tonkov of hundred residents in the great stone summed up the results of 2022, as the administration of the scientific and industrial cluster said during this period, the volume of sales of export products produced in the park exceeded $100 million this year. the great stone plans to attract another two dozen new residents. in addition , a modern line for the production of dry food for cats and dogs will appear among the large premier park and infrastructure facilities in zhabinka. it will be opened at the site of the local feed mill. today at the enterprise produce food for agricultural and domestic animals demand for goods large production is loaded at 95% of its capacity. the new line will allow to produce even more goods. this will increase profits, create these additional jobs, and also allow expanding the product line in the zhidkovo region. we make decisions that are appropriate to create a preferential regime for doing business to reduce the burden on the enterprise, thereby attracting

economic entities here to invest in investments for the development of production for in addition, in the zhebenkovsky region there will be a benefit for residents of science and technology parks this year in the zhabinka region implements 10 investment projects in the industry agriculture and the social sphere 11 institutions of the brest region have become schools of the world the project is implemented with the support of the belarusian peace fund of the ministry of education and the un office in belarus and that's the goal of educating children in common human values. humanism justice culture, communication majority, schools of the world, brest the regions are located in the villages of the malorita kobrin ivanovo and brest districts. their students are engaged in research work, learn about the exploits of their fellow countrymen and draw public attention to the history of heroes. the hallmark of the slavianski bazaar in vitebsk, the arch of the main concert

venue of the summer amphitheater festival will change its appearance. after modernization. a modern led display will appear here, which will significantly expand the possibilities of the arch. it will become an important part of the shorthand content in the summer amphitheater. now being developed. we work with both technical teams. so very often our artistic group will come up with something according to our ideas and thoughts that the technicians cannot then realize, so there is a very large negotiation process here. we compromise with each other so that in the end it will be not only a beautiful picture in the hall of the summer amphitheater, but also for the multi-million audience that watches us on tv this year. the 32nd slavic bazaar in vitebsk will be held from 12 to 17 july.

important social issues that cannot be ignored, firstly, i came to school with no experience of communicating with children in practice. yes, that is, well, my parents took me out for a walk. there, conditionally, in the sandbox in childhood, but again. it was not such an independent communication, as perhaps there in a kindergarten or somewhere else, each age has its own developmental tasks and, indeed, a child. maybe brilliant, that is, with regard to cognitive abilities, with regard to some educational data. i assume it's probably a child. maybe you can comprehend this. if you think that by stuffing maximum information into the brain, you will somehow make your child more successful, no, the child should be a child, we will deal with the guests who have the

necessary knowledge of it for children. it is very important in their physical development to have their old selves. yu equal and it is in this flock that development takes place, i did not see it. this is exactly what this desire is. it all looks great for me to study, see the project of the concept without time on belarus 24 tv channel.

good evening, good evening, exactly 22 years before my birthday on may 1, 1947, an appeal was published by a group of soviet scientists, cultural workers and public figures, with a proposal to create an all-union society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. well, in fact, society knows. let's just say it's not outdated.

today, firstly, marat sergeevich i look at you well with mathematics, and it is society that disseminates not only public political knowledge, but also scientifically. well, in the sense of natural science. so we are you welcome. why not yet among our lecturers, but in fact, yes there were such conversations, even in soviet times and social science. it was on the one hand, recognizable on the other hand. as they say, youth has become memes. well, remember, we figured this in soviet comedies. but this does not mean that it was something so bad or wrong, on the contrary. it was in great demand. as an advantage, i found social science lecturers still very young , i remember, then they came to us and told us quite interesting things, but i'm not talking about library of social studies. imagine, recently, uh, graduate students asked me, and how lecturers used to prepare, when there was no internet, and this is how the social studies library was, there were these amazing brochures, where information was summarized. yes. there , in different countries on various problems, and

