Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]  BELARUSTV  December 26, 2022 1:05pm-1:51pm MSK

1:05 pm
the days of the week of the outgoing year will pass under the influence of atlantic cyclones and warm air masses of oceanic origin at the beginning of the week on monday and tuesday, with the displacement of atmospheric fronts on the territory of poland, precipitation will occur in many parts of the country, the air temperature on tuesday night will fluctuate from 8 ° below zero to the north -east to plus five in the south-west of the country, but on tuesday afternoon from zero to six plus in the future until the end of the working week. uh, the weather also promises to be unseasonable, warm medicine, roads and wet coverage, motorists and pedestrians should be as careful as possible. new information. at my colleagues at 15:00 on our air. all the best.
1:06 pm
in our program, the most active schoolchildren from all over belarus, alexandra, i answered option b in the fourth, since five meet, 125 follows by 5/4 - this is 625. i know that the middle ages are divided into three periods. it 's early middle and late so i answered. yes, they will find answers to all questions ; three, to be honest, i answered no, because i am more inclined to answer in this definition, they are ready to surprise and conquer the altar, and the broken is written with two letters. n, firstly, because to break what to do, and because there is a word inadvertently. watch an intellectual entertainment show. i know on tv channel
1:07 pm
belarus 24 tensions in the information space. i don't see anything terrible. yes, i will answer for this. why it is possible and necessary to doubt this figure in the direction of its increase in the new releases of the club project editors, experts continue to discuss the most important socio-political events and the impact of the media on public opinion, therefore, of course, analytics. uh, the collection of materials today should come out on top in the world once again the world, only this provides the basis for the further development of the club of editors. watch on belarus 24 tv channel.
1:08 pm
andrey yevgenyevich good evening, a good conversation with the head of the union of journalists after the most important informational occasion from the president, i see it is necessary because of not only the statements of the two leaders, but also the situation around these
1:09 pm
statements. and who, if not an expulovet, knows the kitchen of these behind-the-scenes conversations. yes , it is customary to enter the new year without old debts, and now the long-awaited meeting of the allies in minsk emphasized. now, if we assume that 60% of the allied programs have been implemented, the trade turnover reaches 40 billion according to the weather and the plans that they announced in advance are literally from strategic and space ones. can we assume that the union took place? as for the atmosphere, the atmosphere of the meeting really matters; it is not superficial, it is not fake. she's not clean media, uh, it reflects, uh, a policy built on trust, equality and respect. this atmosphere and as for when the union arose. i think that any union of such a scale of depth and level arises from
1:10 pm
, uh, the national interests of the people and the political will of the leader, therefore i am deeply convinced that the union of belarus of russia took place back in the ninety-eighth year, when the belarusian people decided on the reintegration of the post-soviet. and the belarusian leader alexander lukashenko conveyed this message to moscow literally. well, in those conditions pushed through the union state first the commonwealth community, belarus russia then the union state after that and the union developed thanks in many ways. through the efforts of the belarusian president, we remember the 2000s and the president’s visits to the regions, which a significant part of such a liberal-oriented russian elite looked
1:11 pm
askance at, put spokes in the wheels and the same social guarantees of belarus russia for a long time we they perceived it as air, when a given that has always been and will always be, but a pandemic happened and anti-covid restrictions closed the borders and it was clear how the border regions began to degrade, which kept free movement, both from the belarusian side and from the russian side ours is less. because the influence of the state was greater. or the economy, those integration ties that the president of belarus maintained all zero and after 2010, in which he invested, among other things, his political capital. ah, it happened, uh, the twenty-second year of a special military operation, and it turned out that
1:12 pm
many of the technologies on which, among other things, the military-industrial complex rests, we will take, and the bearing enterprise exists and has been preserved only in belarus and they have enough in the russian federation contractors with whom, at the very least, communication or optics or space technologies or new materials were maintained. and what happened after a personal meeting in minsk, the union state really received such a strategic a backlog of strength for at least 3-4 years, that is, there are union integration programs around which it is not for me to tell you. how many copies were broken there, almost swallowing up the surrender of sovereignty and all the other nonsense that was aimed at only one thing, to split the allies e, to introduce this note between them, at least distrust to sow such distrust, but it turned out in 2022 that
