that's right, yes, i won't dissemble, because it's , uh, really, when you conduct such cases, and you look from all sides, that how can you present that evidence so that the court hears from you and makes a decision in your favor, well , interesting. you have already said that you are capable of doing the same thing for quite a long time, but there are cases when a lawyer is simple. well, everything, well, i have to convey some reasons for the circumstances. uh, here's a case for another lawyer. how well can it provide the client help. here is the second lawyer absolutely qualitatively, she is here there is no such comparison. probably they will be wrong every one of uh, lawyers. i mean, he does a really good job. and this transmission here, well, due to some life circumstances, it is clear that a lawyer is the same person as everyone else, because of an illness, he can leave to be on vacation, and with us. well, let's say how i work with colleagues, and go to this one. i ask my colleague, and you pick up this

or that case, but immerse yourself in this case. is it a long process or something like this the case itself, there are different claims. well, let's just say, right , uh, there are complex categories, uh, of civil cases, and there it really requires some kind of long-term study. well, more simple ones are not so complicated. let's put it another way, and some require study, including there it will be necessary to really go to the circuit to study inheritance cases, each case is, well, it is different and with this in mind , there are correspondingly different decisions, so any lawyer. even after being led by his colleague. this matter will unequivocally and study the case and talk with the client. and if necessary, it needs some additional information. that is, therefore, here, well, somehow to say that if another lawyer came, he would not have time to dive. no, you can't say that a lawyer. in any case, will dive into the case. but what are your reasons? you refuse us or

shift cases to colleagues only if we have such a concept, it happens like overlays in lawsuits, but for the most part, i, uh, refuse in rare cases, if i had a vacation planned, i can get sick and i'm sorry family and child. can get sick only in such. and so we try every lawyer. well , including me in the first place. i speak for myself, and i try, of course, to bring each case to its logical conclusion, we understand that you are protected by attorney-client secrecy , but maybe you were faced with the fact that you once needed legal services. and if so, where did you apply, in general, do lawyers have a practice of consulting each other? and this is consent client, firstly, that is, yes, we can, without revealing attorney-client privilege, consult on a case, it is clear that we have codes and a decision of a prisoner by the supreme court, there is such a thing as judicial practice and very often you

talk to colleagues, who had what cases? what are the solutions for these or other stated claims. so i can say, um. hmm, lawyers are people too. they also get divorced. yes, and i can tell you that what they are and most of the lawyers now resort. e to the help of their legal colleagues, because, well, including divorce or a division of property. uh, the baby argument is yours. this is already a personal challenge. yes, i'm complex, and that's why i'm talking about what exactly, why lawyers resort to the help of colleagues, because you already evaluate differently. this is your personal. and here you are a professional and without bias, yes, and therefore, as it were, lawyers really do, but they give powers of attorney to their colleagues so as not to go to court. so that a colleague has already terminated the marriage

without his participation, and financially easy whether the average belarusian can afford the services of a lawyer. uh, there is an opinion that lawyers sometimes ask for crazy fees. yes, but it’s spelled out, the size of the fee, the procedure for determining it, is determined by agreement between the lawyer and the client, that is, the agreement can be five rubles million dollars, what we have is available with legal assistance. this is unequivocal, because we still take into account. and the new law has expanded the category of citizens to whom lawyers provide legal assistance at their own expense. here plus everything else there are categories of different things. eh, really very complex cases that are ready-made, that is, that require studying far from a single day, and therefore, er, therefore, there is such a concept in the law that this is an agreement depending on the complexity of the volume. the time that a lawyer needs to spend on studying, among other things,

legislation and judicial practice in this category of cases. well, all the same, uh, you need to rely on there is some kind of tariff rate determined there. uh, where are we from dance, and i want to see a lawyer, i must understand. and how much can the fees approved by the republican bar association cost me, which is determined depending on the category of the case. depending on whether i need to go on a business trip, i don’t need to. this is also, how would it all affect, uh, so to speak, here's the price tag. it's probably wrong. the amount of the fee. let's get the fees. well, i'm not applying. uh, never to lawyers, as to help, because i'm embarrassed at all. uh, moral damages we have evaluated. it seems to me that for some pennies , well, why do we constantly hear stories that she turned

coffee on herself at mcdonald's, somewhere in america she received 2 million dollars in moral damage that they didn’t write to her on a cup that she was hot, but we can not boast of such large sizes. why, what's stopping us? well, you know, have fun. it seems to me that this would move civil law forward very often people, and do not simply apply, because they think that they will spend more money on the price tag. than benefits will receive or reimbursement. this is what, in principle, i said, but earlier there is also judicial practice, that is, well, there is approximately, and the approximate category does, including, but a traffic accident, when harm is caused. eh, human health. we generally do not weigh this category, as it seems to me, yet. well, well, the most elementary you have served even badly there. after all, nerves are also stress, which lead to illnesses, to the purchase of medicines, and so on. well,

