and business, its current trends correspond to the development trends of the entire economy . the restructuring of the world is in full swing, it is not easy to withstand. how to do this with minimal costs in a complex balance of interests, the one who sees the risk and sees his goals will win. belarus appreciates those who work for the benefit of the development of the region, and not for the sake of politicians who are ready to sacrifice the progress and well-being of millions. on the mainstream. consider the global trends that affect our lives. watch on tv belarus 24 you know how to define a question that the participants will never answer, everything is very simple . i haven't been able to answer the question yet. and natasha already wrote something there. you all think so, although what i ask them. they do not come to competitions ready to give all their strength. to win the top prize rat,

i heard the mouse rat still tell. i heard a mouse. you say rat again. i accept the answer rat. this is the absolutely correct answer. yes, what the prospector does. i understand that the creative answer will be 821 days and not a day more and not a day more. watch in the intellectually entertaining tower project on our tv channel. belarusian winter all its little things. what is breathtaking?

aesthetic pleasure

this region is called little venice as you

understand, due to the weather conditions , we will not be able to start a trip in a raincoat, but this will by no means become an obstacle to our acquaintance with the city, however , hundreds, even thousands of kilometers, a unique architectural structure. one of the most famous names of the tower is belaya vezha, although in its history it is white. she never was. by the way, who didn’t know this particular tower is depicted on a five-ruble banknote, the national belarusian authenticity is home morning, where clothes and quality items were stored, the red corner of the bed and stove is approximately this is how a typical belarusian khadka looked and incredibly many positive emotions this year. travel online with

belarus 24 tv channel. book in hand larynx side by side choke with a skin word. man's creativity is the most marvelous and worthy of respect for the summer of books in books live dunks passed away, memos expressively improve people's voices.

good evening, good evening, exactly 22 years before my birthday, on may 1, 47, an appeal was published by a group of soviet scientists, cultural workers, public figures with a proposal to create an all-union

society for the dissemination of political and scientific knowledge. yep, social science. here, let's get straight, but it's not outdated. today, firstly, marat sergeevich i look at you well with mathematics, and it is the same society that distributes not only public political knowledge, but also scientifically. well, in a sense, of course, scientifically. so we invite you. why not yet among our lecturers, but in fact, yes, there were such conversations even in soviet times and social science. it was on the one hand, recognizable on the other hand. as the youth says, it has become a meme. well, remember, this figured in soviet comedies, but this does not mean that it was something so bad or wrong, on the contrary. that was very in demand. my patronymic and i found the lecturers of social science when i was very young , i remember, then they came to us and told us quite interesting things, but i'm not talking about the library of social science. imagine, he recently asked me, uh, graduate students, and how lecturers used to prepare, when there was no internet, and this is how the library of

social science was, there were these amazing brochures, where information was summarized. yes. there , in different countries on various problems, and this was really armed with arguments facts, not in vain and the newspaper. that was the name of arguments and facts, and who knows, yes, it was the official absolutely official organ of society, the knowledge itself, by the way, even went out in circulation in the millions. yes, well, you all know, this is true again, so i invite you to become our lecturer. i don't reach. people are waiting for you. eh, but at the same time, in the nineties, they wanted to abandon the knowledge society, as well as other soviet traditions, but life itself showed that it is necessary to come to people live, talk, explain, convey their point of view. see how synchronously, the processes of the revival of social science are going on both in us and in russia, you can ask, but how in other countries? uh-huh. it's just called differently. here are the traditions of educational

clubs, communities, they are very common. that's generally the structures within the individual lands. germany has a structure. similar to social studies are called educational centers there. somehow, here we often represent classic english clubs, you know, these are gentlemen sitting and smoking cigars drinking tea, uh, whiskey, i probably don’t know and then the nationalist hunts for nothing of the sort , in fact, and classic english clubs are educational structures. i'm not talking about the fact that in the european tradition, and the enlightenment there, in broad masks, they spoke about the organization of various courses. this is society. consciousness with many political parties is a very topical issue for belarus now, the development of political parties, and so, with many political parties there are appropriate educational or research funds. okay, next question then. here is knowledge in the ussr yes it is

created after all not only public leaders, yes, but even screens and heroes. yes , through the same outstanding actor balala yes , a favorite of women, yes, that is, there were sixties , but knowledge in recent years has not had bright public leaders. here, ask a question on the street. yes, they will not even name the leader of the knowledge society, either the soviet union or the belarusian republican union, and in the twentieth. i don't remember them either. here. why do you think the president entrusted you? become a media conductor of knowledge well, in society well, i think that it came together right away several factors, but first of all, yes the first part of your question. uh, they didn’t know the leader, maybe the leaders. it is not necessary to know which academician, for example, headed social studies, that academician vavilov stood at the base there, konstantin simonov, the famous poet, that is

