mounted by four people in total. the composition of the belarusian antarctic expedition was four people, the heroes will share impressive stories. we landed for the first time on the land of east antarctica on the coast of the cosmonauts sea and will tell you how to choose a business of a lifetime .

like a frenchman good evening, good exactly 22 years before my birthday on may 1 forty in the seventh year, an appeal was published by a group of soviet scientists, cultural workers, public figures with a proposal to create an all-union society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. yep, social science. here, let's get straight, but it's not outdated. today, firstly, marat sergeevich i look at you well with mathematics, and it is society that disseminates not only public political knowledge, but also scientifically. well, in a sense, naturally scientific. so we invite you. why not yet among our lecturers, but in fact, yes there were such conversations, even in soviet times and social science. it was on the one hand, recognizable on the other hand. as they say, youth has become memes. well, remember, we figured this in soviet comedies. but this

does not mean that it was something so bad or wrong, on the contrary. it was in great demand. i found social science lecturers when i was very young. i remember when they came to us and told us quite interesting things, but i 'm not talking about the library of social studies. imagine, here i am recently uh graduate students he asked, and how lecturers used to prepare, when there was no internet, and this is how the library of social science was, there were these amazing brochures, where information was summarized. yes. there, in different countries on various problems, and with this they really armed the facts with arguments, and the newspaper was not in vain. that was the name of arguments and facts, and who knows, yes, it was an official, absolutely official body of social science; by the way, it even went out in circulation in millions. yes, you all know, it's true again, so i invite you to become our lecturer. i don't reach. people are waiting for you. eh, but at the same time, in the nineties, they wanted to abandon the knowledge society, as well as other

soviet traditions, but life itself showed that it is necessary to come to people live, talk, explain, convey their point of view. look how synchronously the processes of the revival of social science are going on in our country and in russia, you can ask, but what about in other countries? uh-huh. it's just called differently. here are the traditions of educational clubs, communities, they are very common. in general, according to the structures within the framework of individual lands. germany has a structure. similar to social studies are called educational centers there. somehow, here we often represent classic english clubs, you know, these gentlemen sit and drink a cigar and smoke. e tea, er, whiskey, i probably don’t know, and then the nationalist hunts for nothing like that in fact, and classic english clubs are educational structures. i'm not talking about the fact that in the european tradition, and the enlightenment there, the organization of

various courses spoke in broad working masks. that's what it is. already the knowledge for many political parties, the topic is now very relevant for belarus, the development of political parties, and so, many political parties have appropriate educational or research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes, it created not only public leaders, yes, but even screens and heroes. yes , through the same outstanding actor balala yes , a favorite of women, yes, that is, there were the sixties , but knowledge in recent years has not had bright public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, they will not even name the head of the knowledge society of the soviet union or the belarusian republican and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? become a media conductor of knowledge well, in society well, i think that

several factors have converged here at once, but first of all, yes, the first part of your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, maybe the leaders. it is not necessary to know which academician, for example, headed social science, that academician vavilov stood for the foundation. there konstantin simonov is a famous poet, that is , this initiative came from them; it is important that the lecturer be known. the president himself was both a lecturer in social science and the secretary in charge then at school, that is, he organized this work. he understands that it is so important that we want to name the speakers, you want to name them, the lecturers are classical, and the people who come to the audience charge and what is called establish contact. these are the people we have appeared, we have them and we are actively inviting them as part of those events that we carry out. let's

take two of ours, probably, for the last year, the largest most basic actions by which we are recognized and by which we are proud, belarus 1 and belarus 1 in the pravda regime . it appeared e. well, somewhere spontaneously. that's just a big conversation with the president, where he raised the issue of the knowledge society. oh, and already in august-september on the eve of our first day of national unity on september 17th. we decided to drive through the regions and we saw that shpakovsky dermant is avdonin. i can list more. these are the people who are recognized, who are trusted, who are listened to and who are expected, that is, we can say that it is right to order them in a good way. yes, we work by order in a broad sense, according to the social order and specifically of certain organizations, and in fact often they order not some kind of lecture, but this or that person. here we are waiting. let him come to us, and we will continue to continue. borovik. petrovsky a. belyaev that's what

