there is a development of more technologically complex drugs, if you look at our market in percentage terms, what is the share of domestic drugs in recent years in terms of itself? this is usually parity, that's 50 52% of belarusian e in packages. e, if we take the average, then it is 670%, but if we divide the retail and hospital segments in the hospital segment 70, and in some e, health care organizations even up to 90. this already depends on the direction of the health care organization. well, on average, this is a good indicator, of course, many countries in the world do not have such a developed franchise, that is, for our country with such a population as ours, we have a very good number of drugs, a good number of factories. that is, we have been actively developing the export direction recently towards export. we 'll be back. recently, more and more often in all industries. we are talking about such a concept

as import substitution, your industry is also no exception. how secure are we here and is it possible to talk about security, uh, in this sector, starting from raw materials, ending there equipment and end products. well, here we need to take into account such moments, that is, practically, well, in fact, if we start from the production of a substance, that is, the active components of medicines, but, in fact, all production is concentrated in two countries. china and other large countries are no exception. they are also bought at the station there, and the situation with the spread of the coronavirus infection has shown the need to diversify a little. and we are also coming to this now, development and substances are being worked out production, but not a single country in the world will be able to produce all the pharmaceutical substances only at home, especially our small country, so there is more direction. e part of the substance themselves

diversification of suppliers. uh, well, well-established logistical connections work this way, and the materials that are used for production, that is, glass paper foil. we try to develop our own production facilities to the maximum and use our own suppliers or equipment suppliers from friendly countries. this is a harder topic that is, after all, the market is a very narrow consumer, there are very few, respectively, there are very few manufacturers of this equipment, because there is not enough market, respectively, these are several countries, including china , germany there, south korea. well, respectively, we buy the best samples for our plant. here's the thing about exports. how much do we sell a-a abroad today, and who is the witness of their buyers? ah, the main consumer? er, that is. well, this turns out to be the traditional market of the russian federation and the cis countries in general. and the so-called far

we work. uh, diversification. successfully, which countries we have already discovered and whether we plan to expand our horizons even further, this task is definitely worth it. it's just that again here we are faced somewhere. hmm, i would say with the protectionist policy of other states. that is, how do we give birth to ourselves? yes , as we develop import substitution, such import substitution is also developing in other countries and , accordingly, it can probably be said that in those countries where their own pharmaceutical industry is actively developed. uh, well, we don't even we are trying to enter, because the competition will be excessive, respectively. we choose those countries where there is such a large market that there will be a place for belarusian manufacturers, or these are countries where it is not very developed. these people do everything to make our life comfortable. these young lilac seedlings,

which will grow and will soon go to the territory of cities and towns of our republic, give us a plus in this regard, what to receive ornamental plants. they work every day, tirelessly already driving up to the place of work. i always blow what will be the meeting. what questions will be solved, some link will be missed, the educational process, it will function, as we would like to create a creative environment, we offer to spend 1 day with specialists and learn

. everything is good, so that it means that life was not lived in vain, watch on belarus 24 tv channel. our ancestors’ products are real male craft cooperage of potato pancakes , it’s not for nothing that we are called bulbash. myths and legends nearby popular culture in all its glory watch every week the project of fashion for culture on belarus 24 tv channel. belarus 24

tv channel broadcasts for you around the clock, do not switch. our daily task is to tell about belarus to the country and abroad. more than 100 million viewers around the world have access to the projects of our tv channel. so what is it like, belarus business and developing and festival

we tell you not only about significant events, we introduce you to active, energetic and inspiring people who

live in belarus and do everything for its development, belarus can be different in order to understand and feel. she needs to be seen with her own eyes. hello dear viewers on the air of belarus 24 tv channel. see us every day witches do, belarus is closer. hello a lot. what has accumulated of world significance will often be dealt with. so we start globally. however, today we will break the format, we will start today with us absolutely clearly and

understandably pressure, perhaps one of the most resonant fragments of the personnel day for presidents monday. charged a-a leader, and secondly, showed all the decisiveness in response to any pressure from the outside , i listen to some there. ukrainian polish or finnish owners people remain technologies remain in production, there are electrodes needed. why is your president on the job? uh, the issue of a change of ownership is now being resolved. and i think that next year he will start to work gone. goodbye. we don't know you. you don't want to know us. the owner has been nationalized since that moment. what change of ownership and how will we solve

the issue of the government for half a year it is considered that this enterprise is yours gone? wave to them to cross that they have left you property. what is this? well, igor petrush. well, i told you, for example, and mcdonald 's said it worked and works, and people come and produce normal products. but the americans or whoever the kazakhs did not want this enterprise of ours? russia does not work. well, as you wish, our people are not stupider, so that, as i said, cut this bun and shove it there lettuce or a piece sausages, because everything is already left here, and they didn’t take anything with them. but if they took it, then i would take off their heads, respectively, people, no one should take anything away. you must not allow this. well, we talked about the answer in your area. ikea ah ikea well

goodbye! yes, we made these stools, uh, chairs and others, which we cannot do, moreover , if we didn’t take anything away and the people stayed, the owner left. well go fair on the sly in terms of justice injustice. here, of course, the question is very deep and multi-layered, because we are talking about economic components, first of all, we provided conditions for the work of foreign investors to the owners. and today. for political reasons, they leave enterprises and leave us with problems - this is that people do not work, our people who live in the regions, and here is the delay in this process . exclusively from moreover, to create rights.