with this they really armed the facts with arguments, and the newspaper was not in vain. that was the name of arguments and facts, and who knows, yes, it was the official absolutely official organ of society, knowledge itself, by the way, even circulation came out in these three million. yes, you all know, this is true again, so i invite you to become our lecturer. i don't reach. people are waiting for you. eh, but at the same time, in the nineties, they wanted to abandon the knowledge society, as well as other soviet traditions, but life itself showed that it is necessary to come to people live, talk, explain, convey their point of view. look how synchronously the processes of the revival of social science are going on both in russia and in russia, you can ask, but how in other countries? uh-huh, it's just called differently. traditions of educational clubs, communities, they are very common. that's generally the structures within the individual lands. germany has a structure. similar to

social studies are called educational centers there. somehow, here we often represent classic english clubs, you know, these are sitting gentlemen, they smoke cigars and drink. e tea, er, whiskey, i probably don’t know, and then the nationalist hunts for nothing like that in fact, and classic english clubs are educational structures. i'm not talking about the european tradition, and the enlightenment there, in broad disguise, spoke of the organization of various courses. that's what it is. already knowledge, with many political parties, the development of political parties is a very topical topic for belarus now, and so, with many political parties there are appropriate educational or research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes, it created not only public leaders, yes, but even screens and heroes. yes , through the same outstanding actor balala yes , a favorite of women, yes, if there is the sixties

years, but knowledge in recent years has not had bright public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, they will not even name the leader of the knowledge society, either the soviet union or the belarusian republican union, and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? to become a media conductor of knowledge, well, society well, i think that several factors have converged here at once, but first of all, yes, the first part of your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, maybe the leaders. no need to know which academician for example, he headed social studies, that academician vavilov stood at the base there, konstantin simonov, the famous poet, that is , this initiative came from them

; he understands that it is so important that we want to call the speakers you want to call the lecturers classical, and the people who come to the audience charge. and what is called establishing contact. these are the people we have, they we have and we actively invite them as part of the events that we hold. let's take two of ours, probably, for the last year, the largest most basic actions by which we are recognized and by which we are proud, belarus 1 and belarus 1 in the pravda regime . it appeared e. well, somewhere spontaneously. that's just a big conversation with the president, where he raised the issue of the knowledge society. oh, and already in august-september on the eve of our first day of national unity on september 17th. we decided to drive through the regions and we saw that shpakovsky dermant is avdonin. i

i can list more. these are the people who are recognized, trusted, listened to and expected. that is, we can say that it is right to order them in a good way. yes, we work by order in a broad sense, according to the social order and specifically of certain organizations, and in fact often they order not some kind of lecture, but this or that person. here we are waiting. let him come to us, and we will continue to continue. borovik. petrovsky a. bilyaev that's what pleases me, journalists have appeared, who are waiting for a little light, a smooth tour indeed. and they they know how to communicate with an uh audience, the audience listens to them completely or does not quite agree to argue, discusses. it is very important. look how many people like this we have . e in the deputy corps. and so you need to work with them for them. if you like, you need to create a platform matrix to offer a model of working methods, because we have also

established even this year or two and the form of work, be it a dialogue platform. whether it's a lecture. it is necessary to change it is necessary to change the format of reporting information. let it be a little, but no less, that is, this forum he was such a shot. yes, it needs to be repeated. and what form of e are you looking at. here in february , on the eve of the vote on the constitution, there was a large forum in the regime of truth in the sports palace, and on september 17. eh, there was something similar to e in well dedicated to history, this is our history in minsk on september 17 - this was carried out under the auspices of the ministry of culture. we partially participated there, but we saw that such formats are in demand among people vladimirovich here. see. we are now talking about speakers. they are more or less even professionally trained, but in the same ussr there was galina ulanova yes, a ballerina a

ballerina. yes, it can be called silver now . yes, they would. but i know who you see now as the headliners of the renewed society. you know, it's interesting, they mentioned the ballerina, as if you were reading our plans. even though i know we didn't share. yes, we are now working very actively with our big theatre. e with e. ekaterina dulova about the interaction and forms of presenting information in the musical meteatral methods, and i really like the way we worked. i also see that people are in demand on the stage of the kupala theater, when in august of this year our kupala patriotic forum was held. and we even interact with the national beauty school. we see, i’ll say it straight, even, perhaps, looking ahead. here is our famous merch of the first m-th all the slogans that