pleases me, journalists have appeared, who are waiting for a little light, a smooth tour indeed. and they know how to communicate with uh audience, their audience listens completely or not quite agrees to argue discusses. it is very important. look how many people like this we have . e in the deputy corps. and so you need to work with them for them. if you like, you need to create a platform matrix to offer a model of working methods, because we have also established even this year or two and the form of work, be it a dialogue platform. whether it's a lecture. it is necessary to change it is necessary to change the format of reporting information. let it be a little, but nevertheless, that is, this forum was like that shot. yes, it must be repeated, and in that form. eh, look here. here we have in february, and on the eve of the vote on the constitution, there was a large forum in the regime of truth in the sports palace, and on september 17th. eh, there was something similar

to e in well dedicated to history, this is our history in minsk on september 17 - this was carried out under the auspices of the ministry of culture. we partially participated there, but we saw that such formats are in demand among people . vladimir here. see. we are now talking about speakers. they exist and more or less professionally trained, but in the same ussr there was galina ulanova yes, a ballerina a ballerina. yes, it can now be called silver. yes, they would. but who do you see now as the headliner of the renewed society ? although i know that mine is not shared. yes, we are now working very actively with our big theatre. e with e.

ekaterina dulova about the interaction and forms of presenting information using musical theatrical methods, but i really like it, the way we worked. i also see that people are in demand on the stage of the kupala theater, when in august of this year our kupala patriotic forum was held. and we even interact with the national beauty school. we see, i’ll say it straight, even, perhaps, looking ahead. here is our famous merch of the first m-th all the slogans that are written, with which we go out, because behind each of these slogans there is an idea. behind each of these slogans there is a certain message, this appeal and it can be revealed, relying on it, you can convey this or that information. idea, it can be embodied in different forms, and we try these forms. and in working with the audience. you have an understanding, if we remember the social science of the soviet union, we

understand. there were 2,000 academicians, there were more than 200,000 doctors. yes, there were 400,000 engineers, yes, who took part in one way or another in the work of social science. we understand that in order to come to the same audience of cultural workers. yes , it is desirable that a person has certain knowledge in this area and speaks the same language with them. do you have such an understanding, ah, but this is if he talks about the topic of cultures, because we have cultural workers, i had to speak. eh, cultural workers, if you are talking about geopolitics or economics, you must first of all understand another issue. you correctly point out that when you communicate with people, you must understand who you are talking to. and speak to them in a language they understand and understand , although i will tell you. right now, on the eve of the seventy-fifth anniversary, we have organized such a lecture hall marathon on the basis of the academy of management, a series of lectures dedicated to the national idea of ​​the geopolitics of the economy, but to historical continuity. and

this is a very profound lecture. it's because, you know, we have sometimes. they want to follow the audience, they want to captivate simply, but it is important that there is knowledge and understanding of the arguments and we have organized such a series of lectures, and we see how people perceive them, we will continue this lecture hall . you have already mentioned that the president was an active lecturer in social science, and in 1978 it was he who became the responsible secret of the shklov regional organization. yes society here becoming the head of the republican. social science yes, you certainly raised the archives. yes, and interested. by this very fact, of course, i am grateful to our archive workers. we looked at the materials. and by the way, we also watched newspaper publications, because social science has always been active and the activity was reflected in the media as it is now. here. you, when you said that you had not heard anything for several years, but this communication was not organized. i'm not saying who's to

blame there knowledge or themselves. well, this fact is just very important to interact. by the way, when the society was created in the forty- seventh year, one of the tasks was the wide publication in the media , including, interestingly, the transcripts of the lecture. this is such a task that we can say that lecturer lukashenka was expected. uh, his information was trusted to the audience what we now know was always crowded, he was preparing for a lecture. this is very important. uh worked, relevant literature. this is what we see, and at that time i am convinced that the formation of the personality of our president is his a certain style. that time of work and the responsible secretary, the electric motor wife had more time than, uh, holding a full-time position in the knowledge society. so this had a big impact on him. ok then.