, this initiative came from them ; have organized this work. he understands what it's like to have us want to call the speakers you want to call the lecturers classical, and the people who come to the audience charge. and what is called establishing contact. these are the people we have, we have them, and we are actively inviting them as part of the events that we hold. let's take two of ours, probably, for the last year, the largest most basic actions by which we are recognized and by which we are proud, belarus 1 and belarus 1 in the pravda regime . it appeared e. well, somewhere spontaneously. there was just a big conversation with the president, where he raised the issue of society knowledge. oh, and already in august-september on the eve

of our first day of national unity on september 17th. we decided to drive through the regions and we saw that shpakovsky dermant is avdonin. i can list more. these are the people who are recognized, trusted, listened to and expected. that is, we can say that it is right to order them in a good way. yes, we work by order in a broad sense, according to the social order and specifically of certain organizations, and in fact often they order not some kind of lecture, but this or that person. here we are waiting. let to we will come, and we will continue to continue. borovik. petrovsky a. belyaev that's what pleases me, journalists have appeared, who are waiting for a little light, a smooth tour indeed. and they know how to communicate with, uh, the audience, the audience listens to them completely or not quite agrees to argue, discusses. it is very important. look how many people like this we have . e in the deputy corps. and so

you need to work with them for them. if you like, you need to create a platform matrix to offer a model of working methods, because we are also here we even established this year or two and the form of work, be it a dialogue platform. whether it's a lecture. it is necessary to change it is necessary to change the format of reporting information. let it be a little, but nevertheless, that is, this forum was such a shot. yes, it needs to be repeated. and what form of e are you looking at. here in february , on the eve of the vote on the constitution, there was a large forum in the regime of truth in the sports palace, and on september 17. uh, there was something similar in well, dedicated to history, this is our history in minsk on september 17 - this was carried out under the auspices of the ministry of culture. we partially participated there, but we saw that people still need such formats. look here . we are now talking about speakers. they

are more or less even professionally trained, but in the same ussr there was galina ulanova yes, a ballerina a ballerina. yes, it can be called silver now. yes, they would. but i know who you see now as the headliners of the renewed society. you know, it's interesting, they mentioned the ballerino, as if you were reading our plans. although i know mine is not shared. yes, we are now working very actively with our big theatre. e with e. ekaterina dulova about the interaction and forms of presenting information using musical theatrical methods, and i really like the way we worked. i also see that people are in demand on the stage of the kupala theater, when in august of this year our kupala patriotic forum was held. and we even interact with the

national beauty school. we see, i ’ll say it straight, even, perhaps, looking ahead. here is our famous merch of the first mm everything slogans that are written, with which we go out, because behind each of these slogans there is an idea. behind each of these slogans there is a certain message, this appeal and it can be revealed, relying on it, you can convey this or that information, an idea, it can be embodied in different forms, and we are trying these forms. and in working with the audience. you have an understanding, if we remember the social science of the soviet union, we understand. there were 2,000 academicians, there were more than 200,000 doctors. yes , there were 400,000 engineers, yes, who took part in one way or another in the work social science. we understand that in order to come to the same audience of cultural workers. yes, it is desirable that a person has certain knowledge in this area and speaks the same language with them. you have such an

understanding, but if he talks about the topic of cultures, because we have cultural workers, i had to speak. eh, cultural workers, if you are talking about geopolitics or economics, you must first of all understand another issue. you correctly point out that when you communicate with people, you must understand with whom you say. and speak to them in uh, a language they can understand and understand, although i'll tell you. right now, on the eve of the seventy-fifth anniversary, we have organized such a lecture marathon on the basis of the academy of management, a series of lectures dedicated to national ideas, geopolitics of the economy, and historical continuity. and this is a very profound lecture. it's because, you know, we have sometimes. they want to follow the audience, they just want to captivate, but it is important that there is knowledge and understanding of arguments and we have organized such a series of lectures, and we see how people perceive we will be this lecture continue further. you have already mentioned that the president was an active lecturer