1:13 pm
it was precisely thanks to these allied programs, the allied state can adequately, uh, withstand without panic. well, the hardest pressure throughout the history, probably, of the 20th and 21st centuries, which any state in the world would experience. you know, andreevich, the thought occurred to me that, probably, our western partners still have not understood that the slavs need to create problems. as much as possible, yes, in order for them to derive the maximum benefit from these problems for themselves. well, let's start, the dark man will not burst. yes, no one canceled. well, let's start with azov, more precisely, from the airport, a personal meeting at the airport, a trip in the same car, the presidents even sit side by side. and how noted many look in one direction. yes, and not how is the macron and putin sitting, yes, 10 meters
1:14 pm
from each other opposite. home dinner and , of course, seeing off at the airport. after such an almost homely atmosphere. is this a special political etiquette, or should we see something more in this, of course, political etiquette, but also much more than one canadian political strategist political scientist. in my opinion, in one of the interviews, he said a brilliant phrase that modern world politics is repulsed and degraded due to two things: fear and distrust in politics between politicians, so when alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin demonstrate absolute trust, absolutely friendly disposition, unwillingness to lose even a few minutes there or several tens of minutes on the way from the airport to the palace
1:15 pm
of independence, but use it. yut him for negotiations to clarify the position for a personal dialogue, including on the most closed topics. this shows that in relations between belarus there is no russia, no fear, no trust, which means that the union state of the relationship between belarus and russia is between official minsk and official moscow has a solid foundation. ok then. let's have a little more political text then, shall we? the western media like to reproach that our, as the head of state said, the most toxic politicians are very common in the twenty- second year, of course, indicative in this regard, but in your opinion, they still occur often or rarely, they occur often, but this fully corresponds to the scope and depth of what the presidents said at the press conference following the meeting. e our
1:16 pm
relations in all spheres of economic political military from the point of view of security, of course, humanitarian social whatever, and does not imply the frequency of meetings such a relationship between a master and a subordinate, so they said someone some third-rate, third adviser of the second department fulfilled it. e of the washington state department. even not the main chief set the task to check the execution. he gave the order, or the relationship between uh, the rich economy of the banana republic. well, there, that means beads from there, bananas, that's a simple relationship. why meet often, and when between belarus and russia we reach a coordinated industrial policy or a common one, even now we began to talk about a common industrial policy five to seven years ago. uh, if you say
1:17 pm
something like that in the russian media space, it is disgusting. again, liberal -minded economists. there's an exception. maybe dugin delagin glazev, who always talked about this in russia, these were wishes. rather, yes, which were not in a hurry , fell out, you can say about import substitution. but this is a huge piece of belarusian the russian economy now and this is a matter of the survival of states, but also caused a denial. and now all this needs to be said. vladimir putin, among other things , said this for sure, but the president puts the dot over and this does not mean that they directly tell state corporations or businesses how to do it no government and in this, by the way, the role of the belarusian government and the russian government is developing e -road map, well, it’s fashionable to say, yes, or the union program, and the presidents fasten them with their political will, thereby
1:18 pm
guaranteeing their execution accurately and on time. you know i liked it. eh, that's literally a personal impression. uh, i've met people on numerous occasions who literally say that when our presidents meet. for some reason, this adds a special confidence in the future, but i liked it. actually such a message. unfortunately, this was not always the case. and now working for the poolers. i also faced this. e. two meetings here in strelna when we first entered into gas pricing for a three-year period and a meeting in sochi after meeting in sochi, i just had the honor to interview the president, belarus tête-à-tête, and in order to prepare me, through the press secretary of the president, they handed over the volume of documents that were discussed at this meeting the very thick folder that