in 2007, by his decree, the president transformed the public association of knowledge into a republican state public association. come on, it's a status, and with your appointment in the twenty-first year. yes, in fact, he breathed new life into it. well let's talk straight. i do n’t bow before you, i say what it is, what i see is that i sincerely appreciate clairvoyance. president, he knows what will be needed in the future, and i'm not just talking about your organization. well, you must admit, what is anti-privatization alone worth, and state-owned enterprises and pandemics, when moisture did not drive us. when he really wanted to, and here's how you explain these things to yourself. this is some kind of special knowledge. well, firstly, with regard to the attention of the president to our society, my feelings and the decree was not only the seventh year, but also last year in november. they just supported us, but also set specific tasks and they are

promising, but also demanding, which we must do in the field of historical knowledge, political and scientific popularization of science. of course, we will fulfill the goals and tasks that have been set, but if we talk about the president, lukashenka, of course, this is a very big intuition. it's important, that we don't learn. this is an innate feeling. then a great worldly experience is huge. that's why the president always says you need to go from life, because there should be no artificiality, there should be desire. well you know, to indulge in something rational is necessary, which is characteristic of our belarusian nature of reasoning. a christmas tree, i'm like me, well, my being an anchor, beating, not only you axis alley. eh, where do you live? and this is a clear understanding that is peculiar to us, it is

inherent in the president, of course. this is a huge store of knowledge. certainly ah and trust in specialists, because look, during the same covid, there were always specialists next to the president. in this area. these are not some arbitrary decisions. they are based on a deep analysis of the information that specialists supply and only after that this or that decision is made. on tuesday, the president held an important meeting to bring individual laws in line with the updated constitution. these are two important documents. these laws obns on the entire belarusian people's assembly and law-political parties were considered. here are the main messages you heard for yourself, not debatable, but those that are necessary for deep reflection, understanding and

bringing to people. and now you must agree that your task is precisely this, when we discussed changes to the add-on. the constitution was just the same questions concerning the entire belarusian people's assembly were. uh, among the leaders in uh, discussion. yes, people asked, what is it for what is it already, when we held dialogue platforms in the fall. why is it necessary that the entire belarusian people's assembly was not asked if there was understanding, there is understanding, and the question arose only there, how to form it. eh, how will it be directly? yes, how will it work? here, as it seems, the main thing that the belarusian people's assembly needs is not lukashenka it it is not the presidential power that is needed, it is necessary for the country, for which, to ensure the stable development of society, to ensure continuity and as a vivid embodiment of the

true principle of democracy. unfortunately, the model of democracy that is offered to us, and more often imposed by the west, is a manipulative model, we see how it actually happens. this is the model of the oligarchy, which is a variety of cunning technologies. he is trying to explain to the people, but to create the illusion that the people are involved in the management of us. the entire belarusian people's assembly is really we lay down, er, the principle of our true sovereignty of the people, that we associate it with our traditions. this is no coincidence. here i will not even touch the evening. take the 20th century, our belarusian experience, all the belarusian congress of the seventeenth year. it was not a parliamentary form, but the people got together and claimed their right to live in their own land and determine how we live. take the people's assembly of western belarus in the thirty

-ninth year, thanks to which we were united in one state, it had great legitimacy, and we documents see this, any historian who has come across the history of the people's gathering of western belarus will confirm that it was a genuine people's representation in the ninety-sixth year in full swing. we remember the islands of constitutional political crisis. the people's assembly is all belarusian. the people's assembly played a huge role in the twentieth year in february. that is, it is already now we are investing our historical experience, including modern history, in a legislative form, that is, not something so illusory, but the fact that something already exists that already worked out and we are laying a certain perspective. yes, we are pioneers here, but there is no need to be afraid of this, since we still rely on our understanding of our political system. and how to ensure the main principle that the people should be

