hello, welcome to everyone who is now looking back at the events with us , reflecting, who understands this? why did they happen, what is all this leading to? i am very pleased to welcome the guests of our today's program. thanks for taking the time, but let's get started. we are of course with news from the current. here we have declared a year of peace and creation, but at this time, look while we are thinking about peace von der, lein, head of the european commission. we are threatened with sanctions again. listen to what he says we will put pressure on the kremlin for as long as will be required through a tough sanctions regime and we will extend these sanctions to those who militarily support russia's war such as belarus or iran. is this aleksey

sergeevich what? bears, well, to be dishonored, firstly, secondly, first. why the sanction is dishonored has not led to anything, there is no package of sanctions. they don’t impose sanctions on russia and belarus now, not because they don’t want to recognize us. we don’t know what to introduce already, what to take away, so as not to completely destroy the european economy, this is the first. and the second. look it up told the truth on the other side. all 20 years, after all, the sanctions are not the first against us. they are hard to understand in europe who it is and what kind of gender representation there is, uh, all 20 years sanctions have been imposed on belarus not for elections, nor for some pseudo-democratic norms . in fact, the west has always been spitting on the election campaign of ours and who will be elected only, how we conduct them, as in the whole world. this is hypocrisy. in fact, the sanctions were introduced from the moment lukashenka came to power as a people's the president is only at the same time for his course towards the

strategic union of the russian federation, and he openly says to be friends with russia, you cannot be friends with the united states. it is possible to be friends with china , it is impossible to be friends with iran. in the middle east, we will determine for you who you will be friends with, with whom to trade and how to live? here it is european democracy in their understanding. that is, he openly says, we know perfectly well that belarus is not participating in a special military operation. everyone knows this, belarus is an ally of russia belarus will not allow russia to be stabbed in the back. this is what this is how to understand? and we are for this sanctions because you want to build an alliance with russia why does he have these sanctions against lithuania because it is an ally of the united states why does he have these sanctions against european countries that supply weapons to ukraine unleash a war destroy ukrainian people, they are destroying the ukrainian people, we are saving them thousands of ukrainians on the territory of belarus found

blood on bread. work tenacious now peacefully and thanks to you destroy ukraine destroyed this poor unfortunate country brotherly people to us and you are still driving sanctions, but i repeat it funny, because their sanctions are ridiculous, that you are driving swift, you can turn off more. and the sooner you turn off russia, belarus from swift and turn off the whole world, the sooner you create your own banking system. everything you do now is for our benefit. you are finally forcing russia, uh, and the whole other world to create their own. and by the way, if we take belarusian russian relations, all this is for the benefit of the past reason, finally everything that lukashenka said our president with 1994 on integration everything that he asked russia to do in order to strengthen our union, began to be done , and one of the reasons that this is being done? this action of the european union continues to act more quickly and stronger, while we understand that such pressure, which does not stop and will not stop, it explains to all of us. why

do we need to maintain the high readiness of our armed forces and why do we need to debug all the security systems in our country over and over again the other day the president visited abu training ground from lesnovsky looked at how our armed forces serve and operate there. taking this opportunity, he looked to the russians and the joint grouping to give this fragment. let's see now. i think you will tell me more than i can tell you today . for me, this is very important. and not only for me, for belarus, this difficult experience is very important. therefore, this is the first thing you can tell me. i will listen very carefully and use this when preparing our armed forces of belarus and russia to defend our common fatherland. well the most important thing. the main thing is that we agreed with your chiefs commander what you would say about the shortcomings. because we will have to continue to work in the same mode

to train belarusians and russians. you do not think that uh, like conder. thank you for helping us and so on. we not only helped you, we helped ourselves. we get a lot of information from you, this is an experience. well, our officers are helping to prepare for those who are short. they sniffed figuratively speaking, and those who need to remember the skills of the military. this is also a school for them - this is a lesson. we see how everyone at once, but they start to get nervous when such meetings happen between the president and the military, especially when the russian military is there, especially when they also say in parallel that there will be a joint flight exercise until february . and they are from sanctions and threats, and yes , weapons, not only to ukraine, but even more so in general to treat all this. well we

do what we have to do take care of our own safety, looking at what is happening around while doing this, and any person even especially, not next in military and political affairs. he sees the difference in cooking. yes, from our side. that is, we are really preparing to defend our own territory. we are not creating any shock groups. we don't threaten. we do not make any territorial claims to our neighbors, we do not pursue a policy of annexation softly behind the scenes, as it does in poland in relation to, for example, ukraine, especially its western parts, we do not declare publicly, and now i analyze carefully. what are polish analysts talking about? well, that is, this is the political class that pronounces some things are much further than polish officials. there are three theses. first thesis. we will definitely need to stop russia if he is successful. how to either enter the territory of ukraine on

our own or help ukraine in such a way that it does not let the russian army go further there on the dnieper, the second thesis after achieving success in ukraine russia and the third thesis. after embossed belarus russia squeeze out from europe to siberia at about the level of the 17th century, so that it is located. well , as patrushev said, make moscow out of russia. these are the open plans of analysts. plus or minus there are nuances of how we will achieve this, for example, another discussion. we are invading belarus poles, they say so or organize it. here the coup is supposedly internal. that's what we're talking about, or both. well, that is, such a hybrid make a mess, and then naturally what we do it is aimed at preventing such plans, to ensure our security and not allowed. damn,

