like a frenchman good evening, good exactly 22 years before my birthday on may 1, 1947 , an appeal was published by a group of soviet scientists, cultural workers and public figures, with a proposal to create an all-union society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. well, in fact, society knows. let's just say it's not outdated. today, firstly, marat sergeevich look at you well with mathematics, and it is the same society that spreads not only public political knowledge, but also scientifically. well, in a sense, of course, scientifically. so that we invite you. why not yet among our cells, but in fact, yes, there were such conversations even in soviet times and social science. it was on the one hand, recognizable on the other hand. as they say, youth has become a meme. well, remember, this figured in soviet comedies. but this does not mean that it was something so bad or wrong, on the contrary. it was in great

demand. as an advantage, i found social science lecturers still very young , i remember, then they came to us and told us quite interesting things, but i'm not talking about library of social studies. imagine, recently, uh, graduate students asked me, and how lecturers used to prepare, when there was no internet, and this is how the social studies library was, there were these amazing brochures, where information was summarized. yes. there , in different countries on various problems, and with this they really armed the facts with arguments, and the newspaper was not in vain. that was the name of arguments and facts, and who knows, yes, it was the official absolutely official organ of society, knowledge itself, by the way, even circulation came out in these millions. yes, you all know, this is true again, so i invite you to become our lecturer. i don't reach. people are waiting for you. eh, but at the same time, in the nineties , they wanted to abandon the knowledge society, as well as other soviet traditions, but life itself showed that it is necessary to

come to people live, talk, explain, convey their point of view. look how synchronously the processes of the revival of social science are going on both in russia and in russia, you can ask, but how in other countries? uh huh just called in another way, here are the traditions of educational clubs, communities, they are very common. that's generally the structures within the individual lands. germany has a structure. similar to social studies are called educational centers there. somehow, here we often represent classic english clubs, you know, these are sitting gentlemen, they smoke cigars and drink. e tea, uh, whiskey, i probably don’t know, and then the nationalist hunts for nothing like that, in fact, and classic english clubs are educational structures. i'm not talking about the fact that in the european tradition, and the enlightenment there, in broad masks, they spoke about the organization of various

courses. this is society. already knowledge, with many political parties, the development of political parties is a very topical topic for belarus now, and so, with many political parties there are appropriate educational or research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes, it created not only public leaders, yes, but even screens and heroes. yes through the same outstanding actor balala yes , a favorite of women, yes, if there are sixties , but knowledge in recent years has not had bright public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, anyone, they will not even name the head of the knowledge society, neither the soviet union nor the belarusian republican and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? become a media conductor of knowledge in the society well , i think that several

factors converged here at once, but first of all, yes the first part of your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, maybe the leaders. it is not necessary to know which academician, for example, headed social studies, that academician vavilov stood at the base there, konstantin simonov, the famous poet, that is, this initiative came from them; have organized this work. he understands that it is so important that we want to name the speakers, you want to call lecturers classical, and people who who come to the audience charge. and what is called establishing contact. these are the people we have, we have them, and we are actively inviting them as part of the events that we hold. let's take two of ours, probably, over the

past year, the largest and most important actions by which we are recognized, by which we are proud, belarus 1 and belarus 1 in the pravda regime. it appeared. well, somewhere spontaneously. that's just a big conversation with the president, where he raised the issue of the knowledge society. oh, and already august-september on the eve of our first day of national unity on september 17th. we decided to drive through the regions and we saw that shpakovsky dermant is avdonin. i can list more. these are the people who are recognized, who are trusted, who listen and who are expected, that is, we can say that they are ordered in a good way. yes, we work by order in a broad sense, according to the social order and specifically of certain organizations, and in fact often they order not some kind of lecture, but this or that person. here we are waiting. let will come to us, and we will continue to continue. borovik. petrovsky a. bilyaev that's what

pleases me, journalists have appeared, who are waiting for a little light, a smooth tour indeed. and they know how to communicate with, uh, the audience, the audience listens to them completely or not quite agrees to argue, discusses. it is very important. look how many people like this we have . e in the deputy corps. and so you need to work with them for them. if you like, you need to create a platform matrix to offer a model of working methods, because we are also here we even established this year or two and the form of work, be it a dialogue platform. whether it's a lecture. it is necessary to change it is necessary to change the format of reporting information. let it be a little, but nevertheless, that is, this forum was such a shot. yes, it needs to be repeated. and what form of e are you looking at. here in february , on the eve of the vote on the constitution, we had a large forum in the pravda regime in the sports palace, and on september 17. uh, there was something similar in well, dedicated to history, this is our history