the source of power is good, but the main reproach that yes is thrown at the authorities is that labor collectives. they will not be represented practically in the composition of the vns, the president spoke very clearly about this, how you will bring it up. eh, i'll tell you that when we had discussions now. here's a reproach even inflatable. uh, that such a problem was not raised, people rather said how to take part, you just need to be able to explain it, because the majority there will be just representatives of the labor collective. here is a specific example. hmm, about a third is a deputy and, moreover, at all levels of the village councils and the president insisted that we preserve the village council in the constitution, this is the one, the first level, when a person encounters a representative of the authorities or vice versa takes on part of this power, becoming a deputy from the village advice before a

national assembly of the house of representatives of the soviet republic and this is not representatives of labor collectives. where do our deputies come from? we have deputies only in the house of representatives they work with a break from work, all the rest , look, these are doctors, teachers, businessmen. uh, these are people from this or that collective, well, let's take our main uh, civil society actors, who will send their representatives to the trade union. well, a trade union is the flesh of the flesh of labor collectives. this is basically labor collection of the belarusian republican youth union. and where we have young people in the audience and in labor collectives, they will also squirm, the same applies to the veterans of white russia of the women's union, these are the representatives of these collectives. and why do we have a question, when are public associations at all. if not they put forward with us the same director of the enterprise has quite a lot of worries about the economy and the provision of jobs for the

sale of products. i can list further. we are also the directorate and, uh, the team has a task, than an organization. here is the election. and why are there trade unions in this collective then, and why did they nominate their deputy from this collective either by collecting signatures or directly from the collective. this is their voice, their voice will be presented to the entire belarusian national assembly, so there is logic here. it seems obvious to me to emphasize one more point, president. e drew attention to it well, delegates. it is not just that all the belarusian people's assembly should participate. they are obliged then to come to their labor collectives and report back. that is, they must then work with them. that may be what we lacked before the constitutional referendum, and before this law we had e we were delegates, but now we have worked out all the belarusian people's gathered. let's be honest, let's go. here you took part once and that's it. no. now you are for the entire duration of the entire belarusian people's assembly. what makes it easier

, first of all, to be responsible to those who nominated you? it's not just you being present. communicated with like-minded people there 1 2 3 more days worked listened to the president asked questions discussed the program of social and economic development. you are responsible for the implementation of this decision and, moreover, the powers that we vest in the entire belarusian people's assembly. they are huge, in fact, such a collective body, uh, in the hands of which the fate of our country will be. including even in the most difficult situations, the political party is good, the second part of the second normative document, which was discussed here for myself clearly. which parties should remain. that's what we do a lot discussed this topic, yes, and we had different points of view. look here. let's compare with those countries. where did political parties come from, because in fact, they were reborn there of those parties that

we study in the course, classical political science, which were written about by scientists representatives of political science in the middle of the 20th century. well, they don't. well, take it any, but oh well, there is an american system, it is special. well, take the french parties, but where are those classical socialists, galist communists, new movements are now being created. uh, very fast dynamics of political life, everything changes, and we are often offered. no , let's go back. here we will create something to that scheme of the fifties. we must, firstly, look at the trends, and secondly, proceed from our own interests , the party should not divide society. it should represent the interests of a significant part of society, not necessarily all, but not to divide the party should not demand the overthrow of the constitutional order. it can and should criticize the authorities, if it is not the authorities itself, but not lead

the civil split of the party cannot be financed, and abroad the party cannot be the instrument of an individual oligarch or graphic group, and it cannot be bought by some big businessman. these are the key requirements, but the party must also have some kind of ideology. a party cannot be created just to take part in this or that electoral campaign. and this is a very serious demand that the party must represent the whole of society. er, well, not necessarily. that's right, all citizens. but if this is a party, it should also be in minsk it should be in vitebsk in all regions, except for the regional level. we have districts, but if not in all of them, well, at least in the third there should be structures, when a person comes out, he says, i am a representative of one party or another. we must understand. yes , there are at least 10 behind him, they have 20-30 thousand members of the party. here is such a program, we understand who we are dealing with, and if

