vegetable garden when we retired, we already went deeper here and from our apartment from the second floor. we come here every day, and here we work the earth the earth heals people, it heals us, if we bow to the earth, it will give us a return, we will get a good harvest and a person becomes healthier, cleaner, because they say, this is how the beauty of a flower begins a seed, and a person human beauty begins with the soul. and so, when we in this earth give this grain our beauty, our strength. we ourselves become more beautiful. us becomes easier. we are getting younger, and we don’t want to give up anything to obey this old age, and we hope that if we no longer have the strength to look after our husband here, what we have done here will be continued by our children and grandchildren. i know that they will support us in our endeavor. and this manor she will live and this house will live will live for us and children, grandchildren with laughter, light will be windows to dress this parenthood,

the most important thing.

peace and security are elementary things that simply must be in the life of every child , president alexander lukashenko said about this at a charity event as part of our action , more than 2,300 children were invited to the new year's holiday for children with the participation of the head of state, from all regions in belarus these are orphans and children left without parental care, pupils of cadet schools.

children, out of seven refugees, children from donbass, children of persons who died in the line of military duty, students of the winners of international republican regional olympiads, competitions, festivals and competitions. until mid-january, a new year's charity event takes place in belarus, our children officials. the highest officials of the country, heads of enterprises and public associations visit boarding schools, hospitals, large families and orphanages, family -type at the republican level in action. more than 20,000 children will take part. in general , about a million children will be covered by the events. 10% discount for socially important goods extended in belarus reducing the purchasing power of unprotected segments of the population by 10% cheaper than meat, bread, milk, vegetables and other goods from the

list, socially significant, only 29 items can be purchased by pensioners with many children and leaks and income per month is less than the subsistence minimum budget. the consulate general of russia was opened in grodno from the solemn ceremony held on the thirtieth anniversary of the establishment of relations between our countries of the region long-standing economic ties with russia half a year ago, the ninth forum was held in grodno regions in belarus, russia, where contracts were signed for a record amount. about a billion dollars, the opening of a diplomatic mission will help strengthen and develop a mutually beneficial partnership in the consulate building , work on technical equipment is being completed and for now all services will be provided in the format of on-site consular receptions. the consulate general, which is opening here, certainly creates additional conditions for communication between russia and the grodno region. 9,000 citizens of russia live here who have a view of residence in the republic of belarus and, of course,

the services that the consulate can provide are notary and services for issuing a passport for citizens. we will help them to resolve these issues in obtaining visas. promote inclusion, promote human rights action no double standards, the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities is designed to support athletes and reconsider the unfair decision of the international paralympic committee to be suspended from the olympic movement. for the cause, not only the sports community is more fifty videos from caring belarusians were received in the action in defense of our athletes, the public association also supported the basic principles of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, non- discrimination, equality of opportunity and accessibility. it was they who destroyed the decisions of the international paralympic committee. such an action demonstrates not only the unity of the athletes, but also of all our people, a daily theatrical show, a ball of new year's wishes. in the holiday program.

minsk musical action at the town hall takes place under the open sky on an unusual stage. she is an interactive christmas tree instead of fragile new year's toys, powerful spotlights. the color accompaniment gives the audience an incredible magical atmosphere. the keeper of the new year's secrets of the town hall tells how the upper city used to meet the winter holidays and was also included in the interactive map with the new year's quest. this year, minsk has developed a kind of guide for citizens and guests, which contains the most interesting and unusual places in the capital. the main thing is to choose the first location, coming to this location you will already meet you. you will say, i am a member of such an active map, respectively, and you will be given this card, the first mark will be that you have already visited this place out of 51 places. you need to visit, on january 23 to january 7, 23-23, how would we decide by voting by visiting the location, and you come to the main point of this sports palace, it will be written there in large letters. uh, what's the point?

where you show an interactive map and you can get an additional prize as a gift to yourself, this will be a gift of the first merch for the convenience of tourists, they launched an additional bus and a festive express train that will follow. on the route of the interactive map, skater marina zueva won the second gold at the russian championship in kemerovo at certain distances belorusskaya became the best in the race with a mass start, let us recall for the athlete - this is one of the crown distances earlier in russia zueva was the first and at a distance of 3.000 m everything in the medal piggy bank our country at the championship of russia six awards. socio-political

talk show in essence today we will talk about unions that our country has joined, which it plans to join, and what we can expect from them is all. we will discuss against the backdrop of the presence of our president in st. petersburg at an informal cis summit, my colleague. alena surova works there today. we are waiting for a live broadcast. well, if you want to join the discussion of our program. this is where the qr code comes in. subscribe and you can send messages with you kirill kazakov we are starting. almost the entire time of the existence of the soviet union, the word union is associated with the end of december months, because on december 30, 1922, an agreement was signed on the creation of the ussr, we 'll talk about this a little later. now we are talking about what we have this year. well, maybe from our journalistic point of view