that is, somehow, not at all. in the air this concept of moral damage. you will agree. well, you know that this is not quite my category of cases, so i will not answer that question so categorically and confidently, but based on the fact that i am what i had in practice, based on conversations with colleagues in given on this occasion, people do not want to apply, that is, for this category with such, but requirements, because they believe that you absolutely correctly said that well, this will not be that game is not worth it. yes, the game is not worth the candle, you understand? well maybe it will be in the future develop. let's see, okay, you said there is a category of citizens who have the right to free legal assistance. you can call it at the expense of your colleague, and this is provided for in article 28 of the law on the advocacy of advocates. reality is also labor. there are controversies. there is a fairly large category, in addition to this, the advice of a colleague is

entitled. ah, according to a citizen. in if this is confirmed unconditionally by the documents of the little secured and so on, exempt from payment and, uh, the lawyer. e will be within work at the expense of a colleague every citizen. maybe, in principle, the council makes a decision in the case when a citizen is really in a difficult life situation. oh, let's say the same disabled person. uh, we have a lot, but they turn, and already disabled people and hmm elderly people who don’t go at all, and young lawyers leave us, too. uh, you need legal help. including drawing up a statement there, some kind of appeal to the court and so on. uh, so here, uh, advice colleagues. you see, since it's at the expense of funds in the board, it's at the expense of funds. a lawyer and therefore, of course, help is provided when it is also clear that a person in a

given difficult life situation cannot pay legal assistance to a lawyer, otherwise there have been cases in your practice when you have had the opportunity, uh, to defend a person who has committed some very a serious crime, and which you did not like. can you tell me i can for well, for me it was still in the old code i defended, but the rapist. and serial or not? it was one-part, yes, and it was a minor. it was classic rape. and here he really was, well, i'm unpleasant, but i did my job. and we got 10 years at that time, but then i wrote an old codex complaint and the minsk city court reduced his sentence by 3 years. and you are ashamed still

not ashamed. i did my job professionally. though i don’t like or dislike him, but you are a professional. this is your job. how to communicate? here with the relatives of the victim or you didn’t have the need for this communication, we have to communicate when, if, uh, the victims want it, that is, sometimes you even understand about it . from the same monetary compensation to the victim, and so on, that is, and therefore everything here depends on the relatives of the victim, or the victim himself. does he want to communicate? basically, i'm the lawyer for his abuser. if you take it with a simple language, and that's why sometimes people don't want to communicate. and i have a big fan of the series. e on these topics. so, when suddenly opposite a friend sits down, the lawyer solves the issues. there is such there is practice again. i will cite the same civil disputes, too, dissolution of marriage,

determination of the place of residence of children, or, uh, participation in the life of children of a separately living parent. that is, when one of the other parties has a lawyer, it is easier to agree, because again, aside, these are emotions. that is, like a husband and wife, that is, mother and father are emotions, but when two professionals sit opposite each other and talk and discuss. and among themselves. that is, taking into account lived. conventionally, first of all, we fulfill the wishes of the client, that is, but how would, because we are obliged to support. uh, we are obliged to do this here as well, but here it is easier for a person to tell there that from the point of view of the law. maybe so and so and exactly the same way another lawyer, the second side says that according to the point of view of law and jurisprudence. it can be so and so, and when you tell the parties that, well, it can’t be the way you want, because it’s against the law. here, then we so-called

conclude settlement agreements. i really love, that is, to finish the job in the world agreement and then both parties are satisfied when you conclude a settlement agreement from this to conclude that your recommendations are that both parties hire lawyers for such issues of such issues. i think the way, or something, yes, and emotions are so sometimes, but they capture people, they cannot let go of this situation, or forgive each other, that well, it goes off scale. i would say so, how often have become. this is exactly how to resolve issues when lawyers are busy or this is also not yet more often now and you know that now i really like it more often with uh spouses conclude a marriage contract between themselves, which many questions are removed. this is an order of magnitude more often the conclusion of a marriage contract of society, yet such an attitude towards them, as if, well, he doesn’t love you. well, how to choose, there is such, some have such an attitude that how is it that you offer me to