in minsk on september 17 - this was carried out under the auspices of the ministry of culture. we partially participated there, but we saw that such formats are in demand among people vladimirovich here. see. we are now talking about speakers. they are more or less even professionally trained, but in the same ussr there was galina ulanova yes, a ballerina a ballerina. yes, it can be called silver now . yes, they would. but i know who you see now as the headliners of the renewed society. you know, it's interesting, they mentioned the ballerina, as if you were reading our plans. although i know that i was not shared. yes, we are now working very actively with our big theatre. e with e. ekaterina dulova about the interaction and

forms of presenting information using musical and theatrical methods. and i really like the way we worked. i also see that people are in demand on the stage of the kupala theater, when in august of this year our kupala patriotic forum was held. and we even interact with the national beauty school. we see, i’ll say it directly, maybe even looking ahead. here is our famous merch the first is the slogans that are written, with which we go out, because behind each of these slogans there is an idea. behind each of these slogans there is a certain message, this appeal and it can be revealed, relying on it, you can convey this or that information, an idea, it can be embodied in different forms, and we are trying these forms. and in working with the audience. you have an understanding, if we remember the social science of the soviet union, we understand. there were 2,000 academicians, there were more than 200,000

doctors. yes, there were 400,000 engineers, yes, who took part in one way or another in the work of social science. we understand that in order to come to the same audience of cultural workers. yes, it is desirable that a person has certain knowledge in this area and speaks the same language with them. you have such an understanding, but if he talks about the topic of cultures, because we have cultural workers, i had to speak. eh, workers in the sphere of culture, if you are talking about geopolitics or economics, you should first of all analyze another issue in this. you correctly state that when you you communicate with people, you must understand who you are talking to. and speak to them in uh, a language they can understand and understand, although i'll tell you. right now, on the eve of the seventy-fifth anniversary, we have organized such a lecture marathon on the basis of the academy of management, a series of lectures dedicated to the national idea of ​​geopolitics , economics, and historical continuity. and this is a very profound lecture. it's because, you

know, we have sometimes. they want to follow the audience, they just want to captivate, but it is important that there is knowledge and understanding of arguments, and we have organized such a series of lectures, and we see how people perceive them, we will continue this lecture to continue the war yet. you have already mentioned that the president was an active lecturer in social studies and in the year 78 , it was he who became a responsible secret. shklov organization. yes, the society is now becoming the leader of the republican. social science yes, you certainly raised the archives. yes, and interested. by this very fact, of course, i am grateful to our archival workers. we looked at the materials. and by the way, we also looked at newspaper publications, because social science is always, uh, active reflected in the media as it is now. here. you, when you said that you had not heard anything for several years, but this communication was not organized. i'm not saying who's to blame there knowledge or themselves. well, this fact is just

very important to interact. by the way, when the society was created in the forty-seventh year, one of the tasks was to widely publish in the media, including, interestingly, the transcripts of the lecture. this is such a task that we can say that lecturer lukashenka was expected. uh his information trusted the audience what we now know were always crowded, he was preparing for a lecture. this is very important. uh worked with relevant literature. this is what we see, and at that time i am convinced that the formation of the personality of our president is of his certain style. that time of work and the responsible secretary, the electric motor wife had more time than, uh, holding a full-time position in the knowledge society. so this had a big impact on him. ok then. here is the president by his decree in 2007 transformed the public association knowledge

into a republican state public association. come on, it's a status, and with your appointment in the twenty-first year. yes, in fact, he breathed new life into it. well let's talk straight. i do n’t bow before you, i say what is what i see, i’ll sincerely appreciate clairvoyance. president, he knows what will be needed in the future, and i'm not just talking about your organization. well, you must admit, what is the cost of anti-privatization alone, and state-owned enterprises pandemics, when we were not driven by moisture. when he really wanted to, and here's how you explain these things to yourself. this is some kind of special knowledge. well, firstly, as regards the attention of the president to our society, i feel that the decree was not only of the seventh year, but also last year in november. he didn't just support us. well, he set specific tasks, and they are promising, but also demanding, which we

