’t do, especially if they did n’t take anything and people stayed, the owner left, well, go ahead and i wouldn’t consider it, only with point of view of justice and injustice. here, of course, the question is very deep and multi-layered, because we are talking about economic components, first of all, we provided conditions for work for foreign , i.e., investors-owners. and today . they leave enterprises for political reasons and leave us problems. the problem about it is that people do not work, our people who live in the regions, and here is the delay in this process, of course, it ’s wrong, but from a legal point of view, it’s not so easy to solve this issue here either the moment is not only dragging out, but in order to create the right precedent for belarus to show some new practice

of how these issues can be resolved, and for political reasons, i absolutely. eh, i agree with the approach that it needs to be dosed somehow either by economics or politics, when we start to mix things up, then all parties suffer, so i would approach this. that's the only way so far, i would say, this is how the first president protects the national interests of the country, the national interests of our economy, including the second in terms of legal uh, parliament, will pass any bills. i say now about it openly, which will be legally fixed. this is the third. i would like this meeting with the president to be broadcast in all russian media . why is it that the president, when he says not to take not a nail, not to withdraw nothing from what has been done here technology was brought to belarus? why has belarus created some conditions for investors to work quietly here, has belarus not provided all the conditions for enterprises to foreign developed. it is true, the third

point, why they leave, because the conditions are not forcing them to leave. this is another truth and forced to leave. this means that this is purely politics, the fourth point is international law. that is, if we are talking about legal issues, why do i say that this meeting was watched in russia and as our president does, i sometimes watch russian news and wonder guys there is a war going on. everything, in fact, they are taking away on the territory of europe america, you will be stripped of your these oligarchs into underpants. this means that the company's accounts are being frozen. and you are still sitting. saying. some french company is leaving. let's agree. let's make some conditions. what are the conditions, if you wanted to smell them and whistle turned off today all the red lines are passed. why isn't swift disabled? and it 's not good for me. they are afraid of those who say that we are scary to scare away invest , why it is that we will never change the legislation on investment - about investors, a conscientious investor. how did you work here

so it will work moreover, look at the statistics. first of the year first of all, from the beginning of all these events, investors in belarus how did they go so the question is where are they going today? they don't come from europe today, they come from the middle 100. central asia means the asian market is china and that's great. but one more thing let's be honest. for example, remember the statement of one lithuanian official who is extremely concerned that a businessman or lithuanian europeans are doing everything to circumvent the sanctions imposed by the european union and come to the russian belarusian market. here's the truth the truth is that european investors don't want to go anywhere with runaway investors. it 's not about the economy. it's about politics when they leave our national interests. we have an obligation to defend ourselves. this time and the second, our actions would be even more effective if russia and all the countries of the post-soviet space. let them see that the only way it's like this is heard. here sergey is now on the other side.

why are there no international precedents? it seems to me after our sky closed without trials and investigations and kao still gives birth to some reports of his own. and we have already stopped all airspace . it seems to me that after that we received a green corridor for any solutions for protection. professional cooperation kiev regime arrested actually stole, and there the property is worth millions of dollars in the form of a carriage of racing enterprises. e, those, e sets that were supposed to be assembled into an electric bus, trolleybus and such precedents can be in lithuania. show our terminal in the port of klaipets, there are enough of them. i'd i put some emphasis here. eh, just one more moment. here, if we compare russia and belarus. look, the russian federation made a bet in the 1900s on a foreign investor and, in fact, a foreign investor took control. e plant in togliatti kamaz other things, when they

left for political reasons, everyone is well aware of the political ones, the russian federation has lost these competencies. when we talk about the form of ownership and when strategic industries are in state ownership, it is clear that that these investors are not strategic. then we are talking about the economic sovereignty of our state. we saw this if we did not have such an economic basis as the mason tk our huge industries. imagine if they belonged to someone abroad, and they would have left so that we would do it, and remember at one time there was this pursuit in order to increase the share of small and medium-sized businesses. and for some reason it was proposed not to do it in parallel with the development of a large city- forming city. uh, there's a set of businesses, a it is to abolish large enterprises. we will now take it outside the city, not realizing that these strikes actually offered this sale of large large enterprises to bet on the so-called

small medium physical here. it is probably important to indicate, including for those of our viewers who may be watching us abroad that we are not trying to name the platform now, that now we are fighting foreign enterprises, we are specializing in speech about what is for belarus - this is an exceptional story and is forced, given that there was once credit of confidence, to those enterprises that were allowed to enter these sites, and now the state has obligations to the population that work, as these investors came to remind me. the president set the task. and so that these enterprises are, for the sovereignty of the republic of belarus, they do not oppose the republic of belarus and b, so that the enterprises are socially oriented. we are a social state, what we see here is an enterprise, or rather, the owners of these enterprises turned out to be politically biased and the second point. they uh abandoned their social obligations, that is, they violated the two basic conditions with which they came to the republic of belarus

