implementation of integration programs of the union state the theme of the meeting in the palace of independence is in the focus of the president interim results of work and problematic aspects in the integration package signed more than a year ago, 28 sectoral programs their implementation is a significant step towards

ensuring equal rights for citizens and enterprises of the two countries seven of these, in general, the package of documents provides for, about a thousand integration measures, about 70% have been completed, but some are behind schedule president draws attention to the gaps in the work to address many issues of cooperation. belarus russia agreed to take a comprehensive approach, it is impossible to delay, especially now that the countries are together resisting pressure from the collective west, we will continue to strengthen integration. from russia well, firstly , it will be possible to talk about a new package of programs only after the previous one has been fully implemented, and secondly, we are talking about the work of the economy. they once again focused attention on the loss of our sovereignty. the president continues to work on the implementation 21 union programs. in the areas of agriculture, transport, industry and energy, one of the important areas is the harmonization of tax legislation, as well as the coordination of tax and customs

control on the borders of the union state. grodno azot plans to implement four major projects by 2026. the work plan was updated and supplemented, taking into account external negative factors of market conditions and logistics of product deliveries, in order to minimize costs, we intend to reconstruct the existing production and introduce two new ones. workshops. in general, under the conditions of sanctions pressure, enterprises are successfully working out new approaches to import substitution and supplying the necessary raw materials as well. a mandatory effort is aimed at diversifying export sales, taking into account the closure of traditional sales markets this year in belarus, it is planned to allocate 45% of the budget from the budget to the social sphere, according to the ministry of finance, which is slightly more than 27 billion rubles. moreover, the amount increased by almost 18% compared to the previous one. the growth of real incomes of the population is set at the level of four percent. priority will be funding education and health care, a significant

part will be the cost of wages and pensions. more allowances than last year were allocated to subsidize housing and communal services. trade entities will continue to support the population provide a discount of up to 10% the ministry of antimonopoly regulation and trade agreed with large networks to extend the agreements that were accepted. last year. the discount is provided to disabled pensioners, large families and low-income families. layers of the population and covers 29 product groups, the agreement was signed last january. over the year, 1.5 million social cards have already been issued in the amount of 21.5 million rubles. an exhibition of memory, the first honorary patriarchal exarch, has opened in minsk. all belarus metropolitan philaret. he passed away 2 years ago on january 12 at the age of 85, but the fruits of his good deeds, we observe to this day, vladyka can rightfully be called a historical

figure in the modern history of belarus of its spiritual revival. after all, it was he who opened the temple after the temple gave a new life returned church relics to monasteries and started the process. the canonization of belarusian saints at the exhibition presents paintings and the results of the sixth plein air. the sacredness of the belarusian land. in the exposition, you can also see the personal belongings of vladyka, for example, the edition of the new testament, which he always brought to his lectures . all this is the work of one composer. john williams his creative biography five oscars six emmys seven, british awards academy, but performs musical masterpieces, streaming a video sequence, the symphony orchestra of the bolshoi theater of belarus conducted by maestro wilgel kait from germany the bolshoi

theater offered me to make this program, it is very effective and the audience likes it, so we are pleased to offer the magical music of hollywood to belarusian listeners ahead of new projects with big musicians in march. flying dutchman, and in the summer festival of the ufpr in nesvizh with a hollywood program, the large orchestra has already performed in europe now at the patriotic the stage in the program also involved two choirs at once. honestly a political talk show basically on

new year's eve we come with changed taxes, how much will it affect our lives. if you would like to join our conversation. here you can see the qr code. point the camera of your mobile phone and join the conversation in court kirill kazakov and my colleague will work with you. hello alina well , did the belarusians live, did they not grieve? so from time to time they complained that something was wrong, then it’s not this, but here on new year’s eve new e taxes, yes, and on some items as a percentage. there are only two or three times, but they grow. actually, it turned out that all this time, it seemed, not everything was so bad . if we compare, then what are we going to deal with now. here we have the head of the taxpayers association in our studio, and lyubov petrovna, here is a question for you right away. we even asked each other so. so far, everyone was

preparing for the program about what, well, in fact. here is every belarusian who is involved correctly, but we are not in your association, so let's for our let's explain to viewers. hey, who are you in charge of? taxpayers association is already the seventh year in the main. uh, well, of course, taxpayers, yes, they are big companies. why did we decide to assemble it, create it? it is a small association, but representatives, i don’t know, you can call it there is no legal entity, uh, with a large one with different types of activities - this is both a retail trade and some kind of production and a state-owned enterprise. these are large enterprises, large taxpayers. uh, we have a little bit of ip, well, mostly it's large and purposeful, of course it was. why did we create an association? this is probably work with the tax code.

these are practically the problems that arise with calculated taxes, not even with calculated taxes, because a understands the payment of taxes. it is the duty of any conscientious taxpayer, but the administration of taxes from the outside. in the ministry of taxes and collections - this is one topic and another topic is to correctly calculate , correctly understand the legislation, therefore , from this point of view, we organized ourselves. and now for the seventh year we practically work, for example, the changes have affected, probably, you are called such large ones . well, i don’t know photographers, people who do manicures there, who run an agricultural estate, these people are also your agros - your associations are or are not necessary. it's like they figure it out on their own. mostly.