in social science, and in 1978 it was he who became the responsible secret of the shklov regional organization. yes, the society is now becoming the leader of the republican. social science yes, you certainly raised the archives. yes, and interested. by this very fact, of course, i am grateful to our archival workers. we looked at the materials. and by the way, we also watched newspaper publications, because social science has always been active and the activity was reflected in the media as it is now. here. you, when you said that you had not heard anything for several years, but this communication was not organized. i'm not saying who's to blame there knowledge or themselves. well, this fact is just very important to interact. by the way, when the society was created in the forty- seventh year, one of the tasks was to widely publish in the media , including, interestingly, the transcripts of the lecture. this is such a task that we can say that lecturer lukashenka was expected. uh his

information trusted the audience what we're here know were always crowded, he was preparing for a lecture. this is very important. uh worked with relevant literature. this is what we see, and at that time i am convinced that the formation of the personality of our president is of his certain style. that time of work and the responsible secretary, the electric motor wife had more time than, uh, holding a full-time position in the knowledge society. so this had a big impact on him. ok then. in 2007, by his decree, the president transformed the public association of knowledge to the republican state public association. come on, it's a status, and with your appointment in the twenty-first year. yes, in fact, he breathed new life into it. well let's talk straight. i do n’t bow before you, i say what is what i see, i’ll sincerely appreciate

clairvoyance. president, he knows what will be needed in the future, and i'm not just talking about your organization. well, you must admit, what is anti-privatization alone worth, and state-owned enterprises and pandemics, when moisture did not drive us. when he really wanted to, and here's how you explain these things for yourself. this is some kind of special knowledge. well, firstly, as regards the attention of the president to our society, i feel that the decree was not only of the seventh year, but also last year in november. they simply supported us, but also set specific tasks and they are promising, but also demanding, which we must do in the field of historical knowledge, political and scientific popularization of science. of course, we will fulfill the goals and tasks that have been set, but if we talk about the president, lukashenka, of course, this is a very big intuition. it's important, that we

don't learn. these are innate feelings. then a great worldly experience is huge. that's why the president always says you need to go from life, because there should be no artificiality, there should be desire. well , you know, you need to indulge in something rational, that’s characteristic of our belarusian nature of reasoning, and yolka i, how to be an anchor, drumming, not only for you, alleya. uh, where do you live? and this is a clear understanding that is inherent in us, it is inherent in the president, of course, this is a huge baggage of knowledge of course a and trust in specialists, because look, during the same covid, there were always specialists next to the president. in this area. these are not some

arbitrary decisions. they are based on an in- depth analysis of the information provided by specialists, and only after that one or another decision is made. on tuesday, the president held an important meeting to bring individual laws in line with the updated constitution. these are two important documents. this law on the vns was considered, and all the belarusian people assembly and law-political parties. here are the main messages you heard for yourself, not debatable, but those that are necessary for deep reflection, understanding and bringing to people. and now, you must agree, your task is precisely this when we discussed the changes to the add-on. the constitution, just the same issues relating to the entire belarusian people's assembly were among the leading ones in discussion. yes, people asked, what is it for what is it already, when we held dialogue platforms in the fall.

why do we need the entire belarusian people's assembly they did not ask if there was understanding, there is understanding, and the question arose only there, how to form it. eh, how will it be directly? yes, how will it work? here, as it seems, the main thing is not lukashenko who needs the belarusian people's assembly. it is not necessary for the presidential power, it is necessary for the country, for which, to ensure the stable development of society, to ensure continuity and as a vivid embodiment of the true principle of democracy. unfortunately, the model of democracy that we are offered, and more often imposed on the west, is manipulative model we see how it actually happens. this is the model of the oligarchy, which is a variety of cunning technologies.

he is trying to explain to the people, but to create the illusion that the people are involved in governance, we are really laying the whole belarusian people's assembly, uh, the principle of our true democracy that we associate it with our traditions. this is no coincidence. here i will not even touch the evening. take the 20th century, our belarusian experience, the all-belarusian congress of the 17th year. it was in a non-parliamentary form, but the people gathered and declared his right to live on his land and determine how we live. take the people’s assembly of western belarus in the thirty -ninth year, thanks to which we were united in one state, it had great legitimacy, and we can see this from the documents of any historian who has come across the history of the people’s gathering behind the gangway and belarus will confirm that it was a genuine people’s representation in the ninety-sixth year in full swing. we remember the islands of constitutional political