incident for belarus to show some new practice of how these issues can be resolved, and for political reasons i am absolutely. e, i agree with the approach that it needs to be dosed somehow either by the economy or by politics, when we start to mix things up, then all parties suffer, so i would approach this. so far, this is the only way, i would say, this is how the first president protects the national interests of the country, the national interests of our economy. including, the second from the point of view of legal e, the parliament, will accept any bills. i am talking now about it openly, which will be legally fixed. this is the third. i would like this meeting with the president to be broadcast in all russian media. why is it that the president, when he says not to take not a nail, not to withdraw nothing from what has been done here technology was brought to belarus? why did belarus create some conditions for investors to work quietly here? did belarus not provide all the conditions for

foreign enterprises to develop? is it true, the third point, why do they leave, because the conditions do not make them leave. this is another truth and forced to leave. this means that this is purely politics, the fourth point is international law. that is, if we are talking about legal issues, why do i say that in russia they watched this meeting and did what our president does. i watch, sometimes russian news and i'm surprised guys there is a war with you. everything, in fact, they are taken away on the territory of europe and america, your these oligarchs will strip you into underpants. this means that the company's accounts are being frozen. and you are sitting more speak here is some french company leaving. let's agree. let's make some conditions. what conditions, if wanted, the west they and swift switched off today all the red lines passed. why isn't swift disabled? and they are afraid of me by those who say that we are scary to scare away invest why they are not in the fact that we will never change.

legislation on invest about investors a conscientious investor, how he worked here and will work moreover, look at the statistics. since the beginning of the year. first your. at the beginning of all these events, investors, how belarus was going, the question is where they are coming from today, they are not coming from europe today. they go near 100 central asia means asian market, china and that's great. but one more thing let's be honest. let's say. remember the statement of one lithuanian official who is extremely concerned that a businessman or lithuanian europeans are doing everything to circumvent the sanctions imposed by the european union and enter the russian belarusian market. here's the truth the truth is that european investors and does not want to go anywhere with runaway investors. it 's not about the economy. it's about politics when they leave our national interests. we have an obligation to defend ourselves. this time and the second our actions would be even more effective if russia and all countries after the soviet space. let him see that the

only way is to hear it like that. this is sergei now on the other side. why are there no international precedents? it seems to me that after our skies were closed without trial or investigation, and icao still produces some reports of its own. and we have all airspace has already been shut down . it seems to me that after that we received a green corridor for any solutions to protect the national kiev regime actually stole property, and there property worth millions of dollars in the form of wagons of those kits that were supposed to be assembled into buses, electric buses, trolleybuses and such precedents can be and in lithuania show our terminal in klaipeck. porta has enough of them. i'd like to emphasize here a little, uh, one more thing. now, if we compare russia belarus look at the russian federation made a bet in the 1900s on a foreign investor and, in fact, foreign investors. took control.

and the plant in tolyatti kamaz, other things, when they left for political reasons, everyone is well aware of the political ones. the russian federation has lost these competencies when we talk about the form of ownership and when strategic industries are in state form. property. it is clear that these investors are not strategic ones. then we're talking about economic sovereignty of our state. we saw this, if we did not have such an economic basis as the mass of the mtz of our huge industry, then here it is. imagine if they belonged to someone abroad, and they would leave, so that we would do it, and remember at one time there was this pursuit to increase the share of small and medium-sized businesses, and, uh, for some reason it was proposed not to do it in parallel with the development of a large city-forming city. uh, there is a set of enterprises, and it is to harness large enterprises. we'll take it out now. there outside the city do not understand that these strikes were actually offered. this sale of large

large enterprises to bet on the so -called small medium business. here, it is probably important to indicate, including for those of our viewers who may be watching us abroad, that we are not trying to name the platform now, that now any foreign enterprise will be nationalizing a speech that for belarus - this story is exceptional and forced, given that there was once a credibility, those enterprises that were allowed to go to these sites and now the state has obligations to the population that works, when these investors came, and let me remind you, the president set up a dacha, and so that these enterprises were, for the sovereignty of the republic of belarus, they did not oppose the republic of belarus and b so that the enterprises were social oriented. we are a social state, what we see here is an enterprise, or rather, the owners of these enterprises turned out to be politically biased for the second moment. they, uh, abandoned their social obligations. that is, two basic

they violated the conditions with which they came to the republic of belarus, uh, but we also see the relations of our country. that is, we do not liquidate these enterprises, we do not destroy jobs. this is not the first time, a necessary measure. let's remember a communal apartment in the early 1990s, when some owner somehow got this communal apartment back in the early nineties. there, in the ninety- second year, he left for the united states of america . then he simply exploited this enterprise, bringing it to a slightly semi-bankrupt foreign state, this is such a type of sanction, which the west is trying to use us completely so we thus respond to the sanction, but i want one small moment. remember the average dream of any entrepreneur in belarus or russia, this is a must when you open an account abroad to buy. there is some real estate and part of their assets to transfer there. unfortunately it's true. now what is the plus, and in this way we have been feeding europe all the well-being of europe for 30 years