we probably have them as clients of our accounting companies and independently with taxes, but it is difficult to understand for this you need specialists, so we have, for example, accounting companies, several members of the association, but very different ones. customers, including agribusiness, and uh, in an agricultural enterprise. hmm, also with different types this year, just from the fact that well, my circle, as people with whom i communicate, is, first of all, people who are engaged in holding holidays i will not hide. yes, it's the ventos-industry people who provide some kind of equipment on holidays. for them it really was such. well, let's just say it's not a serious question. yes, but a question that they've been working on for months. and still. they're trying to figure it out. here is your opinion of what has happened to us since january 1st. this is an ordinary event. that is, well, relatively speaking, such a mathematical story, the numbers have changed,

or else. indeed, this is something global strategic, as a specialist who works with tax and code more or less, knowing i can’t. of course, i can’t speak there. well, as narrow experts know, but i don't think it's global problem. we are with our clients, let's say with ip small clients, we told them back in december, but we showed all the changes worked out with each issue. what type of taxation? right here and in principle, well, there was no such stress. each of them took, there someone for income, someone for income the fact is that this topic did not fall yesterday today this topic of a terrible year taxes to rise. we started smoothly from last year, so there was no surprise here. and about the fact that the changes are global or not. these are ordinary changes go towards the decision that someone was not aware, someone did not know, i forgot

to pay them. e taxes. here's what the nfernost can tell us, how things are going belarusians have remained over time more disciplined in the context of paying taxes, or or are still trying. well, i can speak for my department, which i represent. yes, the department of financial investigations. simple statistics for the last 10 years the number of crimes under article 243 of the criminal code of this paint is tax evasion. uh, twice decreased reveal well, in general, the trend of economic crime is on the decline. yes to decline. why, in principle, i can say about two main reasons to name the first is, of course, the liberalization of legislation. ah, many, shall we say, acts that were previously criminally punishable. they have become not punishable, plus, of course, i think, let's say, raising the legal awareness of taxpayers, because

he thinks business in terms of profit. yes, if, uh, the consequences of these offenses of crimes for business, they very painful in terms of money. yes, a lot of money will have to give something, and it's easier for them. well, apparently alexander’s calculation could be these figures that were in effect before yes, they were for paying taxes, well, just the same, they were those that can be painlessly given and paid, there was no need for an individual entrepreneur to pay a professional tax from the point of view of creating a company. uh, any any organization is trying to minimize. e taxes to be paid. well, who wants to give money? it seems, it seems, nowhere yes, of course, uh, and there is such dispute, what does it mean, there is tax minimization, and there is tax evasion. yes

, tax optimization, whatever. it is called here, you need to look at the very essence. yes. what the businessman wanted. here are some manipulations in the end, yes, that is, he wanted to put more money into his pocket or he wanted to develop his business, and therefore he optimized taxes. well, it can be said that i wanted to put absolutely norms. well, well , well, seriously. think it will be individual for you, what else? well , of course, of course in business due to the fact that will increase increased tax on some points. yes, you expect growth. rather rather, i would not make such forecasts, based on the fact that the trend has been going on for the last 10 years. yes, a decrease in economic crime e talk about that e due to changes in tax laws this year. it will rise sharply. well, no, but the trend will go down. and for example, uh, there, on the splash screen, it was indicated that the simplified system is being canceled, please,

we still have a taxation system. well actually in fact, this is probably not quite true, but this is for individual entrepreneurs, yes, and individual entrepreneurs and will not be single tax payers under the simplified system before. indeed, this was a problem, because here is the application of a simplified taxation system. it was in many schemes that the so-called business splitting scheme was present. or the same salaries in envelopes, that is, the optimization of wage taxes, when workers were taken out, and instead of labor relations, civil law contracts were concluded with them. and this is much. well reduced in order. general budget payments. yes hmm if you compare, they would pay him a salary and all salary taxes, or how an individual entrepreneur works. he pays him. here. uh, accordingly, now the simplified taxation system for individual entrepreneurs is cancelled. here i looked at the statistics according to

my information. for 9 months and 22 years, 63% of payers have been simplified in terms of simplified taxation. this is the ip now they will not be. well, and accordingly, this is simple mathematics, yes, the theory of probability and others risk almost everything that is called people igor viktorovich here. a. well, often our opponents are included. well, in principle, there is such an opinion that when the state suddenly decides to raise taxes, it means there is no money, it is necessary to rob the population and thus solve their problems. it's just that this issue suddenly began to be sharply politicized. here is the phrase. yes the steeper the sanctions against belarus, the higher the financial authorities raise taxes for business. all this will lead to a significant reduction in the taxation of the adored base. and shrinking incomes and job losses. you see, these this question. pulled out right there. i understand

perfectly well that we have enemies of that and it is they who use this topic, but still, well, let's probably outline a little and tell why these changes, which we will talk about today, they occurred first of all in first turn. this is perfection. further improvement of the taxation procedure. and this second one is the exclusion of the plurality of taxation regimes, and you absolutely correctly noticed that we have this way, which means that i want to go there, here and so on, and that similar and the third is important. this is an exception to unfair tax competition. this moment, this is the aspect in this context of our today's conversation and in the context of the question why, but explain yes tax competition, and tax competition, it just lies in the fact that when carrying out the same types of activities, either periodization. well, this is a group of goods. we pay different taxes, different amounts of taxes, and