must do in the field of historical knowledge of political and scientific popularization of science. of course, we will fulfill the goals and the tasks that were set, but if we talk about the president, lukashenka, of course, this is a very big intuition. it's important, that we don't learn. these are innate feelings. then a great worldly experience is huge. that's why the president always says you need to go from life, because there should be no artificiality, there should be desire. well , you know, you need to indulge in something rational, which is characteristic of our belarusian nature of reasoning. and yolka, i'm like me. well, may be an anchor to drum, not only you have an alley axis, uh, you live somewhere and this is here is a clear understanding that is peculiar to us, it is

inherent in the president, of course, this is a huge store of knowledge certainly ah and trust in specialists, because look, during the same covid, there were always specialists next to the president. in this area. these are not some arbitrary decisions. they are based on a deep analysis of the information supplied by specialists and only after that a decision is made. everything you wanted to know about everyday life and being a clergyman. you need to make a conscious decision and understand what you need will follow certain rules. it happened in our family about the participation of parishioners in divine services because we have such a church

in our message. and that we have such abbots in the temple, for 31 years now, with the faith of truth, to serve god for the healing of the soul and body, the word of god represents the country leaves every family of people who live and gives the state of joy of a clergyman in the life of a believer. then it takes me about two weeks to make an icon somewhere, we will tell and show it in spiritual and educational projects on belarus 24 tv channel. we talk about

the most interesting of the world of science, doctors from all over the world are literally on the verge of a real revolution of transition to a new type of medicine all over the world, including in our state, today's medicine meets the principles; today i propose to see, as always, together with scientists, what we ask on a plate , the most exciting questions and give. the answers to them are some norms. for the same proteins, carbohydrates and fats, the ratio of proteins, fats, carbohydrates, in parts per day, is approximately 1:14. we sat down sausages scrambled eggs. well we're still in lunch sat down cutlet chop in the evening again cheese and so on. and if you re-read these on the run, then we will get, of course, preventive medicine, what is it? as far as prevention is concerned, we prevent the development of some health complications,

see the science mania project on the belarus 24 tv channel, on tuesday the president held an important meeting to bring individual laws in line with the updated constitution, here are two important documents . all belarusian popular assembly and law-political parties. here are the main messages you heard for yourself, not debatable, but those that are necessary for deep reflection, understanding and bringing to people. and now, you must agree, your task is precisely this , when we discussed the amendments to the amendments to the constitution, there were just the same questions concerning the entire belarusian people's assembly. uh, among the leaders in uh, discussion. yes, people asked, what is it for what is it already, when we held dialogue platforms in the fall. why did the entire belarusian people's assembly

not ask if there was understanding, there is understanding, and the question arose only there, how is his bed, uh, how will it be directly? yes, how will it work? here, as it seems, the main thing is the entire belarusian people's assembly, it is not lukashenka who needs it, it is not the presidential power that needs it. the country needs it, for which it is to ensure the stable development of society, to ensure continuity and as a vivid embodiment of the true principle of democracy. unfortunately, the model of democracy that we offer, and more often impose the west is a manipulative model, we see how it actually happens. this is the model of the oligarchy, which uses various tricky technologies. he is trying to explain to the people, but to create the illusion

that the people are involved in governance, we are really laying the whole belarusian people's assembly, uh, the principle of our true democracy that we associate it with our traditions. this is no coincidence. here i will not even touch the evening. take the 20th century, our belarusian experience, all-belarusian congress of the seventeenth year. it was in a non-parliamentary form, but the people got together and claimed their right to live in their own land and determine how we live. take the people’s assembly of western belarus in the thirty -ninth year, thanks to which we were united in one state, it had great legitimacy, and we can see this from the documents of any historian who has come across the history of the people’s gathering behind the gangway and belarus will confirm that it was a genuine people’s representation in the ninety-sixth year in full swing. we remember islands of constitutional political crisis. the people's assembly is all belarusian. the people's assembly played a huge role in the