, activity has never been noticeable. as a matter of fact, the presence of the belarusian authorities in the sco. uh, revitalization of work in the cis revitalization of work in the union state, which is probably connected primarily with sanctions. this is military relations, allied relations with russia, which, well, in principle, are taking place against the backdrop of the escalation that is observed on polish lithuanian on the ukrainian side. in general, all this suggests that belarus is becoming a part of the geopolitical eastern european piece of land where we really play a very important role. i am alone today. because, uh , an informal summit of the cis heads of state is taking place in st. petersburg, and they are taking part there, she is president alexander grigoryevich lukashenko and works there, and my colleague alena surova, we, uh, literally contacted her a few minutes before the program in order to discuss, how did this summit go, what are your impressions alena? well, let's probably give

you some time, because i understand that you need to prepare in order to make an evening story, so what happened. well, let's say, this is the entourage, because what i think is in telegram channels. first of all, it is an impression. first of all, these are the remarks of alexander lukashenko that the next year will be happy and successful, what did you hear there? well, actually, first of all, hello everyone, of course, you are all very welcome. see. that is, here, and remotely. and i want to note that this informal cis itself has really not become rich in official statements. well, as they say in the classics of the genre, but in fact the heads of state climbed the steps of the medical library, almost all in silence. the princes did not even look to the side and it seemed that in some very calm and concentrated mood

, representatives with children expecting m- we became alexander lukashenko, my colleagues asked such questions, well, moody, or something, he really spoke about his expectations for this year, but intentionally or not, e, to the question of what mood he was in, he answered hmm o that the middle one, of course, added that there is something to strive for, but, well, in fact, it seems to me that there is something more here, because , nevertheless, the meeting, albeit informal, but the agenda is very serious, there are a lot of questions, that need to be discussed. and enjoying on occasion, of course, i would like to ask our experts a question that you know collectively from all my colleagues, and many russian and other commonwealth countries are asking, but the question is, mm, if the heads of state are really in close contact. if there is no problem at any time to assemble

a formal official website, then why do we need unofficial ones, especially since this is the second one in a year, the previous one was in st. petersburg just a couple of months ago peter what do you say, well, firstly, let's remind to our viewers that there are different formats. there are official ones. you are where the agenda is clearly prepared, the delegation is present, specific issues are discussed, specific decisions are made. if we are talking about an informal summit, then this is, first of all, consultations of the leaders of states on some issues, summing up the results, informal communication in many respects, which is why there were no statements about any official press conferences. e is a certain exchange of opinions of moods between now, if a specific case between e main member states of the commonwealth

of independent states. here. uh, what is the fundamental difference and the fact that every year at the end of each year we traditionally have such an informal cis summit that speaks of the mutual interest of the heads of state, on the one hand, and on the other hand, that despite various kinds of criticism, the commonwealth exists lives and implements specific programs that benefit all participating countries. song that's what you think about total thank you really very limited time, so, i’ll probably take my leave and go get ready for my evening broadcast. uh, prepare the material. hmm, i will definitely watch and listen to you. good luck, we are waiting for your interesting report right after our program. but, and we will continue to sing. so i started asking a question after all, following the results of this summit, you should not wait for the signing of documents, right, because, well, no matter how they should be, in theory, because only at official

events a document is being prepared, accepted and signed here, just a protocol is not required and no such formats and actions. but are such summits resolved economic issues? or, it’s also, well, some kind of humanitarian, social agenda, when you arrive without papers, it’s possible that it’s impossible to compare some numbers there to see fewer assistants. i would like to say all possible help to peter first, too. position on the status of the need here are informal summits, here, on the background, the background picture showed 54, so to speak , all the leaders of states, yes, which were accepted and pay attention to one of the pictures was the first person of azerbaijan stood next to the first person, yes, armenia, that is, pashinyan and aliyev, even for the sake of this format, these meetings are probably rational. now the answer to your question. well, unfortunately, although time, so to speak, reduces e in different ways, remember a

couple of years ago. we said that the union state is already in oblivion, and the europeans have also fallen. will replace him. just the same today, unfortunately, uh, the cis has turned into rather such a large informal platform for communication of top officials, therefore, yes, there is a free trade zone of the cis it does not function, because some members have suspended their membership, so wait for some breakthrough solutions in the field. nomics, unfortunately, here's the word, unfortunately, i'll repeat, i probably don't have to, if it can be. remember, we had a program dedicated to the cis a few months ago and we talked. and then, all of a sudden, well, it’s not that it was a discovery for me for many viewers, including after a word on the comments on our youtube channel it was that but it turns out that the cis structure, which has existed for a long time since ninety the first year and signed documents from the ninety-first year, including mutual ones, they were ratified and they served,

for example, as an impetus for some agreements to be concluded, then in different integration tracks, for example, in a union state in the european union that is, you can needless to say that the cis well, let's just say that it has laid the legal basis for this multi-stage process, that is, let's remember the goal of the cis mission. the cis is such an integration project after reintegration is it a divorce union, right? this is the story of the first union, which was built on collapse on the ruins of the soviet union therefore, yes, that is, you are completely right, and but here i again have a special mission, belarus emphasized that the headquarters, after all, is still in minsk even for this, in principle , also needs to be supported, in general, personal communication between the leaders of states, from my point of view, is very extremely important. it is not in vain that putin constantly meets lukashenka in a different format. yes, personal relations, unfortunately, this is what was the basis of a big conflict with