. and so now it is over. now. i think every entrepreneur in the country, and we must support them and will support must understand, finally, that the only way to save your money. the only way to become successful is to develop your own country. and god forbid that in russia it was heard, of course, there is. i would look at this issue even more broadly, not only in terms of national security policy. we now see an attempt within the framework of a hybrid war, using both politics and economics and information pressure, to defeat the country, given that nuclear powers cannot use nuclear weapons ; the potential is too great and everything threatens a complete catastrophe. no less effective measures of destruction are now being applied. e of the opposing state. it's right here. uh, economic such kind of sabotage. look what happens in the russian federation . not a single one of his own ball bearings

, his name is, the production of ball bearings has stopped, like a trifle in moscow there were only two factories and now not a single one because of this, not cars, not planes, not tanks, not everything else, and they thank the belarusians, what they kept our state-owned bearing plant in minsk. although there were proposals from ivan for the prospect of closing, because there are swedish german chinese bearings. and now it turned out that when there was opposition on the verge of military action, that these are the factories that have been preserved in our country. they now play a strategic role. not only for our state, for the entire union state. let's go further in this, continuing the theme of the development of sovereignty, we saw a big meeting of the president the day before. development of sovereignty. in this case by creating such foundations of the state. uh, the belarusians updated the constitution by a referendum and, accordingly, this is quite serious, and

fundamental changes have occurred in certain articles and directions, and accordingly, it is necessary to adapt the legislation to approach this reasonably on the eve of two, probably the most important issues were all the belarusian people's assembly and political parties. long time. so we saw that there was an attempt to find an image. this is what will happen. this updated status of the federal tax service, on the one hand, is not a new phenomenon for us, but the renewed presidents clearly said, it will be the stabilizer of the society. and this is its main role. if the need arises, then it will be on its site that it will be necessary to negotiate, and the second point, including meetings, is the president, when he visited, labor collectives there, people periodically, when she came in, and this topic and they asked, and who will in this in the national assembly that's why it's about us that the president answered. and the question is who will be included in the vns? let's listen now to the composition of the vns. representatives of all strata of the belarusian society will enter. and this the main thing. well, i noticed that some labor

collectives raised the question. but how is it that there will not be another meeting of officials, and so on, how labor collectives will be represented. well, maybe you didn’t get through to people, didn’t explain to them, but representatives of labor collectives will have a percentage there. only the ways of movement to this meeting are somewhat different, not directly gathered. the plant nominated its representative, and he is represented in the all-belarusian people's assembly by deputies from the party of public organizations. everybody there will be people. and this is labor collectives. these are teachers. this is the worker - these are the peasants - these are the doctors and so on. but they must be professionals. these are not wedding generals who came and sat. whoever understood something, didn’t understand something, served time, left, there shouldn’t

be such people there, and we must do everything so that the delegates, returning to their workplaces, report to the labor collectives on the issues that were considered at the all-belarusian people’s assembly. we will do it in the best way, despite the fact that in the composition of the national assembly will be respected people. it cannot interfere with the activities of other organs. to replace them, to perform their functions, the entire belarusian people's assembly, in fact, should be preserved as a political institution. they develop into some kind of bureaucratic body. everything is laid out very clearly. that is, we are now waiting for the parliamentarians to finally approve everything, yes, how are you? you see, this is the process that the belarusians are now conducting and pretending. well, vns is a response to a request from society, and this request is that the horizontal

communication. it should become the basis of this broad representation - this is ownership in the general population and responsibility. it seems to me that the latter is such mobility that appears in a person. he understands how he, maybe that's some kind of horizontal. yes, move around. yes, because , uh, when we talk about the vertical, uh, we mean what alexander grigoryevich said, these are officials, and so that it does not turn. here in the assembly of officials here is really something, but it is precisely a broad representation and the most important thing is a responsibility. although, it is not very rare for us to hear this word. more. we're talking about representation rather than responsibility. in fact, responsibility must be put here in the first place, when e people are involved in making any decisions, they should get used to taking responsibility, not to say what is bad, but to offer, how to do better and take responsibility? i would consider it that way. i would like to make two points. the first president thinks not only about