crisis. the people's assembly is all belarusian. the people's assembly played a huge role in the twentieth year in february. that is, we are already shaping our historical experience, including that of recent history, into a legislative form, that is, not something so illusory, but something that already exists, something that has already been developed and is laying a certain perspective. yes, we are pioneers here, but there is no need to be afraid of this, since we still rely on our understanding of our political system. and how to ensure the main principle that the people should be the source of power is good, but the main reproach, who throw yes to the authorities, that labor collectives. they will not be represented practically in the composition of the supreme people's forces. the president spoke very clearly about this, how you will bring it up. eh, i'll tell you that when we had discussions now. here, uh, reproach,

even far-fetched. well, that such a problem was not raised, people rather said how to take part, you just need to be able to explain it, because there the majority will be just the same representatives of the labor collective. here is a specific example. hmm , about a third is a deputy, and moreover, all levels of the village councils and the president insisted that we preserve the village council in the constitution, this is the first level, when a person encounters a representative of power or, on the contrary, takes on part of this power, becoming a deputy from the village council to the national assembly of the chamber representatives of the council of the republic and this is not representatives of labor collectives. where do our deputies come from? we have deputies only in the house of representatives, all the rest work off-duty look, these are doctors teachers businessmen. uh, these are people from this or that collective, well, let's take our main

, uh, civil society actors, who will send trade union representatives to their representatives. well, a trade union is the flesh of the flesh of labor collectives. this is basically the work of the belarusian republican youth union. and where we have young people in the audience and in labor collectives, they will also be avoided, the same applies to the veterans of white russia of the women's union, these are the representatives of these collectives. and why have the question arises, when is a public association at all. if not they put forward with us the same director of the enterprise has quite a lot of worries about the economy and the provision of jobs for the sale of products. i can list further. we are still the management and, uh, the team has a task than the organization. here is the election. and why are there trade unions in this collective then, and why did they nominate their deputy from this collective either by collecting signatures or directly from the collective. this is their voice, their voice will be represented in all belarusian folk

meeting, so here is the logic. it seems obvious to me. it seems to me that one more point should be emphasized, president. e drew attention to it well, delegates. it is not just that all the belarusian people's assembly should participate. they must then come to their labor collectives and report back. that is, they must then work with them. that may be what we lacked before the constitutional referendum, and before this law we had e we were delegates. well, we have worked out all the belarusian people's gathered. let's let's be honest, let's go. here i took part once and still no. now you are for the entire duration of the entire belarusian people's assembly. what makes it easier, first of all, to be responsible to those who nominated you? it's not just you being present.

well, take it any, but oh well, there is an american system, it is special. well, take the french parties, but where are those classical socialists, galist communists, new movements are now being created. uh, very

fast dynamics of political life, everything changes, and we are often offered. not here let's get back. here we will create something to that scheme of the fifties. we must, firstly, look at the trends, and secondly, proceed from our own interests , the party should not divide society. it should represent the interests of a significant part of society, not necessarily all, but not to divide the party should not demand the overthrow of the constitutional order. it can and should criticize the government if it is not the government itself, but the party cannot be financed from abroad without leading to a civil split being the tool of an individual oligarch or hierarchical groups, it cannot be bought by some big businessman. these are the key requirements, but the party must also have some kind of ideology. a party cannot be created just to

take part in this or that electoral campaign. and this is a very serious demand that the party must represent the whole of society. er, well, not necessarily. that's right, all citizens. but if this is a party, it should be in minsk, and it should be in vitebsk in all regions, except for the regional level. we also have districts, but if not in all, well, at least in the third there should be structures, when a person comes out, he says, i am a representative of one party or another. we must understand. yes , there are at least 10 behind him, they have 20-30 thousand members of the party. this is the program we understand with whom we are dealing, and if the party was created in order to cut grants or satisfy someone's ambitions, why does the belarusian society need such a party and most importantly, god forbid, if this arises, it's in perspective way to manipulate our political system is usually from abroad. here are the clear

barriers. you think that we have already got rid of random parties. here's a new look, not yet, not yet, not yet. uh, let's wait for the adoption of the law, then, as i understand it, the procedure for re-registration of parties should go through, probably some parties will leave. even obviously there will be new parties. uh, i don't know. can we talk about, uh, concrete examples here? well, i would still say, look how they showed themselves. the communist party works according to the norms, a many have tried to impose such an image. eh, this party is from the past. yes, this is it. where does it come from, only the old people, well, if the old people, well, look how many young sheets of bright recognizable liberal-democratic parties have appeared. how it works, yes, yes, there are ambitions about white russia. well, let's see how the situation will develop. i see that there is. eh, some ideological ones. well, no matter how associations, but niches based on our