ukraine, yes, that is, personal relationships have ceased conflicts of zelensky lukashenko putin well , as a result, we got what turned out to be 90 sailors, look last week there was a meeting of our presidents here in minsk putin lukashenko and again, if the western press thinks so, it seems that putin supposedly came to his land, almost a province of the russian federation where lukashenka met him as a vassal, there were a lot. thrown that putin i'm going down the ladder with absolutely no one to say hello. although it was an absolutely normal meeting of the two presidents. they are we were driving together in the same car and talking, and here our belarusian russian experts note that this does not look like a relationship between a subordinate and a person who came to point something out, because well, if, for example, you are sitting somewhere in london in a corporation and you get bananas, then you should snap your fingers there beads back bananas. and in principle, nothing else

is needed, but here this is a constructive conversation, because there are a lot of questions and they need to be discussed very, very subtly. here's how a person who works in the apparatus with his the debt of the state. is it really such a package of issues that needs just personal meetings of the presidents. well, first of all , it’s worth saying that fakes always pay money to someone. they are consistently doing this, therefore they have been and will be because, if the union state. previously, they simply denied, let's take the same auto-democracy in belarus, they did not recognize it, but now they began to fear it and be afraid, because a strong union state is being formed, an agreement is being implemented and look how often there were personal meetings of our presidents to resolve issues. if we analyze the meeting that took place there, even our president. eh, vladimir vladimirovich putin also noted that there are issues that cannot be resolved only at the government level. but all the same, we all act within

the framework of our legislation, so there are issues that the presidents should decide. and they should solve them promptly and it's worth saying that pay attention, because hmm in politics. no, there are friends in politics interests. yes, and here, too, our mutually beneficial partnership. it is definitely mutually beneficial, because, of course, our borders. here thank you for the support of the regional grouping of troops in what we have today, our joint approaches, therefore, but on the other hand. look at the economy, because vladimir vladimirovich noted the priorities. now the nearest development is machine tool building, microelectronics, which belarus has preserved, therefore it is beneficial for both russia and belarus, and since power is gaining momentum. here, well, here, georgy vasilyevich, we we rarely see you. well, you said again, here is the union state. danika is not there, the potential is huge and the potential will only increase and be realized. that's the problem. he became a driver because there were concrete results, see

the presidents repeatedly discussed and as they explained to journalists, these are strategic issues. yes, that is, this is no longer a tactic, for example, of the last year, when, after starting with in, it was necessary to understand, yes, how will the unions interact? yes allies interact, but here is still a strategic question. well, as it were, journalists may get the impression that, and the union state, in theory, should switch to some kind. the other level, yes, is either deeper integration or geographic expansion. so i have this other level, yes for understanding. this is where it goes. here is some kind of merger with the euro-zes, or is it generally just completely different integration tracks fashionable to say. yes, it means, firstly, on december 8, 1999, adopted agreement on the creation of a union state those 28 union programs that they adopted in the development of the implementation of the agreement. naturally.

why do presidents say today that 60% of all measures have already been completed, that is, we are moving forward. let us complete this construction, then they always say that after all, the union is a union of those countries that are interested in developing and respecting the sovereignty of their partners. therefore, such a desire will be considered further expansion, but let's first do one thing let's bring it over here and uh, it should be noted that? this can also be called a pilot project, because the development of all the main strategic areas that are now going on by leaps and bounds, then it can be extrapolated further to our same npp, andrey petrovich mariana kiddimovna. she said that well, they seem to be afraid of us, she took the phrase out of context, but i liked it very much. yes, because in terms of the military last week, peter, you and i had an interview on the radio, we you just discussed the topic. here is what the president said, that we will have aircraft

that can carry special weapons. what kind of special we did not decipher, but how could one think of the fact that it could be nuclear so afraid of us. well, you know that's before you start answering e to this question. i would like to return to the beginning of the program again, what kind of an informal summit is it that we are having today in st. petersburg and indeed, it’s just how the thesis was thrown today that it’s just like that. an event that well is held annually and in fact something is different. you know how there are always somewhere some kind of reconnaissance signs by which you can determine what is really happening. if we look in the chronology of events, we can first of all notice the holding of an extended military colleague, which is followed by the supreme commanders of the armed forces of the russian federation, vladimir vladimirovich putin. this is followed by an event. related dmitry medvedev

travels to china meets with xingpin's some very important and important aspect. the only thing is that the message is special, even unconditionally. they say russian military transport planes are landing in china, and they are bringing something from there. but this is already conspiracy theories under the telegram channel at home, we are talking about intelligence, so that we can determine something. the next event is coming here, a very large delegation from the russian federation, headed by the president. of the russian federation, vladimir vladimirovich putin, and global issues are also being resolved by the statement of our president just that we have the latest weapons systems are emerging that allow us to adequately respond and respond to everything that is happening today on our western and southern borders. what can be said here are they afraid of us or not? well, first of all, i want to emphasize once again we are reacting, we are reacting while the country is reacting

it is not a secret for anyone that today a new concept of nato nato 2022 has been adopted, where everything is scheduled up to 20 until 2030, that is, what awaits us the main the message is definitely there, the target setting. this is collective defense within such key tasks. first of all, it is defense and deterrence. i think it's clear who the second message is on the western frontiers. this is primarily related to the overall security of our partners. you can also see who is involved in partnerships and, accordingly , crisis management of what is happening around, that is, by and large, if we look at this document at all. uh, then we will clearly define from this that russia is named as the main strategic adversary. this is a key word, china is only designated as a hybrid threat, by the way, once this doctrine also says about belarus about