are written, with which we go out, because behind each of these slogans there is an idea. behind each of these slogans there is a certain message, this appeal and it can be revealed based on it is possible to convey this or that information to an idea, it can be embodied in different forms, and we try these forms. and in working with the audience. you have an understanding, if we remember the social science of the soviet union, we understand. there were 2,000 academicians, there were more than 200,000 doctors. yes, there were 400,000 engineers, yes, who took part in one way or another in the work of social science. we understand that in order to come to the same audience of cultural workers. yes , it is desirable that a person has certain knowledge in this area and speaks the same language with them. language. you have such an understanding, but if he talks about the topic of cultures, because we have cultural workers, i had to speak. eh, cultural workers, if you are talking about geopolitics

or economics, you must first of all understand another issue. you correctly point out that when you communicate with people, you must understand who you are talking to. and speak to them in a language they understand and understand , although i will tell you. right now, on the eve of the seventy-fifth anniversary, we have organized such a marathon of lectures on on the basis of the academy of management, a series of lectures on the national idea of ​​the geopolitics of the economy, but on historical continuity. and this is a very profound lecture. it's because, you know, we have sometimes. they want to follow the audience, they just want to captivate, but it is important that there is knowledge and understanding of the arguments, and we organized such a series of lectures, and we see how people perceive, and we will continue this lecture hall. you have already mentioned that the president was an active lecturer in social studies and in the seventy-eighth year it was he who became the executive secretary shklov regional organization. yes, the society is now becoming the head of the republican.

social science yes, you certainly raised the archives. yes, and interested. by this very fact, of course, i am grateful to our archival workers. we looked at the materials. and by the way, we also looked at newspaper publications, because social science has always been actively reflected in the media, as it is now. here. you, when you said that you had not heard anything for several years, but this communication was not organized. i don't say who's to blame there knowledge or themselves. well, this fact is just very important to interact. by the way, when the society was created in the forty-seventh year, one of the tasks was to widely publish in the media, including, interestingly, the transcripts of the lecture. this is such a task that we can say that lecturer lukashenka was expected. uh, his information was trusted to the audience what we now know was always crowded, he was preparing for

lectures. this is very important. uh worked with relevant literature. here is what we see, and by that time i am convinced that the formation of the personality of our president is of his certain style. that time of work and the responsible secretary, the electric motor wife had more time than, uh, holding a full-time position in the knowledge society. so this had a big impact on him. ok then. in 2007, by his decree, the president transformed the public association of knowledge into a republican state public association. oh well, this is status, and with your appointment in the twenty-first year. yes, in fact, he breathed new life into it. well let's talk straight. i do n’t bow before you, i say what is what i see, i’ll sincerely appreciate clairvoyance. president, he knows what will be needed in the future, and i'm not just talking about your organization. well, you must admit, what is

anti-privatization alone worth, and state-owned enterprises and pandemics, when moisture did not drive us. when he really wanted to, but how do you explain these things to yourself? this is some kind of special knowledge. well, first of all, with regard to attention of the president to our society my feel and the decree was not only the seventh year, but also last year in november. they simply supported us, but also set specific tasks and they are promising, but also demanding, which we must do in the field of historical knowledge, political and scientific popularization of science. of course, we will fulfill the goals and tasks that have been set, but speaking of president lukashenko, of course, this is a very big intuition. it's important, that we don't learn. this is an innate feeling. then great everyday experience is huge that's why

the president always says you need to go from life, because there should be no artificiality there should be desire. well , you know, something rational needs to be created, which is characteristic of our belarusian nature of reasoning. and yolka yak i, well, my anchor is a drummer, not only you have an axis, uh, you live somewhere and this is a clear understanding that is peculiar to us, it is inherent in the president, of course, this is a huge store of knowledge definitely a and trust in specialists, after all look at same time there were always specialists next to the president. in this area. these are not some arbitrary decisions. they are based on an in- depth analysis of the information provided by specialists, and only after that one or another decision is made.