what is now because here i am now i will go to the regions, people, on the contrary, ask a question. listen, what kind of democracy is there. what are you doing there, in general, sometimes they ask such a situation like this. let our father take everything with his hands completely from beginning to end. and in general, so that everyone just sits and performs. and this, in principle, will cause an absolutely normal reaction in people now, but at the same time i want people to hear. we are democracy, in fact, we are developing these bills that the president spoke yesterday - these are people in power, but what does the president think about, as i see it, he thinks that in 10-15-20 years, so that the fate of belarus would never be decided on the street, political issues would never be resolved with the help of a baton stick confrontation. e some political groups of groupers. to do this, we introduced this entire belarusian assembly , moreover, this is a people's body after the referendum, because we can be proud of the people's constitution. remember how we received it, it is truly folk. it was supported by the absolute majority of belarusians and the absolute majority of belarusians, they said that all

the belarusian people's assembly should be and today the president summed up the discussion definitively, what is most important, there will be no loosening of the balance and power. there is a parliament - this is the legislative power. there is a president of the council of ministers. the vertical is the executive branch. what is the whole russian assembly, therefore, a strategic political body that will not interfere with the activities of, for example, the liberal democratic party, but i will watch its decisions as the leader of the party, because the people decided, and within the framework of these decisions with the communists . let's argue like here we are by the way, we are talking about sports. yes, more about political parties. most importantly, the president said that the entire belarusian people's assembly is responsible for the function. that's it. uh, recognition of the legitimacy of the system and the right of succession. that's when we say stabilizer. this is our response practically to the maidan. let's speak directly to us, they wanted to in the twentieth year. to do the ukrainian scenario here, they have this negativity scenario, that is, lawlessness

, chaos, anarchy, riots, coup d'état. we offer a system that will stabilize and be responsible for legitimacy. and what is legitimacy in jurisprudence in political science is illegality, that is, legality, compliance with the procedure. and this is the perception of a person by society, that the power is generally recognized, that its decision must be carried out. this is a very subtle psychological moment, and here the entire belarusian people's assembly will play a role and the second moment. this is the right of succession, why they were talking about 10-15 years, so that someone would not suddenly come to some incomprehensible person, and would not start to break everything. eh, let's talk straight in young states. this often happens and you will see how to act on it in germa not. yes, there quickly everyone who suddenly thought there, somewhere on the internet, will immediately

be found and imprisoned. we also need to have healthy authorities, and the president. let's be honest, the founding father of a sovereign independent new belarus, that's the one that we have been living for 30 years. uh, so that this one, as i call him collective lukashenka, he continues to exist after lukashenka yes. yes, this is the analogy i have. i think about it all the time. so, when we were choosing a place for atomic medicines, we were looking for a geological plate that was large and immobile to an earthquake. here i have such an association that the entire belarusian people's assembly is that same slab that is strong, not subject to earthquakes, which are at the heart of the state. after all , we know that hierarchical systems are vertically vertical systems. they are subject to destruction in due time. the collapse of the monarchy, we remember the collapse of the soviet union, where there was also a vertical and it is necessary to build a

system that would rely on the people's representation and regardless of incidents that may occur in the power vertical. if we simply say that the vertical is always, to one degree or another, about the elite. and here is the horizontal one. the history of the vns is about the very thing, if it is a nationality. yes, the second topic, which was discussed is closely related to the federal tax service , is political parties. that's where it sounded clearly in the political field and the president said. uh, in my political field of the country , only those parties should work, whose activities correspond to the basic principles domestic and foreign policy to act from the citizens. and i, alexander sergeevich , suggests that some of the opponents are already writing in this vein, trying to search here. what yeah. this means a green corridor is being created, exclusively for pro-government parties. well , in short, a person who will read. this is careful. he understands that there is no pro-government correspondence to domestic foreign policy - this is patriotism, but it does not

determine whether a liberal democrat is a socialist or a communist. yes, but how do you see it for yourself? why are those wrong who is trying to distort. this i will tell you. so there are no people from a country where everyone has the same opinion, it's true. and that's what political parties are for. they can be criticized and should be criticized that they are not perfect. but a person can express his point of view, or legal politics, or on the street god forbid the street, only legal political way. further, that the street, too, may be legal. if it is framed accordingly, we are talking about the street, when, uh, chaos and destruction, so now it goes further. did someone say or new law or the president yesterday at a meeting said that you can not criticize criticize you can have a different point of view, you can not oppose an empty state. this means giving in against the people, which we are now talking about once and there is in some country of the world that teach all democracies allow the existence of political parties that will come out and say i am against the existing

constitution we want to destroy everything and start acting. let me give you a simple example first. can a country exist a party that strongly opposes the state symbols under which we live and which has been accepted by the whole people. and we had such parties, but they still have not been liquidated. no. is it possible to be a party that speaks openly. we will completely change the geopolitical vector of the country's development, we will destroy all ties, therefore i translate and explain to criticize, it is possible and necessary to argue this development of the country, but within the framework of the constitution and above all of us , the russian assembly will stand in itself. like this one a slab where we will know that the people of the vsevolozhsk assembly determined the course such and such, and we will argue how to come to these decisions, how to make people live better, so that health care is better educated the economy, but the country is not destroyed and this normal civilized way. uh, we will pass the law on political parties in the near future in parliament yesterday, after it