, but we also see the relations of our country. that is, we do not liquidate these enterprises, we do not destroy workers. this is not the first time, a necessary measure. let's remember a communal apartment in the early 1990s, when some owner somehow got this communal apartment back in the early nineties. there , in the ninety-second year, he left for the united states of america. then just exploited this enterprise, bringing it to a slightly semi-bankrupt foreign state, is the kind of sanction that the west is trying to use against us, so we are responding to sanctions in this way, but i want one small point. remember, in the average dream of any entrepreneur in belarus or russia, this is a must when you open an account abroad, buy some real estate there and transfer part of your assets there. unfortunately it's true. now what's the plus and so we are 30 years old fed europe all the welfare of europe at the expense of us, and now it is over. now. i think every entrepreneur in the

country. and we must support them and will support them, we must finally understand that the only way to save your money is the only way to become successful. it is to develop your own country. and god forbid that in russia it is heard, of course there is. i would look at this issue even more broadly, not only in terms of national security policy. we now see an attempt within the framework of a hybrid war, using both politics and economics and informational pressure, to defeat the country, given that the nuclear powers cannot use nuclear weapons, the potential is too great and everything threatens a complete catastrophe. no less effective measures of destruction are now being applied. e of the opposing state. it's right here. uh, economic such kind of sabotage. see what happens in the russian federation, not a single bearing ball of its own left caused it to stop

production of ball bearings. it seems like a trifle in moscow there were only two factories and now there is not one, and because of this, not a car. not planes, not tanks, not everything else, and they thank the belarusians for keeping our state-owned bearing plant in minsk. although there were proposals to close it for perspective, because there are swedish german chinese bearings. and now it turned out that when there was opposition on the verge of military action, that these are the factories that have been preserved in our country. they are now playing strategic damage. not only for our states for the entire union state. let's go further in this, continuing the theme of the development of sovereignty, we saw a big meeting of its president the day before. development of sovereignty. in this case, creating such foundations of the state. hey whites. updated the constitution by referendum and accordingly. these are quite serious, and fundamental changes have taken place in certain articles and areas, and

accordingly it is necessary to adapt the legislation to approach this reasonably on the eve of two, probably the most important issues. it was always the russian people's assembly and the poly party for a long time, so we saw that there was an attempt to find an image. this is what will happen. on the one hand, this updated status of the federal tax service is not a new phenomenon for us, but the updated presidents clearly said that this will be the stabilizer of the society. and this is its main role. and if the need arises, then it will be necessary to negotiate on its site, and the second point, including meetings, is the president, when he visited, labor collectives there, people periodically, when he came in. uh, this topic a they asked, and who will be in this navy. that's why it's about us, so the presidents answered. and the question is who will be included in the vns? let's listen now to the composition of the vns. representatives of all strata of the belarusian society will enter. and this is the main thing. well, i noticed that some labor collectives raised the question. but how can these dudes not have a

regular meeting of officials, and so on, how labor collectives will be represented. well, maybe you didn't get through to people, didn't explain it to them, but representatives of labor collectives will have a percentage there. the only way to move into it assembly somewhat different, not directly assembled. the plant nominated its representative , and he is represented in the all-belarusian people's assembly by deputies from the party of public organizations. all will be people. and this is labor collectives. these are teachers. this is the worker - these are the peasants - these are the doctors and so on. but they must be professionals. these are not wedding generals who came and sat. whoever understood something, didn’t understand it, served time and left, there shouldn’t be such people there, and we must do everything so that the delegates return

to their workplaces they reported to the labor collectives on the issues that were considered at the all-belarusian people's assembly. we will do it in the best way, despite the fact that there will be respected people in the national assembly. it cannot interfere in the activities of other bodies, replace them to perform their functions with the belarusian people's assembly, in fact, it must be preserved as a political institution. they develop into some kind of bureaucratic body. everything is laid out very clearly. that is, we are waiting now, when the parliamentarian finally everything will be approved, yes, how are you? you see, this is the process that the belarusians are now conducting and pretending. well, vns is a response to the request of society, and this request lies in the fact that horizontal communication. it should become the basis of this

broad representation - this is ownership in the general population and responsibility. it seems to me that the latter is such mobility appears. he understands something, like he, maybe, that's some kind of horizontal. yes, because uh, when we talk about vertical, uh, we mean what alexandrovich said is officials, and so that it does not turn out. here in the assembly of officials here is really something, but it is a broad representation and the most important thing is responsibility. although, it is not very rare for us to hear this word. we talk more about representation than responsibility. he really needs to be put in the first place, when e people are involved in making any decisions, they should get used to taking responsibility, not to say what is bad, but to suggest, how to do better and to take the responsibility. i would consider it that way. i would like to make two points. the first president thinks not only about what is happening now, because now i am going to visit the regions, people, on the contrary, are asking a question. listen, what kind of democracy is there. what

