good evening, good evening, exactly 22 years before my birthday on may 1, 1947, an appeal was published by a group of soviet scientists, cultural workers, public figures with a proposal to create an all-union society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. yep, social science. let's just say it's not outdated. today, firstly, marat sergeevich looks good with mathematics, and the same society is spreading not only public political knowledge, but also scientifically. well, in a sense, of course, scientifically. so that we invite you. why not yet among our lecturers, but in fact, yes, there were such conversations even in soviet times and social science. it was on the one hand, recognizable on the other hand. as they say, youth has become a meme. well, remember, this figured in soviet comedies, but this does not mean that it was something so bad or wrong, on the contrary. it was very much in demand by the society. caught

social science lecturers while still very young. i remember when they came to us and told us quite interesting things, but i i'm not talking about the library of social studies. imagine, recently, uh, graduate students asked me, and how lecturers used to prepare, when there was no internet, and this is how the social studies library was, there were these amazing brochures, where information was summarized. yes. there, in different countries on various problems, and with this they really armed the facts with arguments, and the newspaper was not in vain. that was the name of arguments and facts, and who knows, yes, it was the official absolutely correct body of society, knowledge itself, by the way, even went out in circulation in these three million. yes, well, that's it, you know, it's true again, so i invite you to become our lecturer. i don't reach. people are waiting for you. eh, but at the same time, in the nineties, they wanted to abandon the knowledge society, as well as other soviet traditions, but life itself showed that this was necessary. you need to come to people

live to talk to explain to convey your point of view. look how synchronously the processes of the revival of social science are going on both in russia and in russia, you can ask, but how in other countries? uh huh just called in another way, here are the traditions of educational clubs, communities, they are very common. that's generally the structures within the individual lands. germany has a structure. similar to social studies are called educational centers there. somehow, here we often represent classic english clubs, you know, these are sitting gentlemen, they smoke cigars and drink. e tea, er, whiskey, i probably don’t know and then hunts for a leaf of nothing like that in fact, and classic english clubs are educational structures. i'm not talking about the european tradition, and the enlightenment there, in broad working masks, spoke of the organization of various courses. this is what social science is. and for many political parties, the topic

is now very relevant for belarus, the development of political parties, and so, many political parties have appropriate educational or research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes, it created not only public leaders, yes, but even screen heroes. yes, through the same outstanding actor balala yes, a favorite of women, yes, that is, there sixties, but knowledge in recent years has not had bright public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, they will not even name the leaders of the knowledge society of the soviet union or the belarusian republican and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? to become a media conductor of knowledge in society well, i think that several factors have converged here at once, but first of all, yes, the first part of

your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, maybe the leaders. no need to know which academician, for example, headed social studies, that academician vavilov stood at the base there, konstantin simonov, the famous poet, that is, this initiative came from them, it is important that they know the lecturer, the president himself was both a lecturer in social studies and an executive secretary then at school, that is, he organized this job. he understands that it is so important that we want to name the speakers, you want to name them, the lecturers are classical, and the people who come to the audience charge. and what is called establishing contact. these are the people we have we have them and we are actively inviting them as part of the events that we hold. let's take two of ours, probably, over the past year, the largest and most basic actions by which we are recognized,

which we are proud of, belarus 1 and belarus 1 in the pravda regime. it appeared e. well, somewhere spontaneously. that's just a big conversation with the president, where he raised the issue of the knowledge society. oh, and already in august-september on the eve of our first day of national unity on september 17th. we decided to go through the regions and we saw that shpakovsky dermant avdonin. i can continue to list these are those people who are recognized, who are trusted, and who are listened to and who are expected, that is, we can say that it is right to order them in a good way. yes, we work by order in a broad sense, according to the social order and specifically of certain organizations, and in fact often they order not some kind of lecture, but this or that person. here we are waiting. let him come to us, and we will continue to continue. borovik. petrovsky a. bilyaev that's what makes me happy, journalists have appeared, who are waiting for a little light, smooth

tour indeed. and they know how to communicate with, uh, the audience, the audience listens to them completely or not quite agrees to argue, discusses. it is very important. look how many people like this we have. e in the deputy corps. and so you need to work with them for them. if you like, you need to create a platform matrix to offer a model of working methods, because we have also established even this year or two and the form of work, be it a dialogue platform. whether it's a lecture. it is necessary to change it is necessary to change the format of reporting information. let it be a little, but nevertheless, that is, this forum was such a shot. yes, it must be repeated, and in that form e you look. here in february, on the eve of the vote on the constitution, we had a large forum in the pravda regime in the sports palace, and on september 17. eh, there was something similar to e in well dedicated to history, this is our history in minsk on september 17