the party was created in order to cut grants or satisfy someone's ambitions, why does the belarusian society need such a party and most most importantly, god forbid, if this happens, this is in the future a way of manipulating our political system, as a rule, from abroad. here are the clear barriers. you think that we have already got rid of random parties. here in your opinion, not yet, not yet, not yet. uh, let's wait for the adoption of the law, then, as i understand it, the procedure for re-registration of the party should go through, probably some parties will leave. even obviously there will be new parties. uh i don't know if we can talk about uh concrete examples here? well, i would still say, look how they showed themselves. the communist party works according to the norms, and many have tried to impose such an image. eh, this party is from the past. yes, this is it. where does it come from, only old people, well, there are old people.

well, look how many young sheets appeared in the bright recognizable liberal democratic party. how it works, yes, there are ambitions about white russia as well. well, let's see how the situation will develop. i see that there is. eh, some ideological ones. well, no matter how associations, but niches based on our constitutional system, which is not yet represented at the party level, which means that they may have appeared. i like your thought that was said. that's when we started discussing this block. eh, after all, it’s really not the vns, nor the party, the president does n’t really need them, they are personal. yes, he does not need them as portraits. indeed, in fact, the president has always communicated directly with the people, and this was his main distinguishing feature. here, in essence. we are talking about the fact that they should become the same parties, uniting on evs, uniting such a beginning for protection against external threats, as if the observance of the main principle is everything in the interests of one's state. now, if we

clearly understand this and convey this moment, probably, well, it seems to me, then the understanding will be correct. let's just say alexander lukashenko, he is the creator. here is that independent sovereign belarus as we know it. i think it's hard for anyone to argue with that. and now he understands. time is changing, and belarus is changing, and he wants to define it. uh, here is that political model, including model of social model of our development, which will remain for many years ahead, and we are interested in this. this is where the president's interest coincides with the public interest. uh-huh i got such an idea pushed. here, look, we have been talking for several years in a row, including as part of the work of lecturers, or speakers. eh, we already had a lecturer. i remember in the pravda mode i had a good conversation, people reacted well thanks to the people sitting here, including this, after all, this

was such a collective work in fact. here we are for several years we have been talking about the training manual ball, yes, and for 50 years it will not work in the following way. look, well, yes, and essentially 2020 . yes, he made a professional out of us, those who are already beginning to really understand what happened, how it happened and that we are not really unique in all this, but we turned out to be the only ones who turned out to be too tough for the smell, because it’s very warm for me. soul, perhaps, we are already in the knowledge society in our own methodological manual, and not anti-sharpa. yes, but on lukashenka’s manual there is such there is such request, and m-m it is necessary to do this obviously, i will share with you just an observation. that's from the twentieth year. well, in general, we spoke today in the belarusian character. there is such a character. we do not like to brag or show our own there , on the contrary, we will hide something somewhere. well, you know that there, uh, and the neighbors

did not envy, and so, well, just in case, so as not to climb. well, sometimes belarusians are not often treated like that, uh, and i noticed that there are a lot of colleagues in russia and even in foreign countries. although this explore this experience, but do it so carefully. inviting to some events or you come here, and not immediately, but gradually speaks. and how did it happen for you, what did you do, and why did they do it this way, and indeed, not only opponents, but also allies or potential allies are looking at us very seriously. this belarusian experience is very valuable. i think that we are already in lectures somewhere, talking at international conferences. e, including with statesmen of foreign countries expounded this experience. eh, well, it's probably time to generalize it and propose it in the form of some kind of

possible one. i just won't do research. don't just wake up stupid. i have emphasized one point all the time writing so far this information is hanging free encyclopedia. yes, like wikipedia that, in order to cope with that information war, the information struggle in the twentieth, flew here. yes, a few. which provided this informational victory, and in fact, when we understand that we did it ourselves. uh, this one is worth it more accessibility information. yes, i want to ask, you were the dean of the faculty, you know how to communicate with young people. here are our enemies. they didn't calm down. they very much count on the younger generation, which will have the right to vote before the electoral campaign. yes, and the right to choose. they need such new blood to replace the one that either figured out the situation or sat down, as they say, yes. here, are you going to