are you doing there, in general, sometimes they ask such a situation like this. let our dad take everything into his own hands completely from beginning to end. and in general, so that everyone just sits and performs. and this, in principle, will now cause an absolutely normal reaction in people, but with this is what i want people to hear. we are democracy, we are actually developing these bills that the president spoke yesterday - these are the people of power, but what does the president think about, as i see it, he thinks that in 10-15-20 years, so that the fate of belarus will never be decided on the street political issues were not resolved with the help of a baton of a stick, the confrontation of some political groups of groupers. for this we led. this is all the belarusian assembly , moreover, this is a people's body after the referendum, because the constitution of the people's we can be proud of her. remember how we received it, it is truly folk. she was supported by the absolute majority of belarusians and the absolute majority of belarusians, they said that all the belarusian people's assembly would be and the president summed up the discussion today

, that the most important thing would not be the loosening of the balance of power. there is a parliament - this is the legislative power. there is a president of the council of ministers. the vertical is the executive branch. what is all about the russian assembly a strategic political body that will not interfere with activities, for example, liberal democratic party, but i will follow its decisions as the leader of the party, because the people have decided, and within the framework of these decisions with the communists. let's argue like uh, we 'll talk about these, by the way, about sports. yes, more about political parties. the most important thing is that the president said here that the entire belarusian people's assembly is responsible for the function. that's it. uh, recognition of the legitimacy of the system and the right of succession. that's when we say stabilizer. this is our answer practically to the maidan let's speak directly we wanted in the twentieth year. to do the ukrainian scenario here, they have this negative scenario, that is, lawlessness, chaos, anarchy, riots, coup d'état. we propose

a system that will stabilize and be responsible for legitimacy. and what is legitimacy in jurisprudence in political science is illegality, that is, legality, compliance with the procedure. and this is the perception of a person by society, that the power is generally recognized, that its decision must be carried out. this is a very subtle psychological moment, and here everything belarusian folk the assembly will play a role and the second moment. this is the right of succession, why they were talking about 10-15 years, so that someone would not suddenly come to some incomprehensible person, and would not start to break everything. uh, let's just talk to the young states. this often happens and you will see how to act on it in germa not. yes, there quickly everyone who suddenly thought there, somewhere on the internet, will immediately be found and imprisoned. we also need to have healthy authorities, and the president. let's

be honest, the founding father of the sovereign independent new belarus is here the one we've been living for 30 years. uh, so that this one, as i call him collective lukashenka, he continued, uh, to exist after lukashenka and yes, such an analogy suggests itself to me. i think about it all the time. so, when we were choosing a place for a nuclear power plant, we were looking for a geological plate that was large and motionless to the earth shaking. here i have such an association that the entire belarusian people's assembly is the same solid slab that is not subjected to earthquakes, which are at the heart of the state. we know that hierarchical systems vertical vertical systems. they are subject to destruction in due time. the collapse of the monarchy, we remember the collapse of the soviet union, where there was also a vertical, and it is necessary to build a system that would rely on popular

representation and regardless of the incidents that can occur in the power vertical. if we simply say that the vertical is always, to one degree or another, about the elite. and here is the horizontal one. the history of vns is about the most. what exactly, if she is a nationality? yes, the second topic is still, which discussed on is closely connected with the federal tax service - these are political parties. that's where it sounded clearly in the political field and the president said. uh, only those parties should work in my political field of the country whose activities correspond to the basic principles of domestic and foreign policy to act from citizens, and here i am, aleksey sergeevich , suggests that some of the opponents are already writing in this vein, trying to look for. what yeah. this means a green corridor is being created, exclusively for pro-government parties. well , in short, who will read it is carefully, he will understand that there is no pro-government correspondence to domestic foreign policy - this is patriotism, but it does not determine whether a liberal democrat is a socialist or a communist. yes, but how do you

see it for yourself? why those who are trying to distort are wrong, i will tell you. so there are no people and countries where everyone has the same opinion. it's true, and that's what political parties are for. they can be criticized and need to be criticized that they are not perfect, but a person can express his point of view, either in legal politics, or on the street . god forbid the street, only the legal political path is further. the street, too, maybe legal, if we're talking about the street, when, uh, yes, chaos and destruction, so now it's moving on. did someone say either in the new law or the president yesterday at a meeting said that one cannot criticize one can criticize one can have a different point of view one can not oppose stable states. it means you oppose the people, which we are now talking about once and there is in some country a world that teaches all democracies allow the existence of political parties that will come out and say i am against the existing constitution we want to destroy everything and start acting. let me give you a simple