- this was carried out under the auspices of the ministry of culture. we partially participated there, but we saw that such formats are in demand among people vladimirovich here. see. we now we are talking about speakers. they are more or less even professionally trained, but in the same ussr there was galina ulanova yes, a ballerina a ballerina. yes, it can be called silver now. yes, they would. but i know who you see now as the headliner of the renewed society. you know, it's interesting, they mentioned about ballerinas, as if you were reading our plans. although i know that i was not shared. yes, we are now working very actively with our big theatre. e with e. ekaterina dulova about interaction and forms of information submission here

musical theatrical methods, and i really like the way we worked. i also see that people are in demand on the stage of the kupala theater, when in august of this year our kupala patriotic forum was held. and we even interact with the national beauty school. we see, i ’ll say it directly, maybe even looking ahead. here is our famous merch of the first teloghan, which is written, with which we go out, because behind each of these slogans there is an idea. behind each of these slogans there is a certain message, this appeal and it can be revealed based on it is possible to convey this or that information to an idea, it can be embodied in different forms, and we try these forms. and in working with the audience. you have an understanding, if we remember the social science of the soviet union, we understand. there were 2,000 academicians, there were more than 200,000 doctors. yes, there were 400,000

engineers, yes, who took part in one way or another in the work of social science. we understand that in order to come to the same audience of cultural workers. yes , it is desirable that a person has certain knowledge in this area and speaks the same language with them. language. you have such an understanding, but if he talks about the topic of cultures, because we have cultural workers, i had to speak. eh, workers in the sphere of culture, if you are talking about geopolitics or economics, you should first of all analyze another issue in this. you correctly point out that when you communicate with people, you must understand who you are talking to. and speak to them in a language they understand and understand , although i will tell you. right now, on the eve of the seventy-fifth anniversary, we have organized such a marathon of lectures on on the basis of the academy of management, a series of lectures on the national idea of ​​geopolitics , economics, and historical continuity. and this is a very profound lecture. it's because, you know, we have sometimes. they want to follow the audience, they just want to captivate, but it is important that

there is knowledge and understanding of arguments and we have organized such a series of lectures, and we see how people perceive them, we will continue this lecture hall . you have already mentioned that the president was an active lecturer in social studies and in the year 78 it was he who became a responsible secret shklov regional organization. yes, the society is now becoming the head of the republican. social science yes, you certainly raised the archives. yes, and interested. by this very fact, of course, i am grateful to our archival workers. we looked at the materials. and by the way, we also looked at newspaper publications, because social science has always been actively reflected in the media, as it is now. here. you, when you said that you had not heard anything for several years, but this communication was not organized. i don't say who's to blame there knowledge or themselves. well, this fact is just very important to interact. by the way, when the society was created in the forty-seventh year,

one of the tasks was to widely publish in the media, including, interestingly, the transcripts of the lecture. this is such a task that we can say that lecturer lukashenka was expected. uh, his information was trusted to the audience what we now know was always crowded, he was preparing for a lecture. this is very important. uh worked with relevant literature. here is what we see, for that time and i am convinced that the formation of the personality of our president is of his certain style. that time of work and the responsible secretary, the electric motor wife had more time than, uh, holding a full-time position in the knowledge society. so this had a big impact on him. ok then. in 2007, by his decree, the president transformed the public association of knowledge into a republican state