hence, respectively, different levels of tax burden, and hence, respectively various levels of profitability. as for the ability to manipulate two examples , look, well, getting ready for the program, i just started making phone calls to talk to people there. here's the girl's wife going for a manicure. she says what i do with every manicure. it is now more convenient for me to pay tax on each of my procedures than a single one, because i can do more there or do less, but i clearly know that i pay tax on each of my work absolutely, second. we are familiar, which i'm talking about from the event area. yes he is now a lot of corporate parties february march - it will be like a month when, well, they are not. just well, peace of mind, while he pays the same tax. he says, now i am crying and i understand what i am paying for, then i am unemployed, but i will still pay the same money. you raise the question in this story, who is it easier and more profitable to be an ipshnik or

self-employed. but cyril also partially answers your own question. well, firstly, as for the event sphere, that is, what i already heard at the beginning of our conversation, that is, the self-employed is about to become a tax payer for professional income, when we open the list of activities approved by decree 851, and there this type of activity. no, that is, if you want to send this activity away, you have the right to consider it, then only from the payment of a single one, as self-employed citizens are another moment. you can be a payer and an individual entrepreneur. that is, it is also possible here, again, it is absolutely reasonable to pay income tax in this situation. yes, that is, what we are talking about, and what we are pushing our entrepreneurial environment. that is earnings. you pay this income. and if it depends on time, then you are better, as it were, absolutely. well, there is also an opportunity to choose, but is it true that all individual entrepreneurs will now be forced to pay tax, like an ordinary

enterprise, and andrey valerievich maybe here, explain how entrepreneurs reacted to these innovations and how fair this is, in principle, because it turns out however, as you said, when selling the same group of goods, and state-owned enterprises, for example, paid one tax, and ip paid another. well, naturally. they somewhere goods could be cheaper and competition. here was clearly unfair expressed about what is predictable. uh, the increase in taxes every year, half a year and the participation of the business community in such projects about uh, increases, including this, leaves much to be desired now i will explain. here you are asking. is it true that all individual entrepreneurs will now be forced to pay tax, but we have a colleague here who explains that not only with them, but also in the practice of law enforcement. from evasion either that's how colleague spoke. yes, it really has shrunk. uh, misdemeanor crime

on economic crimes. this fact is statistics, but individual entrepreneurs are micro-small medium-sized businesses. they are not involved in the business environment. and today. note. we are already on the ninth day, and they are asking a question. is it true that he will force everyone now, and how can you open an individual entrepreneur in minsk, so this is a question of the second day, because today they are asking a question. how can i pay, that is, the colleague who asks the question, he is not competent, he does not know what today, a tax on professional activities has been introduced for self-employed individuals, an individual entrepreneur can switch to the general taxation system and pay a single tax, that is, a microorganization, which is what our state calls for. uh, the president instructs. the main thing is that it should be a simple system, so if we are talking about the fact that our representatives of government agencies present the project to the president, on september 9 , the structure of tax changes and in part. the draft law on entrepreneurship, which is sent to revision in order to simplify it,

so that there are no such questions. and we, passing through every council for the development of entrepreneurship, the public advisory council and we are the structure of the infrastructure for supporting entrepreneurship, associations, technology parks, incubators, business support centers, we are talking almost every day join the ranks. join the ranks of posting e, means free of charge, e, all the consultations that we can carry out on a free basis were posted by the executive committees and in the df. and everywhere. let's sign the agreement. let's get more from the mtc agreement, where else and how can be placed so that the class of individual entrepreneurs is the class of microorganization , finally realized that the projected increase. we are not trying to radically reduce them. today we must say that there are insy. here, well, for example, our index of business optimism, which will allow in six months. we need to reduce them. we need to stimulate them. we need to increase them, so today we are talking about what is right

but the amplifiers raise one question what do we do? i am an ip. i paid one single tax. i was minding my own business. why should i join an association? why do i need to know about some index? why should i know about anything at all if he writes that we were forced to buy cash registers, and then they began to work past the cash register not to interrupt goods, and now they were considering the purchase of cash registers already in society a year and a half ago in january. once again i say, sitting in a person, he has a question. what should i do? here are 9 days new year's has passed. he experienced a little new year's holiday began on monday of the new week. and suddenly they say to him sharply. here, well here, here now here so and here where? here i was dusting. i am an ip. what should i do? wait. i will finish, if you will, i am an advocate, that is, uh, we are an association

that advocates for individual entrepreneurs. but when you offer the same protection to an individual entrepreneur at no cost, now nine days have passed, and i am 100% sure that this individual entrepreneur is from the market, or the trading house ring, or the expo was, where we will also hold and held more than one meeting of the meeting, that is, the individual entrepreneur repeatedly even on all information signs. they want they don't want anything they're all right. so if you don't want to do anything. why, then , to carry out a type of entrepreneurial activity, the state has developed a different procedure for its activities on the same conditions as it used to be, yurgiy, vasilyevich let's explain. why is it impossible or possible in the way it was before? let's go back a little to the initial questions, firstly, with kirill, you are now defending a conscientious entrepreneur. no, i'm asking a question. you are correct, wait you are correct for

that. i do not oppose the people in me. i've been paying tax as an individual entrepreneur and now i'm being forced. what are the claims against me from this point of view , really, but let's get back to the statistics of a slightly higher level. i still it initiates the state of everything. at least, i had all the data at the beginning of these last year 370.000. ip, that is, they there is talk, they fell under this press of the state and with 370.000 ip 160.000. that is, a third, in fact, they paid themselves no less than the subsistence minimum of 72,000. what is the question from this question? so it doesn't happen either. it means that he considers the business in order to earn them from the interests, which means that in fact a very large layer spoke about this, imagine def. this is used as a laundering tool a tool of care from one to just those people who are not on education, so the state went on creating a level playing field, that is, in fact