example first. how can there be a party in the country that opposes the state symbols under which we live and which has been accepted by all the people. and we had such parties. they have not yet been eliminated. no. is it possible to be a party that speaks openly. we will completely change the geopolitical vector of development of the country, we will destroy all ties, we will destroy it, therefore i translate and explain to criticize it can be argued it is possible and necessary to argue this development of the country, but within the framework of the constitution and above all of us the belarusian assembly will stand in itself. like this slab, where we will know that the people at the meeting determined the course such and such, and we will argue how to come to these decisions, how to make people live better, so that healthcare would be better educated economy, but does not destroy the country and this is a normal civilized way. uh, we we will adopt a law on political parties in the near future in parliament yesterday, after which it will go to parliament now. we will discuss it. there will be another discussion, and in the end, all

this will strengthen our state. that is, i am convinced of this that i will win, but in fact, we see, if we look at the oldest, probably such a party system, the political great britain, then we will see the conservatives and laborites there. and they fight hard with each other. we see this, they have a culture of behavior in parliament in general. absolutely wild for us, but it has developed historically, that is, culture. it’s not chaos, it’s happening there even though they seem to be radically different, while both those and other patriots, and those others know the limits, beyond which they will be considered traitors to the motherland and the relevant legislation will work against them. that is, such a mechanism is proposed now. yes , of course, i absolutely agree with you that this exists in all countries. uh, we really need a dialogue. in parties, probably, at some sharp moments , strategic sports are also needed, but uh, this is what is being done at us, it seems to me, this is, uh, such a

belarusian experience to teach parties to talk to each other, because we do not have much experience in party building. and the parties of e are not very popular among the population and it will be quite difficult to explain which party to choose, because they will have to learn how to talk not only among themselves, but also with the population to do ordinary advertising to attract them. e voters party members. this is such a very complex mechanism. a and e vns. eh, it seems to me, yes, this will be the platform that will allow. uh, to unite all these multidirectional currents, but, and the e parties should not rely only on the navy, they must learn to create their own political culture, their own political field in which they will work vns - this is not a prop. and it's a little bit different, we should have two two platforms. these are political parties. it's uh, vns. eh, and vns, after all, this is not the

answer. and for some external pressure, this is what we were going for. we have had it for a long time from the very beginning and we are just completing this process. today instead of starting it. let's continue. he has a few more important topics to discuss. i think that one way or another, because we have touched on. now we will return talking about sovereignty. and this is really one of the main signs of the state and we see that today hail has been knocked down all the time, just these days there is a powerful surge of tension around serbia cosmos president vučić called the night of december 12 the most difficult night in his life, the aggravation began after prime minister from imbo, divulged to the republic, kosovo course stated that the nato contingent would remove the barricades built by kostovo from the roads in the north. so, in fact, he put forward an ultimatum, if the serbs are not dispersed by nato, then the local police will go into action. vučić held an emergency meeting of the security council and accused the united states before, but germany considers

serbia's plans to ask nato to deploy its armed forces in kosovo unacceptable for non-compliance with the agreements reached earlier on space. this is a statement by the head of the german foreign ministry berberg, it is noteworthy that a new round of tension happened just a week after the historical one. as participants in the eu summit called it, the western balkans in tyranny. and now borisovich himself what kind of partners turned out to be a week ago. they patted the student on the shoulder and talked. there is the balkans, we are one family here, and today this is it. well, everything, the fact is that the balkans are full of contradictions even between fraternal countries that have one language, one religion, and they are even ethnically the same nation, let's take the serbs, take the croats, take the montenegrins. you see, it means the most the latter broke away from serbia and before that there were slovenia and croatia, the contradictions are great and these contradictions are played by western countries

that do not want a stable coalition of slavic countries to form, uh, which are allied russia of the pre-war confrontation. here it comes now. well, i think the wuch understands that from a military point of view. uh, serbia ca n't oppose a bloc with nato, and given that kosovo has the largest military base of the united states, uh, uh, eastern europe, i think that, of course it will not come to military action. unless there's some kind of spontaneous wildfire. understandably interesting americans. everything is clear here, they have already said about it and on the basis of what is it worth, and, besides, this destabilizing factor in the european union, but why the european one? it would seem that this is not necessary, but we see. block we see a barrel that is clearly on the side of the brishna in this conflict and they are also undermining little ukraine and little tension. turkey greece with small grants, they need to blow more

the balkans will sink faster than food. i just want to say that we are somewhat, perhaps misleadingly , placing emphasis, please, all this policy is being determined, the united states of america is so simple, all these policies are managed, it’s obvious that i think there is compromising evidence of the united states on all these policies, see mother merkel’s statement which, in general, such a mother, whose stepmother had such a statement, undermined her political career, there are such experts who believe that here is compromising evidence and merkel's connections with the guards, which allow the united states. america to manipulate her. and this is her and her statement that the minsk agreements were just a gain of time for the ukrainian army is a demonstration for russia that in europe it is impossible to negotiate with anyone, but it is necessary to negotiate only with the united states, as soon as the macron