public association. oh well, this is status, and with your appointment in the twenty-first year. yes, in fact, he breathed new life into it. well let's talk straight. i do n’t bow before you, i say what is what i see, i’ll sincerely appreciate clairvoyance. president, he knows what will be needed in the future, and i'm not just talking about your organization. well, you will agree, what is anti-privatization alone worth, yes, a state-owned enterprise and pandemics, when we were not driven by moisture. when he really wanted to, but how do you explain these things to yourself? this is some kind of special knowledge. well, first of all, with regard to attention of the president to our society my feel and the decree was not only the seventh year, but also last year in november. they just supported us. well, i set specific tasks, and they are promising, but also demanding, which we must do in the field of historical knowledge of political and scientific popularization

of science. of course, we will fulfill the goals and tasks that have been set, but speaking of president lukashenko, of course, this is a very big intuition. it's important, that we don't learn. this is an innate feeling. then great everyday experience is huge that's why the president always says you need to go from life, because there should be no artificiality there should be desire. well , you know, you need to indulge in something rational, which is characteristic of our belarusian nature of reasoning, but christmas trees. well maya be anchor sparrow whipping not only to you, cheering. uh, where do you live? and this is a clear understanding that is peculiar to us, it is inherent in the president, of course, this is a huge store of knowledge. certainly ah and trust

in specialists, because look at the time of the same covid-19, there have always been specialists next to the president. in this area. these are not some arbitrary decisions. they are based on an in- depth analysis of the information provided by specialists, and only after that one or another decision is made. on tuesday, the president held an important meeting to bring individual laws in line with the updated constitution. these are two important documents. were considered is the law on the supreme people's council, and the entire belarusian people's assembly and the law on political parties. here are the main messages you have already heard for yourself not debatable, but those that are necessary for deep reflection, understanding and communication to people. and now, you must agree, your task is precisely this when

we discussed the changes to the add-on. the constitution, just the same issues relating to the entire belarusian people's assembly were among the leading ones in discussion. yes, people asked, what is it for what is it already, when we held dialogue platforms in the fall. why is it necessary that the entire belarusian people's assembly did not ask if there was understanding, there is understanding, and the question arose only there, how form. eh, how will it be directly? yes, how will it work? here, as it seems, the main thing is not lukashenko who needs the belarusian people's assembly. it is not necessary for the presidential power, it is necessary for the country, for which, to ensure the stable development of society, to ensure continuity and as a vivid embodiment of the true principle of democracy.

unfortunately, the model of democracy that is offered to us, and more often imposed by the west, is a manipulative model, we see how it actually happens. this is the model of the oligarchy, which is a variety of cunning technologies. he is trying to explain to the people, but to create the illusion that the people are involved in governance, we are really laying the whole belarusian people's assembly, uh, the principle of our true democracy that we associate it with our traditions. this is no coincidence. here i will not even touch the evening. take the 20th century, our belarusian experience, the all-belarusian congress of the 17th year. it was in a non-parliamentary form, but the people got together and claimed their right to live in their own land and determine how we live. take the people’s assembly of western belarus in the thirty -ninth year, thanks to which we united in one state, it had tremendous legitimacy, and we

can see this from the documents of any historian who has come across the history of the people’s gathering of gangways and belarus will confirm that it was a genuine people’s representation in ninety sixth year in full swing. we remember the islands of constitutional political crisis. the people's assembly is all belarusian. the people's assembly played a huge role in the twentieth year in february. that is, it is already now we are shaping our historical experience, including that of recent history, into a legislative form, that is, not something illusory, but something that already exists, something that has already been worked out and is laying a certain perspective. yes, we are pioneers here, but there is no need to be afraid of this, since we still rely on our understanding of our political system. and how to ensure the main principle that the people should be the source of power is good, but the main reproach that yes is thrown at the authorities is that

labor collectives. will not be presented practically as part of vns, the president spoke very clearly about this, how you will bring it up. eh, i'll tell you that when we had discussions now. here, uh, reproach, even far-fetched. well, that such a problem was not raised, people rather said how to take part, you just need to be able to explain it, because there the majority will be just the same representatives of the labor collective. here is a concrete example. hmm , about a third is a deputy and, moreover, at all levels of the village councils and the president insisted that we be preserved in the constitution the village council is the one, the first level, when a person encounters a representative of authority or vice versa takes on part of this power, becoming a deputy from the village council to the national assembly of the house of representatives council of the republic and this is not representatives of labor collectives. where do