on tuesday, the president held an important meeting to bring individual laws in line with the updated constitution. these are two important documents. were considered is the laws obns, and all the belarusian people's assembly and the law on political parties. here are the main messages you have already heard for yourself not debatable, but those that are necessary for deep reflection, understanding and communication to people. and now, you must agree, your task is precisely this when we discussed the changes to the add-on. the constitution was just the same questions concerning the entire belarusian people's assembly were. uh, among the leaders in uh, discussion. yes, people asked, what is it for what is it already, when we held dialogue platforms in the fall. why is it necessary that the entire belarusian people's assembly was not asked if there was understanding, there is understanding, and the question arose only there, how to

form it. eh, how will it be directly? yes, how will it work? here, as it seems, the main thing is not lukashenko who needs the belarusian people's assembly. it is not necessary for the presidential power, it is necessary for the country, for which, to ensure the stable development of society, to ensure continuity and as a vivid embodiment of the true principle of democracy. unfortunately, the model of democracy that we are offered, and more often imposed by the west, is a manipulative model, we see how it actually happens. this is the model of the oligarchy, which uses various cunning technologies. he is trying to explain to the people, but to create the illusion that the people are involved in governance, we are

really laying the whole belarusian people's assembly, uh, the principle of our true democracy that we associate it with our traditions. this is no coincidence. here i will not even touch the evening. take the 20th century, our belarusian experience, all the belarusian congress of the seventeenth year. it was in a non-parliamentary form, but the people gathered and declared his right to live on his land and determine how we live. take the people’s assembly of western belarus in the thirty -ninth year, thanks to which we united in one state, it had great legitimacy, and we can see this from the documents of any historian who has come across the history of the people’s gathering of gangways and belarus will confirm that it was a genuine popular representation in 906 in full swing. we remember the islands of constitutional political crisis. the people's assembly is all belarusian. folk the assembly played a huge role in the twentieth year in february. that is, we are already

shaping our historical experience, including that of recent history, into a legislative form, that is, not something so illusory, but something that already exists, something that has already been developed and is laying a certain perspective. yes, we are pioneers here, but there is no need to be afraid of this, since we still rely on our understanding of our political system. and how to ensure the main principle that the people should be the source of power is good, but the main reproach thrown against the authorities is that labor collectives. they will not be represented practically in the composition of the vns , the president spoke very clearly about this, how you will bring it up. eh, i'll tell you that when we had discussions now. here, uh, reproach, even far-fetched. well, that such a problem was not raised, people rather said how they could take part, you just need to be able to explain it, because the majority there will

be just representatives of labor collectives. here is a specific example. hmm about a third is a deputy and, moreover, of all levels of the village councils and the president insisted that we preserve the village council in the constitution, this is the one, the first level, when a person encounters a representative of the authorities or, on the contrary, takes on part of this power, becoming a deputy from the village council bc, the national assembly of the house of representatives of the council of the republic and that is not the representatives of labor collectives. where do our deputies come from? in our country, deputies work only in the house of representatives with take a look at the rest of the production, these are doctors, teachers, businessmen. uh, these are people from this or that collective, well, let's take our main , uh, civil society actors, who will send trade union representatives to their representatives. well, a trade union is the flesh of the flesh of labor collectives. this is basically the work of

the belarusian republican youth union. and where we have young people in the audience and in labor collectives, they will also move away, the same applies to the veterans of white russia of the women's union, this is representatives of these groups. and why do we have a question, when is a public association at all. if not they put forward with us the same director of the enterprise has quite a lot of worries about the economy and the provision of jobs for the sale of products. i can list further. we are still the management and, uh, the team has a task than the organization. here is the election. and why are there trade unions in this collective then, and why did they nominate their deputy from this collective either by collecting signatures or directly from the collective. this is their voice their voice will be represented by the entire belarusian national assembly, so there is logic here. it seems obvious to me. it seems to me that one more point should be emphasized, president. e drew attention to it well, delegates. it is not just that