declared that he is ready for negotiations there to ensure the interests of russia, it cost schulz, there and someone else, as a statement was immediately followed, which was supposed to show putin that there are no people in europe with whom you can talk. we must understand that serbia is in a very difficult situation. that is, they have extremely limited maneuvers for action. remember they imposed sanctions against belarus. they didn’t want in relation to russia, uh, they didn’t introduce it yet in relation to belarus, they were forced to. we understand very well, although by and large they should remember how lukashenka flew there in 1999. i remember under the bombardments i remember, and so we are somewhere, despite the fact that this decision was unpleasant. well, we understand, but the second point is that you are asking whether there will be a military confrontation or there will be no bora. why are they for? borol defends the interests of not europe, all his statements over the past year. they are destroying the european union. and this, including, if the americans need a military

conflict, it will be, and they will keep this conflict smoldering on purpose, for which the worst thing for them is a strong, powerful europe without waste, which can really become a competitor for the united states. it is not necessary. ukraine will start to lose even more. they are understand that ukraine will never lose ukraine. what they still have will not win in this conflict. they also have transnistria moldova where you can play around, you can play around in central asia, they will try around russia, but in europe itself, why should there be peace in serbia, why do they need it? they parodied this conflict all their lives. uh, how it all began, who destroyed yugoslavia, who split it, and who controls kosovo, who forced it to recognize and create an international precedent, who finances all the business corporations there, who cell phone belongs. americans own everything, so if they need it, they will do it. but if europe were truly independent, if germany really wanted to be the leader of the

european union today, if there was a world to expel the americans to sit down at the negotiating table and agree, it would be a completely different story and i would not agree here that the european union is acting purely at the behest of the americans here why? because let me remind you that it was not america that began to destroy yugoslavia, but in general the first the geopolitical operation of the federal republic of germany, genscher, croatia, slovenia and the european union has the task of including serbia in the eu before the year 25. and the conditions for this inclusion is the recognition of kosoy as independent. as you can admit , now there is a strong pressure on the time when russia is diverted to a special military operation. the second moment, a gas pipeline from turkey passes through serbia, which supplies gas to hungary and europe, this is one of the few

after the explosions of the northern streams and the stop in e, through poland pipeline, which it is also necessary to stop a small armed conflict with the undermining of this gas pipeline. that 's all, maybe. uh, i think that here we are now reaping our strategic union state and russia in the zero years, when we were stunned, the westerners made a mistake, because serbia then asked for a union state and for the dkb. she was also an observer in the eurasian union. it was possible to include, but we did not offer her at the moment when it was possible road maps for integration today, unfortunately, we have we read media reports kosovo will officially hand over they are trying to use the application to join the european union and bosnia herzegovina has already received the status of a candidate for eu membership because of the problems that turkish influence in the region had and, by the way, claims to have.

and olguine. we touched upon the topic, indeed merkel yes, we saw this revelation when she said that, in fact, the minsk agreements were a screen, everyone already understood that this is absolutely fake. we saw their faces, which then in the palace of independence, we saw the real achievements that were in eventually. and do you think she will ever admit that, among other things, it will forever remain on her conscience that they never finished these minsk agreements in order to prevent what we are now seeing, for example, in ukraine merkel’s position it caused a mixed reaction not only among us, but also in the west. here, i would pay more attention to this and, uh, in austria, a very noisy statement has already followed. yes, these kants and austrian hein with christian are fine speaking. moreover, at the round table, which is dedicated he said to ukraine, it is frightened by some kind of frankness frau. merkel talks about it. thus. we destroy any basis for trust. and yes, and therefore, as if the

reaction from europe, it is more important. uh, does mrs. merkel ever admit what she meant by these words ? well, i think that, of course, it will happen. although it will be such a difficult moment. we must understand that she is saying this in the context of the island of crisis that is taking place in relations with russia and she is largely connected, and the common european position, in addition, there is a lot of pressure on her. in connection with the fact that it was she who pushed through, as they call it now, gas. uh, these contracts, and so she is forced, of course, to talk about her specific political line. and so with such luggage, surely she has for the number of years that she spent in power in germany, the largest state of the european union, if there are many positive moments and the support of the population. even this does not allow her to be immune from the

pressure obtained. yes, sure. i think, that today all european politicians are under such severe pressure. i would not speak about the pressure of aggression and about what all of them, even the former ones, should express, but a certain position in relation to, uh, russia, and to the conflict that is taking place. well, i think there is still a moment and responsibility, which will come later. i think that each of them, uh, thinks very seriously about the fact that the conflict will ever end, how it will end lays some bricks of how it will be explained in the future, that merkel has dramatically changed her position, because she is over. for only 22 years, this one has been criticized for being very gentle and beautifully advocating dialogue. and then abruptly. she retired, afraid that she would be taken away, would have been silent, would have been a heroine in the