our deputies come from? we have deputies only in the house of representatives they work with a break from work, all the rest , look, these are doctors, teachers, businessmen. eh, there are people from this or that team, well, let's take our main uh, civil society actors who will send their trade union representatives. well, a trade union is the flesh of the flesh of labor collectives. this is, in principle, the labor collection of the belarusian republican youth union. and where we have young people in the audience and in labor collectives, they will also be avoided, the same applies to the veterans of white russia of the women's union, these are the representatives of these collectives. and why do we have a question, when is a public association at all. if not they push us the same director of the enterprise has quite a lot of worries about the economy and the provision of jobs for the marketing of products. i can list further. we still have a management and, uh, a team must uh task

than an organization. here is the election. and why are there trade unions in this collective then, and why did they nominate their deputy from this collective either by collecting signatures or directly from the collective. this is their voice, their voice will be presented to the entire belarusian national assembly, so there is logic here. it seems obvious to me. i think it needs to be emphasized one moment the president. e drew attention to it well, delegates. it is not just that all the belarusian people's assembly should participate. they must then come to their labor collectives and report back. that is, they must then work with them. that may be what we lacked before the constitutional referendum, and before this law we had e we were delegates. well, we have worked out all the belarusian people's gathered. let's be honest, let's go. here you took part once and that's it. no. now you are all over validity of the entire belarusian people's assembly. what is the responsibility to those who nominated you first of all? it's not just you being present.

communicated with like-minded people, worked there 1 2 3 more days, listened to the president, asked questions, discussed the program of socio-economic development. you are responsible for the implementation of this decision and, moreover, the powers that we vest in the entire belarusian people's assembly. they are huge, in fact, such a collective body, uh, in the hands of which the fate of our countries. including even in the most difficult situations a good political party. yes , the second part of the second normative document that was discussed. here's a clear one for you. which parties should remain. that's what we discussed a lot on this topic, yes, and we had different points of view. look here. let's compare with those strange ones. where did political parties come from to us, because in fact, they were reborn there of those parties that we study in the course, classical political science, about which they wrote, scientists representatives of political science in the middle

xx century. well, they don't. well, take it any, but oh well, there is an american system, it is special. well, take the french parties, but where are those classical socialists, galist communists, new movements are now being created. uh, very fast dynamics of political life, everything changes, and we are often offered. no , let's go back. here we will create something to that scheme of the fifties. we must, firstly, look at the trends, and secondly, proceed from our own interests , the party should not divide society. she should represent the interests of a significant part of society, not necessarily everything, but not to divide the party should not demand the overthrow of the constitutional order. it can and should criticize the government if it is not itself the government, but it cannot lead to a civil split in the party; it cannot be financed, and abroad the party cannot

be an instrument of an individual oligarch or oligarchic groups; it cannot be bought by some big businessman, these are the key requirements, but the party must also have some kind of ideology; the party cannot be created only to take part in one or another electoral campaign. and this is a very serious demand that the party must represent the whole of society. er, well, not necessarily. that's right, all citizens. but if this is a party, it should be in minsk, and it should be in vitebsk in all regions, except for the regional level. we have districts, but if not in all of them, well, at least in the third there should be structures, when a person comes out, he says, i am a representative of one party or another. we must understand. yes for him costs at least 10, they have 20-30 thousand members of the party. this is the program we understand with whom we are dealing, and if the party was created in order to cut grants or satisfy someone's ambitions, why

does the belarusian society need such a party and most importantly, god forbid, if this arises, it's in run way of manipulating our political system, usually from abroad. here are the clear barriers. you think that we have already got rid of random parties. here's a new look, not yet, not yet, not yet. uh, let's wait the adoption of the law, then, as i understand it, the procedure for re-registration of the party must go through, probably some parties will leave. even obviously there will be a new party. uh, i don't know. can we talk about, uh, concrete examples here? well, i would still say, look how they showed themselves. the communist party works according to the norms, and many have tried to impose such an image. eh, this party is from the past. yes, this is it. where does it come from, only the old people, well, if the old people, well, look how many young sheets of bright recognizable liberal-democratic the consignment. how it works, yes, yes, there are ambitions