use the trendy internet platforms and tell in the same tik about the same genocide, continuing the previous question here in order to be successful, you don't have to try to be fashionable, but because there will only be an external form without a result, and you don't have to work according to the training manual. and there must be inspiration and there must be understanding. you know, like the military, they say you want to win, knowing the charter, but i'm not fighting according to the charter. here you must understand the algorithm of actions, what you must do, but if you speak only according to the charter, nothing will work. if you don’t know, the joint wo n’t work either, so we need to understand. this basis must be knowledge and feelings of the situation. well, we see how our president works. and as for the youth for 2 years. i’ll tell you, quite a lot has been honestly done, and we even see how the enemy reacts to this, uh, i won’t just

speak knowledge to my society. uh, we work very closely with the ministry of education. look, the anthem is being sung in schools , and very, uh, serious systematic work is underway in historical education in patriotic education, a new discipline of the social bloc is being introduced brightly enough our union with youth works. we are already seeing the results i have talked to our military. and they point out that even, uh, the call has begun to change. these guys who are joining the army now are generally more shirokovo armed forces. and this is good. i would even say e well, not all problems. of course, we have decided here in the youth sphere. this is by no means , but one cannot fail to see trends that are positive for a more problematic age from 30 to 45. these are, say, former or young people who recently left because of that age, and who somewhere we missed in those years when, perhaps, we

underestimated the importance of ideology, we were a little embarrassed to talk about patriotism, at least as we do it now, questions of the historical education of culture. let's put it straight, and then to our ideological opponents. there was just dominance, well, you see. we're here for you 91st for 2003 practically the word of ideology. let's say. here we are now, uh, we know our relationship to bull-7 volleys, right? 20th year beginning of 19th let alone say downtown shop next to academy of the ministry of internal affairs on masherov avenue where it's all freely sold and not only there at the airport you fly out. that's where it all is. it is sold virtually freely. here's what happened recently. and so, the generation that was formed in that period was young and young. it is even necessary to work with them, maybe more in-depth than although with all

categories, of course. ah, you need to work, but we see from sociology, this is at least another one. well, then. if not new, then working form. no informing their attitudes are different. well one of the biggest critics in front of you is how we do it. well, here you will agree largely depends on the specific speakers correctly, who are traveling correctly to a specific team. maybe i'll give you a little first. firewood into this fire, and then you will kindle it. yes, i am gasoline, i will tell you my impression, when i come to the team to perform, it is very important for me that the team is not selected in such a way that it is absolutely smooth. i want to have tough questions. and sometimes i all the same, it seems that these people are simply afraid to be introduced into this team. yes, and there is, of course, good. why? you are the most critical of me

and i consider myself to be such, because i had to go through all the stages. eh, this form of work. e has been introduced in our country since 2003, when the system policy actually began. here in march 2003, the beginning of the state ideological policy was a big seminar, the president signed decrees for this and off i was a teacher who was engaged in this work. i was one of the leaders of the union young people who also came at the bottom of the information. you correctly said that he was also the dean of the union of journalists. we were engaged in this, worked in the media , that is, i can see how it is organized, often there is a lot of formalism. that's what we write for. we talked about training manuals, because for every day of informing they write an appropriate brochure, relying on which, creatively, processing this information, it is necessary to convey the point of view that we sometimes get it. they just take and read out the rumor

team, what we want to achieve. so it's better, in general, not to hold such a day of informing , than to hold a question. our speakers, recognizable promoted in the media, of course, will not arrive on the day of information for each team. although, believe me, there are a lot of bright people in the region. this year we held belarus 1. what wonderful historians do we have in the regions? well, i’m amazing, in fact, that is, these people are local, maybe they are already recognizable at the national level, by the way, that’s television, we need to raise them here in minsk invite from mogilev vitebsk yes , definitely there. these people we see them now, by the way, during our actions we saw them. yes, your societies. in my opinion. can give us the text of the speakers who today are not enough ready to do it and will do it. these are not empty words. so continuing the day of informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy directors for ideological work and