twentieth year in february. that is, we are already shaping our historical experience, including that of recent history, into a legislative form, that is, not something so illusory, but something that already exists, something that has already been developed and is laying a certain perspective. yes, we are pioneers here, but there is no need to be afraid of this, since we still rely on our understanding of our political system. and how to ensure the main principle is that the people should be the source of power well, but the main reproach thrown at the government by yes is that labor collectives. they will not be represented practically in the composition of the supreme people's forces. the president spoke very clearly about this, how you will bring it up. eh, i'll tell you that when we had discussions now. here, uh, reproach, even far-fetched. well, that such a problem

was not raised, people rather said how to take part, you just need to be able to explain it, because the majority there will be just representatives of the labor teams. here is a concrete example. hmm , about a third is a deputy and, moreover, at all levels of the village councils and the president insisted that we preserve the village council in the constitution, this is the one, the first level, when a person encounters a representative of the authorities or vice versa takes on part of this power, becoming a deputy from the village council before the national assembly of the house of representatives of the soviet republic and this is not representatives of labor collectives. where do our deputies come from? we have deputies only in the house of representatives, everyone else is working off the job , look, these are doctors, teachers, businessmen. uh, these are people from this or that collective, well, let's take our main , uh, civil society actors, who

will send trade union representatives to their representatives. well, a trade union is the flesh of the flesh of labor collectives. this is, in principle, the work of the collection of the belarusian, republican youth union. and where do we have young people in the classroom and in labor collectives, they will also be avoided, the same applies to veterans white russia of the union of women, these are the representatives of these groups. and why do we have a question, when is a public association at all. if not they put forward with us the same director of the enterprise has quite a lot of worries about the economy and the provision of jobs for the sale of products. i can list further. we are still the management and, uh, the team has a task than the organization. here is the election. and why were there trade unions in this collective then, and why did they put forward from this collective either by collecting signatures or directly from the collective put forward his deputy. this is their voice, their voice will be presented to the entire belarusian national assembly, so there is logic here. it seems obvious to me. it seems to me that

one more point should be emphasized, president. e drew attention to it well, delegates. it is not just that all the belarusian people's assembly should participate. they must then come to their labor collectives and report back. that is, they must then work with them. maybe what we lacked before the constitutional referendum, and before this law we have we were delegates. well, we have worked out all the belarusian people's gathered. let's be honest, let's go. here i took part once and still no. now you are for the entire duration of the entire belarusian people's assembly. what makes it easier, first of all, to be responsible to those who nominated you? it's not just you being present. communicated with like-minded people, worked there 1 2 3 more days, listened to the president, asked questions, discussed the program of socio-economic development. you are responsible for the implementation of this decision and, moreover, the powers with which we we endow the entire belarusian people's assembly.

they are huge, in fact, such a collective body, uh, in the hands of which the fate of our country will be. including even in the most difficult situations a good political party. yes, the second part of the second normative document that was discussed. here's a clear one for you. which parties should remain. that's what we discussed a lot on this topic, yes, and we had different points of view. look here. let's compare with those strange ones. where did political parties come from, if in fact they were reborn there, of those parties that we study in the course, classical political science, which were written about by scientists representatives of political science in the middle of the 20th century. well, they don't. well, take it any, but oh well, there is an american system, it is special. well, take the french parties, but where are those classical socialists, galist communists, new movements are now being created. uh, very fast dynamics of political life,

everything changes, and we are often offered. no , let's go back. here we will create something to that scheme of the fifties. we must, firstly, look at the trends, and secondly, proceed from our own interests , the party should not divide society. it should represent the interests of a significant part of society, not necessarily all, but not to divide the party should not demand the overthrow of the constitutional order. it can and should criticize the government if it is not itself the government, but the party cannot be financed without leading to a civil split, and abroad the party cannot be an instrument of an individual oligarch or oligarchic groups, it cannot be bought by some big businessman, these are the key requirements, but the party must have some kind of ideology, the party cannot be created only to participate in this or that electoral campaign. and this is a very serious demand that