will go to parliament now. we will discuss it. there will be another discussion, and in the end, all this will strengthen our state. that is, i am convinced of this, he says, in fact, we we see, if we look at the oldest, probably such a party system, political great britain, then we will see the conservatives and the laborites there. and they fight hard with each other. we see this, they have a culture of behavior in parliament in general. completely wild for us, but it has developed historically in relation to culture. it’s not chaos, it’s happening there even though they seem to be radically different, while both of them are patriots, both of them know the limits, beyond which they will be considered traitors to the motherland and will work against them relevant legislation. that is, such a mechanism is proposed now. well, yes, of course, i absolutely agree with you that this exists in all countries. eh, we really need a dialogue between the parties, probably, at some acute moments we need strategic sports, but uh, this is what we are doing

, it seems to me, this is, uh, such a belarusian experience to teach parties to talk to each other, because that we do not have much experience in party building. and uh parties ain't too popular with the populace and it will be quite difficult to explain which party to choose, because they will have to learn how to talk not only among themselves, but also from the population to make ordinary advertising to attract to themselves. e voters party members. this is such a very complex mechanism. a and e vns. uh, i think yes, this will be the platform that will allow. e, to unite all these multidirectional currents, but, and the e parties should not rely only on the navy, they should. create their own political culture , their own political field in which they will working in the national assembly is not proportions. it 's a little. this is a little different, we should have two two platforms. these are political

parties. it's uh, vns. eh, and eh, vns. still, this is not an answer. and on some external pressure, this is what we were going for. we had it for a long time from the very beginning and we are just completing this process today, and not starting it. let's continue. he has a few more important topics to discuss. i think that one way or another, because we have already touched upon, we will continue to talk about sovereignty. this is indeed one of the main features of the state. we see that today hail has been knocked down all the time, just these days there is a powerful surge of tension around serbia cosmos president vučić called the night of december 12 the most difficult night in his life, the aggravation began after the prime minister's collection, divulged by the republic of kosovo announced that the nato contingent would remove the roads in the north. barricades built by the kostov. serbs, that is, he actually put forward an ultimatum if the serbs are not dispersed by nato, then everything is in business, the local police will come. vučić held an emergency meeting of the security council and accused the united states and, above all, of non-compliance with the agreements reached earlier

on the war, germany considers serbia's plans to ask nato to deploy its armed forces in kosovo unacceptable. this is a statement by the head of the german foreign ministry berberg, it is noteworthy that a new round of tension happened literally a week after the historical one. as its participants themselves called the eu, the western balkans in a tyrant. and now borisovich himself what kind of partners turned out to be a week ago. they patted the student on the shoulder and spoke. there is the balkans, we are one family here, and today this is it. well, everything, the fact is that the balkans are full of contradictions even between fraternal countries that have one language, one religion, and they are even ethnically the same. take the serbs, take the croats, take the montenegrins. you see, it means that montenegro was the last to break away from serbia. before that, there were slovenia and croatia, the contradictions

are great. and these contradictions are played by the countries of the west, which do not want a stable coalition of slavic countries to form, er, which allied russia of the pre-war confrontation. here it comes now. well i think that learn understands that from a military point of view. uh, serbia can't oppose a bloc with nato, and considering that the largest military base of the united states is located on the territory of kosovo, uh, that means u eastern europe, i think that, of course, the matter of pre-war actions will not come to fruition. unless there's some kind of spontaneous wildfire. understandably interesting americans. everything is clear here. already about it they said one base is worth what? and besides moreover, here this factor of destabilization in the european union, well, why do europeans need it? it would seem unnecessary, but we eat burbock. we see a barrel, which is clearly on the side. here in this conflict, on the side of the brishnah, they also undermine little ukraine and little

tension. turkey greece with small grants, they need to blow up the balkans more, which means they will sink faster than food. i just want to say that we are somewhat, perhaps misleadingly, wrongly placing shares, please, all this policy is determined by the united states of america. everything is just everything. these politicians are obviously driven by what i think at all. these policies have compromising evidence of the united states, see the statement of mother merkel who in general, according to such statements, mother to whom the stepmother after such statements, you know a political career, there are experts who believe that compromising evidence has about merkel's connections with the stasi, which allows the united states of america to manipulate her . and this is her and the statement that the minsk agreements were just a gain in time to strengthen, e, the army of ukraine is a demonstration for russia that in

europe it is impossible to negotiate with anyone , it was only worth the macron to declare with the united states that he was ready to negotiate there, we would ensure the interests of russia, it was worth schwaltz. there is someone else, as a statement immediately followed, which was supposed to show putin that there are no people in europe , there are no people in europe with whom we must understand the server is in a very difficult situation, that is, and they have extremely limited maneuver for for action. remember them imposed sanctions against belarus. they didn’t want to, in relation to russia, they didn’t introduce it yet , they forced them to introduce it in relation to belarus. we understand very well, although by and large they should remember how lukashenka flew there in 1999. i remember under the bombardments. i remember remember, and so we are somewhere, despite the fact that this decision was unpleasant. well, we understand, but the second point is that you are asking whether there will be a military confrontation or there will be no fight. why such statements does fought upholds interests of europe, all his statements over the past year, they are destroying the european