, by this decision. they solve two problems. the first task is the creation of competitive single competitors, and the second is the reduction of some shadow schemes, so from this it is necessary to consider this issue from this point of view. here a colleague correctly says the same thing about participation in a business union, but i also have a question calling for him to join a business union in an association, 1/2. the third is that he will give an educational program. so by and large. today, anyone can use their phone smart phone find this information learn. it 's not a problem. to do this, you do not need to enter into business, business, the association should start some other function, in particular. if we are now talking about the shadow business, then, in principle, our business is literally everything, they generally occupied. there is no dacha position in the west, where business is a participant and a guarantor of the integrity of the implementation of the enterprises of

its members by and large, and we have such a contender if it is a belarusian brand, but it is an automobile association of carriers. she takes responsibility for the bam, so the question is who is to blame? what to do? for me personally me personally. what is the state of understanding and the logical process doing now. we are just now reaping this liberalization and this class of individual entrepreneurs has been left without consultation at all. wait they had they had to overcook to stay. it's closed now because it's been carried away, please. yes there is a lot of association for advising advising. no need to be no need. igorevich yes, thank you, well, first of all, i would like to immediately clarify about some figures 270.000. we have registered individual entrepreneurs, of which about 190,000 operate.

it's the same numbers year after year. they may vary somewhat, but for 9 months in the current past year, i beg your pardon, the average salary of hired persons is 380 rubles. here we are again, so small. this is just a form of speech of specific figures, that is, it is clear we are prophylactic. now we are not working on control, we are prophylactic, that is, we are clarifying this category. and why because such an association is still small for helping individual entrepreneurs, i don't mind. this is all, of course, without condition, we do not restrict anyone, but there is nothing more gratuitous than the opportunity to visit the tax authority. we have a service center in every inspection, the cut is absolutely free of charge, listen here. you'll get. yes? see all these questions. for example, we can pass it on to you so that, well, if suddenly you consider it necessary to answer, look, in fact, here are the questions. i say people watch tv, if you start a mini-enterprise, do it with your own hands for a start, what kind of tax should you choose simplified, if you open a

mini-enterprise, this is why the navalny body advises an entrepreneur, which system do you choose? what is entrepreneurship is reading from activities at your own risk and at your own risk for your resources. and now you wait for the tax, and then tell me, the tax office told me so, look. well we let's engage everyone must serve. i understand that if we are talking about having to a on one side somehow . just talk about tax competition. yes, in order to bring people into an equal and reasonable rule. yes, the second story is really to explain to people, because in fact, tax officials should not know the simple basics of legislation. unfortunately, this is where the problems come from. they are their cottages. and

he takes part in the development of a constructive dialogue of business and does not ask such questions, because there is a lot of. yes, we have a certain competence. we have in companies organized and tax consultants and people who study tax law from all sides. our main goal is not to make mistakes, because you can't pay me to minimize and not make mistakes. because when you make a mistake like this girl of accountants costs the company very much, this is not a mistake. judge he's the tax dpr. here we are now talking about something that i don’t even want to add. we have a very developed market of accounting companies no problem and pomp to consult to conclude an agreement and some minimum money there to invent it yourself as accounting, but to get a normal consultation, as

more than one business does it all over the world. in neighboring countries , he will not go without an agreement with professionals, because he does not know the most peshnik to anyone. no, is he getting ready or what? well, tell me, so the financial literacy of our citizens should work with them. but i understand that the people who graduate from your university are, well, they must be some kind of race. here is the very basics. they should know at least yes, yes, at least know the basics, well, of course, we are developing and financial and tax literacy and tax literacy. e are not only the tax authorities. well, including our graduates, we train both for business and for the tax authorities, so people who graduate from our university. we have, uh, specific specialization taxes , taxation, but in general, everywhere, in principle, u package. fundamentals of taxation and financial markets of entrepreneurship it

is considered throughout the university, so we generally make the university three points of view of theorists. here it is a change that has taken place, but perhaps practice what it's like to jump out. well, they commented on what happened with us , there is simply no frozen dog , life changes, changes, business processes change. uh, the tax structure is changing conditions. that's why not a year ago, not a year later. why now, a, because life is very mobile now. look, no one asked for some reason. eh, questions. how will the tax on professional income be used? colleagues, they are here and as a matter of fact, professional income tax allows a person who is not tax literate enough to simply download this application and more. it does almost nothing except that everything else is yes,

except that it must reflect its operations. the tv will do everything else for him, which is professional accounting, if i can download everything and use it exclusively. this is the right to choose. can you go? why is bookkeeping professional bookkeeping mainly for big business, yes, basically business is a medium business, including what we are talking about self-employment and taxes on professional tax yes, girls who do manicures. here she pays from each session some amount of money for a girl who does a manicure. she ends the application because of her already our faces, which we have released to the tax authorities. they are considered girls. it will not be necessary to do anything, moreover, the girl will not have to think for him about what will happen to her at retirement age. hello, because including professional income tax in these 10% which