the party must represent the whole of society. er, well, not necessarily. that's right, all citizens. but if this is a party, it should be in minsk, and it should be in vitebsk in all regions, except for the regional level. we have districts, but if not in all then, well, at least in the third should be structures. when a person comes out, he says, i am a representative of one party or another. we must understand. yes , there are at least 10, 20, 30,000 party members behind him. this is such a program, we understand who we are dealing with, and if the party was created in order to cut grants or satisfy someone's ambitions, why does the belarusian society need such a party and most importantly, god forbid, if this happens, this is in the future a way of manipulating our political system, usually from abroad. here are placed clear obstacles. you think that we have already got rid of random parties. here's a new look, not

yet, not yet, not yet. uh, let's wait for the adoption of the law, then, as i understand it, the procedure for re-registration of the party should go through, probably some parties will leave. even obviously there will be new parties. uh, i don't know. can we talk about, uh, concrete examples here? well, i would still say, look how they showed themselves. the communist party works according to the norms, and many have tried to impose such an image. eh, this party is from the past. yes, this is it. where it's just the old people there, well, if the old people, well, look how many young sheets appeared in the bright recognizable liberal-democratic party. how it works, yes, yes, there are ambitions about white russia. well, let's see how the situation will develop. i see that there is. eh, some ideological ones. well, no matter how associations, but niches based on our constitutional system, which is not yet

represented at the party level, it means that they may have appeared. i like your thought that was said. that's when we started discussing this block. eh, it really isn't. vns, not the party, the president does n't really need them, they are personal. yes, he does not need them as portraits. indeed, in fact, the president has always communicated directly with the people, and this was his main distinguishing feature. here, in essence. we are talking about the fact that they should become the same parties, uniting them with such a uniting principle for protection against external threats, as if observing the main principle, everything is in the interests of their state. now, if we clearly understand this and convey this very moment, probably, well, it seems to me, then understanding will be correct. let's just say alexander lukashenko, he is the creator. here is that independent sovereign belarus as we know it. i think it's hard for anyone to argue with that. and now he understands time is changing and belarus and he wants to define, but that political model, including

the social model of our development, which will remain for many years ahead, and we are interested in this. this is where the president's interest coincides with the public interest. uh-huh i got such a thought pushed. here, look, we have been talking for several years in a row, including as part of the work of lecturers, or there we already had speakers as a lecturer. i remember truth mode worked well thanks to. here are the people sitting here , including, it was such a collective work in fact. look, we have been talking about the ball manual for several years. yes, and 50 years will already be as follows does not work. look, yes, and in fact, 2020. yes, he made a professional out of us, those who are already beginning to really understand what it happened, how it happened and that we are not really unique in all this, but we

turned out to be the only ones who turned out to be too tough , the west. . yes, and not anti-sharpa? yes, but to name lukashenka's training manual there is such there is such a request, and hmm it is obvious to do this, i will share with you just an observation. that's from the twentieth year. well, in general. today, we talked about the belarusian character. there is such a character. we do not like to brag or show our own there , on the contrary, we will hide something somewhere. well, you know that there, uh, and the neighbors did not envy, and so, well, just in case, so as not to jinx it. well, sometimes belarusians are not often treated like that, uh, and i noticed that there are a lot of colleagues in russia and even in far abroad countries. although it is to study this experience, they do it so carefully. inviting to some events or coming here and now, not immediately, but

gradually speaks. and how did it happen to you, what did you do, and why is it like this they have already happened and indeed, not only opponents, but also allies or potential allies are looking at us very seriously. this belarusian experience is very valuable. i think that we are already in lectures somewhere, talking at international conferences. e, including with statesmen of foreign countries outlined this experience. eh, well, it's probably time to generalize it and propose it in the form of some kind of possible one. i just won't do research. don't just wake up the depth. i have to emphasize one point all the time they wrote so far this information hanging free encyclopedia. yes, like wikipedia that, in order to cope with that information war, the information struggle in the twentieth, flew here. yes, a few. hello , who provided this information

victory, and in fact, when we understand that we did it ourselves. uh, this is well worth the availability of information. yes, i want to ask, you were the dean of the faculty, you know how to communicate with young people. here are our enemies. they didn't calm down. they rely heavily on the younger generation, who to the electoral company will have the right to vote. yes, and the right to choose. they need such new blood to replace the one that either figured out the situation or sat down, as they say, yes. so, are you going to use a fashionable internet platform and talks in the same tiktok about the same genocide, continuing the previous ones question is , in order to be successful, do not try to be fashionable, but because there will be only an external form no result and no need work according to methodology. and there must be inspiration and there must be you know this understanding, like the military, they say