about white russia. well, let's see how the situation will develop. i see that there is. eh, some ideological ones. well, no matter how associations, but niches based on our constitutional system, which is not yet represented at the party level, it means that they may have appeared. i like your thought that was said. that's when we started discussing this block. eh, after all, it’s really not the vns, nor the party, the president does n’t really need them, they are personal. yes, he does not need them as portraits. after all, in fact, the president is always communicated directly with the people, and this was his main distinguishing feature. here, in essence. we are talking about the fact that they should become the same parties, uniting them with such a uniting principle for protection against external threats, as if observing the main principle, everything is in the interests of their state. now, if we clearly understand this and convey this moment, probably, well, it seems to me, then the understanding will be correct. let's just

say alexander lukashenko, he is the creator. here is that independent sovereign belarus, how we we know. i think it's hard for anyone to argue with that. and now he understands. time is changing, and belarus is changing, and he wants to define, uh, that political model, including the model of the social model of our development, which will remain for many years to come, and we are interested in this. this is where the president's interest coincides with the public interest. uh-huh i got such an idea pushed. here, look, we have been talking for several years in a row, including as part of the work of lecturers, yes, or there are speakers, ah, here we have already been a lecturer. i remember in in the pravda mode, we had a good conversation, people reacted well thanks to the people sitting here, including this, after all, this was such a collective work in fact. look, we have been talking about the manual for several years. sharpe yes, and 50 years will already be as follows does not

work. look, well, yes, and essentially 2020 . yes, he made a professional out of us, those who are already beginning to really understand what happened, how it happened and that we are not really unique in all this, but we turned out to be the only ones who were not the smell of teeth, because i am very as he says, the shower warms a little, maybe we are already in the society of knowledge. your methodology your methodology. yes, and not anti-sharpa? yes, but to name lukashenka's training manual there is such a request, and m-m it is obvious to do this, i will share with you just an observation. that's from the twentieth year. well, in general, today we talked about the belarusian character, there is such a character. we do not like to brag or show our own there, on the contrary, we will hide something somewhere. well, you know that there are e and neighbors did not envy, and so, well, just in case, so as not to jinx it. well, sometimes

belarusians are not often treated like that, uh, and i noticed that a lot of colleagues in russia and even in foreign countries want to study this experience, but they do it so carefully. inviting to some events or coming here and now, not immediately, but gradually speaks. and how did it happen for you, what did you do, and why did they do it this way and how it turned out and indeed, not only opponents, but also allies or potential ones are looking at us very seriously allies. this belarusian experience is very valuable. i think that we are already in lectures somewhere, talking at international conferences. e, including with statesmen of foreign countries outlined this experience. eh, well, it's probably time to generalize it and propose it in the form of some kind of possible one. i just won't do research. don't just sprinkle stupid. i have stressed one

point all the time writing until now this information is hanging free encyclopedia. yes, like wikipedia that in order to deal with that information war information struggle in the twentieth here, flew in. yes, a few. journalist, yes, and who provided this informational victory, and in fact, when we understand that we did it ourselves. uh, it's well worth the availability of information. yes, i want to ask, you were the dean of the faculty, you know how to communicate with young people. here are our enemies. they didn't calm down. they very much count on the younger generation, which will have the right to vote before the electoral campaign. yes, and the right to choose. they need such new blood to replace the one that either figured out the situation, or sat down, as they say, yes. so, are you going to use fashionable internet platforms and talks in the same tiktok about the same

genocide, continuing the previous ones the question is , in order to be successful, you don’t have to try to be fashionable, but because there will only be an external form no result and no need work according to methodology. and there must be inspiration and there must be understanding. you know, like the military, they say you want to win, knowing the charter, but i'm not fighting according to the charter. here you must understand the algorithm of actions, what you must do, but if you speak only according to the charter, nothing will work. if you don’t know, the joint won’t work either, so we need to understand. this basis should be knowledge and a sense of the situation. well, we see how our president works. and as for the youth for 2 years. let me tell you, quite a lot has been honestly done, and we even see how the enemy reacts to this , uh, i will not only speak knowledge in my society. uh, we work very closely with the ministry of education.