1:19 pm
lay on the president's table. i remember he talked about it. yes. and to be honest, here are 6 hours before the interview. it was not enough for me to study all this folder exactly. i went through the tops, to be honest, i will say, but the volume of questions, which then spoiled. in fact, they spoiled the relations of the allies. just impressed by the discrimination of belarusian cargo carriers. this includes the logistics of ebotage transport to the energy market and the admission of belarusian food to the russian market. but as they say, who will remember the old. i just want to say that a is huge. the volume of questions, which is tied to the level of the president and that's good. in the sense that, in fact, if the presidents make a decision, and specifically, if vladimir putin makes a decision, then for
1:20 pm
the russian side. it is mandatory and it is valid for us for belarusian exporters for the belarusian government for the belarusian e pool of humanitarian cooperation. these are universities of medicine. this means it will be done. well, you understand. we have always been very different in this regard, because as they say at the kremlin, how many towers there were up to five? yes, we have always had a very clear centralization of power. we did not have such a problem, but at the same time, she never asked the brain, minsk to take part in a special operation in ukraine directly. yes, directly, yes. but how only now this meeting of the presidents was marked putin's arrival in belarus yes , now it started like a war. that's who actually benefits from all these rumors and conspiracy theories, and why instead
1:21 pm
of the topic of ukraine yes, the president discussed the defense of france in the match with argentina. well, especially the president said. he spoke very interestingly. yes, how i rooted for the brazilians for lack of it, and why why this is how the question was posed see you. and this is a sign of our time, that is, it is first thrown into the media space. eh, absolutely. a far-fetched absolutely false thesis, for example, that, uh, a special military operation will last 3 days, and then to the russian federation russian military russian politicians have never spoken for three days, but then they begin to demonize russian politicians and the russian military, they begin to attribute defeats to them, because the same thing didn’t happen for 3 days, and here our
1:22 pm
enemies, first of all, with political geopolitical information important to drive in, klin in relations between minsk and moscow, because this bundle guarantees our sovereignty and our security, it is important for them to expose us as aggressors in the global media field. ah, those who overthrow, the foundations of international law. although those who do this themselves dozens of examples are already worth it. yes, and hundreds of times i agree violated. this is the most international law, unleashing wars, killing millions of people, provoking hunger, poverty, a mass exodus of entire peoples from their land, and killing scientists, killing politicians, including using contract killings, killing journalists, remember dashul a. well. severity and the sign of the modern world order
1:23 pm
is that imposing media simulacra. unfortunately, it is possible to win local tactical victories in the information war, and since the information war accompanies the real hybrid war, it is one of its most important elements, and this brings it closer. unfortunately, the victory of our enemies, well, or tactical victoria, these are the headlines, of course, the western press. i know that you are always interested in what foreign publications write, what was in them in the avant-garde on the eve of the meeting. well, we can quickly run and really looked. e that wrote about this meeting. well, let's go to those who are directly just directly a propagandist and serve the interests. eh, london, brussels and washington, to what extent putin did not persuade lukashenka to enter the war
1:24 pm
with ukraine. this is the very example, that is, they themselves invent horror and fear for themselves. the fact that belarus is about to enter directly into the conflict with its armed forces, and then they shift the responsibility for this to alexander lukashenko and vladimir putin. propaganda, rubbish dump radio liberty resource lukashenka said that he unconditionally supports russia, while in small print that russia was pushing lukashenka into the war? well , it is useless to quote in the ukrainian media, because there the level of russophobia, belarusianophobia is now off scale and even these headlines themselves are indecent. bbc news ukraine steps up border security amid putin-lukashenko meeting but i think they've been stepping up security for months
1:25 pm