you want to win, knowing the charter, but you didn’t let go of the fight. here you must understand the algorithm of actions, what you must do, but if you catch only according to the charter, nothing will work. if you don’t know, the joint wo n’t work either, so we need to understand. this basis should be knowledge and a sense of the situation. well, we see how our president works. and as for the youth for 2 years. i’ll tell you, quite a lot has been honestly done, and we even see how the enemy reacts to this, uh, i won’t just to speak knowledge in his society. we work very closely with the ministry of education. look at the anthem performed in schools. the flag is being raised, very serious systematic work is underway in historical education in patriotic education , a new discipline, a social bloc, our union with youth is being implemented brightly enough. we are already seeing the results i have talked to

our military. and they emphasize that even the call has begun to change. these are the guys who join the army, now the armed forces are generally more widespread. and this is good. i would even said e well not all the problems. of course , we have decided here in the youth sphere. i don’t want this in any way, but you can’t help but see the trends that are positive for the more problematic age from 30 to 45. these are, say, former or young people who left not so long ago because of that age, and whom where we missed something in those years when, perhaps, we underestimated the significance of ideology, we were a little embarrassed to talk about patriotism, at least as we do it now, questions of the historical education of culture. let's get straight say, and then our mediaological opponents. there was simply dominance there, well, you must admit the ninety-first to 2003, almost a word of ideology. let's say. here we are

now, uh, we know our relationship to bullish symbolism, right? the twentieth year, the beginning of the nineteenth, let alone in the city center a store next to the academy of the ministry of internal affairs on masherov avenue, where everything is freely sold. and not only there you fly out at the airport. that's where it all is. it is sold virtually freely. here's what happened recently. and so, the generation that was formed in that period was young young. it is even necessary to work with them, maybe more in-depth than although with all categories, of course. uh, you have to work, but we see from sociology, it's at least another one, okay then. if not new, then working form. yes, not informing the attitude towards them is different. well one of the biggest critics in front of you is how we do it. well, here you will agree that it largely depends on the specific speakers correctly, who travel correctly to a

specific team. maybe i'll give you a little first. firewood into this fire, and you then his e will be kindled. yes, i am gasoline, i will tell you my impression, when i come to the team to perform, it is very important for me that the team is not selected in such a way that it is absolutely smooth. i want to have tough questions. and sometimes it still seems to me that these people are simply afraid to be introduced into this team, and there is such a thing, of course, it’s good. why? you are my most critical critic and i consider myself to be one because i had to. eh, go through all the stages. eh, this form of work. e was implemented with us 2003, when systemic politics actually began. here in march 2003, the beginning of the state ideological policy was a big seminar, the president signed decrees for this and off i was a teacher who was engaged in this work. i was one of the leaders of the

youth union, who also came to inform at the bottom. you correctly said that he was also the dean of the union of journalists. we were engaged in this, worked in the media , that is, i can see how it is organized, often there is a lot of formalism. that's what we write for. we talked about training manuals, because a corresponding brochure is written for each day of informing , based on which, creatively, processing this information, it is necessary to convey the point of view that we sometimes get it. they just take and read out the hearing of the team, what we want to achieve. so it's better, in general, not to hold such a day of informing , than to conduct a question. our speakers, recognizable hyped in copper, of course, will not arrive exactly on the day of information for each team. although we believe in there are a lot of bright people in the region. this year we held belarus 1. what wonderful historians do we have in the regions? well, i’m amazing, in fact, that is, these people are local, maybe they are not so, recognizable at the

national level, by the way, that’s tv, we need to raise them and invite them here to minsk from mogilev vitebsk to grodny by means yes there must be these people, we see them now, these during our actions. we saw them, yes, your societies. in my opinion. can give us the text of the speakers, which today is not enough ready ready to do it and will do it. these are not empty words. so continuing the day of informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy director for ideological work and how we appoint them to a person who simply reads this manual aloud. he probably shouldn't be in this position. it is rightly said that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well, the word is such a commodity, but this person must be unique, i understand, you won’t find such people everywhere, so we need to think here how to inform, maybe , uh, and dishonor, uh, with these events. let's do it in one day. there are three and