west. uh, there is such a culture of censure, the so-called line, and it is very effective today. this is the most powerful psychological pressure that matters. than can be, yes, some more important confession of the reasons for merkel's behavior like this this is the strongest information fund. they are really under a lot of pressure right now, but in short, merkel not only deceived all the jews, everything throughout her time as a chancellor contradicts what she said, she and the gas agreements. it pushed the ideologists and was much sincere when they forgot about merkel, let her justify herself to her citizens before history later, but the coup d'état in germany, what is this? same in general, some just i apologize for the expression, but the circus. eh, they ordered a scholz. here's to someone that he had his ratings it took that there will be more and more such coups d'etat in europe now. yes, it means that against the backdrop of growing protests, the dissatisfaction of the german population of the european union, the

economic situation, the political situation. it is necessary in some way to return people to the fold, loyalty, or at least fear, therefore, a set of measures is underway, the first intimidation of a nuclear war, not russia as much as belarus to raise this topic of a nuclear threat. tomorrow the war will strike tomorrow so that the europeans will sit hungry and cold, lord, okay, what is here, the second they want to destroy our country with a coup. tomorrow the nazis will come to power. nala, who is there to correspond on the net. what kind of coup is funny to watch, it's like a serious policy, but in the information media, because the world is ruled by information, uh, the media is power. now in europe there is one lie every day and a person wakes up and frightens him. yesterday, the coup was prevented and the fascists were detained. they shot you in a nuclear war. maybe tomorrow the next one will start, which is scary. putin has something else in mind. tomorrow you will still lose weight, sit and lose sergeyevich, it turns out,

which means, but they put pressure on the opposition in the form of an alternative for germany . they strengthened the police presence in the cities; they raised it in no way through the rating; why did the entire ruling european empire have to benefit? call it what you want, great! i saw this power outage, which, as it were, was also called the main one of the main reasons for the terrorist threat. history is warm. yes, this is something that is connected with reality, and not heinrich there is some thirteenth seventy-year-old. yes, white 13, now they will answer for everything. today. uh, energy crisis issues. it is one of the sharpest and it is obvious that winter is coming. and, as

it were, this entire information agenda, it is very much condensed, so it will be necessary. democratic, then it is necessary to give some kind of democratic settings so that people understand. uh, why is this happening, but i have more more scares. this is a realistic threat, because its introduction is already at the first stage. when the proceedings have not yet taken place, it means that there will be a very strict centralization of power. and if we are talking about belarus then, i would not see any danger here. and when we talk about germany and about the fact that power is beginning to be concentrated, then i would see a very alarming bell here. he immediately we are thrown back to the thirties, when these processes were already held twice in germany and. uh, even in the middle ages, germany needed to be dispersed here so that it did not pose a danger. i want to continue the thought that came up here comparing e with

germany in the thirties. the point is that historical analogies arise. remember the arson of the restaga. and here is an attempt. uh. well, let's say destroy the bundestag and kidnap the chancellor. for what it was done, coming in a democratic way of the classics. hitler decided to clean up the completely political field to destroy the positional party, which could interfere with it, therefore, the largest political party of communist germany due to the arson of the restaga, was almost completely destroyed. here we beg an analogy, but here the non-communist party opponents, the ruling alternative for germany, it is clear that here this alternative will not be the way to go. yes, in order to destroy the alternative and many say fascisization is taking place fascisization of germany and obviously we are witnesses of this process, two more the most important topics. we need time to discuss. we

are continuing another important topic - the topic of our geopolitical appetites in the western neighbor. warsaw, a lot is now being written on this subject of various materials, but, probably, most, succinctly. this is still a statement by the head of the russian foreign intelligence service , sergei naryshkin, who said, let me remind you, warsaw is speeding up preparations for the connection of the western ukrainian lands of the territory of lvov ivan frankivska and most of the ternopil region of ukraine, this is consistent with the strategic goal poland in the 21st century. well, let's now listen to the chairman of the euro-atlantic association in poland zhemark nowakovsky. this person believes that poland's strategic goals are pushing russia into asia by expelling the superpowers from the club. it is the way to this goal, and there is another way to cut off russia from the shortest transit route to europe that is, to wrest it from the union state. whom?