revanchist and imperialist of the west to create these cordons and new barriers, let's say. uh, the dividing lines, in short, well, a serious threat. now it is coming from poland . we are watching when they are armed to the teeth with their military budget. now there, if we take the total spending on military purposes, they buy tanks from the germans from the koreans for 30 billion dollars, and we understand that this is not defensive, but offensive equipment, of course, definitely what alexey just said vladimirovich absolutely, so we, our leadership, the authorities of our president are well aware of the threat that exists and we are absolutely correct when, within the framework of our union state with the russian federation, we strengthen our borders, we create this formed group that provides protection, and from aggressive intentions from the west that we will leave against us and those things that are being exaggerated. this is what our dear polish colleague was talking about. see, yes,

which are voiced territorial claims at one time, they said that they already had little, which means some kind of oriental kreses yes, it means when they need the whole of belarus , and they somehow strive to pursue this policy of theirs, forgetting, therefore, and not taking into account historical lessons, in fact . again, poland look at her, but it turns out she has almost all around enemies. well, okay. yes in the east, traditionally, it means that russia is its allies for the polish elite. this means enemy number one, but in the west, that they have some kind of relationship in germany now. we talking about the elite. yes, as it is set, i think, after all, the population among the poles is quite sensible existing people. i think that the majority of the population does not seek war, who are trying to promote these polish elites and others in one way or another, but i would like to draw attention to the fact that in fact this is an elite, it starts to quarrel with its neighbors. yes, it means that relations with germany are in the west, uh, the thesis is reparation, which look, but in fact,

what we see in poland, because it is turning into sort of like, uh, fist, where is the strike force of the united states of america in european? on the continent why are the poles behaving like this, the polish elites, let’s say, behave quite loosely, because they feel the support of washington, who they turn to for support, if some things are not decided there, then they run to the united states and ask to support their policy on the territory of europe, eastern europe, we understand that all allies of the united states must keep before their eyes. this afghan plane, or rather, an american plane, who left kabul how huge heights fell off from there. those who yesterday were allies friends olga igorevna and you noticed such an interesting moment. like all the forces that we call them, we call them fugitives, yes, they call themselves positions, but a position is not a force that destroys their own state, it ’s still a struggle for power, but not the destruction of the state, so we can’t name them opposition, therefore, probably, the best definition for them is

warsaw in vilnius, which is now here is the usual thesis that ukraine has the moral right to strike at the territory of belarus, we are already used to this by their statements. although they do not refuse and do not weaken this line, but now they have a story. just think about the fact that the belarusians have to pay reparations to the ukrainians, what they are preparing for us. this is where they are being led, it is clear that these people are not independent. why they are investing in this village, well, it also develops within the framework of the thesis that belarus is an aggressor, if there is a status aggressor, and it will be enshrined in international law. naturally, the speech about reparations from russia has been voiced for quite a long time, and also those seized assets that are in the european union. now a campaign is being launched about the fact that they should be confiscated and go to pay for the expenses incurred by ukraine and within belarus

, the same thing. yes, that won't work. this is nonsense, that is, they are a normal person. it can’t be that the topic became popular that launched it. yes her launched, poland, it requires reparations. but now, probably, from almost everyone. but what we talked about and and with respect to belarus, i think it will be the same, after all, if we remember the twenties, and then without precedent pressure that was exerted on our country, it was compare the pressure that is being exerted on russia today, that is, the great power, which has the resources. and what is happening now, that is, we are being compared. uh, with russia and no one will be shy. i would about it at all i didn’t test any people, because in relation to belarus, the middle or even small powers will apply some other places, they say, what will happen to us if russia loses like ours? yes, as the main acid, that if you still have any doubts , then keep in mind you will be crushed into

powder in this tradition of endless reparations to pay it is not clear what i would only share the fugitive and the leaders run this rhetoric. now that's a disappointment. there 's huge rhetoric - it's among those who are fully supported by their masters western polish united states of america and their rhetoric always depends on what they were told now the main topic of ukraine is belarus, so that they do not want to leave the agenda, the international one has left. it is clear that they are trying to unite us with aggression, but everyone understands that the main struggle for the future of europe has unfolded in ukraine, respectively, the rhetoric of the second moment, we now see that the main money goes there to ukraine to support this war, they have little left to something to get, not at any cost cling to this to these questions. but what they are doing is very cynically mean , not only do they say to bomb our

country to destroy the children of the old people, not only do they say that we have to pay someone. although if we have never said this, the whole of europe owes us everything we owe everyone must thank us to the end of all generations for the fact that we have liberated from fascism. what price we paid our grandfathers , no country in the european union has paid the righteousness, but we have never behaved like this , because we always stand for united peaceful europe today you said one thesis, who is in favor of war. e in europe yes, no one will eat to take the people, not one country of the european union, the people of the war do not want to, so the most important answer now is, where is the power of the people, in our country the president of the people, they begin to say elections, seams , elections. so the president does what the people want, our people do not want war. we want peace. we want to live normally , trade normally, develop normally, and the polish president is the people's president. pass more people want trade with belarus.