to belarus by the shortest route in order to avoid a war of ukrainian mines on the border with belarus, this has already become commonplace, but in fairness it should be noted that there are quite, er, serious headlines and quite serious analysis of what this was actually dedicated to meeting. well, we're tired of tea. uh, putin lukashenko met to strengthen the economic interaction between russia and belarus hmm, that is, there is a healthy media community, there are countries that soberly assess the belarusian-russian agenda and they are trying not to replicate the headlines of the bbc reuters er, the european wonderful union of this content exchange, but on their own, relying on belarusian and russian sources er, to analyze both the course of the
1:26 pm
meeting and the results of the meeting. well, you have already touched on the topic of the economy. yes, the last one with this heading. let's move on to it, we just managed to save the main ones. this is what was said at the meeting. yes, industrial production and cooperation. yes, and so that no one tilted anyone. we talked about the fact that the president also - it was noted that the trade was a record last year in terms of results, 22. he again goes to another record. here, in your opinion, from the point of view of a journalist who knows how to analyze where there is still room for acceleration and why we are no longer talking about tactics, but the emphasis is on strategic directions in the economy. what has changed our environment has pushed us we are in fact for a long time almost a decade and a half and from the russian side of the
1:27 pm
belarusian, understanding the national interests. ah, they slowed down some integration projects. well take let's say that the potash industry in belarus was ready for itself, and creating the belarusian potash company was ready for the closest, but honest and equal integration with russian partners. uralkali slavkali, we perceived to a certain extent as competitors. let's talk. we were ready , yes, we were ready, but when we saw from the other side, it was not the allied approach on the part of businessmen, but a purely commercial outbid to seize the markets. uh, outbid specialists. and of course, uh, belarus is tough. in the eyes of their national economic interest, the same thing happened on the russian side many times now, the need to build a new economy under external pressure and the
1:28 pm
global trend towards the localization of economic blocs. that is, before. we had the main word globalism. yes, globalization. that's all should be common single free markets. eh, now it is already clear that this is utopia and moreover. uh, stupid utopia no, we sincerely believed. yes, the free market, indeed, can decide everything on its own and regulate itself, and no one is there will not interfere politically, limiting some countries with sanctions and completely, opening up opportunities for others. well, just as they say, these are american economists and analysts, as soon as, uh, they began to win the race of globalism. not them, but china globalism. immediately had to turn off immediately ended. well, yes, localization within the framework of large integration structures, here is the union state and the cis eurasian economic union brix sco. this is our economic
1:29 pm
living space, which is a strategic project, but we started talking about this is not in the twentieth year, not in the nineteenth. we started talking about pairing the eurasian economic union and the shanghai cooperation organization. god grant the memory 5 years ago, that is, even then the official minsk had a strategic vision for the president of belarus. our ancestors are real male craft cooperage, our potato pancakes are not for nothing that we are called bulbash. legends are nearby culture in all its glory watch every week
1:30 pm
the culture fashion project on belarus 24 tv channel. in our project we will show you unique personalities, in general i am a person, which even without settings on intuition. that is, i'm still more of an artist than i certainly do not understand. where it comes from, i can't even put my idea down on paper. they just flies off from somewhere above me, and do not break stereotypes by example and their own experience, walking around the fabric store. i caught my eye, a certain fabric, which i was looking for, probably with a push. i realized that this is my bagnovich. he was that incarnation. it seems to me that the completion of this
1:31 pm
article of the incompleteness of my father's life. see in program to break stereotypes on belarus 24 tv channel. well, look, we have been building the union for 20 years. yes, there is a parallel with the european union today, it feels like it is rotting. i don’t like this word, yes, but they do everything to bury themselves exactly how the union was the soviet union . in our relations with russia. this is the construction of the union yes, which has intensified over the past 2 years. here, in your opinion, what is the difference then? the key difference between our union and those unions that i have named and can be from other such a difference, but here just in time for your previous question. and where else do we have
1:32 pm