in your telegram channel, you have detailed the republic of belarus, piotr , both the context of this statement and the possible consequences. share your thoughts please. here, when novakovsky's zhemarkok, this is not some kind of marginal. this is the head of one of the central thought factories that organized expert support for poland's accession to the eu and nato; today he interacts at an expert level with e-e nato and the european union on the so-called euro-atlantic e, solidarity, so he actually recognizes poland as a proxy for the power of the collective west and see it as a national interest more. what a national interest it is scary to voice, but it is important for them. here is the zone of contact with eurasian union as a union state is to move east, and for belarus and ukraine ukraine to be at war with russia a. poland and poland got everything from this. uh, the most

delicious dividends, that is, cheap labor . uh, markets and in fact. uh, the puppet government and the states on this account they finance marovetsky recently said about this and admitted the same tikhonovskaya of the same fugitives and others, and so on, because in addition to the theoretical base, if practically steps on this subject the day before, the ministry of internal affairs of belarus reported that the received information about creation of a paramilitary extremist formation in poland lithuania. that is, the unification is already underway, and, the commonwealth violation, the structural divisions of the weapons included in it, their goal is the organization of encroachments on the territorial integrity of sovereignty, the basis of the constitutional order of public security of the republic of belarus and the day before. we have seen both in social networks. i think our viewers have already seen the statement. here is an interview again and again, when these fighters of these detachments say ukraine for us, we warm up. we're warming up here. and then we go to belarus, so they did not hide this in the

twentieth year, the density of such statements is becoming more and more to talk about, what about the fact that the money allocated by polish instructors, uh, are preparing specific saboteurs, extremists and terrorists. this is also recognized by polish experts. e, the head of the polish geopolitical society, the kola pro. this has been said for a long time, that is, poland is preparing to destabilize the situation in belarus by expanding the war zone to our territory. here their task. they created the entire infrastructure for this. unfortunately, they also want this for a reason. in what we should talk about the reasons, here is the plan that the head of russian intelligence said. here's what we need to understand. the first annexation of ukraine is already underway, and today ukraine is already dividing it than what it owns, it has nothing . she if before the beginning of her she had. you know such, at least elementary remnants

of sovereignty and property, but today they have to give what they have not yet given away for 100 years, and children and grandchildren already they won’t give it back, and western ukraine is already quietly buying up and belongs to non-ukrainians for a long time, as far as we are concerned. the most important thing in this regard is that without us, without belarus , it is impossible to implement the plans of poland and the west in general, in this context, the weakening and destruction of russia is impossible, and no one will leave us behind. not in the twenty- fourth, not in the twenty-fifth. not in the thirtieth. we must forget these illusions. if someone says now, everything is fine. it all ended there. it didn't end with lukashenka every day, he says at every meeting that nothing has ended. and one more statement by the president, which is extremely significant for me, which made a splash, including in the western media, that he said it for the first time, they said it before other. he did not say the essence of the president. it sounds very different. what he knows very well about the plans of the west in the twentieth year,

then op, uh, the destruction of belarus and attacks on the russian federation , unleashing a war, if the special operation had not begun, the president said, now my friends, we are returning to the 20th year, which someone may be tired of discussing. well, no one else understands that in the twentieth year. if there, god forbid, a coup d'etat began, there would be a war, only for this we are needed for the war with russia, as ukraine did, the poor, this unfortunate ukrainian people for the war, and the belarusian people would be used for the war against their will for the war and only for war it cannot be otherwise , therefore, no one will lag behind the conclusion alone. no one will be left behind, theoretically divisions will be introduced here. what do you think, some kind of regiment will attack, it does everything wrong, and there will be a return here to the territory of belarus of our citizens who were recruited by them to take root in ordinary life, then what is being done? underminings that will go around the

country, destabilization of the situation will pop up the unfinished fifth political column, which will suddenly say we are going to the polls. we changed our minds, we are going to fight, that is, for this, in everything we must be ready for, the war begins in the 21st century. it’s a little different on june 22 from the bomber. yes this more, well, we've lost the word hybrid war a bit. and in general, the main meaning of this concept, as nato ideologists explain. all this dirty work on the territory of the state should be carried out by the citizens of these countries, that is, with the support of the financial instructor's ideological economy. that is, now we are in a state of a certain phase of a hybrid war against belarus, this is, first of all, a war. this is an economic war. this is poli's war. but the next phase is a proxy war, that is,

an attempt by the hands of those people whom he declares armed belarusian opposition to break through the belarusian border here to organize a kind of window. it sounds a little strange that the capture of the regional center by these armed oppositionists and through this window on the territory of belarus a stream of pmc fighters of pmc volunteers of various kinds of vacationers of the polish army should gush. and in general, any trash from all over the world is an attempt to unleash a civil conflict, usually after a civil conflict, a foreign military intervention and, in fact, this is why our president called for the deployment of a regional group of troops here in as a precautionary measure, but sergei correctly said that given our most important. the geopolitical position, because belarus practically holds the heart of russia in its hands, it is moscow's central, industrial district. and if this territory

is occupied. to put it bluntly, with troops on this one, then it will be practically impossible to keep moscow and protect it from a strike with both conventional and weapons of mass destruction, and it will be possible to dictate any conditions to moscow. i believe that more is still only making a claim to the status of a great power and does not actually possess opportunities that will enable it to carry out annexation. there is a good expression about annexation. do not rush. and it’s like we ’ll see ahead, but it seems to me that we are more a little overestimating and underestimating ourselves. uh, on the agenda. here in the information we somehow connect ourselves. e with russia and, e, the value of belarus for poland in itself. she's kind of bogged down. it seems to me that the steps that poland is taking to strengthen its defense capability. they are connected not only with the russian federation but and with the strengthening of belarus itself. and i

