chances are up to the level of a regional power, but as they say, well, okay, at this stage we will not ruin you, as they said. there are all sorts of small states and so on. well, if russia accepts such conditions, this will be the end for russia as a sovereign state, this is me. i think that russian society will not accept this, but on the other hand. for why is it important? and here is elon musk, a number of business circles, what we see, and here is the conspiracy case in germany, which is a signal for many influential circles of business circles who say, we are against the war, but these are the constant mantras of proteges of the western oligarchy such as bags and others about the continuation of the war. they er send, as it were , signals why. because in the west there is a growing mood against the war, we see public opinion, strongly opposed. i'll tell you even more. it's not in vain. she also mentions the president of the electoral companies, the upcoming

poles do not want to fight, the polish society does not want to fight. duda admitted this in a conversation with the pranksters. and we already see it, and they need to constantly raise the level of chauvinism in order to convince his people and kissinger's article is a reflection of the extremely contradictory moods that have developed back, on the one hand. really. we see that the poles do not want to fight, but at the same time there are regular exercises there. look, local journalists say that the ruling circles. warsaw has already developed a plan for the return of historical lands. in poland , military training camps have been set up in the country, and men aged 18 to 65 receive summons for the training camps. this is one date liberator, march, kiev journalists write, supposedly scheduled for may 4, the headline reads, the agony of the kiev regime. only duda knows exactly when zelensky will disappear. at the same time, we see that it did not happen, but increased, and the military budget of poland, it will continue to grow. and despite the fact that we see that

polish guys are standing near the military enlistment offices and protesting, nevertheless. we see that a lot of poles want to be retrained want to get some kind of combat skills. well, at least polish television is actively talking about it, then i’ll just say one thing, that, speaking by slippery commissioners, let’s say, they simply say, right sash 2/3 poles are clearly imprisoned for russophobia 2/3 they think that 75% of the polish population is russophobic and in this regard we can’t do anything. yes, and what the fucker is doing there, and so other passports are absolutely not, of course, yes, and so that the coffin of hundreds of hatred is one thing, and, of course, when the coffins went now. uh, mercenaries from ukraine about 1,700 destroyed by polish mercenaries.

they also started grabbing their heads. somehow so the polish lords so kills ukraine and for what and why clean water stuffing. how can any operation be announced in advance with a specific date on may 4 - this is pure water, another informational attack, and it seems to me that the same 2/3 alexander does not know how much she will call with your colleague. e in poland is a poll, but they support it. it is easier than the territory of western ukraine, the territory of poland it is obvious, but 30%, completely, er, reject and moreover, they are radically opposed to entering into any military conflicts. e republic poland well, here, too, i would like to return to the previous issue, the statement of kisenja. this is what he was talking about. vadim frantsvich, this is most likely such a soft yeltsin russia, this model now seems to be the most effective for the americans, because, probably, it’s hard enough to split it into 10 sub-regional sub-regional formations, then

those who are ready to follow the yeltsin path remained to control this situation traditional, in principle, in the united states , democrats are the party of war. and here we must learn that this is not quite even a victory. well , if we assume so, it’s just purely strategic, arguing that ukraine's victory is not enough, but it's incredible nonetheless. not in the air. this is a serious bonus for the democrats, and another lever is already working, as elon musk talked about, and here are the republicans. well, this does not mean that these are pro-russian people . this is a political feature of the internal struggle of the united states. and, of course, the position of russia is so much about, in that case it will be much stronger when they have obviously successes, and in advancing the goals and objectives of the special military operation. well, here, in general, the analysis is correct is another matter. let's remember the repeated statement of our president. they are trying to bully them in every possible way. they

just don't do anything there. well, clearly said, guys. agree or it will be worse. look here . a year ago in december. russia has made its proposals. they were unacceptable, in fact, they came down to recognizing the neutral status of ukraine well, and so in a mild form, ending this fierce there is no anti-russian campaign that was unfolding there, they said it had begun. russia is ready for a military operation and not just ready to start negotiations now, if you get the tyumart agreement, which they began to negotiate here on the territory of belarus, then in istanbul. and then everyone was indignant, both in russia and in ukraine. if you get it. i think many would be ready to sign it, including kiev politicians, as alexander lukashenko said. if you don't start negotiations now, this will lead to concessions to russia. e to the fact that you have to sign a surrender, but you can not underestimate the russian people, their willingness to fight for their interests, there was no split in russia a. if

this does not happen, the russian people will go to the end, we see what an upsurge of patriotism in russia it is, if in moscow, i'm not talking about the regions. we had to pass through e, that means different regions of russia when you go to the donbass. i assure you that in orel and voronezh and in a word, people do not need to explain what the goals of a special military operation are, how these rings are compressed anacondas hmm, they understand that the belarusians, in general, spoiled the implants. specifically, we changed this structure for the implementation of a large strategy. and it happened in the twentieth year. this is not propaganda, a cliché - it is really a statement that you are observing now very briefly. tell your people they spoiled it, when alexander lukashenko was elected in the ninety-fourth year, here they are from that time and bite their elbows, because nothing can be done to the rights of the belarusian people's

intuition that such a decision was made then, and the most important moment is now for us we understand that 23 is not the time when we will only observe what is happening on the territory of the ukrainian front. we will constantly experience the pressure of what is now called the hybrid forces of the hybrid threat again and again. we are now in the process of creating this stabilizing body of factors in the video of the entire belarusian people's assembly, that is, a certain guardian e, the collective guardian of our statehood sounds great great image is well positioned, but how to make it really be in practice this effective guardian of the state , vladimir francevich, what he already has now, if anything, we, as a society, can bring from him and should do it. well, here they sit and uh, representatives of civil society alexander sergeevich eh. see what we are doing, we are sensible from our belarusian