all the belarusian people's assembly should participate. they must then come to their labor collectives and report back. that is, they must then work with them. that may be what we lacked before the constitutional referendum, and before this law we had e we were delegates, but now we have worked out all the belarusian people's assembly. let's let's be honest, let's go. here you took part once and that's it. no. now you are for the entire duration of the entire belarusian people's assembly. what is the responsibility to those who nominated you first of all? it's not just you being present. communicated with like-minded people, worked there 1 2 3 more days, listened to the president, asked questions, discussed the program of socio-economic development. you are responsible for the implementation of this decision and, moreover, the powers that we vest in the entire belarusian people's assembly. they huge, this is actually such a collective body, uh, in the hands of which the fate of our

country will be. including even in the most difficult situations, the political party is good, the second part of the second normative document, which was discussed here for myself clearly. which parties should remain. that's what we discussed a lot on this topic, yes, and we had different points of view. look here. let's compare with those countries. where did the political parties come from? in fact, they are reborn there, of those parties that we study in the course, classical political science, which was written about by scientists representatives of political science in the middle of the 20th century. well, they don't. well, take it any, but oh well, there is an american system, it is special. well, take the french parties, but where are those classical socialists and gaullists communists now new movements are being created. uh, very fast dynamics of political life, everything changes, and we are often offered. no , let's go back. here

we will create something to that scheme of the fifties. we must, firstly, look at the trends, and secondly, proceed from our own interests , the party should not divide society. it should represent the interests of a significant part of society, not necessarily all, but not to divide the party should not demand the overthrow of the constitutional order. it can and should criticize the government, if it is not itself the government, but it cannot lead to a civil split in the party; it cannot be financed, and abroad the party cannot be an instrument of an individual oligarch or hierarchical groups; it cannot be bought some big businessman. these are the key requirements, but the party must also have some kind of ideology. a party cannot be created just to take part in this or that electoral campaign. this is a very serious demand that the party must represent the whole of society. er, well, not necessarily. that's right, all citizens.

but if this is a party, it should be in minsk, and it should be in vitebsk in all regions, except for the regional level. we have districts, but if not in all then, well, at least in the third there should be structures, when it comes out a man says i am a representative of one party or another. we must understand. yes , there are at least 10 behind him, they have 20-30 thousand members of the party. this is the program we understand with whom we are dealing, and if the party was created in order to cut grants or satisfy someone's ambitions, why does the belarusian society need such a party and most importantly, god forbid, if this arises, it's in run way of manipulating our political system, usually from abroad. here are the clear barriers. do you think we've already got rid of from random parties. here's a new look, not yet, not yet, not yet. uh, let's wait for the adoption of the law, then, as i

understand it, the procedure for re-registration of the party should go through, probably some parties will leave. even obviously there will be new parties. uh, i don't know. can we talk about, uh, concrete examples here? well, i would still say, look how they showed themselves. the communist party works according to the norms, and many have tried to impose such an image. eh, this party is from the past. yes, this is it. where does it come from, only old people, well, there are old people. well, look how many young sheets appeared in the bright recognizable liberal democratic party. how it works, yes, yes, there are ambitions about white russia. well, let's see how the situation will develop. i see that there is. eh, some ideological ones. well, no matter how associations, but niches based on our constitutional system, which is not yet represented at the party level, it means that they may have appeared. i like your thought that was said. that's when we started

discussing this block. uh, it's really not the vns, nor the party, they are the president, in fact not needed, personal to them. yes, they do not need him as reinforcements. indeed, in fact, the president has always communicated directly with the people, and this was his main distinguishing feature. here, in essence. we are talking about the fact that they should become the same parties, uniting them with such a uniting principle for protection against external threats, as if observing the main principle, everything is in the interests of their state. now, if we clearly understand this and convey this moment, probably, well, it seems to me, then the understanding will be correct. let's get straight let's say alexander lukashenko is the creator. here is that independent sovereign belarus as we know it. i think it's hard for anyone to argue with that. and now he understands. time is changing and belarus is changing, and he wants to define, uh, that political model, including the model of the social model of our development, which will remain for many, uh, years ahead and

we are interested in this. this is where the president's interest coincides with the public interest. uh-huh i got such an idea pushed. here, look, we have been for several years in a row we tell, including as part of the work of lecturers, yes or there speakers. eh, we already had a lecturer. i remember well in the truth mode, people talked well and reacted well thanks to the people sitting here, including this, after all, this was such a collective work in fact. look, we have been talking about the manual for several years. sharpe yes, and 50 years will already be as follows does not work. look, well, yes, and essentially 2020 . yes, he made a professional out of us, those who are already beginning to really understand what happened, how it happened and what we are on. in fact, not unique in all this, but we were the only ones who turned out to be too tough for the smell, because i am very as he says