union, and this, among other things, if the americans need a military conflict, it will be and they will keep this conflict smoldering on purpose, for which the worst thing for them is a strong powerful europe without splits, which can really become a competitor for the us im. it is not necessary. ukraine will start to lose even more. they understand that ukraine will lose ukraine will never win this conflict. what else do they have? they have more transnistria moldova you can play there, you can play in central asia, they will try around russia, but in europe itself , why should there be peace in kosovo and serbia, why do they need it? they have created this conflict all your life. uh, how it all started, who destroyed yugoslavia, who split it, and who controls kosovo, who forced it to recognize and create an international precedent, who all the business corporations finance there, who owns the cellular communications in coconut, the americans own everything american, therefore, if they will need it they won't do it. but if europe was

truly independent, if germany really wanted to be the leader of the european union today, the world would have to expel the americans to sit down at the negotiating table and agree on something completely different. history. europe was. i would not agree here that the european union is acting purely on behalf of the americans here, why? because let me remind you that it was not america that began to destroy yugoslavia, but in general the first geopolitical operation of the frg generalshar, croatia, slovenia and the european union became the task is to include serbia in the composition until the age of 25 . and the conditions for this inclusion is the recognition of kosovo as independent. as you can admit, now there is a strong pressure on the time when russia is diverted to a special military operation. the second moment, a gas pipeline from turkey passes through serbia, which supplies gas to hungary and

europe . poland, the flow of the gas pipeline, which must also be stopped and a small armed conflict with rupture of this gas pipeline. that's all, maybe . e, i think that here we are now reaping our strategic union state and russia in the zero years, when we were obviously mistaken by the west, because serbia then asked for a union state and its dkb. she was also an observer to the eurasian union. it could have been included, but we did not offer her a roadmap for integration at the moment when it was possible , unfortunately we have one. we read messages from mikusova will officially submit an application for membership in the european union are trying to use the application and already e the status of a candidate for eu membership received bosnia herzegovina with the problems that were and on which the word

claims turkish influence in the region. and olguine. we touched upon the topic, indeed merkel yes, we saw this revelation when she said that, in fact, the minsk agreements were a screen, everyone already understood that this is absolutely fake. we saw their faces, which then in the palace of independence we saw real achievements, which were in the end. do you think she ever she admits that, among other things, it will forever remain on her conscience that they did not finish these minsk agreements in order to prevent what we are now seeing, for example, in ukraine merkel’s position, she caused a mixed reaction not only from us but also in the west. here, i would pay more attention to this and, uh, in austria, a very noisy statement has already followed. yes, look, it means these austrian chancellor hein with christian fine speaking, moreover, at the round table, which is dedicated to ukraine, he said that it scares some frankness frau. merkel talks

about it. thus. we destroy any basis for trust. and yes, that's why, as it were, the reaction from europe is more important. uh, does mrs. merkel ever admit what she meant by these words ? well, i think that, of course, it will happen. although it will be such a difficult moment. we must understand what she is saying. this is in the conditions of an island of crisis that is taking place in relations with russia and it is largely connected, but the common european position, in addition, there is a lot of pressure on her. in connection with the fact that it was she who pushed through, as they call it now, gas. uh, these contracts, and so she is forced, of course, to talk about her specific political line. and so with such luggage, surely she has for the number of years that she spent in power in germany, the largest state of the european union, if there are many

positive moments and the support of the population. even this does not allow her to be immune from pressure, so it turns out. well of course i think that today all european politicians are under such severe pressure. i would not speak about the pressure of aggression and about what all of them, even the former, should express, but a certain position in relation to russia, and to the conflict that is taking place. well, i think there is still a moment and responsibility, which will come later. i think that each of them, uh, thinks very seriously about the fact that the conflict will ever end, how it will end lays some bricks of how it will be explained in the future, that merkel has dramatically changed her position, because she is over. for only 22 years, this one has been criticized for being very gentle and beautifully advocating dialogue. and then

abruptly. she retired, afraid that she would be taken away, would have been silent, would have been a heroine in the west. uh, there is such a culture of censure, the so-called line, and it is very effective today. this is the most powerful psychological pressure that matters. than can be, yes, some more important confession of the reasons for merkel's behavior like this this is the strongest information fund. they are really under a lot of pressure right now, but briefly merkel not only deceived all the jews, everything throughout her time as a castrir contradicts what she said, she and the gas agreements. pushed ideologues and was much. sincerely, when they forgot about merkel, let her justify herself to her citizens before history later, but what about the coup d'etat in germany? same in general, some just i apologize for the expression. here is the circus. uh, here's the scholz ordered. here's to someone that he had his ratings it took that there will be more and more such coups d'etat in europe now. yes, it means