human rights. here, too, in a message together with the russian federation. therefore, in this doctrine, first of all, it says. yes, there, then it says climate threats and everything else and the fight against terrorism. and suddenly, by chance or not by chance, such a serious document is adopted, yes, at the sowing level, where the russian federation is designated as a state that is actually a sponsor of terrorism. that is, if we look at this whole doctrine, it is all directed at the russian federation, well, and, accordingly, on us as a union state, how we should react in this situation. do you want peace prepare for war? it may already look today, how commonplace. e, as a banal message, yes, in fact, today it is an unconditional argument in order to respond quite adequately. well, look, our union of russia is clear and obvious. indeed, we are already working on the practice of border guard exercises and assistance in some humanitarian

issues, which, as far as our president is concerned, does not open this, as regards the csd. we have the example of kazakhstan, where we worked well in january of this year, the sco, whatever one may say, is in any case originally an organization that was created by the security forces. here, and what kind of prospect do we have, because i understand that belarus is not exactly an asian organization, however. so, going back, we are talking about the fact that this summit has gathered today with only one goal - to really synchronize the clock. who is ready for what in this situation, so that we clearly understand who is our enemy, who is our friend, all these members to one degree or another, yes, and here i agree with the message. what has become today, by and large, the cis is a club of old acquaintances, where some kind of, well, gentlemen 's agreements are decided, and they are concluded, as a rule, on the border. uh, state-owned, not based on that precisely not based on the organization. that's who wanted one, of course, who was worried

about defense and security issues, left, respectively, for the csto and the sco. whom the wave was more worried about integration in matters of the economy. well, look at this for yourself, these really noted pashinyan aliyev and putin yes. that is, roughly speaking, now this state is nearby. yes, there is also the issue of a corridor between karabakh. less where are the azerbaijani ecologists now, after all, he, too, may decide at this summit, or at least there may be formal communications, a colleague is right, i completely do not need to underestimate. this is informal communication. sometimes it is solved under the carpet on questions k. but this is also very significant and often all important, many important questions. they decide, just saying that everyone understands the alarming situation. that is, just like that, no one rides there will be a pilot project for eight programs, and then we'll see no, categorically not, when

28 programs were signed at the end of last year, after all, such a rubicon - it was february 24th. special operation. although the russian commander-in-chief is already specifically talking about the front. specifically, the war says, that is, it is actually recognized at a high level that these military operations are necessary, and to intensify and would not poke at them is necessary. here you are talking about strategic priorities. it seems to me that today there is a strategic parity. i am would single out two vectors. the first vector is technological independence - this is very serious and the second is reorientation. here is insider information that dmitry medvedev brought densalpin, by the way, today there was information in china. i do not speak chinese very well. so it's like the second factor. this is what become it today. i heard on the news that there will be an undefined format for the

meeting with this pin and vladimir putin and the second strategic tension. this is a reorientation of the vector of the union state russia belarus to the east. here is the highway and so on. here is the strategy. well, in principle, i say, within the framework of this country, it is necessary to build new relations this year. in principle, we proceeded according to this logic, and so we say march, the complete intensification of allied programs ahead of time. we are not switching from dollars to the national currency process, yes, and the second moment is the application to the shanghai cooperation organization, which by the way cannot be limited only to security issues and the educational industry is busy. that is, to a large extent sco - this is the osce and the bologna process and so on, but the collective east

is why, well, you know, i also want to draw attention to one point. i just gave an example that a leader is not needed. i am very glad that you are discussing several blocks without me. just in nominal order. first, these 28 allied programs. they are not finalizing new programs, including, apart from that. note also taught important meetings. e, secretary of state of the union state dmitry fedorovich mezen. met with vladimir vladimirovich president putin, and he reported to him primarily on the programs of the union state, which are being implemented at the expense of the union budget. this space is very safe. please note that this year, in my opinion, in february, we are planning to open a representative office of the kurchatov institute, an agreement between the academy and sciences of our kurchatov institute. well, this is also a great achievement, when the laboratory will already be written here to plan intuitively. i feel i'm just,

so to speak, sure you need more intensification is more applied. we need results not in 1925 or 1930, but we need results already today, so it should really be, in my opinion, and lukashenka said, a mobilization economy. and putin spoke. it is necessary to move to other channels; it transfers to the migration channel. let's. i will add you third to this. tell me, please, these are all our uh, union program, whatever it is called a union. yes, i have already said that the union , in the understanding of some residents of the former ussr the scoop is a very unpleasant thing. although i am completely different about it. at the same time, the european union is also a good one. but everywhere, here and there, the csto economy was in its original format. despite the fact that this is a military union, the economy there is the sco, the economy. there is a union of belarus and russia, too, the economy and the eurozone economy. so after all,

maybe the economy really should be. well, the same coal and steel union, which became the prototype of the eu, is also the economy of the european union and of course the economy underlies everything, and when you said that we are there in one grouping in the second there in the third and so on. do not forget very often confused, and the various groupings and levels that go through one or another grouping. today we are at the level when an economic union is being formed. that is, i am an economic union, and we started with what free trade zones are about, and now they said that the cis is not completely all countries. the new zone is such a witch, and first the union commission customs further along the perimeter. uh, groupings a unified customs duty is established , and then it is agreed