growth points. our union state provides belarus with a small average european country a unique chance to get in touch with world-class technologies speech about new materials that are used, including in space turn the energy around the world. uh, fast neutron reactor. it's just this cosmic level above space. the technologies that belarus, thanks to the union state, has access to, has the opportunity to develop its competencies on russian bases, the president of belarus spoke about this when we launched, uh, the first unit of the belarusian nuclear power plant in an island, no one in the world shares such technologies. that is, even if a
1:33 pm
nuclear power plant is delivered to you. on your territory , it will be the americans, the japanese, or the french, they won’t share technology with you, they won’t let you into the holy of holies nuclear energy in its full sense, which is attached to the new electrification of electric transport. and uh, data protection, which is important today and uh, new uh. a new connection that requires colossal supplies of electricity, a and new civil construction. that is, here are houses with electricity. heating is, after all, a new quality of life for every belarusian, the same applies to materials where we are still missing, in my opinion, and how the union state compares favorably from the point of view. uh, market size. this, of course, is the service sector from engineering to again uh, high tech it. i
1:34 pm
mean digitalization here, uh, russia to a greater extent, belarus to a lesser extent. we relied on imports and this is our vulnerable part and the third component of e. this is certainly building the union on these equal, mutually respectful rails. everything that is happening now in the european union and in other unions demonstrates, a. the famous formula i am the boss. you are a fool. and in relation to the so-called new members of the european union, the countries of the so-called old europe or, uh, as we see it in relations between poland and germany desires, but the new europeans, eh? create a revanchist project in relation to the old europeans, with the germans in mind. after all, it was not by chance that i designated the term that
1:35 pm
rots the european union, you know, when there are scandals of a corruption nature in european structures, whether it be the purchase of 4 billion doses of vaccine, yes, for every inhabitant. uh, when ursula and her husband put 16 billion into her pocket, is it really in her pocket, or is there a scandal in the european parliament now? yes, as it were, yes, quite right with the barrel associated, and i 'm sure. you know, i have the assumption that this scandal will not reach here, otherwise they won in court. we learn a lot of interesting things only about him and not only about him. quite right. where corruption begins, as he said, it's always fucked up. rust travels to any structure instantly. i hoped. i was hoping, frankly , that you would still outline one area. in part, non-economic is not directly related to the economy, but it must definitely develop. you are definitely still only at the beginning of the path to the formation of a single information or, i would say, media
1:36 pm
space. moreover, this space must be very strong in order to take into account the shortcomings that contributed to the fact that we lost our tools to influence the west. and now here we need to take such fairly quick steps. it seems to me that our partners should also understand that, in general, this should be a single space with equal access, not only to each other's economies, but also to information tools. you are participating in our e-club, friends of the editors-in-chief of experts from belarus to russia. after all, it was the first attempt going below from the editors-in-chief, but to build at least a coordinated reduction policy on key topics for us. protection of historical memory protection of the common. information space after all, you and i created this club, in fact. no one
1:37 pm
told us from above about this, that let's create such a club of chief editors in order to at least understand what is happening in the information space of russia. what is happening in the information space of belarus, which is sensitive for us. and what is sensitive for our colleagues, we did it and in my opinion in this helped belarus in many ways, uh, both in 1919 and 2020, meaning both the pandemic and ours. uh, socio-political upheaval events. eh, and this is now helping russia here. imagine if such a self-organization from below. and russian media people have contacts with you and ivan mikhailovich. vladimir is longer than the all-russian state television and radio broadcasting company russia 24 komsomolskaya pravda, it would simply not be and a special military operation begins. here's how to explain. belarusians
1:38 pm