that against the backdrop of growing protests, the dissatisfaction of the german population of the european union, the economic situation, the political situation. it is necessary in some way to return people to the fold, loyalty, or at least fear, therefore, a set of measures is underway, the first intimidation of a nuclear war, it is not russia to raise this topic in belarus with a nuclear threat. tomorrow the war will strike tomorrow so that the europeans will sit hungry and cold, lord, okay, here , the second one they want to destroy our country with a coup. tomorrow the nazis will come to power . salo, who is rewritten there on the net. what kind of coup is funny to watch, it 's like a serious policy, but in the information media, because the world is ruled by information, uh, the media is power. now in europe there is one lie every day and a person wakes up and frightens him. yesterday, the coup was prevented and the fascists were detained. they are you shot nuclear war. maybe tomorrow the next one will start, which is what scares me. putin

has something else in mind. tomorrow it will still lose weight , sit and get lost, which means, but they put pressure on the opposition in the form of an alternative for germany. they strengthened the police presence in the cities ; why did it have to be beneficial to call the entire ruling european power whatever you want. i would be here in this side dish, which, as it were, we were served two moment i saw this power outage, which, as it were, the main one of the main reasons was also called the terrorist threat. history is warm. yes, this is something that is connected with reality, and not heinrich there, some thirteenth seventy-year-old yes belykh 13 will now answer for everything today. uh,

energy crisis issues. it is one of the sharpest and it is obvious that winter is coming. and, as it were, this whole informational agenda, it is very much condensed, so it will be necessary and now it is clear that it is necessary to take tougher measures, but since the state is super-democratic, it is necessary to give some kind of democratic settings so that people understand. uh, why is this happening, but i have more more scares. this is a realistic threat, because its introduction is already at the first stage. when the proceedings have not yet taken place, it means that there will be a very strict centralization of power. and if we are talking about belarus then, i would not see any danger here. and when we talk about germany and that power begins to concentrate, then i would see a very alarming bell here. he immediately throws us back in the thirties, when these processes, they already took place twice in germany and. uh, even in the middle ages, germany needed to be dispersed here so that it did not pose a danger. i want to continue the

thought that came up here comparing e with germany in the thirties. the point is that historical analogies arise. remember from the reichstag jock. and here is an attempt to destroy the bundestag and kidnap the chancellor. for what it was doing, coming democratically to power. hitler decided to completely clear the political field to destroy the positional party that could interfere with him, so the largest political party in germany, the communist party, was almost completely destroyed due to the arson of the restag. here we beg an analogy, but here the non-communist party opponents, the ruling alternative for germany, it is clear that here this alternative will not be the way to go. yes, in order to destroy the alternative and many say fascisization is happening fascisization germany, and obviously we are witnesses of this process, are two more important topics. we need

time to discuss. we are continuing another important topic, the topic of geopolitical appetites for our western neighbor. warsaw, a lot is now being written on this subject of various materials, but, probably, most, succinctly. this is still a statement by the head of the russian foreign intelligence service, sergei naryshkin , who said, let me remind you, warsaw is speeding up preparations for the annexation of western ukrainian lands, the territory of lviv ivan frankivska and most of the ternopil region of ukraine this correlates with poland's strategy for the 21st century. here. let's now listen to the chairman of the euro-atlantic association in poland , mark nowakowski. this person believes that the strategic goal of poland is to oust russia into asia by expelling it from the club, superpowers, and on the way to this goal there is another one to cut off russia from the shortest transit route to europe , that is, to wrest it from the union state.

whom? in your telegram channel, you have detailed the republic of belarus, piotr, both the context of this statement and the possible consequences. share your thoughts, please. here, when novakovsky's zhemarkok, this is not some kind of marginal. this is the head of one of the central thought factories that organized expert support for poland's accession to the eu and nato; today he interacts at an expert level with the e-e of nato and the european union on the so-called euro-atlantic e, solidarity and so he actually recognizes poland as a proxy for the power of the collective west and see it as a national interest more. what a national interest it is scary to voice, but for they are important. here is the zone of contact with the eurasian union as an allied state - this is to move to the east, and for belarus and ukraine ukraine to be at war with russia poland and poland

to receive everything from this. uh, the most delicious dividends, that is, cheap labor. uh, markets and in fact. uh, the puppet government and states on this account they finance marovets recently said this and admitted the same tikhonovskaya of the same fugitives and others, and so on, because in addition to the theoretical base, if practically steps on on the eve of this account, the ministry of internal affairs of belarus reported that they received information about the creation of a paramilitary extremist formation in poland and lithuania. that is, the unification is already underway, and, the commonwealth violation, the structural divisions of the weapons included in it, their goal is the organization of encroachments on the territorial integrity of sovereignty, the basis of the constitutional order of public security of the republic of belarus and the day before. we have seen both in social networks. i think our viewers have already seen the statement. here is an interview again and again, when these fighters here these detachments of england say, ukraine for us, we are warming up. we're warming up here. and then we

go to belarus, so they did not hide this in the twentieth year, the density of such statements is becoming more and more to talk about, what about the fact that the money allocated by polish instructors, uh, are preparing specific saboteurs, extremists and terrorists. this is also recognized by polish experts. e, the head of the polish geopolitical society, the kola pro. this has been said for a long time, that is, poland is preparing to destabilize the situation in belarus expanding the war zone to our territory. here is their task. they created the entire infrastructure for this. unfortunately, and they want this to be the reason for this. we have to talk about the reasons. here, uh, the plan that the head of russian intelligence said. here's what we need to understand. the first annexation of ukraine is already underway. and today ukraine is already dividing it, what it owns, it has nothing for me. she, if before the beginning of her life