that not only goods will move freely, but labor force will move freely. recognition of diplomas. we are already doing this. in this direction, a lot has already been done and the free movement of capital. this is the economic union. that is, these are not different groups, so that people understand when we say that we are joining the sco. what a larger group. that is, here we are, as it were, appeared hmm e in pioneers in the union state, namely, and in the field of the economy, when we united , we showed how it is possible to unite and for a very long time the issue was discussed and the grouping stalled. i'm with why because they spoke? how can you talk about the energy market, and even you do not have it in the union. so what does he say, yes, the president was already optimistic at the press conference that the formation of a single energy market was correct, and that's when they agreed, when they signed an agreement on a single

energy market. i think what we would no matter what, this is a very big breakthrough. a lot of people still don't understand. first of all, these jobs are creation. here we are what saved the industry. yes, of course. it 's good, machine tool building instrument making to one degree or another. worse. it's better to argue here. uh, it means, well, we have kept it, but for this we need markets, if you are not allowed in the market or if you have, uh, in terms of energy costs, you lose to your own, so to speak, well, not a fellow from the same member of this group, then, well, where good, what grouping and here in this case, when i say that this is a pioneer organization. that is, as it were, well, it sets an example for and here is the fact that we have united in the energy sector. this means that we have shown that it can also happen in the eaeu. irina vasilievna remind vladimir ilyich's phrase, politics

is the concentration of the economy, the concentrated expression. yes, and integration in the military sphere, for sure. this is also one of the highest forms of integration, because, well, in fact, trust in foreign troops on your territory. well, basically, it's serious agreement between the two leaders. explain to me from the point of view of the military from the point of view of the person involved. that's it with an international theme. why is it good when the american troops are in bialystok, and when the russians are under the bush - it's bad . that is why, well, it is extremely important, uh, we note that we have a single defense space between the republic of belarus of the russian federation. we have a unified military doctrine of an allied state and grouping of troops, which operate both on the territory of the republic of belarus and on the territory of the russian

federation, let’s say, according to a single plan within the framework of unified programs and plans , so, and those groups that operate on the territory of neighboring states in close proximity to the state border with the republic, belarus and often, uh, acts in the interests, and observance of certain political goals, if we put in the blood of the corner the issues of ensuring the national security of specific extremist comrades, it is written, and bathe. well, what's not clear? look at russian technology. here in minsk, for example, an armored personnel carrier there or some kind of uaz with krasnodar black russian numbers, the occupiers. but if they have it there, well, well, within the framework of international organizations, as well as collective security treaty organizations within the framework of the highway of belarusian technology. e, it acts on various countries wide geography,

including over 1,000 km, but this does not mean that the republic of belarus has occupied any other country, well, the question then. look here accepts yes the us defense budget accepts nearly $860 billion. yes next year, well 23 2 billion dollars do not poke bases everywhere in the open. they say, how much money is sent to ukraine, yes, that is, everything is fine. it works out in the open and is considered absolutely normal. we do not criticize any international organizations. we never heard. yes. here is a very important point when we compare different. union, then we must understand that if the military-political economic components of any union do not correspond to each other friend, this means that this union is not always sovereign, for example, the european union. why let's see the european union, it was profitable for him to buy russian energy resources and sell his products on the territory of our union. in general

, remember there was a concept of even integration integration, which was very profitable. it would seem that. why the european union has laid this thought the answer is very simple. these are the american military bases that are located on the territory of the european union, these are the bases that remained from the second world war, in fact, the occupying forces and mr. scholz, if he is somewhere a rypnitsa, they will immediately explain to him very easily and quickly that expensive salt and your european union are secondary compared to the euro-atlantic ones. union in contrast to their euro-atlantic community here. we have the eurasian union, the union state of shanghai, the organization of cooperation, they work in one of the paths. there are no fundamental systemic contradictions here, which, for example, exist between france and the united states, which grow

simply from their geographical contradictions here we have no such contradictions, it is profitable for belarus to sell its products to the russian federation and buy from there. e, the corresponding energy carriers jointly-scientifically and technically organize all this, that is, military-political and economic cooperation they are joint. who watched, in general, we are talking about unions today and we discussed how they actually watch us in the whole union with the help of youtube although when, uh, before the collapse of the union , belarusian television probably wanted to only dream for the soviet union to watch everything that is produced in minsk, i said at the beginning of the program that this week the centenary of the soviet union is being celebrated and a lot has gone now there are such statements by experts that a union state is union 2.0,

possibly a union with china this is union 2.0 i'm wondering, in fact, can a second union appear at all. tell me, as a deputy, as a person who passes the law. here, can when it is as i understand that you are a convicted person of a certain kind powers and competencies. you can't say this from the point of view of a person who makes decisions at the legislative level, but still. the union is how the union existed, it can have the possibility of reincarnation. i'm sure it is. in the sense and in the form that was unlikely, but i am absolutely convinced that in order for us to our countries to survive in these conditions and maintain our independence, sovereignty is a necessity that has matured and now, which da kalino was shaky, is moving in this direction, these are all countries and here. what