think that the poles are not so unambiguous about the potential of belarus, including their political one, and those statements that it makes about raising rates are connected precisely with this. i would also watch it this way, because time moves on. won touch us 100 years will remember 100 years. and now we have to prepare like this, if suddenly they just have something in the head of this stupid polish elite . remember 100 years you will remember that you climbed into belarus like your ancestors there will be nothing. er, still. i would like you to get out of this very dense discussion to some know such vectors on what fairways. what should be the focus of our society? so we started by saying that there is a global understanding of ourselves in the state. yes, because the improvement of the constitution this is democracy in the form of an updated vns, and political parties that will be more responsible in understanding that you are not only fighting for power. but how are you

patriot fighting for power in parallel. we see that the state is working to not stand alone against threats in a. bishkek itself showed that the president calls on his partners not only to strengthen, but not only ties within the union, well, finally, to abandon barriers, when when not now, he proposes to scale up and already hold summits together with the sco, together with the brix, that is, we see that our authorities, they have a clear understanding of where and where we are going from here to all of us, what is necessary in order for this the way was the most effective, it is the outer contour of all the proposals of belarus e, they are stable for a long time. we just didn't pay much attention to it in the old days. but today it is clear and what is being proposed by belarus is, first of all, proactive work so that we do not integrate, then at some stage, but form a new

reality, about which we are talking a lot right now and, uh, financial systems . here is the circulatory system, which was like this the expression that has spread in the media is just the stabilizer that is needed today, if we are talking about industrial cooperation, then this story is long. can be carried out simultaneously then financial issues within the framework. er, i'm eu and wider for the region. this is what needs to be done now is what will stabilize us. it is very important for us today to preserve and increase the entire chain of security and economic development. and this we can do. let's be honest with the world when it's only blocking then in this way, when we make our clear priority. and we will implement this priority. this is the idea of ​​the president of belarus that let's make the eu platform plus the sco plus brix for our export

-oriented economy very important for our security system. today we must influence the emerging new architecture of the collective east and play not the last violin there. yes, we are 9.5 million citizens, but there is a european example. in fact, there is nato holland belgium are also small countries, but they are included and very well included. at difference from the baltic states of the same thanks. yeah. here the idea was sounded that belarus is playing ahead of the curve - this is absolutely true, and the point here is not only in the economy, but really in the changing architecture of the world. we see that this is the global policy that was previously carried out by the strange collective west, but it is now in crisis and, on the contrary, the east is now on the rise, countries are developing not only in terms of economy, but also in terms of awareness of their place in this world. and in general, we understand that we are on the way it is with these countries that

the coach of world development now determines, uh, the progressive development of it. we still hope that the world is not facing regression and a gloomy future, not death, but civilization. and yet further development took place. i think that's exactly why the president. he tries, uh, to integrate precisely into this part of humanity with this part of humanity. and in general, belarus should not just be as they say, like everyone else, but it should find its place and stand out in this general diversity. as it says in this flower garden, our color should be red-green to be all of this. i sometimes understand people who, looking at the events taking place in the world around us, would like us to close our merke , deal only with our own problems and live in peace anywhere, without interfering, despite these geopolitical processes, it will not work. the trouble is that they won't give it, and today there is a plus one. so, when i saw

lukashenka's statement, the last ones on the joint summit, on the idea of ​​further integration within the eu, we discussed the model a lot in this studio the future that we can offer to the countries of the soviet union belarusians russia today i see this model of the future. i see that it is in the head and the president is very clearly formulated. how to protect our emotional interests and how to make not only russia, but everything in the soviet space stronger, and in my opinion, the only way to do this now is for everyone to do their job as a politician, their economist, their military, and so on. i think that everything will work out for us. thank you very much for participating in this conversation in this program. all is happy for today. propaganda can be different, but this will

not make them better understand what to do in real life. i will explain the author of the project propaganda is considered in detail widely, the topics discussed analyzes the facts, gives arguments and refutes rumors, any important decision at the state level should have a clear goal, why we are doing this, and the end results should be better for people. my name is igor tur. it was my propaganda see the new releases at tv channel belarus 24. they can play not only with muscles, but also with their heads. in what sport? the trophy of which football tournament is called

eared champions the champions league, of course, from its unusual shape, participants will earn points for correct answers, and for losing them incorrectly, which of these players has more awards for the best player of the month in arsenal arshavin absolutely right or what are we playing? which of these athletes? on the left, watch the intellectually entertaining show heading on belarus 24 tv channel.

you are watching the panorama live with you tatyana korol. good evening. let's get together . the results of this day are the union construction of the economy with an emphasis on import substitution and the friendship strategy in all directions.