position. so you correctly told such people's intuition the basic elements of our political system, without looking around , despite the west, without copying their model, because as soon as we start copy. we immediately make bookmarks with which they can pull these strings and mani. our system here is our main task. what is the sovereignty of belarus, it is not necessary in the originality of our constitutional system. before that, be afraid, you don’t have to peep and copy anything from anyone. e our modern constitution is the basic law, based on the centuries- old traditions of the belarusian statehood. yes, we update them. the concept of civil society has appeared, but we give it our own interpretation. we when we talk about political parties. we do not deny them. look, we're long. yes, we are discussing, because this question, which, if we pass a law now, is how

all the belarusian people's assembly now constitutional laws. yes, for years, the task of alexander lukashenko is to determine the long-term course of development of the belarusian society. what is the difference between statesmen of the scale of putin's ukashenka, for example, from these politicians. the case, which we endlessly quote, here we have here, if here look, we’ll just give an example for the sake of example, there stoltenberg ursula vonderlein barrel , now someone will remember the name of those people who were in these positions before them, only narrow specialists. yes it turned out to be very images in this rather statesman. this is not including the fact that he stays long or short, he thinks about the country, he thinks about the next generations , it seems important now. uh absolutely right notes in one, france is precisely the long-term planning and draft law of the entire belarusian people's assembly. he calculated not even for today and not for tomorrow.

it is designed for 5-10-15-20 years ahead. this, of course, is a sign of e, a stable power in our country, and now it is necessary to focus on the training of personnel over a ten-fifteen-year period. let's talk straight uh, the former greenhouse conditions and comfortable environment for the current environment. will not. we have to plan our work in the conditions of a special military operation under the conditions of reorientation of our economic flows, but, uh, vns is like once again, the institution that is our belarusian unique instrument of direct democracy, which will represent absolutely every section from the youth of women veterans to professional politicians, but first of all, ordinary working people, who will be delegated the opportunity to represent the interests of a particular working collective and in this respect from the republic of belarus take. an example of how it was done when we adopted the constitution and now we can

literally analyze it according to statistics. we have representatives leader. union of youth listen, i remember how much even our russian brothers criticized. well, what are you clinging to the komsomol tradition from the number of congresses of the banners of the ordin, that they are still doing the same thing , creating an all-russian movement of children. well done, let's just komsomol, let's just do this and finish it. the program is about stopping playing democracy, that is , we see what these standard ones lead to. that is, this is a management system invented specifically for this, but democracy in itself is not bad. that is, it matters how she working. and how does it take root in your territory. so, i will now formulate you, you will definitely continue. i would like to end with a replica of the argentines when they come there is no mission, although he is not bad. and the argentines, when their washington post reproached that well, there are so few black players in the argentina national team and they are one of the political parties, argentina answered very well. they said because we are a country they are disney cartoons. here's how we do not

lose, this one and many of these countries, which in one way or another broke, either by deeds, they emphasize their identity and respond roughly like these argentines. we are not a disney cartoon. we are a country. here's how to preserve it, so that, on the one hand, these achievements of the civilization of human culture can be preserved in the form of democracy, after all, the capabilities of the population. and every person to take part in the life of society, but on the other hand , do not take the formats that ultimately destroy the foundation of your state, as for the term democracy, i would like to bring such a small thesis of joseph vissarionovich. stalin who said, yes, so we must congratulate. yes i believe yes, yes that's what democracy says. e, roosevelt explained to me very well when he says democracy is not the power of the people, it is the power of the american people, but it is with regards to this thesis that we are building a civilized policy for our

country today separately, here we must be guided by our head of state, who noted that the basis including the formation of the law, the entire belarusian people's assembly lies exclusively belarusian national interest and historical memory and in general the basis of our statehood. and here. it is probably important to preserve the two most important principles of stability and continuity. so politicians are in the geopolitical course. and, of course, this is the most powerful task of civil society. to ensure the selection of personnel, a and their training in structuring so that, uh, our highest body of the clan power can be safe from some kind of shock. well, as the head of state emphasized, this is exactly the platform where fateful solutions for our country. we have come to, uh, to a new understanding of these consciousnesses. what is democracy for us in reality, that is, we have ceased to be guided by some theses, first of all, we adopted the constitution, which we have already said more than once, and

today it is vns, when the people finally begin to understand, that is, we are trying to explain to our citizens that democracy is just a concern, not going out to the square with slogans is not clear about what, but this is a concern for our future of our children, and our life is a joint decision. global problems and how since this is today's reform of the management system in the republic of belarus, when the president refused a detachment of powers and handed it over to various representatives of the people for discussion. this is our path, from which they will also take an example. oh, very very very soon, as from the constitution that democracy is the worst way to govern, but no one has come up with a better one, uh, but this quote is not mine. this is churchill churchill said so, and so it is today. i could know, they say, sovereign democracy is such a democracy, but

it is not a way to control. this is a way of having the population in some kind of global plan, so that they obey you. you know, today i'm still, uh, closer to an authoritarian way of governing. this is the first and why more moment of transformation of society? society is still being transformed, and today the risks of the threat that confront us, our state. they require only an authoritarian style. they lose all the time that they are embraced by some incredible complexes. they are incredible they are incredible complexes some, it means that something really offends us all.