a half thousand meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk to introduce seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy of management. where we invite bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online in the form, when we have a person who understands this problem through online can cover? rock e our bands we offer it. you understand here. uh, even one beautiful tad presentation. as you had in the truth mode . here you will arrive with this, you don’t need to collect everyone. well, one speaker will come to the district on the topic of the day of informing and believe me, the whole district will know there is no need to collect people from everyone there, there are 150 enterprises of people, the whole district will know, but it is important to live here the second part, so that officials and representatives of state authorities travel actually. these are two lines. this speaker is an expert

who understands a particular problem and representatives of state authorities, for whom information day is a way to communicate , learn about the problems of the team, answer people's questions. it does not always work out, yet, but we should think about improving this work. and in principle, if you like, our state ideological policy. that's in the broadest sense of the word. this is an informative and legal basis for the form of the method of work of organizational staffing. we need to restart, firstly, from those normative acts that were adopted back in the third and fourth year. wow, how long has it been twentieth year us a lot taught now on life teaches, and therefore, it seems to me, the time has come. eh, not only such a serious big conversation, but the solution, in this part, we had a seminar in june under the leadership of the president on the work of this very sensible explanatory thought , and the president expressed it at this seminar. e, noted the direction of the work and made

a remark and criticized, but already half a year has passed. it seems to me, especially a year before the electoral campaign of our single day. which will be in the twenty-fourth year, the time has come for such a systematization of all this work and our achievements and shortcomings. a and. that's what we said restart, if you like, maybe a provocative question. now yes, but i don't expect peanut knowledge from others, significantly 2/3 of all lectures were paid. yes, this is the system assumed in your knowledge society. yes, and they now have paid lectures. i understand such a question always as well, here, let's just have an ideology. well, let's say it straight somewhere, maybe, and uh, the load, of course, as in general, i'll say it straight. at we were all speeches within the framework, and the campaigns to clarify the constitution were all free of charge

it was all that. well, here is a civil call, a patriotic call, all people work like that, but at the same time. let's take our expert. well, let's say it's up to the price. well , firstly, he needs to break away from his main activity, often, this is a trip somewhere outside the same minsk if he himself is from minsk yes, and on the territory in minsk he needs to prepare very seriously for this, this is both emotional and intellectual costs they are compensated. well, why not? even more so, uh, our enterprises have allocated funds for this, because if an enterprise orders, as we said, one color or another. well, his expenses for this work should be compensated from my point of view. this is correct. here's how to organize this work, but again on a new level. we are already discussing such agreements,

and many of our trade union organizations and enterprises conclude them directly. eh, but we see that it still needs to be generalized in some way, again put on a new basis. speakers here, perhaps, in this situation, many themselves want to. listen, i this was such a case. we are on the talk show of vladimir rudolfovich. solovyov somehow mentioned this possibility when everyone arrived home. everyone says we will come. i think that our audience is waiting here, by the way, and certain surprises our phone is cut off , they say when it's sad and insulting. hmm that's all the same. so i say to belarus here we are, sometimes we value someone else's. uh, well, the russians are not completely foreign to us, but there in moscow or somewhere else. well, let's say. it is too the same as with a musical performer will sing to perform here. you know very well that as soon as fr. o. you see, you will play in our theater, well, the circle of theater-goers will know, as soon as somewhere not even in the series in moscow at the theater. as it is customary

to say there, they will appear, they say, well, you see, they took it, this is how we feel it, as soon as you become more frequent on moscow talk shows, as it were, of course, let's talk about it directly, but at the same time i want to say, that the level of our specialists experts on the vast majority of problems are very loud here and can be seen on the same russian talk shows. you were the dean of the faculty of philosophy of the philosophy of social sciences, philosophy, sociology, psychology, social communications, social work, the key word is philosophy, it is, as it were, understandable for everyone, and does not mean anything. well, that's it, then , ah, the last ones are about a philosophical question, despite the fact that i would like to talk for a long time, but today the fight against russia has become a trend, right? we certainly didn't ever trend there were minsk agreements and the end of the war yes in the donbass