look, the anthem is being sung in schools , and very, uh, serious systematic work is underway in historical education in patriotic education, a new discipline. the block is being introduced brightly enough, our union with the youth is working. we are already seeing the results i have talked to our military. and they emphasize that even the call has begun to change. these are the guys who are joining the army now. well, the armed forces in general. and this is good. i would even say e well, not all problems. of course, we decided here in the youth sphere we don’t want to this is by no means, but one cannot help but see trends that are positive for a more problematic age from 30 to 45. these are, say, former or young people who recently left because of that age, and who somewhere we missed in those years when, perhaps, we underestimated the significance of ideology, we were a little embarrassed to talk about

patriotism, at least as we do now, questions of the historical education of culture. let's put it straight , and then to our ideological opponents. there was just dominance, well agree ninety-first to 2003, practically a word of ideology. let's say. here we are now, uh, we know our relationship to bullish symbolism, right? the twentieth year, the beginning of the nineteenth, let alone in the city center a store next to the academy of the ministry of internal affairs on masherov avenue, where everything is freely sold. and not only there you fly out at the airport. that's where it all is. it is sold virtually freely. here's what happened recently. and so, the generation that was formed in that period was young and young. it’s even necessary to work with them, it can be more in-depth than although with all categories of course. ah, you need to work, but we see from sociology,

this is at least another one. well, then. if not new, then working form. yes, not informing the attitude towards them is different. well one of the biggest critics in front of you is how we do it. well, here you will agree largely depends on the specific speakers correctly, who are traveling correctly to a specific team. maybe i'll give you a little first. firewood into this fire, and then you will kindle it. yes? i'll tell you my impression when i come to the team to perform , it is very important for me that the team is not selected in such a way that it is absolutely smooth. i want to have tough questions. and sometimes it still seems to me that these people are simply afraid to be introduced into this team. yes there is there is, of course, it’s good, why are you the most critical and i consider myself as such, because i had to. eh, go through all the stages. eh, this form

of work. e has been introduced in our country since 2003, when the system policy actually began. here march 2003 the beginning of the state there was a big seminar on ideological politics, the president signed decrees for this, and off and on i was a teacher who was engaged in this work. i was one of the leaders of the youth union, who also came at the information day. you correctly said that he was also the dean of the union of journalists. we were engaged in this, worked in the media , that is, i can see how it is organized, often there is a lot of formalism. that's what we write for. we talked about manuals, because under each day of informing they write, the corresponding brochure, based on which and creatively, processing this information, it is necessary to convey the point of view that we sometimes succeed in it. they just take and read out the hearing of the collective, what we want to achieve. so it's better, in general, not to hold such a day of informing , than to hold a question. our speakers,

recognizable promoted in the media, of course, will not arrive on the day of information for each team. although, believe me, there are a lot of bright people in the region. this year we held belarus 1. what wonderful historians in our regions, i’m, well, amazing, in fact, that is, these people are local, maybe they are not so, recognizable at the national level, by the way, that’s television, we need to raise them and invite them here to minsk from mogilev vitebsk grodno. yes , there certainly are. these people we see them, now we saw them during our actions. yes , it is your society. in my opinion. can give us the text of the speakers who today are not enough ready ready to do it and will do it. these are not empty words. so here continuing the day informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy director for ideological work and how we appoint them to a person who simply reads this manual aloud. he probably shouldn't

be in this position. it is rightly said that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well , the word is such a commodity, but this person must be unique, i understand, you won’t find such people everywhere , so we need to think here how to inform, maybe, uh, and dishonor, uh, with these events. let's go one day let's do it. there are three and a half thousand meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk to introduce seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy of management. where we invite bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online in the form, when we have a person who understands this problem through online can cover? docks krug e our teams we offer it. you understand here. uh, even one beautiful tad presentation like you had in truth mode here you will arrive with this one, you don't have to collect everyone. well, one speaker will come

to the district on the topic of the information day and believe me, the whole district will know, there is no need to gather everyone there, there are 150 enterprises of people, the whole district will know, but it is important to live here the second part, so that officials and representatives of state authorities actually went out. these are two lines. this speaker is an expert who understands a particular problem and representatives of state authorities, for whom the day of informing is a way to communicate to learn about the problems of the team to answer people's requests. it does not always work out, yet, but we should think about improving this work. and in principle, if you like, our state ideological policy. that's in the broadest sense of the word. this is an informative and legal basis for the form of the method of work of organizational staffing . we need to restart, firstly, from those normative acts that were adopted back in the third and fourth year. wow, how much time has passed. the twentieth year has taught us a lot now on life teaches, and therefore, to me