opinion leaders to people like you who form information policy. why did russia do it ? what goals does it pursue, what results does it expect and how will the belarusian-russian interaction be built against the backdrop of a special war operation in all your wonderful speech? yes, there is one point that i would like to dwell on for now. this is the first attempt yes, and now we must understand what needs to be done so that it is far from being the first, and so that we take into account all those problems that, unfortunately, have arisen or have not been resolved. up to this day. you you yourself know very well that in our club some problems arose in the twentieth year and thank god that we have these problems. we didn't take them out. yes, we understood them, we understood them, this is the main question, a provocative one, but thanks to the strength of our leader. and the support of russia under the conditions of the colossal pressure of sanctions
1:39 pm
yes, first of all, and political, of course, not only did not fall, well, we are developing. well, the truth is, the majority of the population practically did not feel these sanctions. let's talk straight. pardon the pettiness. well, even one new year illumination. yes, on the street of the city it is such for the envy of many countries. we can afford. but other countries see it. in your opinion, will this be a good example and, say, a prerequisite for some other countries to also want to want to join our union, knowing full well that threats of sanctions are threats of pressure. it is not fatal and often does not work. many countries are already striving for the closest e-partnership with the union state in any format and the
1:40 pm
brix format and the sco format and in the cst format realizing that this is an equal union built on new principles, taking into account the realities of the modern economy. not planned, not always planned, let's say, but this is beneficial, it also ensures the national interest with these countries for their security. and take iran the country is underestimated the state is underestimated on the world stage, although at the highest level, including scientific knowledge, if the state itself is developing its peaceful civilian nuclear project. take, uh, the countries of latin america, what the president calls the far arc, uh, belarusian foreign policy partnerships and alliances. that is, those countries with which we have traditionally and thanks to the president built good foreign policy and economic relations. take huge asia and
1:41 pm
african countries with which we also have, uh, there are mutually beneficial projects that pull us closer to each other, and he recently returned from vietnam a huge state that is growing at an enormous pace and which this golden billion or the collective west prefers not to notice. although, uh, the corporations of that same collective west with a huge happy to invest. tens of billions in vietnam may potential uh-huh by the way, the ambassador of belarus to vietnam in an interview told me that one of the first articles of import from vietnam to belarus was smartphones. and we still sometimes perceive these countries as suppliers of dried fruit rubber there. no, it's far from being shifted there to asia , the president said about this, the center of gravity of the global world economy is shifting to asia.
1:42 pm
this is our eurasia, this is our space. we are not giving up on europe by any means a european state, but we, thanks to the belarusian mentality, uh, the belarusian creative approach in economics and politics, we see eurasia, apparently africa, apparently latin america, therefore , how a huge number of countries will cooperate with us depends on the success of the project of the union state of our iron state who make up the majority of humanity. the key message is important to them. an example, of course. look new year is coming soon belarusians. before new year. they traditionally followed a certain quest. yes, that is, not only behind the irony of fate on tv or blue lights, but also behind the negotiations between russia and belarus on gas. well , it was no less epic and everyone was talking about it. and it seems. here is such a trend, it is outdated and says non-existence is leaving. at first, you
1:43 pm
remember, our president said that such a rather provocative question was asked by a russian journalist. as far as we are satisfied with the price of gas such that it does not matter how much the gas will cost. the main thing is that it costs the same for the belarusian enterprise and for the russian quite logical. yes, equal conditions of the economy is not about that. we have been talking for many years following this meeting, the presidents confirmed that the agreements on energy carriers have been reached , and many have tried p5. yes , and she left for the next 3 years, as it was designated at least. so, here they were after 20 and 22 years. after these events, russian gas is more allied. i think that the word of vladimir putin has also become here, uh, played a decisive role. uh, i repeat, you can’t apply to most of our integration programs
1:44 pm
projects as a purely commercial enterprise, because in business is in commerce. ah, hypocrisy is permissible, it is permissible to profit from the losses and expenses of your counterpart but in the union project this is unacceptable in the union project it is permissible when both sides win, and i myself, uh, now i won’t name the year, but i spent one of the new year’s nights in in gazprom, this is true . the solution to this sore point and the new year according to russian russian clocks. i met driving past the kremlin wall, when the agreement for a year was only concluded, but belarusian just arriving at the hotel at the embassy of the republic of belarus in moscow, i am personally glad that we have now managed to include energy, gas, oil, in the