, she had such, you know, at least elementary remnants of sovereignty and property, but then today they have to give what they have not yet given away within 100 years, and children and grandchildren will no longer give up, and western ukraine is already quietly buying up and belongs to non-ukrainians for a long time, as far as we are concerned. the most important thing in this regard is that without us, without belarus , it is impossible to implement the plans of poland and the west in general, in this context, the weakening and destruction of russia is impossible, and no one will leave us behind. not in the twenty- fourth, not in the twenty-fifth. not in the thirtieth. we must forget these illusions. if now someone will say everything is fine. it all ended there. it didn’t end lukashenka every day, he says at every meeting that nothing has ended others have said this. he did not say souss president. it sounds quite

different, that he is well aware of the plans of the west in the twentieth year, which means op, uh, the destruction of belarus and attacks on the russian federation, unleashing a war, if if the special operation had not started, the president said about this, now my friends are returning to the twentieth year, which someone may be tired of discussing. well, no one knows yet that in the twentieth year. if to be here, god forbid , a coup d'état began. if there was a war, only for this we are needed for the war with russia, as they did ukraine, the poor, this unfortunate ukrainian people for the war, and the belarusian people would be used for the war against their will for the war, and only for the war it cannot be otherwise, therefore, one conclusion no one will be left behind. no one will be left behind, theoretically, units will be introduced here. that's what you think, the offensive of a regiment of some kind will go wrong, it's all done. there will be a return here to the territory of belarus of our citizens who were recruited. they will intrude into everyday life. then there are

terrorist attacks that will go around the country, undermining, destabilizing the situation, the unfinished will pop up, the fifth column, the political one, which will suddenly say we are going to the polls. we changed our minds, we 're going to fight, that is, that's it for everything we must be prepared for war starts in the 21st century. it’s a little different on june 22 from the bomber. yes, this is more, well, we have slightly erased the word hybrid war. and in general, the main meaning of this concept, as nato ideologists explain. all this dirty work on the territory of the state should be carried out by the citizens of these countries, that is, with the support of financial instructor ideological economy. that is, now we are in a state of a certain phase. the hybrid war against belarus is, first of all, an economic war. this is a political war, but

the next phase is a proxy war, that is, an attempt by the hands of those people who are announced by the armed belarusian opposition to break through the belarusian border here to organize a kind of window. it sounds like a malorita that the seizure of the regional center by these armed oppositionists and through this window on the territory of belarus a stream of pmc fighters of pmc volunteers of various kinds of vacationers of the polish army should gush. and in general, any trash from all over the world is an attempt to unleash a civil conflict, usually behind a civil conflict, foreign military intervention and in fact, that’s why our president called for the deployment of a regional grouping of troops here as a precautionary measure, but sergey correctly said that given our most important geopolitical position, the fact that belarus practically holds the

heart of russia in its hands is moscow’s central industrial region. and if this territory is occupied. to put it bluntly, minato’s troops would then keep moscow and protect it from a blow, and conventional and weapons of mass destruction would be almost impossible, it would be possible to dictate any conditions to moscow. i am i believe that poland is still only making a claim to the status of a great power and does not really have the capabilities that will allow her to carry out an annexation. there is a good expression about annexation. do not rush. and it ’s like we’ll see ahead, but it seems to me that we are more a little overestimating and underestimating ourselves, and on the agenda, in the informational one, we are somehow connecting ourselves. e with russia and, e, the value of belarus for poland in itself. she's kind of bogged down. it seems to me that the steps of poland that she is undertaking to strengthen its defense ability. they are connected not only with the

russian federation but also with the strengthening of belarus itself. and i also think that the poles are not so unambiguous about the potential of belarus, including their political one, and those statements that it makes about raising rates are connected precisely with this. i would also watch it this way, because time moves on. here the right us 100 years will be remembered for 100 years. and now we have to prepare like this, if suddenly they just have something in the head of this stupid polish elite will arise. remember 100 years you will remember that you climbed into belarus like your ancestors , nothing will happen. er, still. i would like to get out of this very dense discussion to some kind of you know such vectors. what is the fairway, what should be the focus of attention, and our society. so we started by saying that there is a global understanding of ourselves in the state. yes, because the improvement of the constitution this is democracy in the form of an updated vns. but politically.