it seems the time has come. uh, not only such a serious big conversation, but the solution, uh, in this part, we had a seminar in june under the leadership of the president on work. here is this explanatory very sound thought. the president also spoke there at this seminar. e, noted the direction of the work and made a remark and criticized, but already half a year has passed. it seems to me, especially a year before the electoral campaign of our single day. which will be in 24, just the time has come for such a systematization of all this work and our achievements and shortcomings. a and. that's what we said restart, if you like, maybe a provocative question. now yes, i knew from others and do not expect knowledge significantly 2/3 of all lectures were paid. yes, this is the system assumed in your knowledge society. yes, and they now have

paid lectures. i understand such a question always as well, here, let's just have an ideology . well, let's just say somewhere, maybe , and uh, the load, of course, as a public one. i'll tell you straight. we have all the performances within the framework, and the companies clarification of the constitution, everything was free of charge , it was all, well, a civil call, a patriotic call, all people work like that, but at the same time. let's take our expert. well, let's say it's up to the price. ace, well , firstly, he needs to break away from his main activity, often, this is a trip somewhere outside the same minsk if he himself is from minsk yes, and on the territory in minsk, he needs to prepare very seriously for this, this is both emotional costs and intellectual should they be compensated. well, why not, if all the more, uh, our enterprises have allocated funds for this? after all, if the company orders, as we

said, this or that gift. well, his expenses for this work should be compensated from my point of view. this is correct. here's how to organize this work, but again on a new level. we are already discussing such agreements, and many of our trade union organizations and enterprises conclude them directly. eh, but we see that it still needs to be generalized in some way, again put on a new basis. speakers here, perhaps in this situation, many themselves want listen, i this was such a case we are on the talk show vladimir rudolfovich. solovyov once mentioned this possibility, when everyone says, we will come. i think that our audience is waiting here, by the way, and certain surprises we have, the phone cut off says when it’s not joyful and insulting. that's all the same. here i say in belarus here we are, sometimes we appreciate someone else's. uh, well, the russians are not completely

foreign to us, but there in moscow or somewhere else. well, let's say. this is the same as with a musical performer will be here to sing to perform. you know very well how they will only call fr. o. you see, you will play in our theater, well, the circle of theater-goers will know, as soon as somewhere not even in the series in moscow at the theater. as it is customary to say there, he will appear, he says, well, you see, they took it, that is, we feel it ourselves, as soon as you become more likely to perform at moscow shows, as it were, out of ten. of course, let's talk about this directly, but at the same time i want to say that the level of our experts in the vast majority of problems is very high and can be seen on the same russian talk shows. you were the dean faculty of philosophy of philosophy of social sciences, philosophy, sociology, psychology, social communication, social work with the keyword philosophy, it is for everyone, as it were, understandable, and does not say anything, but still yes, and the latter are about a philosophical

question, despite to something that i would like to talk for a long time, but today the fight against russia has become a trend, right? not we, of course, once the trend was the minsk agreements and the end of the war. yes, in the donbass, for the sake of new trends in the fight against russia, wars with russia changed their shoes. even very strong we counted politicians. well, like the mercury of france , another attempt to repaint was ugly. sorry for such a very precise word many western politicians. they can no longer stand, in the same row not with de gaulle, we can’t cut off, neither with a stitcher or with a shredder. i'm not saying that they can't stand on a par with ours. this is what must happen today in order for new european leaders to appear who, first of all, will think about their country, their people, and

national interests. here's how to make it an international trend? it will definitely its own special military operation. it became a test for everyone, for russia, for us, for the west , and for the processes that were latent. they came out that we are seeing the culture of the abolition of russia and belarus is fascism. this is fascism, this is xenophobia, which they are trying to substantiate with some pseudo-democratic slogans, the fascisization of europe, we see it and we can prove it fascisation is not necessarily a fascist party and either a national socialist or there is no hitler muslin, read mrtka read other european thinkers. how did they describe it? and how does it happen? unfortunately, we see this happening. yes , the leaders were crushed, but i am not a supporter of these