constitutional system, which is not yet represented at the party level, it means that they may have appeared. i like your thoughts which was said. that's when we started discussing this block. eh, after all, it’s really not the vns, nor the party, the president does n’t really need them, they are personal. yes, he does not need them as portraits. indeed, in fact, the president has always communicated directly with the people, and this was his main distinguishing feature. here, in essence. we are talking about the fact that they should become the same parties, uniting them with such a uniting principle for protection against external threats, as if observing the main principle, everything is in the interests of their state. here, if we we will clearly understand this and convey this moment, probably, well, it seems to me, then the understanding will be correct. let's just say alexander lukashenko, he is the creator. here is that independent sovereign belarus as we know it. i think it's hard for anyone to argue with that. and now he understands. time is changing, and belarus is changing, and he wants to define, uh,

that political model, including the social model of our development, which will remain for many years to come, and we are interested in this. here is the interest president coincides with the public interest. uh-huh i got such an idea pushed. here, look, we have been talking for several years in a row, including as part of the work of lecturers, or speakers. eh, we already had a lecturer. i remember in truth mode well? yes, people reacted well, thanks to the people sitting here, among other things, it was such a collective work in fact. look, we have been talking about the manual for several years. sharpe yes, and 50 years will already be as follows does not work. look, well, yes, and essentially 2020. yes he made of us professionals those who are already beginning to really understand what happened, how it happened and that we are not really

unique in all this, but we turned out to be the only ones who turned out to be too tough for the smell, because i am very as he says, the shower warms a little , perhaps, we already in the knowledge society into our own methodological manual, and not anti-sharpa, yes, but lukashenka's manual has such a request, and m-m it is obvious to do this. i will share with you just an observation in your twentieth year. well, in general we e we spoke today in the belarusian character. there is such a character, we do not like to brag or show our own there, on the contrary, we hide something somewhere. well, you know that there, uh, and the neighbors did not envy, and so, well, just in case, so as not to jinx it. well , sometimes belarusians are not often treated like that, uh, and i noticed that a lot of colleagues in russia and even in foreign countries want to study this experience, but they do it so carefully. inviting to some

events or coming here and not right away, but gradually speaks. and how did it happen for you, what did you do, and why did they do it this way, and indeed, not only opponents, but also allies or potential allies are looking at us very seriously. this belarusian experience is very valuable. i think that we are already in lectures somewhere, talking at international conferences. e, including with statesmen of foreign countries outlined this experience. eh, well, it's probably time to generalize it and propose it in the form of some kind of possible one. i won’t just do scientific work just sprinkle with silly. i have to emphasize one point all the time writing until now this information is hanging free encyclopedia. yes, like wikipedia that, in order to cope with that information war, the information struggle in the twentieth, flew here. yes, a few. hello

, who provided this information victory, and in fact, when we understand that we did it ourselves. uh, this is well worth the availability of information. yes, i want to ask, you were the dean of the faculty, you know, how to communicate with youth. here are our enemies. they didn't calm down. they very much count on the younger generation, which will have the right to vote in the electoral company. yes, and the right to choose. they need such new blood to replace the one that either figured out the situation or sat down, as they say, yes. here, are you going to use a fashionable internet platform and talks in the same tik about the same genocide, continuing the previous question, in order to be successful, do not try to be fashionable, but because there will only be external form no result and no need to work according to the training manual. and there must be inspiration and there must

be. here, uh, you know this understanding, as the military, they say you want to win, knowing the charter, but you didn’t let go of the war. here you must understand the algorithm of actions, what you must do, but if you speak only according to the charter, nothing will work. if you don’t know, the joint won’t work either, so we need to understand. this basis should be knowledge and a sense of the situation. well, we see how our president works. what about youth for 2 years. let me tell you, quite a lot has been honestly done, and we even see how the enemy reacts to this, uh, i won’t just tell my society knowledge. we work very closely with the ministry of education. look, the anthem is being sung in schools , and very serious systematic work is underway on historical education on patriotic education, a new discipline with a pink block.