conclude a marriage contract. so you are already thinking that we will divorce you. it ’s wrong to think so, because a marriage contract can remove a lot of questions about property, children, alimony, participation in education, children understand, and it will be. well, not just civilized. this is the more correct way. why get into a lawsuit that can take years, as we've discussed before, if you can get it off. and questions from the beginning, you already said that lawyers should, well, should not, and they are recommended to communicate more with the media. well, there are open and closed processes, and at open processes you can often see them in the hall. e court representatives of the media. how do you feel about their presence to me hard. uh, whether i want to answer it or not, but hmm, i'll tell you. this was a case not so long ago, the case was covered by the press and my

defense lawyer testified, that is. well, here, i was definitely at the court session and i listened to what he was saying, and when, after 3 hours , i came out and read something completely different. you understand, that's why i have such an ambiguous attitude towards the fact that the press is present in the hall. and representatives of the diplomatic mission, when representatives of an outside presence also break in, it seems to me, yes, yes, it is not so much undesirable for a lawyer. as for the same accused who is worried, you know, he testifies, he needs to answer questions. and how would the prosecutor here and here. uh, hmm, many even ask their relatives not to come to court. but the fact that the journalist wrote on the decision of the court can not affect in any way. no, of course, definitely not. that is, you read, but you never know what, well, i, but it’s unpleasant for people, but for participants in the process. why don't they say it, they didn't say it. that's how you said the prenuptial agreement

it would be nice if it became our norm. so recently one of my colleagues. hmm , my age surprised me that she had already made a will. how often do you come across this that here is the middle age. people already think competently legally. well, you know that a will, even one she wrote in middle age, she can always change it, but each subsequent will will be a new one. and in general, we need this or is it some kind of yes, european, american music. i didn't have many of those cases. so that because a will is drawn up by notaries, they already come to us when, figuratively speaking, when they dispute a will, and so on. i just get in touch with the fact that a calm environment people began to think about at the moment of the sea, maybe, but i repeat once again, but how would a will be drawn up at the moment, a notary, you understand, so the lawyer is only the consequences of the will, then later. if there is

a dispute, sees, well, clearly, that is, she surprised not only me, but also you, what do you think about the jury trial is a difficult question, to be honest, but on today, we don't have it. and uh , you know, i didn't sit on a jury, probably the same as you and me. you only watch jurors here on tv. yes , so again. hmm why is a difficult question, because the jury is also a person and what they will be guided by, making a decision other than the evidence that is available in the case , it is also difficult to say, so i do not have a clear opinion. jurors, again . yes, here the emotionality of each person also affects the chess game chess game. now let's take a moment. let's break. after a short pause, we will return to this studio, while subscribe to our telegram channel. say, do not be silent, but look for all our releases on the youtube channel, belarus is one.

this region is called little venice. as you understand, due to the weather conditions , we won’t be able to start a trip in a raincoat, but in no case will this interfere with our acquaintance with the city; however , hundreds and even thousands of kilometers will not interfere with traveling around belarus, a unique architectural building one of the most well-known names of the belaya vezha tower although white in color throughout its history. she never was. by the way, who didn’t know this particular tower is depicted on a five-ruble banknote, the national belarusian authenticity home morning, where clothes and quality items were stored, a red corner, a bed and a stove , something like this looked like a typical belarusian hut and incredibly many positive emotions. for the first time i see a bison, they were born, by

the way, this year hello travel online with belarus 24 tv channel. the story of each hero is amazing and unique, i came from the city of mumbai, which is located in western india. i came to belarus to get a higher education. today i am a member of the belarusian dancesport federation. they came to belarus to build their lives here and do everything for the development of the country in our studio there are guys who became champions of the republic of belarus in ballroom dancing from india we have many graduates who have already become very good doctors and i dream of beating, in short,

a doctor belarus has become a second home for them. i can say that i love belarusians , it is here that i acquired my great happiness. my family has never been to belarus . and i really expect them to come here and see for themselves, and such a beautiful country, watch the project a look at belarus on our tv channel. lawyer is a prestigious profession. she has always been popular to this day. it seems to me that this interest is also preserved among young people, and our guest is the chairman of the minsk city colleague of lawyers, vera oreshka vera gennadievna, you have already said that minsk lawyers often take part in

various e-actions, let's call them that, including legal education. yes. just the other day, in the capital tenth school , something like this happened. here is an event for the parents of students to discuss the issues of criminal liability of minors for illegal trafficking in narcotic psychotropic substances. lawyers are engaged in hunting these are the lawyers of the minsk city collegium who conduct such lectures and talks a lot, including with the main department of justice, we constantly hold shares in various kinds of enterprises factories. e hmm in front of labor collectives. and such lectures like this, uh, lectures are still very important for minors, because unfortunately, indeed, recently, very often , uh, minors are involved in the abuse of narcotic drugs. and it is important to pay the attention of parents to behavior.