are included they will be calculated. yes, the amount goes to the fss goes to the fsz, and the girl, when the nails are over, roughly speaking, before retirement and will receive their pension day. she will. as a matter of fact, to receive, so this is a big plus, and i will say, probably, colleagues will confirm that, uh, we are quite actively promoting our tax system now all over the world, and our neighbors in the cis countries, the eu countries are promoting such applications for small business. e in the russian federation we have six tax regimes. and there is generally an automated tax regime that allows it. true, it was introduced as an experiment in certain industries and in certain regions, but it allows. as a matter of fact, to automate to automate all processes to simplify the system is now a natural question. when we say that the rate has risen and we will have to pay more. a person will not have to pay the social security fund, he will not need to consult professional

accountants, and he is thus. actually speaking, reduces his costs he will not have to go to the tax authority. it will only tag its mobile app, so, well, that doesn't mean you can't pay. he pays. you have to pay only through a single tax. this is our sacred duty regarding the service. moreover, he clearly understands that if he is incorrectly calculated the tax payment. he is not responsible for this. the person who developed this mobile application is responsible for this. yes, it could be, uh, perfect. i would like to add. why today let's just say that today is an unusual situation. and we see what is happening on the southern border, and we see what he said today. here yesterday or the day before yesterday , the ministry of finance, 45% of payments. this is income. this goes to a social project, that is, there will be no taxable base. this means that we are flying some important social projects. therefore, from this point of view and moreover, it

does not mean, i repeat the cost, that all of a sudden today they woke up and started talking about the budget, there is not enough money. it is formed with a deficit of traits. i say it's epic started a year or two ago. for example, i, well, i am very often in the security council in various commissions, and we considered this code last year, so this is a systematic process. i say that and how is this connected, for example, with the unification of uh laws with russia, because there is no way, because, well, many many have also begun to say that look, we are building a union state. it is likely that this is some kind of tax danger. we have signed an agreement. this is also and the changes that we are actively involved in we are already discussing, that is, the unification of the tax legislator for the two states. they are connected in no way, that is, we have happiness. the unification of the legislation of the russian federation is only about the administration of indirect taxes, again,

i repeat on administration, that is, all these measures that we are jointly taking are aimed at ensuring that each of the countries identifies and suppresses and points out a tax offense for an ordinary payer. that is, if it deserves to touch on the topic of unification. these agreements will not affect not at all. that's the question, so well here, i'd like to bring back to our main topic again what we're discussing today. why exactly from january 1. and what happened on january 1, was the simplified taxation system for individual entrepreneurs canceled? well, yes, but it was canceled not from january 1 from january 1. it entered into force a norm of the law, but these norms of the law were adopted a year ago, and then we said to business dear, that is , systematic action was taken to limit. now he can go calmly and that means. trust amplify and none comments about what we didn't know and we

forgot. and we still something there are released simplistic. i’m telling her that, in fact, the decision to abolish it was already made more than a year ago, and everyone already knew about this the single tax rates that they were going up. yes, we declared it, but why are they increasing, because for 5 years they have not increased at all, and when there were pandemic times, they generally decrease. and if we compare the single tax rate for individual entrepreneurs in the city of minsk for large shopping centers, because all these years there are up to the twenty-second single tax rate. they were installed depending on where the outlet is located. well, in my simple words, i will say this. here the single tax rate was less than the amount of income tax paid by the average citizen of the city of minsk that is why the rates were raised and what i was talking about was avoiding unfair tax competition, that is, we gradually raised the single tax rates to

13% last year tax egg this year we raised them to 16% of the level of withdrawal, but what i want to draw attention to, we did not raise them not in last year, not this year, because even this year we would raise the single tax rate to 16% of the level of the egg. we would have to raise them even more and four, perhaps, and in some positions. we are five times this based on all the income that is declared and declared by our leaky lamentations. i ask one question. here he is. i just read it, again we have alexander yes, there is a question about cryptocurrency. is it true that with the help of cryptocurrency you can get away from , for example, your detention, because to leave from taxes, well, it seems like such a story, there are a lot of questions and you need cryptocurrencies cryptocurrencies cryptocurrencies. so in general, what is panacea huh? for those who are trying to evade taxes, when we still had cryptocurrency, we were just starting, when all sorts of seminars

were held. uh, when it was not clear how we would regulate the ban. here, look at the use of talking about currency and more than one tax authority, a professional knows nothing. well, about the planet paid smart man. he said the safest thing is a cash, and cryptocurrency, no matter how they say, that she's anonymous uh, it's all calculated anyway. here at the beginning of the transfer, when i spoke there was. uh, cutting, yes, uh, financial investigators. a man was detained there. these are just representatives of the cryptocurrency business, so to speak, and, accordingly, now technologies allow. there are such crimes and many come to light. uh, last year was a major uh crypto exchange, uh was uh, let's just say. e stopped his activities, and for some reason everyone thinks that crypting is mmm. uh, if there is a decree. yes, this famous eighth and it is written that physical person. maybe there without paying taxes to sell to buy. well, almost