our union, the youth, is working brightly enough. we are already seeing the results i have talked to our military. and they emphasize that even the call has begun to change. these are the guys who join the army, now the armed forces are generally more widespread. and this is good. i would even say e well, not all problems. of course, we have decided here in the youth sphere. i don’t want this in any way, but you can’t help but see the trends that are positive for the more problematic age from 30 to 45. these are, say, former or young people who left not so long ago because of that age, and whom where - something we missed in those years when it may be underestimated the significance of ideology, a little embarrassed to talk about patriotism, at least as we do it now questions of the historical education of culture. let's put it straight, and then our mediaological opponents. there was simply dominance, well, you must admit the ninety-

first to 2003, almost a word of ideology. let's say. here we are now, uh, we know our relationship to bullish symbolism, right? the twentieth year, the beginning of the nineteenth, i can’t even say in the city center a store next to the academy of the ministry of internal affairs on masherov avenue, where everything is free is on sale and not only there at the airport you take off. that's where it all is. it is sold virtually freely. here's what happened recently. and so, the generation that was formed in that period was young and young. it is even necessary to work with them, maybe more in-depth than although with all categories, of course. uh, you need to work, but we can see from sociology that this is at least another one, okay then. if not new, then working form. yes, not informing the attitude towards them is different. well one of the biggest critics in front of you is how we do it do. well, here you will agree largely

depends on the specific speakers correctly, who are traveling correctly to a specific team. maybe i'll give you a little first. firewood into this fire, and then you will kindle it. yes, i am gasoline, i will tell you my impression, when i come to the team to perform , it is very important for me that the team is not selected in such a way that it is absolutely smooth. i want to have tough questions. and sometimes it still seems to me that these people are simply afraid to be introduced into this team and such there is such, of course, well. why? you are the most critical of me and i consider myself to be such, because i had to go through all the stages. eh, this form of work. e has been introduced in our country since 2003, when the system policy actually began. here is march 2003, the beginning of the state ideological policy was a big seminar the president signed, then decrees and off

i was a teacher who was involved in this work. i was one of the leaders of the youth union, who also came at the information day. you said it right dean and in the union of journalists. we were engaged in this, worked in the media , that is, i can see how it is organized, often there is a lot of formalism. that's what we write for. we talked about training manuals, because every day of informing they write an appropriate brochure, relying on which, creatively, processing this information, it is necessary to convey the point of view that we sometimes get it. they just take and read out the hearing of the team, what we want to achieve. so it's better, in general, such a day is not informing to conduct than to conduct a question our speakers, recognizable hyped in the media, of course, will not arrive exactly on the day of information for each team. although, believe me, there are a lot of bright people in the region. this year we held belarus 1. what wonderful historians do we have in the regions? well, i’m amazing,

in fact, that is, these people are local, maybe they are not so recognizable at the national level, by the way, that’s television, we need to raise them and invite them here to minsk from mogilev vitebsk to grodny by means yes, there must be. these people we see them now, by the way, during our actions. we saw them, yes, it is your societies, in my opinion. can give us the text of the speakers who lacked today ready to do it and will do it. these are not empty words. so continuing the day of informing. everywhere will not reach, but the question. and why do we then need the same deputy directors for ideological work and how we appoint them to a person who simply reads this manual aloud. he probably shouldn't be in this position. right they say that an ideologist is a piece of goods. well , the word is such a commodity, but this person must be unique, i understand, you won’t find such people everywhere , so we need to think here how to convey, maybe, uh, and it’s bad, uh, with these

events. let's do it in one day . there are three and a half thousand meaning. let's hold some basic seminars. and then these people that will come will disperse and will tell. we have become so. uh, here in minsk to introduce seminars for ideological workers on the basis of the academy shed where we invite bright interesting speakers. why do we forget about online in the form, when we have a person who understands this problem through online can cover? docks krug e our teams we offer it. you see, here's even one beautiful tad-presentation, as you had in the truth mode. here you come with this one, you don't need to collect everyone. well, one person speaker will come to the district on the topic of information day and believe me, the whole district will know, there is no need to gather everyone there, there are 150 enterprises of people, the whole district will know, but here it is important to live the second part, so that officials , representatives of state authorities