how we appoint them to a person who simply reads this manual aloud. he probably shouldn't be in this position. right they say that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well , the word is such a commodity, but this person must be unique, i understand, you won’t find such people everywhere , so we need to think here how to convey, maybe, uh, and it’s bad, uh, with these events. let's do it in one day . there are three and a half thousand meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk to introduce seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy management. where we invite bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online in the form, when we have a person who understands this problem through online can cover? docks krug e our teams we offer it. you see, here's even one beautiful

tad-presentation, as you had in the truth mode. here you come with this one, you don't need to collect everyone. well, one person speaker will come to the district on the topic of information day and believe me, the whole district will know, there is no need to gather everyone there, there are 150 enterprises of people, the whole district will know, but here it is important to live the second part, so that officials , representatives of state authorities actually traveled. these are two lines. this speaker is an expert who understands a particular problem and representatives of the gost authorities, for whom the day of informing is a way to communicate, learn about the problems of the team, and answer people's requests. it does not always work out, yet, but we should think about improving this work. and in principle, if you like, our state ideological policy. that's in the broadest sense of the word. this is the informative and legal basis of the form method of work organizational staffing . we need to restart, firstly, from those normative acts that were adopted

back in the third and fourth year. wow, how much time has passed the twentieth year has taught us a lot now on life teaches, and therefore, it seems to me, the time has come. uh, not only such a serious big conversation, but also decisions. e in this part. in june, we had a seminar led by the president on the work of this explanatory, very sensible idea , and the president also expressed it at this seminar. e, noted the direction of the work and made a remark and criticized, but already half a year has passed. it seems to me, especially a year before the electoral campaign of our single day. which will be in the twenty-fourth year, just the time has come for such a systematization of all this work and our achievements and shortcomings. a and. that's what we said restart, if you like, maybe a provocative question. now yes, but i knew from others and do not expect society to know, significantly 2/3 of all lectures were paid. yes

, this is the system assumed in your society knowledge. yes, and they now have paid lectures. i understand this kind of question. well, here, let's accept the ideology should be. well , let's just say somewhere, maybe, and uh, the load, of course, as a public one. i'll tell you straight. we have all speeches within the framework, and the campaigns to explain the constitution were all free of charge, it was all this, well, a civil call, a patriotic call, all people work like that, but at the same time. well, let's take our expert. well, let's say it's up to the price. ace, well, first of all, he needs to break away from his the main activity, often, is traveling somewhere outside the same minsk if he himself is from minsk yes, and on the territory of minsk he needs to prepare very seriously for this, this is both emotional and intellectual costs they must compensate. well, why not, especially if, uh, our enterprises have

allocated funds for this? after all, if the company orders, as we said , one color or another. well, his expenses for this work should be compensated from my point of view. this is right. that's how to organize this work, and again, at a new level, we are now discussing such contracts, and many of our trade union organizations and enterprises conclude directly. eh, but we see that it still needs to be generalized in some way, again put on a new basis. speakers here, perhaps in this situation, many themselves want to. listen, this was such a case. we are on the talk show of vladimir rudolfovich. solovyova once mentioned this possibility, when all the subsidences all say, we will come. i think they are waiting for our the public, by the way, and certain surprises our phone is cut off, they say when it’s not joyful and insulting. that's all the same. here i say

in belarus here we are, sometimes we appreciate someone else's. uh, well, the russians are not completely foreign to us, but there in moscow or somewhere else. well , let's say. this is the same as with a musical performer will be here to sing to perform. you know very well that as soon as fr. o. you see, you will play in our theater, well, the circle of theatergoers will know, as soon as somewhere not even in the series in moscow at the theater. how is it customary say appear say, well, you see, they took it, that is, we feel it on our own, as soon as you become more likely to perform at moscow shows, as it were, of course, let's talk about it directly, but at the same time i want to say that the level of our specialists is experts for the vast majority of problems , it is very high and can be seen on the same russian talk shows. you were the dean of the faculty of philosophy of the philosophy of social sciences, philosophy, sociology, psychology, social communications, social work with the key word