, the shower warms a little, maybe we already have our own training manual in the knowledge society , and not antisharpa? yes, but on lukashenka's manual there is such a request, and m-m it is obvious to do this, i will just share with you an observation you have in your twentieth year. well, in general, we spoke today in the belarusian character. there is such a character, we don’t like to brag or show our own there , on the contrary, somewhere something hide. well, you know that there, uh, and the neighbors did not envy, and so, well, just in case, so as not to climb. well, sometimes belarusians are not often treated like that, uh, and i noticed that there are a lot of colleagues in russia and even in foreign countries. although it is to explore this experience, but do it so carefully. inviting to some events or you come here, and not immediately, but gradually speaks. and how did it happen for you, what did you do, and why did they do it this way and how it turned out and really

look at us very seriously, not only adversaries, but also allies or potential allies. this belarusian experience is highly valued. and i think that we are already in lectures somewhere, talking at international conferences. e, including with statesmen of foreign countries outlined this experience. eh, well, it's probably time to generalize it and propose it in the form of some kind of possible one. i just won't do research. don't just sprinkle stupid. i have stressed one point all the time writing until now this information is hanging free encyclopedia. yes, like wikipedia about what in order to to cope with that information war information struggle in the twentieth here, flew in. yes, a few. journalist, yes, and who provided this informational victory, and in fact, when we understand that we did it ourselves. uh, it's

well worth the availability of information. yes, i want to ask, you were the dean of the faculty, you know how to communicate with young people. here are our enemies. they didn't calm down. they are very much counting on the younger generation, which by the electoral campaign will have right to vote. yes, and the right to choose. they need such new blood to replace the one that either figured out the situation or sat down, as they say, yes. here, are you going to use fashionable internet platforms and talks in the same tiktok about the same genocide, continuing the previous questions here in order to be successful, do not try to be fashionable, but because there will only be an external form no result and no need work according to methodology. and there must be inspiration and there must be here is an understanding , you know, like the military, they say you want win, knowing the charter, but i fight not according to the charter.

here you must understand the algorithm of actions, what you must do, but if you catch only according to the charter, nothing will work. if you don’t know, the joint won’t work either, so we need to understand. this basis should be knowledge and a sense of the situation. well, we see how our president works. and as for the youth for 2 years. i’ll tell you, quite a lot has been honestly done, and we even see how the enemy reacts to this , uh, i won’t just be in my company speak knowledge. we work very closely with the ministry of education. look, the anthem is being performed in schools . very serious systemic work is underway in historical education in patriotic education . we are already seeing the results i have talked to our military. and they emphasize that even the call has begun

to change. these are the guys who are joining the army now. well, the armed forces in general. and this is good. i would even e said well, not all the problems. of course, we decided here in the youth world. this is by no means , but you can’t help but see the trends that are positive for the more problematic age from 30 to 45. let’s say these former or young people who left not so long ago because of that age, and whom we missed somewhere here in those years when perhaps they underestimated the significance of ideology, they were a little embarrassed to talk about patriotism, at least as we do it now, questions of the historical education of culture. let's just say it straight, and then our ideological adversaries. there was simply dominance, well, you must admit from the first to 2003, practically the word idea, let's say. here we are now, uh, we know our relationship to bullish symbolism, right? the twentieth year, the beginning of the

nineteenth, let alone in the city center a store next to the academy of the ministry of internal affairs on masherov avenue, where everything is freely sold. and not only there you fly out at the airport. that's where it all is. it is sold virtually freely. here's what happened recently. and so, the generation that was formed in that period was young young. it is even necessary to work with them, maybe more in-depth than although with all categories, of course. uh, you need to work, but we can see from sociology that this is at least another one, okay then. if not new, then working form. yes, not informing the attitude towards them is different. well one of the biggest critics in front of you is how we do it. well, here you will agree largely depends on the specific speakers correctly, who are traveling correctly to a specific team. i might give you a lift first a little. firewood into this fire, and then you will