currently taking place in st. petersburg. i think this is one of the small steps in this direction, definitely. is it possible with those with the level of contradictions that exist, well, between russia and belarus , of course, the economy there has liberal approaches in some parts of the russian federation, but the same one, armenia azerbaijan is the same conditional, kyrgyzstan and uzbekistan well, here’s how i think that's why the shape will be a little different. uh, completely different, but look at the contradiction we had with the russian federation. how long has it been since the nineties, the mid-nineties, and so far we have established such a level of trust, such a level of integration, about the same 208 programs, let me return to the fact that after all this is an alliance of sovereign states with their own state system. we have different economies. well, we have a goal. yes, this is an increase in the level and quality of life of

security and and so kirill i allow myself to return. before advertising, they discussed that this is not the union, so we saw what was the european union. this is not the union because there is a puppeteer yes, and as the united states of america says, so everyone does. please remember at least one case when the president of belarus or the president of russia set conditions, there was never such a thing moreover, what is a union, our understanding is when our president said that when we will stand back to back and shoot back. if we are attacked this is an alliance, because apart from the economy. we also have the spirit of tradition. well, that's right. yes, maryana was not even in vain, not in vain, asked to remember the ninety-first year. that's how i remember, when in march of the ninety-first year it was accepted. well, a referendum was held on conservation. union there were reservations that few people read, because the question is, how did you sound for the union or against, and it is written there. it had to be reformed to be more independent and so

on and so forth. and when this whole thing came to december, the ninety-first year, already in the cis format, the creation. yes, it was already a union of independent states, everyone already came with their flags, which now exist. they have already endowed declarations of independence with the status of state laws. that is, we, in principle, also came to actually blow the country, which is associated with the soviet union was only still the soviet ruble. everything, nothing more, and then he made a reservation that the creation of a certain union, after all, from gorbachev, during december. waiting for some decisions and so on. oh, maybe it will be. here is the union of independent sovereign states, and so it is generally possible. the union of independent states, or the union is an alliance, with some kind of national body with the adoption of some kind of decision. again, we are confusing what you are saying, it's all right, the levels must have passed the first level, which was correctly said georgy vasilyevich that in the cis its formation of the consciousness of a free trade zone has not yet ended. this is the most primitive

very first level. now, if the cis passes and wants to create a common customs union, then what was created in the eaeu, that is, along the perimeter of a single, e, customs vulgarity, but this needs to be abandoned a little, but from its modern sovereignty. let's be honest and clear. here is the reincarnation of the soviet union , where there was a single, ruling party, where there was a single assistant. why will there never be everything point yes the second question is what we want create? it's a matter of first defining what we want to create. unfortunately, today, on the weekly format, what we want to create is also not there, state unions have one format and one goal, euroses, others shost, a third, and so on and so forth, so you first need to decide, well, as it were with a goal, and then to this goals are lined up. you can put a remark , you know, i actually thought about what unites all these unions. and probably nothing.

and who ah? be that as it may, alexander grigoryevich lukashenko was at the forefront of ideas and sources the creation of the first commonwealth with belarus , russia, then the union, he, well, how the locomotive drags on itself. forgive the cis and rightly so. he says that the capital here in minsk is somehow pushing the eurasec. constantly , in every one of you, he is at a press conference and on his feet behind a press conference, the same thing is happening today at the same informal cis countries where he joked and said he wished you a good mood and promised that the year would be successful. right here in this. right here in this thing. could it be, so if it's still an idea president about the establishment? as you say, but some kind of education, we will understand, it will be voiced, and it is also possible to be implemented. but once again, let's say that there is ordinary

psychology. a person, especially of such a level, in principle, if someone is one of the leaders, no matter what he is, there is a super-duper cool person who starts generating an idea at the mental level, there should be rejection, there should be an understanding of the general understanding. and from this point of view. you say what unites unites in the same way as the european union was created. i've read the classics, which stood at the origins the european union is the instinct of self-preservation then it was a threat to the soviet union and today there are other threats. and so, until we reach this level, everyone will feel and understand that it will not be necessary to unite before that. here are the sanctions brought you see this, but it seems to me that international injectors dictate in order to be forced. it seems to me that any union should support the military, you know, that is, if there is military support, i look at the

word to the military. national speech is spelled out in the treaty on the union state and after all, today, when some decisions are made, if you are higher than the state council, which is headed by alexander grigoryevich lukashenko, there is the council of ministers of the union state. that is, it's all perspective. as they say, we'll wait and see. we have to work. andrey petrovich dkb - is this the army of the cis or the army, evraz? or, in principle, it is very confusing to understand. trust me, people who watch tv read the press and don't go into details. they are really very sometimes confused by the number of unions that we take part in, we talk, that is, for us, an alliance with russia well, of course, soviet kazakhstan well, this is something too, of course. here are cabaits, sort of like an army. we are leaders everywhere. we are everywhere our president speaks everywhere, i understand, the interests of the state. well , from a people's point of view. here is where the understanding

is. well, i'll start. probably the very first very beginning. there, where the union is recognized, it will support the military there or not. but this is, as it were , said, on the one hand, absolutely. correctly? let's go back, that is enough, the army should stand outside politics is a classic. this is a tool. we cannot say that the army is an instrument of politics. i agree. without this, there is no way, but the one who relies on and skillfully uses this tool has a much greater chance of success, because a kind word, or rather, a kind word and colt is much more than a simple word correctly agreed, the army is working. well, yes, the power of the monopoly of the state, if we return back to the soviet union, how the soviet union was formed let's remember with you. that is, it was the bolsheviks who came and established the soviet power over certain areas. before that, there was another deniki kalchik against wrangel, then foreign intervention, and so on and so forth, that is, what happened in this