philosophy, it is for everyone, as it were, understandable, and does not say anything, but still, yes, and the last ones are about a philosophical question, despite the fact that i would like to talk for a long time, but today the fight against russia has become a trend, right? not we, of course, once the trends were the minsk agreements and the end of the war. yes, in the donbass, for the sake of new trends in the fight against russia, wars with russia changed their shoes. even very strong politicians, as we thought. well , like the mayor, she still mourned attempts to repaint . sorry for such a very precise word many western politicians. they can no longer stand, they didn’t pass in the same row with either a stake or a stitcher or with a shredder. i'm not saying that they can't stand on a par with ours. this is what must happen today in order for

new european leaders to appear who, first of all, will think about their country, their people, and national interests. here's how to make it an international trend? it will certainly be its own special military operation. it became a test for everyone, for russia, for us , for the west, and for the processes that were latent. they came out that we are seeing the culture of the abolition of russia and belarus this is fascism. this is fascism, this is xenophobia, which they are trying to justify with some pseudo-democratic slogans, the fascisization of europe, we see it and we can prove it fascisization is not necessary, the fascist party and the national socialist or there is no musalini, read mrt eco read other european thinkers. how did they describe it? and how does it happen? unfortunately

, we see this happening. yes , the leaders were crushed, but i am not a supporter of these conversations that all this is the end of europe, i am convinced that new ones will appear. well, others, you see, when they copy as they tried, there johnson is copying somewhere, churchill well, the image is the trace of the population. i will give examples of orbans. why not? yes, this is a bright politician, and our opponent is an ideological political ill-wisher, belarus and the same kachinsky, is he not bright, and by the way, many in poland hate, and many idolize erdogan. it 's not exactly europe, but nonetheless. and now he returned to politics again, and berlusconi is ours, well, older, but this is our generation of ours, well, our contemporary is i am convinced it will appear, how it will happen life will make life make it just

ignore those challenges like ostriches to hide their heads repeat, like a barrel delusional slogans uh, over and over again you understand, there barrel stoltenberg ursula fonderland already some comic characters from ukraine and russia do not solve anything , but they constantly reproduce some kind of, uh, some information, yes, if you can call it that and that's it, but it's not they who decide the time will come for strong leaders, when these are the tests that we are now setting, we are standing, but also the west stands because that he loses behemonia he is doomed to defeat. it is inevitable that the center of power is moving to other regions. previously , they could no longer control the entire planet. we see this, the challenge is thrown, the struggle is hard, but they are historically doomed. and at this critical stage, a new leader will emerge. they may not look like the same degulia and certainly will not. they may be in

the military, maybe in journalists, maybe, uh, professional politics are different, but the fact that they will appear in western at least in europe and in the usa is a fact. everything you wanted to know about everyday life and to be illumined workers. you need to make a conscious decision. understand that you will need to follow certain rules. this happened in our family about the participation of parishioners in worship. here are the sitsa people who are rich in that we have such a temple near our vesta. and that we have such a rector in the temple, for 31 years now, by the faith of truth, to serve god for the healing of the soul and body, the word of god makes the country

leave every family of people who live and give a state of joy of peace and constantly, and the role of a clergyman in the life of a believer person. what if we don’t do all this , then it takes me about two weeks to make an icon somewhere, we will tell and show it in spiritual and educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel . here in the place where i lived, it was always such a

standard, remember the quality well, as we arrived in minsk, opinions came out of minsk, i liked the scotch tape. i think it's great. cool. so, lida will probably be the same as they ended up in our country. and why did they stay here. i came and said what i want, that i want to have my own team. i want to develop ballroom dancing in our city today. i am the head of an exemplary ballroom dance studio. people in belarus are very unique, they are good-natured, this was one of the key factors for us. deciding to stay here, see the program view of belarus on our tv channel.

in this issue the holiday that unites orthodox believers christmas solemnly or others visited by alexander lukashenko