kindle it. yes, i am gasoline, i will tell you my impression, when i come to the team to perform, it is very important for me that the team is not selected in such a way that it is absolutely smooth. i want to have tough questions. and sometimes it still seems to me that these people are simply afraid to be introduced into this team, and there is such a thing, of course, it’s good. why? you are the most critical of me and i consider myself to be such, because i had to go through all the stages. eh, this form of work. e has been implemented with us since 2003 the year when systemic politics actually began. here in march 2003, the beginning of the state ideological policy was a big seminar, the president signed decrees for this and off i was a teacher who was engaged in this work. i was one of the leaders of the youth union, who also came at the information day. you correctly

said that he was also the dean of the union of journalists. we were engaged in this, worked in the media , that is, i can see how it is organized, often there is a lot of formalism. that's what we write for. we talked about training manuals, because every day of informing they write an appropriate brochure, relying on which, creatively, processing this information, it is necessary to convey the point of view that we sometimes get it. they just take and read out the hearing of the team, what we want to achieve. so it's better, in general, not to hold such a day of informing , than to conduct a question. our speakers, recognizable hyped in copper, of course, will not arrive exactly on the day of information for each team. although we believe in there are a lot of bright people in the region. this year we held belarus 1. what wonderful historians do we have in the regions? well, i’m amazing, in fact, that is, these people are local, maybe they are not so, recognizable at the national level, by the way, that’s television, we need to raise them and

invite them here to minsk from mogilev in vitebsk yes , there are definitely these people we see them now, by the way, during our actions. we saw them, yes, it is your societies, in my opinion. can give us the text of the speakers who today a day was not enough ready to do it and we will do it. these are not empty words. so continuing the day of informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy directors for ideological work and how we appoint them to a person who simply reads this manual aloud. he probably shouldn't be in this position. it is rightly said that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well , the word is such a commodity, but this person must be unique, i understand, you can’t pick up such people everywhere , so we need to think here how to convey, maybe, uh, and it’s not honorable, uh, with these activities. let's do it in one day . there are three and a half thousand meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and

then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk, to introduce seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy, they spilled where we invite bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online in the form, when we have a person who understands this problem through online can cover? docks krug e our teams we offer it. you see, even one beautiful tad-presentation, as you had in the truth mode. here you come with this one, you don’t need to collect everyone. well, one speaker will come to the district on the topic of the information day and believe me, the whole district will know, there is no need to gather everyone there, there are 150 enterprises of people, the whole district will know, but it is important to live here the second part, so that officials and representatives of state authorities actually went out. these are two lines. this speaker is an expert who understands a particular problem and representatives of state authorities,

for whom the day of informing is a way to communicate to learn about the problems of the team to answer people's requests. it does not always work out, yet, but we should think about improving this work. and in principle, if you like, our state ideological policy. that's in the broadest sense of the word. this is an informative and legal basis for the form of the method of work of organizational staffing . we need to restart, firstly, from those normative acts that were adopted back in the third and fourth year. wow, how much time has passed. the twentieth year has taught us a lot now on life teaches, and therefore, to me it seems the time has come. uh, not only such a serious big conversation, but the solution, uh, in this part, we had a seminar in june under the leadership of the president on work. here is this explanatory very sound thought. the president also spoke there at this seminar. e, noted the direction of the work and made a remark and criticized, but already

half a year has passed. it seems to me, especially a year before the electoral campaign of our single day. which will be in 24, just the time has come for such a systematization of all this work and our achievements and shortcomings. a and. that's what we said restart, if you like, maybe a provocative question. now yes, but i knew others and do not expect knowledge before, significantly 2/3 of all lectures were paid. yes, this is the system assumed in your knowledge society. yes, and they now have paid lectures. i understand such a question always as well, here, let's just have an ideology . well let's just say it straight. no, somewhere, maybe, and uh, the load, of course, as a public one. i'll tell you straight. we have all the performances within the framework, and the companies clarification of the constitution all were free it all was this. well, here is a civil call, a