offshore. yes, for some reason everyone starts to abuse it. how do they forget? what if you do it yourself, yes, then, in principle, without taxes, but as soon as, well, everyone’s appetite grows, he himself makes a lot of money he can’t cope. you can earn even more money by hiring people. and that's another story. this is registration in pvd, other taxes, etc., i thought i opened the ip. society is you understand that taxes are, but there are the part that counts. why should i give part of my income to the state? i think it's inappropriate for me to explain that part of your child is in kindergarten in kindergarten. oh, tuchitsya in school free education free medicine. who is protecting them? well, here it is. that's often for some reason what we don't need, which we have today and the

guarantee they are taken for granted, but there is another point when we say that here you are, i'm all present here, we pay taxes we hmm, of course we use it. yes, the same free medicine free education. and there are people in particular who do not pay taxes. well, it can also use all the same. this topic can be different, if the so-called, so my colleague will correct me, the thirty-third article in the tax code, which speaks of before accrual in the event that and this, that in the case of whether it is interpreted very frivolously. yesterday, the day before yesterday, you released a comment about leaving, yes about, well, that's what so to speak, e how did not take time off to leave . yes, that is, that you can not play business. from this point of view. well, well, this is probably, yes, really, as it were, by the theme of this event, you wanted to continue the

cryptocurrency, yes, yes, that is, the topic, it is actually quite interesting. but what a colleague from the dfr was saying, that is, it is necessary to remove illusions, of course, that is, a decreer who determines the procedure for the work of our citizens. it clearly says that an individual can buy sell exchange mine only for ourselves when we are heard. that this is what individual entrepreneurs want to do, it can be done, but it must be a resident of a high -tech park, that is, this illusion must also be removed. and when i hear that individual comrades, not being residents of the hi-tech park, while engaging in such and such activities. this will basically be a prohibited activity, that a colleague will have completely different consequences for a forbidden act. said that one was opened last year. yes, not one, we had more than one crypto exchanger, that is, we together with law enforcement agencies , they opened it, and believe me, the consequences and

financial consequences are extremely serious, so here we must also warn our citizens in this part for ourselves. you can do the state clearly says nothing then you don't have to pay any taxes for yourself. but if you start to engage in activities, and you are a non-resident of the high -tech park. here already there is a restriction any what there? well, an indulgence, any kind of mitigation, any kind of some kind. fully they are constantly trying to take advantage, but kindness for weakness, or something, that is, the fish is looking for where a person is deeper, where is better than that, but here in this case liberalization alone will not solve the issue, i’m here, well, i’m constantly talking about this should be the education of responsibility. yes, the responsibility of business, respectively, human citizenship, social responsibility, what happened is liberalization. this is not liberalization. this is an optimization. that's right, she said for the minister of finance. this increase in system efficiency is not only the overlay system as a whole financial system. duality

, triplicity, fivefoldness of different systems for the same types of activity. these are the same niches for money laundering, the same equal different conditions of competition the state. now , at last, it began to do what it should do to take. this is a single tax for 12 years. he was someone who initiated him, initiated the business, and as a result, the state lost billions and hundreds of millions. money who was responsible for this, well, gained experience invaluable experience yuri question. yes, i'm sorry, again in august of the twentieth, because on in fact, many people say that well, the main engine of this protest, just the same, were peshniks about it. even the president said we are not talking about the fact that all peshniks are bad just like all ipshiks, but of an extremely extremist persuasion, and they were a lot of journalists sitting among all other people. well, all the same, many people who

really paid this very simple tax, they, in fact, enjoyed all the benefits. and after that they went out. here's how to ask for more interchangeable authorities. how so this is the second question? to what extent we really have a simple taxation system then and now, compared, for example, with europe, to what extent these people really did not see how the state is meeting us halfway. as the heroes vasilyevich say, yeah. well, you know link. here are the events of xx with a fixed e, a fixed-fixed fiscal factor, probably, it would be wrong. it seems to me that there will be more taxes or less taxes. this would not affect their activity here, a combination of other factors. eh, it means that regarding your question about the simplicity of our tax system. well, of course, according to the income system, the system. here is income taxation. we probably have the

best in europe, the simplest single tax of 13%. well, by the way, many experts say that it's good that it's time to, yes, but to consider e consider just switching and to a progressive scale. uh, so uh plus uh, of course in eastern western europe there is a very complicated deduction system. that is, as simple as it is with us, probably, uh, an individual entrepreneur will not calculate. how much does he need to pay pay, but nevertheless you know, here, uh , i am listening to an expert, so, uh, i listened very carefully, uh, who speaks not only on the economy, but, uh, means on integration. uh, very tight and therefore i can’t understand whether you are for the bolsheviks or for the communists. you me explain one question. why does the russian federation have a simplified attention system for entrepreneurs with

up to 130 people and up to 200 million rubles. in a year of turnover for a minute, about 220 thousand dollars a month, are they of a different grade? it's just that if we go or we're a different kind if we follow the path of unification, sooner or later we will face the issue of access to common goods, which means the creation of a single market for goods, works, services. e registration, so that our entrepreneurs will run to russia to register. why is the state so not afraid of these risks? and? pay attention to the numbers 130 people. and you can pay a single tax. the thing is, you don't have to, i'm sorry. you say that, that is, you can say your logic, so there is russia. this is the ultimate truth and we will do it the way they do not, if the state, which is in in many ways, the russian experience is negative for us, but there are individual cases where they undertake ours, therefore, from this point