1:45 pm
union meaning of union logic. agree for a couple of years now. we don't remember it at all. yes , this is actually a fundamentally important arrangement for what you have defined for trust. yes, because in this case, well, trust, it must be supported by a specific meaning. so uh, there is still a question that, probably, cannot be ignored. military question. yes, although, i'm not a military man in this case, we will talk like journalists. yes, it happened on duty, belarus delivered the s400 anti-aircraft missile systems, excellent systems, as a specialist, let's say iskander yes, which were transferred to russia. i personally understand that this military cooperation is defensive, because. well, when we talk about zenith missile systems. it's obviously a defense. yes, i
1:46 pm
would rather attribute it to the situation when the president said that we want peace, but if you poke your nose, you will receive, this is a weapon of retribution. yes, this weapon is retaliation, and it should be. here russia fulfilled its promises given six months ago as president. marked no questions. but how did you perceive such an increase in the belarusian defense industry. this is a security enhancement. e of our republic is the defense of all-union borders. and this is again the level of trust between the two leaders and the two states in the union project, because if the russian federation transfers to belarus the most modern weapons that are in russia and now in belarus if at the same time, one must understand, belarusian military specialists are trained to use this most modern weapon. this
1:47 pm
shows the degree of trust and the degree of security, returning to those false currents and fakes that were thrown into the information space, and one of the main memes. it was that, in the union project, belarus infringes on its sovereignty, and so this is absolutely a lie. getting the most modern weapons gets access. e to russian energy resources as a scientific project of the program. we are designing. belarus expands opportunities its sovereignty in the economy in security in politics, that is, the ability to influence the global process. after all, it was announced before. what if there will be peace talks on ukraine if there will be, that is, if there is no surrender defeat, otherwise belarus will take part in them, is this not an expansion of the sovereignty of belarus through the opportunity to influence the regional
1:48 pm
pan-european agenda and problem. well, you can’t argue here at all and i absolutely agree with such a message, you know, when the ex-minister of defense of lithuania and now the us mep difficult, pronounce my last name. yes , who cares, that google claims that after the victory of ukraine, belarus as a sovereign state will be destroyed, yes, russia should fall apart. they are just dreaming yes , so that it falls apart, and so that the resources get. the west is the main goal by and large, but under these conditions, to be honest, they do not provide their security military security is criminal, let's say it straight. well, let's talk about the good last about the philosophical pleasant question here this week we celebrated a year since the opening of the first merch store,
1:49 pm
yes, a cool store already has several things, by the way, in our russian colleagues , the head of the arts, the world of russia today e komsomol. eh, i always bring new items as a gift. and it is really cool to wear and causes delight in our russian rights coming abroad. they are the first question, either we go or where to buy, right? but these trendy things they usually have a very short lifespan. yes, you know, although there are eternal topics, there are eternal topics, yes. but we are talking about specific things that are bought for the season, but this did not happen with the store of the first. yes, they are expanding their range, but those things that were sold a year ago are still popular now, but on the eve of the new year holidays. especially the question, probably with a catch. what new phrase of the president? you would put it into circulation just
1:50 pm
for the release of such products, but if you get attached, here is the most relevant news trip, then, probably, the most important phrase that was heard at the meeting. e alexander lukashenka and vladimir putin are more important than money today. this phrase carries a colossal semantic load, calls for the mobilization of our creative potential, but i have a few phrases that, in my opinion, are underestimated and that i personally like because of my, er, convictions, my civil political position. well, firstly, belarus this is my destiny. this fits very well with personal responsibility for the fate of one's state. we can do everything, too. the president said this to those three questions.

20 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on