actually traveled. these are two lines. this speaker is an expert who understands a particular problem and representatives of state authorities, for whom the day of information is a way to communicate, learn about the problems of the team, and respond to people's requests. it does not always work out, yet, but we should think about improving this work. and in principle, if you like, our state ideological policy. that's in the broadest sense of the word. this is the informative and legal basis of the form method of work organizational staffing . we need to restart, first of all, with those uh normative acts that were adopted back in the third and fourth year. wow, how much time has passed the twentieth year has taught us a lot now on life teaches, and therefore, it seems to me, the time has come. uh, not only such a serious big conversation, but also decisions. e in this part. in june, we had a seminar led by the president on work. here is this explanatory very sound thought. the

president also spoke at this seminar there. e noted and direction of work and made remarks and criticized. well, now you think, six months have passed. it seems to me, especially a year before the electoral campaign of our single day. which will be in 24, just the time has come for such a systematization of all this work and our achievements and shortcomings. a and. that's what we said restart, if you like, maybe a provocative question. now yes, and i don’t wait with others. and what is knowledge, significantly 2/3 of all lectures were paid. yes, this is the system assumed in your knowledge society. yes, and they are now paid lectures. i understand such a question always as well, here, let's just have an ideology . well let's just say it straight. no, somewhere, maybe, and uh, the load, of course, as a public one. i'll tell you straight. we have all

the speeches within the framework, and the campaigns to explain the constitution were all free of charge , it was all, well, a civil appeal, a patriotic appeal, all people work like that, but at the same time. well, let's take our expert. well, let's say it's up to the price. well , firstly, he needs to break away from his main activity, often, this is a trip somewhere outside the same minsk if he himself is from minsk yes, and on the territory in minsk he needs to prepare very seriously for this, this is both emotional and intellectual costs, they must be compensated. well, why not? even more so, uh, our enterprises have allocated funds for this, because if an enterprise orders, as we said, one color or another. well, his expenses for this work should be compensated from my point of view. this is correct. here's how to organize this work, but again on a new level. we are now

we are already discussing such agreements, and many of our trade union organizations and enterprises conclude them directly. eh, but we see that it still needs to be generalized in some way, again put on a new basis. the speakers here, perhaps in this situation, many themselves want to. listen, this was such a case. we are on the talk show of vladimir rudolfovich. solovyov once mentioned this possibility, when everyone says, we will come. i think that our audience is waiting here, by the way, and the surprises that we have identified, the phone is cut off, they say, when sad and hurtful. ugh, here it is. here i say in belarus here we are, sometimes we appreciate someone else's. uh, well, the russians are not completely foreign to us, but there in moscow or somewhere else. well, let's say. this is the same as with a musical performer will be here to sing to perform. you know this very well, as soon as fr. o. you see, you will play in our theater, well, the circle of theater-goers will know, as soon as somewhere not even in

the series in moscow at the theater. as it is customary to say there, it will appear, it says, well, you see, here we took the documents on our own, we feel as soon as you speak more often on moscow talk shows, as if of course, let's talk about it directly, but at the same time i want to say that the level of our experts in the vast majority of problems is very high. here. the main thing on the same russian talk shows. you were the dean of the faculty of philosophy of the philosophy of the social sciences, philosophy, sociology, psychology, social communications, social work, the key word is philosophy, it is for everyone, as it were, understandable, and does not say anything, but still yes, and the last ones are about a philosophical question. despite the fact that i would like to talk for a long time, but today the fight against russia has become a trend, right? not we, of course, once the trend was the minsk agreements and the end of the war.

yes, in the donbass, for the sake of new trends in the fight against russia, wars with russia changed their shoes. even very strong politicians, as we thought. well , like the mercury of france, another attempt to repaint was ugly. sorry for such a very precise word many western politicians. they can no longer stand, in the same row we will not be sdagol, no chipping, no stitcher or shredder. i'm not saying that they can't stand on a par with ours. this is what must happen today in order for new european leaders to appear who, first of all, will think about their country, their people, and national interests. here's how to make it an international trend? this is definitely its a special military operation. it became a test for everyone , for russia, for us, for the west, and for the processes

that were latent. they came out what we're seeing is russia's cancellation culture belarus is fascism. this is fascism, this is xenophobia, which they are trying to justify with some pseudo-democratic slogans, the fascisization of europe, we see it and we can prove it, fascisation is not necessary, the fascist party and the national socialist or there is no mussolini announcer. read mri eco read other european thinkers. how did they describe it? and how does it happen? unfortunately, we see this happening. yes , the leaders were crushed, but i am not a supporter of these conversations that all this is the end of europe, i am convinced that new ones will appear. well, others, you see, when they copy as they tried, there is johnson somewhere to copy churchill well and jones the population track.