situation has changed. the balance of power, based on the fact that the balance of power has changed and a certain space has been created in which this balance of power has established its power, respectively. today we are with you. if indeed, we will measure the past by standards. that is, what was before february 24, then of course, there is integration there is no integration there is politics and there we will never create anything nothing. look at how nato operates today in a coordinated and concentrated manner, you understand the supply of weapons and that's it. the rest is due to which, in principle, everything continues, if we are talking about whether there will be an alliance or not, again, this will depend on how the special military operation goes. how the whole trend will change in our theaters of operations of military geographic regions. and what will be the balance of power and then blocs will be created, the state formation of a new one, that is,

that's all. goes ahead and we most likely we'll get tired of witnessing, but in the next decade, because if we look at all the concepts, all the strategies that exist they are made until 2030, where the road map is almost clearly defined, who will act in these conditions, as regards directly e forces of collective forces and peacekeeping forces into the forces that we have in the csto. well, definitely. this is not the armed forces, utkb, that is, this is the structure that allows us to act at the international level against the extremism of the terrorism of separatism, that is those aspects that really got to us today and we got that's it from the past. yes, that is, because of yesterday, of course, these moments. we need to largely rebuild what was in kazakhstan. this is largely an undoubted success in road accidents, i have no doubt.

that is, the political will of this particular organization militarily was demonstrated once the only time. well, i hope it’s not the last one, it seems in armenia that they are trying to take advantage of this and lose. let's already. yes, not a little i would agree, for some reason that no matter how we twist the times of the blocks. these are so tough, when, for example, some turkey would be at the same time a member of nato and a member of the warsaw pact, the dagan, in fact, sits on two chairs, well, everyone understands. this is the point, the imbalance of power is such that the world is neither bipolar nor unipolar, for example. the same hungary conducts nato. oh, what an independent policy or, for example, armenia, which is a member of the csto and which has the largest

number on its territory? who, uh, in all of the caucasus, azerbaijan, which is an ally of turkey, but at the same time, good relations between the leaders of azerbaijan and belarus give us a special attitude, i mean what, now this geopolitics is being formed according to the network principle, in many respects a hybrid principle, including through color revolutions, including through multi-stage unions and bridges. why is it happening now is there a transitional period? i think that after all, even a non-multipolar world here will be too expensive a pleasure. many poles it will have two two and a half poles three maybe, but a more rigid system will be built and this system is those countries that are there and yours and ours and all. yes , they are just looking for themselves and they are sold by and large, where they can be the same erdogan goes to the nato summit and to the summit of the jackalist organization to sell oil. yes

, i do. can i join the sco, yes? that is, everything here is very, very subtle, and we must be prepared for the most unexpected support. it is such focus points that are very important here, here is the csto. he is extremely important today, as he will later transforms who you are friends with another, but now you need to support his capacity. show effectiveness, if it weren't for our relationship between the ministry of defense and foreign military departments. after that, they changed strong stupid questions. i understand, but still . i exclude an ally in russia. i would like to speak in dry facts of figures that international military cooperation. well , let's call before february 24 of the current year and after e in terms of quantitative indicators and qualities, well, they have not changed, that is, we have, taking into account instructions. uh, the heads of state of the state administration bodies have changed certain vectors of cooperation and

the effectiveness of this cooperation is quite significant, and an example can be cooperation with the strange shanghai cooperation organization, given that an attack application has been submitted to the organization. it has a military component and, uh, talking about the military component of the shanghai organization, cooperation is extremely important, because if we take fuel from ten armed forces in the world, then only there are five members of the shanghai cooperation organization in this ten, and as part of the implementation of cooperation with these countries, we are finding new relations with nato, didn’t they suspend this project unilaterally, they suspended, but the republic of belarus has always, for example, even watched in the news that the military attachés who brought the borders appeared, look how we have the policy of the republic of belarus well, let's just say that the foreign policy of the republic is indulging in the context of international cooperation, then

that we are always open for dialogue. we invite everyone, without exception, to all events of the military states and is shown as it is. in particular, when there were speculations about the situation in the border areas with ukraine, all the military were brought there, credits at the mission, the cathedral showed a real picture of foreign military diplomats, there was an opportunity to talk with the fighters and with the heads of the military command and control level. here is how the commander of special operations forces other officials without restrictions. please look people descended into the trenches looked at this question do not answer, because you are posts, and petya will be able to sing. look, when they arrived, they heard, they saw, perhaps even ours were told everything is fine here, what they wrote. they wrote it themselves, because they are outside the relevant state, which is interested in a completely different interpretation of certain events. we are geopolitical opponents for them, and if you show them, don't show them, though.

that's all the correct diplomatic tone. they will be treated in a way that suits them. this is what we should understand and not expect from them that they suddenly start to be friends with us, er, to demilitarize poland, too . uh, american military bases somewhere across the ocean. it will not happen. see question. today we talked about the fact that alliance in general the union is based on the economy, right? now here's a question from last week. do you remember that the allies of the united states voted on what the economy to vote on means against glorification, and the people who won nazism, or, as it says, we must now support yours, that is, the ideology, great britain is right there the former enemy country. and italy, japan, germany, ukraine, romania