conversations that all this is the end of europe, i am convinced that new ones will appear. well, others. you see, when they copy as they tried, there johnson is copying somewhere, churchill well, jones and the population trace will give examples of orbans. why not? yes, this is a bright politician, and our opponent is an ideological political ill-wisher of belarus and the same kachinsky, is he not bright, and by the way, many in poland hate, there, many idolize erdogan. it's not exactly europe, but nonetheless. and now he returned to politics again, and berlusconi is ours, well, older, but this is our generation of ours, well, our contemporary is convinced that this will appear, as it happens, life will force life to simply ignore those challenges like ostriches hide their heads repeat, like barrel delusional slogans. uh, over and over again

, you understand, there is barrel stoltenberg. uh, ursula fonderland already some comic characters from ukraine and russia do not solve anything, but they constantly reproduce some kind of, uh, some kind of information, yes, if you can call it that and that’s it, but it’s not they who decide the time will come for strong leaders, when these are the tests we are now putting before, we stand, but the west stands, because he loses harmony he is doomed to defeat. it is inevitable that the center of power is moving to other regions. kraeshek controlled the entire planet will no longer be able to. we see this, the challenge has been thrown, the struggle is hard, but they are historically doomed. and at this critical stage, a new leader will emerge. they may not look like the same degulya and probably will not. maybe they will be military, maybe journalists, maybe the professional politics are different, but the fact

that they will appear in western at least in europe and in the usa is a fact. how to organize meals so that there is enough energy for the whole day at home, i try to cook a balanced meal for breakfast, there were always slow carbohydrates , because children often skip meals at school. usually i eat something based on eggs, scrambled eggs, i like porridge very much. you then take care of the pancakes uh-huh and i'll make the sauce about it and not only the belarusian athletes tell. it ever counted how many sports it documented. and you know, i won’t tell you the exact number, but i

have a suspicion that it’s sports. well, somewhere around 20, probably gathered. how do you find promising future olympic champions culinary project breakfast of champions, watch on belarus 24 tv channel. we pour in the grain, and here the bag is put, everything can be ground, then go to bake pies. they will tell about the amazing polissya way of life at home, they didn’t close such a flask, they threw it on the castle, and everyone knew that there was no one in the house at that time and would share. why did you choose your small homeland for life?

my heart is joyful. everything calms here, and therefore i would never find another place for myself and did not think to find it quietly above the shore , you will notice for a stump, 24. now we are very good at weaving. e is presented by our masters. it is reborn. she saved masha lecture to popularize it. so naturally, not only baskets are woven, they are woven, the most diverse product. here it can be a vase of currents. it could be furniture. these

are some decorative abstract forms for decorating their homes, but not only homes, now such a direction in azo weaving is in great demand. how is culture made in garden parks, it can also be abstract, or maybe in the form of some animals or specific objects, and very uh, now in demand. uh, weaving living products of living trees, they are also called children's roots. we still have the name northern palm, because in its own way, a bris in its outline. they are very similar to palm trees. what is the most difficult thing today? for masters, this is the preparation of material or directly working with it, the most difficult thing, of course, is the preparation. this is just hellish work of their students. from the very beginning, i scare you in all the details, how hard it will be for people to imagine? what awaits them if you weave wild material, it must be found, it grows, it is in such cluttered places somewhere on the

banks of rivers, and lakes must be reached there. it 's already hard, physically. you have to walk there, but it doesn’t grow against it. it’s not the same as in the factory. yes, everything is made one to one , the same length, the same thickness. you just need to find it, then you need to assemble it, tie it on yourself, take it to some car, bring it to the house, and at home we are waiting for more processing. and it must be boiled, debarked, split , planed. it's very very long process. here he is a lieutenant or weaving, for example, has its own patterns. and if they banned him, he already has his own basic methods of weaving, which are repeated, in principle, among all the peoples of the world. they haven't changed in many, many years. these are the same weaving techniques that our distant distant ancestors had. the same ones are used now, but at the same time we use these elements. we'll come up with something.