of view, they have large incomes from energy resources. our country has a slightly different economic structure, so for us these 270,000 entrepreneurs, who form only 2% of the tax base, and through which hundreds of millions of dollars go through the laundering system, can not be through 20%. this is critical, therefore the question is from them so that we cannot take the western one for ourselves some standards. you already have a constitution where you are one of the speakers the same thing, and in business you have to shape your own adapted to your realities. good, then. here's the third question, as stated in the question from the chat. well , probably, uh, colleagues with the ministry of taxes and duties, but nonetheless. i know this question touched. there, some telephone hooligan from abroad called on the hot line to him a spider or someone and says. and why

do our taxes increase all the time, when they do not decrease, and this is really relevant the question is, is this true? or are we still missing something? move out. i already said that even during this program, we reduced taxes, including for individual entrepreneurs, which we spoke about, that is, we must not forget that we still have the right of local authorities. how to raise and lower taxes, and therefore, when the authorities usually add, but in this particular part, when it was said that when the pandemic seasons came in our country, just the same rates were even reduced here what are we talking about, that is, this, if we are talking about that, here is the recent past. and if we lead much more distant times, then we must not forget that the same simplification is related to the same. we taxation there in general, the rates were lowered at first . this is a question. now we are talking about the average temperature in the hospital, it must be taken into account that on 60% of the territory we have preferential taxation, we do not give steam, there

10-10 years ago we have investment projects of contracts, including foreign ones. it is an incorrect thesis that she taxes go up all the time. we just do it by choice. why are projects that really have interests in the country, this is a false thesis. he misleads people that this is in your opinion, what happened to the tax is from the point of view of legislators. this is a step. which is a normal step for all business entities. we equally participated in the social projects of our state, because in order to have money for our social sphere of health care , education, culture, including defense, taxes must naturally be received. today it was already repeated that here, uh, part of the change that comes this year, they were already uh, programmed were discussed last year. and so, when we considered the tax code of last year and now this year, a simple example, if we also

took part, let me finish my thought, if we take ideal entrepreneurs, they use three types of taxation more simply. the system of a unified and common system of taxation. and now let's see what contribution each system was to our state the biggest - these are those who used the general taxation system of the order of 10 + - e thousand in belarusian rubles, well, there for one working one who used the simplified system. go to tax paid five times less. uh-huh and could provide the same types of services goods justice is. well, probably not quite like that, that's why today the state is pushing, guys. get out on the right uh, the rules of the game. work it seems to me the state with the help of dfr positions, therefore, here is what today and

the income tax is being implemented about it already for a whole year it was possible to decide who, how and what will do the preparation? there was a question for you, as a theoretician, we are certainly constantly being asked for, uh, expertise of certain uh, legislative acts, we are participating in this process, but my colleagues don’t understand why we are always talking about administration and tightening. uh, taxation is about its diversity. starting this year, we are driving new ones again. i will repeat for the most employment range. yes, we have a larger assortment, that is, for those alone they can choose one. yes, probably left the reader for certain subjects of the economy, which are individual entrepreneurs, who were no longer individual entrepreneurs. they expanded their activities so much that they were already beginning to fall under the activities of medium-sized enterprises and

so on, but again, superfluous colleagues are talking about toughening. so for some reason we started from that and we start to fight back and say, what oh. why so such taxes always. so they must be fought back. this is where you have to pay taxes. i don't know, i think igor viktorovich will say that we are constantly reducing the tax burden, so at the expense of what? see it here about ip ip, but the question we've been talking about this for a long time too. hello who and how much will pay for the apartment. i registered for myself in the summer of 22 that i will pay how the apartments are privatized, how it will be calculated when paying . in the twenty-third, but in the twenty-fourth and some amounts external that apartments. nothing, our apartment is fine. no problem. yes, it's all right. everything is fine. yes, our

editors have counted. now. yes, we have , roughly speaking, just for many years in the first apartment. we used tax benefits , moreover, a in relation to. there were no such tax preferences in flaming houses. this is where the decision was made. i will say not even in terms of fiscal measures in the plan, but in terms of additional revenue sources for the budget. that is, this measure was taken more in terms of establishing social justice, because i live relatively speaking in the private sector. i always paid, i always and i live in my next house on the second or third floor, i did not pay anything at all, but there are more of the same absolutely true. yes, but then again, what, but the estimated cost of one square meter. it is established by tax applications, the relevant annex to the tax code. i will say frankly, everyone can calmly open and see that there were these speculations that since january 1, oh, real estate tax has increased by 11%, but this is not true. we commented literally on the next day immediately these speculations the

tax itself is in this part the estimated cost is indexed and we will consider the tax for the year 23 also simple question, two-room apartment 60 m². how much will i have to open the application, look at the estimated value for the city of minsk and the area for calculating the increase. and you determine your tax, that is, we multiply the cost by the number of square meters and by 0.1 and we will get the amount in order to gradually lead in order to gradually prepare again please note that the estimated cost of one square meter is significantly lower than the market value. and now the market value is somewhere around 1,800 rubles. for more, but it is not 810 rubles. which is in the city, minsk, you will agree that everything is correct. but yes, i want to say that in this regard, really, the numbers that are charged to us for paying for apartments are minimal, because on average

in europe property tax is about one percent approximately, that is, we have an order of magnitude less, as for again, returning to our long-suffering ipshniks. uh, agree that the experts, uh, have weighty arguments, uh, but i would like to ask if the ministry of taxes and duties is ready if well, according to some objective figures , it sees that there has been a decrease in revenue, maybe the reduction is somehow not right what to soften, but to study this question. yes, maybe even in relation to some of the groups, because here i came here, the sound engineers came up to me and said that we had a tax of 120 rubles. then there are about 240, well, depending on the region. now 500 of us are tied into one group with corporate party with those who are conducted by the sound engineer. e, a leading corporate party, can get $ 1,000, and we can get a maximum of 50.