, vote for the same allied relations, the banking sector of the us allies on the corresponding structure of the economy. and, of course, as an instrument of pressure, the economy must be understood, here is the question of a sovereign state and capital. that is, the same and the same european union, the same companies, let's see how they conduct, they withdraw funds. where are the businesses in the united states of america is independent of them, what these corporations think is not a nation. not by interests, but they actually use other states in their transnational interests, they don’t care today germany tomorrow the usa the day after tomorrow is still the third. i am a very interesting fact. at least, i remember it about the military blocs of the economy again. now information has passed that the secretary general of the international monetary fund is changing. who should have a bolt on it? of course, who only, well, what about it, it

seems to me, i'm serious when you look on our heads of the ministry of defense and military departments. well, this is at least, but a military man of the past school, who received an education with practical experience, even if at the training grounds and there is a mademoiselle, who, well, may have never even seen how you understand and assemble a machine gun. yeah well, how did we treat it? may i add here that the geopolitical interests of the contradiction were saying there, absolutely everything is correct. well, he always forgets that they won’t beat us, peter, for any reason, there are no resources, but in russia's resources and therefore alliances, so this is how or they look. how to divide russia and divide resources and appoint, if we consider ukraine in this case, how would it be, who will be the gauleiter, who will watch the wild jungle for these resources, and

they themselves drenched, so no one will know. and now look again, back to the union state since 2000, more than ten programs have been implemented to strengthen border security at the expense of the union budget to strengthen the infrastructure of military facilities and business facilities. that is, what is needed today. we didn't even think it would be useful. we have always believed that everything will be fine politics, only will contribute to prosperity. today this one came in handy more than ever, so here is another moment, after all. nobody is interested in us either, we need cheap resources and human resources. here's what they don't need. a high-tech country, they do not need our independent technologies , and so on. therefore, this innovation digitalization is technological independence. what are we going to? this should be mandatory condition of our development and our stability. and one moment. look, we're talking to you. uh, we're talking from

a position of strength. this is correct, because today if this is the situation, but we have diplomatic corps in every state. and today we must talk about the fact that today diplomats must take the right flights and resolve issues in the interests of the people, because people and governments are different articles. they did not become andrey petr andrey petrovich said, if the diplomats fail the military for sure, that question is not, the military error. look here. in the past, in this year 2022, we called the exercises allied determination, yes, and next year, the shield of the union whose union is therefore protected, even a little remembered such an old soviet joke, but on this occasion they ask a famous radio, tell me, dear radio, please, will world war iii there will be no war, well, there will be such a struggle for peace that there will be no stone left upon stone. yes, that's why here are more

soviet ones. come on, just really, here we come to the conclusion that a all alliances are built in search of resources. yes, indeed, we we also join unions. looking for resources. well , for example, some kind of trade relations, where to sell our products, which are made in order to make money, and in the end it turns out that this is a global system that has evolved over the past 30 years and let's say. so she was confessed by the owners of the company 40, and she is collapsing because the international monetary fund. here is a structure that has now shown that it does not work. and if it works, then only in one direction of the wto in the process through the prism of sanctions is this in general, this is in general structure that works. well, here's mw. we're glad you didn't join. oh, great, i mean. that's when to talk about it. work the other way. after all, all these organizations, i would also add the world

bank, the international monetary fund, the world health trade organization after the pandemic. all these organizations were created in the post-war period, as structures that support the processes of globalization, and therefore the usa is the creditor. if this global world is not closed, yes, yes, and therefore now the world is changing its configuration will be completely different and there will be no globalization, but it will go a different way. it will go through reggae analysis not through transnationalization. that's how peter said he transferred capital and that's it and no national interests. this is absolutely correct. so. uh, the current government in the united states, they consider them democrats, they consider transnationalizers. that is, they adhere to this concept, and

the republican party adheres to still more, because uh, trump came to power. this is what the word republic should america listen to. well, if you say that the americans will create an organization of alliances, with whom they will create an alliance. they tried to create a car there with canada and mexico, and they created it, but this is only the first stage, they are creating it. that's what we were talking about, the first level. this is a free trade zone. they do not set themselves the task of moving, as we do , to a second customs union, then creating economic ones, that is, they do not set any of this. it's enough for them that the american goods are sold by the colonial system , we don’t have time, so let’s sum up, and firstly, with the centenary of the soviet union, we were all born in this country, and therefore, there is probably something good in this, at least there was a second happy new year, which is like said the president should be happy lucky. and the most important thing is the unions of our

families. let's go like this. dad seemed to finish our families beautifully, health, good luck and happiness, it was essentially this year. we are no longer airing live . uranishne forest makes its way, the sun, quiet, so breathless, at least not to cut off this court, that the gates are great. millevich

this is a live panorama, and i will tell you the main events of thursday, december 29, sergey lugovsky hello information field. the news shook today. with a mark urgently over our territory, a ukrainian missile beaten by the air defense forces of belarus was recorded, our correspondents are already at the scene . looking forward to a live stream. the west is tired of financing the kiev regime a new eu program to support ukraine in france called complete nonsense and called