patriotic call, all people work like that, but at the same time. well, let's take our expert. well, let's say it's up to the price. in the knot, well , firstly, he needs to break away from his main activity, often, this is a trip somewhere outside the same minsk if he himself is from minsk yes, and on the territory in minsk he needs to prepare very seriously for this, this is an emotional cost and intellectual should they be compensated. well, why not, if all the more, uh, our enterprises have allocated funds for this? after all, if the company orders, as we said, one color or another. well, his expenses for this work should be compensated from my point of view. this is correct. here is how to organize this work, and again, at a new level, we are now discussing such agreements, and many of our trade union organizations and enterprises conclude directly. eh, but we see that it still

needs to be generalized in some way, again put on a new basis. speakers here, perhaps in this situation, many themselves want listen, i this was such a case we are on the talk show vladimir rudolfovich. solovyov somehow mentioned this possibility when everyone arrived home. everyone says we will come. i think that our audience is waiting here, by the way, and certain surprises our phone cut off , they say when we are sad and hurt. ugh, here it is. here i am talking in belarus here we are, sometimes we appreciate someone else's, well, the russians are not completely strangers to us, but there in moscow or somewhere else. well, let's say. it's the same as with a musical artist will be here sing perform. you know this very well, as soon as fr. o. you see, you will play in our theater, well, the circle of theater-goers will know, as soon as somewhere not even in the series in moscow at the theater. as it is customary to say there, they will appear, well, you see, they took it, this is how we feel it, as

soon as you become more likely to speak on moscow talk shows, as it were of course, let's talk about it directly, but at the same time i want to say that the level our specialists experts on the vast majority of problems the volume is very high here and can be seen on the same russian talk shows. you were the dean of the faculty of philosophy of the philosophy of the social sciences, philosophy, sociology, psychology, social communications, social work with the key word philosophy, it is for everyone, as it were, understandable, and does not say anything, but still, yes, and the latter are about philosophical question, despite the fact that i would like to talk for a long time, but today the fight against russia has become a trend, right? not we, of course, once the trend was the minsk agreements and the end of the war. yes, in the donbass for the sake of new trends in the fight against russia, wars with russia changed their shoes. even very strong

politicians, as we thought. well, like merkel, she smoked her attempts to repaint. sorry for such a very precise word many western politicians. they no longer stand in the same row. don't give up golem , no chipping, no statcher or with a shredder. i'm not saying that they can't stand on a par with ours. this is what needs to happen today in order for new european leaders to appear who, first of all, will think about their country, about their people, about national interests. here's how to make it an international trend? it will certainly be its own special military operation. it became a test for everyone, for russia, for us, for the west , and for the processes that were latent. they came out that we are seeing the culture of the abolition of russia and belarus is fascism. this is fascism, this is

xenophobia, which they are trying to justify with some pseudo-democratic slogans, the fascisization of europe, we see it and we can prove it fascisation is not necessary, the fascist party and the national socialist or there is no hyper musalini, read eco's mri read other european thinkers. how did they describe it? and how does it happen? unfortunately, we see this happening. yes , the leaders were crushed, but i am not a supporter of these conversations that all this is the end of europe, i am convinced that new ones will appear. well, others. you see, when they copy as they tried, johnson is copying somewhere, churchill well, there is a population track. i will give examples of orbans. why not? yes, this is a bright politician, and our opponent is an ideological political ill-wisher of

belarus, and the same kachinsky, is he not bright, and by the way, many in poland hate, and many idolize erdogan. it's not exactly europe, but nonetheless. and now he returned to politics again, and berlusconi is ours, well, older, but this is our generation of ours, well, our contemporary is convinced that this will appear, as it happens, life will force life to simply ignore those challenges like ostriches hide their heads repeat, like barrel delusional slogans. uh, over and over again , you understand, barrel stoltenberg ursula fonderland is already some kind of comic characters. they don’t decide anything with russia, but constantly reproduces some kind of, uh, some kind of information, yes, if you can call it that and that’s it, but it’s not they who decide the time will come for strong leaders, when those