now, if the work is like this, it means that yes is separated from the cutlet, will we still take part in the non. mean development of directors' projects we have recorded a small comment before from e-recipients and asks a specific question. we are located in a small village. we have other work. no. this is the only source of our income, and therefore we will work, under any conditions, try to change. i wish that of the executive committee, when we will be registering the agro-estate according to the new one, they paid attention to the fact that such estates as ours, where we work only with our family without e, attracting hired labor, differed in taxes from the estate, which are located closer to the big cities, in which a lot of hired

staff, probably, there should still be a difference in taxes, maybe our such estates should remain on a fixed tax, and larger estates should go to a percentage of the profits. well, they did exactly that. so in general the questions are spelled out that basically from the first. kam e-e can and should be transferred to a tax on professional income, but there is an executive branch in the field. here's how i implemented it is points that may decide depending. what does the cargo estate do, how does it conduct its activities, what does it do and leave the old system that was not used, they are almost all wedding corporate parties. this i think is a lifting amount for

any homestead game, so it is the right of the local local executive operating bodies. and and what can we say to our sound mode? and here everything is extreme, just again, and i have already heard about a simplified system. whether we will monitor, we always monitor, including the volume of budget receipts in this area. and i just want to translate one statistic that concerns the simplified system of taxation of individual entrepreneurs, that is, from year to year, the volume of their income and income. by controlled by the tax authorities, and this is not all budget revenues were up to 1%. so say that and here is this category something decided on a national scale. probably it will not be entirely correct as far as sound directors are concerned, but in my opinion it is the best option. for them, this is a transition to the generally established procedure for taxation of income tax and payment of income. yes, there is income. you pay no income. that's what we talked about at the beginning of the program, in general, this is an

interesting thing to pay. i will now act as a consultant to your soul in general, this is what if i understand correctly, in general this is a violation of labor laws and leaving from taxes, because in theory you should have a staffing table. there must be a sound or seen operator, and he must receive a salary. according. and there is if you why at all this raises the question. so it doesn't really matter here. to be effective, feedback, guaranteed response and, of course, we observe that the ministry of taxes and duties is doing this work. hmm, very efficiently with a large degree of efficiency. i would like to. where do you get questions then yuri questions. e, so i have only one question about this unification. i'm afraid that, in the process of integration, we will already reach the level that we will have a single market in general. yes, relatively speaking, maybe the russian tax federation, as it were, with what we

have today as individual entrepreneurs. this is a class. this is really, uh, today we are talking about those people who will become self-employed and will pay, as a tax on professional income, individual entrepreneurs and please pay attention. here criticized recently that of us the union made a promise, but let these promises be made and kept. i mean, the class of individual entrepreneurs has become 270.000. let it be 1%, but all orders were fulfilled. no, i mean that there is a lot of work in the regions and districts and we are not talking now about those who minimized or evaded taxation systems and so on, we are talking about that class and today it is not

individual entrepreneurs who are changing taxation today turbulence us makes me say that the geopolitics of guerin, our implementation, uh, the globalization of geo-economics allows us. eh, dream. there is no need to set those tasks today for businesses in the field. here's how to find a job, how to arrange children? and this is what we are talking about, how these people will pay taxes there. i am a little and here is this index of business optimism. here it is for 2022. here are the percentages that were paid even under the 16% system, yes, according to income tax, it affected the business by 50%, but only those individual entrepreneurs who were located precisely in the regions right there speech about micromaus medium-sized enterprises comes to voice the thought. here in the first part of the program that he voiced the numbers, but about that, and what part of e of all ipeshniks? well, not in the wrong direction, but in the

direction of using certain benefits, looking for loopholes, how much the state lost, if everything worked as it should, that is, according to the law, an ideal system. so maybe then the state would not have needed mini-finances. now assessed the effect of the tax code, which says, that is, he says this and at the same time, but the ministry of finance estimates these reforms at 100 million rubles. here is some specific figure from a competent source. what percentage of e, after all, they didn’t tell us those violations, we summarize our last minute alyona, i probably only need to say that to remind you that ignorance of the laws does not exempt from responsibility, in fact. if you live in this state, you work in this state, then you yourself must follow the rules of the game, which, well, it means

nothing is hidden. that that's the statistic there are, uh, in our rural areas. we have exactly 5 seconds. the number of ipshniks is growing, they are not decreasing, pay taxes and you will live in a wonderful country.

thursday, allied programs with russia, intermediate results and problematic aspects. the theme of the meeting with the president chose their own path and live by their own rules. what political transformation awaits ours?